Nature of MoH···I bonds in Cp2Mo(L)H···I‐C≡C‐R Complexes (L=H,CN, PPh2, C(CH3)3; R=NO2, Cl,Br, H,OH, CH3, NH2)

The nature of the MoH···I bond in Cp₂Mo(L)H···I‐C≡C‐R (L= H, CN, PPh₂, C(CH₃)₃; R=NO₂, Cl, Br, H, OH, CH₃, NH₂) was investigated using electrostatic potential analysis, topological analysis of the electron density, energy decomposition analysis and natural bond orbital analysis. The calculated results show that MoH···I interactions in the title complexes belong to halogen‐hydride bond, which is similar to halogen bonds, not hydrogen bonds. Different to the classical halogen bonds, the directionality of MoH···I bond is low; Although electrostatic interaction is dorminant, the orbital interactions also play important roles in this kind of halogen bond, and steric interactions are weak; the strength of H···I bond can tuned by the most positive electrostatic potential of the I atom. As the electron‐withdrawing ability of the R substituent in the alkyne increases, the electrostatic potential maximum of the I atom increases, which enhances the strength of the H···I halogen bond, as well as the electron transfer.     

Silber(I)‐di(arensulfonyl)amide und ein Silber(I)‐(arensulfonyl)(alkansulfonyl)amid: Von Bändern zu lamellaren Schichten mit kurzen Zwischenschichtkontakten C–H…Hal–C oder C–Br…Br–C

Structures of Ionic Di(arenesulfonyl)amides. 2. Silver(I) Di(arenesulfonyl)amides and a Silver(I) (Arenesulfonyl)(alkanesulfonyl)amide: From Ribbons to Lamellar Layers Exhibiting Short C–H…Hal–C or C–Br…Br–C Interlayer Contacts Low‐temperature X‐ray crystal structures are reported for AgN(SO₂C₆H₄‐4‐X)₂ · H₂O, where X is Cl ( 4 ) or Br ( 5 ), and for AgN(SO₂Ph)(SO₂Me) ( 6 ). Compounds 4 and 5 and the previously described F analogue ( 3 ) are isotypic, though not strictly isostructural (monoclinic, space group P2₁/c, Z = 4, but egregiously large discrepancies of x and z coordinates for corresponding atoms). Throughout this triad, glide‐plane related formula units are linked along the z axis to form infinite ribbons [(ArSO₂)₂N–Ag(μ‐H₂O)]_∞, in which Ag extends its coordination number to five by accepting one Ag–O bond from each of the (ArSO₂)₂N^⊖ ligands in the adjacent units. By means of O–H…O(S) hydrogen bonds, the ribbons are associated into lamellar layers parallel to the xz plane. Owing to the folded conformation of the anions, the layers display an inner polar region of Ag atoms, H₂O molecules and N(SO₂)₂ groups, outer apolar regions of stacked pairs of aryl rings, and interlayer regions hosting the halogen atoms. Inspection of the latter areas provides sound evidence that the distinct juxtapositions of adjacent layers arise from specific interlamellar attractions and repulsions ( 3 : two C–H…F, all F…F beyond the van der Waals limit d_W; 4 : one C–H…Cl, close packing of Cl atoms at Cl…Cl ≈ d_W; 5 : one C–H…Br, one short Br…Br contact < d_W, all other Br…Br > d_W). Structure 6 (monoclinic, P2₁/n, Z = 4) consists of a lamellar coordination polymer, in which the cation accepts one Ag–N and three Ag–O bonds drawn from four different anions. On account of crystal symmetry, the extended ligand has its Ph and Me groups distributed on both sides of the sheet, the phenyl rings forming the apolar regions of the lamella, whereas the smaller methyl groups are integrated into the corrugated inorganic region by means of weak C–H…O hydrogen bonds.     

Synthesis and Crystal Structures of Neutral Complexes of Tellurium(IV) – [PhTeX3L](X = Br,I; L = ethylenethiourea)

A three‐step one‐pot synthetic procedure to synthesize the neutral tellurium(IV) coordination compounds PhTeX₃L (X = Br, I and L = ethylenethiourea) has been developed and is described in this article. Oxidative halogenation of PhTeTePh in methanol generates the tellurium(II) derivative, PhTeX, which is subsequently complexed with ethylenethiourea, and, finally, further oxidative addition of additional halogen affords the corresponding tellurium(IV) compound PhTeX₃L in good yields. The final product was obtained by the slow evaporation of the reaction mixture as black crystals. The X‐ray structural analyses of the compounds show Te···X and X···X secondary interactions in the solid state and suggest a weak dependence of the formation of supramolecular assemblies on the nature of the halogen bonded to the tellurium atom.     

Structure Investigations on 4‐Halo‐1,2,3,5‐dithiadiazolyl Radicals XCNSSN• (X = F,Cl, Br): The Shortest Intradimer S···S Distance in Dithiadiazolyl Dimers

Crystals of the 4‐halo‐1,2,3,5‐dithiadiazolyl radicals (X = F, Cl, Br) were obtained by sublimation at 80 °C and 10^?2 Torr, and the structures were determined by X‐ray diffraction. The fluoro derivative crystallizes as a cisoid dimer in the space group P2₁/n, whereas the chloro and bromo derivatives crystallize isomorphous as twisted dimers in the space group C2/c. The chloro and bromo derivatives show the shortest intradimer S···S contacts of all known 1,2,3,5‐dithiadiazolyl dimers. In addition the obtained structure of ClCN₂S₂^? represents the fifth polymorph of ClCN₂S₂^? characterized by X‐ray crystallography. The structures and the packing including secondary interactions are discussed.     

Darstellung und Kristallstrukturen von tBu‐substituierten Disiloxanen des Typus tBu2SiX‐O‐SiYtBu2 (X = Y = OH,Br; X = OH,Y = H) und den Addukten tBu3SiOH·(HO3SCF3)0.5·H2O und tBu3SiOLi·(LiO3SCF3)2·(H2O)2

Syntheses and Crystal Structures of tBu‐substituted Disiloxanes tBu₂SiX‐O‐SiYtBu₂ (X = Y = OH, Br; X = OH, Y = H) and of the Adducts tBu₃SiOH·(HO₃SCF₃)_0.5·H₂O and tBu₃SiOLi·(LiO₃SCF₃)₂·(H₂O)₂ The disiloxanes tBu₂SiX‐O‐SiYtBu₂ (X = Y = H, OH) are accessible from the reaction of CF₃SO₂Cl with tBu₂SiHOH or tBu₂Si(OH)₂. By this reaction the disiloxane tBu₂SiH‐O‐SiHtBu₂ is formed together with tBu₂SiH‐O‐SiOHtBu₂. The disiloxanes tBu₂SiX‐O‐SiYtBu₂ (X = Y = Cl, Br) can be synthesized almost quantitatively from tBu₂SiH‐O‐SiHtBu₂ with Cl₂ and Br₂ in CH₂Cl₂. The structures of the disiloxanes tBu₂SiX‐O‐SiYtBu₂ (X = H, Y = OH; X = Y = OH, Br) show almost linear Si‐O‐Si units with short Si‐O bonds. Single crystals of the adducts tBu₃SiOH·(HO₃SCF₃)_0.5·H₂O and tBu₃SiOLi·(LiO₃SCF₃)₂·(H₂O)₂ have been obtained from the reaction of tBu₃SiOH with CF₃SO₃H and of tBu₃SiO₃SCF₃ with LiOH. According to the result of the X‐ray structural analysis (hexagonal, P‐62c), tBu₃SiOLi · (LiO₃SCF₃)₂·(H₂O)₂ features the ion pair [(tBu₃SiOLi)₂(LiO₃SCF₃)₃(H₂O)₃Li]⁺ [CF₃SO₃]^?. The central framework of the cation forms a trigonal Li₆ prism.     

Novel Copper(I) Clusters with 2‐(Diphenylphosphanyl)anilide Ligands. Synthesis and Crystal Structures of [Cu6X2(NHR)4] (X = Cl,Br, I; R = C6H4‐2‐PPh2)

Treatment of copper(I) halides CuX (X = Cl, Br, I) with lithium 2‐(diphenylphosphanyl)anilide [Li(HL)] in THF led to the formation of hexanuclear copper(I) complexes [Cu₆X₂(HL)₄] [X = Cl ( 1 ), Br ( 2 ), I ( 3 )]. In compounds 1 – 3 , the copper atoms are in a distorted octahedral arrangement and the amide ligands adopt a μ₃‐κP,κ²N bridging mode. Additionally there are two μ₂‐bridging halide ligands. Each of the [Cu₆X₂(HL)₄] clusters comprises two copper atoms, which are surrounded by two amide nitrogen atoms in an almost linear coordination [Cu–N: 186.2(3)–188.0(3) pm] and four copper atoms, which are connected to an amide N atom, a P atom, and a halogen atom in a distorted trigonal planar fashion [Cu–N: 199.6(3)–202.3(3) pm)].     

Aurophilicity in Tetraphenylphosphonium 7,8‐Bis(diphenylphosphino)‐7,8‐dicarba‐nido‐undecaborato‐dibromo‐digold(I) [PPh4][{(PPh2)2‐C2B9H10}(AuBr)2]

Reactions of tetraphenylphosphonium dibromoaurate(I) with 1,2‐bis(diphenylphosphino)‐1,2‐dicarba‐closo‐dodecaborane in 2:1 ratio in acetone solution yields brown crystals shown to be the title compound. A single crystal X‐ray study shows coordination of AuBr moieties by the phosphorus atoms of the ligand (Au‐P 2.253(1), 2.246(1); Ag‐Br 2.4041(7), 2.4067(7) Å), permitting a close Au···Au contact (2.9536(3) Å) with concomitant bending of the P‐Au‐Br arrays (173.99(4), 166.14(4)°) and a Br‐Au···Au‐Br torsion of 47.80(2)°.     

Über Kaliumdihalogenomonocyanomercurate(II) KHgX2CN · H2O (X = Cl,Br)

On Potassium Dihalogenomonocyanomercurates(II) KHgX₂CN · H₂O (X = Cl, Br) Hydrates of the dihalogenomonocyanomercurates KHgX₂CN · H₂O (X = Cl, Br) are obtained by reactions of equimoleculare amounts of HgX₂ and KCN in aqeuous solutions. The crystal structure of the rhombic KHgBr₂CN · H₂O (a = 454.2 pm; b = 1738.1 pm; c = 465.1 pm; Pmmm; Z = 2) contains linear HgBr₂ and Hg(CN)₂ groups and isolated Br^? and K⁺ ions. Therefore the compound can be formulated as a double salt Hg(CN)₂ · HgBr₂ · 2 KBr · 2 H₂O. The chloro compound is isotype.     

Donorstabilisierte Galliumdihalogenide Ga2X4·2D (X = Cl,Br; D = Donormolekül): Ein experimenteller Beitrag zu den Variationsmöglichkeiten der Ga‐Ga‐Einfachbindung

Donor‐stabilized Galliumdihalides Ga₂X₄·2D (X = Cl, Br; D = Donor): An Experimental Contribution on the Variation of the Gallium‐Gallium Single Bond During the disproportionation of metastable GaX‐solutions (X= Cl, Br) donor‐stabilized galliumdihalides are formed as oxidized products. According to X‐ray structure analyses they all exhibit dimeric entities DX₂Ga‐GAX₂D (D= THF, NHEt2, NEt3, 4‐^tButylpyridin or Br^‐), which means these compounds are isoelectronic with ethane and could schematically be regarded as representatives of catenulate or alkane‐like gallium subhalides: Ga_n(X, D)_2n+2. The gallium‐gallium bond in these compounds is shorter than in the organometallic compounds such as R₂Ga‐GaR₂. The comparison of the bonding situation in the galliumdihalides, particularly of the gallium‐gallium bond, shows clearly the influence by donor molecules as well as by halogen ligands.     

Bildung und Kristallstruktur von FcCH(t‐Bu)NHCH(Me)CH2OMe · LiI · Et2O

Formation and Crystal Structure of FcCH( t ‐Bu)NHCH(Me)CH₂OMe · LiI · Et₂O The title compound FcCH(t‐Bu)NHCH(Me)CH₂OMe · LiI · Et₂O ( 1 · LiI · Et₂O) was obtained by reaction of FcCH(t‐Bu)N(Li)CH(Me)CH₂OMe with MeI in a molar ratio 1 : 1 in diethylether. The Li atom is substituted by an H atom yielding the secondary amine. The formation of the expected N‐methyl substituted species could not be observed. 1 creates monomeric molecules with four coordinate Li atoms as a result of Li–N and Li–O interactions of the corresponding atoms of the ferrocenyl ligand and a solvent molecule. 1 · LiI · Et₂O: Space group P2₁2₁2₁, Z = 4, lattice dimensions at –60 °C: a = 10.492(2), b = 13.225(2), c = 18.846(3) Å, β = 90°, R₁ = 0.0478, wR₂ = 0.0801.     

Synthese,Struktur und Eigenschaften von [nacnac]MX3‐Verbindungen (M = Ge,Sn; X = Cl,Br, I)

Synthesis, Structure, and Properties of [nacnac]MX₃ Compounds (M = Ge, Sn; X = Cl, Br, I) Reactions of [nacnac]Li [(2,6‐ⁱPr₂C₆H₃)NC(Me)C(H)C(Me)N(2,6‐ⁱPr₂C₆H₃)]Li ( 1 ) with SnX₄ (X = Cl, Br, I) and GeCl₄ in Et₂O resulted in metallacyclic compounds with different structural moieties. In the [nacnac]SnX₃ compounds (X = Cl 2 , Br 3 , I 4 ) the tin atom is five coordinated and part of a six‐membered ring. The Sn–N‐bond length of 3 is 2.163(4) Å and 2.176(5) Å of 4 . The five coordinated germanium of the [nacnac]GeCl₃ compound 5 shows in addition to the three chlorine atoms further bonds to a carbon and to a nitrogen atom. In contrast to the known compounds with the [nacnac] ligand the afore mentioned reaction creates a carbon–metal‐bond (1.971(3) Å) forming a four‐membered ring. The Ge–N bond length (2.419(2) Å) indicates the formation of a weakly coordinating bond.     

Reactions of a Ga/P‐Based Frustrated Lewis Pair with HX (X = F – I), Heterocumulenes R–NCY (Y = O,S) and Chalcogens–Adduct Formation and Surprising Stability towards Protolysis

Treatment of the geminal Ga/P‐based frustrated Lewis pair (FLP) Mes₂P–C(GatBu₂)=C(H)–Ph ( 1 ) with HX (X = F, Cl, Br, I) afforded the corresponding adducts 2 with the protons bound to the P and the halide anions coordinated to the Ga atoms. Short intramolecular contacts may indicate P–H ··· X hydrogen bonding interactions. The Br and I compounds ( 2c , 2d ) were accessible in moderate yields even when aqueous solutions of the acids were employed. These unexpected reactions confirm the surprising stability of FLP 1 towards protolysis. Heterocumulenes R–N=C=Y (Y = O, S) and 1 yielded adducts with two different structural motifs. The N=C=Y groups were coordinated to the FLP either via the C=Y (Y = S; Ph–N=C=O) or the C=N bonds (Ph–N=C=O, Et–N=C=O). For phenyl isocyanate the C=O bonded isomer was observed in the solid state, while both isomeric forms were detected in solution. Steric shielding and the hardness of the atoms may influence the formation of the respective isomer. Cleavage of the C=S bonds of isothiocyanates was observed for the first time and afforded a sulfur adduct 9a , in which an S atom (electron sextet) was bound to the lone pair of electrons at phosphorus and to the Lewis acidic Ga atom. Four‐membered PCGaY heterocycles resulted, which were also synthesized in high yields by the direct reaction of 1 with propylene sulfide or selenium.     

Penta‐Ammoniates of Aluminium Halides: The Crystal Structures of AlX3·5NH3 with X = Cl,Br, I

Colourless crystals grow in the colder part of a glass ampoule when AlX₃·5NH₃ with X = Cl, Br, I is heated for 3—6 d to 330 °C (Cl), 350 °C (Br) and 400 °C (I), respectively. The chloride forms hexagonal prisms while the bromide and iodide were obtained as a bunch of lancet‐like crystals. The chloride and bromide crystallize isotypic whereas the iodide has an own structure type. All three are related to the motif of the K₂PtCl₆ type. So the formula of the ammoniates may be written as X₂[Al(NH₃)₅X] ≙ [Al(NH₃)₅X]X₂. The compounds are characterized by the following crystallographic data AlCl₃·5NH₃: Pnma, Z = 4, a = 13.405 (1)Å, b = 10.458 (1)Å, c = 6.740 (2)Å AlBr₃·5NH₃: Pnma, Z = 4, a = 13.808 (2)Å, b = 10.827 (1)Å, c = 6.938 (1)Å AlI₃·5NH₃: Cmcm, Z = 4, a = 9.106 (2)Å, b = 11.370 (2)Å, c = 11.470 (2)Å For the chloride and the bromide the structure determinations were successful including hydrogen positions. All three compounds contain octahedral molecular cations [Al(NH₃)₅X]²⁺ located in distorted cubes formed by the remaining 2X^— ions. The orientation of the octahedra to each other is clearly different for those with X = Cl, Br in comparison to the one with X = I.     

Synthesis and Characterization of the Manganese Hydroxide Halides Mn(OH)X (X = Br,I) and Crystal Structure of trans‐MnBr2·4H2O

The pale‐pink, hygroscopic compounds Mn(OH)X (X = Br, I) were obtained by high‐pressure synthesis in a Walker‐type multianvil apparatus. They crystallize in the space group P2₁/c with a = 640.48(3), b = 698.80(3), c = 615.54(2) pm, β = 110.30(1)° at 183(1) K (X = Br), and a = 686.18(3), b = 713.08(3), c = 637.18(3) pm, β = 109.51(1)° at 150(1) K (X = I). The crystal structures are isotypic to Cu(OH)Cl and consist of edge‐sharing distorted Mn(OH)₃X₃ octahedra arranged in sheets parallel to the bc‐plane. Spin‐polarized scalar‐relativistic DFT+U calculations predict an intrinsic magnetic insulating state (ca. 3.5 eV bandgap) that is proximate to frustration. Calculated effective magnetic moments equal to 4.34 μ_B/f.u. for Mn(OH)Br and 4.33 μ_B/f.u. for Mn(OH)I. FT‐IR spectroscopy confirmed interlayer hydrogen bonding. As a side result of the experiments, the compound trans‐MnBr₂ · 4H₂O was obtained. It crystallizes in the space group Cmcm with a = 438.64(2), b = 1167.84(6), and c = 730.95(4) pm.     

The enhancing effects of molecule X (X = PH2Cl,SHCl, ClCl) on chalcogen–chalcogen interactions in cyclic trimers Y···Y···X (Y = SHCl,SeHCl)

The enhancing effects of molecule X (X = PH₂Cl, SHCl, ClCl) on S···S and Se···Se chalcogen–chalcogen bonds in the cyclic trimers SHCl···SHCl···X and SeHCl···SeHCl···X were investigated by calculations at the MP2/aug‐cc‐pVTZ level. When molecule X is added to the dimer SHCl···SHCl (SeHCl···SeHCl), cyclic trimers are formed. Compared with the dimer, all the cyclic trimers have shorter S···S (Se···Se) lengths, greater electron densities, negative three‐body interaction energies, and larger second‐order perturbation energies. These results indicate that the addition of molecule X strengthens the original S···S (Se···Se) bond. For the SHCl···SHCl···X cyclic trimers, the S···S bond is strongest in SHCl···SHCl···PH₂Cl, weaker in SHCl···SHCl···SHCl, and weakest in SHCl···SHCl···ClCl. This same trend is observed for the Se···Se bond in SeHCl···SeHCl···X. This means that PH₂Cl provides the greatest enhancement to the S···S (Se···Se) interaction.     

Copper(I) π‐Complexes with 2‐Butyne‐1,4‐diol. Synthesis and Crystal Structure of Na[CuCl2(HOCH2C≡CCH2OH)]·2H2O

Crystals of anionic Na[CuCl₂(HOCH₂C≡CCH₂OH)]·2H₂O π‐complex have been synthesized by interaction of 2‐butyne‐1,4‐diol with CuCl in a concentrated aqueous NaCl solution and characterized by X‐ray diffraction at 100 K. The crystals are triclinic: space group , a = 7.142(3), b = 7.703(3), c = 10.425(4) Å, α = 105.60(3), β = 99.49(3), γ = 110.43(3)°, V = 495.9(4) ų, Z = 2, R = 0.0203 for 3496 reflections. The structure is built of discrete [CuCl₂(HOCH₂C≡CCH₂OH)]^? anionic stacks and polymeric cations among the stacks. The Cu^I atom adopts trigonal planar coordination of two Cl^? anions and the C≡C bond of 2‐butyne‐1,4‐diol, Cu–(C≡C) distance is equal to 1.903(3) Å. Na⁺ cations environment is octahedral and consists of O and Cl atoms. The crystal packing is governed by strong hydrogen bonds of O–H···Cl and O–H···O types.     

Zur Reaktion der Alkin‐Kupfer(I)‐Komplexe [CuX(S‐Alkin)] (X = Cl,Br, I; S‐Alkin = 3,3,6,6‐Tetramethyl‐1‐thia‐4‐cycloheptin) mit den Phosphanen PMe3 und Ph2PCH2CH2PPh2 (dppe)

Organometallic Compounds of Copper. XVIII. On the Reaction of the Alkyne Copper(I) Complexes [CuX(S‐Alkyne)] (X = Cl, Br, I; S‐Alkyne = 3,3,6,6‐Tetramethyl‐1‐thiacyclohept‐4‐yne) with the Phosphanes PMe₃ and Ph₂PCH₂CH₂PPh₂ (dppe) The alkyne copper(I) halide complexes [CuX(S‐Alkyne)]_n ( 2 ) ( 2 a : X = Cl, 2 b : X = Br, 2 c : X = I; S‐Alkyne = 3,3,6,6‐tetramethyl‐1‐thiacyclohept‐4‐yne; n = 2, ∞) add the phosphanes PMe₃ and Ph₂PCH₂CH₂PPh₂ (dppe) to form the mono‐ and dinuclear copper compounds [(S‐Alkyne)CuX(PMe₃)] ( 6 ) ( 6 a : X = Cl, 6 b : X = Br) and [(S‐Alkyne)CuX(μ‐dppe)CuX(S‐Alkyne)] ( 7 a : X = Cl, 7 b : X = Br, 7 c : X = I), respectively. By‐product in the reaction of 2 a with dppe is the tetranuclear complex [(S‐Alkyne)Cu(μ‐X)₂Cu(μ‐dppe)₂Cu(μ‐X)₂Cu(S‐Alkyne)] ( 8 ). In case of the compounds 7 prolonged reaction times yield the alkyne‐free dinuclear copper complexes [Cu₂X₂(dppe)₃] ( 9 ) ( 9 a : X = Cl, 9 b : X = Br, 9 c : X = I)). X‐ray diffraction studies were carried out with the new compounds 6 a , 6 b , 7 b , 8 , and 9 c .     

Crystal Structures of the Phosphorus‐Boron Adducts n‐Pr3P · BBr3 and I3P · BBr3

The structures of the phosphorus‐boron adducts n‐Pr₃P · BBr₃ (trigonal, space group P 4 c1, Z = 4, a = 11.5423(6), b = 11.5423(6) and c = 13.8066(7) Å) and I₃P · BBr₃ (orthorhombic, space group Pnma, Z = 4, a = 12.761(2), b = 11.427(1), c = 7.3728(7) Å) were determined by X‐ray crystallography. The P–B distance of 2.01(1) Å in I₃P · BBr₃ is significantly longer than the P–B bond in n‐Pr₃P · BBr₃ (1.95(1) Å). The different Lewis basicity of phosphorus halides, PX₃ (X = Cl, Br, I), and alkylphosphines is discussed. The charge transfer and the bond situation in these donor‐acceptor complexes is studied on the basis of NBO analysis. Selected frequencies of n‐Pr₃P · BBr₃ obtained by Raman and infrared spectroscopy are assigned and compared with the normal modes of I₃P · BBr₃.     

Hydrogen bond and σ‐hole interaction in M2C=S···HCN (M = H,F, Cl,Br, HO,H3C,H2N) complex: Dual roles of C=S group and substitution effect

An ab initio computational study of the dual functions of C?S group in the M₂C?S ··· HCN (M = H, F, Cl, Br, HO, H₃C, H₂N) complex has been performed at the MP2(Full)/aug‐cc‐pVTZ level. The C?S group can act as both the electron donor and acceptor, thus two minima complexes were found for each molecular pairs. The interaction energy of hydrogen bond in the F, Cl, or Br substituted complexes is less negative than that in the corresponding H₂CS one, while the interaction energy of the σ‐hole interaction is more negative. The OH substitution weakens the hydrogen bond, whereas the H₃C and H₂N substitution strengthens it. The σ‐hole interaction in the HO, H₃C, and H₂N complexes is very weak. The substitution effect has been understood with electrostatic induction and conjugation effects. The energy decomposition analysis has been performed for the halogen‐substituted complexes. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Quantum Chem, 2012.     

Dimerization of New T‐shaped Hypervalent Organotellurium(II) Dihalides: Synthesis and Structural Characterization of (PyH)[mesTeIX] (Py = pyridine; mes = mesityl; X = Cl,Br, I)

[mesTe]₂ reacts with iodine in toluene and further with (C₅H₆N)⁺X^? (X = I, Br, Cl) to give (PyH)[mesTeI₂] ( 1 ), (PyH)[mesTeIBr] ( 2 ) and (PyH)[mesTeICl] ( 3 ). The anionic fragments [(mes)TeI₂] and [(mes)TeIBr] of 1 and 2 are assembled as dimers by reciprocal, secondary Te···X interactions, linked also to the pyridinium cations through μ‐NH···X bonding. The anion [(mes)TeICl]^? ( 3 ) do not interact with neighboring anionic moieties, achieving also secondary NH···Cl bonding toward the pyridinium cation. The dimerization ability – with attaining of additional interionic hydrogen bridges – of 1 and 2 allow them to be viewed as partially “molecular” and as hypervalent compounds of Te^II, for which the observed linearity of the I–Te–X system and the similarity of the Te–X bond distances are expected.