N—H...O and N—H...N interactions in three pyran derivatives

The three pyran structures 6‐methylamino‐5‐nitro‐2,4‐diphenyl‐4H‐pyran‐3‐carbonitrile, C₁₉H₁₅N₃O₃, (I), 4‐(3‐fluorophenyl)‐6‐methylamino‐5‐nitro‐2‐phenyl‐4H‐pyran‐3‐carbonitrile, C₁₉H₁₄FN₃O₃, (II), and 4‐(4‐chlorophenyl)‐6‐methylamino‐5‐nitro‐2‐phenyl‐4H‐pyran‐3‐carbonitrile, C₁₉H₁₄ClN₃O₃, (III), differ in the nature of the aryl group at the 4‐position. The heterocyclic ring in all three structures adopts a flattened boat conformation. The dihedral angle between the pseudo‐axial phenyl substituent and the flat part of the pyran ring is 89.97 (1)° in (I), 80.11 (1)° in (II) and 87.77 (1)° in (III). In all three crystal structures, a strong intramolecular N—H...O hydrogen bond links the flat conjugated H—N—C=C—N—O fragment into a six‐membered ring. In (II), molecules are linked into dimeric aggregates by N—H... O(nitro) hydrogen bonds, generating an R₂²(12) graph‐set motif. In (III), intermolecular N—H...N and C—H...N hydrogen bonds link the molecules into a linear chain pattern generating C(8) and C(9) graph‐set motifs, respectively.     

Cocrystals of 6‐propyl‐2‐thiouracil: N—H...O versus N—H...S hydrogen bonds

In order to investigate the relative stability of N—H...O and N—H...S hydrogen bonds, we cocrystallized the antithyroid drug 6‐propyl‐2‐thiouracil with two complementary heterocycles. In the cocrystal pyrimidin‐2‐amine–6‐propyl‐2‐thiouracil (1/2), C₄H₅N₃·2C₇H₁₀N₂OS, (I), the `base pair' is connected by one N—H...S and one N—H...N hydrogen bond. Homodimers of 6‐propyl‐2‐thiouracil linked by two N—H...S hydrogen bonds are observed in the cocrystal N‐(6‐acetamidopyridin‐2‐yl)acetamide–6‐propyl‐2‐thiouracil (1/2), C₉H₁₁N₃O₂·2C₇H₁₀N₂OS, (II). The crystal structure of 6‐propyl‐2‐thiouracil itself, C₇H₁₀N₂OS, (III), is stabilized by pairwise N—H...O and N—H...S hydrogen bonds. In all three structures, N—H...S hydrogen bonds occur only within R₂²(8) patterns, whereas N—H...O hydrogen bonds tend to connect the homo‐ and heterodimers into extended networks. In agreement with related structures, the hydrogen‐bonding capability of C=O and C=S groups seems to be comparable.     

p‐Phenylenediamine and its dihydrate: two‐dimensional isomorphism and mechanism of the dehydration process,and N—H...N and N—H...π interactions

p‐Phenylenediamine can be obtained as the dihydrate, C₆H₈N₂·2H₂O, (I), and in its anhydrous form, C₆H₈N₂, (II). The asymmetric unit of (I) contains one half of the p‐phenylenediamine molecule lying about an inversion centre and two halves of water molecules, one lying on a mirror plane and the other lying across a mirror plane. In (II), the asymmetric unit consists of one molecule in a general position and two half molecules located around inversion centres. In both structures, the p‐phenylenediamine molecules are arranged in layers stabilized by N—H...π interactions. The diamine layers in (I) are isostructural with half of the layers in (II). On dehydration, crystals of (I) transform to (II). Comparison of their crystal structures suggests the most plausible mechanism of the transformation process which requires, in addition to translational motion of the diamine molecules, in‐plane rotation of every fourth p‐phenylenediamine molecule by ca 60°. A search of the Cambridge Structural Database shows that the formation of hydrates by aromatic amines should be considered exceptional.     

N—H...O and O—H...O hydrogen‐bonded supramolecular networks in 4‐chloroanilinium, 2‐hydroxyanilinium and 3‐hydroxyanilinium hydrogen phthalates

The title salts, 4‐chloroanilinium hydrogen phthalate (PCAHP), C₆H₇ClN⁺·C₈H₅O₄⁻, 2‐hydroxyanilinium hydrogen phthalate (2HAHP), C₆H₈NO⁺·C₈H₅O₄⁻, and 3‐hydroxyanilinium hydrogen phthalate (3HAHP), C₆H₈NO⁺·C₈H₅O₄⁻, all crystallize in the space group P2₁/c. The asymmetric unit of 2HAHP contains two independent ion pairs. The hydrogen phthalate ions of 2HAHP and 3HAHP show a short intramolecular O—H...O hydrogen bond, with O...O distances ranging from 2.3832 (15) to 2.3860 (14) Å. N—H...O and O—H...O hydrogen bonds, together with short C—H...O contacts in PCAHP and 3HAHP, generate extended hydrogen‐bond networks. PCAHP forms a two‐dimensional supramolecular sheet extending in the (100) plane, whereas 2HAHP has a supramolecular chain running parallel to the [100] direction and 3HAHP has a two‐dimensional network extending parallel to the (001) plane.     

Modulating the preferred O—H...O hydrogen‐bonding motif in a conformationally constrained environment through hydroxy‐group derivatization

The crystal structures of three conformationally locked esters, namely the centrosymmetric tetrabenzoate of all‐axial perhydronaphthalene‐2,3,4a,6,7,8a‐hexaol, viz.trans‐4a,8a‐dihydroxyperhydronaphthalene‐2,3,6,7‐tetrayl tetrabenzoate, C₃₈H₃₄O₁₀, and the diacetate and dibenzoate of all‐axial perhydronaphthalene‐2,3,4a,8a‐tetraol, viz. (2R*,3R*,4aS*,8aS*)‐4a,8a‐dihydroxyperhydronaphthalene‐2,3‐diyl diacetate, C₁₄H₂₂O₆, and (2R*,3R*,4aS*,8aS*)‐4a,8a‐dihydroxyperhydronaphthalene‐2,3‐diyl dibenzoate, C₂₄H₂₆O₆, have been analyzed in order to examine the preference of their supramolecular assemblies towards competing inter‐ and intramolecular O—H...O hydrogen bonds. It was anticipated that the supramolecular assembly of the esters under study would adopt two principal hydrogen‐bonding modes, namely one that employs intermolecular O—H...O hydrogen bonds (mode 1) and another that sacrifices those for intramolecular O—H...O hydrogen bonds and settles for a crystal packing dictated by weak intermolecular interactions alone (mode 2). Thus, while the molecular assembly of the two crystalline diacyl derivatives conformed to a combination of hydrogen‐bonding modes 1 and 2, the crystal packing in the tetrabenzoate preferred to follow mode 2 exclusively.     

N—H...S and C—H...S hydrogen bonds in two tetraalkylammonium dithiobiurea(1–) inclusion compounds

Two inclusion compounds of dithiobiurea and tetrapropylammonium and tetrabutylammonium are characterized and reported, namely tetrapropylammonium carbamothioyl(carbamothioylamino)azanide, C₁₂H₂₈N⁺·C₂H₅N₄S₂⁻, (1), and tetrabutylammonium carbamothioyl(carbamothioylamino)azanide, C₁₆H₃₆N⁺·C₂H₅N₄S₂⁻, (2). The results show that in (1), the dithiobiurea anion forms a dimer via N—H...N hydrogen bonds and the dimers are connected into wide hydrogen‐bonded ribbons. The guest tetrapropylammonium cation changes its character to become the host molecule, generating pseudo‐channels containing the aforementioned ribbons by C—H...S contacts, yielding the three‐dimensional network structure. In comparison, in (2), the dithiobiurea anions are linked via N—H...S interactions, producing one‐dimensional chains which pack to generate two‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded layers. These layers accommodate the guest tetrabutylammonium cations, resulting in a sandwich‐like layer structure with host–guest C—H...S contacts.     

2‐Cyano‐N‐(4,6‐dimethoxypyrimidin‐2‐yl)acetamide: complex sheets built from N—H...O and C—H...O hydrogen bonds

Molecules of the title compound, C₉H₁₀N₄O₃, (I), are linked into complex sheets by a combination of one N—H...O hydrogen bond and two C—H...O hydrogen bonds. Comparisons are drawn between (I) and some related compounds in respect of both their molecular conformations and their hydrogen‐bonding arrangements.     

Two substituted 2‐pyrrolin‐5‐ones: chains built from a single N—H...O hydrogen bond

In each of methyl 2‐methyl‐5‐oxo‐2‐pyrroline‐3‐carboxylate, C₇H₉NO₃, and 3‐acetyl‐2‐methyl‐2‐pyrrolin‐5‐one, C₇H₉NO₂, the pyrrolinone ring is planar. In each structure, molecules are linked into simple chains by way of a single N—H...O hydrogen bond.     

One‐dimensional C—H...N hydrogen‐bonded polymers in flexible tetrapyridyl systems

In N,N,N′,N′‐tetrakis(2‐pyridylmethyl)propane‐1,3‐diamine, C₂₇H₃₀N₆, (I), and N,N,N′,N′‐tetrakis(2‐pyridylmethyl)butane‐1,4‐diamine, C₂₈H₃₂N₆, (II), the twofold rotational symmetry of (I) favours the formation of a one‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded polymer with two columns of C—H...N hydrogen bonds, while the inversion symmetry of (II) allows the formation of a one‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded polymer stabilized by four columns of C—H...N hydrogen bonds. The possible role played by the chain length of the linking alkanediamine in determining the type of supramolecular architecture in this series of compounds is discussed.     

Dipolar S=O...C=O and C—H...O interactions in the molecular organization of 4,6‐di‐O‐acetyl‐2‐O‐tosyl‐myo‐inositol 1,3,5‐orthoesters

In the absence of conventional hydrogen bonding, the molecules of 4,6‐di‐O‐acetyl‐2‐O‐tosyl‐myo‐inositol 1,3,5‐orthoformate, C₁₈H₂₀O₁₀S, (I), and 4,6‐di‐O‐acetyl‐2‐O‐tosyl‐myo‐inositol 1,3,5‐orthobenzoate, C₂₄H₂₄O₁₀S, (II), are associated via C—H...O interactions. Molecules of (II) are additionally linked via dipolar S=O...C=O contacts. It is interesting to note that the sulfonyl O atom involved in the dipolar S=O...C=O contacts does not take part in any other interaction, indicating the competitive nature of this contact relative to the weak hydrogen‐bonding interactions.     

Five pseudopolymorphs of 6‐amino‐2‐thiouracil: absence of N—H...S hydrogen bonds

In order to study the preferred hydrogen‐bonding pattern of 6‐amino‐2‐thiouracil, C₄H₅N₃OS, (I), crystallization experiments yielded five different pseudopolymorphs of (I), namely the dimethylformamide disolvate, C₄H₅N₃OS·2C₃H₇NO, (Ia), the dimethylacetamide monosolvate, C₄H₅N₃OS·C₄H₉NO, (Ib), the dimethylacetamide sesquisolvate, C₄H₅N₃OS·1.5C₄H₉NO, (Ic), and two different 1‐methylpyrrolidin‐2‐one sesquisolvates, C₄H₅N₃OS·1.5C₅H₉NO, (Id) and (Ie). All structures contain R₂¹(6) N—H...O hydrogen‐bond motifs. In the latter four structures, additional R₂²(8) N—H...O hydrogen‐bond motifs are present stabilizing homodimers of (I). No type of hydrogen bond other than N—H...O is observed. According to a search of the Cambridge Structural Database, most 2‐thiouracil derivatives form homodimers stabilized by an R₂²(8) hydrogen‐bonding pattern, with (i) only N—H...O, (ii) only N—H...S or (iii) alternating pairs of N—H...O and N—H...S hydrogen bonds.     

C—H...O hydrogen‐bonding and C—H...π interactions in 3‐(4‐fluorophenyl)‐1,5,7‐trimethyl‐1,2,3,4‐tetrahydropyrido[2,3‐d]pyrimidine‐2,4‐dione

In the title compound, C₁₆H₁₄FN₃O₂, a diverse set of weak intermolecular C—H...π, π–π and C—H...O interactions link the molecules into sheets. The C—H...O interactions generate centrosymmetric rings with a graph‐set motif of R₂²(14) and chains with a C(8) motif.     

5‐Amino‐1‐benzoyl‐3‐methylpyrazole: complex sheets built from N—H...N,C—H...O and C—H...π(arene) hydrogen bonds

Molecules of the title compound [systematic name: (5‐amino‐3‐methylpyrazol‐1‐yl)(phenyl)methanone], C₁₁H₁₁N₃O, contain an intramolecular hydrogen bond. The molecules are linked into sheets by a combination of N—H...N, C—H...O and C—H...π(arene) hydrogen bonds. Comparisons are made with the hydrogen‐bonded structures of some related compounds.     

Metal complexes with chloride and triazole‐based ligands: investigation of a well‐resolved up–up–down–down (uudd) cyclic water tetramer and X—H...Cl (X = O and C) hydrogen‐bonding interactions

The crystal structure of the title complex, trans‐dichloridotetrakis[1‐phenyl‐3‐(1H‐1,2,4‐triazol‐1‐yl‐κN⁴)propan‐1‐one]copper(II) hexahydrate, [CuCl₂(C₁₁H₁₁N₃O)₄]·6H₂O, is isomorphous with that of the corresponding nickel and cobalt compounds. The complex has crystallographic inversion symmetry with the Cu^II atom on an inversion centre. Each Cu^II atom is six‐coordinated by one N atom from each of the four 1‐phenyl‐3‐(1H‐1,2,4‐triazol‐1‐yl)propan‐1‐one ligands in the equatorial plane and by two chloride ligands in axial positions. The structure includes a centrosymmetric irregular up–up–down–down (uudd) water tetramer cluster and O—H...Cl hydrogen bonds. Intermolecular C—H...Cl hydrogen bonds exist between adjacent molecules, resulting in a three‐dimensional supramolecular network.     

N—H...O,O—H...O hydrogen‐bonded supramolecular sheet formation in the bis(2‐aminoanilinium) fumarate, 3‐methylanilinium hydrogen fumarate and 4‐chloroanilinium hydrogen fumarate salts

In bis(2‐aminoanilinum) fumarate, 2C₆H₉N₂⁺·C₄H₂O₄²⁻, (I), the asymmetric unit consists of two aminoanilinium cations and one fumarate dianion, whereas in 3‐methylanilinium hydrogen fumarate, C₇H₁₀N⁺·C₄H₃O₄⁻, (II), and 4‐chloroanilinium hydrogen fumarate, C₆H₇ClN⁺·C₄H₃O₄⁻, (III), the asymmetric unit contains two symmetry‐independent hydrogen fumate anions and anilinium cations with a slight difference in their geometric parameters; the two salts are isostructural. In (II) and (III), the carboxylic acid H atoms of the anions are disordered across both ends of the anion, with equal site occupancies of 0.50. Both the 4‐chloroanilinium cations of (III) are disordered over two orientations with major occupancies fixed at 0.60 in each case. The hydrogen fumarate anions of (II) and (III) form one‐dimensional anionic chains linked through O—H...O hydrogen bonds. Salts (II) and (III) form two‐dimensional supramolecular sheets built from R₄⁴(16), R₄⁴(18), R₅⁵(25) and C₂²(14) motifs extending parallel to the (010) plane, whereas in (I), an (010) sheet is formed built from two R₄³(13) motifs, two R₂²(9) motifs and an R₄⁴(18) motif.     

Lagoden dimethylformamide hemisolvate dihydrate: absolute configuration,dipolar interactions and hydrogen‐bonding interactions

Lagoden (L·3H₂O, where L is Na⁺·C₂₀H₃₃O₆⁻; sodium 3β,16,18‐trihydroxy‐8,13‐epi‐9,13‐epoxylabdan‐15‐oate trihydrate) is widely used as an effective haemostatic agent. It has been crystallized from dimethylformamide (DMF) as sodium 3β,16,18‐trihydroxy‐8,13‐epi‐9,13‐epoxylabdan‐15‐oate dimethylformamide hemisolvate dihydrate, Na⁺·C₂₀H₃₃O₆⁻·0.5C₃H₇NO·2H₂O or L₂·DMF·4H₂O, and the asymmetric unit contains two of the latter formulation. The four symmetry‐independent Na⁺ cations and lagoden anions, one DMF molecule and six of the eight symmetry‐independent water molecules assemble into a one‐dimensional polymeric structure via dipolar and hydrogen‐bonding interactions. The lagoden anions coordinate to the Na⁺ cations via the carboxylate groups and the two primary hydroxy groups, whereas the secondary OH groups are solely involved in hydrogen bonding. Two of the four symmetry‐independent lagoden anions act in a chelating mode, forming seven‐membered chelate rings. The absolute structure, based on anomalous dispersion data collected at 130 K with Cu Kα radiation, confirms an inverted configuration at chiral centres C8 and C13 (labdane numbering) relative to the labdane skeleton.     

Naphthalene‐1,6‐diol: a three‐dimensional framework built from O—H...O,O—H...π and C—H...O hydrogen bonds

The asymmetric unit of the title compound, C₁₀H₈O₂, contains two practically planar symmetry‐independent molecules linked by one O—H...O hydrogen bond. Molecules are further linked into a three‐dimensional network, which is built from R₆⁶(36), R₆⁶(18), R₆⁶(30) and R₄⁴(26) rings formed by the combined effect of three O—H...O and one C—H...O hydrogen bond. This network is additionally stabilized by an O—H...π interaction.     

4‐Iodo­anilinium 3‐nitro­phthalate(1–): tripartite sheets built from O—H...O and N—H...O hydrogen bonds

In the title compound, 4‐iodoanilinium 2‐carboxy‐6‐nitrobenzoate, C₆H₇IN⁺·C₈H₄NO₆⁻, the anions are linked by an O—H...O hydrogen bond [H...O = 1.78 Å, O...O = 2.614 (3) Å and O—H...O = 171°] into C(7) chains, and these chains are linked by two two‐centre N—H...O hydrogen bonds [H...O = 1.86 and 1.92 Å, N...O = 2.700 (3) and 2.786 (3) Å, and N—H...O = 153 and 158°] and one three‐centre N—H...(O)₂ hydrogen bond [H...O = 2.02 and 2.41 Å, N...O = 2.896 (3) and 2.789 (3) Å, N—H...O = 162 and 105°, and O...H...O = 92°], thus forming sheets con­taining R(6), R(8), R(13) and R(18) rings.     

Short intermolecular N—Br...O=C contacts in 1,3‐dibromo‐5,5‐dimethylimidazolidine‐2,4‐dione

In the title compound, C₅H₆Br₂N₂O₂, all atoms except for the methyl group lie on a mirror plane in the space group Pnma (No. 62). All bond lengths are normal and the five‐membered ring is planar by symmetry. Two short intermolecular N—Br...O=C contacts [Br...O = 2.787 (2) and 2.8431 (19) Å] are present, originating primarily from the O‐atom lone pairs donating electron density to the antibonding orbitals of the N—Br bonds (delocalization energy transfers 3.27 and 2.11 kcal mol⁻¹). The total stabilization energies of the Br...O interactions are 3.4828 and 2.3504 kcal mol⁻¹.     

A pseudo‐quadruple hydrogen‐bonding motif consisting of six N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds in trimethoprim formate

The title compound, trimethoprim (TMP) formate [systematic name: 2,4‐di­amino‐5‐(3,4,5‐tri­methoxy­benzyl)­pyrimidin‐1‐ium formate], C₁₄H₁₉N₄O₃⁺·CHO₂^?, reveals a pseudo‐quadruple hydrogen‐bonding motif consisting of six N—H?O hydrogen bonds involving two unpaired TMP cations and two formate anions which are symmetrically disposed. The hydrogen‐bonding motif is strikingly comparable with that observed in other TMP salts where the amino­pyrimidine moieties of the TMP cations are centrosymmetrically paired. These conserved hydrogen‐bonding motifs may serve as robust synthons in crystal engineering and design. The characteristic pseudo‐quadruple hydrogen‐bonding motif and other intermolecular hydrogen bonds operating in the crystal form a two‐dimensional supramolecular sheet structure.