From Metallaborane to Borylene Complexes: Syntheses and Structures of Triply Bridged Ruthenium and Tantalum Borylene Complexes

Reaction of [1,2‐(Cp*RuH)₂B₃H₇] ( 1 ; Cp*=η⁵‐C₅Me₅) with [Mo(CO)₃(CH₃CN)₃] yielded arachno‐[(Cp*RuCO)₂B₂H₆] ( 2 ), which exhibits a butterfly structure, reminiscent of 7 sep B₄H₁₀. Compound 2 was found to be a very good precursor for the generation of bridged borylene species. Mild pyrolysis of 2 with [Fe₂(CO)₉] yielded a triply bridged heterotrinuclear borylene complex [(μ₃‐BH)(Cp*RuCO)₂(μ‐CO){Fe(CO)₃}] ( 3 ) and bis‐borylene complexes [{(μ₃‐BH)(Cp*Ru)(μ‐CO)}₂Fe₂(CO)₅] ( 4 ) and [{(μ₃‐BH)(Cp*Ru)Fe(CO)₃}₂(μ‐CO)] ( 5 ). In a similar fashion, pyrolysis of 2 with [Mn₂(CO)₁₀] permits the isolation of μ₃‐borylene complex [(μ₃‐BH)(Cp*RuCO)₂(μ‐H)(μ‐CO){Mn(CO)₃}] ( 6 ). Both compounds 3 and 6 have a trigonal‐pyramidal geometry with the μ₃‐BH ligand occupying the apical vertex, whereas 4 and 5 can be viewed as bicapped tetrahedra, with two μ₃‐borylene ligands occupying the capping position. The synthesis of tantalum borylene complex [(μ₃‐BH)(Cp*TaCO)₂(μ‐CO){Fe(CO)₃}] ( 7 ) was achieved by the reaction of [(Cp*Ta)₂B₄H₈(μ‐BH₄)] at ambient temperature with [Fe₂(CO)₉]. Compounds 2 – 7 have been isolated in modest yield as yellow to red crystalline solids. All the new compounds have been characterized in solution by mass spectrometry; IR spectroscopy; and ¹H, ¹¹B, and ¹³C NMR spectroscopy and the structural types were unequivocally established by crystallographic analysis of 2 – 6 .     

First‐Row Transition‐Metal–Diborane and –Borylene Complexes

A combined experimental and quantum chemical study of Group 7 borane, trimetallic triply bridged borylene and boride complexes has been undertaken. Treatment of [{Cp*CoCl}₂] (Cp*=1,2,3,4,5‐pentamethylcyclopentadienyl) with LiBH₄ ? thf at ?78 °C, followed by room‐temperature reaction with three equivalents of [Mn₂(CO)₁₀] yielded a manganese hexahydridodiborate compound [{(OC)₄Mn}(η⁶‐B₂H₆){Mn(CO)₃}₂(μ‐H)] ( 1 ) and a triply bridged borylene complex [(μ₃‐BH)(Cp*Co)₂(μ‐CO)(μ‐H)₂MnH(CO)₃] ( 2 ). In a similar fashion, [Re₂(CO)₁₀] generated [(μ₃‐BH)(Cp*Co)₂(μ‐CO)(μ‐H)₂ReH(CO)₃] ( 3 ) and [(μ₃‐BH)(Cp*Co)₂(μ‐CO)₂(μ‐H)Co(CO)₃] ( 4 ) in modest yields. In contrast, [Ru₃(CO)₁₂] under similar reaction conditions yielded a heterometallic semi‐interstitial boride cluster [(Cp*Co)(μ‐H)₃Ru₃(CO)₉B] ( 5 ). The solid‐state X‐ray structure of compound 1 shows a significantly shorter boron–boron bond length. The detailed spectroscopic data of 1 and the unusual structural and bonding features have been described. All the complexes have been characterized by using ¹H, ¹¹B, ¹³C NMR spectroscopy, mass spectrometry, and X‐ray diffraction analysis. The DFT computations were used to shed light on the bonding and electronic structures of these new compounds. The study reveals a dominant B?H?Mn, a weak B?B?Mn interaction, and an enhanced B?B bonding in 1 .     

Syntheses and Characterization of New Vinyl‐Borylene Complexes by the Hydroboration of Alkynes with [(μ3‐BH)(Cp*RuCO)2(μ‐CO)Fe(CO)3]

Room temperature photolysis of a triply‐bridged borylene complex, [(μ₃‐BH)(Cp*RuCO)₂(μ‐CO)Fe(CO)₃] ( 1 a ; Cp*=C₅Me₅), in the presence of a series of alkynes, 1,2‐diphenylethyne, 1‐phenyl‐1‐propyne, and 2‐butyne led to the isolation of unprecedented vinyl‐borylene complexes (Z)‐[(Cp*RuCO)₂(μ‐CO)B(CR)(CHR′)] ( 2 : R, R′=Ph; 3 : R=Me, R′=Ph; 4 : R, R′=Me). This reaction permits a hydroboration of alkyne through an anti ‐ Markovnikov addition. In stark contrast, in the presence of phenylacetylene, a metallacarborane, closo‐[1,2‐(Cp*Ru)₂(μ‐CO)₂{Fe₂(CO)₅}‐4‐Ph‐4,5‐C₂BH₂] ( 5 a) , is formed. A plausible mechanism has been proposed for the formation of vinyl‐borylene complexes, which is supported by density functional theory (DFT) methods. Furthermore, the calculated ¹¹B NMR chemical shifts accurately reflect the experimentally measured shifts. All the new compounds have been characterized in solution by mass spectrometry and IR, ¹H, ¹¹B, and ¹³C NMR spectroscopies and the structural types were unequivocally established by crystallographic analysis of 2 , 5 a , and 5 b .     

Manganese‐σ‐Borane Complexes from Dihaloboranes

The hydride complex K[(η⁵‐C₅H₅)Mn(CO)₂H] reacted with a range of dihalo(organyl)boranes X₂BR (X = Cl, Br; R = tBu,Mes, Ferrocenyl) to give the corresponding borane complexes[(η⁵‐C₅H₅)Mn(CO)₂(HB(X)R)]., The presence of a hydride in bridging position between manganese and boron was deduced from ¹¹B decoupled ¹H NMR spectra. Additionally, the structure of the tert‐butyl borane complex was confirmed by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction.     

Insertion Reactions of Neutral Phosphidozirconocene Complexes as a Convenient Entry into Frustrated Lewis Pair Territory

Neutral phosphidozirconocene complexes [Cp₂Zr(PR₂)Me] (Cp=cyclopentadienyl; 1a : R=cyclohexyl (Cy); 1b : R=mesityl (Mes); 1c : R=tBu) undergo insertion into the Zr?P bond by non‐enolisable carbonyl building blocks (O=CR′R′′), such as benzophenone, aldehydes, paraformaldehyde or CO₂, to give [Cp₂Zr(OCR′R′′PR₂)Me] ( 3 – 7 ). Depending on the steric bulk around P, complexes 3 – 7 react with B(C₆F₅)₃ to give O‐bridged cationic zirconocene dimers that display typical frustrated Lewis pair (FLP)/ambiphilic ligand behaviour. Thus, the reaction of {[Cp₂Zr(μ‐OCHPhPCy₂)][MeB(C₆F₅)₃]}₂ ( 10a ) with chalcone results in 1,4 addition of the Zr⁺/P FLP, whereas the reaction of {[Cp₂Zr(μ‐OCHFcPCy₂)][MeB(C₆F₅)₃]}₂ ( 11a ; Fc=(C₅H₄)CpFe) with [Pd(η³‐C₃H₅)Cl]₂ yields the unique Zr?Fe?Pd trimetallic complex 13a , which has been characterised by XRD analysis.     

New Trinuclear Complexes of Group 6, 8, and 9 Metals with a Triply Bridging Borylene Ligand

Trinuclear complexes of group 6, 8, and 9 transition metals with a (μ₃‐BH) ligand [(μ₃‐BH)(Cp*Rh)₂(μ‐CO)M′(CO)₅], 3 and 4 ( 3 : M′=Mo; 4 : M′=W) and 5 – 8 , [(Cp*Ru)₃(μ₃‐CO)₂(μ₃‐BH)(μ₃‐E)(μ‐H){M′(CO)₃}] ( 5 : M′=Cr, E=CO; 6 : M′=Mo, E=CO; 7 : M′=Mo, E=BH; 8 : M′=W, E=CO), have been synthesized from the reaction between nido‐[(Cp*M)₂B₃H₇] (nido‐ 1 : M=Rh; nido‐ 2 : M=RuH, Cp*=η⁵‐C₅Me₅) and [M′(CO)₅ ? thf] (M′=Mo and W). Compounds 3 and 4 are isoelectronic and isostructural with [(μ₃‐BH)(Cp*Co)₂(μ‐CO)M′(CO)₅], (M′=Cr, Mo and W) and [(μ₃‐BH)(Cp*Co)₂(μ‐CO)(μ‐H)₂M′′H(CO)₃], (M′′=Mn and Re). All compounds are composed of a bridging borylene ligand (B?H) that is effectively stabilized by a trinuclear framework. In contrast, the reaction of nido‐ 1 with [Cr(CO)₅ ? thf] gave [(Cp*Rh)₂Cr(CO)₃(μ‐CO)(μ₃‐BH)(B₂H₄)] ( 9 ). The geometry of 9 can be viewed as a condensed polyhedron composed of [Rh₂Cr(μ₃‐BH)] and [Rh₂CrB₂], a tetrahedral and a square pyramidal geometry, respectively. The bonding of 9 can be considered by using the polyhedral fusion formalism of Mingos. All compounds have been characterized by using different spectroscopic studies and the molecular structures were determined by using single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction analysis.     

The Synthesis of (η3‐C3H5)Pd{Si[N(tBu)CH]2}Cl and the Catalytic Property for Heck Reaction

Treatment of N‐heterocyclic silylene Si[N(^tBu)CH]₂ ( 1 ) and [(η³‐C₃H₅)PdCl]₂ in toluene led to the formation of the mononuclear complex (η³‐C₃H₅)Pd{Si[N(^tBu)CH]₂}Cl ( 3 ), the silicon analogue to N‐heterocyclic carbene complex (η³‐C₃H₅)Pd{C[N(^tBu)CH]₂}Cl ( 2 ). Complex 3 was characterized with ¹H NMR and ¹³C NMR. Investigation shows that (η³‐C₃H₅)Pd{Si[N(^tBu)CH]₂}Cl is an active catalyst for Heck coupling reaction of styrene with aryl bromides.     

Heterometallic Triply‐Bridging Bis‐Borylene Complexes

Triply‐bridging bis‐{hydrido(borylene)} and bis‐borylene species of groups 6, 8 and 9 transition metals are reported. Mild thermolysis of [Fe₂(CO)₉] with an in situ produced intermediate, generated from the low‐temperature reaction of [Cp*WCl₄] (Cp*=η⁵‐C₅Me₅) and [LiBH₄?THF] afforded triply‐bridging bis‐{hydrido(borylene)}, [(μ₃‐BH)₂H₂{Cp*W(CO)₂}₂{Fe(CO)₂}] ( 1 ) and bis‐borylene, [(μ₃‐BH)₂{Cp*W(CO)₂}₂{Fe(CO)₃}] ( 2 ). The chemical bonding analyses of 1 show that the B?H interactions in bis‐{hydrido (borylene)} species is stronger as compared to the M?H ones. Frontier molecular orbital analysis shows a significantly larger energy gap between the HOMO‐LUMO for 2 as compared to 1 . In an attempt to synthesize the ruthenium analogue of 1 , a similar reaction has been performed with [Ru₃(CO)₁₂]. Although we failed to get the bis‐{hydrido(borylene)} species, the reaction afforded triply‐bridging bis‐borylene species [(μ₃‐BH)₂{WCp*(CO)₂}₂{Ru(CO)₃}] ( 2′ ), an analogue of 2 . In search for the isolation of bridging bis‐borylene species of Rh, we have treated [Co₂(CO)₈] with nido‐[(RhCp*)₂(B₃H₇)], which afforded triply‐bridging bis‐borylene species [(μ₃‐BH)₂(RhCp*)₂Co₂(CO)₄(μ‐CO)] ( 3 ). All the compounds have been characterized by means of single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction study; ¹H, ¹¹B, ¹³C NMR spectroscopy; IR spectroscopy and mass spectrometry.     

N‐Functionalized Ferrocenes: Subvalent Group XIV Element Chlorides and tert‐Butyllithium‐Induced C−C Bond Cleavage under Mild Conditions

The ferrocene derivative (η⁵‐Cp)Fe{η⁵‐C₅H₃‐1‐(ArNCH)‐2‐(CH₂NMe₂)} ( 1 ; Ar=2,6‐iPr₂C₆H₃)) reacts diastereoselectively with LiR by carbolithiation and subsequent hydrolysis to give (η⁵‐Cp)Fe{η⁵‐C₅H₃‐1‐(ArHNCHR)‐2‐(CH₂NMe₂)} ( 3 : R=tBu; 4 : R=Ph; 5 : R=Me) in high yields. For R=tBu, the organolithium derivative (η⁵‐Cp)Fe{η⁵‐C₅H₃‐1‐(ArLiNCHR)‐2‐(CH₂NMe₂)} ( 2 ) was isolated. Compound 2 reacts with GeCl₂?dioxane and SnCl₂ to give the metallylene amide chlorides (η⁵‐Cp)Fe{η⁵‐C₅H₃‐1‐(ArMNCHtBu)‐2‐(CH₂NMe₂)} 6 (M=GeCl) and 7 (M=SnCl), respectively, which each contain three stereogenic centers. The potential of 7 as a ligand in transition‐metal chemistry is demonstrated by formation of its complex (η⁵‐Cp)Fe{η⁵‐C₅H₃‐1‐(ArMNCHtBu)‐2‐(CH₂NMe₂)} [ 9 , M= Sn(Cl)W(CO)₅]. Treatment of 3 with tert‐butyllithium at room temperature causes an unprecedented carbon–carbon bond cleavage whereas under kinetic control, lithiation at the Cp‐3 position takes place, which leads to the isolation of (η⁵‐Cp)Fe{η⁵‐C₅H₃‐1‐(ArHNCHtBu)‐2‐(CH₂NMe₂)‐3‐SiMe₃} ( 10 ).     

Yttrium Complexes of Arsine,Arsenide, and Arsinidene Ligands

Deprotonation of the yttrium–arsine complex [Cp′₃Y{As(H)₂Mes}] ( 1 ) (Cp′=η⁵‐C₅H₄Me, Mes=mesityl) by nBuLi produces the μ‐arsenide complex [{Cp′₂Y[μ‐As(H)Mes]}₃] ( 2 ). Deprotonation of the As H bonds in 2 by nBuLi produces [Li(thf)₄]₂[{Cp′₂Y(μ₃‐AsMes)}₃Li], [Li(thf)₄]₂[ 3 ], in which the dianion 3 contains the first example of an arsinidene ligand in rare‐earth metal chemistry. The molecular structures of the arsine, arsenide, and arsinidene complexes are described, and the yttrium–arsenic bonding is analyzed by density functional theory.     

Stepwise Strategy to Cyclometallated PtII Complexes with N‐Heterocyclic Carbene Ligands: A Luminescence Study on New β‐Diketonate Complexes

The imidazolium salt 3‐methyl‐1‐(naphthalen‐2‐yl)‐1H‐imidazolium iodide ( 2 ) has been treated with silver(I) oxide and [{Pt(μ‐Cl)(η³‐2‐Me‐C₃H₄)}₂] (η³‐2‐Me‐C₃H₄=η³‐2‐methylallyl) to give the intermediate N‐heterocyclic carbene complex [PtCl(η³‐2‐Me‐C₃H₄)(H$\widehat{CC}$ *‐κC*)] ( 3 ) (H$\widehat{CC}$ *‐κC*=3‐methyl‐1‐(naphthalen‐2‐yl)‐1H‐imidazol‐2‐ylidene). Compound 3 undergoes regiospecific cyclometallation at the naphthyl ring of the NHC ligand to give the five‐membered platinacycle compound [{Pt(μ‐Cl)($\widehat{CC}$ *)}₂] ( 4 ). Chlorine abstraction from 4 with β‐diketonate Tl derivatives rendered the corresponding neutral compounds [Pt($\widehat{CC}$ *)(L‐O,O′)] {L=acac (HL=acetylacetone) 5 , phacac (HL=1,3‐diphenyl‐1,3‐propanedione) 6 , hfacac (HL=hexafluoroacetylacetone) 7 }. All of the compounds ( 3 – 7 ) were fully characterized by standard spectroscopic and analytical methods. X‐ray diffraction studies were performed on 5 – 7 , revealing short Pt?Pt and π–π interactions in the solid‐state structure. The influence of the R‐substituents of the β‐diketonate ligand on the photophysical properties and the use of the most efficient emitter, 5 , as phosphor converter has also been studied.     

Yttrium Complexes of Arsine,Arsenide, and Arsinidene Ligands

Deprotonation of the yttrium–arsine complex [Cp′₃Y{As(H)₂Mes}] ( 1 ) (Cp′=η⁵‐C₅H₄Me, Mes=mesityl) by nBuLi produces the μ‐arsenide complex [{Cp′₂Y[μ‐As(H)Mes]}₃] ( 2 ). Deprotonation of the As? H bonds in 2 by nBuLi produces [Li(thf)₄]₂[{Cp′₂Y(μ₃‐AsMes)}₃Li], [Li(thf)₄]₂[ 3 ], in which the dianion 3 contains the first example of an arsinidene ligand in rare‐earth metal chemistry. The molecular structures of the arsine, arsenide, and arsinidene complexes are described, and the yttrium–arsenic bonding is analyzed by density functional theory.     

Formation and Reactivity of an Aluminabenzene Ligand at Pentadienyl‐Supported Rare‐Earth Metals

The half‐open rare‐earth‐metal aluminabenzene complexes [(1‐Me‐3,5‐tBu₂‐C₅H₃Al)(μ‐Me)Ln(2,4‐dtbp)] (Ln=Y, Lu) are accessible via a salt metathesis reaction employing Ln(AlMe₄)₃ and K(2,4‐dtbp). Treatment of the yttrium complex with B(C₆F₅)₃ and tBuCCH gives access to the pentafluorophenylalane complex [{1‐(C₆F₅)‐3,5‐tBu₂‐C₅H₃Al}{μ‐C₆F₅}Y{2,4‐dtbp}] and the mixed vinyl acetylide complex [(2,4‐dtbp)Y(μ‐η¹:η³‐2,4‐tBu₂‐C₅H₄)(μ‐CCtBu)AlMe₂], respectively.     

Lewis Base Behavior of Bridging Nitrido Ligands of Titanium Polynuclear Complexes

The Lewis base behavior of μ₃‐nitrido ligands of the polynuclear titanium complexes [{Ti(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)(μ‐NH)}₃(μ₃‐N)] ( 1 ) and [{Ti(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)}₄(μ₃‐N)₄] ( 2 ) to MX Lewis acids has been observed for the first time. Complex 1 entraps one equivalent of copper(I ) halide or copper(I ) trifluoromethanesulfonate through the basal NH imido groups to give cube‐type adducts [XCu{(μ₃‐NH)₃Ti₃(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)₃(μ₃‐N)}] (X=Cl ( 3 ), Br ( 4 ), I ( 5 ), OSO₂CF₃ ( 6 )). However, the treatment of 1 with an excess (≥2 equiv) of copper reagents afforded complexes [XCu{(μ₃‐NH)₃Ti₃(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)₃(μ₄‐N)(CuX)}] (X=Cl ( 7 ), Br ( 8 ), I ( 9 ), OSO₂CF₃ ( 10 )) by incorporation of an additional CuX fragment at the μ₃‐N nitrido apical group. Similarly, the tetranuclear cube‐type nitrido derivative 2 is capable of incorporating one, two, or up to three CuX units at the μ₃‐N ligands to give complexes [{Ti(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)}₄(μ₃‐N)_4?n{(μ₄‐N)CuX}_n] (X=Br ( 11 ), n=1; X=Cl ( 12 ), n=2; X=OSO₂CF₃ ( 13 ), n=3). Compound 2 also reacts with silver(I ) trifluoromethanesulfonate (≥1 equiv) to give the adduct [{Ti(η⁵‐C₅Me₅)}₄(μ₃‐N)₃{(μ₄‐N)AgOSO₂CF₃}] ( 14 ). X‐ray crystal structure determinations have been performed for complexes 8 – 13 . Density functional theory calculations have been carried out to understand the nature and strength of the interactions of [{Ti(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(μ‐NH)}₃(μ₃‐N)] ( 1′ ) and [{Ti(η⁵‐C₅H₅)}₄(μ₃‐N)₄] ( 2′ ) model complexes with copper and silver MX fragments. Although coordination through the three basal NH imido groups is thermodynamically preferred in the case of 1′ , in both complexes the μ₃‐nitrido groups act as two‐electron donor Lewis bases to the appropriate Lewis acids.     

Ligand Bridged Heterodinuclear Transition Metal Complexes – Syntheses,Structures and Electrochemical Investigations

The syntheses of the homo‐ and hererobimetallic compounds [L_n¹M(η⁵‐C₅H₄)CMe₂(η⁵‐C₉H₆)²ML_n] ( 2a‐5d ), [(C₉H₇)CMe₂(η⁵‐C₅H₄)Fe(η⁵‐C₅H₄)CMe₂(η⁵‐C₉H₆)²ML_n] ( 6a‐c ), and [(η⁵‐C₅H₄)CMe₂(η⁵‐C₉H₆)²ML_n]₂Fe ( 7a‐b ) are reported with ¹ML_n = Rh(cod) 2 , Ir(cod) 3 , Mn(CO)₃ 4 and FeCp 5 , ²ML_n = Rh(cod) a , Ir(cod) b , Mn(CO)₃ c and FeCp d , respectively. Crystal structures of 3a, 3b and 5c are described showing two different ligand conformations in form of two rotamers. The energetic difference between these both rotamers is insignificant small in the gas phase according to DFT calculations. The rotation barrier for the species has been determined to 23 kJ/mol. According to the absence of intermolecular interactions in the solid state, the preference for one of the conformers is deduced from packing effects. All complexes are investigated by cyclic voltammetry. The shift of the redox potentials with respect to the mononuclear reference systems is a suitable tool to determine intermetallic electronic interaction. For some compounds, the normal behaviour with an increasing separation of the redox potentials is observed. A second group of complexes shows the opposite behaviour with a decreasing in the potential differences. A mechanism of intramolecular catalytic oxidation is supposed for that species.     

Palladium(II) compounds with planar chirality. X-Ray crystal structures of (+)-(R)-[{(η5-C5H4)–CHN–CH(Me)–C10H7}Fe(η5-C5H5)] and (+)-(Rp,R)-[Pd{[(Et–CC–Et)2(η5-C5H3)–CHN–CH(Me)–C10H7]Fe(η5-C5H5)}Cl]

A wide variety of planar chiral cyclopalladated compounds of general formulae [Pd{[(η⁵-C₅H₃)–CHN–CH(Me)–C₁₀H₇]Fe(η⁵-C₅H₅)}Cl(L)] (with L=py-d₅ or PPh₃), [Pd{[(η⁵-C₅H₃)–CHN–CH(Me)–C₁₀H₇]Fe(η⁵-C₅H₅)}(acac)] or [Pd{[(R¹–CC–R²)₂(η⁵-C₅H₃)–CHN–CH(Me)–C₁₀H₇]Fe(η⁵-C₅H₅)}Cl] (with R¹=R²=Et; R¹=Me, R²=Ph; R¹=H, R²=Ph; R¹=R²=Ph; R¹=R²=CO₂Me or R¹=CO₂Et, R²=Ph) are reported. The diastereomers {(R_p,R) and (S_p,R)} of these compounds have been isolated by either column chromatography or fractional crystallization. The free ligand (R)-(+)-[{(η⁵-C₅H₄)–CHN–CH(Me)–C₁₀H₇}Fe(η⁵–C₅H₅)] (1) and compound (+)-(R_p,R)-[Pd{[(Et–CC–Et)₂(η⁵-C₅H₃)–CHN–CH(Me)–C₁₀H₇]Fe(η⁵-C₅H₅)}Cl] (7a) have also been characterized by X-ray diffraction. Electrochemical studies based on cyclic voltammetries of all the compounds are also reported.     

Halfsandwich Carbonylmetal Complexes of Vanadium,Chromium, and Manganese Containing Tri(1‐cyclohepta‐2, 4, 6‐trienyl)phosphane,P(C7H7)3

The photo‐induced substitution of a CO ligand has been used to prepare the halfsandwich complexes (η³‐C₃H₅)V(CO)₄[P(C₇H₇)₃] ( 1 ), (η⁵‐C₅H₅)V(CO)₃[P(C₇H₇)₃] ( 2 ), (η⁷‐C₇H₇)V(CO)₂[P(C₇H₇)₃] ( 3 ), (η⁶‐C₆H₃Me₃)Cr(CO)₂[P(C₇H₇)₃] ( 4 ), and (η⁵‐C₅H₅)Mn(CO)₂[P(C₇H₇)₃] ( 7 ), in which the olefinic phosphane is coordinated as a conventional two‐electron ligand through the lone pair of electrons at phosphorus. Some analogues, which are permethylated at the aromatic ring ( 2* , 4* , 7* ), were included for comparison. Subsequent photo‐elimination of another CO group from 4 or 7 converts the olefinic phosphane into a chelating four‐electron ligand, leading to (η⁶‐C₆H₃Me₃)Cr(CO)[P(C₇H₇)₂(η²‐C₇H₇)] ( 5 ) and (η⁵‐C₅H₅)Mn(CO)[P(C₇H₇)₂(η²‐C₇H₇)] ( 8 ), respectively. The η²‐coordinated double bond in 5 and 8 can be displaced by trimethylphosphite to give (η⁶‐C₆H₃Me₃)Cr(CO)[P(C₇H₇)₃][P(OMe)₃] ( 6 ) and (η⁵‐C₅H₅)Mn(CO)[P(C₇H₇)₃][P(OMe)₃] ( 9 ). The ³¹P and ¹³C NMR spectra of all complexes are discussed, and X‐ray structure analyses for 2 and 8 are presented. Prolonged irradiation of 7 and 8 led to a di(cycloheptatrienyl)phosphido‐bridged dimer, {(η⁵‐C₅H₅)Mn(CO)[P(C₇H₇)₂]}₂( 10 ).     

Clusterkomplexe [M2Rh(μ‐PCy2)(μ‐CO)2(CO)8] mit triangularem Metallgerüst RhM2 (M = Mn,Re; M2 = MnRe): Synthese,Struktur, Ringöffnungen und Katalysatoreigenschaften für die Isomerisierung und Hydroformylierung von 1‐Hexen

Cluster Complexes [M₂Rh(μ‐PCy₂)(μ‐CO)₂(CO)₈] with Triangular Core of RhM₂ (M = Re, Mn; M₂ = MnRe): Synthesis, Structure, Ring Opening Reaction, and Properties as Catalysts for Hydroformylation and Isomerisation of 1‐Hexene The salts PPh₄[M₂(μ‐H)(μ‐PCy₂)(CO)₈] and Rh(COD)[ClO₄] were in equimolar amounts reacted at –40 to –15 °C in the presence of CO_(g) in CH₂Cl₂/methanol solution under release of PPh₄[ClO₄] to intermediates. Such species formed in a selective reaction the unifold unsaturated 46 valence electrons title compounds [M₂Rh(μ‐PCy₂)(μ‐CO)₂(CO)₈] (M = Re 1 , Mn 2 ; M₂ = MnRe 3 ) in yields of > 90%; analogeous the derivatives with the PPh₂ bridge could the obtained (M = Re 4 , Mn 5 ). From these clusters the molecular structure of 2 was determined by a single crystal X‐ray analysis. The exchange of the labil CO ligand attached at the rhodium ring atom in 1 – 3 against selected tertiary and secondary phosphanes in solution gave the substitution products [M₂RhL(μ‐PCy₂)(μ‐CO)₂(CO)₇] (M = Re: L = PMe₃ 6 , P(n‐Bu)₃ 7 , P(n‐C₆H₄SO₃Na)₃ 8 , HPCy₂ 9 , HPPh₂ 10 , HPMen₂ 11 , M₂ = MnRe: L = HPCy₂ 12 ) nearly quantitative. Such dimanganese rhodium intermediates ligated with secondary phosphanes were converted in a subsequent reaction to the ring‐opened complexes [MnRh(μ‐PCy₂)(μ‐H)(CO)₅Mn(μ‐PR₂)(CO)₄] (M = Mn: R = Cy 13 , Ph 14 , Mn 15 ). The molecular structure of 13 , which showed in the time scale of the ³¹P NMR method a fluxional behaviour, was determined by X‐ray structure analysis. All products obtained were always characterized by means of υ(CO)Ir, ¹H and ³¹P NMR measurements. From the reactants of hydroformylation process, CO_(g) 1 – 2 in different solvents afforded at 20 °C under a reversible ring opening reaction the valence‐saturated complexes [MRh(μ‐PCy₂)(CO)₇M(CO)₅] (M = Re 16 , Mn 17 ), whereas the reaction of CO_(g) and the ring‐opened 13 to [MnRh(μ‐PCy₂)(μ‐H)(CO)₆Mn(μ‐PCy₂)(CO)₄] ( 18 ) was as well reversible. The molecular structures of 17 and 18 were determined by X‐ray analysis. The υ(CO)IR, ¹H and ³¹P NMR measurements in pressure‐resistant reaction vessels at 20 °C ascertained the heterolytic splitting of hydrogen in the reaction of 1 – 2 dissolved in CDCl₃ or THF‐d₈ under formation of product monoanions [M₂Rh(μ‐CO)(μ‐H)(μ‐PCy₂)(CO)₉]^– (M = Re, Mn), which also were formed by the reaction of NaBH₄ and 1 – 2 . Finally, the substrate 1‐hexene and 1 and 3 gave under the release of the labil CO ligand an η²‐coordination pattern of hexene, which was weekened going from the Re to the Mn neighbor atoms. After the results of the catalytic experiments with 1 and 2 as catalysts, such change in the bonding property revealed an advantageous formation of hydroformylation products for the dirhenium rhodium catalyst 1 and that of isomerisation products of hexene for the dimanganese rhodium catalyst 2 . Par example, 1 generated n‐heptanal/2‐methylhexanal in TOF values of 246 [h^–1] (n/iso = 3.4) and the c,t‐hexenes in that of 241 [h^–1]. Opposotite to this, 2 achieved such values of 55 [h^–1] (n/iso = 3.6) and 473 [h^–1]. A triphenylphosphane substitution product of 1 increased the activity of the hydroformylation reaction about 20%, accompanied by an only gradually improved selectivity. The hydrogenation products like alcohols and saturated hydrocarbons known from industrial hydroformylation processes were not observed. The metals manganese and rhenium bound at the rhodium reaction center showed a cooperative effect.     

Insight into the structures of [M(C5H4I)(CO)3] and [M2(C12H8)(CO)6] (M = Mn and Re) containing strong I...O and π(CO)–π(CO) interactions

The compounds tricarbonyl(η⁵‐1‐iodocyclopentadienyl)manganese(I), [Mn(C₅H₄I)(CO)₃], (I), and tricarbonyl(η⁵‐1‐iodocyclopentadienyl)rhenium(I), [Re(C₅H₄I)(CO)₃], (III), are isostructural and isomorphous. The compounds [μ‐1,2(η⁵)‐acetylenedicyclopentadienyl]bis[tricarbonylmanganese(I)] or bis(cymantrenyl)acetylene, [Mn₂(C₁₂H₈)(CO)₆], (II), and [μ‐1,2(η⁵)‐acetylenedicyclopentadienyl]bis[tricarbonylrhenium(I)], [Re₂(C₁₂H₈)(CO)₆], (IV), are isostructural and isomorphous, and their molecules display inversion symmetry about the mid‐point of the ligand C[triple‐bond]C bond, with the (CO)₃M(C₅H₄) (M = Mn and Re) moieties adopting a transoid conformation. The molecules in all four compounds form zigzag chains due to the formation of strong attractive I...O [in (I) and (III)] or π(CO)–π(CO) [in (I) and (IV)] interactions along the crystallographic b axis. The zigzag chains are bound to each other by weak intermolecular C—H...O hydrogen bonds for (I) and (III), while for (II) and (IV) the chains are bound to each other by a combination of weak C—H...O hydrogen bonds and π(Csp²)–π(Csp²) stacking interactions between pairs of molecules. The π(CO)–π(CO) contacts in (II) and (IV) between carbonyl groups of neighboring molecules, forming pairwise interactions in a sheared antiparallel dimer motif, are encountered in only 35% of all carbonyl interactions for transition metal–carbonyl compounds.     

Synthese,Struktur und Reaktivität von η3‐1,2‐Diphosphaallylkomplexen sowie von [{(η5‐C5H5)(CO)2W–Co(CO)3}{μ‐AsCH(SiMe3)2}(μ‐CO)]

Syntheses, Structure and Reactivity of η³‐1,2‐Diphosphaallyl Complexes and [{(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₂W–Co(CO)₃}{μ‐AsCH(SiMe₃)₂}(μ‐CO)] Reaction of ClP=C(SiMe₂iPr)₂ ( 3 ) with Na[Mo(CO)₃(η⁵‐C₅H₅)] afforded the phosphavinylidene complex [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₂Mo=P=C(SiMe₂iPr)₂] ( 4 ) which in situ was converted into the η¹‐1,2‐diphosphaallyl complex [η⁵‐(C₅H₅)(CO)₂Mo{η³‐tBuPPC(SiMe₂iPr)₂] ( 6 ) by treatment with the phosphaalkene tBuP=C(NMe₂)₂. The chloroarsanyl complexes [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₃M–As(Cl)CH(SiMe₃)₂] [where M = Mo ( 9 ); M = W ( 10 )] resulted from the reaction of Na[M(CO)₃(η⁵‐C₅H₅)] (M = Mo, W) with Cl₂AsCH(SiMe₃)₂. The tungsten derivative 10 and Na[Co(CO)₄] underwent reaction to give the dinuclear μ‐arsinidene complex [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₂W–Co(CO)₃{μ‐AsCH(SiMe₃)₂}(μ‐CO)] ( 11 ). Treatment of [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₂Mo{η³‐tBuPPC(SiMe₃)₂}] ( 1 ) with an equimolar amount of ethereal HBF₄ gave rise to a 85/15 mixture of the saline complexes [(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(CO)₂Mo{η²‐tBu(H)P–P(F)CH(SiMe₃)₂}]BF₄ ( 18 ) and [Cp(CO)₂Mo{F₂PCH(SiMe₃)₂}(tBuPH₂)]BF₄ ( 19 ) by HF‐addition to the PC bond of the η³‐diphosphaallyl ligand and subsequent protonation ( 18 ) and/or scission of the PP bond by the acid ( 19 ). Consistently 19 was the sole product when 1 was allowed to react with an excess of ethereal HBF₄. The products 6 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 18 and 19 were characterized by means of spectroscopy (IR, ¹H‐, ¹³C{¹H}‐, ³¹P{¹H}‐NMR, MS). Moreover, the molecular structures of 6 , 11 and 18 were determined by X‐ray diffraction analysis.