Phenyl‐ring rotational disorder in the two‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded structure of the 1:1 proton‐transfer salt of the diazo‐dye precursor 4‐(phenyldiazenyl)aniline (aniline yellow) with l‐tartaric acid

In the structure of the 1:1 proton‐transfer compound from the reaction of l ‐tartaric acid with the azo‐dye precursor aniline yellow [4‐(phenyldiazenyl)aniline], namely 4‐(phenyldiazenyl)anilinium (2R,3R)‐3‐carboxy‐2,3‐dihydroxypropanoate, C₁₂H₁₂N₃⁺·C₄H₅O₆⁻, the asymmetric unit contains two independent 4‐(phenyldiazenyl)anilinium cations and two hydrogen l ‐tartrate anions. The structure is unusual in that all four phenyl rings of the two cations have identical rotational disorder with equal occupancy of the conformations. The two hydrogen l ‐tartrate anions form independent but similar chains through head‐to‐tail carboxyl–carboxylate O—H...O hydrogen bonds [graph set C(7)], which are then extended into a two‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded sheet structure through hydroxy O—H...O hydrogen‐bonded links. The anilinium groups of the 4‐(phenyldiazenyl)anilinium cations are incorporated into the sheets and also provide internal hydrogen‐bonded extensions, while their aromatic tails are layered in the structure without significant association except for weak π–π interactions [minimum ring centroid separation = 3.844 (3) Å]. The hydrogen l ‐tartrate residues of both anions exhibit the common short intramolecular hydroxy–carboxylate O—H...O hydogen bonds. This work provides a solution to the unusual disorder problem inherent in the structure of this salt, as well as giving another example of the utility of the hydrogen tartrate anion in the generation of sheet substructures in molecular assembly processes.     

The 1:1 proton‐transfer compounds of 4‐(phenyldiazenyl)aniline (aniline yellow) with 3‐nitrophthalic, 4‐nitrophthalic and 5‐nitroisophthalic acids

The structures of the anhydrous 1:1 proton‐transfer compounds of the dye precursor aniline yellow [4‐(phenyldiazenyl)aniline], namely isomeric 4‐(phenyldiazenyl)anilinium 2‐carboxy‐6‐nitrobenzoate, C₁₂H₁₂N₃⁺·C₈H₄NO₆⁻, (I), and 4‐(phenyldiazenyl)anilinium 2‐carboxy‐4‐nitrobenzoate, C₁₂H₁₂N₃⁺·C₈H₄NO₆⁻, (II), and 4‐(phenyldiazenyl)anilinium 3‐carboxy‐5‐nitrobenzoate monohydrate, C₁₂H₁₂N₃⁺·C₈H₄NO₆⁻·H₂O, (III), have been determined at 130 K. In (I) the cation has longitudinal rotational disorder. All three compounds have substructures comprising backbones formed through strong head‐to‐tail carboxyl–carboxylate hydrogen‐bond interactions [graph set C(7) in (I) and (II), and C(8) in (III)]. Two‐dimensional sheet structures are formed in all three compounds by the incorporation of the 4‐(phenyldiazenyl)anilinium cations into the substructures, including, in the cases of (I) and (II), infinite H—N—H to carboxylate O—C—O group interactions [graph set C(6)], and in the case of (III), bridging through the water molecule of solvation. The peripheral alternating aromatic ring residues of both cations and anions give only weakly π‐interactive step features which lie between the sheets.     

4‐Methoxy‐1‐naphthol: chains formed by O—H...O hydrogen bonds and π–π stacking interactions

The structure of 4‐methoxy‐1‐naphthol, C₁₁H₁₀O₂, (I), contains an intermolecular O—H...O hydrogen bond which links the molecules into a simple C(2) chain running parallel to the shortest crystallographic b axis. This chain is reinforced by intermolecular π–π stacking interactions. Comparisons are drawn between the crystal structure of (I) and those of several of its simple analogues, including 1‐naphthol and some monosubstituted derivatives, and that of its isomer 7‐methoxy‐2‐naphthol. This comparison shows a close similarity in the packing of the molecules of its simple analogues that form π‐stacks along the shortest crystallographic axes. A substantial spatial overlap is observed between adjacent molecules in such stacks. In this group of monosubstituted naphthols, the overlap depends mainly on the position of the substituents carried by the naphthalene moiety, and the extent of the overlap depends on the substituent type. By contrast with (I), in the crystal structure of the isomeric 7‐methoxy‐2‐naphthol there are no O—H...O hydrogen bonds or π–π stacking interactions, and sheets are formed by O—H...π and C—H...π interactions.     

3,5‐Bis{3‐[4‐(dimethylamino)phenyl]prop‐2‐enylidene}‐1‐methyl‐4‐piperidone and 3,5‐bis[3‐(4‐methoxyphenyl)prop‐2‐enylidene]‐1‐methyl‐4‐piperidone: potential biophotonic materials

The structures of the title compounds, C₂₈H₃₃N₃O, (I), and C₂₆H₂₇NO₃, (II), together with their two‐photon absorption properties and fluorescence activities are reported. Molecules of (II) reside on crystallographic mirror planes containing the piperidone C=O group and N‐methyl H atoms. Because of the conjugation between the donor and acceptor parts, the central heterocycle in both (I) and (II) exhibits a flattened boat conformation, with deviations of the N atom and the opposite C atom from the planar fragment. The dihedral angles between the coplanar heterocyclic atoms and terminal C₆ rings are less than 20° in both (I) and (II). In (I), the N‐methyl group of the ring occupies an equatorial position, but in (II) it is positioned in an axial site. In the crystal structure of (I), weak intermolecular C—H...π(arene) and C—H...O steric contacts link the molecules along the a axis. In the crystal structure of (II), molecules form stacks along the b axis.     

2‐(4‐Bromophenyl)‐1,2‐dihydropyrimido[1,2‐a]benzimidazol‐4(3H)‐one and 4‐(4‐methylphenyl)‐3,4‐dihydropyrimido[1,2‐a]benzimidazol‐2(1H)‐one form hydrogen‐bonded base‐paired dimers

The title compounds, 2‐(4‐bromo­phenyl)‐1,2‐di­hydro­pyrimido­[1,2‐a]­benzimidazol‐4‐(3H)‐one, C₁₆H₁₂Br­N₃O, (IVa), and 4‐(4‐methylphenyl)‐3,4‐dihydropyrimido[1,2‐a]benzimidazol‐2‐(1H)‐one, C₁₇H₁₅N₃O, (Vb), both form R(8) centrosymmetric dimers via N—H?N hydrogen bonds. The N?N distance is 2.943 (3) Å for (IVa) and 2.8481 (16) Å for (Vb), with the corresponding N—H?N angles being 129 and 167°, respectively. However, in other respects, the supra­molecular structures of the two compounds differ. Both compounds contain different C—H?π interactions, in which the C—H?π(centroid) distances are 2.59 and 2.47 Å for (IVa) and (Vb), respectively (the latter being a short distance), with C—H?π(centroid) angles of 158 and 159°, respectively. The supramolecular structures also differ, with a short Br?O distance of 3.117 (2) Å in bromo derivative (IVa), and a C—H?O interaction with a C?O distance of 3.2561 (19) Å and a C—H?O angle of 127° in tolyl system (Vb). The di­hydro­pyrimido part of (Vb) is disordered, with a ratio of the major and minor components of 0.9:0.1. The disorder consists of two non‐interchangeable envelope conformers, each with an equatorial tolyl group and an axial methine H atom.     

Conformational studies of hydantoin‐5‐acetic acid and orotic acid

Hydantoin‐5‐acetic acid [2‐(2,5‐dioxoimidazolidin‐4‐yl)acetic acid] and orotic acid (2,6‐dioxo‐1,2,3,6‐tetrahydropyrimidine‐4‐carboxylic acid) each contain one rigid acceptor–donor–acceptor hydrogen‐bonding site and a flexible side chain, which can adopt different conformations. Since both compounds may be used as coformers for supramolecular complexes, they have been crystallized in order to examine their conformational preferences, giving solvent‐free hydantoin‐5‐acetic acid, C₅H₆N₂O₄, (I), and three crystals containing orotic acid, namely, orotic acid dimethyl sulfoxide monosolvate, C₅H₄N₂O₄·C₂H₆OS, (IIa), dimethylammonium orotate–orotic acid (1/1), C₂H₈N⁺·C₅H₃N₂O₄⁻·C₅H₄N₂O₄, (IIb), and dimethylammonium orotate–orotic acid (3/1), 3C₂H₈N⁺·3C₅H₃N₂O₄⁻·C₅H₄N₂O₄, (IIc). The crystal structure of (I) shows a three‐dimensional network, with the acid function located perpendicular to the ring. Interestingly, the hydroxy O atom acts as an acceptor, even though the carbonyl O atom is not involved in any hydrogen bonds. However, in (IIa), (IIb) and (IIc), the acid functions are only slightly twisted out of the ring planes. All H atoms of the acidic functions are directed away from the rings and, with respect to the carbonyl O atoms, they show an antiperiplanar conformation in (I) and synperiplanar conformations in (IIa), (IIb) and (IIc). Furthermore, in (IIa), (IIb) and (IIc), different conformations of the acid O=C—C—N torsion angle are observed, leading to different hydrogen‐bonding arrangements depending on their conformation and composition.     

Synthesis and Crystal Structure of Di-n-butyltin（Ⅳ） Complex with 2-Oxo-propionic Acid （4-Pyridinecarbonyl） Hydrazone

The novel complex di‐n‐butyltin(IV) 2‐oxo‐propionic acid (4‐pyridinecarbonyl) hydrazone, (n‐C₄H₉)₂Sn‐[O₂CC(CH₃)=N‐N=C(‐O)C₅N‐4] (H₂O) has been synthesized and its structure has been determined by X‐ray diffraction analysis. The complex crystallizes in orthorhombic system with space group Pca2₁. Crystal data: a=2.7540(9) nm, b=0.9676(3) nm, c= 1.5750(5) nm, V=4.197(2) nm³, D_c= 1.444 g/cm³, Z=8. μ= 1.241 mm^?1. F(000)= 1856, R₁=0.0462 and wR₂=0.1001. In the crystals of the title complex, the tin atom is in six‐coordination with a distorted octahedral geometry, three oxygen atoms [O(1), O(3) and O(4)] and one nitrogen atom N(1) forming the equatorial plane and C(10)‐Sn(1)‐C(14) being the axis. Two molecules form a dimer with weak interactions of Sn‐O bonding and hydrogen bonds.     

Two polymorphs of 2‐(4‐chlorophenyl)‐4‐methylchromenium perchlorate

Crystallization (from ethyl acetate solution) of 2‐(4‐chlorophenyl)‐4‐methylchromenium perchlorate, C₁₆H₁₂ClO⁺·;ClO₄⁻, (I), yields two monoclinic polymorphs with the space groups P2₁/n [polymorph (Ia)] and P2₁/c [polymorph (Ib)]; in both cases, Z = 4. Cations and anions, disordered in polymorph (Ib), form ion pairs in both polymorphs as a result of Cl—O...π interactions. Related by a centre of symmetry, neighbouring ion pairs in polymorph (Ia) are linked viaπ–π interactions between cationic fragments, and the resulting dimers are linked through a network of C—H...O(perchlorate) interactions between adjacent cations and anions. The ion pairs in polymorph (Ib), arranged in pairs of columns along the a axis, are linked through a network of C—H...O(perchlorate), C—Cl...π, π–π and C—Cl...O(perchlorate) interactions. The aromatic skeletons in polymorph (Ia) are parallel in the cationic fragments involved in dimers, but nonparallel in adjacent ion pairs not constituting dimers. In polymorph (Ib), these skeletons are parallel in pairs of columns, but nonparallel in adjacent pairs of columns; this is visible as a herring‐bone pattern. Differences in the crystal structures of the polymorphs are most probably the cause of their different colours.     

5‐Amino‐1‐naphthol: two‐dimensional sheets built up from R44(18) rings formed by O—H...N,N—H...O and π–π interactions

The crystal structure of the title compound, C₁₀H₉NO, (I), contains intermolecular O—H...N and N—H...O hydrogen bonds which together form sheets parallel to the (001) plane containing rings with an unusual R₄⁴(18) motif. These rings are additionally stabilized by an intermolecular π–π stacking interaction. The significance of this study lies in the comparison drawn between the molecular structure of (I) and those of related compounds (1,5‐diaminonaphthalene, 8‐amino‐2‐naphthol, 3‐amino‐2‐naphthol and aniline), which shows a close similarity in the noncoplanar orientation of the amine group and the aromatic moiety. Comparison of the crystal structures of (I) and several of its simple analogues (1‐naphthol, naphthalene‐1,4‐diol, naphthalene‐1,5‐diol and 4‐chloro‐1‐naphthol) shows a close similarity in the packing of the molecules, which form π‐stacks along the shortest crystallographic axes with a substantial spatial overlap between adjacent molecules.     

13C-NMR study on the tautomerism of 3-(arylhydrazono)methyl-2-oxo-1,2-dihydroquinoxalines between the hydrazone imine and diazenylenamine forms

The ¹³C-nmr study was carried out for the tautomerism of the 3-(arylhydrazono)methyl-2-oxo-1,2-dihy-droquinoxalines 1a-g and 2a-e between the hydrazone imine A and diazenylenamine B forms, providing the carbon chemical shifts for the tautomers A and B of compounds 1a-g and 2a-e. The comparison of the carbon chemical shifts for the tautomer B of compounds 1d, 1f , and 2b in deuteriodimethyl sulfoxide with those in deuteriotrifluoroacetic acid showed that the C_4a, C₅, and diazenyl carbons were considerably shielded presumably due to the azo N-deuteration in deuteriotrifluoroacetic acid.     

Three anilides of 2,2′‐thiodibenzoic acid

The structures of N,N′‐bis(2‐methylphenyl)‐2,2′‐thiodibenzamide, C₂₈H₂₄N₂O₂S, (Ia), N,N′‐bis(2‐ethylphenyl)‐2,2′‐thiodibenzamide, C₃₀H₂₈N₂O₂S, (Ib), and N,N′‐bis(2‐bromophenyl)‐2,2′‐thiodibenzamide, C₂₆H₁₈Br₂N₂O₂S, (Ic), are compared with each other. For the 19 atoms of the consistent thiodibenzamide core, the r.m.s. deviations of the molecules in pairs are 0.29, 0.90 and 0.80 Å for (Ia)/(Ib), (Ia)/(Ic) and (Ib)/(Ic), respectively. The conformations of the central parts of molecules (Ia) and (Ib) are similar due to an intramolecular N—H...O hydrogen‐bonding interaction. The molecules of (Ia) are further linked into infinite chains along the c axis by intermolecular N—H...O interactions, whereas the molecules of (Ib) are linked into chains along b by an intermolecular N—H...π contact. The conformation of (Ic) is quite different from those of (Ia) and (Ib), since there is no intramolecular N—H...O hydrogen bond, but instead there is a possible intramolecular N—H...Br hydrogen bond. The molecules are linked into chains along c by intermolecular N—H...O hydrogen bonds.     

Structural effects on the solid‐state photodimerization of 2‐pyridone derivatives in inclusion compounds

The structures of six crystalline inclusion compounds between various host molecules and three guest molecules based on the 2‐pyridone skeleton are described. The six compounds are 1,1′‐biphenyl‐2,2′‐dicarboxylic acid–2‐pyridone (1/2), C₁₄H₁₀O₄·2C₅H₅NO, (I–a), 1,1′‐biphenyl‐2,2′‐dicarboxylic acid–4‐methyl‐2‐pyridone (1/2), C₁₄H₁₀O₄·2C₆H₇NO, (I–c), 1,1′‐biphenyl‐2,2′‐dicarboxylic acid–6‐methyl‐2‐pyridone (1/2), C₁₄H₁₀O₄·2C₆H₇NO, (I–d), 1,1,6,6‐tetraphenyl‐2,4‐hexadiyne‐1,6‐diol–1‐methyl‐2‐pyridone (1/2), C₃₀H₂₂O₂·2C₆H₇NO, (II–b), 1,1,6,6‐tetraphenyl‐2,4‐hexadiyne‐1,6‐diol–4‐methy‐2‐pyridone (1/2), C₃₀H₂₂O₂·2C₆H₇NO, (II–c), and 4,4′,4′′‐(ethane‐1,1,1‐triyl)triphenol–6‐methyl‐2‐pyridone–water (1/3/1), C₂₀H₁₈O₃·3C₆H₇NO·H₂O, (III–d). In two of the compounds, (I–a) and (I–d), the host molecules lie about crystallographic twofold axes. In two other compounds, (II–b) and (II–c), the host molecules lie across inversion centers. In all cases, the guest molecules are hydrogen bonded to the host molecules through O—H...O=C hydrogen bonds [the range of O...O distances is 2.543 (2)–2.843 (2) Å. The pyridone moieties form dimers through N—H...O=C hydrogen bonds in five of the compounds [the range of N...O distances is 2.763 (2)–2.968 (2) Å]. In four compounds, (I–a), (I–c), (I–d) and (II–c), the molecules are arranged in extended zigzag chains formed via host–guest hydrogen bonding. In five of the compounds, the guest molecules are arranged in parallel pairs on top of each other, related by inversion centers. However, none of these compounds underwent photodimerization in the solid state upon irradiation. In one of the crystalline compounds, (III–d), the guest molecules are arranged in stacks with one disordered molecule. The unsuccessful dimerization is attributed to the large interatomic distances between the potentially reactive atoms [the range of distances is 4.027 (4)–4.865 (4) Å] and to the bad overlap, expressed by the lateral shift between the orbitals of these atoms [the range of the shifts from perfect overlap is 1.727 (4)–3.324 (4) Å]. The bad overlap and large distances between potentially photoreactive atoms are attributed to the hydrogen‐bonding schemes, because the interactions involved in hydrogen bonding are stronger than those in π–π interactions.     

2‐Ammonio‐5‐chloro‐4‐methylbenzenesulfonate,its 1‐methyl‐2‐pyrrolidone and dimethyl sulfoxide monosolvates and a corrected structure of 2,2′‐(1,4‐phenylene)di(4,5‐dihydroimidazolium) bis(4‐aminobenzenesulfonate) dihydrate

2‐Ammonio‐5‐chloro‐4‐methylbenzenesulfonate, C₇H₈ClNO₃S, (Ia), is an intermediate in the synthesis of lake red azo pigments. The present structure determination from single‐crystal data confirms the results of a previous powder diffraction determination [Bekö, Thoms, Brüning, Alig, van de Streek, Lakatos, Glaubitz & Schmidt (2010). Z. Kristallogr. 225 , 382–387]. The zwitterionic tautomeric form is confirmed. During a polymorph screening, two additional pseudopolymorphs were obtained, viz. 2‐ammonio‐5‐chloro‐4‐methylbenzenesulfonate 1‐methyl‐2‐pyrrolidone monosolvate, C₇H₈ClNO₃S·C₅H₉NO, (Ib), and 2‐ammonio‐5‐chloro‐4‐methylbenzenesulfonate dimethyl sulfoxide monosolvate, C₇H₈ClNO₃S·C₂H₆OS, (Ic). The molecules of (Ib) have crystallographic m symmetry. The 1‐methyl‐2‐pyrrolidone solvent molecule has an envelope conformation and is disordered around the mirror plane. The structure shows hydrogen‐bonded ladders of molecules [graph‐set notation C₂²(6)R₂²(12)] in the [010] direction. The benzene groups of adjacent ladders are also stacked in this direction. A different type of hydrogen‐bonded ladder [graph‐set notation C(6)R₂²(4)R₄⁴(12)] occurs in (Ic). In (Ia), (Ib) and (Ic), the molecules correspond to the zwitterionic tautomer. The structure of the cocrystal of 4‐aminobenzenesulfonic acid with 1,4‐bis(4,5‐dihydroimidazol‐2‐yl)benzene [Shang, Ren, Wang, Lu & Yang (2009). Acta Cryst. E 65 , o2221–o2222] is corrected; it actually contains 4‐aminobenzenesulfonate anions and 2,2′‐(1,4‐phenylene)di(dihydroimidazolium) dications, i.e. 2,2′‐(1,4‐phenylene)di(4,5‐dihydroimidazolium) bis(4‐aminobenzenesulfonate) dihydrate, C₁₂H₁₆N₄²⁺·2C₆H₆NO₃S⁻·2H₂O. Hence, all known structures of aminobenzenesulfonic acid complexes contain ionic or zwitterionic molecules; there is no known structure with a neutral aminobenzenesulfonic acid molecule.     

An X‐ray crystallographic and density functional theory study of (3Z)‐4‐(5‐ethylsulfonyl‐2‐hydroxyanilino)pent‐3‐en‐2‐one and (3Z)‐4‐(5‐tert‐butyl‐2‐hydroxyanilino)pent‐3‐en‐2‐one

The Schiff base enaminones (3Z)‐4‐(5‐ethylsulfonyl‐2‐hydroxyanilino)pent‐3‐en‐2‐one, C₁₃H₁₇NO₄S, (I), and (3Z)‐4‐(5‐tert‐butyl‐2‐hydroxyanilino)pent‐3‐en‐2‐one, C₁₅H₂₁NO₂, (II), were studied by X‐ray crystallography and density functional theory (DFT). Although the keto tautomer of these compounds is dominant, the O=C—C=C—N bond lengths are consistent with some electron delocalization and partial enol character. Both (I) and (II) are nonplanar, with the amino–phenol group canted relative to the rest of the molecule; the twist about the N(enamine)—C(aryl) bond leads to dihedral angles of 40.5 (2) and −116.7 (1)° for (I) and (II), respectively. Compound (I) has a bifurcated intramolecular hydrogen bond between the N—H group and the flanking carbonyl and hydroxy O atoms, as well as an intermolecular hydrogen bond, leading to an infinite one‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded chain. Compound (II) has one intramolecular hydrogen bond and one intermolecular C=O...H—O hydrogen bond, and consequently also forms a one‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded chain. The DFT‐calculated structures [in vacuo, B3LYP/6‐311G(d,p) level] for the keto tautomers compare favourably with the X‐ray crystal structures of (I) and (II), confirming the dominance of the keto tautomer. The simulations indicate that the keto tautomers are 20.55 and 18.86 kJ mol⁻¹ lower in energy than the enol tautomers for (I) and (II), respectively.     

Pseudopolymorphs of 2,6‐diaminopyrimidin‐4‐one and 2‐amino‐6‐methylpyrimidin‐4‐one: one or two tautomers present in the same crystal

The derivatives of pyrimidin‐4‐one can adopt either a 1H‐ or a 3H‐tautomeric form, which affects the hydrogen‐bonding interactions in cocrystals with compounds containing complementary functional groups. In order to study their tautomeric preferences, we crystallized 2,6‐diaminopyrimidin‐4‐one and 2‐amino‐6‐methylpyrimidin‐4‐one. During various crystallization attempts, four structures of 2,6‐diaminopyrimidin‐4‐one were obtained, namely solvent‐free 2,6‐diaminopyrimidin‐4‐one, C₄H₆N₄O, (I), 2,6‐diaminopyrimidin‐4‐one–dimethylformamide–water (3/4/1), C₄H₆N₄O·1.33C₃H₇NO·0.33H₂O, (Ia), 2,6‐diaminopyrimidin‐4‐one dimethylacetamide monosolvate, C₄H₆N₄O·C₄H₉NO, (Ib), and 2,6‐diaminopyrimidin‐4‐one–N‐methylpyrrolidin‐2‐one (3/2), C₄H₆N₄O·1.5C₅H₉NO, (Ic). The 2,6‐diaminopyrimidin‐4‐one molecules exist only as 3H‐tautomers. They form ribbons characterized by R²₂(8) hydrogen‐bonding interactions, which are further connected to form three‐dimensional networks. An intermolecular N—H...N interaction between amine groups is observed only in (I). This might be the reason for the pyramidalization of the amine group. Crystallization experiments on 2‐amino‐6‐methylpyrimidin‐4‐one yielded two isostructural pseudopolymorphs, namely 2‐amino‐6‐methylpyrimidin‐4(3H)‐one–2‐amino‐6‐methylpyrimidin‐4(1H)‐one–dimethylacetamide (1/1/1), C₅H₇N₃O·C₅H₇N₃O·C₄H₉NO, (IIa), and 2‐amino‐6‐methylpyrimidin‐4(3H)‐one–2‐amino‐6‐methylpyrimidin‐4(1H)‐one–N‐methylpyrrolidin‐2‐one (1/1/1), C₅H₇N₃O·C₅H₇N₃O·C₅H₉NO, (IIb). In both structures, a 1:1 mixture of 1H‐ and 3H‐tautomers is present, which are linked by three hydrogen bonds similar to a Watson–Crick C–G base pair.     

Conversion of 1,3‐Dimethyl‐5‐(Arylazo)‐6‐Amino‐Uracils to 1,3‐Dimethyl‐5‐(Arylazo)‐Barbituric Acids: Spectroscopic Characterization,Photophysical Property and Determination of pKa of the Products

The study of inter‐conversion between molecules, especially biologically and pharmaceutically important molecules, is extremely important. This study reports the inter‐conversion between two azo‐derivtives: azo‐6‐aminouracils to azo‐barbituric acids. We successfully converted the 1,3‐dimethyl‐5‐(arylazo)‐6‐aminouracils ( Uazo‐1 to Uazo‐4 ) to 1,3‐dimethyl‐5‐(arylazo)‐barbituric acids ( BAazo‐1 to BAazo‐4 ) (where aryl?C₆H₅‐( 1 ); p‐MeC₆H₄‐( 2 ), p‐ClC₆H₄‐( 3 ), and p‐NO₂C₆H₄‐( 4 )) following an acid‐hydrolysis path. The products were characterized using spectroscopic tools like UV‐vis, IR, and NMR spectroscopy. UV‐vis spectra of the as‐prepared dyes reveal that in contrast to the azo‐6‐aminouracils they are hardly responsive towards solvatochromism. IR spectra exhibit three characteristic >C?O frequencies for as‐prepared azobarbituric acids instead of two for mother azo‐6‐aminouracils. ¹H NMR spectra which reflect the existence of solution species evidence the absence of >C?NH group (characteristic imido‐H at the 6‐position of hydrazone species of azo‐6‐aminouracils) and consequence presence of >C?O group at the same position in as‐prepared azobarbituric acids. They exhibit structural emissions in the range of 400–440 nm upon excitation at 360 nm. The determined acid dissociation constant (pKa) values of BAazos increase according to the following sequence: BAazo ‐ 2 > 1 > 3 > 4 .     

Proton transfer versus nontransfer in compounds of the diazo‐dye precursor 4‐(phenyldiazenyl)aniline (aniline yellow) with strong organic acids: the 5‐sulfosalicylate and the dichroic benzenesulfonate salts,and the 1:2 adduct with 3,5‐dinitrobenzoic acid

The structures of two 1:1 proton‐transfer red–black dye compounds formed by reaction of aniline yellow [4‐(phenyldiazenyl)aniline] with 5‐sulfosalicylic acid and benzenesulfonic acid, and a 1:2 nontransfer adduct compound with 3,5‐dinitrobenzoic acid have been determined at either 130 or 200 K. The compounds are 2‐(4‐aminophenyl)‐1‐phenylhydrazin‐1‐ium 3‐carboxy‐4‐hydroxybenzenesulfonate methanol solvate, C₁₂H₁₂N₃⁺·C₇H₅O₆S⁻·CH₃OH, (I), 2‐(4‐aminophenyl)‐1‐phenylhydrazin‐1‐ium 4‐(phenyldiazenyl)anilinium bis(benzenesulfonate), 2C₁₂H₁₂N₃⁺·2C₆H₅O₃S⁻, (II), and 4‐(phenyldiazenyl)aniline–3,5‐dinitrobenzoic acid (1/2), C₁₂H₁₁N₃·2C₇H₄N₂O₆, (III). In compound (I), the diazenyl rather than the aniline group of aniline yellow is protonated, and this group subsequently takes part in a primary hydrogen‐bonding interaction with a sulfonate O‐atom acceptor, producing overall a three‐dimensional framework structure. A feature of the hydrogen bonding in (I) is a peripheral edge‐on cation–anion association also involving aromatic C—H...O hydrogen bonds, giving a conjoint R¹₂(6)R¹₂(7)R²₁(4) motif. In the dichroic crystals of (II), one of the two aniline yellow species in the asymmetric unit is diazenyl‐group protonated, while in the other the aniline group is protonated. Both of these groups form hydrogen bonds with sulfonate O‐atom acceptors and these, together with other associations, give a one‐dimensional chain structure. In compound (III), rather than proton transfer, there is preferential formation of a classic R²₂(8) cyclic head‐to‐head hydrogen‐bonded carboxylic acid homodimer between the two 3,5‐dinitrobenzoic acid molecules, which, in association with the aniline yellow molecule that is disordered across a crystallographic inversion centre, results in an overall two‐dimensional ribbon structure. This work has shown the correlation between structure and observed colour in crystalline aniline yellow compounds, illustrated graphically in the dichroic benzenesulfonate compound.     

1H‐Indazole and 2H‐indazole derivatives of androsta‐5,16‐dien‐3β‐ol

The title compounds, 17‐(1H‐indazol‐1‐yl)androsta‐5,16‐dien‐3β‐ol, (I), and 17‐(2H‐indazol‐2‐yl)androsta‐5,16‐dien‐3β‐ol, (II), both C₂₆H₃₂N₂O, have an indazole substituent at the C17 position. The six‐membered B ring of each compound assumes a half‐chair conformation. A twist of the steroid skeleton is observed and reproduced in quantum‐mechanical ab initio calculations of the isolated molecule using a molecular orbital Hartree–Fock method. In the 1H‐indazole derivative, (I), the molecules are joined in a head‐to‐head fashion via O—H...O hydrogen bonds, forming chains along the a axis. In the 2H‐indazole derivative, (II), the molecules are joined in a head‐to‐tail fashion with one of the N atoms of the indazole ring system acting as the acceptor. The hydrogen‐bond pattern consists of zigzag chains running along the b axis. Substituted steroids have proven to be effective in inhibiting androgen biosynthesis through coordination of the Fe atoms of some enzymes, and this study shows that indazole‐substituted steroids adopt twisted conformations that restrict their intermolecular interactions.     

Two isomorphous benzene­sulfon­amide crystal structures determined by intermolecular C—H⃛O,C—H⃛π and C—H⃛Cl interactions

The title compounds, N‐[5‐(4‐chloro­phenyl)­furan‐2‐yl­methyl]‐4‐methyl‐N‐(prop‐2‐ynyl)­benzene­sulfon­amide, (Ia), and N‐[5‐(2‐chloro­phenyl)­furan‐2‐yl­methyl]‐4‐methyl‐N‐(prop‐2‐ynyl)­benzene­sulfon­amide, (Ib), both C₂₁H₁₈ClNO₃S, have isomorphous crystal structures. The crystal packing is mainly determined by intermolecular C—H?O and C—H?π interactions. These interactions are very similar in (Ia) and (Ib). Additional intermolecular C—H?Cl interactions appear less important and are different in (Ia) and (Ib). The different positions of the Cl atoms result in small variations of the crystal packing of the two compounds.     

Synthesis,structural characterization,density functional theory calculations and biological evaluation of a new organotin(IV) complex containing N‐isonicotinyl‐N',N″‐diaryl phosphorictriamide as N‐donor ligand

A new diorganotin(IV) complex with the formula SnCl₂(CH₃)₂L₂ ( C_1a ), L = 4‐NC₅H₄CONHPO(NCH₃CH₂C₆H₅)₂, was synthesized and characterized using ¹H NMR, ¹³C NMR, ³¹P NMR, ¹¹⁹Sn NMR and infrared spectroscopies. The molecular structure of C_1a was determined using X‐ray crystallography, revealing that C_1a contains hexa‐coordinated Sn(IV) centres with trans‐configuration of donor atoms around them. Each Sn(IV) atom is positioned in the centre of inversion of an octahedron. C_1a forms one‐dimensional chains via two equal intermolecular P?O…H? N hydrogen bonds. These hydrogen bonds produce centrosymmetric rings as a supramolecular hydrogen‐bonded pattern. In order to compare the relative stability of C_1a (with N‐ligated configuration) and its possible O‐ligated isomer, C_1b , density functional theory calculations were performed, the results showing a preference of C_1a over C_1b from an energy point of view. Also, natural bond orbital analysis was carried out to obtain detailed information on the electronic features of the optimized structures. The theoretical results show that intermolecular hydrogen bonding in the crystal structure has a significant role in the stabilization of C_1a , and Sn(IV) interacts more strongly with the N_py atom than the P?O functional group. Furthermore, the free ligand and its complex were tested against three human cancer cell lines, i.e. human cervical carcinoma (HeLa), human prostate cancer (PC‐3) and human breast adenocarcinoma cancer (MCF‐7). C_1a displays moderate to good cytotoxicity towards all three cancer cell lines. Moreover, antibacterial tests were carried out using the disc‐diffusion method, in which C_1a shows high activity against selected Gram‐negative and Gram‐positive bacteria. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.