Two seven‐membered heterocycles with 1,2‐diaza ring N atoms: 3,5,7‐triphenyl‐1,2‐diazacyclohepta‐1(7),2‐diene and 3,7‐bis(2‐hydroxyphenyl)‐5‐phenyl‐1,2‐diazacyclohepta‐1(7),2‐diene

The title compounds, 3,5,7‐triphenyl‐1,2‐diazacyclohepta‐1(7),2‐diene, C₂₃H₂₀N₂, (I), and 3,7‐bis(2‐hydroxyphenyl)‐5‐phenyl‐1,2‐diazacyclohepta‐1(7),2‐diene, C₂₃H₂₀N₂O₂, (II), constitute the first structurally characterized examples of seven‐membered heterocycles with 1,2‐diaza ring N atoms. Compound (I) crystallizes in the space group P, with two independent molecules in the asymmetric unit that differ in the conformation of one of the phenyl rings, while (II) crystallizes in the space group C2/c. The C₅N₂ ring in each of (I) and (II) adopts a twist‐boat conformation. Compound (I) exhibits neither C—H...π interactions nor π–π stacking interactions, whereas (II) shows both intramolecular O—H...N hydrogen bonds and a C—H...π interaction that joins the molecules into an infinite chain in the [010] direction.     

C—H...π interactions in cocrystals of bis(trimethylsilyl)acetylene and diphenylacetylene with benzene

We present here the crystal structures of two acetylene derivatives cocrystallized with benzene, namely bis(trimethylsilyl)acetylene benzene solvate, C₈H₁₈Si₂·C₆H₆, (I), and diphenylacetylene benzene solvate, C₁₄H₁₀·C₆H₆, (II). In (I), both molecules belong to the symmetry point group C_2h and are located about special positions with site symmetry 2/m. In (II), both molecules show crystallographic inversion symmetry. In both structures, there are C—H...π contacts between aromatic H atoms and the π‐electrons of the triple bond. In addition to these, in (II) there are C—H...π contacts between aromatic H atoms and the π‐electron cloud of the benzene molecules.     

Conformational polymorphism of (E,E)‐N,N′‐bis(4‐nitrobenzylidene)benzene‐1,4‐diamine

Two polymorphs of (E,E)‐N,N′‐bis(4‐nitrobenzylidene)benzene‐1,4‐diamine, C₂₀H₁₄N₄O₄, (I), have been identified. In each case, the molecule lies across a crystallographic inversion centre. The supramolecular structure of the first polymorph, (I‐1), features stacking based on π–π interactions assisted by weak hydrogen bonds involving the nitro groups. The second polymorph, (I‐2), displays a perpendicular arrangement of molecules linked via the nitro groups, combined with weak C—H...O hydrogen bonds. Both crystal structures are compared with that of the carbon analogue (E,E)‐1,4‐bis[2‐(4‐nitrophenyl)ethenyl]benzene, (II).     

Intermolecular π‐stacking and F...F interactions of fluorine‐substituted meso‐alkynylporphyrin

Two C2‐symmetric meso‐alkynylporphyrins, namely 5,15‐bis[(4‐butyl‐2,3,5,6‐tetrafluorophenyl)ethynyl]‐10,20‐dipropylporphyrin, C₅₀H₄₂F₈N₄, (I), and 5,15‐bis[(4‐butylphenyl)ethynyl]‐10,20‐dipropylporphyrin, C₅₀H₅₀N₄, (II), show remarkable π–π stacking that forms columns of porphyrin centers. The tetrafluorophenylene moieties in (I) show intermolecular interactions with each other through the F atoms, forming one‐dimensional ribbons. No significant π–π interactions are observed in the plane of the phenylene and tetrafluorophenylene moieties in either (I) or (II). The molecules of both compounds lie about inversion centers.     

Hydrogen‐bonded structures of the isomeric 2‐, 3‐ and 4‐carbamoylpyridinium hydrogen chloranilates

In the three isomeric salts, all C₆H₇N₂O⁺·C₆HCl₂O₄⁻, of chloranilic acid (2,5‐dichloro‐3,6‐dihydroxy‐1,4‐benzoquinone) with 2‐, 3‐ and 4‐carbamoylpyridine, namely, 2‐carbamoylpyridinium hydrogen chloranilate (systematic name: 2‐carbamoylpyridinium 2,5‐dichloro‐4‐hydroxy‐3,6‐dioxocyclohexa‐1,4‐dienolate), (I), 3‐carbamoylpyridinium hydrogen chloranilate, (II), and 4‐carbamoylpyridinium hydrogen chloranilate, (III), acid–base interactions involving H‐atom transfer are observed. The shortest interactions between the cation and the anion in (I) and (II) are pyridinium N—H...(O,O) bifurcated hydrogen bonds, which act as the primary intermolecular interaction in each crystal structure. In (III), an amide N—H...(O,O) bifurcated hydrogen bond, which is much weaker than the bifurcated hydrogen bonds in (I) and (II), connects the cation and the anion.     

Three methoxy‐substituted diethyl 4‐­phenyl‐2,6‐di­methyl‐1,4‐di­hydro­pyridine‐3,5‐di­carboxyl­ate compounds

Diethyl 4‐(2,5‐di­methoxy­phenyl)‐2,6‐di­methyl‐1,4‐di­hydro­pyridine‐3,5‐di­carboxyl­ate, C₂₁H₂₇NO₆, (I), diethyl 4‐(3,4‐di­methoxy­phenyl)‐2,6‐di­methyl‐1,4‐di­hydro­pyridine‐3,5‐di­carboxyl­ate, C₂₁H₂₇NO₆, (II), and diethyl 2,6‐di­methyl‐4‐(3,4,5‐tri­methoxy­phenyl)‐1,4‐di­hydro­pyridine‐3,5‐di­carboxyl­ate, C₂₂H₂₉NO₇, (III), crystallize with hydrogen‐bonding networks involving the H atom bonded to the N atom of the 1,4‐di­hydro­pyridine ring and carbonyl O atoms in (I) and (II). Unusually, (III) shows O atoms of methoxy groups serving as hydrogen‐bond acceptors.     

Hydrogen‐bonded one‐dimensional networks in 1:1 complexes of N,N′‐bis(2‐pyridyl)aryldiamines with anilic acid

The 1:1 complexes N,N′‐bis(2‐pyridyl)­benzene‐1,4‐di­amine–anilic acid (2,5‐di­hydroxy‐1,4‐benzo­quinone) (1/1), C₁₆H₁₄N₄·C₆H₄O₄, (I), and N,N′‐bis(2‐pyridyl)­bi­phenyl‐4,4′‐di­amine–anilic acid (1/1), C₂₂H₁₈N₄·C₆H₄O₄, (II), have been prepared and their solid‐state structures investigated. The component mol­ecules of these complexes are connected via conventional N—H?O and O—H?N hydrogen bonds, leading to the formation of an infinite one‐dimensional network generated by the cyclic motif R(9). The anilic acid molecules in both crystal structures lie around inversion centres and the observed bond lengths are typical for the neutral mol­ecule. Nevertheless, the pyridine C—N—C angles [120.9 (2) and 120.13 (17)° for complexes (I) and (II), respectively] point to a partial H‐atom transfer from anilic aicd to the bispyridyl­amine, and hence to H‐atom disorder in the OHN bridge. The bispyridyl­amine mol­ecules of (I) and (II) also lie around inversion centres and exhibit disorder of their central phenyl rings over two positions.     

2‐Ethyl‐6‐methylpyridin‐3‐ol and its salt bis(2‐ethyl‐3‐hydroxy‐6‐methylpyridinium) succinate

The title compounds, C₈H₁₁NO, (I), and 2C₈H₁₂NO⁺·C₄H₄O₄²⁻, (II), both crystallize in the monoclinic space group P2₁/c. In the crystal structure of (I), intermolecular O—H...N hydrogen bonds combine the molecules into polymeric chains extending along the c axis. The chains are linked by C—H...π interactions between the methylene H atoms and the pyridine rings into polymeric layers parallel to the ac plane. In the crystal structure of (II), the succinate anion lies on an inversion centre. Its carboxylate groups interact with the 2‐ethyl‐3‐hydroxy‐6‐methylpyridinium cations via intermolecular N—H...O hydrogen bonds with the pyridine ring H atoms and O—H...O hydrogen bonds with the hydroxy H atoms to form polymeric chains, which extend along the [01] direction and comprise R₄⁴(18) hydrogen‐bonded ring motifs. These chains are linked to form a three‐dimensional network through nonclassical C—H...O hydrogen bonds between the pyridine ring H atoms and the hydroxy‐group O atoms of neighbouring cations. π–π interactions between the pyridine rings and C—H...π interactions between the methylene H atoms of the succinate anion and the pyridine rings are also present in this network.     

Comparison of conventional and synchrotron X‐ray structure deter­minations of the adduct 1,2,4,5‐tetrahydroxybenzene–2,5‐dihydroxy‐1,4‐benzoquinone (1/1) and a conventional X‐ray structure determination of 1,2,4,5‐tetrahydroxybenzene monohydrate

The X‐ray structure of 1,2,4,5‐tetra­hydroxy­benzene (benzene‐1,2,4,5‐tetrol) monohydrate, C₆H₆O₄·H₂O, (I), reveals columns of 1,2,4,5‐tetra­hydroxy­benzene parallel to the b axis that are separated by 3.364 (12) and 3.453 (11) Å. Molecules in adjacent columns are tilted relative to each other by 27.78 (8)°. Water mol­ecules fill the channels between the columns and are involved in hydrogen‐bonding interactions with the 1,2,4,5‐tetra­hydroxy­benzene mol­ecules. The crystal structure of the adduct 1,2,4,5‐tetra­hydroxy­benzene–2,5‐di­hydroxy‐1,4‐benzo­quinone (1/1), C₆H₆O₄·C₆H₄O₄, (II), reveals alternating mol­ecules of 1,2,4,5‐tetra­hydroxy­benzene and 2,5‐di­hydroxy‐1,4‐benzo­quinone (both lying on inversion centers), and a zigzag hydrogen‐bonded network connecting mol­ecules in three dimensions. For compound (II), the conventional X‐ray determination, (IIa), is in very good agreement with the synchrotron X‐ray determination, (IIb). When differences in data collection temperatures are taken into account, even the displacement parameters are in very good agreement.     

C—H...π interactions in five ethynyl‐substituted [2.2]paracyclophanes: further examples of the `7,11' packing pattern

The monosubstituted derivative 4‐ethynyl[2.2]paracyclophane, C₁₈H₁₆, (I), and the four disubstituted isomers, 4,12‐, (II), 4,13‐, (III), 4,15‐, (IV), and 4,16‐diethynyl[2.2]paracyclophane, (V), all C₂₀H₁₆, show the usual distortions of the [2.2]paracyclophane framework. The crystal packing is analyzed in terms of C—H...π interactions, some with H...π as short as 2.47 Å, in which the cyclophane rings and/or the triple‐bond systems may act as acceptors. For compounds (I) and (IV), the known `7,11'‐type cyclophane packing is observed, with a herring‐bone pattern of molecules in a layer structure.     

2,5‐Bis[4‐methyl‐3‐(pyridin‐3‐yl)phenyl]‐1,3,4‐oxadiazole and its one‐dimensional polymeric complex with ZnCl2

2,5‐Bis[4‐methyl‐3‐(pyridin‐3‐yl)phenyl]‐1,3,4‐oxadiazole (L), C₂₆H₂₀N₄O, forms one‐dimensional chains via two types of intermolecular π–π interactions. In catena‐poly[[dichloridozinc(II)]‐μ‐2,5‐bis[4‐methyl‐3‐(pyridin‐3‐yl)phenyl]‐1,3,4‐oxadiazole], [ZnCl₂(C₂₆H₂₀N₄O)]_n, synthesized by the combination of L with ZnCl₂, the Zn^II centres are coordinated by two Cl atoms and two N atoms from two L ligands. [ZnCl₂L]_n forms one‐dimensional P (plus) and M (minus) helical chains, where the L ligand has different directions of twist. The helical chains stack together via interchain π–π and C—H...π interactions.     

4‐Ethynyl‐4‐hydroxycyclohexan‐1‐one and 4‐ethynyl‐4‐hydroxy‐2,3,5,6‐tetramethylcyclohexa‐2,5‐dien‐1‐one

The title compounds, C₈H₁₀O₂, (I), and C₁₂H₁₄O₂, (II), occurred as by‐products in the controlled synthesis of a series of bis­(gem‐alkynols), prepared as part of an extensive study of synthon formation in simple gem‐alkynol derivatives. The two 4‐(gem‐alkynol)‐1‐ones crystallize in space group P2₁/c, (I) with Z′ = 1 and (II) with Z′ = 2. Both structures are dominated by O—H?O=C hydrogen bonds, which form simple chains in the cyclo­hexane derivative, (I), and centrosymmetric dimers, of both symmetry‐independent mol­ecules, in the cyclo­hexa‐2,5‐diene, (II). These strong synthons are further stabilized by C[triple‐bond]C—H?O=C, C_methylene—H?O(H) and C_methyl—H?O(H) interactions. The direct intermolecular interactions between donors and acceptors in the gem‐alkynol group, which characterize the bis­(gem‐alkynol) analogues of (I) and (II), are not present in the ketone derivatives studied here.     

Cocrystals of 1,4‐diethynylbenzene with 1,3‐diacetylbenzene and benzene‐1,4‐dicarbaldehyde exhibiting strong nonconventional alkyne–carbonyl C—H…O hydrogen bonds between the components

Weak interactions between organic molecules are important in solid‐state structures where the sum of the weaker interactions support the overall three‐dimensional crystal structure. The sp‐C—H…N hydrogen‐bonding interaction is strong enough to promote the deliberate cocrystallization of a series of diynes with a series of dipyridines. It is also possible that a similar series of cocrystals could be formed between molecules containing a terminal alkyne and molecules which contain carbonyl O atoms as the potential hydrogen‐bond acceptor. I now report the crystal structure of two cocrystals that support this hypothesis. The 1:1 cocrystal of 1,4‐diethynylbenzene with 1,3‐diacetylbenzene, C₁₀H₆·C₁₀H₁₀O₂, (1), and the 1:1 cocrystal of 1,4‐diethynylbenzene with benzene‐1,4‐dicarbaldehyde, C₁₀H₆·C₈H₆O₂, (2), are presented. In both cocrystals, a strong nonconventional ethynyl–carbonyl sp‐C—H…O hydrogen bond is observed between the components. In cocrystal (1), the C—H…O hydrogen‐bond angle is 171.8 (16)° and the H…O and C…O hydrogen‐bond distances are 2.200 (19) and 3.139 (2) Å, respectively. In cocrystal (2), the C—H…O hydrogen‐bond angle is 172.5 (16)° and the H…O and C…O hydrogen‐bond distances are 2.25 (2) and 3.203 (2) Å, respectively.     

Two‐dimensional ZnII and one‐dimensional CoII coordination polymers based on benzene‐1,4‐dicarboxylate and pyridine ligands

Coordination polymers constructed from metal ions and organic ligands have attracted considerable attention owing to their diverse structural topologies and potential applications. Ligands containing carboxylate groups are among the most extensively studied because of their versatile coordination modes. Reactions of benzene‐1,4‐dicarboxylic acid (H₂BDC) and pyridine (py) with Zn^II or Co^II yielded two new coordination polymers, namely, poly[(μ₄‐benzene‐1,4‐dicarboxylato‐κ⁴O:O′:O′′:O′′′)(pyridine‐κN)zinc(II)], [Zn(C₈H₄O₂)(C₅H₅N)]_n, (I), and catena‐poly[aqua(μ₃‐benzene‐1,4‐dicarboxylato‐κ³O:O′:O′′)bis(pyridine‐κN)cobalt(II)], [Co(C₈H₄O₂)(C₅H₅N)₂(H₂O)]_n, (II). In compound (I), the Zn^II cation is five‐coordinated by four carboxylate O atoms from four BDC²⁻ ligands and one pyridine N atom in a distorted square‐pyramidal coordination geometry. Four carboxylate groups bridge two Zn^II ions to form centrosymmetric paddle‐wheel‐like Zn₂(μ₂‐COO)₄ units, which are linked by the benzene rings of the BDC²⁻ ligands to generate a two‐dimensional layered structure. The two‐dimensional layer is extended into a three‐dimensional supramolecular structure with the help of π–π stacking interactions between the aromatic rings. Compound (II) has a one‐dimensional double‐chain structure based on Co₂(μ₂‐COO)₂ units. The Co^II cations are bridged by BDC²⁻ ligands and are octahedrally coordinated by three carboxylate O atoms from three BDC²⁻ ligands, one water O atom and two pyridine N atoms. Interchain O—H…O hydrogen‐bonding interactions link these chains to form a three‐dimensional supramolecular architecture.     

Relative influence of noncovalent interactions on the melting points of a homologous series of 1,2‐dibromo‐4,5‐dialkoxybenzenes

Crystal structures are presented for two members of the homologous series of 1,2‐dibromo‐4,5‐dialkoxybenzenes, viz. those with decyloxy and hexadecyloxy substituents, namely 1,2‐dibromo‐4,5‐bis(decyloxy)benzene, C₂₆H₄₄Br₂O₂, (II), and 1,2‐dibromo‐4,5‐bis(hexadecyloxy)benzene, C₃₈H₆₈Br₂O₂, (III). The relative influences which halogen bonding, π–π stacking and van der Waals interactions have on these structures are analysed and the results compared with those already found for the lightest homologue, 1,2‐dibromo‐4,5‐dimethoxybenzene, (I) [Cukiernik, Zelcer, Garland & Baggio (2008). Acta Cryst. C 64 , o604–o608]. The results confirm that the prevalent interactions stabilizing the structures of (II) and (III) are van der Waals contacts between the aliphatic chains. In the case of (II), weak halogen C—Br...(Br—C)′ interactions are also present and contribute to the stability of the structure. In the case of (III), van der Waals interactions between the aliphatic chains are almost exclusive, weaker C—Br...π interactions being the only additional interactions detected. The results are in line with commonly accepted models concerning trends in crystal stability along a homologous series (as measured by their melting points), but the earlier report for n = 1, and the present report for n = 10 and 16, are among the few providing single‐crystal information validating the hypothesis.     

Poly[(μ3‐benzene‐1,4‐diacetato)[μ2‐1,4‐bis(1,2,4‐triazol‐1‐yl)butane]cadmium(II)]: self assembly into a three‐dimensional supramolecular framework based on [Cd(μ3‐benzene‐1,4‐diacetate)] double chains

The title compound, [Cd(C₁₀H₈O₄)(C₈H₁₂N₆)]_n, crystallizes with an asymmetric unit comprising a divalent Cd^II atom, a benzene‐1,4‐diacetate (PBEA²⁻) ligand and a complete 1,4‐bis(1,2,4‐triazol‐1‐yl)butane (BTB) ligand. [Cd(PBEA)]_n double chains, arranged parallel to the c axis, are formed through an exo‐tridentate binding mode of the PBEA²⁻ ligands. These [Cd(PBEA)]_n double chains are pillared by tethering BTB ligands, in which the BTB shows a trans–trans–trans conformation, to establish [Cd(PBEA)(BTB)]_n two‐dimensional coordination polymer (4,4)‐layer slab patterns. The three‐dimensional supramolecular architecture is formed by C—H...O hydrogen bonds and C—H...π interactions.     

Synthesis,crystal structure and photophysical properties of 1,4‐bis(1,3‐diazaazulen‐2‐yl)benzene: a new π building block

A dimerized 1,3‐diazaazulene derivative, namely 1,4‐bis(1,3‐diazaazulen‐2‐yl)benzene [or 2,2′‐(1,4‐phenylene)bis(1,3‐diazaazulene)], C₂₂H₁₄N₄, (I), has been synthesized successfully through the condensation reaction between 2‐methoxytropone and benzene‐1,4‐dicarboximidamide hydrochloride, and was characterized by ¹H NMR and ¹³C NMR spectroscopies, and ESI–MS. X‐ray diffraction analysis reveals that (I) has a nearly planar structure with good π‐electron delocalization, indicating that it might serve as a π building block. The crystal belongs to the monoclinic system. One‐dimensional chains were formed along the a axis through π–π interactions and adjacent chains are stabilized by C—H…N interactions, forming a three‐dimensional architecture. The solid emission of (I) in the crystalline form exhibited a 170 nm red shift compared with that in the solution state. The observed optical bandgap for (I) is 3.22 eV and a cyclic voltammetry experiment confirmed the energy levels of the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) and the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO). The calculated bandgap for (I) is 3.37 eV, which is very close to the experimental result. In addition, the polarizability and hyperpolarizability of (I) were appraised for its further application in second‐order nonlinear optical materials.     

Three different fluoro‐ or chloro‐substituted 1′‐deoxy‐1′‐phenyl‐β‐D‐ribofuranoses

Crystal structures are reported for three fluoro‐ or chloro‐substituted 1′‐deoxy‐1′‐phenyl‐β‐D‐ribofuranoses, namely 1′‐deoxy‐1′‐(2,4,5‐trifluorophenyl)‐β‐D‐ribofuranose, C₁₁H₁₁F₃O₄, (I), 1′‐deoxy‐1′‐(2,4,6‐trifluorophenyl)‐β‐D‐ribofuranose, C₁₁H₁₁F₃O₄, (II), and 1′‐(4‐chlorophenyl)‐1′‐deoxy‐β‐D‐ribofuranose, C₁₁H₁₃ClO₄, (III). The five‐membered furanose ring of the three compounds has a conformation between a C2′‐endo,C3′‐exo twist and a C2′‐endo envelope. The ribofuranose groups of (I) and (III) are connected by intermolecular O—H...O hydrogen bonds to six symmetry‐related molecules to form double layers, while the ribofuranose group of (II) is connected by O—H...O hydrogen bonds to four symmetry‐related molecules to form single layers. The O...O contact distance of the O—H...O hydrogen bonds ranges from 2.7172 (15) to 2.8895 (19) Å. Neighbouring double layers of (I) are connected by a very weak intermolecular C—F...π contact. The layers of (II) are connected by one C—H...O and two C—H...F contacts, while the double layers of (III) are connected by a C—H...Cl contact. The conformations of the molecules are compared with those of seven related molecules. The orientation of the benzene ring is coplanar with the H—C1′ bond or bisecting the H—C1′—C2′ angle, or intermediate between these positions. The orientation of the benzene ring is independent of the substitution pattern of the ring and depends mainly on crystal‐packing effects.     

2‐Bromo‐1,3‐bis[2‐(2‐naphthyl)vinyl]benzene benzene hemisolvate and 9‐bromodinaphth[1,2‐a:2′,1′‐j]anthracene

2‐Bromo‐1,3‐bis[2‐(2‐naphthyl)vinyl]benzene benzene hemisolvate, C₃₀H₂₁Br·0.5C₆H₆, (I), with two formula units in the asymmetric unit, exists in the crystal structure in a conformation in which the trans (2‐naphthyl)vinyl substituents on the central bromobenzene moiety appear as nearly fully extended `wings', while 9‐bromodinaphth[1,2‐a:2′,1′‐j]anthracene, C<sub>30</sub>H<sub>17</sub>Br, (II), adopts a highly nonplanar `manta‐ray' shape, with the H atoms in the interior of the molecule within van der Waals contact distances. The packing of the significantly twisted molecules of (I) generates large voids which are filled by benzene solvent molecules, while molecules of (II) stack compactly with all C—Br bonds parallel within the stack.     

Self‐assembly of a one‐dimensional iron(II) coordination polymer with p‐phenylenebis(picolinaldimine)

catena‐Poly[[[dichloridoiron(II)]‐μ‐N,N′‐bis(2‐pyridylmethylene)benzene‐1,4‐diamine] methanol disolvate], [FeCl₂(C₁₈H₁₄N₄)]·2CH₃OH, forms a one‐dimensional coordination polymer. The polymeric chains run parallel to the c axis. O—H...Cl—Fe and C—H...O hydrogen‐bonding interactions with methanol solvent molecules stabilize the open supramolecular framework. Each Fe^II atom adopts an octahedral geometry coordinated by four N atoms from two N,N′‐bis(2‐pyridylmethylene)benzene‐1,4‐diamine ligands and completed by two cis Cl atoms. The compound has C₂ (and C_i) molecular symmetry, which is coincident with the crystallographic twofold symmetry at (0, y, ). The one‐dimensional structure is propagated via the crystallographic inversion center located at the benzene ring centroid (0, , 0).