Characterisation of five technical mixtures of brominated flame retardants

The main components of five technical mixtures of brominated flame retardants were identified by mass spectroscopy, H-NMR, IR spectroscopy, elementary analysis, and HRGC-MS, respectively. The mixtures have been identified as: phosphoric acid bromopropylates: Bromcal P 67-6 HP; C18-alkylated bromophenols: Bromcal P 40-3; dibromopropyl-2,4,6-tribromophenyl ether: Bromcal 73-5 PE; brominated diphenyl ethers (PBrDE): Bromcal 70-5 DE; decabromodiphenyl ether: Bromcal 82-0. Gas chromatographic retention data of the various constituents were measured on standard GC columns. The data prove the interference of some of the brominated compounds with PCBs and other halogenated pesticides in HRGC using the electron capture detector.     

Recent developments in the analysis of brominated flame retardants and brominated natural compounds

This article reviews recent literature on the analysis of brominated flame retardants (BFRs) and brominated natural compounds (BNCs). The main literature sources are reviews from the last five years and research articles reporting new analytical developments published between 2003 and 2006. Sample pretreatment, extraction, clean-up and fractionation, injection techniques, chromatographic separation, detection methods, quality control and method validation are discussed. Only few new techniques, such as solid-phase microextraction (SPME) or pressurized liquid extraction (PLE), have been investigated for their ability of combining the extraction and clean-up steps. With respect to the separation of BFRs, the most important developments were the use of comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography for polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) and the growing tendency for liquid-chromatographic techniques for hexabromocyclododecane (HBCD) stereoisomers and of tetrabromobisphenol-A (TBBP-A). At the detection stage, mass spectrometry (MS) has been developed as well-established and reliable technology in the identification and quantification of BFRs. A growing attention has been paid to quality assurance. Interlaboratory exercises directed towards BFRs have grown in popularity and have enabled laboratories to validate analytical methods and to guarantee the quality of their results. The analytical procedures used for the identification and characterization of several classes of BNCs, such as methoxylated polybrominated diphenyl ethers (MeO-PBDEs) (also metabolites of PBDEs), halogenated methyl or dimethyl bipyrroles (DBPs), are reviewed here for the first time. These compounds were generally identified during the routine analysis of BFRs and have received little attention until recently. For each topic, an overview is presented of its current status.     

A review of the analysis of novel brominated flame retardants

This review provides a summary of various analytical methodologies applied to the determination of “novel” brominated flame retardants (NBFRs) in various environmental compartments, as reported in peer reviewed literature, either in print or online, until the end of 2010. NBFRs are defined here as those brominated flame retardants (BFRs) which are either new to the market or newly/recently observed in the environment. The preparation and extraction of sediment, water, sewage sludge, soil, air and marine biota samples, the extract clean-up/fractionation and subsequent instrumental analysis of NBFRs are described and critically examined. Generally, while the instrumental analysis step mainly relies on mass-spectrometric detection specifically developed for NBFRs, and hyphenated to liquid or gas chromatography, preceding steps tend to replicate methodologies applied to the determination of traditional BFRs such as polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) and hexabromocyclododecane (HBCD). Shortcomings and gaps are discussed and recommendations for future development are given.     

Methods for the determination of phenolic brominated flame retardants, and by-products, formulation intermediates and decomposition products of brominated flame retardants in water

Brominated flame retardants (BFRs) are the chemicals of high importance within the REAch framework. In addition to polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), hexabromocyclododecane (HBCD) and tetrabromobisphenol A (TBBPA), other BFRs such as bromophenols, intermediates in FR formulation like bromoanilines, and their brominated and non-brominated by-products such as bromoanisoles, bromotoluenes, bromoalkanes and 1,5,9-cyclododecatriene, respectively should be monitored and controlled because of their toxicity and their very low odour and taste thresholds, below sub-nanogram-per liter levels. In the present study several analytical methods for the simultaneous determination, i.e., combining one single sample treatment and one analysis step, of these compounds in water have been developed, optimized and evaluated. The methods involve a (pre-concentration)-extraction technique, such as liquid-liquid (LLE), solid-phase (SPE), headspace (HS) extraction or solid-phase microextraction (SPME), followed by gas chromatography (GC)-mass spectrometry (MS) analysis with either electron capture negative ionization (ECNI) or electron impact (EI) as ionization techniques. ECNI is more sensitive than EI for analytes with more than one bromine atom. HS and SPME were previously optimized by means of a multifactorial experimental design. Extraction temperature and the liquid/headspace volume ratio were the most significant factors in HS extraction. In SPME, the variables studied were the nature of the fiber, the mode of extraction and the extraction temperature. Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) fibers appeared to be more suitable than carboxen-polydimethylsiloxane (CAR-PDMS) for the analysis of the target compounds with more than one bromine atom. The extraction of 2,4-dibromoaniline was only achieved in a direct immersion mode, in which the optimal extraction temperature was 60 degrees C. The methods LLE-GC-(ECNI)MS, LLE-GC-(EI)MS, SPE-GC-(ECNI)MS, SPE-GC-(EI)MS, HS-GC-(EI)MS and SPME-GC-(EI)MS were evaluated in terms of linearity, precision, detection limits and trueness. All methods, with the exception of HS-GC-(EI)MS, were linear in a range of at least two orders of magnitude, giving recoveries above 75% and detection limits at the low ng/L level for most of the target analytes. SPE-GC-(ECNI)MS is the most sensitive and reliable method for the determination of most of the bromine compounds, whereas SPE-GC-(EI)MS is the most suitable to quantify the three isomers of 1,5,9-cyclododecatriene. Both methods together with SPME-GC-(EI)MS (for qualitative confirmation) were applied to water samples from the Western Scheldt (The Netherlands), where 2,6-dibromophenol and 2,4,6-tribromoanisole could be detected at levels higher than their respective odour thresholds.     

Pressurised hot-water extraction of brominated flame retardants in sediment samples

Summary A pressurised, hot-water extraction (PHWE) method was developed for brominated flame-retardants in sediments. The effect of extraction time, temperature and pressure on PHWE recovery was investigated, together with solid-phase collection parameters (trapping material, length of trapping column, eluent composition). The concentrated extracts were analysed by GC-MS. PHWE recoveries were compared with those obtained by conventional Soxhlet-extraction. In general, recoveries were much higher with PHWE than with Soxhlet.     

Clean-up method for determination of established and emerging brominated flame retardants in dust

A clean-up method was developed to enable the determination of tri-decabrominated diphenyl ethers, isomer-specific hexabromocyclododecanes (HBCDs), 1,2-bis(2,4,6-tribromophenoxy)ethane (BTBPE), decabromodiphenyl ethane (DBDPE), (2-ethylhexyl)tetrabromobenzoate (TBB), and bis(2-ethylhexyl)tetrabromophthalate (TBPH) in the same dust sample extract using reasonable amounts of solvents and without dividing the sample. After extraction, the sample was separated on a silica column into three fractions that were subsequently cleaned up individually. The polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) and DBDPE were eluted in Fraction I, TBB, TBPH, and BTBPE in Fraction II, and HBCDs in Fraction III. Fractions I and II were analyzed using gas chromatography/mass spectrometry and Fraction III using liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. The method gave good recoveries (60-120%), precise results using (13)?C-labelled internal standards and was accurate when comparing results to certified values (PBDEs in NIST SRM 2585). The method was applied to dust samples from the Stockholm (Sweden) area. All the emerging brominated flame retardants (BFRs) studied, except BTBPE, were present in all the samples in quantifiable concentrations, often higher than the PBDEs. BTBPE was quantified in only one sample. It is evident that emerging BFRs are present in Swedish homes, and these compounds should be included in the BFR analyses of indoor environments.     

Sample handling and analysis of brominated flame retardants in soil and sludge samples

Brominated flame retardants (BFRs) comprise diverse chemical compounds used in a variety of commercial applications. Those used most are polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), polybrominated biphenyls (PBBs), hexabromocyclododecane (HBCD) and tetrabromobisphenol A (TBBPA). The impact of BFRs on the environment and their potential risks for animals and humans is of concern to the scientific community. A number of studies have reported analytical methods and levels of some BFRs, especially PBDEs, in sediments and biota. However, there is much less literature relating to sewage sludge and treated soil. In this article, we discuss the use of different sample-preparation techniques applied to these matrices, as well as the different approaches to mass spectrometry (MS). Finally, we review the available data concerning the occurrence of BFRs in sewage sludges, before presenting our conclusions and outlining future perspectives.     

Rapid identification of brominated flame retardants by using direct exposure probe mass spectrometry

A rapid method for analyzing brominated flame retardants (BFRs) was developed using direct exposure probe/mass spectrometry (DEP/MS). The BFRs used in this study included 1,2-bis(pentabromophenyl)ethane (EBP), tetrabromobisphenol A (TBBPA), and hexabromocyclododecane (HBCD), which are included in the Restriction of the Use of Certain Hazardous Substances in Electrical and Electronic Equipment (RoHS).Quantitative analysis was conducted using octabromodiphenyl ether (octa-BDE), nonabromodiphenyl ether (nona-BDE), and decabromodiphenyl ether (deca-BDE). The samples were extracted by ultrasonication, following which the diluted sample solutions were analyzed by DEP/MS. Finally, the characteristic ions in the mass spectra of BFRs were identified.The limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) for deca-BDE were 0.163 and 0.495 mg/kg, respectively. The calibration curve showed a linearity (R² = 0.9984) within 0.5-16 μg/mL. The relative standard deviation ranged from 2.78% to 6.76%. The octa-BDE and nona-BDE samples showed similar results. Finally, the certified reference material (CRM, NMIJ CRM 8108-a, Japan) for the deca-BDE analysis was used, and the recovery was 96.4%.     

气相色谱-质谱法测定玩具中的4种阻燃剂

建立了玩具中三(2-氯乙基)磷酸酯、磷酸三邻甲苯酯、2,2′,4,4′,5-五溴联苯醚、2,2′,3,3′,4,4′,6,6′-八溴联苯醚等4种阻燃剂的气相色谱-质谱分析方法。玩具样品以V(正己烷):V(二氯甲烷)=1:1混合溶液为提取溶剂,超声提取30min,提取液以DB-5HT石英毛细管色谱柱(15m×0.25mm×0.10μm)分离后进行选择离子监测模式下的定性及定量分析。4种阻燃剂的定量限为0.1mg/kg,在低、中、高3个添加水平范围内,4种阻燃剂的平均回收率为93.5%～97.3%,相对标准偏差在2.4%～4.1%之间。     

Versatile and fast gas chromatographic determination of frequently used brominated flame retardants in styrenic polymers

Two versatile and fast methods to identify and quantify brominated flame retardants (BrFRs) in styrenic polymers were developed. Gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) as well as gas chromatography with electron-capture detection (GC/ECD), both following ultrasonic-supported dissolution and precipitation (USDP), were applied. The substance range includes poly-brominated biphenyls (PBBs) and diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), as well as other commonly used flame retardants (FRs), including two phosphate-based flame retardants. The methods were verified using congener standards and flame-retardant polymer samples. Good recoveries were found. Overall run time for the analysis, including sample preparation, is less than 60min.     

Non-destructive rapid analysis of brominated flame retardants in electrical and electronic equipment using Raman spectroscopy.

Using Raman spectroscopy without any preparation, we analyzed the brominated flame retardant, polybromodiphenyl ethers (PBDEs), which has been prohibited by the European Union. The typical Raman bands of PBDEs, which are clearly different from those of other brominated flame retardants, are from 100 to 300 cm(-1). In our analysis, the detection limit was about 100 ppm, and the analysis took about 1 min, whereas the usual method of solvent extraction using gas chromatography/mass spectroscopy takes 50 h.     

Analytical characteristics and determination of major novel brominated flame retardants (NBFRs) in indoor dust

A new method was developed and optimized for the detection of major “novel” brominated flame retardants (NBFRs), which included decabromodiphenyl ethane (DBDPE), 1,2-bis(2,4,6-tribromophenoxy) ethane (BTBPE), tetrabromobisphenol A-bis(2,3-dibromopropylether) (TBBPA-DBPE), 2-ethylhexyl-2,3,4,5-tetrabromobenzoate (TBB), bis(2-ethylhexyl)-3,4,5,6-tetrabromophthalate (TBPH) and hexachlorocyclopentadienyl-dibromocyclooctane (HCDBCO). Several solid phase sorbents were tested, and finally, a two-step cleanup procedure was established. The first step on activated silica was used to fractionate the dust extracts, while the second step on acidified silica (silica gel impregnated with sulphuric acid 44% w/w) and on Florisil®, respectively, was essential for advanced cleanup. High recoveries for NBFRs (range, 75–94%) were achieved. Analysis was performed by gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry in electron capture negative ionization using a DB-5ms (15 m?×?0.25 mm?×?0.1 μm) capillary column. Quantification of DBDPE, BTBPE and TBBPA-DBPE was based on ion m/z 79, while characteristic ions were used for quantification of TBB (m/z 359), HCDBCO (m/z 310) and TBPH (m/z 384). The method provided good repeatability; within- and between-day precision were ≤14% for all NBFRs. Method limits of quantification ranged between 1 and 20 ng g^?1; dust and NBFRs were not detected in blanks. The method was further applied to indoor dust (n?=?21) collected from e-waste facilities in Thailand. Except for HCDBCO, all NBFRs were detected in the e-waste dust with concentrations up to 44,000 and 22,600 ng g^?1 DBDPE and BTBPE, respectively. The dust profile was dominated by DBDPE (50%)?>?BTBPE (45%)?>?TBBPA-DBPE (3%)?>?TBPH (1.9%)?>?TBB (0.1%). Significant correlations (p?相似文献   

Extraction of brominated flame retardants from polymeric waste material using different solvents and supercritical carbon dioxide

Different procedures were examined to extract pure and high concentrations of a series of brominated flame retardants from various polymer materials. These procedures include supercritical carbon dioxide (sc-CO₂), modified sc-CO₂, solvent and soxhlet extraction. Extraction with sc-CO₂ gave low extraction efficiencies (between 6 and 20%) probably due to the low pressure of sc-CO₂ used. The use of toluene, acetonitrile and THF as modifier in sc-CO₂ raised the extraction efficiencies for many flame retardants. High extraction efficiencies were achieved for tetrabromobisphenol A (TBBPA), TBBPA-bis-(2,3-dibromopropylether) (TBBPA-dbp), TBBPA-carbonatoligomer (TBBPA-co) and decabromodiphenylether (DECA) (between 93 and 100%) by using 1-propanol as solvent during soxhlet extraction. Toluene instead of 1-propanol was used where insufficient extraction of the flame retardant occurred. The materials (before and after extraction) were analysed with energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence analysis (EDXRF), high performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection (HPLC/UV), gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) and infrared spectroscopy (IR) techniques. The properties of the extracted flame retardants such as TBBPA, TBBPA-dbp and 1,2-bis(tribromophenoxy)-ethane (TBPE) are in good agreement with those of standard reference materials.     

固相萃取结合超高效液相色谱-串联质谱法及气相色谱-负化学源质谱法测定人血清中的四溴双酚A、六溴环十二烷和多溴联苯醚

建立了固相萃取同时提取、净化血清中四溴双酚A(TBBPA)、α, β, γ-六溴环十二烷(HBCD)和8种多溴联苯醚(PBDEs)同系物的样本前处理方法,并结合色谱-质谱分离分析技术检测人血清样本中该类化合物的含量。试样在加入各自的同位素内标物后以甲基叔丁基醚/正己烷(1:1, v/v)混合溶剂进行萃取,再经浓硫酸去除脂肪后,以LC-Si固相萃取柱分离HBCD/TBBPA和PBDEs。采用分步检测的方式,在50 mm长BEH C18反相色谱柱上以超高效液相色谱-串联质谱(UPLC-MS/MS)的多反应监测模式(MRM)检测HBCD和TBBPA,在15 m长的毛细管柱上以气相色谱-负化学源质谱(GC-NCI/MS)的选择离子监测模式(SIM)检测PBDEs。以胎牛血清为空白基质,当HBCD、TBBPA和BDE-209的加标水平为0.5 ng/g和5 ng/g、三溴至七溴联苯醚的加标水平为0.05 ng/g和0.5 ng/g时,它们的平均加标回收率为80.3%～108.8%,相对标准偏差为1.02%～11.42%(n=5);以信噪比(S/N)为3计算,方法的检出限(LOD)为1.81～42.16 pg/g。采用该方法对实际样品进行测定,结果表明,本方法快速、准确、灵敏度高,能够满足血清中HBCD、TBBPA和PBDEs残留的同时提取及测定的要求。     

New multiresidue analytical method dedicated to trace level measurement of brominated flame retardants in human biological matrices

A new method has been developed for the multi-residue measurement of the main brominated flame retardants (alpha- and gamma-hexabromocyclododecane (HBCD), tetrabromobisphenol A (TBBP-A) and polybrominated diphenyl ethers including decabromodiphenyl ether) in human biological matrices (serum, adipose tissue and breast milk). The proposed sample preparation procedure focused on reduced solvent and consumable consumption and associated procedural contamination, as well as reduced sample size. This protocol was fully validated and was proved to be suitable for identification of brominated flame retardant residues at ultra-trace level, as attested by preliminary results on real samples.     

Comparison of analytical strategies for the chromatographic and mass spectrometric measurement of brominated flame retardants: 1. Polybrominated diphenylethers

The chromatographic and mass spectrometric (MS) behaviors of 49 polybrominated diphenylether (PBDE) homologues toward various techniques is investigated. Special attention is paid to chromatographic separation, ionization processes, and signal acquisition modes. Different liquid chromatographic (LC) separation systems and gas chromatographic (GC) temperature program parameters are studied. For LC-MS experiments, the ionization efficiencies of electrospray, atmospheric pressure chemical ionization, and atmospheric pressure photoionization (APPI) are evaluated. For GC-MS experiments, negative chemical ionization with ammonia as reagent gas as well as negative and positive electron impact (EI) ionization are studied. Thus, fragmentation pathways of PBDEs are investigated, with the main objective being to determine the sensitivity/specificity balance of each tested technique with respect to their potential respective application (parent compound focusing, metabolite identification, and screening of analogue compounds). Finally, performances of the different tested techniques are compared and evaluated in terms of detection limits on standard solutions for each homologue group. In terms of ionization, EI remains the best compromise between sensitivity and specificity with possible complementary applications in MS-MS and high-resolution MS. Nevertheless, APPI appears to be a promising alternative.     

New approach based on solid-phase microextraction to estimate polydimethylsiloxane fibre coating-water distribution coefficients for brominated flame retardants

A depletion solid-phase microextraction (SPME) method based on multiple SPME extraction was applied to estimate fibre coating-water distribution constants (Kfs) of brominated flame retardants. Several polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) including compounds present in the commercial mixture "Pentamix", and two polybrominated biphenyls (PBBs) were considered as target analytes. One hundred-micrometer poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) coating fibre was selected to estimate partition coefficients. SPME kinetics studies at 25 and 100 degrees C were performed. Kfs values obtained at both temperatures for brominated flame retardants were compared with the corresponding octanol-water partition coefficients (Kow) values found in literature. A linear log-log relationship between Kow with Kfs was found. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study where brominated flame retardants Kfs values are estimated.     

A hybrid monolithic column based on flower-shaped zeolitic imidazolate framework for efficient capillary microextraction of brominated flame retardants

A novel flower-shaped zeolitic imidazolate framework (ZIF) doped organic-inorganic hybrid monolithic column (ZIF-HMC) was prepared by a simple sol-gel “one-step” method and utilized for efficient capillary microextraction (CME) of four brominated flame retardants. The prepared monolithic was characterized by Fourier transform infrared, scanning electron microscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, energy disperse spectroscopy, and N₂ adsorption-desorption. The parameters of CME were optimized by orthogonal array design. Under the optimal conditions, the ZIF-HMC showed excellent extraction efficiency, the limit of detection (LODs) and the limit of quantification (LOQs) were in the range of 0.52∼3.1 μg/L and 1.7∼10 μg/L, respectively, and the proposed method demonstrated good recovery (88.8%–116.6%) with the RSD less than 13.6% and a reusability of at least 30 times. The ZIF-HMC possessed great potential for separating organic pollutants and the strategy used here could be extended to prepare other derivatized HMC functionalized monoliths.     

Advances in the study of current-use non-PBDE brominated flame retardants and dechlorane plus in the environment and humans

The fate of the high production volume,currently in use,and not regulated non-polybrominated diphenyl ether(PBDE) flame retardants,such as tetrabromobisphenol A(TBBPA) ,hexabromocyclododecane(HBCD) and dechlorane plus(DP),and the alternative flame retardants of PBDE,such as BTBPE and DBDPE,in the environment has attracted increasing attention and aroused concern due to the increasing regulation and phasing-out of PBDEs.This paper reviews the distribution,bioaccumulation,human exposure and environmental beha...