Central semicommutative rings

A ring R is central semicommutative if ab = 0 implies that aRb ? Z(R) for any a, b ∈ R. Since every semicommutative ring is central semicommutative, we study sufficient condition for central semicommutative rings to be semicommutative. We prove that some results of semicommutative rings can be extended to central semicommutative rings for this general settings, in particular, it is shown that every central semicommutative ring is nil-semicommutative. We show that the class of central semicommutative rings lies strictly between classes of semicommutative rings and abelian rings. For an Armendariz ring R, we prove that R is central semicommutative if and only if the polynomial ring R[x] is central semicommutative. Moreover, for a central semicommutative ring R, it is proven that (1) R is strongly regular if and only if R is a left GP-V′-ring whose maximal essential left ideals are GW-ideals if and only if R is a left GP-V′-ring whose maximal essential right ideals are GW-ideals. (2) If R is a left SF and central semicommutative ring, then R is a strongly regular ring.     

On Weak Armendariz Rings

We introduce weak Armendariz rings which are a generalization of semicommutative rings and Armendariz rings, and investigate their properties. Moreover, we prove that a ring R is weak Armendariz if and only if for any n, the n-by-n upper triangular matrix ring T _n (R) is weak Armendariz. If R is semicommutative, then it is proven that the polynomial ring R[x] over R and the ring R[x]/(x ⁿ ), where (x ⁿ ) is the ideal generated by x ⁿ and n is a positive integer, are weak Armendariz.     

Nil-Armendariz Rings Relative to a Monoid

For a monoid M, we introduce nil-Armendariz rings relative to M, which are a generalization of nil-Armendariz and M-Armendariz rings, and investigate their properties. First we show that semicommutative rings are nil-Armendariz relative to every unique product monoid M. Also it is shown that for a strictly totally ordered monoid M and an ideal I of R, if I is a semicommutative subrng of R and R/I nil-Armendariz relative to M, then R is nil-Armendariz relative to M. Then we show that if R is a semicommutative ring and nil-Armendariz relative to M, then R is nil-Armendariz relative to M × N, where N is a unique product monoid. As corollaries we obtain some results of [2] and [10].     

On rings in which every maximal one-sided ideal contains a maximal ideal

Given a ring R, consider the condition: (^*) every maximal right ideal of R contains a maximal ideal of R. We show that, for a ring R and 0 ≠ e ² = e ∈ R such that ele ? eRe every proper ideal I of R R satisfies (^*) if and only if eRe satisfies (^*). Hence with the help of some other results, (^*) is a Morita invariant property. For a simple ring R R[x] satisfies (^*) if and only if R[x] is not right primitive. By this result, if R is a division ring and R[x] satisfies (^*), then the Jacobson conjecture holds. We also show that for a finite centralizing extension S of a ring R R satisfies (^*) if and only if S satisfies (^*).     

Armendariz Properties Relative to a Ring Endomorphism

For an endomorphism α of a ring R, we introduce the notion of an α-Armendariz ring to investigate the relative Armendariz properties. This concept extends the class of Armendariz rings and gives us an opportunity to study Armendariz rings in a general setting. It is obvious that every Armendariz ring is an α-Armendariz ring, but we shall give an example to show that there exists a right α-Armendariz ring which is not Armendariz. A number of properties of this version are established. It is shown that if I is a reduced ideal of a ring R such that R/I is a right α-Armendariz ring, then R is right α-Armendariz. For an endomorphism α of a ring R, we show that R is right α-Armendariz if and only if R[x] is right α-Armendariz. Moreover, a weak form of α-Armendariz rings is considered in the last section. We show that in general weak α-Armendariz rings need not be α-Armendariz.     

Coquasitriangular Hopf Group Algebras and Drinfel'd Co-Doubles

A ring R is called “semicommutative” if any right annihilator over R is an ideal of R. We show that special subrings of upper triangular matrix rings over a reduced ring are maximal semicommutative. Consequently, new families of semicommutative rings are presented.     

How far can we go with Amitsur’s theorem in differential polynomial rings?

A well-known theorem by S. A. Amitsur shows that the Jacobson radical of the polynomial ring R[x] equals I[x] for some nil ideal I of R. In this paper, however, we show that this is not the case for differential polynomial rings, by proving that there is a ring R which is not nil and a derivation D on R such that the differential polynomial ring R[x;D] is Jacobson radical. We also show that, on the other hand, the Amitsur theorem holds for a differential polynomial ring R[x;D], provided that D is a locally nilpotent derivation and R is an algebra over a field of characteristic p > 0. The main idea of the proof introduces a new way of embedding differential polynomial rings into bigger rings, which we name platinum rings, plus a key part of the proof involves the solution of matrix theory-based problems.     

Uppers to zero in R[x] and almost principal ideals

Let R be an integral domain with quotient field K and f(x) a polynomial of positive degree in K[x]. In this paper we develop a method for studying almost principal uppers to zero ideals. More precisely, we prove that uppers to zero divisorial ideals of the form I = f(x)K[x] ∩ R[x] are almost principal in the following two cases:

• J, the ideal generated by the leading coefficients of I, satisfies J ^?1 = R.
• I ^?1 as the R[x]-submodule of K(x) is of finite type.

Furthermore we prove that for I = f(x)K[x] ∩ R[x] we have:

• I ^?1 ∩ K[x] = (I: K(x) I).
• If there exists p/q ∈ I ^?1 ? K[x], then (q, f) ≠ 1 in K[x]. If in addition q is irreducible and I is almost principal, then I′ = q(x)K[x] ∩ R[x] is an almost principal upper to zero.

Finally we show that a Schreier domain R is a greatest common divisor domain if and only if every upper to zero in R[x] contains a primitive polynomial.     

Weakly regular rings with ACC on annihilators and maximality of strongly prime ideals of weakly regular rings

Ramamurthi proved that weak regularity is equivalent to regularity and biregularity for left Artinian rings. We observe this result under a generalized condition. For a ring R satisfying the ACC on right annihilators, we actually prove that if R is left weakly regular then R is biregular, and that R is left weakly regular if and only if R is a direct sum of a finite number of simple rings. Next we study maximality of strongly prime ideals, showing that a reduced ring R is weakly regular if and only if R is left weakly regular if and only if R is left weakly π-regular if and only if every strongly prime ideal of R is maximal.     

Extensions of zip rings

A ring R is called right zip provided that if the right annihilator r_R(X) of a subset X of R is zero, r_R(Y)=0 for a finite subset Y⊆X. Faith [5] raised the following questions: When does R being a right zip ring imply R[x] being right zip?; Characterize a ring R such that Mat_n(R) is right zip; When does R being a right zip ring imply R[G] being right zip when G is a finite group? In this note, we continue the study of the extensions of noncommutative zip rings based on Faith's questions.     

On Rings Whose Reflexive Ideals are Principal

We call a prime Noetherian maximal order R a pseudo-principal ring if every reflexive ideal of R is principal. This class of rings is a broad class properly containing both prime Noetherian pri-(pli) rings and Noetherian unique factorization rings (UFRs). We show that the class of pseudo-principal rings is closed under formation of n × n full matrix rings. Moreover, we prove that if R is a pseudo-principal ring, then the polynomial ring R[x] is also a pseudo-principal ring. We provide examples to illustrate our results.     

Reversibility of Rings with Respect to the Jacobson Radical

Let R be a ring with identity and J(R) denote the Jacobson radical of R. A ring R is called J-reversible if for any a, \(b \in R\), \(ab = 0\) implies \(ba \in J(R)\). In this paper, we give some properties of J-reversible rings. We prove that some results of reversible rings can be extended to J-reversible rings for this general setting. We show that J-quasipolar rings, local rings, semicommutative rings, central reversible rings and weakly reversible rings are J-reversible. As an application it is shown that every J-clean ring is directly finite.     

Polynomial rings over commutative reduced Hopfian local rings

We prove that if R is a commutative, reduced, local ring, then R is Hopfian if and only if the ring R[x] is Hopfian. This answers a question of Varadarajan [16], in the case when R is a reduced local ring. We provide examples of non-Noetherian Hopfian commutative domains by proving that the finite dimensional domains are Hopfian. Also, we derive some general results related to Hopfian rings.     

Engel type identities with derivations for right ideals in prime rings

Let R be a prime ring of char R≠2, d a non-zero derivation of R and ρ a non-zero right ideal of R such that [[d(x),d(y)]_n [y,x]_m] = 0 for all x,y ∈ ρ or [[d(x),d(y)]_n d[y,x]_m] = 0 for all x,y ∈ ρ, n, m ≥ 0 are fixed integers. If [ρ,ρ]ρ ≠ 0, then d(ρ)ρ = 0.     

Characterizations of schunck classes of finite groups

We prove a number of results concerning Armendariz rings and Gaussian rings. Recall that a (commutative) ring R is (Gaussian) Armendariz if for two polynomials f,g∈R[X] (the ideal of R generated by the coefficients of f g is the product of the ideals generated by the coefficients of f and g) fg = 0 implies a _i b _j=0 for each coefficient a _i of f and b _j of g. A number of examples of Armendariz rings are given. We show that R Armendariz implies that R[X] is Armendariz and that for R von Neumann regularR is Armendariz if and only if R is reduced. We show that R is Gaussian if and only if each homomorphic image of R is Armendariz. Characterizations of when R[X] and R[X] are Gaussian are given.     

On zero-divisors of near-rings of polynomials

In this paper, we are interested to study zero-divisor properties of a 0-symmetric nearring of polynomials R₀[x], when R is a commutative ring. We show that for a reduced ring R, the set of all zero-divisors of R₀[x], namely Z(R₀[x]), is an ideal of R₀[x] if and only if Z(R) is an ideal of R and R has Property (A). For a non-reduced ring R, it is shown that Z(R₀[x]) is an ideal of Z(R₀[x]) if and only if ann_R({a, b}) ∩ N i?(R) ≠ 0, for each a, b ∈ Z(R). We also investigate the interplay between the algebraic properties of a 0-symmetric nearring of polynomials R₀[x] and the graph-theoretic properties of its zero-divisor graph. The undirected zero-divisor graph of R₀[x] is the graph Γ(R₀[x]) such that the vertices of Γ(R₀[x]) are all the non-zero zero-divisors of R₀[x] and two distinct vertices f and g are connected by an edge if and only if f ? g = 0 or g ? f = 0. Among other results, we give a complete characterization of the possible diameters of Γ(R₀[x]) in terms of the ideals of R. These results are somewhat surprising since, in contrast to the polynomial ring case, the near-ring of polynomials has substitution for its “multiplication” operation.     

Differential polynomial rings which are generalized Asano prime rings

Let R[x; δ] be a differential polynomial ring over a prime Goldie ring R in an indeterminate x, where δ is a derivation of R. In this paper, we describe explicitly the group of δ-stable v-R-ideals and using this results, we show that R[x; δ] is a generalized Asano prime ring if and only if R is a δ-generalized Asano prime ring.     

A note on weakly clean rings

Let R be an associative ring with identity. An element x??R is said to be weakly clean if x=u+e or x=u?e for some unit u and idempotent e in R. The ring R is said to be weakly clean if all of its elements are weakly clean. In this paper we obtain an element-wise characterization of abelian weakly clean rings. A relation between unit regular rings and weakly clean rings is also obtained.     

Minimal prime ideals of skew polynomial rings and near pseudo-valuation rings

Let R be a ring. We recall that R is called a near pseudo-valuation ring if every minimal prime ideal of R is strongly prime. Let now σ be an automorphism of R and δ a σ-derivation of R. Then R is said to be an almost δ-divided ring if every minimal prime ideal of R is δ-divided. Let R be a Noetherian ring which is also an algebra over ? (? is the field of rational numbers). Let σ be an automorphism of R such that R is a σ(*)-ring and δ a σ-derivation of R such that σ(δ(a)) = δ(σ(a)) for all a ∈ R. Further, if for any strongly prime ideal U of R with σ(U) = U and δ(U) ? δ, U[x; σ, δ] is a strongly prime ideal of R[x; σ, δ], then we prove the following:

1. R is a near pseudo valuation ring if and only if the Ore extension R[x; σ, δ] is a near pseudo valuation ring.
2. R is an almost δ-divided ring if and only if R[x; σ, δ] is an almost δ-divided ring.

     

Weakly central-vertex complete graphs with applications to commutative rings

The zero-divisor graph of a commutative ring R is the graph whose vertices consist of the nonzero zero-divisors of R such that distinct vertices x and y are adjacent if and only if xy=0. In this paper, a decomposition theorem is provided to describe weakly central-vertex complete graphs of radius 1. This characterization is then applied to the class of zero-divisor graphs of commutative rings. For finite commutative rings whose zero-divisor graphs are not isomorphic to that of Z₄[X]/(X²), it is shown that weak central-vertex completeness is equivalent to the annihilator condition. Furthermore, a schema for describing zero-divisor graphs of radius 1 is provided.