基于Hausdauff度量的模糊TOPSIS方法研究

针对模糊多属性决策中的模糊 TOPSIS方法 ,提出了一种基于 Hausdauff度量的模糊 TOPSIS方法 .首先由模糊极大集与模糊极小集确定模糊多属性决策问题的理想解与负理想解 ,进而由 Hausdauff度量获得不同备选方案到理想解与负理想解的距离及其贴近度 ,根据贴近度指标对方案进行排序 ,为决策者提供决策支持 .最后以 L-R梯形模糊数为例进行了实例研究 .     

综合同异质群决策的配送中心选址研究

考虑到决策专家由于各自的专业和经验不同,提出了基于决策专家重要性的模糊多属性群决策方法解决物流配送中心选址决策问题。最终决策者根据各个专家的不同重要程度分配权重,各个专家采用语言变量对备选方案的各级准则赋予权重和评价等级。最后,通过集成和清晰化方法计算出各个配送中心备选方案的优先排序。     

基于证据推理的直觉模糊多属性群决策方法

针对属性值为直觉模糊数的多属性群决策问题,提出了一种证据推理的扩展方法。首先,在考虑主观因素与客观因素的基础上运用直觉模糊熵法计算出属性及专家的综合权重。其次,提出一种基于证据推理的直觉模糊信息融合方法,该方法可以避免由于评价值的隶属度为0而导致的信息丢失现象,弥补了现有直觉模糊信息融合方法存在的不足。在此基础上,集结评价信息并按照备选方案与理想方案的相对贴近度对备选方案进行比选。最后,运用实例验证了所提方法的有效性。     

一种基于区间q-rung Orthopair模糊投影模型的多属性群决策方法

本文提出一种基于区间q-rung Orthopair模糊投影模型的多属性群决策方法。首先,定义一种度量向量间相关程度的区间q-rung Orthopair模糊投影,研究其性质。其次,基于区间q-rung Orthopair模糊环境中各备选方案与正负理想方案之间的投影关系,提出一种基于区间q-rung Orthopair模糊投影优化模型的TOPSIS多属性群决策方法。该方法能实现对备选方案的有效排序。最后,通过将该方法应用于为制造企业选择供应商的多属性群决策问题中,验证新方法的可行性和有效性。     

毕达哥拉斯群决策方法及其在绿色供应商选取中的应用

针对专家权重未知且属性值为毕达哥拉斯模糊数的多属性群决策问题,基于证据理论和混合加权毕达哥拉斯MSM算子,提出了一种群决策方法。 首先,由决策信息矩阵获取专家的模糊测度,并赋予其相应的权重;其次,基于新构造的混合加权毕达哥拉斯MSM算子对专家所提供的属性信息分别进行集结,得到各个专家的综合评价信息;再次,利用证据合成方法,对专家综合评价信息进行融合,获得候选方案的综合证据信息,进而可知备选方案的信任区间,并据此对候选方案进行优选决策;最后,绿色供应商选取案例的分析与对比验证了方法的可行性与合理性。     

模糊多属性决策的直觉模糊集方法

基于直觉模糊集理论,提出了一种新的TOPSIS方法来研究模糊多属性决策问题。首先,根据直觉模糊集的几何意义,定义了两个直觉模糊集之间的距离,且每个备选方案的评价值用直觉模糊值表示;然后,根据TOPSIS原理,通过计算备选方案到直觉模糊正理想解和负理想解的距离,来确定备选方案的综合评价指数,以此判断方案的优劣次序。最后,通过一个具体实例说明该方法的有效性和具体应用过程。     

基于TOPSIS的模糊群体多属性决策方法

针对模糊群体多属性决策问题,给出一种基于理想点法(TOPSIS)的多属性决策方法.方法先用三角模糊数的形式表示专家评价值的模糊性和不确定性,而后考虑了专家在不同评价属性中的重要程度和意见的相似度,并将专家意见进行集结得到专家群体关于方案集的模糊决策矩阵,最后定义了三角模糊数形式的正负理想方案,通过计算各方案与正负理想方案的距离以及各方案与理想点的相对接近度,最终确定最优方案.通过实例分析说明了该方法的可行性和有效性.     

基于直觉模糊集的多属性决策方法

对基于直觉模糊信息的多属性决策问题进行了研究,引入了直觉模糊数的得分函数、直觉模糊正理想点和负理想点,然后给出了基于TOPSIS的多属性决策方法,通过计算各备选方案的得分向量与直觉模糊负理想点得分向量之间的距离来确定各备选方案的综合评价指数,进而判断方案的优劣次序.最后,通过一个具体的实例分析说明了该方法的有效性与具体应用过程.     

一种新的模糊TOPSIS决策方法

TOPSIS方法是多准则决策中常用的一种方法.但是该方法无法有效处理决策中的模糊信息,本文提出了一种模糊环境下的TOPSIS方法.在用三角模糊数对语言变量表示的基础上,决策过程中的各个准则的权重和各个备选方案的等级均采用语言变量来描述,这些语言变量由专家确定.为降低决策中的计算量,引入了模糊数的等级均值积分表示,在决策过程中将模糊数计算转化为简单的实数运算.这一优点使得决策中可以避免求解模糊数之间的距离和对模糊数排序.利用一个多准则决策的算例验证了该方法的有效性.     

基于专家对应准则的犹豫模糊多属性群决策方法

本文研究了属性值为犹豫模糊数且决策者对方案有偏好的模糊多属性群决策问题。将犹豫模糊集进行标准化处理是多属性群决策问题的重要步骤。现有的方法是将犹豫模糊元按大小排序,基于乐观或悲观准则扩充犹豫模糊集。本文指出了该方法的不足之处,并提出了一种基于专家对应准则的犹豫模糊多属性群决策方法。首先,记录专家组中的专家编号,依次建立犹豫模糊决策矩阵;然后,基于专家对应准则扩充犹豫模糊集,通过扩充后的矩阵得到专家权重;接下来,聚合犹豫模糊矩阵,根据得分函数计算方案的优劣次序;最后,通过实例分析说明该方法的有效性。     

Projection method for multiple criteria group decision making with incomplete weight information in linguistic setting

Multiple criteria group decision making (MCGDM) problems have become a very active research field over the last decade. Many practical problems are often characterized by MCGDM. The aim of this paper is to develop a new approach for MCGDM problems with incomplete weight information in linguistic setting based on the projection method. Firstly, to reflect the reality accurately, a method to determine the weights of decision makers in linguistic setting is proposed by calculating the degree of similarity between 2-tuple linguistic decision matrix given by each decision maker and the average 2-tuple linguistic decision matrix. By using the weights of decision makers, all individual 2-tuple linguistic decision matrices are aggregated into a collective one. Then, to determine the weight vector of criteria, we establish a non-linear optimization model based on the basic ideal of the projection method, i.e., the optimal alternative should have the largest projection on the 2-tuple linguistic positive ideal solution (TLPIS). Calculate the 2-tuple linguistic projection of each alternative on the TLPIS and rank all the alternatives according to the 2-tuple linguistic projection value. Finally, an illustrative example is given to demonstrate the calculation process of the proposed method, and the validity is verified by comparing the evaluation results of the proposed method with that of the technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) method.     

An improved TOPSIS with weighted hesitant vague information

The selection of the best alternatives in project management has attracted increasing attention due to the uncertain environment. Vague TOPSIS is one of the powerful methods to solve this problem. In this work, firstly, a method of measuring the similarities of vague set which can take the uncertainty preference into account is raised and comparison between methods has been made to verify its effectiveness. Then, a vague set based TOPSIS in group decision is proposed to aid the decision making in project management. In this method, the weights of the experts for different criteria in the group decision are completely unknown and are calculated with the similarities of the judgments by them in the project. Finally, a computation example is shown to illustrate the method.     

基于Vague集信息的多属性群决策专家水平评判方法

针对基于Vague集信息的多属性群决策专家水平评判问题提出了两种评判方法.首先引进了基于Vague集信息的多属性群决策信息体(即决策信息体)的相关概念,通过决策信息体构造了基于Vague集信息的一致性决策矩阵及模糊熵,其次利用Vague集信息的相似度量以及Vague集信息的模糊熵两种信息不确定性度量方法,对基于Vague集信息的多属性群决策专家水平评判问题提出了两种评判方法,即统计分析方法和模糊熵分析方法,对专家的评判水平进行排序.最后,通过一个算例说明两种方法的一致性、有效性和实用性.     

Comparison of first aggregation and last aggregation in fuzzy group TOPSIS

The Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to the Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), one of the major multi attribute decision making (MADM) techniques, ranks the alternatives according to their distances from the ideal and the negative ideal solution. In real evaluation and decision making problems, it is vital to involve several people and experts from different functional areas in decision making process. Also under many conditions, crisp data are inadequate to model real-life situations, since human judgments including preferences are often vague and cannot estimate his preference with an exact numerical value. Therefore aggregation of fuzzy concept, group decision making and TOPSIS methods that we denote “fuzzy group TOPSIS” is more practical than original TOPSIS.     

A new method for multiple criteria group decision making with incomplete weight information under linguistic environment

A new method is proposed to solve multiple criteria group decision making (MCGDM) problems, in which both the criteria values and criteria weights take the form of linguistic information, and the information about linguistic criteria weights is partly known or completely unknown. Firstly, to get reasonable decision result, instead of assigning the same weight to the decision maker (DM) for all criteria, we propose a method to determine the weight of DM with respect to each criterion under linguistic environment by calculating the similarity degree between individual 2-tuple linguistic evaluation value and the mean given by all decision makers (DMs). Secondly, for the situations where the information about the criteria weights is partly known or completely unknown, we establish optimization models to determine the criteria weights by defining 2-tuple linguistic positive ideal solution (TL-PIS), 2-tuple linguistic right negative ideal solution (TL-RNIS) and 2-tuple linguistic left negative ideal solution (TL-LNIS) of the collective 2-tuple linguistic decision matrix. Thirdly, we propose a new method to solve MCGDM problems with partly known or completely unknown linguistic weight information. Finally, an illustrative example is given to demonstrate the calculation process of the proposed method.     

Group decision making based on novel fuzzy modified TOPSIS method

The aim of this paper is to present a novel fuzzy modified technique of order preference by a similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) method by a group of experts, which can select the best alternative by considering both conflicting quantitative and qualitative evaluation criteria in real-life applications. The proposed method satisfies the condition of being the closest to the fuzzy positive ideal solution and also being the farthest from the fuzzy negative ideal solution with multi-judges and multi-criteria. The performance rating values of alternatives versus conflicting criteria as well as the weights of criteria are described by linguistic variables and are transformed into triangular fuzzy numbers. Then a new collective index is introduced to discriminate among alternatives in the evaluation process with respect to subjective judgment and objective information. This paper shows that the proposed fuzzy modified TOPSIS method is a suitable decision making tool for the manufacturing decisions with two examples for the robot selection and rapid prototyping process selection.     

Combining compound linguistic ordinal scale and cognitive pairwise comparison in the rectified fuzzy TOPSIS method for group decision making

Group decision making is the process to explore the best choice among the screened alternatives under predefined criteria with corresponding weights from assessment of a group of decision makers. The Fuzzy TOPSIS taking an evaluated fuzzy decision matrix as input is a popular tool to analyze the ideal alternative. This research, however, finds that the classical fuzzy TOPSIS produces a misleading result due to some inappropriate definitions, and proposes the rectified fuzzy TOPSIS addressing two technical problems. As the decision accuracy also depends on the evaluation quality of the fuzzy decision matrix comprising rating scores and weights, this research applies compound linguistic ordinal scale as the fuzzy rating scale for expert judgments, and cognitive pairwise comparison for determining the fuzzy weights. The numerical case of a robot selection problem demonstrates the hybrid approach leading to the much reliable result for decision making, comparing with the conventional fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process and TOPSIS.     

基于区间数贴近度的不确定多属性决策模型

针对只有部分权重信息且属性值以区间数形式给出的多属性决策问题,提出了一种基于区间数贴近度的决策方法.首先讨论了区间数贴近度的定义和性质;然后给出了解决不确定多属性决策问题的一般步骤.并依据传统的逼近理想解的基本思路,以实际评价值与理想解之间的贴近度最大化为目标建立优化模型,从而得到指标权重.进而计算出每个方案与正理想解的相对贴近度,即可得到所有方案的排序结果.方法能充分利用规范化评价的先验信息,评价结果客观可靠,不具有主观随意性.最后通过实例分析验证了该方法的有效性和实用性.     

Vague集相似度量模型

Vague集的相似度量在模糊推理、模式识别、聚类分析、决策分析等领域的广泛运用,要求所建立的vague集相似度量模型具有较高的区分度及度量结果合乎人的直觉.基于此要求,首先对已有Vague值的相似度量模型在区分度上的不足进行了分析.然后,在分析地基础上,提出了vague值的相似度量建模须考虑的因素.最后建立了Vague集的相似度量模型.数值实验表明,新模型具有较好的区分度,能克服已有模型在区分度上的不足.