C?C Cross‐Coupling Reactions of O6‐Alkyl‐2‐Haloinosine Derivatives and a One‐Pot Cross‐Coupling/O6‐Deprotection Procedure

Reaction conditions for the C? C cross‐coupling of O⁶‐alkyl‐2‐bromo‐ and 2‐chloroinosine derivatives with aryl‐, hetaryl‐, and alkylboronic acids were studied. Optimization experiments with silyl‐protected 2‐bromo‐O⁶‐methylinosine led to the identification of [PdCl₂(dcpf)]/K₃PO₄ in 1,4‐dioxane as the best conditions for these reactions (dcpf=1,1′‐bis(dicyclohexylphosphino)ferrocene). Attempted O⁶‐demethylation, as well as the replacement of the C‐6 methoxy group by amines, was unsuccessful, which led to the consideration of Pd‐cleavable groups such that C? C cross‐coupling and O⁶‐deprotection could be accomplished in a single step. Thus, inosine 2‐chloro‐O⁶‐allylinosine was chosen as the substrate and, after re‐evaluation of the cross‐coupling conditions with 2‐chloro‐O⁶‐methylinosine as a model substrate, one‐step C? C cross‐coupling/deprotection reactions were performed with the O⁶‐allyl analogue. These reactions are the first such examples of a one‐pot procedure for the modification and deprotection of purine nucleosides under C? C cross‐coupling conditions.     

Metal‐Free CC Coupling Reactions with Tetraguanidino‐Functionalized Pyridines and Light

Herein we report on metal‐free C?C coupling reactions mediated by the pyridine derivative 2,3,6,7‐tetrakis(tetramethylguanidino)pyridine under the action of visible light. The rate‐determining step is the homolytic N?C bond cleavage of the initially formed N‐alkyl pyridinium ion upon excitation with visible light. The released alkyl radicals subsequently dimerize to the C?C coupling product. 2,3,6,7‐Tetrakis(tetramethylguanidino)pyridine, which is a strong electron donor (E_1/2(CH₂Cl₂)=?0.76 V vs. ferrocene) is oxidized to the dication. For alkyl=benzyl and allyl, relatively high first‐order rate constants of 0.23±0.03 and 0.13±0.03 s^?1 were determined. Regeneration of neutral 2,3,6,7‐tetrakis(tetramethylguanidino)‐pyridine by reduction allows to drive the process in a cycle.     

Synthesis of trans‐Disubstituted Alkenes by Cobalt‐Catalyzed Reductive Coupling of Terminal Alkynes with Activated Alkenes

A cobalt‐catalyzed reductive coupling of terminal alkynes, RC?CH, with activated alkenes, R′CH?CH₂, in the presence of zinc and water to give functionalized trans‐disubstituted alkenes, RCH?CHCH₂CH₂R′, is described. A variety of aromatic terminal alkynes underwent reductive coupling with activated alkenes including enones, acrylates, acrylonitrile, and vinyl sulfones in the presence of a CoCl₂/P(OMe)₃/Zn catalyst system to afford 1,2‐trans‐disubstituted alkenes with high regio‐ and stereoselectivity. Similarly, aliphatic terminal alkynes also efficiently participated in the coupling reaction with acrylates, enones, and vinyl sulfone, in the presence of the CoCl₂/P(OPh)₃/Zn system providing a mixture of 1,2‐trans‐ and 1,1‐disubstituted functionalized terminal alkene products in high yields. The scope of the reaction was also extended by the coupling of 1,3‐enynes and acetylene gas with alkenes. Furthermore, a phosphine‐free cobalt‐catalyzed reductive coupling of terminal alkynes with enones, affording 1,2‐trans‐disubstituted alkenes as the major products in a high regioisomeric ratio, is demonstrated. In the reactions, less expensive and air‐stable cobalt complexes, a mild reducing agent (Zn) and a simple hydrogen source (water) were used. A possible reaction mechanism involving a cobaltacyclopentene as the key intermediate is proposed.     

Ruthenium‐Catalyzed Alkylation of Indoles with Tertiary Amines by Oxidation of a sp3 C?H Bond and Lewis Acid Catalysis

Ruthenium porphyrins (particularly [Ru(2,6‐Cl₂tpp)CO]; tpp=tetraphenylporphinato) and RuCl₃ can act as oxidation and/or Lewis acid catalysts for direct C‐3 alkylation of indoles, giving the desired products in high yields (up to 82 % based on 60–95 % substrate conversions). These ruthenium compounds catalyze oxidative coupling reactions of a wide variety of anilines and indoles bearing electron‐withdrawing or electron‐donating substituents with high regioselectivity when using tBuOOH as an oxidant, resulting in the alkylation of N‐arylindoles to 3‐{[(N‐aryl‐N‐alkyl)amino]methyl}indoles (yield: up to 82 %, conversion: up to 95 %) and the alkylation of N‐alkyl or N‐H indoles to 3‐[p‐(dialkylamino)benzyl]indoles (yield: up to 73 %, conversion: up to 92 %). A tentative reaction mechanism involving two pathways is proposed: an iminium ion intermediate may be generated by oxidation of an sp³ C? H bond of the alkylated aniline by an oxoruthenium species; this iminium ion could then either be trapped by an N‐arylindole (pathway A) or converted to formaldehyde, allowing a subsequent three‐component coupling reaction of the in situ generated formaldehyde with an N‐alkylindole and an aniline in the presence of a Lewis acid catalyst (pathway B). The results of deuterium‐labeling experiments are consistent with the alkylation of N‐alkylindoles via pathway B. The relative reaction rates of [Ru(2,6‐Cl₂tpp)CO]‐catalyzed oxidative coupling reactions of 4‐X‐substituted N,N‐dimethylanilines with N‐phenylindole (using tBuOOH as oxidant), determined through competition experiments, correlate linearly with the substituent constants σ (R²=0.989), giving a ρ value of ?1.09. This ρ value and the magnitudes of the intra‐ and intermolecular deuterium isotope effects (k_H/k_D) suggest that electron transfer most likely occurs during the initial stage of the oxidation of 4‐X‐substituted N,N‐dimethylanilines. Ruthenium‐catalyzed three‐component reaction of N‐alkyl/N‐H indoles, paraformaldehyde, and anilines gave 3‐[p‐(dialkylamino)benzyl]indoles in up to 82 % yield (conversion: up to 95 %).     

Palladium‐catalysed P?C bond forming reactions between diphenylphosphine and ortho‐substituted aryl bromides

The use of palladium catalysts derived from 1,1′‐bis‐diisopropylphosphino‐ferrocene and a microwave heating source allows the coupling of a range of ortho‐substituted aryl bromides to diphenylphosphine derivatives to proceed in good yield in under 30 min. Optimization studies reveal that the combination of diphenylphosphine and DABCO is superior to more basic phosphide nucleophiles such as Ph₂PK or Ph₂PMgBr. High yields are only observed when moderately bulky electron rich diphosphines are used as ligands. The differences between P? C coupling and other cross‐coupling reactions are discussed in the light of the reactivity observed. Studies aimed at producing industrially important 1,2‐bis‐phosphino‐benzene ligands are also described. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Reactions of rac‐(ebthi)M(η2‐Me3SiC2SiMe3) (M=Ti,Zr) with Aryl Nitriles

The reactions of the Group 4 metallocene alkyne complexes rac‐(ebthi)M(η²‐Me₃SiC₂SiMe₃) ( 1 a : M=Ti, 1 b : M=Zr; rac‐(ebthi)=rac‐1,2‐ethylene‐1,1′‐bis(η⁵‐tetrahydroindenyl)) with Ph?C?N were investigated. For 1 a , an unusual nitrile–nitrile coupling to 1‐titana‐2,5‐diazacyclopenta‐2,4‐diene ( 2 ) at ambient temperature was observed. At higher temperature, the C?C coupling of two nitriles resulted in the formation of a dinuclear complex with a four‐membered diimine bridge ( 3 ). The reaction of 1 b with Ph?C?N afforded dinuclear compound 4 and 2,4,6‐triphenyltriazine. Additionally, the reactivity of 1 b towards other nitriles was investigated.     

Synthesis of α‐(Fluorophenyl)pyridine by Palladium‐Catalyzed Cross‐Coupling Reaction

A series of α‐(fluoro‐substituted phenyl)pyridines have been synthesized by means of a palladium‐catalyzed cross‐coupling reaction between fluoro‐substituted phenylboronic acid and 2‐bromopyridine or its derivatives. The reactivities of the phenylboronic acids containing di‐ and tri‐fluoro substituents with α‐pyridyl bromide were investigated in different catalyst systems. Unsuccessful results were observed in the Pd/C and PPh₃ catalyst system due to phenylboronic acid containing electron‐withdrawing F atom(s). For the catalyst system of Pd(OAc)₂/PPh₃, the reactions gave moderate yields of 55% –80%, meanwhile, affording 10% –20% of dimerisation (self‐coupling) by‐products, but trace products were obtained in coupling with 2,4‐difluorophenylboronic acids because of steric hinderance. Pd(PPh₃)₄ was more reactive for boronic acids with sterically hindering F atom(s), and the coupling reactions gave good yields of 90% and 91% without any self‐coupling by‐product.     

Mild Cobalt‐Catalyzed Negishi Cross‐Couplings of (Hetero)arylzinc Reagents with (Hetero)aryl Halides

A catalytic system consisting of CoCl₂ ? 2 LiCl (5 mol %) and HCO₂Na (50 mol %) enables the cross‐coupling of various N‐heterocyclic chlorides and bromides as well as aromatic halogenated ketones with various electron‐rich and ‐poor arylzinc reagents. The reactions reached full conversion within a few hours at 25 °C.     

A Highly Versatile Catalyst System for the Cross‐Coupling of Aryl Chlorides and Amines

The syntheses of 2‐(di‐tert‐butylphosphino)‐N,N‐dimethylaniline ( L1 , 71 %) and 2‐(di‐1‐adamantylphosphino)‐N,N‐dimethylaniline ( L2 , 74 %), and their application in Buchwald–Hartwig amination, are reported. In combination with [Pd(allyl)Cl]₂ or [Pd(cinnamyl)Cl]₂, these structurally simple and air‐stable P,N ligands enable the cross‐coupling of aryl and heteroaryl chlorides, including those bearing as substituents enolizable ketones, ethers, esters, carboxylic acids, phenols, alcohols, olefins, amides, and halogens, to a diverse range of amine and related substrates that includes primary alkyl‐ and arylamines, cyclic and acyclic secondary amines, N? H imines, hydrazones, lithium amide, and ammonia. In many cases, the reactions can be performed at low catalyst loadings (0.5–0.02 mol % Pd) with excellent functional group tolerance and chemoselectivity. Examples of cross‐coupling reactions involving 1,4‐bromochlorobenzene and iodobenzene are also reported. Under similar conditions, inferior catalytic performance was achieved when using Pd(OAc)₂, PdCl₂, [PdCl₂(cod)] (cod=1,5‐cyclooctadiene), [PdCl₂(MeCN)₂], or [Pd₂(dba)₃] (dba=dibenzylideneacetone) in combination with L1 or L2 , or by use of [Pd(allyl)Cl]₂ or [Pd(cinnamyl)Cl]₂ with variants of L1 and L2 bearing less basic or less sterically demanding substituents on phosphorus or lacking an ortho‐dimethylamino fragment. Given current limitations associated with established ligand classes with regard to maintaining high activity across the diverse possible range of C? N coupling applications, L1 and L2 represent unusually versatile ligand systems for the cross‐coupling of aryl chlorides and amines.     

Solid‐Phase Synthesis of Oligo(triacetylene)s and Oligo(phenylenetriacetylene)s Employing Sonogashira and Cadiot?Chodkiewicz‐Type Cross‐Coupling Reactions

We describe the first polymer‐supported synthesis of poly(triacetylene)‐derived monodisperse oligomers, utilizing Pd⁰‐catalyzed Sonogashira and Cadiot? Chodkiewicz‐type cross‐couplings as the key steps in the construction of the acetylenic scaffolds. For our investigations, Merrifield resin functionalized with a 1‐(4‐iodoaryl)triazene linker was chosen as the polymeric support ( R2 ; Figure and Scheme 3). The linker selection was made based on the results of several model studies in the liquid phase (Schemes 1 and 2). For the solid‐support synthesis of the oligo(phenylene triacetylene)s 7b – 7d , a set of only three reactions was required: i) Pd⁰‐catalyzed Sonogashira cross‐coupling, ii) Me₃Si? alkyne deprotection by protodesilylation, and iii) cleavage of the linker with liberation of the generated oligomers (Scheme 5). The longest‐wavelength absorption maxima of the oligo(phenylene triacetylene)s 7a – 7d shift bathochromically with increasing oligomeric length, from λ_max 337 nm (monomer 7a ) to 384 nm (tetramer 7d ; Table 2). Based on the electronic absorption data, the effective conjugation length (ECL) of the oligo(phenylene triacetylene)s is estimated to involve at least four monomer units and 40 C‐atoms. π‐Electron conjugation in these oligomers is less efficient than in the known oligo(triacetylene)s 14a – 14d (Table 2) due to poor transmittance of π‐electron delocalization by the phenyl rings inserted into the oligomeric backbone. Similar conclusions were drawn from the electrochemical properties of the two oligomeric series as determined by cyclic (CV) and rotating‐disk voltammetry (RDV; Table 3). In sharp contrast to 14b – 14d , the oligo(phenylene triacetylene)s 7b – 7d are strongly fluorescent, with the highest quantum yield Φ_F=0.69 measured for trimer 7c (Table 2). Whereas the Sonogashira cross‐coupling on solid support proceeded smoothly, optimal conditions for alkyne? alkyne cross‐coupling reactions employing Pd⁰‐catalyzed Cadiot? Chodkiewicz conditions still remain to be developed, despite extensive experimentation (Scheme 7 and Table 1).     

2,5‐Bis(2‐(diphenylphosphino)phenyl)‐1,3,4‐oxadiazole ligands and their Cu(I) complexes for Sonogashira coupling reaction

Two diphosphane ligands – 2,5‐bis(2‐(diphenylphosphino)‐5‐R)phenyl)‐1,3,4‐oxadiazole ( L1 , R = H, L2 , R = OMe) and their binuclear complexes, L1Cu and L2Cu , were prepared and characterized. The molecular structures of L1Cu and L2Cu , as perchlorate salts, were established by X‐ray crystallography, which showed them to be binuclear complexes with each Cu atom tetrahedrally coordinated by two P atoms and two N atoms. The ligands and their Cu(I) complexes catalyzed Sonogashira coupling reactions of iodobenzene with phenylacetylene in the presence of K₂CO₃ under Pd‐free conditions. Coupling reactions catalyzed by L1 or L2 with Cu(MeCN)₄ClO₄ in situ exhibited better yields than those by the corresponding Cu(I) complexes L1Cu or L2Cu . Detailed studies showed L1 or L2 with Cu(MeCN)₄ClO₄ to be suitable catalysts for the coupling reaction of terminal alkynes and aryl halides. The coupling reactions of aryl iodides with electron‐withdrawing groups showed better results. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Electrophilic Arene Hydroxylation and Phenol O?H Oxidations Performed by an Unsymmetric μ‐η1:η1‐O2‐Peroxo Dicopper(II) Complex

Reactions of the unsymmetric dicopper(II) peroxide complex [Cu^II₂(μ‐η¹:η¹‐O₂)(m‐XYL^N3N4)]²⁺ ( 1 O₂ , where m‐XYL is a heptadentate N‐based ligand), with phenolates and phenols are described. Complex 1 O₂ reacts with p‐X‐PhONa (X=MeO, Cl, H, or Me) at ?90 °C performing tyrosinase‐like ortho‐hydroxylation of the aromatic ring to afford the corresponding catechol products. Mechanistic studies demonstrate that reactions occur through initial reversible formation of metastable association complexes [Cu^II₂(μ‐η¹:η¹‐O₂)(p‐X‐PhO)(m‐XYL^N3N4)]⁺ ( 1 O₂ ?X‐PhO) that then undergo ortho‐hydroxylation of the aromatic ring by the peroxide moiety. Complex 1 O₂ also reacts with 4‐X‐substituted phenols p‐X‐PhOH (X=MeO, Me, F, H, or Cl) and with 2,4‐di‐tert‐butylphenol at ?90 °C causing rapid decay of 1 O₂ and affording biphenol coupling products, which is indicative that reactions occur through formation of phenoxyl radicals that then undergo radical C? C coupling. Spectroscopic UV/Vis monitoring and kinetic analysis show that reactions take place through reversible formation of ground‐state association complexes [Cu^II₂(μ‐η¹:η¹‐O₂)(X‐PhOH)(m‐XYL^N3N4)]²⁺ ( 1 O₂ ?X‐PhOH) that then evolve through an irreversible rate‐determining step. Mechanistic studies indicate that 1 O₂ reacts with phenols through initial phenol binding to the Cu₂O₂ core, followed by a proton‐coupled electron transfer (PCET) at the rate‐determining step. Results disclosed in this work provide experimental evidence that the unsymmetric 1 O₂ complex can mediate electrophilic arene hydroxylation and PCET reactions commonly associated with electrophilic Cu₂O₂ cores, and strongly suggest that the ability to form substrate?Cu₂O₂ association complexes may provide paths to overcome the inherent reactivity of the O₂‐binding mode. This work provides experimental evidence that the presence of a H⁺ completely determines the fate of the association complex [Cu^II₂(μ‐η¹:η¹‐O₂)(X‐PhO(H))(m‐XYL^N3N4)]ⁿ⁺ between a PCET and an arene hydroxylation reaction, and may provide clues to help understand enzymatic reactions at dicopper sites.     

Organozinc Pivalate Reagents: Segregation,Solubility, Stabilization,and Structural Insights

The pivalates RZnOPiv?Mg(OPiv)X?n LiCl (OPiv=pivalate; R=aryl; X=Cl, Br, I) stand out amongst salt‐supported organometallic reagents, because apart from their effectiveness in Negishi cross‐coupling reactions, they show more resistance to attack by moist air than conventional organometallic compounds. Herein a combination of synthesis, coupling applications, X‐ray crystallographic studies, NMR (including DOSY) studies, and ESI mass spectrometric studies provide details of these pivalate reagents in their own right. A p‐tolyl case system shows that in [D₈]THF solution these reagents exist as separated Me(p‐C₆H₄)ZnCl and Mg(OPiv)₂ species. Air exposure tests and X‐ray crystallographic studies indicate that Mg(OPiv)₂ enhances the air stability of aryl zinc species by sequestering H₂O contaminants. Coupling reactions of Me(p‐C₆H₄)ZnX (where X=different salts) with 4‐bromoanisole highlight the importance of the presence of Mg(OPiv)₂. Insight into the role of LiCl in these multicomponent mixtures is provided by the molecular structure of [(THF)₂Li₂(Cl)₂(OPiv)₂Zn].     

Copper(I)-anilide complex [Na(phen)3][Cu(NPh2)2]: an intermediate in the copper-catalyzed N-arylation of N-phenylaniline

Complex [Na(phen)₃][Cu(NPh₂)₂] ( 2 ), containing a linear bis(N‐phenylanilide)copper(I) anion and a distorted octahedral tris(1,10‐phenanthroline)sodium counter cation, has been isolated from the catalytic C? N cross‐coupling reaction with the CuI/phen/tBuONa (phen=1,10‐phenanthroline) catalytic system. Complex 2 can react with 4‐iodotoluene to produce 4‐methyl‐N,N‐diphenylaniline ( 3 a ) with 70.6 % yield. In addition, 2 can work as an effective catalyst for C? N coupling under the same reaction conditions, thus indicating that 2 is the intermediate of the catalytic system. Both [Cu(NPh₂)₂]^? and [Cu(NPh₂)I]^? have been observed by in situ electron ionization mass spectrometry (ESI‐MS) under catalytic reaction conditions, thus confirming that they are intermediates in the reaction. A catalytic cycle has been proposed based on these observations. The molecular structure of 2 has been determined by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction analysis.     

Role of electronic structure of ruthenium polypyridyl dyes in the photoconversion efficiency of dye‐sensitized solar cells: Semiempirical investigation

ZINDO/S calculations on cis‐Ru(4,4′‐dicarboxy‐2,2′‐bipyridine)₂(X)₂ and cis‐Ru(5,5′‐dicarboxy‐2,2′‐bipyridine)₂(X)₂ complexes where X = Cl^?, CN^?, and NCS^? reveal that the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) of these complexes has a large amplitude on both the nonchromophoric ligand X and the central ruthenium atom. The lowest‐energy metal to ligand charge transfer (MLCT) transition in these complexes involves electron transfer from ruthenium as well as the halide/pseudohalide ligand to the polypyridyl ligand. The contribution of the halide/pseudohalide ligand(X) to the HOMO affects the total amount of charge transferred to the polypyridyl ligand and hence the photoconversion efficiency. The virtual orbitals involved in the second MLCT transition in 4,4′‐dicarboxy‐2,2′‐bipyridine complexes have higher electron density on the ? COOH group compared to the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital and hence a stronger electronic coupling with the TiO₂ surface and higher injection efficiency at shorter wavelengths. In comparison, the virtual orbitals involved in the second MLCT transition in 5,5′‐dicarboxy‐2,2′‐bipyridine complexes have lesser electron density on the ? COOH group, leading to a weaker electronic coupling with the TiO₂ surface and therefore lower efficiency for electron injection at shorter wavelengths for these complexes. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Quantum Chem, 2002     

Cu?Cu2O?TiO2 Nanojunction Systems with an Unusual Electron–Hole Transportation Pathway and Enhanced Photocatalytic Properties

Multicomponent Cu? Cu₂O? TiO₂ nanojunction systems were successfully synthesized by a mild chemical process, and their structure and composition were thoroughly analyzed by X‐ray diffraction, transmission electron microscopy, field‐emission scanning electron microscopy, and X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy. The as‐prepared Cu? Cu₂O? TiO₂ (3 and 9 h) nanojunctions demonstrated higher photocatalytic activities under UV/Vis light irradiation in the process of the degradation of organic compounds than those of the Cu? Cu₂O, Cu? TiO₂, and Cu₂O? TiO₂ starting materials. Moreover, time‐resolved photoluminescence spectra demonstrated that the quenching times of electrons and holes in Cu? Cu₂O? TiO₂ (3 h) is higher than that of Cu? Cu₂O? TiO₂ (9 h); this leads to a better photocatalytic performance of Cu? Cu₂O? TiO₂ (3 h). The improvement in photodegradation activity and electron–hole separation of Cu? Cu₂O? TiO₂ (3 h) can be ascribed to the rational coupling of components and dimensional control. Meanwhile, an unusual electron–hole transmission pathway for photocatalytic reactions over Cu? Cu₂O? TiO₂ nanojunctions was also identified.     

Chemie freier cyclischer vicinaler Tricarbonyl‐Verbindungen (‘1,2,3‐Trione’). Teil 3

Chemistry of Free Cyclic Vicinal Tricarbonyl Compounds (‘1,2,3‐Triones’). Part 3. Polar and Redox Reactions of 1,2,3‐Triones with Enamines of Different Types – News on Oxonol Dyes, Radicals, and Biradicals The central C?O groups of cyclic 1,2,3‐triones possess outstanding electrophilic (electron‐pair‐accepting) as well as oxidizing (one‐electron‐accepting) properties. Thus, 1,2,3‐triones are chemically related to 1,2‐ and 1,4‐benzoquinones. Whereas polar reactions with carbanion‐like (electron rich) species give rise to nucleophilic addition reactions to C?O groups under exclusive C,C‐bond formation, SET (single‐electron transfer) or redox reactions effect a partial ‘carbonyl Umpolung’ via ketyl intermediates (C,C‐ and/or C,O‐bond formation). Here, we report on numerous reactions between electron‐rich, more‐ or less‐polar enamines with 5,5‐dimethylcyclohexane‐1,2,3‐trione ( 9a ) and 1H‐indene‐1,2,3‐trione ( 9b ). Various new derivatives of basic oxonol dyes were formed, including the first oxonol dye incorporating a 1,3‐dioxocyclohexyl moiety. A novel stable radical, 50 / 50′ , was obtained from 9b and 11a via addition, hydrolysis, and treatment with conc. H₂SO₄. Radical 50 / 50′ represents a vinylogous ‘monodehydroreductone’ and is, thus, related to monodehydroascorbic acid ( 143 ), to Russell's radical cation ( 144 ), to indigo ( 141 / 141′ ), and to quinhydrone.     

Cobalt‐Catalyzed Oxidative C−H/C−H Cross‐Coupling between Two Heteroarenes

The first example of cobalt‐catalyzed oxidative C?H/C?H cross‐coupling between two heteroarenes is reported, which exhibits a broad substrate scope and a high tolerance level for sensitive functional groups. When the amount of Co(OAc)₂?4 H₂O is reduced from 6.0 to 0.5 mol %, an excellent yield is still obtained at an elevated temperature with a prolonged reaction time. The method can be extended to the reaction between an arene and a heteroarene. It is worth noting that the Ag₂CO₃ oxidant is renewable. Preliminary mechanistic studies by radical trapping experiments, hydrogen/deuterium exchange experiments, kinetic isotope effect, electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR), and high resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) suggest that a single electron transfer (SET) pathway is operative, which is distinctly different from the dual C?H bond activation pathway that the well‐described oxidative C?H/C?H cross‐coupling reactions between two heteroarenes typically undergo.     

Pseudotetrahedral Rhodium(I) Complexes

A combination of four‐electron donors, such as alkynes, with strongly donating and strong‐field scorpionate ligands is appropriate to create pseudotetrahedral rhodium(I) environments, as found in [Rh(PhBP₃)(HC?CPh)], which promotes H?C bond activation and C?C coupling reactions under very smooth conditions.     

meso–meso‐Linked Diarylamine‐Fused Porphyrin Dimers

A meso–meso‐linked diphenylamine‐fused porphyrin dimer and its methoxy‐substituted analogue were synthesized from a meso–meso‐linked porphyrin dimer by a reaction sequence involving Ir‐catalyzed β‐selective borylation, iodination, meso‐chlorination, and S_NAr reactions with diarylamines followed by electron‐transfer‐mediated intramolecular double C?H/C?I coupling. While these dimers commonly display characteristic split Soret bands and small oxidation potentials, they produced different products upon oxidation with tris(4‐bromophenyl)aminium hexachloroantimonate. Namely, the diphenylamine‐fused porphyrin dimer was converted into a dicationic closed‐shell quinonoidal dimer, while the methoxy‐substituted dimer gave a meso–meso, β‐β doubly linked porphyrin dimer.