Oligonucleotide Analogues with Integrated Bases and Backbones. Part 26

The self‐complementary aminomethylene‐linked A*[n] U* dinucleosides 23 – 26 were prepared by reductive coupling of aldehyde 10 and azide 8 . The U*[n] A* sequence isomers 19 – 21 were similarly prepared from aldehyde 14 and azide 3 . The substituents at C(6/I) of 23 – 26 and at C(8/I) of 19 – 21 strongly favour the syn‐conformation. The A*[n] U* dinucleoside 23 associates more strongly than the sequence‐isomeric U*[n] A* dinucleoside 19 . The A*[n] U* dinucleosides 23 and 24 associate more strongly than the analogues devoid of the substituent at C(6/I), while the U*[n] A* dinucleoside 19 associates less strongly than the analogue devoid of the substituent at C(8/I). While 23 and 24 form cyclic duplexes mostly by Watson–Crick‐type base pairing, 25 only forms linear associates. The U*[n] A* dinucleoside 19 forms mostly linear duplexes and higher associates, and 21 forms cyclic duplexes showing both Watson–Crick‐ and Hoogsteen‐type base pairing. The cyclic duplexes of the aminomethylene‐linked dinucleosides show both the gg‐ and gt‐orientation of the linker, with the gg‐orientation being preferred.     

Oligonucleotide Analogues with Integrated Bases and Backbone. Part 17

The formation of cyclic duplexes (pairing) of known oxymethylene‐linked self‐complementary U*[o]A⁽*⁾ dinucleosides contrasts with the absence of pairing of the ethylene‐linked U*[c_a]A⁽*⁾ analogues. The origin of this difference, and the expected association of U*[x]A⁽*⁾ and A*[x]U⁽*⁾ dinucleosides with x=CH₂, O, or S was analysed. According to this analysis, pairing occurs via constitutionally isomeric Watson–Crick, reverse Watson–Crick, Hoogsteen, or reverse Hoogsteen H‐bonded linear duplexes. Each one of them may give rise to three diastereoisomeric cyclic duplexes, and each one of them can adopt three main conformations. The relative stability of all conformers with x=CH₂, O, or S were analysed. U*[x]A⁽*⁾ dinucleosides with x=CH₂ do not form stable cyclic duplexes, dinucleosides with x=O may form cyclic duplexes with a gg‐conformation about the C(4′)? C(5′) bond, and dinucleosides with x=S may form cyclic duplexes with a gt‐conformation about this bond. The temperature dependence of the chemical shift of H? N(3) of the self‐complementary, oxymethylene‐linked U*[o]A⁽*⁾ dinucleosides 1 – 6 in CDCl₃ in the concentration range of 0.4–50 mM evidences equilibria between the monoplex, mainly linear duplexes, and higher associates for 3 , between the monoplex and cyclic duplexes for 6 , and between the monoplex, linear, and cyclic duplexes as well as higher associates for 1, 2, 4 , and 5 . The self‐complementary, thiomethylene‐linked U*[s]A⁽*⁾ dinucleosides 27 – 32 and the sequence isomeric A*[s]U⁽*⁾ analogues 33 – 38 were prepared by S‐alkylation of the 6‐(mesyloxymethyl)uridine 12 and the 8‐(bromomethyl)adenosine 22 . The required thiolates were prepared in situ from the C(5′)‐acetylthio derivatives 9, 15, 19 , and 25 . The association in CHCl₃ of the thiomethylene‐linked dinucleoside analogues was studied by ¹H‐NMR and CD spectroscopy, and by vapour‐pressure osmometric determination of the apparent molecular mass. The U*[s]A⁽*⁾ alcohols 28, 30 , and 31 form cyclic duplexes connected by Watson–Crick H‐bonds, while the fully protected dimers 27 and 29 form mainly linear duplexes and higher associates. The diol 32 forms mainly cyclic duplexes in solution and corrugated ribbons in the solid state. The nucleobases of crystalline 32 form reverse Hoogsteen H‐bonds, and the resulting ribbons are cross‐linked by H‐bonds between HOCH₂? C(8/I) and N(3/I). Among the A*[s]U⁽*⁾ dimers, only the C(8/I)‐hydroxymethylated 37 forms (mainly) a cyclic duplex, characterized by reverse Hoogsteen base pairing. The dimers 34 – 36 form mainly linear duplexes and higher associates. Dimers 34 and particularly 38 gelate CHCl₃. Temperature‐dependent CD spectra of 28, 30, 31 , and 37 evidence π‐stacking in the cyclic duplexes. Base stacking in the particularly strongly associating diol 32 in CHCl₃ solution is evidenced by a melting temperature of ca. 2°.     

Oligonucleotide Analogues with Integrated Bases and Backbones. Part 24

Inspection of Maruzen models and force‐field calculations suggest that oligonucleotide analogues integrating backbone and bases (ONIBs) with an aminomethylene linker form similar cyclic duplexes as the analogous oxymethylene linked dinucleosides. The self‐complementary adenosine‐ and uridine‐derived aminomethylene‐linked A*[n ]U dinucleosides 15 – 17 were prepared by an aza‐Wittig reaction of the aldehyde 10 with an iminophosphorane derived from azide 6 . The sequence‐isomeric U*[n ]A dinucleosides 18 – 20 were similarly prepared from aldehyde 3 and azide 12 . The N‐ethylamine 5 , the acetamides 7 and 14 , and the amine 13 were prepared as references for the conformational analysis of the dinucleosides. In contradistinction to the results of calculations, the N‐ethylamine 5 exists as intramolecularly H‐bonded hydroxyimino tautomer. The association in CDCl₃ of these dinucleosides was studied by ¹H‐NMR and CD spectroscopy. The A*[n ]U dinucleosides 16 and 17 associate more strongly than the sequence isomers 19 and 20 ; the cyclic duplexes of 16 form preferentially Watson–Crick‐type base pairs, while 17, 19 , and 20 show both Watson–Crick‐ and Hoogsteen‐type base pairing. The cyclic duplexes of the aminomethylene‐linked dinucleosides prefer a gg‐orientation of the linker. No evidence was found for an intramolecular H‐bond of the aminomethylene group. The CD spectra of 16 and 17 show a strong, those of 19 a weak, and those of 20 almost no temperature dependence.     

Oligonucleotide Analogues with Integrated Bases and Backbone. Part 32

The G[s ]G dinucleoside 6 and the G[s ]G* dinucleoside 8 were prepared by alkylation of the guanosine thiols derived from 2 and 5 , respectively, by the C(8)‐chloromethylated guanosine 4 that was obtained from alcohol 3 . Dinucleosides 6 and 8 were deacylated to 7 and 9 , and fully deprotected to 10 and 11 , respectively. The G[n ]G dinucleoside 16 was obtained by reductive amination of aldehyde 13 with an iminophosphorane derived from azide 14 and deprotection of the resulting dimer 15 . In the solid state of 6 , and in a solution of 6 and 8 in CDCl₃, H? N(1/I) and H? N(1/II) are engaged in intramolecular H‐bonds to the C?O of the isobutyryl protecting groups, and HN of the isobutyryl group of unit I forms an interresidue, intramolecular H‐bond to N(7/II), leading to a syn orientation of the nucleobase at unit I, to a tg orientation of the sulfanyl moiety, and to an orthogonal orientation of the nucleobases, preventing any base pairing. The silylated and isopropylidenated dinucleosides 7 and 9 are present in DMSO solution as solvated monoplexes. Broad ¹H‐NMR signals of the nucleosides 7 and 16 in CHCl₃ solution evidence equilibrating G‐quadruplexes. The quadruplex formation of 7 and 16 was established by ¹H‐NMR spectroscopy (only of 16 ), vapour pressure osmometry, mass spectrometry, and CD spectroscopy. The C(6(I))‐hydroxymethylated analogue 9 in CDCl₃ and the fully deprotected dinucleosides 10 and 11 in H₂O form only weakly π? π stacked associates, but no G‐quadruplexes, as evidenced by CD spectroscopy.     

Oligonucleotide Analogues with Integrated Bases and Backbone. Part 22

The tritylated and silylated self‐complementary A*[s]U*[s]A*[s]U* and U*[s]A*[s]U*[s]A* tetramers 18 and 24 , linked by thiomethylene groups (abbreviated as [s]) between a nucleobase and C(5′) of the neighbouring nucleoside unit were prepared by a linear synthesis based on S‐alkylation of 5′‐thionucleosides by 6‐(chloromethyl)uridines, 7 or 10 , or 8‐(chloromethyl)adenosines, 12 or 15 . The tetramers 18 and 24 were detritylated to the monoalcohols 19 and 25 , and these were desilylated to the diols 20 and 26 , respectively. The association of the tetramers 18 – 21 and 24 – 26 in CDCl₃ or in CDCl₃/(D₆)DMSO 95 : 5 was investigated by the concentration dependence of the chemical shifts for H? N(3) or H₂N? C(6). The formation of cyclic duplexes connected by four base pairs is favoured by the presence of one and especially of two OH groups. The diol 20 with the AUAU sequence prefers reverse‐Hoogsteen, and diol 26 with the UAUA sequence Watson–Crick base pairing. The structure of the cyclic duplex of 26 in CDCl₃ at 2° was derived by a combination of AMBER* modeling and simulated annealing with NMR‐derived distance and torsion‐angle restraints resulting in a Watson–Crick base‐paired right‐handed antiparallel helix showing large roll angles, especially between the centre base pairs, leading to a bent helix axis.     

Oligonucleotide Analogues with Integrated Bases and Backbone. Part 30

The protected G*[s ]C*[s ]U*[s ]A*[s ]U*[s ]A*[s ]G*[s ]C* octanucleoside 24 was prepared by S‐alkylation of the thiolate derived from tetranucleoside 23 with the methanesulfonate 22 , and transformed to the silylated and isopropylidenated 25 , and further into the fully deprotected octanucleoside 26 . Compound 22 was derived from the methoxytrityl‐protected tetranucleoside 21 , and 21 was obtained by S‐alkylation of the thiolate derived from the dinucleoside 19 with methanesulfonate 17 derived from 16 by detritylation and mesylation. Similarly, tetranucleoside 23 resulted from S‐alkylation of the thiolate derived from 18 with the methanesulfonate 20 derived from 19 . Dinucleosides 16 and 18 resulted from S‐alkylation of the thiolate derived from the known cytidine‐derived thioacetate 15 with the C(8)‐substituted guanosine‐derived methanesulfonates 12 and 14 , respectively, that were synthesized from the protected precursors 4 and 7 by formylation, reduction, protection, and mesylation. The structures of the duplexes of 25 and 26 were calculated using AMBER* modelling and based on the known structure of the core tetranucleoside U*[s ]A*[s ]U*[s ]A*. The former shows a helix with a bent helix axis and strong buckle and propeller twists, whereas the latter is a regular, right‐handed, and apparently strain‐free helix. In agreement with modelling, the silylated and isopropylidenated octanucleoside 25 in (CDCl₂)₂ solution led to a mixture of associated species possessing at most four Watson? Crick base pairs, while the fully deprotected octanucleoside 26 in aqueous medium forms a duplex, as evidenced by a decreasing CD absorption upon increasing the temperature and by a UV‐melting curve with a melting temperature of ca. 10° below the one of the corresponding RNA octamer, indicating cooperativity between base pairing and base‐pair stacking.     

Syntheses and structures of three macrocyclic supramolecular complexes and one ZnII‐containing coordination polymer generated from a semi‐rigid multidentate N‐containing ligand

Semirigid organic ligands can adopt different conformations to construct coordination polymers with more diverse structures when compared to those constructed from rigid ligands. A new asymmetric semirigid organic ligand, 4‐{2‐[(pyridin‐3‐yl)methyl]‐2H‐tetrazol‐5‐yl}pyridine ( L ), has been prepared and used to synthesize three bimetallic macrocyclic complexes and one coordination polymer, namely, bis(μ‐4‐{2‐[(pyridin‐3‐yl)methyl]‐2H‐tetrazol‐5‐yl}pyridine)bis[dichloridozinc(II)] dichloromethane disolvate, [Zn₂Cl₄(C₁₂H₁₀N₆)₂]·2CH₂Cl₂, ( I ), the analogous chloroform monosolvate, [Zn₂Cl₄(C₁₂H₁₀N₆)₂]·CHCl₃, ( II ), bis(μ‐4‐{2‐[(pyridin‐3‐yl)methyl]‐2H‐tetrazol‐5‐yl}pyridine)bis[diiodidozinc(II)] dichloromethane disolvate, [Zn₂I₄(C₁₂H₁₀N₆)₂]·2CH₂Cl₂, ( III ), and catena‐poly[[[diiodidozinc(II)]‐μ‐4‐{2‐[(pyridin‐3‐yl)methyl]‐2H‐tetrazol‐5‐yl}pyridine] chloroform monosolvate], {[ZnI₂(C₁₂H₁₀N₆)]·CHCl₃}_n, ( IV ), by solution reaction with ZnX₂ (X = Cl and I) in a CH₂Cl₂/CH₃OH or CHCl₃/CH₃OH mixed solvent system at room temperature. Complex ( I ) is isomorphic with complex ( III ) and has a bimetallic ring possessing similar coordination environments for both of the Zn^II cations. Although complex ( II ) also contains a bimetallic ring, the two Zn^II cations have different coordination environments. Under the influence of the I^? anion and guest CHCl₃ molecule, complex ( IV ) displays a significantly different structure with respect to complexes ( I )–( III ). C—H…Cl and C—H…N hydrogen bonds, and π–π stacking or C—Cl…π interactions exist in complexes ( I )–( IV ), and these weak interactions play an important role in the three‐dimensional structures of ( I )–( IV ) in the solid state. In addition, the fluorescence properties of L and complexes ( I )–( IV ) were investigated.     

Oligonucleotide Analogues with Integrated Bases and Backbone. Part 15

The self‐complementary (Z)‐configured U*[c_e]A⁽*⁾ dinucleotide analogues 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 , and 16 , and the A*[c_e]U⁽*⁾ dimers 19, 21, 23, 25, 27 , and 29 were prepared by partial hydrogenation of the corresponding ethynylene linked dimers. Photolysis of 14 led to the (E)‐alkene 17 . These dinucleotide analogues associate in CDCl₃ solution, as evidenced by NMR and CD spectroscopy. The thermodynamic parameters of the duplexation were determined by van't Hoff analysis. The (Z)‐configured U*[c_e]A⁽*⁾ dimers 14 and 16 form cyclic duplexes connected by Watson–Crick H‐bonds, the (E)‐configured U*[c_e]A dimer 17 forms linear duplexes, and the U*[c_e]A⁽*⁾ allyl alcohols 6, 8, 10 , and 12 form mixtures of linear and cyclic duplexes. The C(6/I)‐unsubstituted A*[c_e]U allyl alcohols 19 and 23 form linear duplexes, whereas the C(6/I)‐substituted A*[c_e]U* allyl alcohols 21 and 25 , and the C(5′/I)‐deoxy A*[c_e]U⁽*⁾ dimers 27 and 29 also form minor amounts of cyclic duplexes. The influence of intra‐ and intermolecular H‐bonding of the allyl alcohols and the influence of the base sequence upon the formation of cyclic duplexes are discussed.     

Oligonucleotide Analogues with Integrated Bases and Backbone

The thiomethylene‐linked U*[s]U⁽*⁾ dimers 9 – 14 were synthesized by substitution of the 6‐[(mesyloxy)methyl]uridine 6 by the thiolate derived from the uridine‐5′‐thioacetates 7 and 8 followed by O‐deprotection. Similarly, the thiomethylene‐linked A*[s]A⁽*⁾ dimers 9 – 14 were obtained from the 8‐(bromomethyl)adenosine 15 and the adenosine‐5′‐thioacetates 16 and 17 . The concentration dependence of both H? N(3) of the U*[s]U⁽*⁾ dimers 9 – 14 evidences the formation of linear and cyclic duplexes, and of linear higher associates, C(8 or 6)CH₂OH and/or C(5′/II)OH groups favouring the formation of cyclic duplexes. The concentration dependence of the chemical shift for both H₂N? C(6) of the A*[s]A⁽*⁾ dimers 18 – 23 evidences the formation of mainly linear associates. The heteroassociation of U*[s]U⁽*⁾ to A*[s]A⁽*⁾ dimers is stronger than the homoassociation of U*[s]U⁽*⁾ dimers, as evidenced by diluting equimolar mixtures of 11 / 20 and 13 / 22 . A 1 : 1 stoichiometry of the heteroassociation is evidenced by a Job's plot for 11 / 20 , and by mole ratio plots for 9 / 18, 10 / 19, 12 / 21, 13 / 22 , and 14 / 23 .     

1H NMR spectra part 31: 1H chemical shifts of amides in DMSO solvent

The ¹H chemical shifts of 48 amides in DMSO solvent are assigned and presented. The solvent shifts Δδ (DMSO‐CDCl₃) are large (1–2 ppm) for the NH protons but smaller and negative (?0.1 to ?0.2 ppm) for close range protons. A selection of the observed solvent shifts is compared with calculated shifts from the present model and from GIAO calculations. Those for the NH protons agree with both calculations, but other solvent shifts such as Δδ(CHO) are not well reproduced by the GIAO calculations. The ¹H chemical shifts of the amides in DMSO were analysed using a functional approach for near ( ≤ 3 bonds removed) protons and the electric field, magnetic anisotropy and steric effect of the amide group for more distant protons. The chemical shifts of the NH protons of acetanilide and benzamide vary linearly with the π density on the αN and βC atoms, respectively. The C=O anisotropy and steric effect are in general little changed from the values in CDCl₃. The effects of substituents F, Cl, Me on the NH proton shifts are reproduced. The electric field coefficient for the protons in DMSO is 90% of that in CDCl₃. There is no steric effect of the C=O oxygen on the NH proton in an NH…O=C hydrogen bond. The observed deshielding is due to the electric field effect. The calculated chemical shifts agree well with the observed shifts (RMS error of 0.106 ppm for the data set of 257 entries). Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Oligonucleotide Analogues with Integrated Bases and Backbone. Part 16

The self‐complementary, ethylene‐linked U*[c_a]A⁽*⁾ dinucleotide analogues 8, 10, 12, 14, 16 , and 18 , and the sequence‐isomeric A*[c_a]U⁽*⁾ analogues 20, 22, 24, 26, 28 , and 30 were obtained by Pd/C‐catalyzed hydrogenation of the corresponding, known ethynylene‐linked dimers. The association of the ethylene‐linked dimers was investigated by NMR and CD spectroscopy. The U*[c_a]A⁽*⁾ dimers form linear duplexes and higher associates (K between 29 and 114M ^?1). The A*[c_a]U⁽*⁾ dimers, while associating more strongly (K between 88 and 345M ^?1), lead mostly to linear duplexes and higher associates; they form only minor amounts of cyclic duplexes. The enthalpy–entropy compensation characterizing the association of the U*[c_x]A⁽*⁾ and A*[c_x]U⁽*⁾ dimers (x=y, e, and a) is discussed.     

Two Heteroleptic Zinc(II) Complexes: [Zn(phen)(C9H15O6)2] and [Zn2(phen)2(H2O)2(C10H16O4)2] · 3H2O

Reactions of a freshly prepared Zn(OH)_2‐2x(CO₃)x · yH₂O precipitate, phenanthroline with azelaic and sebacic acid in CH₃OH/H₂O afforded [Zn(phen)(C₉H₁₅O₄)₂] ( 1 ) and [Zn₂(phen)₂(H₂O)₂(C₁₀H₁₆O₄)₂] · 3H₂O ( 2 ), respectively. They were structurally characterized by X‐ray diffraction methods. Compound 1 consists of complex molecules [Zn(phen)(C₉H₁₅O₄)₂] in which the Zn atoms are tetrahedrally coordinated by two N atoms of one phen ligand and two O atoms of different monodentate hydrogen azelaato groups. Intermolecular C(alkyl)‐H···π interactions and the intermolecular C(aryl)‐H···O and O‐H···O hydrogen bonds are responsible for the supramolecular assembly of the [Zn(phen)(C₉H₁₅O₄)₂] complexes. Compound 2 is built up from crystal H₂O molecules and the centrosymmetric binuclear [Zn₂(phen)₂(H₂O)₂(C₁₀H₁₆O₄)₂] complex, in which two [Zn(phen)(H₂O)]²⁺ moieties are bridged by two sebacato ligands. Through the intermolecular C(alkyl)‐H···O hydrogen bonds and π‐π stacking interactions, the binuclear complex molecules are assembled into layers, between which the lattice H₂O molecules are sandwiched. Crystal data: ( 1 ) C2/c (no. 15), a = 13.887(2), b = 9.790(2), c = 22.887(3)Å, β = 107.05(1)°, U = 2974.8(8)ų, Z = 4; ( 2 ) P1¯ (no. 2), a = 8.414(1), b = 10.679(1), c = 14.076(2)Å, α = 106.52(1)°, β = 91.56(1)°, γ = 99.09(1)°, U = 1193.9(2)ų, Z = 1.     

Three zinc(II) and cadmium(II) complexes containing 4‐amino‐3,5‐bis(pyridin‐2‐yl)‐1,2,4‐triazole and polynitrile ligands: synthesis,molecular and supramolecular structures,and photoluminescence properties

Three photoluminescent complexes containing either Zn^II or Cd^II have been synthesized and their structures determined. Bis[4‐amino‐3,5‐bis(pyridin‐2‐yl)‐1,2,4‐triazole‐κ²N ¹,N ⁵]bis(dicyanamido‐κN ¹)zinc(II), [Zn(C₁₂H₁₀N₆)₂(C₂N₃)₂], (I), bis[4‐amino‐3,5‐bis(pyridin‐2‐yl)‐1,2,4‐triazole‐κ²N ¹,N ⁵]bis(dicyanamido‐κN ¹)cadmium(II), [Cd(C₁₂H₁₀N₆)₂(C₂N₃)₂], (II), and bis[4‐amino‐3,5‐bis(pyridin‐2‐yl)‐1,2,4‐triazole‐κ²N ¹,N ⁵]bis(tricyanomethanido‐κN ¹)cadmium(II), [Cd(C₁₂H₁₀N₆)₂(C₄N₃)₂], (III), all crystallize in the space group P , with the metal centres lying on centres of inversion, but neither analogues (I) and (II) nor Cd^II complexes (II) and (III) are isomorphous. A combination of N—H…N and C—H…N hydrogen bonds and π–π stacking interactions generates three‐dimensional framework structures in (I) and (II), and a sheet structure in (III). The photoluminescence spectra of (I)–(III) indicate that the energies of the π–π* transitions in the coordinated triazole ligand are modified by minor changes of the ligand geometry associated with coordination to the metal centres.     

Oligonucleotide Analogues with Integrated Bases and Backbone. Part 14

The self‐complementary tetrameric propargyl triols 8, 14, 18 , and 21 were synthesized to investigate the duplex formation of self‐complementary, ethynylene‐linked UUAA, AAUU, UAUA, and AUAU analogues with integrated bases and backbone (ONIBs). The linear synthesis is based on repetitive Sonogashira couplings and C‐desilylations (34–72% yield), starting from the monomeric propargyl alcohols 9 and 15 and the iodinated nucleosides 3, 7, 11 , and 13 . Strongly persistent intramolecular H‐bonds from the propargylic OH groups to N(3) of the adenosine units prevent the gg‐type orientation of the ethynyl groups at C(5′). As such, an orientation is required for the formation of cyclic duplexes, this H‐bond prevents the formation of duplexes connected by all four base pairs. However, the central units of the UAUA and AAUU analogues 18 and 14 associate in CDCl₃/(D₆)DMSO 10 : 1 to form a cyclic duplex characterized by reverse Hoogsteen base pairing. The UUAA tetramer 8 forms a cyclic UU homoduplex, while the AUAU tetramer 21 forms only linear associates. Duplex formation of the O‐silylated UUAA and AAUU tetramers is no longer prevented. The self‐complementary UUAA tetramer 22 forms Watson–Crick‐ and Hoogsteen‐type base‐paired cyclic duplexes more readily than the sequence‐isomeric AAUU tetramer 23 , further illustrating the sequence selectivity of duplex formation.     

Three‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded framework structures in flunarizinium nicotinate and flunarizinediium bis(4‐toluenesulfonate) dihydrate

The structures of two salts of flunarizine, namely 1‐bis[(4‐fluorophenyl)methyl]‐4‐[(2E)‐3‐phenylprop‐2‐en‐1‐yl]piperazine, C₂₆H₂₆F₂N₂, are reported. In flunarizinium nicotinate {systematic name: 4‐bis[(4‐fluorophenyl)methyl]‐1‐[(2E)‐3‐phenylprop‐2‐en‐1‐yl]piperazin‐1‐ium pyridine‐3‐carboxylate}, C₂₆H₂₇F₂N₂⁺·C₆H₄NO₂⁻, (I), the two ionic components are linked by a short charge‐assisted N—H...O hydrogen bond. The ion pairs are linked into a three‐dimensional framework structure by three independent C—H...O hydrogen bonds, augmented by C—H...π(arene) hydrogen bonds and an aromatic π–π stacking interaction. In flunarizinediium bis(4‐toluenesulfonate) dihydrate {systematic name: 1‐[bis(4‐fluorophenyl)methyl]‐4‐[(2E)‐3‐phenylprop‐2‐en‐1‐yl]piperazine‐1,4‐diium bis(4‐methylbenzenesulfonate) dihydrate}, C₂₆H₂₈F₂N₂²⁺·2C₇H₇O₃S⁻·2H₂O, (II), one of the anions is disordered over two sites with occupancies of 0.832 (6) and 0.168 (6). The five independent components are linked into ribbons by two independent N—H...O hydrogen bonds and four independent O—H...O hydrogen bonds, and these ribbons are linked to form a three‐dimensional framework by two independent C—H...O hydrogen bonds, but C—H...π(arene) hydrogen bonds and aromatic π–π stacking interactions are absent from the structure of (II). Comparisons are made with some related structures.     

Synthesis,Structures, and Properties of Two Novel Supramolecular Architectures Constructed from [2,3‐f]Pyrazino[1,10]phenanthroline‐2,3‐dicarboxylic Acid

Two new compounds, [Ag(Hppdb)]_n ( 1 ) and {[Ag₂(Hppdb)₂(bpe)] · 5.5H₂O}_n( 2 ) [H₂ppdb = [2,3‐f]pyrazino[1,10]phenanthroline‐2,3‐dicarboxylic acid, bpe = trans‐1,2‐bis(4‐pyridyl)ethylene], were synthesized and characterized. In 1 , Hppdb^– ions link Ag^I cations to form an infinite 1D [–Ag–(Hppdb)–Ag–]_n chain, furthermore, the dimensionality is extended to 2D layers through synergistic π–π stacking, hydrogen‐bonding and weak Ag ··· O interactions. Correspondingly, the dimeric [(Ag)(Hppdb)]₂ subunits in 2 are connected by bpe ligands to generate a loop‐link‐shaped 1D chain motif, which is further joined through a R₂²(18)C–H ··· O hydrogen‐bonding ring to afford interesting diagonal/diagonal inclined catenation 2D + 2D → 3D supramolecular architectures. In addition, solid‐state properties such as photoluminescence and thermal stability of the two compounds were studied.     

Syntheses and crystal structures of two heterometallic iodoplumbates containing mixed‐valence copper(I/II)

Mixed‐valence copper(I/II) atoms have been introduced successfully into a Pb/I skeleton to obtain two heterometallic iodoplumbates, namely poly[bis(tetra‐n‐butylammonium) [bis(μ₃‐dimethyldithiocarbamato)dodeca‐μ₃‐iodido‐hexa‐μ₂‐iodido‐tetracopper(I)copper(II)hexalead(II)]], {(C₁₆H₃₆N)₂[Cu₄^ICu^IIPb₆(C₃H₆NS₂)₂I₁₈]}_n , (I), and poly[[μ₃‐iodido‐tri‐μ₂‐iodido‐iodido[bis(1,10‐phenanthroline)copper(I)]copper(I)copper(II)lead(II)] hemiiodine], {[Cu^ICu^IIPbI₅(C₁₂H₈N₂)₂]·0.5I₂}_n , (II), under solution and solvothermal conditions, respectively. Compound (I) contains two‐dimensional anionic layers, which are built upon the linkages of Cu^II(S₂CNMe₂)₂ units and one‐dimensional anionic Pb/I/Cu^I chains. Tetra‐n‐butylammonium cations are located between the anionic layers and connected to them via C—H…I hydrogen‐bonding interactions. Compound (II) exhibits a one‐dimensional neutral structure, which is composed of [PbI₅] square pyramids, [Cu^II₄] tetrahedra and [Cu^IIN₄I] trigonal bipyramids. Face‐to‐face aromatic π–π stacking interactions between adjacent 1,10‐phenanthroline ligands stabilize the structure and assemble compound (II) into a three‐dimensional supramolecular structure. I₂ molecules lie in the voids of the structure.     

Synthesis and characterization of diorganotin(IV) complexes of Schiff bases with ONO‐type donors and crystal structure of [N‐(2‐hydroxy‐4‐nitrophenyl)‐3‐ethoxysalicylideneiminato]diphenyltin(IV)

A series of neutral complexes, namely, [N‐(2‐hydroxy‐4‐nitrophenyl)‐3‐hydroxysalicylideneiminato]‐ diphenyltin(IV) ( Ia ), [N‐(2‐hydroxy‐4‐nitrophenyl)‐3‐methoxysalicylideneiminato]diphenyltin(IV) ( IIa ) and [N‐(2‐hydroxy‐4‐nitrophenyl)‐3‐ethoxysalicylideneiminato]diphenyltin(IV) ( IIIa ) were prepared by the reaction of diphenyltin dichloride on the corresponding Schiff bases. The Schiff bases were the reaction products of 2‐hydroxy‐4‐nitroaniline and appropriate salicylaldehydes. All the compounds were characterized by elemental analysis, ¹H‐NMR, ¹³C‐NMR, IR and mass spectroscopy. Compound IIIa was also characterized by single crystal X‐ray diffraction and shows a C₂NO₂ coordination geometry nearly half‐way between a trigonal bipyramidal and square pyramidal arrangement. In the solid state, π? π interactions exist between the aniline fragments of neighbouring molecules. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Supramolecular interactions in carboxylate and sulfonate salts of 2,6‐diamino‐4‐chloropyrimidinium

Two new salts, namely 2,6‐diamino‐4‐chloropyrimidinium 2‐carboxy‐3‐nitrobenzoate, C₄H₆ClN₄⁺·C₈H₄NO₆⁻, (I), and 2,6‐diamino‐4‐chloropyrimidinium p‐toluenesulfonate monohydrate, C₄H₆ClN₄⁺·C₇H₇O₃S⁻·H₂O, (II), have been synthesized and characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. In both crystal structures, the N atom in the 1‐position of the pyrimidine ring is protonated. In salt (I), the protonated N atom and the amino group of the pyrimidinium cation interact with the carboxylate group of the anion through N—H…O hydrogen bonds to form a heterosynthon with an R ₂²(8) ring motif. In hydrated salt (II), the presence of the water molecule prevents the formation of the familiar R ₂²(8) ring motif. Instead, an expanded ring [i.e. R ₃²(8)] is formed involving the sulfonate group, the pyrimidinium cation and the water molecule. Both salts form a supramolecular homosynthon [R ₂²(8) ring motif] through N—H…N hydrogen bonds. The molecular structures are further stabilized by π–π stacking, and C=O…π, C—H…O and C—H…Cl interactions.     

2‐Imino‐3‐allyl‐benzothiazole as a π‐Ligand: Synthesis and Crystal Structure of [(CuCl)C10H10SN2], [C10H11SN2+]2[Cu2Cl4]2−, and [C10H11SN2+]2[Cu2Br4]2− π‐Compounds

The reaction of 2‐amino‐benzothiazole with allyl bromide resulted in a mixture of 2‐imino‐3‐allyl‐benzothiazole and 2‐imino‐3‐allyl‐benzothiazolium bromide.Using such a mixture and copper(II) chloride in acetonitrile solution in alternating‐current electrochemical synthesis crystals of the [(CuCl)C₁₀H₁₀SN₂] ( I ) have been obtained. The same procedure, performed in ethanol solution, has led to formation of [C₁₀H₁₁SN₂⁺]₂[Cu₂Cl₄]^2? ( II ). In the same manner the bromine derivative [C₁₀H₁₁SN₂⁺]₂[Cu₂Br₄]^2? ( III ) has been synthesized. All three compounds were X‐ray structurally investigated. I :monoclinic space group P2₁/n, a = 13.789(6), b = 6.297(3), c = 13.830(6) Å, β = 112.975(4)°, V = 1105.6 (9) ų, Z = 4 for CuCl·C₁₀H₁₀ SN₂ composition. Compounds II and III are isomorphous and crystallize in triclinic space group. II a = 7.377(3), b = 8.506(3), c = 9.998(4) Å, α = 79.892(10)°, β = 82.704(13)°, γ = 78.206(12)°, V = 601.9(4) ų, Z = 1. III a = 7.329(2), b = 8.766(3), c = 10.265(3) Å, α = 79.253(9)°, β = 82.625(9)°, γ = 77.963(9)°, V = 630.9(3) ų, Z = 1. In the structure I [(CuCl)C₁₀H₁₀SN₂] building blocks are bound into infinitive spiral‐like chains via strong N‐H..Cl hydrogen bonds. In the zwitter‐ionic II and III compounds copper and halide atoms form centrosymmetric [Cu₂X₄]^2? anions, which are interconnected via N‐H..X hydrogen bonds into infinite butterfly‐like chains. The strongest Cu‐(C=C) π‐interaction has been observed in structure I , where copper possesses coordination number 3. Increasing copper coordination number to 4 in II as well as replacing chlorine atoms by bromine ones in III suppresses markedly this interaction.