磁性分散固相微萃取/UHPLC-Q-Orbitrap HRMS测定运动营养食品中27种氨基酸

基于磁性分散固相微萃取净化,建立了测定运动营养食品中27种氨基酸含量的超高效液相色谱-四极杆-静电场轨道阱高分辨质谱法。通过优化液相色谱条件、质谱条件和样品前处理过程,在20 min内实现了对27种目标物的测定。样品经涡旋振荡,超声提取,磁性氧化石墨烯分散固相微萃取净化,采用Thermo Accucore HILIC色谱柱分离,以0.1%甲酸水溶液（含5.0 mmol/L甲酸铵）和0.1%甲酸乙腈（含5.0 mmol/L甲酸铵）为流动相进行梯度洗脱,静电场轨道阱高分辨质谱检测,外标法定量。结果表明,27种目标化合物在一定质量浓度范围内线性良好,相关系数（r2）均大于0.99,方法的定量下限为0.10～0.25 mg/kg,平均回收率为70.0%～93.0%,日内相对标准偏差（RSD,n=6）为1.6%～10%,日间RSD(n=5)为1.4%～5.2%。该方法高效灵敏,准确可靠,适用于运动营养食品中27种氨基酸的测定。     

食品包装污染物双酚类化合物的固相萃取技术研究

建立并优化了水样中双酚类化合物的固相萃取(SPE)方法。选择C18反相萃取小柱,以3mL 20%甲醇为淋洗液,6mL甲醇为洗脱液,使用高效液相色谱-荧光检测器进行定量测定。该方法对双酚A(BPA)、双酚B(BPB)、双酚E(BPE)、双酚F(BPF)、双酚A二缩水甘油醚(BADGE)和双酚F二缩水甘油醚(BFDGE)6种双酚类化合物的回收率在95.43%~102.10%之间,相对偏差均低于5%,准确度和精密度良好。另外选取四种类型食品模拟物来验证SPE富集双酚类化合物的效果,结果表明6种双酚类化合物在模拟物中的回收率为75.92%~102.10%,相对标准偏差为1.11%~4.99%,准确度与精密度均良好。     

基于碳纳米管的固相萃取-分散液液微萃取测定水中多种痕量环境雌激素

建立了基于碳纳米管的固相萃取-分散液液微萃取/ 上浮溶剂固化-高效液相色谱/荧光法测定水体中痕量雌激素雌三醇(E3)、 双酚A(BPA)、 17α-乙炔基雌二醇(EE2)及17β-雌二醇(E2)的方法. 利用中心复合实验设计分别对固相萃取和分散液液微萃取条件进行了优化, 通过响应曲面法得到的最佳萃取条件为碳纳米管用量30 mg, 水样体积210 mL, 流速2.0 mL/min, 萃取剂(十二醇)体积50 μL, 分散剂(甲醇)体积0.2 mL以及不添加盐. 在优化的实验条件下, E3, BPA, EE2和E2测定的线性范围分别为0.05~100, 0.05~100, 0.05~50和0.05~50 μg/L, 相关系数为0.9993~0.9999, 检出限分别为48.4, 3.3, 8.1和6.0 ng/L. 对不同加标浓度(0.40和4.00 μg/L)的实验室自来水、 排水沟污水及市售矿泉水3种实际水样进行了分析: E3, BPA, EE2和E2的加标回收率依次为107.5%~120.8%, 92.5%~108.3%, 103.5%~121.0%和102.5%~132.5%, 相对偏差分别为2.47%~13.28%, 1.73%~11.94%, 1.72%~8.36%和3.54%~11.95%, 富集因子平均值分别为461, 1075, 2074和949. 实际水样分析结果表明, 本方法可用于不同基质水样中雌激素的测定. 与其它方法相比, 本方法虽然固相萃取时间长及水样量大, 但检出限低、 富集因子高、 操作简便及费用低, 仍可作为一种可普及的水中痕量雌激素检测方法.     

固相萃取-分散液液微萃取-柱前衍生法测定水样中痕量雌激素

建立了碳纳米管的固相萃取-分散液液微萃取-柱前荧光衍生化(SPE-DLLME-PFD)测定水体中痕量雌三醇(E3)、双酚A(BPA)、17α-乙炔基雌二醇(EE2)及17β-雌二醇(E2)的高效液相色谱方法.采用中心复合设计和响应曲面法分析并优化SPE、DLLME及PLD条件,最佳条件为210 mL水样以2.0 mL/min的流速过固相萃取柱(碳纳米管量30 mg),甲醇洗脱,氮气浓缩并定容至0.6 mL(分散剂),将100 μL C6MIM[PF6]与分散剂的混合液注入到NaCl含量为25％的2.0 mL去离子水中,离心,移取20 μL下层有机相于样品瓶中,与4.0 mg衍生剂混合,在40℃水浴中衍生25 min;用0.1mL甲醇溶解过量的衍生剂颗粒,取20 μL进样分析.在优化条件下.4种雌激素的线性范围为0.05～5.00 μg/L,相关系数R2=0.9966～0.9999;,检出限介于0.13～6.33 ng/L(S/N=3)之间.不同加标浓度条件下,雌激素的加标回收率在83.1％～122.4％范围内(RSD=1.7％～9.6％).在实际水样中E3和BPA检出率较高.与其它方法相比,本方法虽然萃取时间长、水样量大、步骤多,但具有检出限低、操作简便、环境友好等优点.     

分散固相萃取-高效液相色谱法快速测定果蔬中的6种保鲜剂残留量

建立了采用分散固相萃取-高效液相色谱同时测定果蔬中2,4-滴、噻苯咪唑、乙萘酚、邻苯基苯酚、二苯醚和联苯6种保鲜剂残留量的方法。样品经乙腈提取(同时加入氯化钠和无水硫酸镁),提取液经酸性氧化铝分散固相萃取净化,采用Agilent TC C18色谱柱(250 mm×4.6 mm, 5 μm),以甲醇-0.02 mol/L的磷酸二氢钾溶液(pH 6)作为流动相,流速1.0 mL/min,梯度洗脱,用紫外检测器检测,检测波长为235 nm,外标法峰面积定量。6种保鲜剂在0.5～20 mg/L范围内线性关系良好,相关系数均大于0.99; 6种保鲜剂在样品中添加1、2和10 mg/kg 3个浓度水平的回收率为84.2%～99.1% (n=6),相对标准偏差为1.67%～10.3%;方法的定量限为1 mg/kg。该法简便、准确,适用于果蔬中6种保鲜剂残留量的检测。     

基于掺杂金属有机骨架CeDUT-52分散固相萃取/高效液相色谱法检测水中的双酚类化合物

利用溶剂热法构筑了CeDUT-52吸附剂,将其用于水中双酚A(BPA)、双酚F(BPF)和双酚AF(BPAF)3种双酚类化合物的分散固相萃取(DSPE),并结合高效液相色谱-紫外检测,建立了水中3种双酚类化合物的分析方法.采用X射线衍射仪(XRD)、傅里叶变换红外光谱(FT-IR)、扫描电子显微镜(SEM)和X射线能谱...     

固相萃取-分散液液微萃取-高效液相色谱法测定椰子汁中酸性植物激素

本文通过固相萃取结合分子络合物-分散液液微萃取,与高效液相色谱联用,建立了一种测定椰子汁中酸性植物激素的新方法。选择了几种典型酸性植物激素吲哚乙酸、水杨酸、脱落酸和吲哚丁酸作为分析物,考察了该方法的萃取性能。在固相萃取与分子络合物-分散液液微萃取联用模式中,椰子汁中分析物首先吸附在C18萃取材料上,待解吸完成后,解吸液又可用作分散液液微萃取的分散剂,大大简化了萃取步骤。该方法的富集倍数可达319～478倍,线性关系良好,具有良好的精密度和准确度,有望用于植物激素的检测。     

表面分子印迹磁性固相萃取-液相色谱-荧光光谱法测定河水中双酚A

通过原子转移自由基聚合(Atom Transfer Radical Polymerization-ATRP)法制备核壳结构单分散性磁性亚微米粒子( Fe304@ MIPs),并建立了磁性固相萃取-高效液相色谱荧光光谱(MSPE- HPLC - FLD)测定河水中环境类雌激素 双酚A (BPA)的方法.利用透射...     

固相微萃取-高效液相色谱法测定垃圾渗滤液中的双酚A

本文应用固相微萃取一高效液相色谱法(SPME—HPLC)分析了垃圾渗滤液中的痕量双酚A。对SPME的条件如测定模式、pH值、萃取时间、解吸方式、解吸溶剂、解吸时间和HPLC条件进行了优化。建立了SPME—HPLC分析垃圾渗滤液中痕量双酚A的方法。方法的线性范围为12．8～192μg／L,相关系数为0．9975,检出限为3．25μg／L(3σ,n=11)。以12．8μg／L的双酚A标准溶液平行测定11次,相对标准偏差(RSD)为4．4％,回收率为94．5％～103．3％。将其用于分析具有垃圾填埋场的渗滤液实际水样,结果十分满意。该方法具有快速、灵敏、简单、无溶剂的特点,适合于环境水样中痕量双酚A的分析。     

磁性石墨烯固相萃取-分散液液微萃取-气相色谱法测定水和绿茶中酰胺类除草剂残留

采用磁性石墨烯纳米复合材料作为磁性固相萃取剂进行磁性固相萃取,再进行分散液液微萃取,采用气相色谱建立了高灵敏测定环境水样和绿茶中5种酰胺类除草剂残留的方法。对影响萃取效率的诸因素进行了优化。在优化条件下,5种酰胺类除草剂的富集倍数在3399～4002之间,甲草胺、乙草胺、异丙甲草胺、丁草胺和丙草胺浓度在0.1～50μg/L范围内与峰面积呈良好的线性关系,线性相关系数在0.9973～0.9993之间,检出限在0.01～0.03μg/L范围内。本方法应用于河水、自来水和绿茶样品的分析,平均加标回收率在80.2%～108.4%之间,相对标准偏差在3.8%～5.8%之间。本方法操作简单、灵敏、富集倍数高。     

An efficient biosorption‐based dispersive liquid‐liquid microextraction with extractant removal by magnetic nanoparticles for quantification of bisphenol A in water samples by gas chromatography‐mass spectrometry detection

In this work, a simple, fast, sensitive, and environmentally friendly method was developed for preconcentration and quantitative measurement of bisphenol A in water samples using gas chromatography with mass spectrometry. The preconcentration approach, namely biosorption‐based dispersive liquid‐liquid microextraction with extractant removal by magnetic nanoparticles was performed based on the formation of microdroplet of rhamnolipid biosurfactant throughout the aqueous samples, which accelerates the mass transfer process between the extraction solvent and sample solution. The process is then followed by the application of magnetic nanoparticles for easy retrieval of the analyte‐containing extraction solvent. Several important variables were optimized comprehensively including type of disperser solvent and desorption solvent, rhamnolipid concentration, volume of disperser solvent, amount of magnetic nanoparticles, extraction time, desorption time, ionic strength, and sample pH. Under the optimized microextraction and gas chromatography with mass spectrometry conditions, the method demonstrated good linearity over the range of 0.5–500 µg/L with a coefficient of determination of R² = 0.9904, low limit of detection (0.15 µg/L) and limit of quantification (0.50 µg/L) of bisphenol A, good analyte recoveries (84–120%) and acceptable relative standard deviation (1.8–14.9%, n = 6). The proposed method was successfully applied to three environmental water samples, and bisphenol A was detected in all samples.     

基于离子液体的分散液液微萃取-柱前荧光衍生高效液相色谱法测定水样中8种磺胺类药物

建立了一种基于离子液体的分散液液微萃取技术结合柱前荧光衍生高效液相色谱(IL-DLLME-HPLC-FL)对8种磺胺类药物进行检测的方法,并成功应用于实际环境水样的分析。实验考察了萃取参数对磺胺萃取效率的影响及衍生产物的稳定性。最佳实验条件:以40 μL [C₆MIM]PF₆]为萃取剂,0.1 mL丙酮为分散剂,对pH=4且不含NaCl的水溶液进行不超声的分散液液微萃取,并衍生化反应6 h。结果表明:在最佳实验条件下,该法在0.2~10 μg/L和10~500 μg/L两个浓度范围内线性良好,线性相关系数r ≥0.9989;检出限为0.08~0.5 μg/L (S/N=3)。对实验室自来水、湖水、珠江水、池塘水分别加标5、50、200 μg/L的回收率为87.2%~101.4%,相对标准偏差为3.7%~6.2%。该法环保、简便,可用于测定实际水样中磺胺类药物。     

Quantification of free and total bisphenol A and bisphenol B in human urine by dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) and heart-cutting multidimensional gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (MD-GC/MS)

A novel method combining dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) and heart-cutting multidimensional gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry was developed for the determination of free and total bisphenol A (BPA) and bisphenol B (BPB) in human urine samples. The DLLME procedure combines extraction, derivatization and concentration of the analytes into one step. Several important variables influencing the extraction efficiency and selectivity such as nature and volume of extractive and dispersive solvents as well as the amount of acetylating reagent were investigated. The temperature and time to hydrolyze BPA and BPB conjugates with a β-glucuronidase and sulfatase enzyme preparation were also studied. Under the optimized conditions good efficiency extraction (71-93%) and acceptable total DLLME yields (56-77%) were obtained for both analytes. Matrix-matched calibration curves were linear with correlation coefficients higher than 0.996 in the range level 0.1-5 μg/l, and the relative standard deviations (%RSD) were lower than 20% (n = 6). The limits of detection were 0.03 and 0.05 μg/l for BPA and BPB, respectively. The applicability of the proposed method for determining urinary free and total BPA and BPB was assessed by analyzing the human urine of a group of 20 volunteers. Free BPA was detected in 45% of the sample whereas total BPA was detected in 85% of the samples at concentrations ranging between 0.39 and 4.99 μg/l. BPB was detected in conjugated form in two samples.     

分散液液微萃取-衍生化高效液相色谱-荧光检测法测定环境水样中4种酚类内分泌干扰物

为实现小体积环境水样中酚类化合物的准确、快速、高灵敏测定,通过分散液液微萃取(DLLME)和荧光衍生化的结合,建立了高效液相色谱-荧光检测(HPLC-FLD)双酚A、壬基酚、辛基酚和对特辛基酚的分析方法。考察并优化了DLLME和衍生化条件,结果表明,最优的DLLME条件为萃取剂氯仿用量70μL,分散剂乙腈用量400μL,漩涡振荡3 min,高速离心2 min。以2-[2-(7 H-二苯并[a,g]咔唑-乙氧基)]-乙基氯甲酸酯(DBCEC-Cl)为柱前衍生试剂,在pH10.5的Na2CO3-NaHCO3缓冲液/乙腈溶液、50℃下衍生反应3 min得到稳定的衍生产物,于10min内实现了4种酚衍生物的分离。方法的检出限为0.9~1.6 ng/L,定量限为3.8~7.1 ng/L,具有良好的线性、精密度和回收率,与以往报道的方法相比具有一定的优势和实用性,可用于造纸厂废水、湖水、生活废水、自来水中4种酚类内分泌干扰物的测定。     

悬浮固化分散液液微萃取-高效液相色谱法测定水体中邻苯二甲酸酯

建立了悬浮固化分散液液微萃取（SFO-DLLME）结合高效液相色谱（HPLC）快速测定水样中6种邻苯二甲酸酯（PAEs）的分析方法。通过对影响萃取效率因素的优化,确定了最佳萃取条件：十二烷醇萃取剂20 μL、萃取温度60℃、离子强度20 g/L、萃取时间1 min。6种PAEs在2~2000 μg/L范围内呈良好的线性关系,相关系数（r）为0.9995~0.9999,检出限（S/N=3）为0.3~0.6 μg/L。对自来水、湖水、江水、污水、海水、市售塑料瓶装纯净水和矿泉水进行测定,能检测到部分PAEs。对加标水样进行回收率试验（10、100和1000 μg/L）,6种PAEs的回收率为84.9%~94.5%,相对标准偏差为4.1%~6.8%（n=5）。该法环保、简单,可用于实际水样中6种PAEs的检测分析。     

Application of dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction for the preconcentration of eight parabens in real samples and their determination by high‐performance liquid chromatography

A simple and sensitive method for the simultaneous determination of eight parabens in human plasma and urine samples was developed. The samples were preconcentrated using dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction based on the solidification of floating organic drops and determined by high‐performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection. The influence of variables affecting the extraction efficiency was investigated and optimized using Placket–Burman design and Box–Behnken design. The optimized values were: 58 μL of 1‐decanol (as extraction solvent), 0.65 mL methanol (as disperser solvent), 1.5% w/v NaCl in 5.0 mL of sample solution, pH 10.6, and 4.0 min centrifugation at 4000 rpm. The extract was injected into the high‐performance liquid chromatography system for analysis. Under the optimum conditions, the linear ranges for eight parabens in plasma and urine were 1.0–1000 ng/mL, with correlation coefficients above 0.994. The limit of detection was 0.2–0.4 and 0.1–0.4 ng/mL for plasma and urine samples, respectively. Relative recoveries were between 80.3 and 110.7%, while relative standard deviations were less than 5.4%. Finally, the method was applied to analyze the parabens in 98 patients of primary breast cancer. Results showed that parabens existed widely, at least one paraben detected in 96.9% (95/98) of plasma samples and 98.0% (96/98) of urine samples.     

多功能离子液体分散液液微萃取结合高效液相色谱法检测人尿中5种邻苯二甲酸酯代谢物

将多功能离子液体与分散液液微萃取(DLLME)技术相结合,建立了测定尿液中5种邻苯二甲酸酯类(PAEs)物质代谢产物的高灵敏度新方法。对影响DLLME效率的各单因素进行了优化,包括萃取剂的种类及体积、分散剂的种类及体积、萃取温度、超声时间、冷却时间、离心时间和盐效应等条件,经过严格的优化,最佳的萃取条件分别为:萃取剂[C8MIM][PF6]35μL,分散剂[BSO3HMIm][OTf]30μL和[C4MIM][BF6]120μL,萃取温度为35℃,超声时间5 min,冷却时间5 min,离心时间5 min,盐析剂NH4PF60.1 g。在最佳的萃取条件下,5种PAEs代谢物在0.5~1000μg/L范围内具有良好的线性关系,决定系数(R2)均大于0.9955,方法检出限为0.16~0.19μg/L,尿液中添加低中高水平(5、20、100μg/L)的PAEs代谢物,其回收率为92.9%~105.0%,日内精密度及日间精密度的相对标准偏差(RSD)均小于5.96%,方法学验证各指标及稳定性均符合分析要求。对所采集的10份糖尿病患者的尿液进行检测,并对该人群PAEs代谢物的暴露水平进行评价。结果表明,各PAEs代谢物均有检出,其中邻苯二甲酸单(2-乙基己基)酯(MEHP)的检出率为100%。总之,该方法萃取过程中未添加有毒的有机试剂,均使用多功能离子液体作为萃取剂、分散剂和盐析剂,萃取过程绿色环保,简单高效;方法的灵敏度较高,稳定性较好,适用于人体尿液中痕量PAEs代谢物的检测。     

单分散磁性亚微米粒子固相萃取-液相色谱-串联质谱法测定牛奶中的双酚A

采用溶剂热还原法制备的单分散性Fe3O4磁性亚微米粒子(Fe3O4-magnetic submicron particles)进行固相萃取(SPE),结合高效液相色谱-串联质谱(HPLC-MS/MS)测定了牛奶中的双酚A(BPA)。对溶液的pH、磁性粒子用量、洗脱溶剂和体积等影响因素进行了优化,得到的最优萃取条件为: 溶液的pH 6,磁性粒子用量3.5 mg,用0.4 mL甲醇洗脱。以Agilent XDB C18柱为分析柱,流动相为乙腈-0.25 mmol/L氨水（80:20, v/v）溶液,在负离子模式下进行MS/MS测定。双酚A在1～100 μg/L范围内线性关系良好(r=0.9993);在3个添加水平下,回收率为85.3%～96.1%,相对标准偏差小于10%;通过不断稀释加标浓度确定方法的检出限(信噪比为3)为1.0 μg/L。该方法简单、准确,能用于牛奶中双酚A的快速测定。     

丹磺酰肼衍生-高效液相色谱-荧光检测法测定包装纸中的甲醛和乙醛

建立了丹磺酰肼(DNSH)衍生-高效液相色谱-荧光检测测定包装纸中甲醛和乙醛的分析方法,并与2,4-二硝基苯肼(DNPH)衍生法进行了比较。纸张样品经衍生化试剂振荡萃取30 min,衍生化反应24 h,萃取液经PSA/C18净化管净化处理后,以Diamonsil~ C18(2)色谱柱(150 mm×4.6 mm,5μm)为固定相,用醋酸水溶液(pH2.55)-乙腈为流动相进行梯度洗脱。采用荧光检测器检测,激发波长为330 nm,发射波长为484 nm。结果表明,衍生剂、甲醛-DNSH和乙醛-DNSH在20 min内可完全分离,方法的加标回收率为81.64%~106.78%,相对标准偏差(RSD)为2.02%~5.53%(n=5),甲醛和乙醛的检出限分别为19.2μg/kg和20.7μg/kg,定量限分别为63.9μg/kg和69.1μg/kg。该法操作简单,灵敏度高,比常规方法具有更低的检出限,能很好地应用到实际样品检测中,为低含量醛类化合物的检测提供了一种新思路。     

Comparison of three different dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction modes performed on their most usual configurations for the extraction of phenolic,neutral aromatic,and amino compounds from waters

In this work we seek clues to select the appropriate dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction mode for extracting three categories of compounds. For this purpose, three common dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction modes were compared under optimized conditions. Traditional dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction, in situ ionic liquid dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction, and conventional ionic liquid dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction using chloroform, 1‐butyl‐3‐methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate, and 1‐hexyl‐3‐methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate as the extraction solvent, respectively, were considered in this work. Phenolic, neutral aromatic, and amino compounds (each category included six members) were studied as analytes. The analytes in the extracts were determined by high‐performance liquid chromatography with UV detection. For the analytes with polar functionalities, the in situ ionic liquid dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction mode mostly led to better results. In contrast, for neutral hydrocarbons without polar functionalities, traditional dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction using chloroform produced better results. In this case, where dispersion forces were the dominant interactions in the extraction, the refractive index of solvent and analyte predicted the extraction performance better than the octanol/water partition coefficient. It was also revealed that none of the methods were successful in extracting hydrophilic analytes (compounds with the log octanol/water partition coefficient <2). The results of this study could be helpful in selecting a dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction mode for the extraction of various groups of compounds.