An upper bound for domination number of 5-regular graphs

Let G = (V, E) be a simple graph. A subset S ⊆ V is a dominating set of G, if for any vertex u ∈ V-S, there exists a vertex v ∈ S such that uv ∈ E. The domination number, denoted by γ(G), is the minimum cardinality of a dominating set. In this paper we will prove that if G is a 5-regular graph, then γ(G) ⩽ 5/14n.     

THE SECOND EXPONENT SET OF PRIMITIVE DIGRAPHS

51.IntroductionandNotationsLetD=(V,E)beadigraphandL(D)denotethesetofcyclelengthsofD.ForuEVandintegeri21,letfo(u):={vEVIthereedestsadirectedwalkoflengthifromutov}.WedelveRo(u):={u}.Letu,vEV.IfN (v)=N (v)andN--(v)=N--(v),thenwecanvacopyofu.LotDbeaprimitivedigraphand7(D)denotetheexponentofD.In1950,H.WielandtI61foundthat7(D)5(n--1)' 1andshowedthatthereisapiquedigraphthatattainsthisbound.In1964,A.L.DulmageandN.S.Mendelsohn[2]ObservedthattherearegapsintheexponentsetEd={ry(D)IDEPD.}…     

Minimum Cost Homomorphism Dichotomy for Oriented Cycles

For digraphs D and H, a mapping f : V(D) → V(H) is a homomorphism of D to H if uv ∈ A(D) implies f(u) f(v) ∈ A(H). If, moreover, each vertex u ∈ V(D) is associated with costs c _i (u), i ∈ V(H), then the cost of the homomorphism f is ∑ _{u ∈V(D)} c _f(u)(u). For each fixed digraph H, we have the minimum cost homomorphism problem for H (abbreviated MinHOM(H)). The problem is to decide, for an input graph D with costs c _i (u), u ∈ V(D), i ∈ V(H), whether there exists a homomorphism of D to H and, if one exists, to find one of minimum cost. We obtain a dichotomy classification for the time complexity of MinHOM(H) when H is an oriented cycle. We conjecture a dichotomy classification for all digraphs with possible loops.     

The <Emphasis Type="Italic">k</Emphasis>-point exponent set of primitive digraphs with girth 2

Let D = （V, E） be a primitive digraph. The vertex exponent of D at a vertex v∈ V, denoted by expD（v）, is the least integer p such that there is a v →u walk of length p for each u ∈ V. Following Brualdi and Liu, we order the vertices of D so that exPD（V1） ≤ exPD（V2） …≤ exPD（Vn）. Then exPD（Vk） is called the k- point exponent of D and is denoted by exPD （k）, 1≤ k ≤ n. In this paper we define e（n, k） ：= max{expD （k） ｜ D ∈ PD（n, 2）} and E（n, k） ：= {exPD（k）｜ D ∈ PD（n, 2）}, where PD（n, 2） is the set of all primitive digraphs of order n with girth 2. We completely determine e（n, k） and E（n, k） for all n, k with n ≥ 3 and 1 ≤ k ≤ n.     

On the eccentric distance sum of trees and unicyclic graphs

Let G be a simple connected graph with the vertex set V(G). The eccentric distance sum of G is defined as ξd(G)=_∑v∈V(G)ε(v)DG(v), where ε(v) is the eccentricity of the vertex v and DG(v)=_∑u∈V(G)d(u,v) is the sum of all distances from the vertex v. In this paper we characterize the extremal unicyclic graphs among n-vertex unicyclic graphs with given girth having the minimal and second minimal eccentric distance sum. In addition, we characterize the extremal trees with given diameter and minimal eccentric distance sum.     

On Group Chromatic Number of Graphs

Let G be a graph and A an Abelian group. Denote by F(G, A) the set of all functions from E(G) to A. Denote by D an orientation of E(G). For f ∈ F(G,A), an (A,f)-coloring of G under the orientation D is a function c : V(G)↦A such that for every directed edge uv from u to v, c(u)−c(v) ≠ f(uv). G is A-colorable under the orientation D if for any function f ∈ F(G, A), G has an (A, f)-coloring. It is known that A-colorability is independent of the choice of the orientation. The group chromatic number of a graph G is defined to be the least positive integer m for which G is A-colorable for any Abelian group A of order ≥m, and is denoted by χ_g(G). In this note we will prove the following results. (1) Let H₁ and H₂ be two subgraphs of G such that V(H₁)∩V(H₂)=∅ and V(H₁)∪V(H₂)=V(G). Then χ_g(G)≤min{max{χ_g(H₁), max_v∈V(H2)deg(v,G)+1},max{χ_g(H₂), max_u∈V(H1) deg (u, G) + 1}}. We also show that this bound is best possible. (2) If G is a simple graph without a K_3,3-minor, then χ_g(G)≤5.     

On the Roman Bondage Number of Planar Graphs

A Roman dominating function on a graph G is a function f : V(G) → {0, 1, 2} satisfying the condition that every vertex u for which f (u) = 0 is adjacent to at least one vertex v for which f (v) = 2. The weight of a Roman dominating function is the value f (V(G)) = ?_{u ? V(G)} f (u){f (V(G)) = \sum_{u\in V(G)} f (u)}. The Roman domination number, γ _R (G), of G is the minimum weight of a Roman dominating function on G. The Roman bondage number b _R (G) of a graph G with maximum degree at least two is the minimum cardinality of all sets E^￠ í E(G){E^{\prime} \subseteq E(G)} for which γ _R (G − E′) > γ _R (G). In this paper we present different bounds on the Roman bondage number of planar graphs.     

The diameter of paired-domination vertex critical graphs

In this paper we continue the study of paired-domination in graphs introduced by Haynes and Slater (Networks 32 (1998), 199–206). A paired-dominating set of a graph G with no isolated vertex is a dominating set of vertices whose induced subgraph has a perfect matching. The paired-domination number of G, denoted by γ _pr(G), is the minimum cardinality of a paired-dominating set of G. The graph G is paired-domination vertex critical if for every vertex v of G that is not adjacent to a vertex of degree one, γ _pr(G − v) < γ _pr(G). We characterize the connected graphs with minimum degree one that are paired-domination vertex critical and we obtain sharp bounds on their maximum diameter. We provide an example which shows that the maximum diameter of a paired-domination vertex critical graph is at least 3/2 (γ _pr(G) − 2). For γ _pr(G) ⩽ 8, we show that this lower bound is precisely the maximum diameter of a paired-domination vertex critical graph. The first author was supported in part by the South African National Research Foundation and the University of KwaZulu-Natal, the second author was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.     

A Generalization of the Gallai–Roy Theorem

 A well-known and essential result due to Roy ([4], 1967) and independently to Gallai ([3], 1968) is that if D is a digraph with chromatic number χ(D), then D contains a directed path of at least χ(D) vertices. We generalize this result by showing that if ψ(D) is the minimum value of the number of the vertices in a longest directed path starting from a vertex that is connected to every vertex of D, then χ(D) ≤ψ(D). For graphs, we give a positive answer to the following question of Fajtlowicz: if G is a graph with chromatic number χ(G), then for any proper coloring of G of χ(G) colors and for any vertex v∈V(G), there is a path P starting at v which represents all χ(G) colors. Received: May 20, 1999 Final version received: December 24, 1999     

On distance two graphs of upper bound graphs

For a poset P=(X,≤), the upper bound graph (UB-graph) of P is the graph U=(X,E_U), where uv∈E_U if and only if u≠v and there exists m∈X such that u,v≤m. For a graph G, the distance two graph DS₂(G) is the graph with vertex set V(DS₂(G))=V(G) and u,v∈V(DS₂(G)) are adjacent if and only if d_G(u,v)=2. In this paper, we deal with distance two graphs of upper bound graphs. We obtain a characterization of distance two graphs of split upper bound graphs.     

Set vertex colorings and joins of graphs

For a nontrivial connected graph G, let c: V (G) → ℕ be a vertex coloring of G where adjacent vertices may be colored the same. For a vertex v of G, the neighborhood color set NC(v) is the set of colors of the neighbors of v. The coloring c is called a set coloring if NC(u) ≠ NC(v) for every pair u, v of adjacent vertices of G. The minimum number of colors required of such a coloring is called the set chromatic number x _s (G). A study is made of the set chromatic number of the join G+H of two graphs G and H. Sharp lower and upper bounds are established for x _s (G + H) in terms of x _s (G), x _s (H), and the clique numbers ω(G) and ω(H).     

Constructive characterizations of （γp, γ）- and （γp, γpr）-trees

Let G = （V, E） be a graph without isolated vertices. A set S lohtain in V is a domination set of G if every vertex in V - S is adjacent to a vertex in S, that is N[S] = V. The domination number of G, denoted by γ（G）, is the minimum cardinality of a domination set of G. A set S lohtain in V is a paired-domination set of G if S is a domination set of G and the induced subgraph G[S] has a perfect matching. The paired-domination number, denoted by γpr（G）, is defined to be the minimum cardinality of a paired-domination set S in G. A subset S lohtain in V is a power domination set of G if all vertices of V can be observed recursively by the following rules： （i） all vertices in N[S] are observed initially, and （ii） if an observed vertex u has all neighbors observed except one neighbor v, then v is observed （by u）. The power domination number, denoted by γp（G）, is the minimum cardinality of a power domination set of G. In this paper, the constructive characterizations for trees with γp=γ and γpr = γp are provided respectively.     

A Greedy Partition Lemma for directed domination

A directed dominating set in a directed graph D is a set S of vertices of V such that every vertex u∈V(D)?S has an adjacent vertex v in S with v directed to u. The directed domination number of D, denoted by γ(D), is the minimum cardinality of a directed dominating set in D. The directed domination number of a graph G, denoted Γ_d(G), is the maximum directed domination number γ(D) over all orientations D of G. The directed domination number of a complete graph was first studied by Erd?s [P. Erd?s On a problem in graph theory, Math. Gaz. 47 (1963) 220–222], albeit in a disguised form. In this paper we prove a Greedy Partition Lemma for directed domination in oriented graphs. Applying this lemma, we obtain bounds on the directed domination number. In particular, if α denotes the independence number of a graph G, we show that α≤Γ_d(G)≤α(1+2ln(n/α)).     

On the eccentric distance sum of graphs

The eccentric distance sum is a novel topological index that offers a vast potential for structure activity/property relationships. For a graph G, it is defined as ξd(G)=_∑v∈Vε(v)D(v), where ε(v) is the eccentricity of the vertex v and D(v)=_∑u∈V(G)d(u,v) is the sum of all distances from the vertex v. Motivated by [G. Yu, L. Feng, A. Ili?, On the eccentric distance sum of trees and unicyclic graphs, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 375 (2011) 934-944], in this paper we characterize the extremal trees and graphs with maximal eccentric distance sum. Various lower and upper bounds for the eccentric distance sum in terms of other graph invariants including the Wiener index, the degree distance, eccentric connectivity index, independence number, connectivity, matching number, chromatic number and clique number are established. In addition, we present explicit formulae for the values of eccentric distance sum for the Cartesian product, applied to some graphs of chemical interest (like nanotubes and nanotori).     

On signed distance-k-domination in graphs

The signed distance-k-domination number of a graph is a certain variant of the signed domination number. If v is a vertex of a graph G, the open k-neighborhood of v, denoted by N _k (v), is the set N _k (v) = {u: u ≠ v and d(u, v) ⩽ k}. N _k [v] = N _k (v) ⋃ {v} is the closed k-neighborhood of v. A function f: V → {−1, 1} is a signed distance-k-dominating function of G, if for every vertex . The signed distance-k-domination number, denoted by γ _k,s (G), is the minimum weight of a signed distance-k-dominating function on G. The values of γ _2,s (G) are found for graphs with small diameter, paths, circuits. At the end it is proved that γ _2,s (T) is not bounded from below in general for any tree T.     

Cycles in Partially Square Graphs

. In this work we consider finite undirected simple graphs. If G=(V,E) is a graph we denote by α(G) the stability number of G. For any vertex x let N[x] be the union of x and the neighborhood N(x). For each pair of vertices ab of G we associate the set J(a,b) as follows. J(a,b)={u∈N[a]∩N[b]∣N(u)⊆N[a]∪N[b]}. Given a graph G, its partially squareG ^* is the graph obtained by adding an edge uv for each pair u,v of vertices of G at distance 2 whenever J(u,v) is not empty. In the case G is a claw-free graph, G ^* is equal to G ². If G is k-connected, we cover the vertices of G by at most ⌈α(G ^*)/k⌉ cycles, where α(G ^*) is the stability number of the partially square graph of G. On the other hand we consider in G ^* conditions on the sum of the degrees. Let G be any 2-connected graph and t be any integer (t≥2). If ∑ _{x ∈ S} deg _G (x)≥|G|, for every t-stable set S⊆V(G) of G ^* then the vertex set of G can be covered with t−1 cycles. Different corollaries on covering by paths are given. Received: January 22, 1997 Final version received: February 15, 2000     

Minus total domination in graphs

A three-valued function f: V → {−1, 0, 1} defined on the vertices of a graph G= (V, E) is a minus total dominating function (MTDF) if the sum of its function values over any open neighborhood is at least one. That is, for every υ ∈ V, f(N(υ)) ⩾ 1, where N(υ) consists of every vertex adjacent to υ. The weight of an MTDF is f(V) = Σf(υ), over all vertices υ ∈ V. The minus total domination number of a graph G, denoted γ _t ⁻(G), equals the minimum weight of an MTDF of G. In this paper, we discuss some properties of minus total domination on a graph G and obtain a few lower bounds for γ _t ⁻(G).     

The geodetic numbers of graphs and digraphs

For every two vertices u and v in a graph G,a u-v geodesic is a shortest path between u and v.Let I(u,v)denote the set of all vertices lying on a u-v geodesic.For a vertex subset S,let I(S) denote the union of all I(u,v)for u,v∈S.The geodetic number g(G)of a graph G is the minimum cardinality of a set S with I(S)=V(G).For a digraph D,there is analogous terminology for the geodetic number g(D).The geodetic spectrum of a graph G,denoted by S(G),is the set of geodetic numbers of all orientations of graph G.The lower geodetic number is g~-(G)=minS(G)and the upper geodetic number is g~ (G)=maxS(G).The main purpose of this paper is to study the relations among g(G),g~-(G)and g~ (G)for connected graphs G.In addition,a sufficient and necessary condition for the equality of g(G)and g(G×K_2)is presented,which improves a result of Chartrand,Harary and Zhang.     

Survey of Double Vertex Graphs

 Let G be a (V,E) graph of order p≥2. The double vertex graph U ₂ (G) is the graph whose vertex set consists of all 2-subsets of V such that two distinct vertices {x,y} and {u,v} are adjacent if and only if |{x,y}∩{u,v}|=1 and if x=u, then y and v are adjacent in G. For this class of graphs we discuss the regularity, eulerian, hamiltonian, and bipartite properties of these graphs. A generalization of this concept is n-tuple vertex graphs, defined in a manner similar to double vertex graphs. We also review several recent results for n-tuple vertex graphs. Received: October, 2001 Final version received: September 20, 2002 Dedicated to Frank Harary on the occasion of his Eightieth Birthday and the Manila International Conference held in his honor     

The vertex linear arboricity of distance graphs

A distance graph is a graph G(R,D) with the set of all points of the real line as vertex set and two vertices u,v∈R are adjacent if and only if |u-v|∈D where the distance set D is a subset of the positive real numbers. Here, the vertex linear arboricity of G(R,D) is determined when D is an interval between 1 and δ. In particular, the vertex linear arboricity of integer distance graphs G(D) is discussed, too.