无爪图泛圈性的邻域并条件

证明了,若G是一个p-阶3-连通无爪图,p≠10,11,15,并对G中任意两个不相邻的点u和v,满足|N(u)∪N(v)|≥(p-1)/2,则G是泛圈图.     

本质集的邻域并和图的哈密尔顿性

Let G be a graph. An independent set Y in G is called an essential independent set (or essential set for simplicity) if there is {Y1, Y2} 包含于Y such that dist (y1,y2)=2. In this paper, we use the technique of the vertex insertion on l-connected (l=k or k 1, k≥2) graphs to provide a unified proof for G to be hamiltonian, or hamiltonian-connected. The sufficient conditions are expressed an inequality on ∑i=1 K|N(Yi)| b|N(y0)| and n(Y) for each essential set Y={y0,y1,…,yk}, where b (1≤b≤k）is an integer,Yi={yi,yi-1,…,yi-(b-1}包含于Y\{y0} for i属于V（G):dist(v,Y)≤2}|.     

点泛圈性的邻域并条件

该文利用邻域并条件讨论图的点泛圈性，证明了当min{│N(u)∪N(v)│u,v∈V(G),     

Hamilton连通性和邻域并条件

设G＝（V，E）为简单图，δ为图G的最小度，1987年Faudree等人给出NC＝min{|N(x)∪N(y)‖x,y∈V(G),xy∈N(G)}，有关文献曾研究3连通的H连通图，本文进一步得到：若G是n阶2连通图，且NC≥n-δ，则G除几个图外均是H连通图，从而，完成了邻并条件的H连通图问题。     

关于图与圈之并图的圈唯一性

Farrell[1]引进图 G 的圈多项式 c(G;■).文[6]猜测:轮形图 W_8是圈唯一的.本文中我们证明上述猜测为真且讨论了某些图与圈之并图的圈唯一性.     

一类泛圈图

本文证明了如果 Ｇ 是 ２ 连通无爪图, Ｇ 不是圈,ｎ＝ ｜ Ｖ（ Ｇ）｜≥９, Ｇ 的每个导出子图 Ａ都满足φ（ａ１,ａ２ ）,且 Ｇ 中不含同构于 Ｚ＋２ 的导出子图,则 Ｇ是泛圈图     

一类泛圈图

本证明了如果G是2连通无爪图,G不是圈,n=|V(G)1≥9,G的每个导出子圈A都满足φ（a1,a2),且G中不含同构于Z^ 2的导出子图,则G是泛圈图。     

一类几乎唯一泛圈图

设G是阶为n的简单Hamilton图．若存在m(3(?)m相似文献   

关于几乎唯一泛圈图

设G是阶为n的简单Hamilton图．若存在m(3(?)m＜n)使对每个l∈{3,4,…,n} -{m},G恰有一个长为l的圈且不含长为m的圈,则称G是几乎唯一泛圈图,用(?)k表示具有n k条边和恰有1/2(k 1)(k 2)个圈的简单H图的集合,用(?)_k~*表示具有n k条边恰有2~k k个圈的简单外可平面H图的集合,本文确定了(?)_k和(?)_k~*中所有几乎唯一泛圈图,并证明这些图都是简单MCD图,本文还构造了50个含有同胚于K_4的子图的几乎唯一泛圈图,并提出了若干问题和猜想。     

Bondy的泛圈图定理的改进

记G=(V,E)是简单图,1971年Bondy得到O re条件下的泛圈图的著名结果:若2连通n阶图G的不相邻的任两点x、y均有d(x) d(y)≥n,则G是泛圈图或G=Kn/2,n/2.这里进一步研究条件d(x) d(y)≥n-1,得到:若2连通n阶图G的不相邻的任两点x、y均有d(x) d(y)≥n-1,则G是泛圈图或G∈{K(Cn 1)/2∨G(n-1)/2,Kn/2,n/2}.本文作者得知最近国际著名权威专家Ho lton等人也得到完全相同的结果,但本证明更简捷.     

Pancyclic arcs and connectivity in tournaments

A tournament is an orientation of the edges of a complete graph. An arc is pancyclic in a tournament T if it is contained in a cycle of length l, for every 3 ≤ l ≤ |T|. Let p(T) denote the number of pancyclic arcs in a tournament T. In 4 , Moon showed that for every non‐trivial strong tournament T, p(T) ≥ 3. Actually, he proved a somewhat stronger result: for any non‐trivial strong tournament h(T) ≥ 3 where h(T) is the maximum number of pancyclic arcs contained in the same hamiltonian cycle of T. Moreover, Moon characterized the tournaments with h(T) = 3. All these tournaments are not 2‐strong. In this paper, we investigate relationship between the functions p(T) and h(T) and the connectivity of the tournament T. Let p_k(n) := min {p(T), T k‐strong tournament of order n} and h_k(n) := min{h(T), T k‐strong tournament of order n}. We conjecture that (for k ≥ 2) there exists a constant α_k> 0 such that p_k(n) ≥ α_kn and h_k(n) ≥ 2k+1. In this paper, we establish the later conjecture when k = 2. We then characterized the tournaments with h(T) = 4 and those with p(T) = 4. We also prove that for k ≥ 2, p_k(n) ≥ 2k+3. At last, we characterize the tournaments having exactly five pancyclic arcs. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 47: 87–110, 2004     

泛圈图方面的著名Bondy定理的简单证明

本文用极好的新方法给出泛图图方面的Bondy定理的简捷证明。     

Hamilton非二部图的弱泛圈性

图G称为弱泛圈图是指G包含了每个长为t(g(V)≤l≤c(G))的圈,其中g(G),c(v)分别是G的围长与周长.1997年Brandt提出以下猜想:边数大于[n2/4]-n 5的n阶非二部图为弱泛圈图.1999年Bollobas和Thomason证明了边数不小于[n2/4]-n 59的n阶非二部图为弱泛圈图.作者证明了如下结论:设G是n阶Hamilton非二部图,若G的边数不小于[n2/4]-n 12,则G为弱泛圈图.     

具有最小弧数的唯一泛圈有向图的计数

唯一泛圈有向图D是一个定向图,对每一个n,3≤n≤υ,D中有且只有一个长为n的有向圈.用g(υ)表示具有υ个顶点的唯一泛圈有向图最小可能的弧数,用N(υ)表示具有υ个顶点、g(υ)条弧且互不同构的唯一泛圈有向图的个数.确定了当υ=3,4,5,6,7,8时的N(υ).     

邻域并与生成迹

本文研究生成迹的邻域并条件。文［２］给出了生成迹的ｏｒｅ型条件，下限为ｐ－２。本文将给出一个生成迹的邻域并条件，下限为（ｐ－３）／２。     

Unions and the axiom of choice

We study statements about countable and well‐ordered unions and their relation to each other and to countable and well‐ordered forms of the axiom of choice. Using WO as an abbreviation for “well‐orderable”, here are two typical results: The assertion that every WO family of countable sets has a WO union does not imply that every countable family of WO sets has a WO union; the axiom of choice for WO families of WO sets does not imply that the countable union of countable sets is WO. (© 2008 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)     

关于点可数序列邻域网

Ｉｔｉｓｋｎｏｗｎｔｏａｌｌｔｈａｔｔｈｅｔｈｅｏｒｙｏｆｔｈｅｐｏｉｎｔ－ｃｏｕｎｔａｂｌｅｃｏｖｅｒｓｂｅｏｎｅｏｆｔｈｅｍｏｓｔｉｍｐｏｒ－ｔａｎｔｓｕｂｊｅｃｔｓｉｎＧｅｎｅｒａｌＴｏｐｏｌｏｇｙ．Ｔｈｅｐｏｉｎｔ－ｃｏｕｎｔａｂｌｅｃｏｖｅｒｓｗｉｔｈｖａｒｉｏｕｓｃｈａｒａｃｔｅｒｈａｖｅｂｅｅｎｄｉｓｃｕｓｓｅｄｂｙｍａｎｙｔｏｐｏｌｏｇｉｓｔｓ,ｓｕｃｈａｓＬｉｎａｎｄＴａｎａｋａ’ｓｐａｐｅｒ［１］ｏｎｐｏｉｎｔ－ｃｏｕｎｔａｂｌｅＫ－ｎｅｔｗｏｒｋ．Ｉｎｔｈｉｓｐａｐｅｒ,ｗ…