Ex‐Situ Kinetic Investigations of the Formation of the Poly‐Oxo Cluster U38

The ex‐situ qualitative study of the kinetic formation of the poly‐oxo cluster U₃₈, has been investigated after the solvothermal reaction. The resulting products have been characterized by means of powder XRD and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) for the solid phase and UV/Vis, X‐ray absorption near edge structure (XANES), extended X‐ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS), and NMR spectroscopies for the supernatant liquid phase. The analysis of the different synthesis batches, stopped at different reaction times, revealed the formation of spherical crystallites of UO₂ from t=3 h, after the formation of unknown solid phases at an early stage. The crystallization of U₃₈ occurred from t=4 h at the expense of UO₂, and is completed after t=8 h. Starting from pure uranium(IV) species in solution (t=0–1 h), oxidation reactions are observed with a U^IV/U^VI ratio of 70:30 for t=1–3 h. Then, the ratio is inversed with a U^IV/U^VI ratio of 25/75, when the precipitation of UO₂ occurs. Thorough SEM observations of the U₃₈ crystallites showed that the UO₂ aggregates are embedded within. This may indicate that UO₂ acts as reservoir of uranium(IV), for the formation of U₃₈, stabilized by benzoate and THF ligands. During the early stages of the U₃₈ crystallization, a transient crystallized phase appeared at t=4 h. Its crystal structure revealed a new dodecanuclear moiety (U₁₂), based on the inner hexanuclear core of {U₆O₈} type, decorated by three additional pairs of dinuclear U₂ units. The U₁₂ motif is stabilized by benzoate, oxalates, and glycolate ligands.     

X‐ray photoreduction of U(VI)‐bearing compounds

During XPS analysis, the soft X‐ray‐induced reduction of metals such as Cr(VI) and Ce(IV) in oxides has been reported in the literature and some mechanisms have been proposed to explain this phenomenon. The reduction of U(VI) by the beam during X‐ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy has been already reported in the literature but only for U(VI) sorbed or precipitated onto solids with reducing properties (as micas or pyrites) for whose Fe(II) can also induce the reduction of U(VI), or onto TiO₂ whose the photocatalytic properties are well known. The objective of this paper is to investigate the effects of X‐ray beam on U(VI) bulk compounds (UO₃, UO₂(OH)₂, (UO₂)₂SiO₄, UO₂(CH₃COO)₂ and UO₂C₂O₄). Successive U4f, U5f, C1s XPS spectra were recorded and compared as a function of the irradiation time. The XPS photoreduction of U(VI) into U(IV) is only observed for uranyl compounds containing organic matter (uranyl acetate and uranyl oxalate). Considering the evolution of the C1s signal during the X‐ray irradiation, a significant decrease of the C ? O component simultaneously to the U(VI) reduction is observed, which suggests a desorption of CO or other volatile organic products from the solid surface. All these results on U(VI) bulk compounds indicate the important role of organic carbon species in the photoreduction process and to explain these observations, a photoreduction mechanism has been suggested. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Cooperative Capture of Uranyl Ions by a Carbonyl‐Bearing Hierarchical‐Porous Cu–Organic Framework

To efficiently capture the toxic uranyl ions (UO₂²⁺), a new hierarchical micro‐macroporous metal–organic framework was prepared under template‐free conditions, featuring interconnected multi‐nanocages bearing carbonyl groups derived from a semi‐rigid ligand. The material exhibits an unusually high UO₂²⁺ sorption capacity of 562 mg g^?1, which occurs in an intriguing two‐steps process, on the macropore‐based crystal surface and in the inner nanocages. Notably, the latter is attributed to the cooperative interplay of the shrinkage of the host porous framework induced by uranyl accommodation and the free carbonyl coordination sites, as shown by both single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction and a red‐shift of the infrared [O=U^VI=O]²⁺ antisymmetric vibration band.     

The Key Role of U28 in the Aqueous Self‐Assembly of Uranyl Peroxide Nanocages

For 11 years now, the structural diversity and aesthetic beauty of uranyl–peroxide capsules have fascinated researchers from the diverse fields of mineralogy, polyoxometalate chemistry, and nuclear fuel technologies. There is still much to be learned about the mechanisms of the self‐assembly process, and the role of solution parameters including pH, alkali template, temperature, time, and others. Here we have exploited the high solubility of the UO₂²⁺/H₂O₂/LiOH aqueous system to address the effect of the hydroxide concentration. Important techniques of this study are single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction, small‐angle X‐ray scattering, and Raman spectroscopy. Three key phases dominate the solution speciation as a function of time and the LiOH/UO₂²⁺ ratio: the uranyl–triperoxide monomer [UO₂(O₂)₃]^4?and the two capsules [(UO₂)(O₂)(OH)]₂₄^24?(U₂₄) and [(UO₂)(O₂)_1.5]₂₈^28?(U₂₈). When the LiOH/U ratio is around three, U₂₈ forms rapidly and this cluster can be isolated in high yield and purity. This result was most surprising and challenges the hypothesis that alkali templating is the most important determinant in the cluster geometry. Moreover, analogous experiments with KOH, NH₄OH, and TEAOH (TEA=tetraethylammonium) also rapidly yield U₂₈, which suggests that U₂₈ is the kinetically favored species. Complete mapping of the pH–time phase space reveals only a narrow window of the U₂₈ dominance, which is why it was previously overlooked as an important kinetic species in this chemical system, as well as others with different counterions.     

The Local Uranium Environment in Cesium Uranates: A Combined XPS, XAS, XRD, and Neutron Diffraction Analysis

The cesium uranates Cs₂UO₄, Cs₂U₂O₇, Cs₄U₅O₁₇ and Cs₂U₄O₁₂ were studied using X-ray Diffraction (XRD), neutron diffraction, X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) and X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy (XAS) in an attempt to couple the crystallographic structure to the uranium valence state using the local uranium environment. The diffraction spectra were used for Rietveld refinement to determine the atomic positions and interatomic distances. These distances were subsequently used in Bond Valence Sum (BVS) calculations to determine the uranium valences. The XAS spectra give direct information on the local uranium environment regarding the U-O distances and the arrangement of the oxygen atoms around the central uranium. The difference between the monovalent uranates and the multivalent Cs₂U₄O₁₂ is clearly established in all spectra, as well as in the crystal structures. The different valences present can be assigned to individual uranium lattice sites, but some amount of disorder is required to balance the charges.     

Interaction of AnVI with Isothiocyanate Ion in Water‐Organic Media (An = U,Np, Pu)

Behavior of U^VI, Np^VI and Pu^VI in water‐acetonitrile solutions was studied spectrophotometrically with the successive addition of the polar organic ligands (dimethyl sulfoxide or hexamethylphosphoric triamide) and the NCS^– ion. The detected spectral effects – changes in the absorption intensity, bathochromic shifts in the absorption bands, the absence of isosbestic points, a change in the color of the solution – indicate complex competitive processes occurring in the studied solutions. In the case of Np^VI, its partial reduction to Np^IV by NCS^– ion is observed. Solid U^VI complex, [UO₂(HMPA)₂(NCS)₂], was isolated, its crystal structure was determined using X‐ray diffraction. In contrast to known AnO₂²⁺ compounds with the NCS^– ion, this complex exhibits tetragonal bipyramidal environment of the U atom. [UO₂(HMPA)₂(NCS)₂] is also characterized by UV/Vis, IR and luminescence spectroscopy.     

A Novel Polymeric Lead(II)‐Azido Compound: Synthesis,Structural Characterization,and DFT Calculations of [Pb(dmp)(N3)2]n

A novel 1D Pb^II coordination polymer containing Pb₂‐(μ‐N₃)₂ unit [Pb(dmp)(N₃)₂]_n (dmp =  2,9‐dimethyl‐1,10‐phenanthroline) has been prepared and characterized. Single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction analyses show that the coordination number for Pb^II ions is six, PbN₆, with “stereochemically active” electron lone pairs and the coordination sphere being hemidirected. The single‐crystal X‐ray data show the chains interact with each other through the π–π stacking interactions, which create a 3D framework. The structure of title complex has been optimized by density functional theory. Structural parameters and IR spectra for the complex are in agreement with the crystal structure.     

A Novel 1D Coordination Polymer [Pb(phen)(μ‐N3)(μ‐NO3)]n with the First Pb2‐(μ‐N3)2 Unit (phen = 1,10‐phenanthroline)

A novel 1D polymeric lead(II) complex containing the first Pb₂‐(μ‐N₃)₂ motif, [Pb(phen)(μ‐N₃)(μ‐NO₃)]_n (phen = 1,10‐phenanthroline), has been synthesized and characterized. The single‐crystal X‐ray data showed the coordination number of Pb²⁺ ions to be eight (PbN₄O₄) with the Pb²⁺ ions having “stereo‐chemically active” electron lone pairs; the coordination sphere is hemidirected. The chains interact with each other via π‐π interactions to create a 3D framework.     

Syntheses and Structures of Trilithium Cyclotriphosphazenates Equipped with 2‐Halo‐aryl Substituents

Hexakis (2‐halo‐anilino) cyclotriphosphazenes (2‐X‐C₆H₄NH)₆P₃N₃ {X = F ( 1d ), Cl ( 1e ), Br ( 1f )} were prepared by refluxing mixtures of hexachloro cyclotriphosphazene, 2‐haloaniline and triethylamine in toluene and characterized by single crystal X‐ray diffraction. 1d , 1e and 1f were reacted with ⁿBuLi in thf. Reactions were monitored with ³¹P NMR. Addition of three equivalents of ⁿBuLi yields lithium complexes of trianionic phosphazenates [{(thf)₂Li}₃{(2‐X‐C₆H₄N)₃(2‐X‐C₆H₄NH)₃P₃N₃}] {X= F ( 2d ), Cl ( 2e ) and Br ( 2f )}. 2d , 2e and 2f were structurally characterized by X‐ray diffraction, which reveals monomeric cis‐metalated phosphazenates featuring central P₃N₃ ring systems of chair conformation. Lithium ions reside in three N(eq)‐P‐N(endo) chelation sites at one face of the P₃N₃ ring system. Li…X distances are rather long (> 3Å) indicating no Li‐X interactions.     

A two‐dimensional coordination polymer: poly[diaqua(μ4‐4,4′‐oxydibenzoato)(μ2‐4,4′‐oxydibenzoato)dilead(II)]

In a new two‐dimensional coordination polymer, [Pb(C₁₄H₈O₅)(H₂O)]_n, the asymmetric unit consists of a Pb^II cation, two halves of two crystallographically distinct fully deprotonated 4,4′‐oxydibenzoate ligands and one aqua ligand. Single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction analysis reveals that the compound is a coordination polymer with the point symbol {5³}₂{5⁴.8²}. In addition, it exhibits a strong fluorescence emission in the solid state at room temperature.     

Subtle Interactions and Electron Transfer between UIII,NpIII, or PuIII and Uranyl Mediated by the Oxo Group

A dramatic difference in the ability of the reducing An^III center in AnCp₃ (An=U, Np, Pu; Cp=C₅H₅) to oxo‐bind and reduce the uranyl(VI) dication in the complex [(UO₂)(THF)(H₂L)] (L=“Pacman” Schiff‐base polypyrrolic macrocycle), is found and explained. These are the first selective functionalizations of the uranyl oxo by another actinide cation. At‐first contradictory electronic structural data are explained by combining theory and experiment. Complete one‐electron transfer from Cp₃U forms the U^IV‐uranyl(V) compound that behaves as a U^V‐localized single molecule magnet below 4 K. The extent of reduction by the Cp₃Np group upon oxo‐coordination is much less, with a Np^III‐uranyl(VI) dative bond assigned. Solution NMR and NIR spectroscopy suggest Np^IVU^V but single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction and SQUID magnetometry suggest a Np^III‐U^VI assignment. DFT‐calculated Hirshfeld charge and spin density analyses suggest half an electron has transferred, and these explain the strongly shifted NMR spectra by spin density contributions at the hydrogen nuclei. The Pu^III–U^VI interaction is too weak to be observed in THF solvent, in agreement with calculated predictions.     

Subtle Interactions and Electron Transfer between UIII,NpIII, or PuIII and Uranyl Mediated by the Oxo Group

A dramatic difference in the ability of the reducing An^III center in AnCp₃ (An=U, Np, Pu; Cp=C₅H₅) to oxo‐bind and reduce the uranyl(VI) dication in the complex [(UO₂)(THF)(H₂L)] (L=“Pacman” Schiff‐base polypyrrolic macrocycle), is found and explained. These are the first selective functionalizations of the uranyl oxo by another actinide cation. At‐first contradictory electronic structural data are explained by combining theory and experiment. Complete one‐electron transfer from Cp₃U forms the U^IV‐uranyl(V) compound that behaves as a U^V‐localized single molecule magnet below 4 K. The extent of reduction by the Cp₃Np group upon oxo‐coordination is much less, with a Np^III‐uranyl(VI) dative bond assigned. Solution NMR and NIR spectroscopy suggest Np^IVU^V but single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction and SQUID magnetometry suggest a Np^III‐U^VI assignment. DFT‐calculated Hirshfeld charge and spin density analyses suggest half an electron has transferred, and these explain the strongly shifted NMR spectra by spin density contributions at the hydrogen nuclei. The Pu^III–U^VI interaction is too weak to be observed in THF solvent, in agreement with calculated predictions.     

Investigation of Uranium Tris(imido) Complexes: Synthesis,Characterization, and Reduction Chemistry of [U(NDIPP)3(thf)3]

Addition of KC₈ to trivalent [UI₃(thf)₄] in the presence of three equivalents of 2,6‐diisopropylphenylazide (N₃DIPP) results in the formation of the hexavalent uranium tris(imido) complex [U(NDIPP)₃(thf)₃] ( 1 ) through a facile, single‐step synthesis. The X‐ray crystal structure shows an octahedral complex that adopts a facial orientation of the imido substituents. This structural trend is maintained during the single‐electron reduction of 1 to form dimeric [U(NDIPP)₃{K(Et₂O)}]₂ ( 2 ). Variable‐temperature/field magnetization studies of 2 show two independent U^V 5f ¹ centers, with no antiferromagnetic coupling present. Characterization of these complexes was accomplished using single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction, variable‐temperature ¹H NMR spectroscopy, as well as IR and UV/Vis absorption spectroscopic studies.     

Investigation of Uranium Tris(imido) Complexes: Synthesis,Characterization, and Reduction Chemistry of [U(NDIPP)3(thf)3]

Addition of KC₈ to trivalent [UI₃(thf)₄] in the presence of three equivalents of 2,6‐diisopropylphenylazide (N₃DIPP) results in the formation of the hexavalent uranium tris(imido) complex [U(NDIPP)₃(thf)₃] ( 1 ) through a facile, single‐step synthesis. The X‐ray crystal structure shows an octahedral complex that adopts a facial orientation of the imido substituents. This structural trend is maintained during the single‐electron reduction of 1 to form dimeric [U(NDIPP)₃{K(Et₂O)}]₂ ( 2 ). Variable‐temperature/field magnetization studies of 2 show two independent U^V 5f ¹ centers, with no antiferromagnetic coupling present. Characterization of these complexes was accomplished using single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction, variable‐temperature ¹H NMR spectroscopy, as well as IR and UV/Vis absorption spectroscopic studies.     

Thallium(I)-Uranates(VI)

The solid state preparation, thermal and hydrolytic characteristics of thallium(I)—uranates(VI) are described. The phases identified were Tl₂UO₄, Tl₂U₂O₇ and a range of solid solution (Tl₂O. 2,33 UO₃? Tl₂O. 6 UO₃). The thallium uranates are isostructural with the corresponding potassium uranates. Tl₂U₂O₇ is the stable phase formed from the other uranates on hydrolytic treatment. The thallium uranates lose thallium(I) oxide on heating to temperatures above 750°C and the order of thermal stability is Tl₂U₆O₁₉～Tl₂U₃O₁₀～Tl₂U₂O₇»Tl₂UO₄.     

Direct Synthesis of PbO Nanoparticles From a Lead(II) Nano Coordination Polymer Precursor: Synthesis,Crystal Structure,and DFT Calculations of [Pb2(dmp)2(μ‐N3)2(μ‐ClO4)2]n with the First Pb2‐(μ‐ClO4)2 Unit

Nanostructures of a new coordination polymer of divalent lead with the ligand 2, 9‐dimethyl‐1, 10‐phenanthroline (dmp) containing the first Pb₂‐(μ‐ClO₄)₂ motif, [Pb₂(dmp)₂(μ‐N₃)₂(μ‐ClO₄)₂]_n ( 1 ), was synthesized by a sonochemical method that produces the coordination polymers at nano size. The new nanostructure was characterized by scanning electron microscopy, X‐ray powder diffraction, IR, ¹H NMR and ¹³C NMR spectroscopy, and elemental analysis. Compound 1 was structurally characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction and the single‐crystal X‐ray data shows that the coordination number of Pb^II ions is six, (PbN₄O₂), with two N‐donor atoms from aza‐aromatic base ligands and four O‐donors from two perchlorate anions and two N‐donors from two azide anions. It has a “stereo‐chemically active” electron lone pair, and the coordination sphere is hemidirected. The supramolecular features in these complexes are guided and controlled by weak directional intermolecular interactions. The chains interact with each other through π–π stacking interactions creating a 3D framework. The structure of the title complex was optimized by density functional theory calculations. Calculated structural parameters and IR spectra for the title complex are in agreement with the crystal structure. The PbO nanoparticles were obtained by thermolysis of 1 at 180 °C with oleic acid as a surfactant. The average diameter of the nanoparticles was estimated by the Scherrer equation to be 23 nm. The morphology and size of the prepared PbO samples were further observed using SEM.     

Sonochemical Synthesis of a Novel Nanoscale Lead(II) Coordination Polymer: Synthesis,Crystal Structure,Thermal Properties,and DFT Calculations of [Pb(dmp)(μ‐N3)(μ‐NO3)]n with the Novel Pb2(μ‐N3)2(μ‐NO3)2 Unit

A new nanostructured coordination polymer of divalent lead with the ligand 2,9‐dimethyl‐1,10‐phenanthroline (dmp), [Pb(dmp)(μ‐N₃)(μ‐NO₃)]_n ( 1 ), was synthesized by sonochemical methods. The polymer was characterized by scanning electron microscopy, X‐ray powder diffraction, IR, ¹H NMR, and ¹³C NMR spectroscopy, and elemental analyses. Compound 1 was structurally characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. The single‐crystal analysis shows that the coordination number of Pb^II ions is seven, (PbN₄O₃) has a “stereo‐chemically active” electron lone pair, and the coordination sphere is hemidirected. The chains interact with each other through π–π stacking interactions to create a 3D framework. The structure of the title complex was optimized by density functional calculations. The calculated structural parameters and the IR spectrum of the title complex are in agreement with the crystal structure.     

An experimental and theoretical approach to the molecular structure of 3‐{[4‐(3‐Methyl‐3‐phenyl‐cyclobutyl)‐thiazol‐2‐yl]‐hydrazono}‐1,3‐dihydro‐ indol‐2‐one

The title molecule, 3‐{[4‐(3‐methyl‐3‐phenyl‐cyclobutyl)‐thiazol‐2‐yl]‐hydrazono}‐1,3‐dihydro‐indol‐2‐one (C₂₂H₂₀N₄O₁S₁), was prepared and characterized by ¹H NMR, ¹³C NMR, IR, UV–visible, and single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. The compound crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P21 with a = 8.3401(5), b = 5.6976(3), c = 20.8155(14) Å, and β = 95.144(5)°. Molecular geometry from X‐ray experiment and vibrational frequencies of the title compound in the ground state has been calculated using the Hartree–Fock with 6‐31G(d, p) and density functional method (B3LYP) with 6‐31G(d, p) and 6‐311G(d, p) basis sets, and compared with the experimental data. The calculated results show that optimized geometries can well reproduce the crystal structural parameters, and the theoretical vibrational frequencies values show good agreement with experimental data. Density functional theory calculations of the title compound and thermodynamic properties were performed at B3LYP/6‐31G(d, p) level of theory. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Quantum Chem, 2012     

A Novel Metal–Ligand Iodo‐bridged Lead(II) Compound: Synthesis,Crystal Structure,Thermal Properties,and DFT Calculations of [Pb(dmp)I2]n

. A novel 1D Pb^II coordination polymer [Pb(dmp)I₂]_n ( 1 ) (dmp = 2,9‐dimethyl‐1,10‐phenanthroline) containing a Pb₂‐(μ‐I)₂ unit was synthesized and characterized by elemental analysis, IR, ¹H NMR, and ¹³C NMR spectroscopy and studied by thermal analysis as well as X‐ray crystallography. The single‐crystal X‐ray data show that the coordination number of Pb^II ions is six, i.e. PbN₂I₄, with “stereo‐chemically active” electron lone pairs, and the coordination sphere is asymmetrical. They also show that the chains interact with each other through π‐π stacking interactions, which create a 3D framework. The structure of the title complex has been optimized by density functional theory calculations. The calculated structural parameters and the IR spectra of the title complex are in agreement with the crystal structure.     

Structural Observations of Heterometallic Uranyl Copper(II) Carboxylates and Their Solid‐State Topotactic Transformation upon Dehydration

The hydrothermal reactions of uranyl nitrate and metallic copper with aromatic polycarboxylic acids gave rise to the formation of five heterometallic UO₂²⁺? Cu²⁺ coordination polymers: (UO₂)Cu(H₂O)₂(1,2‐bdc)₂ ( 1 ; 1,2‐bdc=phthalate), (UO₂)Cu(H₂O)₂(btec) ? 4 H₂O ( 2 ) and (UO₂)Cu(btec) ( 2′ ; btec=pyromellitate), (UO₂)₂Cu(H₂O)₄(mel) ( 3 ; mel=mellitate), and (UO₂)₂O(OH)₂Cu(H₂O)₂(1,3‐bdc) ? H₂O ( 4 ; 1,3‐bdc=isophthlalate). Single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction (XRD) analysis of compound 1 revealed 2D layers of chains of UO₈ and CuO₄(H₂O)₂ units that were connected through the phthalate ligands. In compound 2 , these sheets were connected to each other through the two additional carboxylate arms of the pyromellitate, thus resulting in a 3D open‐framework with 1D channels that trapped water molecules. Upon heating, free and bonded water species (from Cu? OH₂) were evacuated from the structure. This thermal transition was followed by in situ XRD and IR spectroscopy. Heating induced a solid‐state topotactic transformation with the formation of a new set of Cu? O interactions in the crystalline anhydrous structure ( 2′ ), in order to keep the square‐planar environment around the copper centers. The structure of compound 3 was built up from trinuclear motifs, in which one copper center, CuO₄(OH₂)₂, was linked to two uranium units, UO₅(H₂O)₂. The assembly of this trimer, “U₂Cu”, with the mellitate generated a 3D network. Complex 4 contained a tetranuclear uranyl core of UO₅(OH)₂ and UO₆(OH) units that were linked to two copper centers, CuO(OH)₂(H₂O)₂, which were then connected to each other through isophthalate ligands and U?O? Cu interactions to create a 3D structure. The common structural feature of these different compounds is a bridging oxo group of U?O? Cu type, which is reflected by apical Cu? O distances in the range 2.350(3)–2.745(5) Å. In the case of a shorter Cu? O distance, a slight lengthening of the uranyl bond (U?O) is observed (e.g., 1.805(3) Å in complex 4 ).