Students’ perceived sociomathematical norms: The missing paradigm

This study proposes a framework for research which takes into account three aspects of sociomathematical norms: teachers’ endorsed norms, teachers’ and students’ enacted norms, and students’ perceived norms. We investigate these aspects of sociomathematical norms in two elementary school classrooms in relation to mathematically based and practically based explanations. Results indicate that even when the observed enacted norms are in agreement with the teachers’ endorsed norms, the students may not perceive these same norms. These results highlight the need to consider the students’ perspective when investigating sociomathematical norms.     

Elementary and middle grade students’ constructions of typicality

This study addresses the measures chosen by students when selecting or constructing indices to properties of distributions of data. A series of individual teaching experiments were conducted to provide insight into the development of five 4th to 8th grade students’ conceptualizations of distribution over the course of 8 weeks of instruction. During the course of the teaching experiment (emergent) statistical tasks and analogous teacher activities were created and refined in an effort to support the development of understanding. In the process of development, attempts were made by students to coordinate center and variability when constructing measures to index properties of distributions. The results indicate that consideration of representativeness was a major factor that motivated modification of approaches to constructing indices of distributions, and subsequent coordination of indices of variation and center. In particular, the defining features of student's self-constructed “typical” values and notions of spread were examined, resulting in a model of development constituting eight “categories” ranging from the construction of values that did not reflect properties of the data (Category 1) to measures employing conceptual use of the mean in combination with other indices of center and spread (Category 8).     

High school students’ understanding of the function concept

This paper is a study of part of the Algebra Project's program for underrepresented high school students from the lowest quartile of academic achievement, social and economic status. The study focuses on students’ learning the concept of function. The curriculum and pedagogy are part of an innovative, experimental approach designed and implemented by the Algebra Project. The instructional treatment took place over 7 weeks during the Junior Year of 15 students from our target population. Immediately after instruction, a written instrument was administered followed, several weeks later, by in-depth interviews. The results are that many of our participants achieved a level of knowledge and understanding of functions on a par with beginning college students, including preservice teachers, as reported in the literature. Many conceptual difficulties that have been reported in the research literature were not as prevalent for our participants and some of them were capable of solving difficult problems involving composition of functions. We conclude that, with appropriate pedagogy, it is possible for students in the Algebra Project's target population to learn substantial and non-trivial mathematics at the high school level, and that the Algebra Project approach is one example of such a pedagogy.     

Equation structure and the meaning of the equal sign: The impact of task selection in eliciting elementary students’ understandings

This paper reports results from a written assessment given to 290 third-, fourth-, and fifth-grade students prior to any instructional intervention. We share and discuss students’ responses to items addressing their understanding of equation structure and the meaning of the equal sign. We found that many students held an operational conception of the equal sign and had difficulty recognizing underlying structure in arithmetic equations. Some students, however, were able to recognize underlying structure on particular tasks. Our findings can inform early algebra efforts by highlighting the prevalence of the operational view and by identifying tasks that have the potential to help students begin to think about equations in a structural way at the very beginning of their early algebra experiences.     

Supporting the development of algebraic thinking in middle school: a closer look at students’ informal strategies

This study investigated how 31 sixth-, seventh-, and eighth-grade middle school students who had not previously, nor were currently taking a formal Algebra course, approached word problems of an algebraic nature. Specifically, these algebraic word problems were of the form x + (x + a) + (x + b) = c or ax + bx + cx = d. An examination of students’ understanding of the relationships expressed in the problems and how they used this information to solve problems was conducted. Data included the students’ written responses to problems, field notes of researcher-student interactions while working on the problems, and follow-up interviews. Results showed that students had many informal strategies for solving the problems with systematic guess and check being the most common approach. Analysis of researcher-student interactions while working on the problems revealed ways in which students struggled to engage in the problems. Support mechanisms for students who struggle with these problems are suggested. Finally, implications are provided for drawing upon students’ informal and intuitive knowledge to support the development of algebraic thinking.     

Leveraging interdiscursivity to support elementary students in bridging the empirical-deductive gap: the case of parity

Research has recognized deductive reasoning as challenging but not impossible for young mathematics learners. In this paper, we present a learning environment developed to assist elementary-school students to bridge the empirical-deductive gap in the context of parity of numbers. Using the commognitive framework, we construe the empirical-deductive gap as part of a broader divide between two discourses that abide by different rules of a “mathematical game”: a discourse on specific numbers and a discourse on numeric patterns. Interdiscursivity is leveraged as a mechanism for instructional design, where students’ familiar routines with specific numbers are teased out and advanced to make sense in the new discourse. We mobilize this mechanism to create opportunities for students to play an active role in recognizing issues with empirical reasoning and generating deductive arguments to establish the validity of universal statements. The environment is illustrated with a small group of 8-year-olds who learned to justify deductively that “odd + odd = even”.     

Expanding the Role of K‐5 Science Instruction in Educational Reform: Implications of an Interdisciplinary Model for Integrating Science and Reading

Addressed is the current practice in educational reform of reducing time for science instruction in favor of traditional reading/language arts instruction. In contrast, presented is an evidence‐based rationale for increasing instructional time for K‐5 science instruction as an educational reform initiative. Overviewed are consensus interdisciplinary research and complementary multi‐year findings of the Science IDEAS model demonstrating the effectiveness of integrating conceptually‐relevant reading within science instruction in improving student achievement in both science and reading comprehension. Based on research summarized, increasing time for integrated K‐5 science is advocated as a meaningful reform‐based approach to science learning and reading comprehension proficiency that, in turn, better prepares students for subsequent success in science and content‐area reading comprehension across upper elementary and middle school grades (3–8).