Ruthenium heterocyclic thiolate complexes: CpRu(L)(L′)SR, [L = L′ = PPh3, 1/2 dppm, 1/2 dppe; L = PPh3, L′ = CO]

The synthesis and characterization of several new ruthenium complexes containing heterocyclic thiolate ligands are described. CpRu(PPh₃)₂Cl reacts with thiolate anions to give CpRu(PPh₃)₂SR, (1) [R = 2-mercaptobenzimidazolyl (a), 2-mercaptobenzothiazolyl (b), and 2-mercaptobenzoxazolyl (c)] in good yields. The CpRu(PPh₃)-(CO)SR (2) complexes are obtained by treating (1) with CO gas in THF at room temperature. The one-pot reaction of CpRu(PPh₃)₂Cl, thiolate anions with chelate bisphosphine ligands (P–P), gave CpRu(P–P)SR where P–P = Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂ (dppm) (3); Ph₂PCH₂CH₂PPh₂ (dppe) (4).     

Complexes of (ω-diphenylphosphinoalkyl)diphenylphosphine sulfides with silver nitrate in pyridine

The behavior of the phosphine-phosphine sulfide complexes of silver, [Ph₂P(S)(CH₂) _n PPh₂] _m ·AgNO₃ (n=2 or 4;m=1 or 2), in pyridine was studied. Dissolution of the 1:1 complexes in pyridine leads to destruction of their dimeric structures Ag₂[Ph₂P(S)(CH₂) _n PPh₂]₂(NO₃)₂ (A) to form the complexes Agp_y ⁺−P(Ph₂)(CH₂) _n Ph₂P=S and Agp_y ⁺−S=PPh₂(CH₂) _n PPh₂. The solid complexes isolated from pyridine restore dimeric structure A. According to the data of X-ray diffraction analysis, the 1:2 complex isolated from pyridine has the structure [S=P(Ph₂)(CH₂)₂(Ph₂)P−(NO₃)Ag(Py)−P(Ph₂) (CH₂)₂(Ph₂)P=S]Py. According to the data of IR spectroscopy, dissolution of this complex in chloroform leads to the formation of the dimeric structure Ag₂Ph₂P(S)(CH₂)₂PPh₂]₄(NO₃)₂. Deceased. Translated fromIzvestiya Akademii Nauk. Seriya Khimicheskaya, No. 9, pp. 1751–1758, September, 1998.     

Pyridine- and pyrimidine-2-thiolate complexes of ruthenium

A series of mononuclear ruthenium complexes containing pyridine- and pyrimidine-2-thiolato ligands was prepared and characterized. The new compounds of general formula CpRu(PPh₃)(κ²S,N-SR) (1) (SR = pyridine-2-thiolate (a), pyrimidine-2-thiolate (b)) were prepared directly by reacting the thiolato anions (RS⁻) with CpRu(PPh₃)₂Cl. Complexes 1 readily react with NOBF₄ or CO in THF at room temperature to give [CpRu(PPh₃)(NO)(κ¹S-HSR)][BF₄]₂ (2) and CpRu(PPh₃)(CO)(κ¹S-SR) (3), respectively. The one-pot reaction of CpRu(PPh₃)₂Cl, thiolato anions and bis(diphenylphosphino)ethane (dppe) gave CpRu(dppe)(κ¹S-SR) [dppe: Ph₂PCH₂CH₂PPh₂ (4)]. The complex salts, [CpRu(PPh₃)₂(κ¹S-HSR)]BPh₄ (5) are prepared by mixing CpRu(PPh₃)₂Cl, HSR and NaBPh₄ at room temperature. The structures of CpRu(PPh₃)(κ²S,N-Spy) (1a), [CpRu(PPh₃)(NO)(κ¹S-HSpy)][BF₄]₂ (2a) and CpRu(PPh₃)(CO)(κ¹S-Spy) (3a), (py = C₅H₄N) have been determined.     

Kristallstrukturelle,Festkörper‐31P‐CP/MAS‐NMR,TOSS, 31P‐COSY‐NMR und mechanistische Beiträge zur Koordinationschemie des Octacarbonyldicobalts mit den Liganden Bis(diphenylphosphanyl)amin,Bis(diphenylphosphanyl)methan und 1,1,1‐Tris(diphenylphosphanyl)ethan

Chemistry of Polyfunctional Molecules. 133. X‐Ray Crystal Structural, Solid‐state ³¹P CP/MAS NMR, TOSS, ³¹P COSY NMR, and Mechanistic Contributions to the Co‐ordination Chemistry of Octacarbonyldicobalt with the Ligands Bis(diphenylphosphanyl)amine, Bis(diphenylphosphanyl)methane, and 1,1,1‐Tris(diphenylphosphanyl)ethane Co₂(CO)₈ reacts with bis(diphenylphosphanyl)amine, HN(PPh₂)₂ (Hdppa, 1 ), in two steps to afford the known compound [Co(CO)(Hdppa‐κ²P)₂][Co(CO)₄] · 2 THF ( 6 a · 2 THF). The intermediate [Co(CO)₂(Hdppa‐κ²P) · (Hdppa‐κP)][Co(CO)₄] · dioxane · n‐pentane ( 5 · dioxane · n‐pentane) was isolated for the first time and was characterized by X‐ray analysis. The cation 5 ⁺ exhibits a slightly distorted trigonal‐bipyramidal geometry. Detailed ³¹P‐NMR investigations (solid‐state CP/MAS NMR, TOSS, ³¹P‐COSY, ³¹P‐EXSY) showed that the additional tautomer [Co(CO)₂(Hdppa‐κ²P)(Ph₂P–N=P(H)Ph₂‐κP)]⁺ ( 5 ′⁺) is present in solution. The tautomer equilibrium is slow in the NMR time scale. In contrast to the solid state only tetragonal pyramidal species of 5 are found in solution. At –90 °C there is slow exchange between the three diastereomeric species 5 a ⁺– 5 c ⁺. Compound 5 forms [Co(CO) · (Hdppa‐κ²P)₂]BPh₄ · THF ( 6 b · THF) in THF with NaBPh₄ under CO‐Elimination. A X‐ray diffraction investigation shows that the cation 6 ⁺ consists of a slightly distorted trigonal‐bipyramidal co‐ordination polyeder. However, a distorted tetragonal‐pyramidal structure has been found for the cation 7 ⁺ of the related compound [Co(CO)(dppm)₂][Co(CO)₄] · 2 THF ( 7 · 2 THF; dppm = bis(diphenylphosphanyl)methane, Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂). A comparison with the known [8] trigonal‐bipyramidal stereoisomer, ascertained for 7 ⁺ of the solvent‐free 7 , is described. In solutions of 6 a · 2 THF and 7 · 2 THF ¹³C{¹H}‐ and ³¹P{¹H}‐NMR spectra indicate an exchange of all CO and organophosphane molecules between cobalt(I) cation and cobalt(–I) anion. A concerted mechanism for the exchange process is discussed. CO elimination leads to discontinuance of the cyclic mechanism by forming binuclear substitution products such as the isolated Co₂(CO)₂ · (μ‐CO)₂(μ‐dppm)₂ · 0.83 THF ( 8 · 0.83 THF), which was characterized by spectroscopy and X‐ray analysis. For the dissolved [Co(CO)₂CH₃C(CH₂PPh₂)₃][Co(CO)₄] · 0.83 n‐pentane ( 9 a · 0.83 n‐pentane) no CO and triphos exchange processes between the cation and the anion are observed. Metathesis of 9 a · 0.83 n‐pentane with NaBPh₄ yields [Co(CO)₂CH₃C(CH₂PPh₂)₃]BPh₄ ( 9 b ) which has been characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray analysis. The cation shows a small distorted tetragonal‐pyramidal structure.     

Synthesis of transition-metal Lewis acid adducts of trans-[ReCl(CNR)(Ph2PCH2CH2PPh2)2] (R = alkyl). A chemical and a quantum-chemical study of electrophilic β-addition to ligating isocyanide

Treatment of trans-[ReCl(CNR)(dppe)₂] (R = Me or Bu^t, dppe = Ph₂PCH₂CH₂ PPh₂) with CoCl₂(THF)_1.5, [ReOCl₃(PPh₃)₂] or [WCl₄L₂] (L = PPh₃ or PEtPh₂) affords the dinuclear adducts [ReCl(CN(M)R)(dppe)₂] (M = CoCl₂(THF), ReOCl₃(PPh₃) or WCl₄L, respectively) (formed via electrophilic β-addition of the electron-acceptor molecules to the isocyanide ligands), which undergo dissociation oxidation (for M = CoCl₂(THF) or ReOCl₃(PPh₃)). These reactions are considered in the light of results of extended Hückel calculations.     

Ruthenium piano-stool complexes bearing imidazole-based PN ligands

A variety of piano-stool complexes of cyclopentadienyl ruthenium(II) with imidazole-based PN ligands have been synthesized starting from the precursor complexes [CpRu(C₁₀H₈)]PF₆, [CpRu(NCMe)₃]PF₆ and [CpRu(PPh₃)₂Cl]. PN ligands used are imidazol-2-yl, -4-yl and -5-yl phosphines.Depending on the ligand and precursor different types of coordination modes were observed; in the case of polyimidazolyl PN ligands these were κ¹P-monodentate, κ²P,N-, κ²N,N- and κ³N,N,N- chelating and μ-κP:κ²N,N-brigding. The solid-state structures of [CpRu(1a)₂Cl ]·H₂O (5^.H₂O) and [{CpRu(μ-κ²-N,N-κ’¹-P-2b)}₂](C₆H₅PO₃H)₂(C₆H₅PO₃H₂)_2, a hydrolysis product of the as well determined [{CpRu(2b)}₂](PF₆)₂^.2CH₃CN (7b^.2CH₃CN) were determined (1a = imidazol-2-yldiphenyl phosphine, 2b = bis(1-methylimidazol-2-yl)phenyl phosphine, 3a = tris(imidazol-2-yl)phosphine). Furthermore, the complexes [CpRu(L)₂]PF₆ (L = imidazol-2-yl or imidazol-4-yl phosphine) have been screened for their catalytic activity in the hydration of 1-octyne.     

Platinum,iridium and rhodium complexes with substituted bis-(diphenylphosphino)methane ligands Ph2PCH(R)PPh2 (R = Me,Ph or SiMe3)

Substituted phosphines of the type Ph₂PCH(R)PPh₂ and their Pt^II complexes [PtX₂{Ph₂PCH(R)PPh₂}] (R = Me, Ph or SiMe₃; X = halide) were prepared. Treatment of [PtCl₂(NCBu^t)₂] with Ph₂PCH(SiMe₃)-PPh₂ gave [PtCl₂(Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂)], while treatment with Ph₂PCH(Ph)PPh₂ gave [Pt{Ph₂PCH(Ph)PPh₂}₂]Cl₂. Reaction of p-MeC₆H₄C≡CLi or PhC≡CLi with [PtX₂{Ph₂PCH(Me)PPh₂}] gave [Pt(C≡CC₆H₄Me-p)₂-{Ph₂PCH(Me)PPh₂}] (X = I) and [Pt{Ph₂PC(Me)PPh₂}₂](X = Cl),while reaction of p-MeC₆H₄C≡CLi with [Pt{Ph₂PCH(Ph)PPh₂}₂]Cl₂ gave [Pt{Ph₂PC(Ph)PPh₂}₂]. The platinum complexes [PtMe₂(dpmMe)] or [Pt(CH₂)₄(dpmMe)] fail to undergo ring-opening on treatment with one equivalent of dpmMe [dpmMe = Ph₂PCH(Me)PPh₂]. Treatment of [Ir(CO)Cl(PPh₃)₂] with two equivalents of dpmMe gave [Ir(CO)(dpmMe)₂]Cl. The PF₆ salt was also prepared. Treatment of [Ir(CO)(dpmMe)₂]Cl with [Cu(C≡CPh)₂], [AgCl(PPh₃)] or [AuCl(PPh₃)] failed to give heterobimetallic complexes. Attempts to prepare the dinuclear rhodium complex [Rh₂(CO)₃(μ-Cl)(dpmMe)₂]BPh₄ using a procedure similar to that employed for an analogous dpm (dpm = Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂) complex were unsuccessful. Instead, the mononuclear complex [Rh(CO)(dpmMe)₂]BPh₄ was obtained. The corresponding chloride and PF₆ salts were also prepared. Attempts to prepare [Rh(CO)(dpmMe)₂]Cl in CHCl₃ gave [RhHCl(dpmMe)₂]Cl. Recrystallization of [Rh(CO)(dpmMe)₂]BPh₄ from CHCl₃/EtOH gave [RhO₂(dpmMe)₂]BPh₄. Treatment of [Rh(CO)₂Cl₂]₂ with one equivalent of dpmMe per Rh atom gave two compounds, [Rh(CO)(dpmMe)₂]Cl and a dinuclear complex that undergoes exchange at room temperature between two formulae: [Rh₂(CO)₂(μ-Cl)(μ-CO)(dpmMe)₂]Cl and [Rh₂(CO)₂-(μ-Cl)(dpmMe)₂]Cl. This revised version was published online in June 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

Reagents for Organic Synthesis : Vol. 5; by M. Fieser and L.F. Fieser,Wiley-Interscience,New York/London/Sydney/Toronto, 1975, 864 pages, $32.15, £16.15.

Phosphorus-31 NMR and X-ray crystallography show that the two similar chelating triphosphine ligands PhP(CH₂CH₂PPh₂)₂(2,2-P₃) and PhP(CH₂CH₂CH₂ PPh₂)₂(33-P₃) form cobalt(I) complexes having trigonal-bipyramidal and square-pyramidal structures, respectively. The structures and PP coupling constants of [Co(33-P₃)(P(OMe)₃)CO]BF₄·1THF and [Co(22-P₃)(P(OMe)₃)₂]BF₄ are given, and the change from square-pyramidal geometry in [Co(33-P₃)P(OMe)₃)CO]⁺ to trigonal-bipyramidal in [Co(22-P₃)(P(OMe)₃)₂]⁺ may be rationalized in terms of a decreased “chelate bite angle” for the PhP(CH₂CH₂PPh₂)₂ ligand.     

Reactions of cationic rhodium(I) carbonyl compounds with nucleophiles to form alkoxo,carboalkoxy and carboxylato complexes. Part II

Summary The rhodium(I) carbonyl compounds [Rh(CO)L₂2] [BF₄]. 1/2CH₂Cl_nn2 (L = PPh₂ or AsPh₃) react with the nucleophiles OMe⁻, RCOO⁻ (R = Me, Et) under nitrogen to form [Rh(OR)(CO)L₂] (1)–(2) and [Rh(OOCR)(CO)L₂] (7)–(₁₀), respectively. Addition of [Rh(CO)₂(PPh₃)₂]-[BF ₄] to OMe⁻ under nitrogen produces [Rh(COOMe)-(CO) (PPh₃)₂]-MeOH (3), whilst reactions of [Rh(CO)-(PPh₃)₂] [BF₄]·1/2CH₂Cl₂ and [Rh(CO)₂(PPh₃)₂] [BF₄] with OR_- (R = Me, Et or n-Pr) in the presence of CO produce [Rh(COOR)(CO)₂(PPh₃)₂] (4)–(6). The products have been characterised by i.r., ¹H, ³¹P, ¹³Cn.m.r. spectroscopy and elemental analysis.     

Cyclopentadienyl Ruthenium(II) Complexes with Bridging Alkynylphosphine Ligands: Synthesis and Electrochemical Studies

The reaction of [CpRuCl(PPh₃)₂] (Cp=cyclopentadienyl) and [CpRuCl(dppe)] (dppe=Ph₂PCH₂CH₂PPh₂) with bis‐ and tris‐phosphine ligands 1,4‐(Ph₂PC≡C)₂C₆H₄ ( 1 ) and 1,3,5‐(Ph₂PC≡C)₃C₆H₃ ( 2 ), prepared by Ni‐catalysed cross‐coupling reactions between terminal alkynes and diphenylchlorophosphine, has been investigated. Using metal‐directed self‐assembly methodologies, two linear bimetallic complexes, [{CpRuCl(PPh₃)}₂(μ‐dppab)] ( 3 ) and [{CpRu(dppe)}₂(μ‐dppab)](PF₆)₂ ( 4 ), and the mononuclear complex [CpRuCl(PPh₃)(η¹‐dppab)] ( 6 ), which contains a “dangling arm” ligand, were prepared (dppab=1,4‐bis[(diphenylphosphino)ethynyl]benzene). Moreover, by using the triphosphine 1,3,5‐tris[(diphenylphosphino)ethynyl]benzene (tppab), the trimetallic [{CpRuCl(PPh₃)}₃(μ₃‐tppab)] ( 5 ) species was synthesised, which is the first example of a chiral‐at‐ruthenium complex containing three different stereogenic centres. Besides these open‐chain complexes, the neutral cyclic species [{CpRuCl(μ‐dppab)}₂] ( 7 ) was also obtained under different experimental conditions. The coordination chemistry of such systems towards supramolecular assemblies was tested by reaction of the bimetallic precursor 3 with additional equivalents of ligand 2 . Two rigid macrocycles based on cis coordination of dppab to [CpRu(PPh₃)] were obtained, that is, the dinuclear complex [{CpRu(PPh₃)(μ‐dppab)}₂](PF₆)₂ ( 8 ) and the tetranuclear square [{CpRu(PPh₃)(μ‐dppab)}₄](PF₆)₄ ( 9 ). The solid‐state structures of 7 and 8 have been determined by X‐ray diffraction analysis and show a different arrangement of the two parallel dppab ligands. All compounds were characterised by various methods including ESIMS, electrochemistry and by X‐band ESR spectroscopy in the case of the electrogenerated paramagnetic species.     

Facile formation of exo-nido→closo-rearrangement products upon the replacement of PPh3 ligands with bis(diphenylphosphino)alkanes in “three-bridge” ruthenacarborane 5,6,10-[RuCl(PPh3)2]-5,6,10-(μ-H)3-10-H-exo-nido-7,8-C2B9H8

The replacement of the PPh₃ ligands in “three-bridge” exo-nido-ruthenacarborane 5,6,10-[RuCl(PPh₃)₂]-5,6,10-(μ-H)₃-10-H-exo-nido-7,8-C₂B₉H₈ with diphosphines, viz., 1,3-bis(diphenylphosphino)propane (dppp) or 1,4-bis(diphenylphosphino)butane (dppb) dramatically decreases the barrier to the thermal exo-nido→closo rearrangement affording the chelate closo-complexes 3,3-[Ph₂P(CH₂)_nPPh₂]-3-H-3-Cl-closo-3,1,2-RuC₂B₉H₁₁ (n = 3 or 4) under mild conditions. In the reaction with dppp, the rearrangement is accompanied by the formation of 17-electron paramagnetic closo-ruthenacarborane 3,3-[Ph₂P(CH₂)₃PPh₂]-3-Cl-closo-3,1,2-RuC₂B₉H₁₁, which could be isolated as the main product when the reaction was carried out at 80 °C. Published in Russian in Izvestiya Akademii Nauk. Seriya Khimicheskaya, No. 11, pp. 2455–2459, November, 2005.     

Synthesis and characterization of stable thiazolylazo anion radical complexes of ruthenium(II)

Two stable thiazolylazo anion radical complexes of ruthenium(II), [Ru(L1^•−)(Cl)(CO)(PPh₃)₂] (1) and [Ru(L2^•−)(Cl)(CO)(PPh₃)₂] (2) (where L1 = 2′-Thiazolylazo-2-imidazole and L2 = 4-(2′-Thiazolylazo)-1-n-hexadecyloxy-naphthalene), have been synthesized and characterized by spectroscopic and electrochemical techniques. The radical nature of the complexes has been confirmed from their room temperature magnetic moments and X-band ESR spectra. The radical complexes display a moderately intense (ε ~ 10⁴ M⁻¹ cm⁻¹) and relatively broad band in 430–460 nm region. In the microcrystalline state, complexes (1) and (2) display strong ESR signals at g = 1.951 and g = 1.988, respectively. In CH₂Cl₂ solution, complexes (1) and (2) show a quasireversible one-electron response near −0.64 and −0.59 V, respectively, versus Ag/AgCl due to the radical redox couple [Ru^II(L)(Cl)(CO)(PPh₃)₂]/[Ru^II (L^•−)(Cl)(CO)(PPh₃)₂].     

Synthesis,characterization and DNA binding studies of two cyclopentadienyl ruthenium(II) complexes with amino acid ligands

Two new half-sandwich cyclopentadienyl ruthenium(II) complexes containing α-amino acids, [CpRu(PPh₃)₂(Ser)] (Ser = l-serine) and [CpRu(PPh₃)(Met)] (Met = l-methionine), were synthesized and characterized by physicochemical methods. Interactions of these two complexes with calf thymus DNA were investigated by UV–Vis absorption spectroscopy, emission spectroscopy and competitive binding studies. The results indicate that both complexes can interact with DNA, leading to the damage of the double helix. [CpRu(PPh₃)₂(Ser)] binds to DNA by intercalation, while the binding mode for [CpRu(PPh₃)(Met)] is more complicated due to the formation of an EB-DNA-complex (EB = ethidium bromide). The affinity of the Met complex for DNA is stronger than that of the Ser complex, which could be due to groove–surface combination or electrostatic interaction in addition to intercalative binding.     

THE REACTIONS OF [MoCl(GeCl3)(CO)3(NCMe)2] WITH NEUTRAL BI- AND TERDENTATE DONOR LIGANDS

Abstract

The reaction of [MoCl(GeCl₃)(CO)₃(NCMe)₂] with an equimolar quantity of L?L {L?L = 2,2′-bipy, 1,10-phen, Ph₂P(CH₂)_nPPh₂ (n = 1 or 2)} in CH₂Cl₂ at room temperature gave either [MoCl(GeCl₃)(CO)₃(L?L)] (L?L = 2,2′-bipy or 1,10-phen) (1 and 2) or [MoCl(GeCl₃)(CO)₂ (NCMe)(L?L)]{L?L = Ph₂P(CH₂)_nPPh₂ (n = 1 or 2) (3 or 4), respectively. Equimolar quantities of [MoCl(GeCl₃)(CO)₂(NCMe){Ph₂P(CH₂)PPh₂}] (3) and L?L {L?L = 2,2′-bipy or Ph₂P(CH)₂PPh₂} react in CH₂Cl₂ at room temperature to afford the cationic complexes [Mo(GeCl₃)(CO)₂{Ph₂P(CH₂) PPh₂}(L?L)]Cl (5 and 6) in good yield. The cationic nature of 6 was established by chloride exchange by reacting Na[BPh₄] with 6 in acetonitrile to give the tetraphenylborate complex [Mo(GeCl₃)(CO)₂{Ph₂P(CH₂)PPh₂}₂][BPh₄] (7). Reaction of equimolar quantities of [MoCl(GeCl₃) (CO)₃(NCMe)₂] and PhP(CH₂CH₂PPh₂)₂ in CH₂Cl₂ at room temperature afforded the dicarbonyl complex [MoCl(GeCl₃)(CO)₂{PhP(CH₂CH₂PPh₂)₂}] (8) in good yield.     

Linked Metal-cluster Systems: Isolation and Characterisation of {anti-[(p-cymene)RuCl]-μ-[κ2-P,P′;κ1-P′′-(PPh2CH2)3CMe]-[AuPt3(CO)3(PCy3)3]}(PF6)2

The new mixed-metal complex {anti-[(p-cymene)RuCl]-μ-[κ ²-P,P′;κ ¹-P′′-(PPh₂CH₂)₃CMe]-[AuCl]}PF₆ and its cluster derivative {anti-[(p-cymene)RuCl]-μ-[κ ²-P,P′;κ ¹-P′′-(PPh₂CH₂)₃CMe]-[AuPt₃(CO)₃(PCy₃)₃]}(PF₆)₂ have been prepared and characterized. Notably, NMR spectroscopy and high resolution FT-ICR mass spectrometry, including a tandem mass spectrometric analysis, demonstrated the formation of these compounds that was also confirmed by single crystal X-ray diffraction analysis.     

Solvent-influenced syntheses and crystal structures of two azido-bridged polynuclear copper(II) complexes derived from 2-[(3-methylaminopropylimino)methyl]phenol with urease inhibitory activities

An end-on azido-bridged dinuclear Cu(II) complex, [Cu₂L₂(μ_1,1–N₃)₂]·CH₃OH, and an end-on azido-bridged polynuclear Cu(II) complex, [CuL(μ_1,1–N₃)]_n, derived from the Schiff base 2-[(3-methylaminopropylimino)methyl]phenol (HL), were synthesized and characterized by physico-chemical and spectroscopic methods. The two complexes were synthesized and crystallized with different solvents, methanol for [Cu₂L₂(μ_1,1–N₃)₂]·CH₃OH and ethanol for [CuL(μ_1,1–N₃)]_n. The Cu atom in each complex is five-coordinate in a square pyramidal geometry with one O and two N atoms of L, and one N atom of an azide ligand defining the basal plane, and with one N atom of another azide ligand occupying the apical position. The urease inhibitory activities of both complexes were evaluated.     

Chloridobis[2‐(diphenylphosphanyl)ethanamine‐κ2P,N](triphenylphosphane‐κP)ruthenium(II) chloride toluene monosolvate

The aminophosphane ligand 1‐amino‐2‐(diphenylphosphanyl)ethane [Ph₂P(CH₂)₂NH₂] reacts with dichloridotris(triphenylphosphane)ruthenium(II), [RuCl₂(PPh₃)₃], to form chloridobis[2‐(diphenylphosphanyl)ethanamine‐κ²P,N](triphenylphosphane‐κP)ruthenium(II) chloride toluene monosolvate, [RuCl(C₁₈H₁₅P)(C₁₄H₁₆NP)₂]Cl·C₇H₈ or [RuCl(PPh₃){Ph₂P(CH₂)₂NH₂}₂]Cl·C₇H₈. The asymmetric unit of the monoclinic unit cell contains two molecules of the Ru^II cation, two chloride anions and two toluene molecules. The Ru^II cation is octahedrally coordinated by two chelating Ph₂P(CH₂)₂NH₂ ligands, a triphenylphosphane (PPh₃) ligand and a chloride ligand. The three P atoms are meridionally coordinated, with the Ph₂P– groups from the ligands being trans. The two –NH₂ groups are cis, as are the chloride and PPh₃ ligands. This chiral stereochemistry of the [RuCl(PPh₃){Ph₂P(CH₂)₂NH₂}₂]⁺ cation is unique in ruthenium–aminophosphane chemistry.     

Transition Metal Chemistry of Diphosphazanes and Diphosphazane Monosulfides

Abstract

The reactions of chiral diphosphazanes. Ph₂PN((S)-*CHMePh)PPhY (Y =Ph, N₂C₃HMe₂-3,5) with [CpRu (PPh₃)₂Cl] and those of the monosulfides, Ph₂PN(R)P(S)Ph₂ (R = (S)-*CHMePh or CHMe₂) with Ru₃(CO)₁₂. [RhCl(cod)]₂ and [RhCI(CO)₂]₂ have been investigated. Molybdenum-palladium heterometallic complexes of the diphosphazanes, MeN(P(OR)₂)₂ (R = CH₂CF₃ or Ph) have been synthesised. Some unusual complexes have been obtained by the reductive carbonylation of cobalt and ruthenium halides in the presence of diphosphazanes, RN(PX₂)₂ (R = Me, X = OCH₂CS or OPh; R = CHMe₂, X = Ph). The structures of the products have been elucidated by NMR spectoscopy and in some cases confirmed by X-ray crystallography (e.g., 1–4).     

Haloalkyl complexes of the transition metals : II. Some new chloromethyl and methoxymethyl complexes of manganese,rhenium and ruthenium

The reactions of Na[Mn(CO)₅] or Na[Mn(CO)₄(PPh₃)] with CH₂ClI yield the new chloromethyl complexes Mn(CO)₅CH₂Cl and Mn(CO)₄(PPh₃)CH₂Cl. Reaction of Na[Re(CO)₅] or Na[CpRu(CO)₂] with ClCH₂OMe yields Re(CO)₅CH₂Cl and CpRu(CO)₂CH₂Cl respectively, in addition to the corresponding methoxymethyl complexes (Cp = η⁵-C₅H₅). Reaction of CpRu(CO)₂CH₂OMe with HCl yields the corresponding chloromethyl complex.     

Rapid binding and activation of small molecules by [MoH4(Ph2PCH2CH2PPh2)2] in the presence of HBF4 · OEt2. Crystal structure of the product obtained with phenylacetylene trans-[MoF(η2-PhCCH)(Ph2PCH2CH2PPh2)2]BF4

In the presence of HBF₄ · OEt₂, [MoH₄(Ph₂PCH₂CH₂PPh₂)₂] exhibits a remarkably rapid and diverse range of reactions with a variety of small molecules. The crystal structure of the product obtained in the presence of phenylacetylene, trans-[MoF(η²-PhCCH)(Ph₂PCH₂CH₂PPh₂)₂]BF₄ is reported.