Polynomial algorithm for sharp upper bound of rainbow connection number of maximal outerplanar graphs

For a finite simple edge-colored connected graph G (the coloring may not be proper), a rainbow path in G is a path without two edges colored the same; G is rainbow connected if for any two vertices of G, there is a rainbow path connecting them. Rainbow connection number, rc(G), of G is the minimum number of colors needed to color its edges such that G is rainbow connected. Chakraborty et al. (2011) [5] proved that computing rc(G) is NP-hard and deciding if rc(G)=2 is NP-complete. When edges of G are colored with fixed number k of colors, Kratochvil [6] proposed a question: what is the complexity of deciding whether G is rainbow connected? is this an FPT problem? In this paper, we prove that any maximal outerplanar graph is k rainbow connected for suitably large k and can be given a rainbow coloring in polynomial time.     

Upper signed domination number

Let G=(V,E) be a graph. A signed dominating function on G is a function f:V→{-1,1} such that for each v∈V, where N[v] is the closed neighborhood of v. The weight of a signed dominating function f is . A signed dominating function f is minimal if there exists no signed dominating function g such that g≠f and g(v)?f(v) for each v∈V. The upper signed domination number of a graph G, denoted by Γ_s(G), equals the maximum weight of a minimal signed dominating function of G. In this paper, we establish an tight upper bound for Γ_s(G) in terms of minimum degree and maximum degree. Our result is a generalization of those for regular graphs and nearly regular graphs obtained in [O. Favaron, Signed domination in regular graphs, Discrete Math. 158 (1996) 287-293] and [C.X. Wang, J.Z. Mao, Some more remarks on domination in cubic graphs, Discrete Math. 237 (2001) 193-197], respectively.     

The rainbow number of matchings in regular bipartite graphs

Given a graph G and a subgraph H of G, let rb(G,H) be the minimum number r for which any edge-coloring of G with r colors has a rainbow subgraph H. The number rb(G,H) is called the rainbow number of H with respect to G. Denote as mK₂ a matching of size m and as B_n,k the set of all the k-regular bipartite graphs with bipartition (X,Y) such that X=Y=n and k≤n. Let k,m,n be given positive integers, where k≥3, m≥2 and n>3(m−1). We show that for every GB_n,k, rb(G,mK₂)=k(m−2)+2. We also determine the rainbow numbers of matchings in paths and cycles.     

Bipartite rainbow numbers of matchings

Given two graphs G and H, let f(G,H) denote the maximum number c for which there is a way to color the edges of G with c colors such that every subgraph H of G has at least two edges of the same color. Equivalently, any edge-coloring of G with at least rb(G,H)=f(G,H)+1 colors contains a rainbow copy of H, where a rainbow subgraph of an edge-colored graph is such that no two edges of it have the same color. The number rb(G,H) is called the rainbow number ofHwith respect toG, and simply called the bipartite rainbow number ofH if G is the complete bipartite graph K_m,n. Erd?s, Simonovits and Sós showed that rb(K_n,K₃)=n. In 2004, Schiermeyer determined the rainbow numbers rb(K_n,K_k) for all n≥k≥4, and the rainbow numbers rb(K_n,kK₂) for all k≥2 and n≥3k+3. In this paper we will determine the rainbow numbers rb(K_m,n,kK₂) for all k≥1.     

Upper bounds on the upper signed total domination number of graphs

Let G=(V,E) be a graph. A function f:V→{−1,+1} defined on the vertices of G is a signed total dominating function if the sum of its function values over any open neighborhood is at least one. A signed total dominating function f is minimal if there does not exist a signed total dominating function g, f≠g, for which g(v)≤f(v) for every v∈V. The weight of a signed total dominating function is the sum of its function values over all vertices of G. The upper signed total domination number of G is the maximum weight of a minimal signed total dominating function on G. In this paper we present a sharp upper bound on the upper signed total domination number of an arbitrary graph. This result generalizes previous results for regular graphs and nearly regular graphs.     

Complete solution for the rainbow numbers of matchings

For a given graph H and a positive n, the rainbow number ofH, denoted by rb(n,H), is the minimum integer k so that in any edge-coloring of K_n with k colors there is a copy of H whose edges have distinct colors. In 2004, Schiermeyer determined rb(n,kK₂) for all n≥3k+3. The case for smaller values of n (namely, ) remained generally open. In this paper we extend Schiermeyer’s result to all plausible n and hence determine the rainbow number of matchings.     

Rainbow number of matchings in planar graphs

The rainbow number$rb(G,H)$ for the graph $H$ in $G$ is defined to be the minimum integer $c$ such that any $c$-edge-coloring of $G$ contains a rainbow $H$. As one of the most important structures in graphs, the rainbow number of matchings has drawn much attention and has been extensively studied. Jendrol et al. initiated the rainbow number of matchings in planar graphs and they obtained bounds for the rainbow number of the matching $k{K}_2$ in the plane triangulations, where the gap between the lower and upper bounds is $O\left(k^3\right)$. In this paper, we show that the rainbow number of the matching $k{K}_2$ in maximal outerplanar graphs of order $n$ is $n+O\left(k\right)$. Using this technique, we show that the rainbow number of the matching $k{K}_2$ in some subfamilies of plane triangulations of order $n$ is $2n+O\left(k\right)$. The gaps between our lower and upper bounds are only $O\left(k\right)$.     

New upper bound for multicolor Ramsey number of odd cycles

Let $r_k\left(C_{2m+1}\right)$ be the $k$-color Ramsey number of an odd cycle $C_{2m+1}$ of length $2m+1$. It is shown that for each fixed $m\ge 2$, $r_k\left(C_{2m+1}\right)<c^k\sqrt{k!}$for all sufficiently large $k$, where $c=c\left(m\right)>0$ is a constant. This improves an old result by Bondy and Erd?s (1973).     

Upper domination and upper irredundance perfect graphs

Let β(G), Γ(G) and IR(G) be the independence number, the upper domination number and the upper irredundance number, respectively. A graph G is called Γ-perfect if β(H) = Γ(H), for every induced subgraph H of G. A graph G is called IR-perfect if Γ(H) =IR(H), for every induced subgraph H of G. In this paper, we present a characterization of Γ-perfect graphs in terms of a family of forbidden induced subgraphs, and show that the class of Γ-perfect graphs is a subclass of IR-perfect graphs and that the class of absorbantly perfect graphs is a subclass of Γ-perfect graphs. These results imply a number of known theorems on Γ-perfect graphs and IR-perfect graphs. Moreover, we prove a sufficient condition for a graph to be Γ-perfect and IR-perfect which improves a known analogous result.     

New upper bound formulas with parameters for Ramsey numbers

In this paper, we obtain some new results R(5,12)?848, R(5,14)?1461, etc., and we obtain new upper bound formulas for Ramsey numbers with parameters.     

On the number of rainbow spanning trees in edge-colored complete graphs

A spanning tree of a properly edge-colored complete graph, $K_n$, is rainbow provided that each of its edges receives a distinct color. In 1996, Brualdi and Hollingsworth conjectured that if $K_{2m}$ is properly $(2m?1)$-edge-colored, then the edges of $K_{2m}$ can be partitioned into $m$ rainbow spanning trees except when $m=2$. By means of an explicit, constructive approach, in this paper we construct $?\sqrt{6m+9}∕3?$ mutually edge-disjoint rainbow spanning trees for any positive value of $m$. Not only are the rainbow trees produced, but also some structure of each rainbow spanning tree is determined in the process. This improves upon best constructive result to date in the literature which produces exactly three rainbow trees.     

树的几何反比度上界

设G(V,E)是一个任意图，定义为G的几何反比度，本文证明了，其中T为顶点数为n的树，这个上界值是精确的     

Complete graphs and complete bipartite graphs without rainbow path

Motivated by Ramsey-type questions, we consider edge-colorings of complete graphs and complete bipartite graphs without rainbow path. Given two graphs $G$ and $H$, the $k$-colored Gallai–Ramsey number $g{r}_k(G:H)$ is defined to be the minimum integer $n$ such that $\left(\genfrac{}{}{0ex}{}{n}{2}\right)\ge k$ and for every $N\ge n$, every rainbow $G$-free coloring (using all $k$ colors) of the complete graph $K_N$ contains a monochromatic copy of $H$. In this paper, we first provide some exact values and bounds of $g{r}_k(P_5:K_t)$. Moreover, we define the $k$-colored bipartite Gallai–Ramsey number $bg{r}_k(G:H)$ as the minimum integer $n$ such that $n^2\ge k$ and for every $N\ge n$, every rainbow $G$-free coloring (using all $k$ colors) of the complete bipartite graph $K_{N,N}$ contains a monochromatic copy of $H$. Furthermore, we describe the structures of complete bipartite graph $K_{n,n}$ with no rainbow $P_4$ and $P_5$, respectively. Finally, we find the exact values of $bg{r}_k(P_4:K_{s,t})$ ($1\le s\le t$), $bg{r}_k(P_4:F)$ (where $F$ is a subgraph of $K_{s,t}$), $bg{r}_k(P_5:K_{1,t})$ and $bg{r}_k(P_5:K_{2,t})$ by using the structural results.