Ligand‐to‐Ligand Charge‐Transfer Transitions of Platinum(II) Complexes with Arylacetylide Ligands with Different Chain Lengths: Spectroscopic Characterization,Effect of Molecular Conformations,and Density Functional Theory Calculations

The complexes [Pt(tBu₃tpy){C?C(C₆H₄C?C)_n?1R}]⁺ (n=1: R=alkyl and aryl (Ar); n=1–3: R=phenyl (Ph) or Ph‐N(CH₃)₂‐4; n=1 and 2, R=Ph‐NH₂‐4; tBu₃tpy=4,4’,4’’‐tri‐tert‐butyl‐2,2’:6’,2’’‐terpyridine) and [Pt(Cl₃tpy)(C?CR)]⁺ (R=tert‐butyl (tBu), Ph, 9,9’‐dibutylfluorene, 9,9’‐dibutyl‐7‐dimethyl‐amine‐fluorene; Cl₃tpy=4,4’,4’’‐trichloro‐2,2’:6’,2’’‐terpyridine) were prepared. The effects of substituent(s) on the terpyridine (tpy) and acetylide ligands and chain length of arylacetylide ligands on the absorption and emission spectra were examined. Resonance Raman (RR) spectra of [Pt(tBu₃tpy)(C?CR)]⁺ (R=n‐butyl, Ph, and C₆H₄‐OCH₃‐4) obtained in acetonitrile at 298 K reveal that the structural distortion of the C?C bond in the electronic excited state obtained by 502.9 nm excitation is substantially larger than that obtained by 416 nm excitation. Density functional theory (DFT) and time‐dependent DFT (TDDFT) calculations on [Pt(H₃tpy)(C?CR)]⁺ (R= n‐propyl (nPr), 2‐pyridyl (Py)), [Pt(H₃tpy){C?C(C₆H₄C?C)_n?1Ph}]⁺ (n=1–3), and [Pt(H₃tpy){C?C(C₆H₄C?C)_n?1C₆H₄‐N(CH₃)₂‐4}]⁺/+H⁺ (n=1–3; H₃tpy=nonsubstituted terpyridine) at two different conformations were performed, namely, with the phenyl rings of the arylacetylide ligands coplanar (“cop”) with and perpendicular (“per”) to the H₃tpy ligand. Combining the experimental data and calculated results, the two lowest energy absorption peak maxima, λ₁ and λ₂, of [Pt(Y₃tpy)(C?CR)]⁺ (Y=tBu or Cl, R=aryl) are attributed to ¹[π(C?CR)→π*(Y₃tpy)] in the “cop” conformation and mixed ¹[d_π(Pt)→π*(Y₃tpy)]/¹[π(C?CR)→π*(Y₃tpy)] transitions in the “per” conformation. The lowest energy absorption peak λ₁ for [Pt(tBu₃tpy){C?C(C₆H₄C?C)_n?1C₆H₄‐H‐4}]⁺ (n=1–3) shows a redshift with increasing chain length. However, for [Pt(tBu₃tpy){C?C(C6H4C?C)_n?1C₆H₄‐N(CH₃)₂‐4}]⁺ (n=1–3), λ₁ shows a blueshift with increasing chain length n, but shows a redshift after the addition of acid. The emissions of [Pt(Y₃tpy)(C?CR)]⁺ (Y=tBu or Cl) at 524–642 nm measured in dichloromethane at 298 K are assigned to the ³[π(C?CAr)→π*(Y₃tpy)] excited states and mixed ³[d_π(Pt)→π*(Y₃tpy)]/³[π(C?C)→π*(Y₃tpy)] excited states for R=aryl and alkyl groups, respectively. [Pt(tBu₃tpy){C?C(C₆H₄C?C)_n?1C₆H₄‐N(CH₃)₂‐4}]⁺ (n=1 and 2) are nonemissive, and this is attributed to the small energy gap between the singlet ground state (S₀) and the lowest triplet excited state (T₁).     

Cross‐Coupling of Organolithium with Ethers or Aryl Ammonium Salts by C−O or C−N Bond Cleavage

Various aryl‐, alkenyl‐, and/or alkyllithium species reacted smoothly with aryl and/or benzyl ethers with cleavage of the inert C?O bond to afford cross‐coupled products, catalyzed by commercially available [Ni(cod)₂] (cod=1,5‐cyclooctadiene) catalysts with N‐heterocyclic carbene (NHC) ligands. Furthermore, the coupling reaction between the aryllithium compounds and aryl ammonium salts proceeded under mild conditions with C?N bond cleavage in the presence of a [Pd(PPh₃)₂Cl₂] catalyst. These methods enable selective sequential functionalizations of arenes having both C?N and C?O bonds in one pot.     

High‐valent Molybdenum Imido Complexes with Tethered Olefins

Against the background of the (propene)Mo(=O)(=NH) and (allyl)Mo(=O)(=NH) surface species suggested as intermediates of the SOHIO process the potential of H₂N–C₆H₄–CH₂– CH=CH–CH₃, ( I ), for the introduction of chelating imido/olefin or imido/allyl ligands at highvalent Mo centres was tested. Reaction of I with Na₂[MoO₄] and trimethylchlorosilane yielded [Cl₂Mo(=N–C₆H₄–CH₂–CH=CH–CH₃)₂(dme)] ( 1 ), containing pendant olefinic arms. All attempts to introduce the olefin into the coordination sphere of the Mo centre failed. The same observation was made with [Cl₂Mo(=O)(=N–C₆H₄–CH₂–CH=CH–CH₃)(dme)] ( 2 ), synthesised via a commutation reaction from 1 and[(dme)Cl₂Mo(=O)₂]. Reaction of three equivalents of I with [CpMoCl_4′] yields [CpCl₂Mo(=N–C₆H₄–CH₂–CH=CH–CH₃)], ( 3 ), again with a pendant olefin arm; the products of experiments aiming at coordinating it to the Mo atom eluded isolation. I thus does not seem suitable for the synthesis of complexes with imido/olefin or imido/allyl ligands. However, products 1 – 3 , (two of which ( 1 , 3 ) were also characterised by single crystal X‐ray diffraction) are nevertheless interesting, e.g., with respect to the grafting of molybdenum complexes on the surfaces of solid supports to obtain heterogeneous oxidation catalysts.     

Synthesis and characterization of new (N‐diphenylphosphino)‐isopropylanilines and their complexes: crystal structure of (Ph2P S)NH?C6H4?4?CH(CH3)2 and catalytic activity of palladium(II) complexes in the Heck and Suzuki cross‐coupling reactions

Three new (N‐diphenylphosphino)‐isopropylanilines, having isopropyl substituent at the carbon 2‐ (1) 4‐ (2) or 2,6‐ (3) were prepared from the aminolysis of chlorodiphenylphosphine with 2‐isopropylaniline, 4‐isopropylaniline or 2,6‐diisopropylaniline, respectively, under anaerobic conditions. Oxidation of 1,2 and 3 with aqueous hydrogen peroxide, elemental sulfur or gray selenium gave the corresponding oxides, sulfides and selenides (Ph₂P?E)NH? C₆H₄? 2‐CH(CH₃)₂, (Ph₂P?E)NH? C₆H₄? 4‐CH(CH₃)₂ and (Ph₂P?E)NH? C₆H₄? 2,6‐{CH(CH₃)₂}₂, where E = O, S, or Se, respectively. The reaction of [M(cod)Cl₂] (M = Pd, Pt; cod = 1,5‐cyclooctadiene) with two equivalents of 1,2 or 3 yields the corresponding monodendate complexes [M((Ph₂P)NH? C₆H₄? 2‐CH(CH₃)₂)₂Cl₂], M = Pd 1d, M = Pt 1e, [M((Ph₂P)NH? C₆H₄? 4‐CH(CH₃)₂)₂Cl₂], M = Pd 2d, M = Pt 2e and [M((Ph₂P)NH? C₆H₄? 2,6‐(CH(CH₃)₂)₂)₂Cl₂], M = Pd 3d, M = Pt 3e, respectively. All the compounds were isolated as analytically pure substances and characterized by NMR, IR spectroscopy and elemental analysis. Furthermore, representative solid‐state structure of [(Ph₂P?S)NH? C₆H₄? 4‐CH(CH₃)₂] (2b) was determined using single crystal X‐ray diffraction technique. The complexes 1d–3d were tested and found to be highly active catalysts in the Suzuki coupling and Heck reaction, affording biphenyls and stilbenes, respectively. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Mononuclear Carbene Dithiolate [Ni(NHX)(′S2C ′)] Complexes with HNX = HNPiPr3 or HNSPh2 Coligands (′S2C ′ 2– = 1,3‐ImidazolidinylN,N′‐bis(2‐benzenethiolate)(2–))

Cleavage reactions of the dinuclear [{Ni(′S₂C ′)}₂] · DMF (′S₂C ′ ^2– = 1,3‐imidazolidinyl‐N,N′‐bis(2‐benzenethiolate)(2–)) with HNPiPr₃ or HNSPh₂ yielded the mononuclear complexes [Ni(NHPiPr₃)(′S₂C ′)] ( 1 ) and [Ni(NHSPh₂)(′S₂C ′)] ( 2 ) which have been completely characterized. The nickel‐carbene‐dithiolate [Ni(′S₂C ′)] moiety is one of the very rare complex fragments that are able to coordinate both HNPR₃ or HNSR₂. IR spectra and X‐ray structure determinations show that 1 and 2 exhibit intramolecular N–H…S(thiolate) hydrogen bonds. Geometric parameters and NMR spectroscopic data of 1 and 2 are compatible with N–X single bonds and ylidic structures of the HNPiPr₃ and HNSPh₂ ligands. Comparison of Ni–N distances in diamagnetic and paramagnetic [Ni(NHSPh₂)] complexes was rendered possible through the X‐ray structure determination of the homoleptic [Ni(NHSPh₂)₆]Cl₂ ( 3 ) which formed as minor by‐product in the synthesis of 2 .     

Transition metal ion complexes of thiosemicarbazones derived from 2-acetylpyridine. Part 5. The4 N-cyclohexyl derivative

Summary Metal ion complexes of the thiosemicarbazone,⁴ N-cyclohexyl-2-[1-(2-pyridinyl)ethylidene]hydrazinecarbothioamide (HL4CH), have been prepared and spectrally characterised. Both the size of the cyclohexyl-group attached at⁴N as well as the⁴N hydrogen affect the stoichiometry and stereochemistry of the isolated complexes. The large cyclohexyl-group evidently causes the isolation of [Fe(HL4CH) (L4CH)H₂O](ClO₄) instead of the expected [Fe(L4CH)₂]ClO₄[Co(L4CH)Br] instead of [Co(HL4CH)Br₂], and [Ni(L4CH)Br] instead of [Ni(HL4CH)₂Br₂]. The presence of the hydrogen at⁴N presumably hinders the deprotonation of HL4CH on complex formation since [Cu(HL4CH)Cl₂] was isolated rather than [CuLCl], which occurs when the thiosemicarbazone has⁴N with two alkyl groups or incorporated in a ring. Further, although we prepared [Ni(L4CH)Br], complexes of this stoichiometry are planar and diamagnetle when⁴N does not have a hydrogen(s) attached to it rather than tetrahedral and paramagnetic as has been found for the present complex.     

Nucleophilic Aromatic Addition Reactions of the Metallabenzenes and Metallapyridinium: Attacking Aromatic Metallacycles with Bis(diphenylphosphino)methane to Form Metallacyclohexadienes and Cyclic η2‐Allene‐Coordinated Complexes

The reactions of phosphonium‐substituted metallabenzenes and metallapyridinium with bis(diphenylphosphino)methane (DPPM) were investigated. Treatment of [Os{CHC(PPh₃)CHC(PPh₃)CH}Cl₂(PPh₃)₂]Cl with DPPM produced osmabenzenes [Os{CHC(PPh₃)CHC(PPh₃)CH}Cl₂{(PPh₂)CH₂(PPh₂)}]Cl ( 2 ), [Os{CHC(PPh₃)CHC(PPh₃)CH}Cl{(PPh₂)CH₂(PPh₂)}₂]Cl₂ ( 3 ), and cyclic osmium η²‐allene complex [Os{CH?C(PPh₃)CH?(η²‐C?CH)}Cl₂{(PPh₂)CH₂(PPh₂)}₂]Cl ( 4 ). When the analogue complex of osmabenzene 1 , ruthenabenzene [Ru{CHC(PPh₃)CHC(PPh₃)CH}Cl₂(PPh₃)₂]Cl, was used, the reaction produced ruthenacyclohexadiene [Ru{CH?C(PPh₃)CH?C(PPh₃)CH}Cl{(PPh₂)CH₂(PPh₂)}₂]Cl₂ ( 6 ), which could be viewed as a Jackson–Meisenheimer complex. Complex 6 is unstable in solution and can easily be convert to the cyclic ruthenium η²‐allene complexes [Ru{CH?C(PPh₃)CH?(η²‐C?CH)}Cl{(PPh₂)CH₂(PPh₂)}₂]Cl₂ ( 7 ) and [Ru{CH?C(PPh₃)CH?(η²‐C?CH)}Cl₂{(PPh₂)CH₂(PPh₂)}₂]Cl ( 8 ). The key intermediates of the reactions have been isolated and fully characterized, further supporting the proposed mechanism for the reactions. Similar reactions also occurred in phosphonium‐substituted metallapyridinium [OsCl₂{NHC(CH₃)C(Ph)C(PPh₃)CH}(PPh₃)₂]BF₄ to give the cyclic osmium η²‐allene‐imine complex [OsCl₂{NH?C(CH₃)C(Ph)?(η²‐C?CH)}{(PPh₂)CH₂(PPh₂)}(PPh₃)]BF₄ ( 11 ).     

Synthesis of Mixed Silylene–Carbene Chelate Ligands from N‐Heterocyclic Silylcarbenes Mediated by Nickel

The Ni^II‐mediated tautomerization of the N‐heterocyclic hydrosilylcarbene L²Si(H)(CH₂)NHC 1 , where L²=CH(C?CH₂)(CMe)(NAr)₂, Ar=2,6‐iPr₂C₆H₃; NHC=3,4,5‐trimethylimidazol‐2‐yliden‐6‐yl, leads to the first N‐heterocyclic silylene (NHSi)–carbene (NHC) chelate ligand in the dibromo nickel(II) complex [L¹Si:(CH₂)(NHC)NiBr₂] 2 (L¹=CH(MeC?NAr)₂). Reduction of 2 with KC₈ in the presence of PMe₃ as an auxiliary ligand afforded, depending on the reaction time, the N‐heterocyclic silyl–NHC bromo Ni^II complex [L²Si(CH₂)NHCNiBr(PMe₃)] 3 and the unique Ni⁰ complex [η²(Si‐H){L²Si(H)(CH₂)NHC}Ni(PMe₃)₂] 4 featuring an agostic Si? H→Ni bonding interaction. When 1,2‐bis(dimethylphosphino)ethane (DMPE) was employed as an exogenous ligand, the first NHSi–NHC chelate‐ligand‐stabilized Ni⁰ complex [L¹Si:(CH₂)NHCNi(dmpe)] 5 could be isolated. Moreover, the dicarbonyl Ni⁰ complex 6 , [L¹Si:(CH₂)NHCNi(CO)₂], is easily accessible by the reduction of 2 with K(BHEt₃) under a CO atmosphere. The complexes were spectroscopically and structurally characterized. Furthermore, complex 2 can serve as an efficient precatalyst for Kumada–Corriu‐type cross‐coupling reactions.     

Transfer hydrogenation of ketones catalyzed by nickel complexes bearing an NHC [CNN] pincer ligand

Four NHC [CNN] pincer nickel (II) complexes, [^iPrCNN (CH₂)₄‐Ni‐Br] ( 5a ), [^nBuCNN (CH₂)₄‐Ni‐Br] ( 5b ), [^iPrCNN (Me)₂‐Ni‐Br] ( 6a ) and [^nBuCNN (Me)₂‐Ni‐Br] ( 6b ), bearing unsymmetrical [C (carbene)N (amino)N (amine)] ligands were synthesized by the reactions of [CNN] pincer ligand precursors 4 with Ni (DME)Cl₂ in the presence of Et₃N. Complexes 5a and 5b are new and were completely characterized. The transfer hydrogenation of ketones catalyzed by the four pincer nickel complexes were explored. Complexes 5a and 6a have better catalytic activity than 5b and 6b . With a combination of NaO^tBu/ⁱPrOH/80 °C and 2% catalyst loading of 5a , 77–98% yields of aromatic alcohols could be obtained.     

Judicious Ligand Design in Ruthenium Polypyridyl CO2 Reduction Catalysts to Enhance Reactivity by Steric and Electronic Effects

A series of Ru^II polypyridyl complexes of the structural design [Ru^II(R?tpy)(NN)(CH₃CN)]²⁺ (R?tpy=2,2′:6′,2′′‐terpyridine (R=H) or 4,4′,4′′‐tri‐tert‐butyl‐2,2′:6′,2′′‐terpyridine (R=tBu); NN=2,2′‐bipyridine with methyl substituents in various positions) have been synthesized and analyzed for their ability to function as electrocatalysts for the reduction of CO₂ to CO. Detailed electrochemical analyses establish how substitutions at different ring positions of the bipyridine and terpyridine ligands can have profound electronic and, even more importantly, steric effects that determine the complexes’ reactivities. Whereas electron‐donating groups para to the heteroatoms exhibit the expected electronic effect, with an increase in turnover frequencies at increased overpotential, the introduction of a methyl group at the ortho position of NN imposes drastic steric effects. Two complexes, [Ru^II(tpy)(6‐mbpy)(CH₃CN)]²⁺ (trans‐[ 3 ]²⁺; 6‐mbpy=6‐methyl‐2,2′‐bipyridine) and [Ru^II(tBu?tpy)(6‐mbpy)(CH₃CN)]²⁺ (trans‐[ 4 ]²⁺), in which the methyl group of the 6‐mbpy ligand is trans to the CH₃CN ligand, show electrocatalytic CO₂ reduction at a previously unreactive oxidation state of the complex. This low overpotential pathway follows an ECE mechanism (electron transfer–chemical reaction–electron transfer), and is a direct result of steric interactions that facilitate CH₃CN ligand dissociation, CO₂ coordination, and ultimately catalytic turnover at the first reduction potential of the complexes. All experimental observations are rigorously corroborated by DFT calculations.     

Characterization of Nα-Fmoc-protected ureidopeptides by electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry (ESI-MS/MS): differentiation of positional isomers

Four pairs of positional isomers of ureidopeptides, FmocNH‐CH(R₁)‐φ(NH‐CO‐NH)‐CH(R₂)‐OY and FmocNH‐CH(R₂)‐φ(NH‐CO‐NH)‐CH(R₁)‐OY (Fmoc = [(9‐fluorenyl methyl)oxy]carbonyl; R₁ = H, alkyl; R₂ = alkyl, H and Y = CH₃/H), have been characterized and differentiated by both positive and negative ion electrospray ionization (ESI) ion‐trap tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS). The major fragmentation noticed in MS/MS of all these compounds is due to ? N? CH(R)? N? bond cleavage to form the characteristic N‐ and C‐terminus fragment ions. The protonated ureidopeptide acids derived from glycine at the N‐terminus form protonated (9H‐fluoren‐9‐yl)methyl carbamate ion at m/z 240 which is absent for the corresponding esters. Another interesting fragmentation noticed in ureidopeptides derived from glycine at the N‐terminus is an unusual loss of 61 units from an intermediate fragment ion FmocNH = CH₂⁺ (m/z 252). A mechanism involving an ion‐neutral complex and a direct loss of NH₃ and CO₂ is proposed for this process. Whereas ureidopeptides derived from alanine, leucine and phenylalanine at the N‐terminus eliminate CO₂ followed by corresponding imine to form (9H‐fluoren‐9‐yl)methyl cation (C₁₄H₁₁⁺) from FmocNH = CHR⁺. In addition, characteristic immonium ions are also observed. The deprotonated ureidopeptide acids dissociate differently from the protonated ureidopeptides. The [M ? H]^? ions of ureidopeptide acids undergo a McLafferty‐type rearrangement followed by the loss of CO₂ to form an abundant [M ? H ? Fmoc + H]^? which is absent for protonated ureidopeptides. Thus, the present study provides information on mass spectral characterization of ureidopeptides and distinguishes the positional isomers. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Chiral Phosphine Ligands from Amino Acids. II. A Facile Synthesis of Phosphinoserines by Nucleophilic Phosphination Reactions – X‐Ray Structure Analyses of Ar2P–CH2–CH(NHBOC)(COOMe) (Ar = Ph,m‐xylyl)

Phosphino derivatives of serine R₂P–CH₂–CH(NHBOC)(COOMe) ( 2 a – 2 d ) have been obtained in high yield by nucleophilic phosphination of N‐(tert.butoxycarbonyl)‐3‐iodo‐L‐alanine methylester with secondary phosphines R₂PH (R = Ph, 2‐tolyl, 3,5‐xylyl, cyclohexyl) in DMF using potassium carbonate as the base. Deprotection of 2 b with HCl affords the amino acid ester hydrochloride [2‐Tol₂P–CH₂–CH(NH₃)(COOMe)]⁺Cl^– ( 3 a ). The X‐ray structures of 2 a (space group P2₁/n) and 2 c (space group P 1) have been determined. The two enantiomers of 2 a or 2 c are interconnected by N–H…O hydrogen bridges forming dimers in the solid state.     

Building up Strain in One Step: Synthesis of an Edge‐Fused Double Silacyclobutene from an Extensively Trichlorosilylated Butadiene Dianion

The exhaustive trichlorosilylation of hexachloro‐1,3‐butadiene was achieved in one step by using a mixture of Si₂Cl₆ and [nBu₄N]Cl (7:2 equiv) as the silylation reagent. The corresponding butadiene dianion salt [nBu₄N]₂[ 1 ] was isolated in 36 % yield after recrystallization. The negative charges of [ 1 ]^2? are mainly delocalized across its two carbanionic (Cl₃Si)₂C termini (α‐effect of silicon) such that the central bond possesses largely C=C double‐bond character. Upon treatment with 4 equiv of HCl, [ 1 ]^2? is converted into neutral 1,2,3,4‐tetrakis(trichlorosilyl)but‐2‐ene, 3 . The Cl^? acceptor AlCl₃, induces a twofold ring‐closure reaction of [ 1 ]^2? to form a six‐membered bicycle 4 in which two silacyclobutene rings are fused along a shared C=C double bond (84 %). Compound 4 , which was structurally characterized by X‐ray crystallography, undergoes partial ring opening to a monocyclic silacyclobutene 2 in the presence of HCl, but is thermally stable up to at least 180 °C.     

Preparation of linear α‐olefins to high‐molecular weight polyethylenes using cationic α‐diimine nickel(II) complexes containing chloro‐substituted ligands

A series of α‐diimine nickel(II) complexes containing chloro‐substituted ligands, [(Ar)N?C(C₁₀H₆)C?N(Ar)]NiBr₂ ( 4a , Ar = 2,3‐C₆H₃Cl₂; 4b , Ar = 2,4‐C₆H₃Cl₂; 4c , Ar = 2,5‐C₆H₃Cl₂; 4d , Ar = 2,6‐C₆H₃Cl₂; 4e , Ar = 2,4,6‐C₆H₂Cl₃) and [(Ar)N?C(C₁₀H₆)C?N(Ar)]₂NiBr₂ ( 5a , Ar = 2,3‐C₆H₃Cl₂; 5b , Ar = 2,4‐C₆H₃Cl₂; 5c , Ar = 2,5‐C₆H₃Cl₂), have been synthesized and investigated as precatalysts for ethylene polymerization. In the presence of modified methylaluminoxane (MMAO) as a cocatalyst, these complexes are highly effective catalysts for the oligomerization or polymerization of ethylene under mild conditions. The catalyst activity and the properties of the products were strongly affected by the aryl‐substituents of the ligands used. Depending on the catalyst structure, it is possible to obtain the products ranging from linear α‐olefins to high‐molecular weight polyethylenes. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 44: 1964–1974, 2006     

Induced Self‐Assembly of Platinum(II) Alkynyl Complexes through Specific Interactions between Citrate and Guanidinium for Proof‐of‐Principle Detection of Citrate and an Assay of Citrate Lyase

Water‐soluble alkynylplatinum(II) terpyridine complexes appended with guanidinium moieties, [Pt(tpy)(C?C?Ar)][OTf]₂ (tpy=terpyridine; OTf=trifluoromethanesulfonate; Ar=C₆H₄‐{NHC(?NH₂⁺)(NH₂)}‐4 ( 1 ), C₆H₄‐{CH₂NHC(?NH₂⁺)(NH₂)}‐4 ( 2 )), and [Pt(tBu₃tpy)(C?CC₆H₄‐{NHC(?NH₂⁺)(NH₂)}‐4)][OTf]₂ ( 3 ; tBu₃tpy=4,4′,4′′‐tri‐tert‐butyl‐2,2′:6′,2′′‐terpyridine), have been synthesized and characterized. The photophysical properties of the complexes have been studied. Based on the results of UV/Vis absorption, resonance light scattering, and dynamic light scattering experiments, in aqueous buffer solutions complexes 1 and 2 undergo aggregation in the presence of citrate through strong and specific electrostatic and hydrogen‐bonding interactions with citrate. The emergence of a triplet metal–metal‐to‐ligand charge transfer (³MMLCT) emission in the near‐infrared (NIR) region brought on by the induced self‐assembly of complex 1 has been demonstrated for proof‐of‐principle detection of citrate with good sensitivity and selectivity over other mono‐ and dicarboxylate substrates in the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle as well as phosphate and lactate anions. Such a good selectivity toward citrate has been rationalized by the high charge density of citrate under physiological conditions and specific interactions between the guanidinium moiety on complex 1 and citrate. Extension of the work to citrate detection in fetal bovine serum and real‐time monitoring of the activity of citrate lyase by the NIR emission of complex 1 have also been demonstrated.     

Bis(N‐acetyltriethylphosphaniminium)‐tetraacetato‐dichloro‐dicuprat(II), [MeC(O)N(H)PEt3]2[Cu2(O2C–Me)4Cl2]

Bis(N‐acetyltriethylphosphaneiminium)‐tetraacetato‐dichloro‐dicuprate(II), [MeC(O)N(H)PEt₃]₂[Cu₂(O₂C–Me)₄Cl₂] The title compound has been prepared by the reaction of Me₃SiNPEt₃ with [Cu₂(O₂C–Me)₄] and MeC(O)Cl in dichloromethane solution to give colourless crystals which include four molecules CH₂Cl₂ per formula unit. The complex is characterized by IR spectroscopy and by a crystal structure determination. [MeC(O)N(H)PEt₃]₂[Cu₂(O₂C–Me)₄Cl₂] · 4 CH₂Cl₂: Space group P2₁/n, Z = 2, lattice dimensions at –70 °C: a = 794.1(1), b = 2356.9(6), c = 1327.3(2) pm; β = 91.00(1)°; R₁ = 0.0597. The structure consists of N‐acetyltriethylphosphaneiminium cations and dianions [Cu₂(O₂C–Me)₄Cl₂]^2– which form an iontriple with N–H…Cl hydrogen bridges.     

Kupfer(I)-Komplexe mit 1-Azadien-Chelatliganden und ihre Reaktion mit Sauerstoff

Copper(I) Complexes with 1-Azadiene Chelate Ligands and Their Reaction with Oxygen The reaction of the bidendate 1-azadiene ligands Me₂N? (CH₂)_n? N?CH? CH?CH? Ph with CuX results in the formation of the dimeric compounds [ A CuX]₂ and [ B CuX]₂ ( A : n = 2, B : n = 3, X: I, Cl). The structure of complex 1 [ A CuI]₂ was determined by X-ray crystal structure analysis. 1 consists of two tetrahedrally coordinated Cu atoms connected by two iodo bridges. (Cu? Cu bond length: 261 pm). The ligand Me? N(CH₂CH₂N?CH? CH?CH? Ph)₂ ( C ) reacts with CuX to form the monomeric complexes [ C CuX] ( 5 : X?I, 6 : X?Cl). The crystal structure of 5 shows that the ligand acts as a tridendate ligand. The bond lengths of the CuN(sp²) bonds are significantly shorter than the Cu? N(sp³) distance. Reacting the podand-type ligands N(CH₂CH₂? N?CH? R)₃ ( D : R?Ph, E : R?-CH?CH? Ph) with CuX yields the ionic complexes 7 [ D Cu][CuCl₂] and 8 [ E Cu][CuCl₂]. 7 was characterized by X-ray analysis which confirmed that D acts as a four-dendate podand ligand. The compounds 1 ? 8 are unreactive towards CO₂ but take up O₂ even at deep temperatures. At ?78°C the orange-red complex 4 [ B CuCl]₂ reacts with O₂ in CH₂Cl₂ to form a deep violet solution, but the primary product of the oxidation could not be isolated. It reacts at room temperature to form the green complex 9 [μ-Cl, μ-OH][ B CuCl]₂. The X-ray structure analysis of 9 confirms that a dimeric Cu^II complex is formed in which both a chloro- and a hydroxo group are bridging the monomeric units. The Cu^II centers exhibit a distorted tetragonal-pyramidal coordination. The pathway of the reaction with O₂ will be discussed.     

Synthesis,IR-spectroscopic study and crystal structure of tris(benzohydrazide)nickel(II) dichloride dihydrate [Ni(L)<Subscript>3</Subscript>]Cl<Subscript>2</Subscript> · 2H<Subscript>2</Subscript>O

Coordination compound [Ni(L)₃]Cl₂ · 2H₂O (L is benzohydrazide) has been synthesized and studied by IR spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction analysis. According to X-ray diffraction, one of the Cl^– ions is disordered over two nonequivalent positions. The crystals are monoclinic, a = 15.423(3) Å, b = 9.697(2) Å, c = 18.893(4) Å, ß = 105.99(3)°, space group P2₁/c, Z = 4. The structural units of the crystal are complex cations [Ni(L)3]2+, in which ligands L are coordinated to the central atom bidentately chelating the metal atoms through the O and N atoms of the hydrazide moiety (Ni–O 2.036(4), 2.051(5), 2.047(5); Ni–N 2.095(5), 2.089(6), 2.097(6) Å). The structural units of the crystal are joined together by cation–anion electrostatic interactions and hydrogen bonds, which involve both H₂O molecules, both Cl^– anions and the N atoms of chelate rings of the complex cation.     

Ligand Effects on the Electronic Structure of Heteroleptic Antimony‐Centered Radicals

We report on the structures of three unprecedented heteroleptic Sb‐centered radicals [L(Cl)Ga](R)Sb^. ( 2‐R , R=B[N(Dip)CH]₂ 2‐B , 2,6‐Mes₂C₆H₃ 2‐C , N(SiMe₃)Dip 2‐N ) stabilized by one electropositive metal fragment [L(Cl)Ga] (L=HC[C(Me)N(Dip)]₂, Dip=2,6‐i‐Pr₂C₆H₃) and one bulky B‐ ( 2‐B ), C‐ ( 2‐C ), or N‐based ( 2‐N ) substituent. Compounds 2‐R are predominantly metal‐centered radicals. Their electronic properties are largely influenced by the electronic nature of the ligands R, and significant delocalization of unpaired‐spin density onto the ligands was observed in 2‐B and 2‐N . Cyclic voltammetry (CV) studies showed that 2‐B undergoes a quasi‐reversible one‐electron reduction, which was confirmed by the synthesis of [K([2.2.2]crypt)][L(Cl)GaSbB[N(Dip)CH]₂] ([K([2.2.2]crypt)][ 2‐B ]) containing the stibanyl anion [ 2‐B ]^?, which was shown to possess significant Sb?B multiple‐bonding character.