An Open‐Cage Fullerene That Mimics the C60H10 (5,5)‐Carbon Nanotube Endcap to Host Acetylene and Hydrogen Cyanide Molecules

Treatment of the open‐cage fullerene C₆₃H₄NO₂(Ph)₂(Py)(N₂C₆H₄) ( 1 ) with methanol at 150 °C results in an orifice‐enlargement reaction to give C₆₉H₈NO(CO₂Me)(Ph)(Py)(N₂C₆H₄) ( 2 ). The overall yield from C₆₀ to isolated 2 is 6.1 % (four steps). Compound 2 contains a 24‐membered elliptic orifice that spans 8.45 Å along the major axis and 6.37 Å along the minor axis. The skeleton of 2 resembles the hypothetic C₆₀H₁₀ (5,5)‐carbon nanotube endcap. The cup‐shaped structure of 2 is able to include water, hydrogen cyanide, and acetylene, forming H₂O@ 2 , HCN@ 2 , and C₂H₂@ 2 , respectively. The molecular structures of H₂O@ 2 and HCN@ 2 have been determined by X‐ray crystallography. The ¹H NMR spectra reveal substantial upfield shifts for the endohedral species, such as δ=?10.30 (for H₂O), ?2.74 and ?14.26 (for C₂H₂), and ?1.22 ppm (for HCN), owing to the strong shielding effects of the fullerene cage.     

Activation of Open‐Cage Fullerenes with Ruthenium Carbonyl Clusters

Reactions of the open‐cage fullerene C₆₃NO₂(Py)(Ph)₂ ( 1 ) with [Ru₃(CO)₁₂] produce [Ru₃(CO)₈(μ,η⁵‐C₆₃NO₂(Py)(Ph)₂)] ( 2 ), [Ru₂H(CO)₃(μ,η⁷‐C₆₃N(Py)(Ph)(C₆H₄))] ( 3 ), and [Ru(CO)(Py)₂₍η³‐C₆₃NO₂(Py)(Ph)₂)] ( 4 ), in which the orifice sizes are modified from 12 to 8, 11, and 15‐membered ring, through ruthenium‐mediated C?O and C?C bond activation and formation.     

Sc2O@Td(19151)‐C76: Hindered Cluster Motion inside a Tetrahedral Carbon Cage Probed by Crystallographic and Computational Studies

A new cluster fullerene, Sc₂O@T_d(19151)‐C₇₆, has been isolated and characterized by mass spectrometry, UV/Vis/NIR absorption, ⁴⁵Sc NMR spectroscopy, cyclic voltammetry, and single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. The crystallographic analysis unambiguously assigned the cage structure as T_d(19151)‐C₇₆, which is the first tetrahedral fullerene cage characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. This study also demonstrated that the Sc₂O cluster has a much smaller Sc?O?Sc angle than that of Sc₂O@C_s(6)‐C₈₂ and the Sc₂O unit is fully ordered inside the T_d(19151)‐C₇₆ cage. Computational studies further revealed that the cluster motion of the Sc₂O is more restrained in the T_d(19151)‐C₇₆ cage than that in the C_s(6)‐C₈₂ cage. These results suggest that cage size affects not only the shapes but also the cluster motion inside fullerene cages.     

Quantum Chemical Insight of the Dimetallic Sulfide Endohedral Fullerene Sc2S@C70: Does It Possess the Conventional D5h Cage?

Like C₆₀, C₇₀ is one of the most representative fullerenes in fullerene science. Even though there are 8149 C₇₀ isomers, only two of them have been found before: the conventional D_5h and an isolated pentagon rule (IPR)‐violating C_2v(7854). Through the use of quantum chemical methods, we report a new unconventional C₇₀ isomer, C₂(7892), which survives in the form of dimetallic sulfide endohedral fullerene Sc₂S@C₇₀. Compared with the IPR‐obeying C₇₀ and the C_2v(7854) fullerene with three pairs of pentagon adjacencies, the C₂(7892) cage violates the isolated pentagon rule and has two pairs of pentagon adjacencies. In Sc₂S@C₂(7892)‐C₇₀, two scandium atoms coordinate with two pentalene motifs, respectively, presenting two equivalent Sc? S bonds. The strong coordination interaction, along with the electron transfer from the Sc₂S cluster to the fullerene cage, results in the stabilization of the non‐IPR endohedral fullerene. The electronic structure of Sc₂S@C₇₀ can be formally described as [Sc₂S]⁴⁺@[C₇₀]^4?; however, a substantial overlap between the metallic orbitals and cage orbitals has also been found. Electrochemical properties and electronic absorption, infrared, and ¹³C NMR spectra of Sc₂S@C₇₀ have been calculated theoretically.     

The Unanticipated Dimerization of Ce@C2v(9)‐C82 upon Co‐crystallization with Ni(octaethylporphyrin) and Comparison with Monomeric M@C2v(9)‐C82 (M = La,Sc, and Y)

We report that Ce@C_2v(9)‐C₈₂ forms a centrosymmetric dimer when co‐crystallized with Ni(OEP) (OEP = octaethylporphyrin dianion). The crystal structure of {Ce@C_2v(9)‐C₈₂}₂?2[Ni(OEP)]?4 C₆H₆ shows that a new C?C bond with a bond length of 1.605(5) Å connects the two cages. The high spin density of the singly occupied molecular orbital (SOMO) on the cage and the pyramidalization of the cage are factors that favor dimerization. In contrast, the treatment of Ni(OEP) with M@C_2v(9)‐C₈₂ (M = La, Sc, and Y) results in crystallization of monomeric endohedral fullerenes. A systematic comparison of the X‐ray structures of M@C_2v(9)‐C₈₂ (M = Sc, Y, La, Ce, Gd, Yb, and Sm) reveals that the major metal site in each case is located at an off‐center position adjacent to a hexagonal ring along the C₂ axis of the C_2v(9)‐C₈₂ cage. DFT calculations at the M06‐2X level revealed that the positions of the metal centers in these metallofullerenes M@C_2v(9)‐C₈₂ (M = Sc, Y, and Ce), as determined by single‐crystal X‐ray structure studies, correspond to an energy minimum for each compound.     

Formation,Dynamic Behavior,and Chemical Transformation of Pt Complexes with a Rotaxane‐like Structure

The reaction of [Pt(CH₂COMe)(Ph)(cod)] (cod=1,5‐cyclooctadiene) with (ArCH₂NH₂CH₂‐C₆H₄COOH)⁺(PF₆)^? (Ar=4‐tBuC₆H₄ or 9‐anthryl) in the presence of cyclic oligoethers such as dibenzo[24]crown‐8 (DB24C8) and dicyclohexano[24]crown‐8 (DC24C8) produces {(ce)[ArCH₂NH₂CH₂C₆H₄COOPt(Ph)(cod)]}⁺(PF₆)^? (ce=DB24C8 or DC24C8, Ar=4‐tBuC₆H₄ or 9‐anthryl) with interlocked structures. FABMS and NMR spectra of a solution of these compounds indicate that the Pt complexes with a secondary ammonium group and DB24C8 (or DC24C8) make up the axis and cyclic components, respectively. Temperature‐dependent ¹H NMR spectra of a solution of {(DB24C8)[4‐tBuC₆H₄CH₂NH₂CH₂‐C₆H₄COOPt(Ph)(cod)]}⁺(PF₆)^? ({(DB24C8)[ 4 ‐H]}⁺(PF₆)^?) show equilibration with free DB24C8 and the axis component. The addition of DB24C8 to a solution of {(DC24C8)[ 4 ‐H]}⁺(PF₆)^? causes partial exchange of the macrocyclic component of the interlocked molecules, giving a mixture of {(DC24C8)[ 4 ‐H]}⁺(PF₆)^?, {(DB24C8)[ 4 ‐H]}⁺(PF₆)^?, and free macrocyclic compounds. The reaction of 3,5‐Me₂C₆H₃COCl with {(DB24C8)[ 4 ‐H]}⁺(PF₆)^? affords the organic rotaxane {(DB24C8)(4‐tBuC₆H₄CH₂NH₂CH₂‐C₆H₄COOCOC₆H₃Me₂‐3,5)}⁺(PF₆)^? through C? O bond formation between the aroyl group and the carboxylate ligand of the axis component. The addition of 2,2′‐bipyridine (bpy) to a solution of {(DB24C8)[ 4 ‐H]}⁺(PF₆)^? induces the degradation of the interlocked structure to form a complex with trigonal bipyramidal coordination, [Pt(Ph)(bpy)(cod)]⁺(PF₆)^?, whereas the reaction of bpy with [Pt(OCOC₆H₄Me‐4)(Ph)(cod)] produces the square‐planar complex [Pt(OCOC₆H₄Me‐4)(Ph)(bpy)].     

The cocrystal rac‐1‐[(N,4‐dimethylbenzenesulfonamido)methyl]‐2‐(diphenylphosphoryl)ferrocene–rac‐1‐[(N,4‐dimethylbenzenesulfonamido)methyl]‐2‐(diphenylphosphanyl)ferrocene (0.45/0.55)

As part of our interest in the synthesis and catalytic applications of chiral (diphenylphosphanyl)ferrocene ligands, we designed a number of P,N‐containing ligands for use in asymmetric transfer hydrogenation (ATH). During the synthetic procedure to obtain rac‐1‐[(N,4‐dimethylbenzenesulfonamido)methyl]‐2‐(diphenylphosphanyl)ferrocene, the title compound, [Fe(C₅H₅)(C₂₆H₂₅NO₂PS)]_0.55·[Fe(C₅H₅)(C₂₆H₂₅NO₃PS)]_0.45, was obtained as a by‐product. It is composed of a ferrocene group disubstituted by a partially oxidized diphenylphosphanyl group, as confirmed by ³¹P NMR analysis, and an (N,4‐dimethylbenzenesulfonamido)methyl substituent. Owing to the partially oxidized diphenylphosphanyl group, it is best to view the crystal as being composed of a mixture of non‐oxidized and oxidized phosphane, so it can be regarded as a cocrystal. It is also a racemate. To the best of our knowledge, the P=O distance [1.344 (4) Å] is the shortest observed for related (diphenylphosphoryl)ferrocene compounds. The packing is stabilized by weak C—H...O interactions, forming R₂²(10) hydrogen‐bonding motifs, which build up a chain along the c axis.     

Three‐Component Self‐Assembly of a Series of Triply Interlocked Pd12 Coordination Prisms and Their Non‐Interlocked Pd6 Analogues

Template‐assisted formation of multicomponent Pd₆ coordination prisms and formation of their self‐templated triply interlocked Pd₁₂ analogues in the absence of an external template have been established in a single step through Pd? N/Pd? O coordination. Treatment of cis‐[Pd(en)(NO₃)₂] with K₃tma and linear pillar 4,4′‐bpy (en=ethylenediamine, H₃tma=benzene‐1,3,5‐tricarboxylic acid, 4,4′‐bpy=4,4′‐bipyridine) gave intercalated coordination cage [{Pd(en)}₆(bpy)₃(tma)₂]₂[NO₃]₁₂ ( 1 ) exclusively, whereas the same reaction in the presence of H₃tma as an aromatic guest gave a H₃tma‐encapsulating non‐interlocked discrete Pd₆ molecular prism [{Pd(en)}₆(bpy)₃(tma)₂(H₃tma)₂][NO₃]₆ ( 2 ). Though the same reaction using cis‐[Pd(NO₃)₂(pn)] (pn=propane‐1,2‐diamine) instead of cis‐[Pd(en)(NO₃)₂] gave triply interlocked coordination cage [{Pd(pn)}₆(bpy)₃(tma)₂]₂[NO₃]₁₂ ( 3 ) along with non‐interlocked Pd₆ analogue [{Pd(pn)}₆(bpy)₃(tma)₂](NO₃)₆ ( 3′ ), and the presence of H₃tma as a guest gave H₃tma‐encapsulating molecular prism [{Pd(pn)}₆(bpy)₃(tma)₂(H₃tma)₂][NO₃]₆ ( 4 ) exclusively. In solution, the amount of 3′ decreases as the temperature is decreased, and in the solid state 3 is the sole product. Notably, an analogous reaction using the relatively short pillar pz (pz=pyrazine) instead of 4,4′‐bpy gave triply interlocked coordination cage [{Pd(pn)}₆(pz)₃(tma)₂]₂[NO₃]₁₂ ( 5 ) as the single product. Interestingly, the same reaction using slightly more bulky cis‐[Pd(NO₃)₂(tmen)] (tmen=N,N,N′,N′‐tetramethylethylene diamine) instead of cis‐[Pd(NO₃)₂(pn)] gave non‐interlocked [{Pd(tmen)}₆(pz)₃(tma)₂][NO₃]₆ ( 6 ) exclusively. Complexes 1 , 3 , and 5 represent the first examples of template‐free triply interlocked molecular prisms obtained through multicomponent self‐assembly. Formation of the complexes was supported by IR and multinuclear NMR (¹H and ¹³C) spectroscopy. Formation of guest‐encapsulating complexes ( 2 and 4 ) was confirmed by 2D DOSY and ROESY NMR spectroscopic analyses, whereas for complexes 1 , 3 , 5 , and 6 single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction techniques unambiguously confirmed their formation. The gross geometries of H₃tma‐encapsulating complexes 2 and 4 were obtained by universal force field (UFF) simulations.     

Nitro‐substituted iron(II) tridentate bis(imino)pyridine complexes as high‐temperature catalysts for the production of α‐olefins

A new series of nitro‐substituted bis(imino)pyridine ligands {2,6‐bis[1‐(2‐methyl‐4‐nitrophenylimino)ethyl]pyridine, 2,6‐bis[1‐(4‐nitrophenylimino)ethyl]pyridine, (1‐{6‐[1‐(4‐nitro‐phenylimino)‐ethyl]‐pyridin‐2‐yl}‐ethylidene)‐(2,4,6‐trimethyl‐phenyl)‐amine, and 2,6‐bis[1‐(2‐methyl‐3‐nitrophenylimino)ethyl]pyridine} and their corresponding Fe(II) complexes [{p‐NO₂? o‐Me? Ph? N?C(Me)? Py? C(Me)?N? Ph? o‐ Me? p‐NO₂}FeCl₂ ( 10 ), L₂FeCl₂ ( 11 ), {m‐NO₂? o‐Me? Ph? N?C(Me)? Py? C(Me)?N? Ph? o‐Me? m‐NO₂}FeCl₂ ( 12 ), and {p‐NO₂? Ph? N?C(Me)? Py? C(Me)?N? Mes}FeCl₂ ( 14 )] were synthesized. According to X‐ray analysis, there were shortenings of the axial Fe? N bond lengths (up to 0.014 Å) in para‐nitro‐substituted complex 10 and (up to 0.015 Å) in meta‐nitro‐substituted complex 12 versus the Fe(II) complex without nitro groups [{o‐Me? Ph? N?C(Me)? Py? C(Me)?N? Ph? o‐Me}FeCl₂ ( 1 )]. Complexes 10 , 12 , and 14 afforded very active catalysts for the production of α‐olefins and were more temperature‐stable and had longer lifetimes than parent non‐nitro‐substituted Fe(II) complex 1 . The reaction between FeCl₂ and a sterically less hindered ligand [p‐NO₂? Ph? N?C(Me)? Py? C(Me)?N? Ph? p‐NO₂] resulted in the formation of octahedral complex 11 . A para‐dialkylamino‐substituted bis(imino)pyridine ligand [p‐NEt₂? o‐Me? Ph? N?C(Me)? Py? C(Me)?N? Ph? o‐Me? p‐NEt₂] and the corresponding Fe(II) complex [{p‐NEt₂? o‐Me? Ph? N?C(Me)? Py? C(Me)?N? Ph? o‐Me? p‐NEt₂}FeCl₂ ( 16 )] were synthesized to evaluate the effect of enhanced electron donation of the ligand on the catalytic performance. According to X‐ray analysis, there was a shortening (up to 0.043 Å) of the axial Fe? N bond lengths in para‐diethylamino‐substituted complex 16 in comparison with parent Fe(II) complex 1 . © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 44: 2615–2635, 2006     

La2@Cs(17 490)‐C76: A New Non‐IPR Dimetallic Metallofullerene Featuring Unexpectedly Weak Metal–Pentalene Interactions

Although all the pure‐carbon fullerene isomers above C₆₀ reported to date comply with the isolated pentagon rule (IPR), non‐IPR structures, which are expected to have different properties from those of IPR species, are obtainable either by exohedral modification or by endohedral atom doping. This report describes the isolation and characterization of a new endohedral metallofullerene (EMF), La₂@C₇₆, which has a non‐IPR fullerene cage. The X‐ray crystallographic result for the La₂@C₇₆/[Ni^II(OEP)] (OEP=octaethylporphyrin) cocrystal unambiguously elucidated the C_s(17 490)‐C₇₆ cage structure, which contains two adjacent pentagon pairs. Surprisingly, multiple metal sites were distinguished from the X‐ray data, which implies dynamic behavior for the two La³⁺ cations inside the cage. This dynamic behavior was also corroborated by variable‐temperature ¹³⁹ La NMR spectroscopy. This phenomenon conflicts with the widely accepted idea that the metal cations in non‐IPR EMFs invariably coordinate strongly with the negatively charged fused‐pentagon carbons, thereby providing new insights into modern coordination chemistry. Furthermore, our electrochemical and computational studies reveal that La₂@C_s(17 490)‐C₇₆ has a larger HOMO–LUMO gap than other dilanthanum‐EMFs with IPR cage structures, such as La₂@D_3h(5)‐C₇₈ and La₂@I_h(7)‐C₈₀, which implies that IPR is no longer a strict rule for EMFs.     

Halogen‐Bond‐Assisted Guest Inclusion in a Synthetic Cavity

The confined space inside a self‐assembled cage enhanced halogen bonding (XB) between iodoperfluorocarbons (XB donors) and NO₃^? anions or H₂O molecules (XB acceptors), as confirmed by NMR spectroscopy in solution and by X‐ray crystallography in the solid state. The cavity also bound an XB donor–acceptor pair, C₆F₃I₃ and C₆H₅NMe₂, in a selective pairwise fashion.     

Synthesis and Crystal Structure of [(1‐(Phenyltriazenido)‐2‐(phenyltriazeno)benzene)(nitrato)mercury(II)], {Hg[PhN3C6H4N3(H)Ph](NO3)}, a Complex with Weak Metal‐Arene π‐Interactions

The reaction of PhN₃(H)C₆H₄N₃(H)Ph with Hg(NO₃)₂ in THF in the presence of triethylamine yields {Hg[PhN₃C₆H₄N₃(H)Ph](NO₃)} as a yellow powder that can be recrystallized from THF/acetone. The crystals belong to the monoclinic system, space group P2₁ with the cell dimensions a = 9.639(2), b = 5.412(1), c = 19.675(4) Å, β= 97.47(3)°, V = 1017.7 (4) ų, Z = 2. The crystal structure determination (2668 unique reflections with [I>2σ(I)], 262 parameters, R₁ = 0.0393) shows that the structure consists of mononuclear complexes. Hg atoms are linearly coordinated by one N_α atom of the triazenide unit of the planar ligand [Hg‐N(1) = 2.101(8) Å] and an O atom of the NO₃^— ion [Hg‐O(1) = 2.11(1) Å]. Additional weak Hg‐N contacts [Hg‐N(4) = 2.662(9) and Hg‐N(3) = 2.851(9) Å] and an intramolecular hydrogen bond between the triazenide hydrogen and an O atom of the nitrate group are observed [N(6)‐H(6)···O(2) = 2.92(2) Å]. The complexes are stacked to infinite chains by metal‐arene π‐interactions. Each Hg atom is coordinated by the terminal phenyl rings of two neighboring complexes [Hg‐C from 3.40(1) to 4.10(1) Å] in a η² fashion.     

Tetra‐μ‐benzoato‐κ8O:O′‐bis({1‐[(3,4‐di­methoxy­phenyl)­methyl]‐6,7‐di­methoxy­iso­quinoline‐κN}­zinc(II)): the first crystal structure with papaverine as a ligand

The title complex, [Zn₂(C₇H₅O₂)₄(C₂₀H₂₁NO₄)₂], forms dimers of the paddle‐wheel cage type located at crystallographic inversion centres. The two Zn atoms [Zn⋯Zn = 3.0533 (4) Å] are connected by four syn–syn benzoate ligands. The apical positions of the square‐pyramidal zinc coordination polyhedra are occupied by the N atoms of the papaverine ligand. Upon coordination, the mutual orientation of the phenyl and iso­quinoline rings in papaverine is changed compared with that in the uncoordinated ligand.     

Selective Multiamination of C70 Leading to Curved π Systems with 60, 58, 56, and 50 π Electrons

Secondary aliphatic amines add to a pole pentagon of [70]fullerene in the presence of N‐fluorobenzenesulfonimide to form cyclopentadienyl‐type adducts, C₇₀(NSO₂Ph)(NR¹R²)₄ ( 1 ), which can be converted into analogous C₇₀ derivatives such as C₇₀(NHSO₂Ph)(NHTol)₅ ( 2 ). Further addition reactions of either 1 or 2 take place selectively at the opposite pole pentagon of the C₇₀ cage, thus forming curved π systems with a reduced number of π electrons, and the products include a dodecakis‐adduct with a Vögtle belt motif.     

Crystal Structure of the Mixed‐Valent Basic Mercury Nitrate HgI2(NO3)2·HgII(OH)(NO3)·HgII(NO3)2·4HgIIO [= Hg8O4(OH)(NO3)5]

Light‐yellow single crystals of the mixed‐valent mercury‐rich basic nitrate Hg₈O₄(OH)(NO₃)₅ were obtained as a by‐product at 85 °C from a melt consisting of stoichiometric amounts of (Hg^I₂)(NO₃)₂·2H₂O and Hg^II(OH)(NO₃). The title compound, represented by the more detailed formula Hg^I₂(NO₃)₂·Hg^II(OH)(NO₃)·Hg^II(NO₃)₂·4Hg^IIO, exhibits a new structure type (monoclinic, C2/c, Z = 4, a = 6.7708(7), b = 11.6692(11), c = 24.492(2) Å, β = 96.851(2)°, 2920 structure factors, 178 parameters, R1[F² > 2σ(F²)] = 0.0316) and is made up of almost linear [O‐Hg^II‐O] and [O‐Hg^I‐Hg^I‐O] building blocks with typical Hg^II‐O distances around 2.06Å and a Hg^I‐O distance of 2.13Å. The Hg₂²⁺ dumbbell exhibits a characteristic Hg‐Hg distance of 2.5079(7) Å. The different types of mercury‐oxygen units form a complex three‐dimensional network exhibiting large cavities which are occupied by the nitrate groups. The NO₃^? anions show only weak interactions between the nitrate oxygen atoms and the mercury atoms which are at distances > 2.6Å from one another. One of the three crystallographically independent nitrate groups is disordered.     

Thermal isomerization of ruthenium hydride compounds containing asymmetric bidentate pyrrole‐imine ligands

A series of ruthenium hydride compounds containing substituted bidentate pyrrole‐imine ligands were synthesized and characterized. Reacting RuHCl(CO)(PPh₃)₃ with one equivalent of [C₄H₃NH(2‐CH=NR)] in ethanol in the presence of KOH gave compounds {RuH(CO)(PPh₃)₂[C₄H₃N(2‐CH=NR)]} where trans‐Py‐Ru‐H 1, R = CH₂CH₂C₆H₉; cis‐Py‐Ru‐H 2, R = Ph‐2‐Me; and cis‐Py‐Ru‐H 3, R = C₆H₁₁. Heating trans‐Py‐Ru‐H 1 in toluene at 70°C for 12 hr resulted a thermal conversion of the trans‐Py‐Ru‐H 1 into its cis form, {RuH(CO)(PPh₃)₂[C₄H₃N(2‐CH=NCH₂CH₂C₆H₉)]} (cis‐Py‐Ru‐H 1) in very high yield. The ¹H NMR spectra of trans‐Py‐Ru‐H 1, cis‐Py‐Ru‐H 2, cis‐Py‐Ru‐H 3, and cis‐Py‐Ru‐H 1 all show a typical triplet at ca. δ–11 for the hydride. The trans and cis form indicate the relative positions of pyrrole ring and hydride. The geometries of trans‐Py‐Ru‐H 1, cis‐Py‐Ru‐H 1, and cis‐Py‐Ru‐H 3 are relatively similar showing typical octahedral geometries with two PPh₃ fragments arranged in trans positions.     

A head‐to‐head isomer of di‐μ‐pivalamidato‐κ4N,O‐bis­[(1,10‐phenanthroline‐κ2N,N′)­platinum(II)] dinitrate dihydrate

In the title compound, [Pt₂(C₅H₁₀NO)₂(C₁₂H₈N₂)₂](NO₃)₂·2H₂O, the intradimer Pt—Pt distance is relatively short [2.8489 (17) Å], which must be due to the strong intramolecular π–π‐stacking interactions between the phenanthroline moieties. The dimers stack along the c axis, forming one‐dimensional columns in which very intriguing d–d, π–π and d–π interactions exist. Although the dimer–dimer Pt...Pt distances are very long [4.340 (2) and 4.231 (2) Å], some short interdimer Pt...C contacts leading to strong interdimer associations are found [3.325 (19) and 3.402 (19) Å].     

New Insights into the Formation and Reactivity of Molecular Organostannonic Acids

The controlled base hydrolysis of 2,6‐Mes₂C₆H₃SnCl₃ ( 1 ; Mes=mesityl) provided 2,6‐Mes₂C₆H₃Sn(OH)Cl₂?H₂O ( 2 ) and the trinuclear organostannonic acid trans‐[2,6‐Mes₂C₆H₃Sn(O)OH]₃ ( 3 ), respectively. In moist C₆D₆, 3 reversibly reacts with water to give the monomeric organostannonic acid 2,6‐Mes₂C₆H₃Sn(OH)₃ ( 3a ). The reaction of 3 with (tBu₂SnO)₃, Ph₂PO₂H, and NaH, gives rise to the multinuclear hypercoordinated organostannoxane clusters [tBu₂Sn(OH)OSnR(OH)₂OC(OSntBu₂OH)₂(O)SnR(OH)(H₂O)]₂ ( 5 ), [RSn(OH)₂(O₂PPh₂)]₂ ( 6 ), and Na₃(RSn)₄O₆(OH)₃ ( 7 ), respectively (R=2,6‐Mes₂C₆H₃). The characterization of the new compounds is achieved by multinuclear NMR spectroscopy and electrospray mass spectrometry in solution and ¹¹⁹Sn MAS NMR spectroscopy, IR spectroscopy, and X‐ray crystallography in the solid‐state.     

A New Octadecanuclear Copper(II)‐Lanthanide(III) Cluster Complex: Synthesis and Structural Characterization of [Cu12Nd6(OH)24(betaine)16(NO3)3(H2O)10](NO3)[PF6]14·5H2O

The new octadecanuclear Cu‐Ln complex, [Cu₁₂Nd₆(OH)₂₄(betaine)₁₆(NO₃)₃(H₂O)₁₀](NO₃)[PF₆]₁₄·5H₂O, was synthesized, which crystallizes in triclinic P1¯ space group, a = 18.649(6)Å, b = 20.363(7)Å, c = 19.865(7)Å, α = 116.61(2)°, β = 91.99(2)°, γ = 117.93(2)°, V = 5666(3)ų. Its crystal structure features a [Cu₁₂Nd₆(OH)₂₄(betaine)₁₆(NO₃)₃(H₂O)₁₀]¹⁵⁺ core of pseudocubic O_h symmetry, with the six Nd ions positioned at the vertices of a regular octahedron and the twelve Cu ions located at the midpoints of the twelve octahedral edges. The Cu‐Nd metal framework may be viewed as a cuboctahedron, which is interconnected by twenty‐four μ₃‐OH bridges that are each linked to one Nd ion and two Cu ions. In the centre of metal polyhedron, there is an encapsulated NO₃^— anion that exhibits a multi‐ coordinating mode.     

Structural Variations and Molecular Dynamics of Rare‐Earth Metal Complexes with the N,N‐Bis(2‐{pyrid‐2‐yl}ethyl)hydroxylaminato Ligand

The reaction of the donor‐functionalised N,N‐bis(2‐{pyrid‐2‐yl}ethyl)hydroxylamine and [LnCp₃] (Cp=cyclopentadiene) resulted in the formation of bis(cyclopentadienyl) hydroxylaminato rare‐earth metal complexes of the general constitution [Ln(C₅H₅)₂{ON(C₂H₄‐o‐Py)₂}] (Py= pyridyl) with Ln=Lu ( 1 ), Y ( 2 ), Ho ( 3 ), Sm ( 4 ), Nd ( 5 ), Pr ( 6 ), La ( 7 ). These compounds were characterised by elemental analysis, mass spectrometry, NMR spectroscopy (for compounds 1 , 2 , 4 and 7 ) and single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction experiments. The complexes exhibit three different aggregation modes and binding motifs in the solid state. The late rare‐earth metal atoms (Lu, Y, Ho and Sm) form monomeric complexes of the formula [Ln(C₅H₅)₂{η²‐ON(C₂H₄‐η¹‐o‐Py)(C₂H₄‐o‐Py)}] ( 1 – 4 , respectively), in which one of the pyridyl nitrogen donor atoms is bonded to the metal atom in addition to the side‐on coordinating hydroxylaminato unit. The larger Nd³⁺ and Pr³⁺ ions in 5 and 6 make the hydroxylaminato unit capable of dimerising through the oxygen atoms. This leads to the dimeric complexes [(Ln(C₅H₅)₂{μ‐η¹:η²‐ON(C₂H₄‐o‐Py)₂})₂] without metal–pyridine bonds. Compound 7 exhibits a dimeric coordination mode similar to the complexes 5 and 6 , but, in addition, two pyridyl functions coordinate to the lanthanum atoms leading to the [(La(C₅H₅)₂{ON(C₂H₄‐o‐Py)}{μ‐η¹:η²‐ON(C₂H₄‐η¹‐o‐Py)})₂] complex. The aggregation trend is directly related to the size of the metal ions. The complexes with coordinative pyridine–metal bonds show highly dynamic behaviour in solution. The two pyridine nitrogen atoms rapidly change their coordination to the metal atom at ambient temperature. Variable‐temperature (VT) NMR experiments showed that this dynamic exchange can be frozen on the NMR timescale.