Hydrogen‐bonding and π–π inter­actions in 2‐amino‐4,6‐dimethyl­pyrimidinium salicylate

In the crystal structure of the title compound, C₆H₁₀N₃⁺·C₇H₅O₃⁻, the asymmetric unit contains four crystallographically independent 2‐amino‐4,6‐dimethyl­pyrimidinium and salicylate ions (Z = 8). In each of these, one of the pyrimidine N atoms is protonated, and the carboxyl­ate group of the salicylate ion inter­acts with the pyrimidine group through a pair of N—H⋯O hydrogen bonds, forming an R₂²(8) motif. The pyrimidine cations also form base pairs via a pair of N—H⋯N hydrogen bonds (involving the amino group and the unprotonated ring N atom), forming another R₂²(8) motif. Three such R₂²(8) motifs, fused together, constitute a closed cyclic aggregate, and the linking of these aggregates, arranged in consecutive layers, can be analysed in terms of off‐face stacking inter­actions.     

Hydrogen bonding and π–π inter­actions in a laminar structure: benzene‐1,3‐dicarboxylic acid–4‐methyl­pyridine (1/2)

The title complex, C₈H₆O₄·2C₆H₇N, consists of two crystallographically independent 1:2 clusters of benzene‐1,3‐­dicarboxylic acid and 4‐methyl­pyridine. Each cluster, the components of which are linked by O—H⋯N hydrogen bonds, is almost planar by alignment of C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds. Herring‐bone ribbons of clusters are formed by other C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds, and these ribbons are further packed to form a laminar structure by π–π inter­actions.     

C—H⋯O,C—H⋯π and π–π inter­actions in three benzofuran‐2‐yl ketone derivatives

The mol­ecules of 2‐benzoyl‐1‐benzofuran, C₁₅H₁₀O₂, (I), inter­act through double C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds, forming dimers that are further linked by C—H⋯O, C—H⋯π and π–π inter­actions, resulting in a three‐dimensional supramolecular network. The dihedral angle between the benzo­yl and benzofuran fragments in (I) is 46.15 (3)°. The mol­ecules of bis­(5‐bromo‐1‐benzofuran‐2‐yl) ketone, C₁₇H₈Br₂O₃, (II), exhibit C₂ symmetry, with the carbon­yl group (C=O) lying along the twofold rotation axis, and are linked by a combination of C—H⋯O and C—H⋯π inter­actions and Br⋯Br contacts to form sheets. The stability of the mol­ecular packing in 3‐mesit­yl‐3‐methyl­cyclo­but­yl 3‐methyl­naphtho[1,2‐b]furan‐2‐yl ketone, C₂₈H₂₈O₂, (III), arises from C—H⋯π and π–π stacking inter­actions. The fused naphthofuran moiety in (III) is essentially planar and makes a dihedral angle of 81.61 (3)° with the mean plane of the trimethyl­benzene ring.     

A norbornenyl derivative with through‐space ketone π‐interaction

The title compound, endo,exo‐12‐oxotetra­cyclo­[6.2.1.1^3,6.0^2,7]­dodeca‐9‐en‐anti‐11‐yl p‐bromo­benzoate, C₁₉H₁₇BrO₃, con­sists of norbornene with an anti‐p‐bromo­benzoate substituent at the methano bridge and an exo‐fused norbornanone unit bonded to the ethano bridge. The spatially proximate ketone and alkene interact through space and the ketone C atom is substantially pyramidalized. Through‐space ketone π‐inter­action is probably responsible for the low solvolysis rate of the anti‐11‐chloride derivative.     

A novel two‐dimensional metal–organic supramolecular framework including π–π stacking and hydrogen‐bond interactions

[μ‐N,N′‐Bis(pyridin‐3‐yl)benzene‐1,4‐dicarboxamide‐<!?show [forcelb]><!?tlsb=0.12pt>1:2κ²N:N′]bis{[N,N′‐bis(pyridin‐3‐yl)benzene‐1,4‐dicarboxamide‐κN]diiodidomercury(II)}, [Hg₂I₄(C₁₈H₁₄N₄O₂)₃], is an S‐shaped dinuclear molecule, composed of two HgI₂ units and three N,N′‐bis(pyridin‐3‐yl)benzene‐1,4‐dicarboxamide (L) ligands. The central L ligand is centrosymmetric and coordinated to two Hg^II cations via two pyridine N atoms, in a syn–syn conformation. The two terminal L ligands are monodentate, with one uncoordinated pyridine N atom, and each adopts a syn–anti conformation. The HgI₂ units show highly distorted tetrahedral (sawhorse) geometry, as the Hg^II centres lie only 0.34 (2) or 0.32 (2) Å from the planes defined by the I and pyridine N atoms. Supramolecular interactions, thermal stability and solid‐state luminescence properties were also measured.     

cis‐Dichloro­[tris­(2‐benzimidazolylmethyl)amine]iron(III) chloride ethanol dihydrate: hydrogen bonding changing the arrangement of tapes built from π–π and C—H⋯π inter­actions

The title compound, [FeCl₂(C₂₄H₂₁N₇)]Cl·C₂H₅OH·2H₂O, comprises an [FeCl₂(C₂₄H₂₁N₇)]⁺ cation, a Cl⁻ anion, an ethanol mol­ecule and two water mol­ecules. The cations are linked by π–π and C—H⋯π inter­actions into one‐dimensional tapes, and hydrogen bonding between the cations, Cl⁻ anions, and ethanol and water mol­ecules links these tapes into a three‐dimensional network.     

4‐Bromo‐2‐{[4‐(3‐mesityl‐3‐methyl­cyclo­butyl)thia­zol‐2‐yl]hydrazono­meth­yl}phenol,with N—H⋯N,C—H⋯π and π–π inter­actions

The title compound, C₂₄H₂₆BrN₃OS, crystallizes in the triclinic space group P, with two independent mol­ecules in the asymmetric unit. The mol­ecules adopt an E geometry about the azomethine C=N double bond. The structure is stabilized as dimers by N—H⋯N hydrogen bonding. C—H⋯π and π–π inter­actions are also effective in the crystal packing.     

A–π–D–π–A Electron‐Donating Small Molecules for Solution‐Processed Organic Solar Cells: A Review

Organic solar cells based on semiconducting polymers and small molecules have attracted considerable attention in the last two decades. Moreover, the power conversion efficiencies for solution‐processed solar cells containing A–π–D–π–A‐type small molecules and fullerenes have reached 11%. However, the method for designing high‐performance, photovoltaic small molecules still remains unclear. In this review, recent studies on A–π–D–π–A electron‐donating small molecules for organic solar cells are introduced. Moreover, the relationships between molecular properties and device performances are summarized, from which inspiration for the future design of high performance organic solar cells may be obtained.     

Substituted 4‐alkoxy‐7‐Cl‐quinolines exhibiting π–π stacking

The molecules of 4‐allyloxy‐7‐chloroquinoline, C₁₂H₁₀ClNO, (I), 7‐chloro‐4‐methoxyquinoline, C₁₀H₈ClNO, (II), and 7‐chloro‐4‐ethoxyquinoline, C₁₁H₁₀ClNO, (III), are all planar. In all three structures, π–π interactions between the quinoline ring systems are generated by unit‐cell translations along the a axes, irrespective of space group. These structures are the first reported for 4‐alkoxyquinolines.     

Hydrogen bonding and π–π stacking in 6‐hydroxy­biochanin A monohydrate

In the lattice of the title compound (systematic name: 5,6,7‐trihydroxy‐4′‐meth­oxy­isoflavone monohydrate), C₁₆H₁₂O₆·H₂O, the isoflavone mol­ecules are linked into chains through R₄³(17) motifs composed via O—H⋯O and C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds. Centrosymmetric R₄²(14) motifs assemble the chains into sheets. Hydrogen‐bonding and aromatic π–π stacking inter­actions lead to the formation of a three‐dimensional network structure.     

Hole Mobility Modulation in Single‐Crystal Metal Phthalocyanines by Changing the Metal–π/π–π Interactions

Weak intermolecular interactions in organic semiconducting molecular crystals play an important role in determining molecular packing and electronic properties. Single crystals of metal‐free and metal phthalocyanines were synthesized to investigate how the coordination of the central metal atom affects their molecular packing and resultant electronic properties. Single‐crystal field‐effect transistors were made and showed a hole mobility order of ZnPc>MnPc>FePc>CoPc>CuPc>H₂Pc>NiPc. Density functional theory (DFT) and 1D polaron transport theory reach a good agreement in reproducing the experimentally measured trend for hole mobility. Additional detail analysis at the DFT level suggests the metal atom coordination into H₂Pc planes can tune the hole mobility via adjusting the intermolecular distances along the shortest axis with closest parallel π stackings.     

The peptide NCbz‐Val‐Tyr‐OMe and aromatic π–π interactions

The peptide N‐benzyloxycarbonyl‐L‐valyl‐L‐tyrosine methyl ester or NCbz‐Val‐Tyr‐OMe (where NCbz is N‐benzyloxycarbonyl and OMe indicates the methyl ester), C₂₃H₂₈N₂O₆, has an extended backbone conformation. The aromatic rings of the Tyr residue and the NCbz group are involved in various attractive intra‐ and intermolecular aromatic π–π interactions which stabilize the conformation and packing in the crystal structure, in addition to N—H...O and O—H...O hydrogen bonds. The aromatic π–π interactions include parallel‐displaced, perpendicular T‐shaped, perpendicular L‐shaped and inclined orientations.     

Photophysical properties of σ–π‐conjugated alternating oligothienylene–oligosilylene polymers

UV‐visible absorption and fluorescence properties of three series of σ–π‐conjugated polymers (copolymers of alternative oligothienylene and oligosilylene units) have been studied in dioxane solution. The energies of the absorption maximum, fluorescence maximum, and the 0–0 transition are found to be linearly dependent on the reciprocal of the number of thiophene rings in the repeating unit of the polymer chain, but almost independent of the silicon atom number. The σ–π‐conjugation in the polymers results in red shift in the absorption and fluorescence maxima, higher fluorescence quantum yields, and longer fluorescence lifetimes of the polymers, with respect to their corresponding analogous α‐oligothiophenes. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci B: Polym Phys 37: 1873–1880, 1999     

D–π–A–π–A Strategy to Design Benzothiadiazole–carbazole‐based Conjugated Polymer with High Solar Cell Voltage and Enhanced Photocurrent

The theoretical calculations are used to find that D–π–A–π–A style conjugated polymer PC‐TBTBT is more efficient for solar cells application than the D–π–A analog PC‐TBT because the D–π–A–π–A structure has a narrower band gap and higher molar absorption coefficient and redshift spectrum. Motivated by the theoretical prediction, 5,6‐bis(octyloxy)‐2,1,3‐benzothiadiazole and 2,7‐carbazole are adopted to synthesize the D–π–A–π–A style PC‐TBTBT (M_w = 31.1 kDa) and D–π–A analog PC‐TBT (M_w = 87.5 kDa) by Suzuki coupling reaction. Experimental results confirm that D–π–A–π–A PC‐TBTBT ‐based solar cell shows a power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 4.74% with high V_OC of 0.99 V and enhanced J_SC of 9.70 mA cm⁻². The PCE and J_SC achieve improvements of 17% and 26%, respectively, compared to the D–π–A PC‐TBT ‐based solar cell.

     

cis‐Diaqua­[(E)‐2‐(2‐oxidobenzyl­idene­amino‐κ2N,O)­benzoato‐κO]copper(II): tubes built from O—H⋯O hydrogen‐bonding, π–π and C—H⋯π inter­actions

In the title compound, [Cu(C₁₄H₉NO₃)(H₂O)₂], which crystallizes with Z = 18 in the space group R, pairs of complexes are linked into dimers by three O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds. Strong O—H⋯O hydrogen bonds link the dimers into one‐dimensional chains that further assemble into tubes through π–π and C—H⋯π inter­actions.