Stereoisomers of 1,2‐diaryl‐1,3‐propanediols: erythro forms

Racemic erythro‐1,2‐diphenyl‐1,3‐propane­diol, C₁₅H₁₆O₂, is a model compound representative of erythro forms of structural elements of the 1,2‐diaryl‐1,3‐propane­diol type in lignins. In the crystal structure, the torsion angle between the bulky phenyl groups is −62.26 (11)°. Strong hydrogen bonds take part in a directed co‐operative O—H⋯O—H⋯O—H⋯O—H pattern that is assumed to have a decisive influence on the conformation. This is supported by comparisons with the geometries of related compounds.     

catena‐Poly[[[N,N′‐bis­(salicyl­idene)propane‐1,3‐diaminato]cobalt(III)]‐μ‐azido] and catena‐poly[[[N,N′‐bis(salicyl­idene)propane‐1,3‐diaminato]cobalt(III)]‐μ‐thio­cyanato]

The two title complexes, catena‐poly[[{2,2′‐[1,3‐propane­diylbis(nitrilo­methyl­idyne)]diphenolato}cobalt(III)]‐μ‐azido], [Co(C₁₇H₁₆N₂O₂)(N₃)]_n, (I), and catena‐poly[[{2,2′‐[1,3‐propane­diylbis(nitrilo­methyl­idyne)]diphenolato}cobalt(III)]‐μ‐thio­cyanato], [Co(C₁₇H₁₆N₂O₂)(NCS)]_n, (II), are isomorphous polynuclear cobalt(III) compounds. In both structures, the Co^III atom is six‐coordinated in an octa­hedral configuration by two N atoms and two O atoms of one Schiff base, and two terminal N or S atoms from two bridging ligands. The [N,N′‐bis­(salicyl­idene)propane‐1,3‐diaminato]cobalt(III) moieties are linked by the bridging ligands, viz. azide in (I) and thio­cyanate in (II), giving zigzag polymeric chains with backbones of the type [–Co—N—N—N—Co]_n in (I) or [–Co—N—C—S—Co]_n in (II) running along the c axis.     

Diaquabis(1,3‐propanediamine‐κ2N,N′)nickel(II) bis(sulfanilate)

The title compound, [Ni(C₃H₁₀N₂)₂(H₂O)₂](C₆H₆NO₃S)₂, contains alternating layers of sulfanilate anions and di­aqua­bis(1,3‐propane­di­amine)­nickel(II) cations. The Ni atom lies on an inversion centre and is hexacoordinated by the 1,3‐propane­di­amine ligands, which function as N,N′‐bidentate ligands, and the water mol­ecules, which are in a trans arrangement. The sulfanilate anions are arranged in layers, with the sulfonate and amine groups directed towards opposite sides of the layer. The structure is stabilized by a network of hydrogen bonding between the O and N atoms of the sulfanilate anions, the water mol­ecules, and the N atoms of the 1,3‐propane­di­amine ligands.     

[N,N′‐Bis­(salicyl­idene)‐2,2‐di­methyl‐1,3‐propane­diaminato]­nickel(II) and [N,N′‐bis­(salicyl­idene)‐2,2‐di­methyl‐1,3‐propane­diaminato]copper(II)

In the title compounds, {2,2′‐[2,2‐di­methyl‐1,3‐propane­diyl­bis­(nitrilo­methyl­idyne)]­diphenolato‐κ⁴N,N′,O,O′}nickel(II), [Ni(C₁₉H₂₀N₂O₂)], and {2,2′‐[2,2‐di­methyl‐1,3‐propane­diyl­bis­(nitrilo­methyl­idyne)]­diphenolato‐κ⁴N,N′,O,O′}copper(II), [Cu(C₁₉H₂₀N₂O₂)], the Ni^II and Cu^II atoms are coordinated by two iminic N and two phenolic O atoms of the N,N′‐bis­(salicyl­idene)‐2,2‐di­methyl‐1,3‐propane­diaminate (SALPD^2?, C₁₇H₁₆N₂O₂^2?) ligand. The geometry of the coordination sphere is planar in the case of the Ni^II complex and distorted towards tetrahedral for the Cu^II complex. Both complexes have a cis configuration imposed by the chelate ligand. The dihedral angles between the N/Ni/O and N/Cu/O coordination planes are 17.20 (6) and 35.13 (7)°, respectively.     

A zigzag‐type one‐dimensional coordination polymer formed by (2,2‐di­methyl‐1,3‐propane­di­amine)­bis­(iso­nico­tin­ato)­platinum(II) and copper nitrate

The title compound, catena‐poly­[[[tri­aqua‐2κ³O‐(2,2‐dimethyl‐1,3‐propane­di­am­ine)‐1κ²N,N′‐μ‐isonicotinato‐1:2κ²N:O‐copper(II)­plati­num(II)]‐μ‐isonicotinato‐2:1′κ²O:N] dinitrate], {[CuPt(C₆H₄NO₂)₂(C₅H₁₄N₂)(H₂O)₃](NO₃)₂}_n, obtain­ed from equimolar (dmpda)Pt^II(isonic)₂ (where dmpda is 2,2‐di­methyl‐1,3‐propane­di­amine and isonic is isonicotinate) and copper(II) nitrate, has been found to be a one‐dimensional coordination polymer of the zigzag‐type.     

3‐(1‐Pyridinio)propane­sulfonate and 3‐(benzyl­dimethyl­ammonio)propane­sulfonate monohydrate

3‐(1‐Pyridinio)propane­sulfonate, C₈H₁₁NO₃S, and 3‐(benzyl­dimethyl­ammonio)propane­sulfonate monohydrate, C₁₂H₁₉NO₃S·H₂O, used as additives during protein refolding and crystallization, both crystallize in the monoclinic system in the P2₁/c space group, with one mol­ecule (or one set of mol­ecules) per asymmetric unit. The solvent water mol­ecule present in the second crystal structure results in the formation of a dimer through hydrogen bonds. The conformation of the propane­sulfonate moiety is similar in both structures.     

A bis­(acetyl­acetonato)­uranium(IV) complex of the Schiff base N,N′‐bis(3‐hydroxy­salicyl­idene)‐2‐methyl‐1,2‐propane­di­amine

The title complex, bis­(acetyl­acetonato‐κ²O,O′)[N,N′‐bis(3‐hydroxy‐2‐oxidobenzaldimino)‐2‐methyl‐1,2‐propane­di­amine‐κ⁴N,O,O′,N′]­uranium(IV) tetra­hydro­furan solvate, [U(C₁₈H₁₈N₂O₄)(C₅H₇O₂)₂]·C₄H₈O, is a rare example of a uranium(IV) complex with a compartmental Schiff base. The U atom is located in the N₂O₂ inner site of the hexadentate N,N′‐bis(3‐hydroxy‐2‐oxidobenzaldimino)‐2‐methyl‐1,2‐pro­pane­di­amine group and is bound also to the two O atoms of both acetyl­acetonate moieties, which results in a dodecahedral coordination environment. Centrosymmetric dimers are formed through intermolecular hydrogen bonds that link the terminal uncoordinated hydroxy groups to one another and to the O atoms of the acetyl­acetonate ligands.     

[N,N′‐Bis(5‐bromo­salicyl­idene)‐1,3‐di­amino­propane]­nickel(II) and [N,N′‐­bis(5‐chloro­salicyl­idene)‐1,3‐­di­amino­propane]copper(II)

The title compounds, {4,4′‐di­bromo‐2,2′‐[1,3‐propane­diyl­bis(nitrilo­methyl­idyne‐N)]­diphenolato‐O,O′}nickel(II), [Ni(C₁₇­H₁₄­Br₂­N₂O₂)], and {4,4′‐di­chloro‐2,2′‐[1,3‐pro­pane­diyl­bis­(ni­trilo­methyl­idyne‐N)]­di­phen­ol­ato‐O,O′}­copper(II), [Cu­(C₁₇­H₁₄­Cl₂­N₂O₂)], lie on crystallographic twofold axes. In both structures, the metal coordination sphere is a tetrahedrally distorted square plane formed by the four‐coordinate N₂O₂ donor set of the Schiff base imine–phenol ligands. In the Ni compound, the Ni—O and Ni—N distances are 1.908 (3) and 1.959 (4) Å, respectively, while in the Cu compound, the Cu—O and Cu—N distances are 1.907 (2) and 1.960 (2) Å, respectively. The two Schiff base moieties, which themselves are nearly planar, are inclined at an angle of 29.26 (7)° for the Ni compound and 29.26 (5)° for the Cu compound.     

Tri­azido­cobalt(III) complexes with tridentate amine ligands

The title compounds, [N‐(2‐amino­ethyl)‐1,3‐propane­di­amine‐κ³N]­tri­azido­cobalt(III), [Co(N₃)₃(C₅H₁₅N₃)], [N‐(2‐amino­ethyl)‐N‐methyl‐1,3‐propane­di­amine‐κ³N]­tri­azido­cobalt(III), [Co(N₃)₃(C₆H₁₇N₃)], [N‐(2‐amino­propyl)‐1,3‐pro­pane­di­am­ine‐κ³N]­tri­azido­cobalt(III), [Co(N₃)₃(C₆H₁₇N₃)], and [N‐(2‐amino­propyl)‐N‐methyl‐1,3‐pro­pane­di­am­ine‐κ³N]triazidocobalt(III), [Co(N₃)₃­(C₇­H₁₉­N₃)], each consist of a Co^III atom, three azide ligands in a meridional configuration and a tridentate amine ligand, namely aepn [N‐(2‐amino­ethyl)‐1,3‐propane­di­amine] or dpt [N‐(3‐amino­propyl)‐1,3‐pro­pane­di­amine], or their N‐methyl­­ated analogs.     

Bis­[(2,2‐di­methyl‐1,3‐propane­diamine‐κ2N,N′)(piperidine‐2‐car­boxylato‐κ2N,O)­platinum(II)] sulfate

The title compound, [Pt(C₆H₁₀NO₂)(C₅H₁₄N₂)]₂(SO₄), crystallizes with two cations in the asymmetric unit. The two complex cations, which have a square‐planar Pt^II coordination, are chemically identical but differ slightly in the conformations of their amine groups. A neutral complex, viz. (2,2‐di­methyl‐1,3‐propane­di­amine‐κ²N,N′)bis(2‐piperidine­carb­oxyl­ato‐κN)platinum(II), is shown to form in solution and to change rapidly into the title compound.     

(±)‐6‐tert‐Butyl‐8‐hydroxymethyl‐2‐­phenyl‐4H‐1,3‐benzodioxin and 2,2,2′,2′,6,6′‐hexamethyl‐8,8′‐methylenebis(4H‐1,3‐benzodioxin)

Two compounds containing 1,3‐benzodioxin groups are reported, namely (±)‐6‐tert‐butyl‐8‐hydroxy­methyl‐2‐phenyl‐4H‐1,3‐benzodioxin, C₁₉H₂₂O₃, (I), and 2,2,2′,2′,6,6′‐hexamethyl‐8,8′‐methyl­enebis(4H‐1,3‐benzodioxin), C₂₃H₂₈O₄, (II).The hydroxy groups of neighbouring mol­ecules in (I) are hydrogen bonded to each other, giving rise to double‐row chains. The mol­ecule in (II) adopts a `butterfly' conformation, with the O atoms in distal positions. In both compounds, the dioxin rings are in distorted half‐chair conformations.     

Three isomeric forms of hydroxyphenyl‐2‐oxazoline: 2‐(2‐hydroxyphenyl)‐2‐oxazoline, 2‐(3‐hydroxyphenyl)‐2‐oxazoline and 2‐(4‐hydroxyphenyl)‐2‐oxazoline

Crystal structures are reported for three isomeric compounds, namely 2‐(2‐hydroxy­phenyl)‐2‐oxazoline, (I), 2‐(3‐hydroxy­phenyl)‐2‐oxazoline, (II), and 2‐(4‐hydroxy­phenyl)‐2‐oxazoline, (III), all C₉H₉NO₂ [systematic names: 2‐(4,5‐dihydro‐1,3‐oxazol‐2‐yl)phenol, (I), 3‐(4,5‐dihydro‐1,3‐oxazol‐2‐yl)phenol, (II), and 4‐(4,5‐dihydro‐1,3‐oxazol‐2‐yl)phenol, (III)]. In these compounds, the deviation from coplanarity of the oxazoline and benzene rings is dependent on the position of the hydroxy group on the benzene ring. The coplanar arrangement in (I) is stabilized by a strong intra­molecular O—H⋯N hydrogen bond. Surprisingly, the 2‐oxazoline ring in mol­ecule B of (II) adopts a ³T₄ (^C2T_C3) conformation, while the 2‐oxazoline ring in mol­ecule A, as well as that in (I) and (III), is nearly planar, as expected. Tetra­mers of mol­ecules of (II) are formed and they are bound together via weak C—H⋯N hydrogen bonds. In (III), strong inter­molecular O—H⋯N hydrogen bonds and weak intra­molecular C—H⋯O hydrogen bonds lead to the formation of an infinite chain of mol­ecules perpendicular to the b direction. This paper also reports a theoretical investigation of hydrogen bonds, based on density functional theory (DFT) employing periodic boundary conditions.     

2,3‐Dihydro‐3‐methyl‐2‐nitrimino‐1,3‐thiazole

The title compound {alternatively, 3‐methyl‐2‐[oxido(oxo)hydrazono]‐2,3‐dihydro‐1,3‐thiazole}, C₄H₅N₃O₂S, was obtained by methyl­ation of N‐(2‐thia­zolyl)­nitr­amine. The molecule lies on a mirror plane and the thia­zole ring is planar, regular in shape and aromatic. The S atom participates in the aromatic sextet via an electron pair on the 3p_z orbital. In the crystal, the mol­ecules are arranged in parallel layers, bound to each other by weak C—H?O and C—H?N hydrogen bonds and by S?O dipolar interactions, with an interlayer separation of 3.23 Å.     

Synthesis of 2,3‐Diaryl‐3H‐pyrrolo[2,3‐c]pyridin‐3‐ol Derivatives by the Reaction of Aryl(3‐isocyanopyridin‐4‐yl)methanones with Aryl Grignard Reagents

The reaction of aryl(3‐isocyanopyridin‐4‐yl)methanones 1 , easily prepared from commercially available pyridin‐3‐amine, with aryl Grignard reagents gave, after aqueous workup, 2,3‐diaryl‐3H‐pyrrolo[2,3‐c]pyridin‐3‐ols 2 . These rather unstable alcohols were O‐acylated with Ac₂O in pyridine in the presence of a catalytic amount of 4‐(dimethylamino)pyridine (DMAP) to afford the corresponding 2,3‐diaryl‐3H‐pyrrolo[2,3‐c]pyridin‐3‐yl acetates 3 in relatively good yields.     

3‐Germyl‐3,3‐di­methyl­propionic acid derivatives

The crystal structures of 3,3‐di­methyl‐3‐(tri­chloro­germyl)­propionic acid, [Ge(C₅H₉O₂)Cl₃], 3,3‐di­methyl‐3‐(tri­phenyl­germyl)­propionic acid, [Ge(C₆H₅)₃(C₅H₉O₂)], and 3,3‐di­methyl‐3‐(tri‐p‐toly­lgermyl)­propionic acid, [Ge(C₇H₇)₃(C₅H₉O₂)], have slightly distorted tetrahedral geometries about the Ge atoms. All the structures form dimers via strong O—H·O hydrogen bonds, resulting in eight‐membered rings that can be best described in terms of graph‐set notation (8).     

A stacked pyrazolo[3,4‐d]pyrimidine‐based flexible molecule: the effect of a bulky benzyl group on intermolecular stacking in comparison with methyl and ethyl groups

In the crystal structure of 1,1′‐(1,3‐propane­diyl)­bis(5‐benzyl‐6‐methyl­sulfanyl‐4,5‐di­hydro‐1H‐pyrazolo­[3,4‐d]­pyrimidin‐4‐one), C₂₉H₂₈N₈O₂S₂, the pairs of pyrazolo­[3,4‐d]­pyrimidine rings stack as a result of intramolecular π–π interactions between the heterocyclic rings. The folded mol­ecules are further stacked in pairs, due to intermolecular aromatic π–π interactions and C—H?O hydrogen bonds.     

1,3‐Dibenzoylimidazolidine‐2‐thione and 1,3‐dibenzo­yl‐3,4,5,6‐tetra­hydro­pyrimidine‐2(1H)‐thione

The title compounds, 1,3‐dibenzo­ylimidazolidine‐2‐thione, C₁₇H₁₄N₂O₂S, (I), and 1,3‐dibenzo­yl‐3,4,5,6‐tetra­hydro­pyrimidine‐2(1H)‐thione, C₁₈H₁₆N₂O₂S, (II), were obtained from the reactions of imidazolidine‐2‐thione and 1,4,5,6‐tetra­hydro­pyrimidine‐2‐thiol, respectively, with benzoyl chloride. Compounds (I) and (II) contain, respectively, imidazolidinethione [C=S = 1.6509 (14) Å] and ­pyrimidinethione [C=S = 1.6918 (19) Å] moieties bonded to two benzoyl rings. The mol­ecules of (I) exhibit C₂ symmetry, the C=S bond lying along the twofold rotation axis, while the mol­ecules of (II) have mirror symmetry (C_s). The imida­zolidine ring in (I) is essentially planar, while the pyrimidine ring in (II) adopts a boat conformation. Mol­ecules of (I) are linked by weak inter­molecular C—H⋯O inter­actions, while mol­ecules of (II) are held together by van der Waals inter­actions.     

Two regioisomers of condensed thioheterocyclic triazine synthesized from 6‐phenyl‐3‐thioxo‐2,3,4,5‐tetrahydro‐1,2,4‐triazin‐5‐one

In the crystal structure of 6‐phenyl‐3‐thioxo‐2,3,4,5‐tetrahydro‐1,2,4‐triazin‐5‐one, C₉H₇N₃OS, (I), the 1,2,4‐triazine moieties are connected by face‐to‐face contacts through two kinds of double hydrogen bonds (N—H...O and N—H...S), which form planar ribbons along the a axis. The ribbons are crosslinked through C—H...π interactions between the phenyl rings. The molecular structures of two regioisomeric compounds, namely 6‐phenyl‐2,3‐dihydro‐7H‐1,3‐thiazolo[3,2‐b][1,2,4]triazin‐7‐one, C₁₁H₉N₃OS, (II), and 3‐phenyl‐6,7‐dihydro‐4H‐1,3‐thiazolo[2,3‐c][1,2,4]triazin‐4‐one, C₁₁H₉N₃OS, (III), which were prepared by the condensation reaction of (I) with 1,2‐dibromoethane, have been characterized by X‐ray crystallography and spectroscopic studies. The crystal structures of (II) and (III) both show two crystallographically independent molecules. While the two compounds are isomers, the unit‐cell parameters and crystal packing are quite different and (II) has a chiral crystal structure.     

4,5‐Propyl­enedi­thio‐1,3‐di­thiole‐2‐thione and 4,5‐propyl­enedi­thio‐1,3‐di­thiol‐2‐one

4,5‐Propyl­ene­di­thio‐1,3‐di­thiole‐2‐thione, C₆H₆S₅, (I), crystallizes in the centrosymmetric space group P2₁/c. The molecular packing is characterized by pairs of S⋯S intermolecular contacts between neighbouring mol­ecules, which may account for the rather high thermal stablity of the crystal. 4,5‐Propyl­ene­di­thio‐1,3‐di­thiol‐2‐one, C₆H₆OS₄, (II), in which an O atom replaces the terminal S atom of (I), crystallizes in the non‐centrosymmetric polar space group Cc. The packing pattern of (II) indicates that the macropolarization direction is along [101]. Although the packing patterns are qualitatively significantly different, the molecular structures of (I) and (II) are similar, each exhibiting a chair conformation.     

Isatin 3‐semicarbazone and 1‐methyl­isatin 3‐semicarbazone

The two title semicarbazones, namely 2,3‐dihydro‐1H‐indole‐2,3‐dione 3‐semicarbazone, C₉H₈N₄O₂, (I), and 1‐methyl‐2,3‐dihydro‐1H‐indole‐2,3‐dione 3‐semicarbazone, C₁₀H₁₀N₄O₂, (II), show the same configuration, viz. Z around the imine C=N bond and E around the C(O)—NH₂ bond, stabilized by two intra­molecular hydrogen bonds. The presence of a methyl group on the isatin N atom determines the difference in the packing; in (I), the mol­ecules are linked into chains which lie in the crystallographic (102) plane and run perpendicular to the b axis, while in (II), the mol­ecules are arranged to form helices running parallel to a crystallographic screw axis in the a direction.