Families of finite sets in which no set is covered by the union of two others

Let f^k(n) denote the maximum of k-subsets of an n-set satisfying the condition in the title. It is proven that f^{2t ? 1}(n) ? f^2t(n + 1) ? $\text{(}{}_{\mathrm{t}}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{)}\text{(}{}_{\mathrm{t}}{}^{\mathrm{2t?1}}\text{)}$ with equalities holding iff there exists a Steiner-system S(t, 2t ? 1, n). The bounds are approximately best possile for k ? 6 and of correct order of magnitude for k >/ 7, as well, even if the corresponding Steiner-systems do not exist.Exponential lower and upper bounds are obtained for the case if we do not put size restrictions on the members of the family (i.e., the nonuniform case).     

Binomial self-inverse sequences and tangent coefficients

This paper treats the class of sequences {a_n} that satisfy the recurrence relation

$\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{2n+1}}\text{=∑}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>k=0</mtext>}}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>n</mtext>}}\text{(?1)}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>k</mtext>}}\text{(}\text{n}\text{k}\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{d}{}^{\mathrm{n?k}}$

between the odd and even terms of {a_n} that involves the coefficients of tan(t), namely

$\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{2n+1}}\text{=∑}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>k=0</mtext>}}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>n</mtext>}}\text{(?1)}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>k</mtext>}}\text{(}\text{2}\text{n}\text{+1}\text{2}\text{k}\text{+1}\text{)}\text{T}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{(d/2)}{}^{\mathrm{2k+1}}\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{2n?2k}}$

A combinatorial setting is then provided to elucidate the appearance of the tangent coefficients in this equation.     

Factorization of fredholm operators on analytic functions

Let Ω be a simply connected domain in the complex plane, and $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{)}$, the space of functions which are defined and analytic on $\text{Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n}}$, if K is the operator on elements $\text{u(t, a}{}_1\text{, …, a}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{)}\text{of}\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}\text{)}$ defined in terms of the kernels k_i(t, s, a₁, …, a_n) in $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 2}}\text{)}$ by is the identity operator on $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}\text{)}$, then the operator I ? K may be factored in the form (I ? K)(M ? W) = (I ? ΠK)(M ? ΠW). Here, W is an operator on $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}\text{)}$ defined in terms of a kernel w(t, s, a₁, …, a_n) in $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 2}}\text{)}$ by Wu = ∝_an^tw(t, s, a₁, …, a_n) u(s, a₁, …, a_n) ds. ΠW is the operator; ΠWu = ∝_{an ? 1}w(t, s, a₁, …, a_n) u(s, a₁, …, a_n) ds. ΠK is the operator; ΠKu = ∑_{i = 1}^{n ? 1} ∝_ai^tk_i(t, s, a₁, …, a_n) ds + ∝_{an ? 1}^tk_n(t, s, a₁, …, a_n) u(s, a₁, …, a_n) ds. The operator M is of the form m(t, a₁, …, a_n)I, where $\text{m ? A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}\text{)}$ and maps elements of $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}\text{)}$ into itself by multiplication. The function m is uniquely derived from K in the following manner. The operator K defines an operator $\text{K}{}^1$ on functions u in $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 2}}\text{)}$, by . A determinant $\text{δ(I ? K}{}^1\text{)}$ of the operator $\text{I ? K}{}^1$ is defined as an element $\text{m}{}^1\text{(t, a}{}_1\text{, …, a}{}_{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}\text{)}$ of $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 2}}\text{)}$. This is mapped into $\text{A(Ω}{}^{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}\text{)}$ by setting a_{n + 1} = t to give m(t, a₁, …, a_n). The operator I ? ΠK may be factored in similar fashion, giving rise to a chain factorization of I ? K. In some cases all the matrix kernels k_i defining K are separable in the sense that k_i(t, s, a₁, …, a_n) = P_i(t, a₁, …, a_n) Q_i(s, a₁, …, a_n), where P_i is a 1 × p_i matrix and Q_i is a p_i × 1 matrix, each with elements in $\text{A(Ω}{}_{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}\text{)}$, explicit formulas are given for the kernels of the factors W. The various results are stated in a form allowing immediate extension to the vector-matrix case.     

Connected matroids with the smallest whitney numbers

In “The Slimmest Geometric Lattices” (Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.). Dowling and Wilson showed that if G is a combinatorial geometry of rank r(G) = n, and if _X(G) = Σμ(0, x)λ^{r ? r(x)} = Σ (?1)^{r ? k}W_kλ^k is the characteristic polynomial of G, then

$\text{w}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{?}\text{r}\text{k}\text{+n}\text{r?1}\text{k}$

Thus γ(G) ? 2^{r ? 1} (n+2), where γ(G) = Σw_k. In this paper we sharpen these lower bounds for connected geometries: If G is connected, r(G) ? 3, and n(G) ? 2 ((r, n) ≠ (4,3)), then

$\text{w}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{?}\text{r}\text{i}\text{+ n}\text{r}\text{i+1}\text{for i>1; w}{}_1\text{?r+n}\text{r}\text{2}\text{? 1;}$

|μ| ? (r? 1)n; and γ ? (2^{r ? 1} ? 1)(2n + 2). These bounds are all achieved for the parallel connection of an r-point circuit and an (n + 1)point line. If G is any series-parallel network, $\text{r(G) = r(}\text{G}\text{?}\text{) = 4}$, and $\text{n(G) = n(}\text{G}\text{?}\text{) = 3}$ then $\text{(w}{}_1\text{(G))}{}^4{}_{\mathrm{t-G}}\text{? (w}{}_1\text{(}\text{G}\text{?}\text{)) = (8, 20, 18, 7, 1)}$. Further, if β is the Crapo invariant,

$\text{β(G)=}\text{d}{}_{\mathrm{X}}\text{(G)}\text{dλ}\text{(1)}\text{,}$

then β(G) ? max(1, n ? r + 2). This lower bound is achieved by the parallel connection of a line and a maximal size series-parallel network.     

On a function due to S. Chowla

Let θ(k, pⁿ) be the least s such that the congruence $\text{x}{}_1{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{+ ? + x}{}_{\mathrm{s}}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{≡ 0}$ (mod pⁿ) has a nontrivial solution. It is shown that if k is sufficiently large and divisible by p but not by p ? 1, then $\text{θ(k, p}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{) ≤ k}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}$. We also obtain the average order of θ(k), the least s such that the above congruence has a nontrivial solution for every prime p and every positive integer n.     

Factorizing the complete graph into factors with large star number

The graph G has star number n if any n vertices of G belong to a subgraph which is a star. Let f(n, k) be the smallest number m such that the complete graph on m vertices can be factorized into k factors with star number n. In the present paper we prove that $\text{c}{}_1{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{k ≤ f(n, k) < c}{}_2{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{k}$.     

On Lp estimates for the wave equation

New and more elementary proofs are given of two results due to W. Littman: (1) Let $\text{n ? 2, p ?}\text{2n}\text{(n ? 1)}$. The estimate $\text{∫∫ (¦▽u¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{+ ¦u}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{) dx dt ? C ∫∫ ¦□u¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{dx dt}$ cannot hold for all u?C₀^∞(Q), Q a cube in $\text{R}{}^{\mathrm{<mi\; mathvariant="italic"\; is="true">n</mi>}}\text{× R}$, some constant C. (2) Let n ? 2, p ≠ 2. The estimate $\text{∫ (¦▽(t)¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{+ ¦u}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{(t)¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{) dx ? C(t) ∫ (¦▽u(0)¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{+ ¦u}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{(0)¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{) dx}$ cannot hold for all C^∞ solutions of the wave equation □u = 0 in $\text{R}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{x R}$; all t ?$\text{R}$; some function C: $\text{R}$ → $\text{R}$.     

Cup products in Grassmannians

This note calculates the height of the first Stiefel-Whitney class in the cohomology of the real Grassmannians and determines the length of the longest nontrivial cup-product in $\text{H}{}^1\text{(G}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{(R}{}^{\mathrm{n+k}}\text{);Z}{}_2\text{) (k?n)}$ with k?4.     

On the length of optimal TSP circuits in sets of bounded diameter

Let V be a set of n points in R^k. Let d(V) denote the diameter of V, and l(V) denote the length of the shortest circuit which passes through all the points of V. (Such a circuit is an “optimal TSP circuit”.) l^k(n) are the extremal values of l(V) defined by l^k(n)=max{l(V)|V∈V_n^k}, where V_n^k={V|V?R^k,|V|=n, d(V)=1}. A set V∈V_n^k is “longest” if l(V)=l^k(n). In this paper, first some geometrical properties of longest sets in R² are studied which are used to obtain l²(n) for small n′s, and then asymptotic bounds on l^k(n) are derived. Let δ(V) denote the minimal distance between a pair of points in V, and let: δ^k(n)=max{δ(V)|V∈V_n^k}. It is easily observed that $\text{δ}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{(n)=O(n}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>?1</mtext><mtext>k</mtext>}}\text{)}$. Hence, $\text{c}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{=}\text{lim sup}{}_{\mathrm{n\to \infty }}\text{δ}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{(n)n}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>k</mtext>}}$ exists. It is shown that for all $\text{n, c}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{n}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>?1</mtext><mtext>k</mtext>}}\text{≤δ}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{(n)}$, and hence, for all $\text{n, l}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{(n)≥ c}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{n}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1?1</mtext><mtext>k</mtext>}}$. For k=2, this implies that $\text{l}{}^2\text{(n)≥(}\text{π}{}^2\text{12}\text{)}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>4</mtext>}}\text{n}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}$, which generalizes an observation of Fejes-Toth that $\text{lim}{}_{\mathrm{n\to \infty }}\text{l}{}^2\text{(n)n}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>?1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{≥(}\text{π}{}^2\text{12}\text{)}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>4</mtext>}}$. It is also shown that $\text{l}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{(n) ≤ [}\text{(3?√3)k}\text{(k?1)}\text{]nδ}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{(n) + o(n}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1?</mtext><mtext>1</mtext><mtext>k</mtext>}}\text{) ≤ [}\text{(3?√3)k}\text{(k?1)}\text{]n}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1?</mtext><mtext>1</mtext><mtext>k</mtext>}}\text{+ o(n}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1?</mtext><mtext>1</mtext><mtext>k</mtext>}}\text{)}$. The above upper bound is used to improve related results on longest sets in k-dimensional unit cubes obtained by Few (Mathematika2 (1955), 141–144) for almost all k′s. For k=2, Few's technique is used to show that $\text{l}{}^2\text{(n)≤(}\text{πn}\text{2}\text{)}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{+ O(1)}$.     

Cogrowth and amenability of discrete groups

Let G be a group and g₁,…, g_t a set of generators. There are approximately (2t ? 1)ⁿ reduced words in g₁,…, g_t, of length ?n. Let $\text{}\text{?}\text{gg}{}_{\mathrm{n}}$ be the number of those which represent 1_G. We show that $\text{γ =}\text{lim}{}_{\mathrm{n\; \to \; \infty }}\text{(}\text{}\text{?}\text{gg}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{)}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>n</mtext>}}$ exists. Clearly 1 ? γ ? 2t ? 1. $\text{η =}\text{(}\text{log}\text{γ)}\text{(}\text{log}\text{(2t ? 1))}$ is the cogrowth. 0 ? η ? 1. In fact $\text{η ∈ {0} ∪ (}\text{1}\text{2}\text{, 1¦}$. The entropic dimension of G is shown to be 1 ? η. It is then proved that d(G) = 1 if and only if G is free on g₁,…, g_t and d(G) = 0 if and only if G is amenable.     

Asymptotic properties of general symmetric hyperbolic systems

Results on partition of energy and on energy decay are derived for solutions of the Cauchy problem $\text{?u}\text{?t}\text{+ ∑}{}_{\mathrm{j\; =\; 1}}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{A}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{?u}\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{= 0, u(0, x) = ?(x)}$. Here the A_j's are constant, k × k Hermitian matrices, x = (x₁,…, x_n), t represents time, and u = u(t, x) is a k-vector. It is shown that the energy of Mu approaches a limit $\text{E}{}_{\mathrm{M}}\text{(?)}\text{as}\text{¦ t ¦ → ∞}$, where M is an arbitrary matrix; that there exists a sufficiently large subspace of data ?, which is invariant under the solution group U₀(t) and such that $\text{U}{}_0\text{(t)? = 0}\text{for}\text{¦ x ¦ ? a ¦ t ¦ ? R, a}\text{and}\text{R}$ depending on ? and that the local energy of nonstatic solutions decays as $\text{¦ t ¦ → ∞}$. More refined results on energy decay are also given and the existence of wave operators is established, considering a perturbed equation $\text{E(x)}\text{?u}\text{?t}\text{+ ∑}{}_{\mathrm{j\; =\; 1}}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{A}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{?u}\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{= 0,}\text{where}\text{¦ E(x) ? I ¦ = O(¦ x ¦}{}^{\mathrm{?1\; ?\; ?}}\text{)}$ at infinity.     

Size Ramsey numbers involving stars

We calculate some size Ramsey numbers involving stars. For example we prove that for t ? k ? 2 and n sufficiently large the size Ramsey number.

$\text{r}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{(K}{}_{\mathrm{1,k}}\text{K}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{+}\text{K}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{=}\text{k(t?1)+1}\text{2}\text{+(k(t?1)+1)(n+k?1).}$

     

On the closability of some positive definite symmetric differential forms on c0∞(ω)

Let $\text{S}$ be a Dirichlet form in $\text{L}{}^2\text{(Ω; m)}$, where Ω is an open subset of $\text{R}$ⁿ, n ? 2, and m a Radon measure on Ω; for each integer k with 1 ? k < n, let $\text{S}$_k be a Dirichlet form on some k-dimensional submanifold $\text{Ω}{}_{\mathrm{k}}$ of Ω. The paper is devoted to the study of the closability of the forms E with domain $\text{C}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{(Ω)}$ and defined by: $\text{(?,g)=}$$\text{E}$$\text{(?, g)+}\text{∑}\text{i}\text{p}\text{=1}$$\text{E}$k_i where 1 ? k_p < ? < n, and where , g^k_i denote restrictions of ?, g in $\text{C}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{(Ω)}$ to . Conditions are given for E to be closable if, for each i = 1,…, p, one has k_i = n ? i. Other conditions are given for E to be nonclosable if, for some i, k_i < n ? i.     

Ω-Theorems for the real part of the Riemann zeta function

For s = σ + it, σ > 1, and integer k ? 1$\text{ζ}{}^{\mathrm{k}}\text{(s) = ∑}\text{d}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{(n)}\text{n}{}^3$. In a previous paper, Ω results for $\text{ζ(c + it),}\text{1}\text{2}\text{? c ? 1}$, where obtained in an elementary way by choosing N = N(k, c) so that the size of the single term d_k(N) gave Ω results slightly better than existing ones. Here the method will be shown to give the same results for Re ζ(c + it).     

A transfer spectral sequence for fixed point free involutions with an application to stunted real projective spaces

We show that if X is a finite CW-complex admitting a fixed point free involution then there is a singly graded spectral sequence with $\text{E}{}^1{}_1\text{? H}{}^1\text{(X;}\text{Z}{}_2\text{)}$ and $\text{E}{}^1\text{∞ = 0}$. As an application we prove that for any n > 0 there is a natural number k(n) such that if n > k(n) and X is a homotopy $\text{R}\text{P}{}^{\mathrm{n+k}}\text{R}\text{P}{}^{\mathrm{n}}$, then X will not admit a fixed point free involution.     

Lp estimates for the wave equation

Let u(x, t) be the solution of u_tt ? Δ_xu = 0 with initial conditions $\text{u(x, 0) = g(x)}\text{and}\text{u}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{(x, 0) = ?;(x)}$. Consider the linear operator $\text{T: ?; → u(x, t)}$. (Here g = 0.) We prove for t fixed the following result. Theorem 1: T is bounded in L^p if and only if . Theorem 2: If the coefficients are variables in C and constant outside of some compact set we get: (a) If n = 2k the result holds for $\text{¦ p}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{? 2}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{¦ < (n ? 1)}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}$. (b) If n = 2k ? 1, the result is valid for $\text{¦ p}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{? 2}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{¦ ? (n ? 1)}$. This result are sharp in the sense that for p such that $\text{¦ p}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{? 2}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{¦ > (n ? 1)}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}$ we prove the existence of $\text{?; ? L}{}^{\mathrm{P}}$ in such a way that $\text{T?; ? L}{}^{\mathrm{P}}$. Several applications are given, one of them is to the study of the Klein-Gordon equation, the other to the completion of the study of the family of multipliers $\text{m(ξ) = ψ(ξ) e}{}^{\mathrm{i¦\xi ¦}}\text{¦ ξ ¦}{}^{\mathrm{?b}}$ and finally we get that the convolution against the kernel $\text{K(x) = ?(x)(1 ? ¦ x ¦)}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}$ is bounded in H¹.     

Two-parameter Turan inequalities for ultraspherical and Laguerre polynomials

It is known that the classical orthogonal polynomials satisfy inequalities of the form U_n²(x) ? U_{n + 1}(x) U_{n ? 1}(x) > 0 when x lies in the spectral interval. These are called Turan inequalities. In this paper we will prove a generalized Turan inequality for ultraspherical and Laguerre polynomials. Specifically if P_n^λ(x) and L_n^α(x) are the ultraspherical and Laguerre polynomials and $\text{F}{}_{\mathrm{n}}{}^{\mathrm{\lambda }}\text{(x) =}\text{P}{}_{\mathrm{n}}{}^{\mathrm{\lambda }}\text{(x)}\text{P}{}_{\mathrm{n}}{}^{\mathrm{\lambda }}\text{(1)}\text{, G}{}_{\mathrm{n}}{}^{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{(x) =}\text{L}{}_{\mathrm{n}}{}^{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{(x)}\text{L}{}_{\mathrm{n}}{}^{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{(0)}\text{,}\text{then}\text{F}{}_{\mathrm{n}}{}^{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{(x) F}{}_{\mathrm{n}}{}^{\mathrm{\beta }}\text{(x) ? F}{}_{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}{}^{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{(x) F}{}_{\mathrm{n\; ?\; 1}}{}^{\mathrm{\beta }}\text{(x) > 0, ? 1 < x < 1, ?}\text{1}\text{2}\text{< α ? β ? α + 1}\text{and}\text{G}{}_{\mathrm{n}}{}^{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{(x) G}{}_{\mathrm{n}}{}^{\mathrm{\beta }}\text{(x) ? G}{}_{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}{}^{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{(x) G}{}_{\mathrm{n\; ?\; 1}}{}^{\mathrm{\beta }}\text{(x) > 0, x > 0, 0 < α ? β ? α + 1}$. We also prove the inequality $\text{(n + 1) F}{}_{\mathrm{n}}{}^{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{(x) F}{}_{\mathrm{n}}{}^{\mathrm{\beta }}\text{(x) ? nF}{}_{\mathrm{n\; +\; 1}}{}^{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{(x) F}{}_{\mathrm{n\; ?\; 1}}{}^{\mathrm{\beta }}\text{(x) > A}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{[F}{}_{\mathrm{n}}{}^{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{(x)]}{}^2\text{, ?1 < x < 1, ?}\text{1}\text{2}\text{< α ? β < α + 1,}\text{where}\text{A}{}_{\mathrm{n}}$ is a positive constant depending on α and β.     

Deterministic version of Wigner's semicircle law for the distribution of matrix eigenvalues

It is proved that Wigner's semicircle law for the distribution of eigenvalues of random matrices, which is important in the statistical theory of energy levels of heavy nuclei, possesses the following completely deterministic version. Let A_n=(a_ij), 1?i, ?n, be the nth section of an infinite Hermitian matrix, {λ⁽ⁿ⁾}_1?k?n its eigenvalues, and {u_k⁽ⁿ⁾}_1?k?n the corresponding (orthonormalized column) eigenvectors. Let $\text{v}{}^1{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{=(a}{}_{\mathrm{n1}}\text{,a}{}_{\mathrm{n2}}\text{,?,a}{}_{\mathrm{n,n?1}}\text{)}$, put

$\text{X}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{(t)=[n(n-1)]}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>-1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{∑}\text{k=1}\text{[(n-1)t]}\text{|v}{}_{\mathrm{n}}{}^1\text{u}{}_{\mathrm{f}}{}^{\mathrm{(n-1)}}\text{|}{}^2\text{,}\text{0?t?1}$

(bookeeping function for the length of the projections of the new row v¹_n of A_n onto the eigenvectors of the preceding matrix A_n?1), and let finally

$\text{F}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{(x)=n}{}^{-1}\text{(}\text{number of}\text{λ}{}_{\mathrm{k}}{}^{\mathrm{(n)}}\text{?x}\text{n}\text{,1?k?n)}$

(empirical distribution function of the eigenvalues of $\text{A}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{n}$. Suppose (i) $\text{lim}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{nn}}\text{n}\text{=0}$, (ii) lim_nX_n(t)=Ct(0<C<∞,0?t?1). Then

$\text{F}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{?W(·,C)}\text{(n→∞)}$

,where W is absolutely continuous with (semicircle) density

$\text{w(x,C)=}\text{(2Cπ)}{}^{-1}\text{(4C-x}{}^2{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{for}\text{|x|?2}\text{C}\text{0}\text{for}\text{|x|?2}\text{C}$

     

Capacitance and the conformal module of quadrilaterals

Let ? be defined on T^r and have an absolutely convergent Fourier series

. Set $\text{∥?∥ = ∑ ¦?}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{¦}$. In this paper the problem of determining the limit of $\text{∥?}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{∥}$, as n → ∞, is studied.     

A remark on the tail probability of a distribution

Let {X_n}_n≥1 be a sequence of independent and identically distributed random variables. For each integer n ≥ 1 and positive constants r, t, and ?, let S_n = Σ_j=1ⁿX_j and $\text{E{N}{}_{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{(r, t, ?)} = Σ}{}_{\mathrm{n=1}}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{n}{}^{\mathrm{r?2}}\text{P{|S}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{| > ?n}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>r</mtext><mtext>t</mtext>}}\text{}}$. In this paper, we prove that (1) lim_?→0+?^α(r?1)E{N_∞(r, t, ?)} = K(r, t) if E(X₁) = 0, Var(X₁) = 1, and E(| X₁ |^t) < ∞, where 2 ≤ t < 2r ≤ 2t, $\text{K(r, t) =}\text{{2}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>\alpha (r?1)</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{Γ(}\text{(1 + α(r ? 1))}\text{2}\text{)}}\text{{(r ? 1) Γ(}\text{1}\text{2}\text{)}}$, and $\text{α =}\text{2t}\text{(2r ? t)}$; (2) $\text{lim}{}_{\mathrm{?\to 0+}}\text{G(t, ?)}\text{H(t, ?)}\text{= 0}$ if 2 < t < 4, E(X₁) = 0, Var(X₁) > 0, and E(|X₁|^t) < ∞, where G(t, ?) = E{N_∞(t, t, ?)} = Σ_n=1^∞n^t?2P{| S_n | > ?n} → ∞ as ? → 0+ and $\text{H(t, ?) = E{N}{}_{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{(t, t, ?)} = Σ}{}_{\mathrm{n=1}}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{n}{}^{\mathrm{t?2}}\text{P{| S}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{| > ?n}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>2</mtext><mtext>t</mtext>}}\text{} → ∞}\text{as}\text{? → 0+}$, i.e., H(t, ?) goes to infinity much faster than G(t, ?) as ? → 0+ if 2 < t < 4, E(X₁) = 0, Var(X₁) > 0, and E(| X₁ |^t) < ∞. Our results provide us with a much better and deeper understanding of the tail probability of a distribution.