Exemplary mathematics instruction and its development in selected education systems in East Asia

What may teachers do in developing and carrying out exemplary or high-quality mathematics classroom instruction? What can we learn from teachers’ instructional practices that are often culturally valued in different education systems? In this article, we aim to highlight relevant issues that have long been interests of mathematics educators worldwide in identifying and examining teachers’ practices in high-quality mathematics classroom instruction, and outline what articles published herein can help further our understanding of such issues with cases of exemplary mathematics instruction valued in the Chinese Mainland, Hong Kong, Japan, Singapore, South Korea, and Taiwan.     

Characterizing exemplary mathematics instruction in Japanese classrooms from the learner’s perspective

This paper aims to examine key characteristics of exemplary mathematics instruction in Japanese classrooms. The selected findings of large-scale international studies of classroom practices in mathematics are reviewed for discussing the uniqueness of how Japanese teachers structure and deliver their lessons and what Japanese teachers value in their instruction from a teacher’s perspective. Then an analysis of post-lesson video-stimulated interviews with 60 students in three “well-taught” eighth-grade mathematics classrooms in Tokyo is reported to explore the learners’ views on what constitutes a “good” mathematics lesson. The co-constructed nature of quality mathematics instruction that focus on the role of students’ thinking in the classroom is discussed by recasting the characteristics of how lessons are structured and delivered and what experienced teachers tend to value in their instruction from the learner’s perspective. Valuing students’ thinking as necessary elements to be incorporated into the development of a lesson is the key to the approach taken by Japanese teachers to develop and maintain quality mathematics instruction.     

Pursuing excellence in mathematics classroom instruction through exemplary lesson development in China: a case study

In this article, we aim to examine the features of mathematics classroom instruction excellence valued in China. The popular approach to pursuing mathematics classroom instruction excellence through exemplary lesson development is also investigated to demonstrate the nature of teaching culture that has been advocated and nurtured in China. Features of an exemplary lesson are analyzed in detail, and the practicing teacher’s experience through participating in the development of the exemplary lesson is examined as well. Finally, the implications of developing exemplary lessons for pursuing excellence in mathematics classroom instruction as a culturally valued approach in China are also discussed.     

Online education for in-service secondary teachers and the incorporation of mathematics technology in the classroom

This paper reviews existing research on how in-service high school teachers have learned about, worked on or thought about the incorporation of mathematics technology into their teaching practices. The paper reviews different scenarios of instruction issuing from important research related to teacher professional development. Specifically, we will deal with contributions to online in-service mathematics teacher education that refer to the use of digital technologies in classroom teaching practices. The different articles reviewed belong to a range of teams of researchers from several universities and countries, and who have implemented distinct online education approaches. That work has allowed the gaining of knowledge on the specificities of using Web 2.0 tools for mathematics professional development (MPD), the function that online teacher interaction has in teacher learning, and the actual classroom conditions in which mathematics technology is incorporated into instructional practice. This paper describes and discusses the design features of those approaches emphasizing the main concepts and their underpinning theoretical frames, noting important design elements, and specific results. Finally, the paper discusses how some of these research findings are connected with emergent issues in the field of MPD.     

Shaping assessment through instructional innovation

How do changes in mathematics instruction shape the kind of assessment practices teacher use? This qualitative study examined the assessment beliefs and practices of four middle school mathematics teachers implementing a reformed mathematics curriculum for the first time. Through observations of classroom interaction, teacher interviews, and analysis of instructional documents, we charted the beginnings of change in the types of assessment information these teachers found valuable. Constraints on change in assessment included time available to develop, implement, and interpret alternative assessments, as well as parent and student beliefs about what it meant to do well in mathematics. Tightening the link between curriculum and assessment involves more than excellent curriculum materials—it will require support from multiple audiences and broadening beliefs about what it means to do and know mathematics.     

Mathematics classroom instruction excellence through the platform of teaching contests

In this study, we aimed to examine features of mathematics classroom instruction excellence identified and valued through teaching contests in the Chinese mainland. By taking a case study approach, we focused on a prize-winning lesson as an exemplary lesson that was awarded the top prize in teaching contests at both the district and the city level. The analyses of the exemplary lesson itself revealed important features on the lesson’s content treatment, students’ engagement, and the use of multiple methods to facilitate students’ learning. These features are consistent with what the contest evaluation committees valued and what seven other mathematics expert teachers focused in their comments. The Chinese teaching culture in identifying and promoting classroom instruction excellence is then discussed in a broader context.     

Mathematics teaching practices with technology that support conceptual understanding for Latino/a students

We analyze how three seventh grade mathematics teachers from a majority Latino/a, linguistically diverse region of Texas taught the same lesson on interpreting graphs of motion as part of the Scaling Up SimCalc study (Roschelle et al., 2010). The students of two of the teachers made strong learning gains as measured by a curriculum-aligned assessment, while the students of the third teacher were less successful. To investigate these different outcomes, we compare the teaching practices in each classroom, focusing on the teachers’ use of class time and instructional format, their use of mathematical discourse practices in whole-class discussions, and their responses to student contributions. We show that the more successful teachers allowed time for students to use the curriculum and software and discuss it with peers, that they used formal mathematical discourse along with less formal language, and that they responded to student errors using higher-level moves. We conclude by discussing implications for teachers and mathematics educators, with special attention to issues related to the mathematics education of Latinos/as.     

Hong Kong teachers’ views of effective mathematics teaching and learning

Twelve experienced mathematics teachers in Hong Kong were invited to face-to-face semi-structured interviews to express their views about mathematics, about mathematics learning and about the teacher and teaching. Mathematics was generally regarded as a subject that is practical, logical, useful and involves thinking. In view of the abstract nature of the subject, the teachers took abstract thinking as the goal of mathematics learning. They reflected that it is not just a matter of “how” and “when”, but one should build a path so that students can proceed from the concrete to the abstract. Their conceptions of mathematics understanding were tapped. Furthermore, the roles of memorisation, practices and concrete experiences were discussed, in relation with understanding. Teaching for understanding is unanimously supported and along this line, the characteristics of an effective mathematics lesson and of an effective mathematics teacher were discussed. Though many of the participants realize that there is no fixed rule for good practices, some of the indicators were put forth. To arrive at an effective mathematics lesson, good preparation, basic teaching skills and good relationship with the students are prerequisite.     

Japanese and American teachers' evaluations of mathematics lessons: A new technique for exploring beliefs

In our study, we use a novel technique to explore the beliefs of Japanese and American elementary school teachers. Four American and four Japanese teachers watched a mathematics lesson—videotaped in either Nagano, Japan or Chicago, Illinois—and commented on the lesson's strengths and weaknesses. The major pedagogical issues that differentiated the teachers' comments were: what students should do during a lesson, how instructors should use language, how instructors should pace lessons and address ability differences, and how instructional materials should be used. The specific beliefs of the American and Japanese teachers in this study mapped easily onto common instructional practices in elementary school mathematics classes in the United States and Japan. We conclude that, at least for the teachers in this sample, beliefs are linked to practices and they may help to tie teachers to their culturally preferred method of mathematics instruction.     

The Impact of Enacted Mathematics Curriculum Models on Prospective Elementary Teachers' Course Perceptions and Beliefs

This paper communicates the impact of prospective teachers' learning of mathematics using novel curriculum materials in an innovative classroom setting. Two sections of a mathematics content course for prospective elementary teachers used different text materials and instructional approaches. The primary mathematical authorities were the instructor and text in the textbook section and the prospective teachers in the curriculum materials section. After one semester, teachers in the curriculum materials section (n= 34) placed significantly more importance on classroom group work and discussions, less on instructor lecture and explanation, and less on textbooks having practice problems, examples, and explanations. They valued student exploration over practice. In the textbook section (n= 19), there was little change in the teachers' beliefs, in which practice was valued over exploration. These results highlight the positive impact of experiences with innovative curriculum materials on prospective elementary teachers' beliefs about mathematics instruction.     

STEM Teachers' Planned and Enacted Attempts at Implementing Engineering Design‐Based Instruction

This study investigates grades 5 and 6 science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) teachers' planned and actualized engineering design‐based instruction, the instruments used to characterize their efforts, and the implications this work has for teachers' implementations of an integrated approach to STEM education. Participants included 23 STEM teachers from six schools (three rural, two suburban, and one urban). Data were gathered via lesson implementation plans and classroom observations. Teachers demonstrated strength in planning for standards‐ and engineering design‐based lessons, incorporating engineering practices within their respective implementation plans, and aligning their plans with content and design process standards. Missing from their plans was attention to science concepts and their placement, use, and application within a design task. Classroom observations indicated that the teacher participants gave priority to “front loading,” the design process by concentrating more of their instructional time on problem identification and planning and less time on testing designs, communicating performance results, and redesigning. Measures utilized in this study provided insight into the content of teachers' planning and subsequent instruction and suggest potential for capturing content planning in the context of classrooms in which teachers are attempting to integrate novel curriculum, such as the new standards for engineering practices.     

Science and Mathematics Instruction in a Reform‐based Teacher Preparation Program

This study examined the science and mathematics instruction of teachers who were initially prepared by the Collaboratives for Excellence in Teacher Preparation program (CETP). The focus of this study was on examining the extent to which science and mathematics teachers used more reform‐oriented instructional practices in their classes when they entered the teaching profession. Data were gathered from twelve different CETP projects across the United States. A quasi‐experimental design was used where science and mathematics teachers who were initially prepared by the CETP program were followed into the field and compared to teachers who were not prepared by the CETP program. The results indicate that the teachers prepared by the CETP program used slightly more reform‐oriented instructional practices than teachers who were not prepared by the CETP program, although both mathematics and science teachers reported low levels of reform‐oriented instruction. Implications of results for large‐scale reform of science and mathematics teacher preparation are discussed.     

Teaching values and valued teaching in the mathematics classroom: toward a research agenda

In this paper, we first discuss the teaching of values by focusing on the kinds of values that have been discussed and studied in the other papers in this special journal issue and elsewhere. Then we raise a number of issues about the product-based values in mathematics education, which we identify as teaching values and which can be realized through classroom instruction. In the second section, we discuss the process-based valued teaching methods used to maximize the realization of the teaching values in the classroom. As valued teaching may be perceived differently by different people, in the discussion we analyze how it is seen from both students?? and teachers?? perspectives. We end this paper by discussing a number of methodological issues in studying teaching values and valued teaching as well as offering suggestions for future research.     

Building bridges within mathematics education: Teaching, research, and instructional design

Within mathematics education, classroom teachers, educational researchers, and instructional designers share the common goals of understanding and improving the teaching and learning of mathematics. Teachers work to help students learn; researchers study how people learn and teach mathematics; and designers develop instructional materials to support teachers and students. Each community (of teachers, of researchers, and of designers) develops its own perspectives, methods, and expertise. Too seldom, however, do practitioners have the opportunity to share their knowledge across communities. This first-person, retrospective case study speaks to the challenges and rewards of building bridges among these three communities by charting the evolution of an instructional activity (using graphing software to explore slope) through four cycles of teaching, research, and design. Initially separate, the three perspectives of teacher, researcher, and designer begin to interact as the worksite moves from the university laboratory to the author's classroom and then to other teachers’ classrooms. Many of these interactions are fruitful, resulting in new insights and strategies that strengthen the final product and inform the practitioner. At the same time, some tensions arise, particularly between teaching and research, highlighting fundamental differences between these fields. Lessons from this case study suggest implications for collaborations among teachers, researchers, and designers.     

Teachers' Considerations of Students' Thinking During Mathematics Lesson Design

Teachers' abilities to design mathematics lessons are related to their capability to mobilize resources to meeting intended learning goals based on their noticing. In this process, knowing how teachers consider Students' thinking is important for understanding how they are making decisions to promote student learning. While teaching, what teachers notice influences their decision‐making process. This article explores the mathematics lesson planning practices of four 4th‐grade teachers at the same school to understand how their consideration of Students' learning influences planning decisions. Case study methodology was used to gain an in‐depth perspective of the mathematics planning practices of the teachers. Results indicate the teachers took varying approaches in how they considered students. One teacher adapted instruction based on Students' conceptual understanding, two teachers aimed at producing skill‐efficient students, and the final teacher regulated learning with a strict adherence to daily lessons in curriculum materials, with little emphasis on student understanding. These findings highlight the importance of providing professional development support to teachers focused on their noticing and considerations of Students' mathematical understandings as related to learning outcomes. These findings are distinguished from other studies because of the focus on how teachers consider Students' thinking during lesson planning. This article features a Research to Practice Companion Article . Please click on the supporting information link below to access.     

Analysis of elements that support implementation of high-quality engineering design within the elementary classroom

One model of engineering integration that has shown promise is the use of engineering design as a context to support teachers as they conceptualize and plan integrated STEM lessons. However, integrating engineering into science instruction presents a number of challenges, especially at the elementary level, and the implementation of high-quality engineering design-based instruction is not often what is actualized in the classroom. This study investigated how teachers operationalized an engineering design-based lesson in their classroom by examining what elements of engineering teachers chose to include within in their lesson plan and enact in the classroom. Participants included 20 triads composed of teachers, student teachers, and engineering graduate students. Utilizing a multiple case study approach, this study found that there were four main groupings related to how teachers operationalized engineering design-based instruction in their classrooms. Results suggest that even though there were several engineering design elements that were included in a majority of the lesson plans, such as context, constraints, materials exploration, and building, and testing solutions, some characteristics were found to be more influential than others when looking at how to help teachers to implement high-quality engineering design-based instruction.     

Progressive, classical or balanced— A look at mathematical learning environments in Swiss-German lower-secondary schools

In a national supplement to TIMSS, lower-secondary school teachers (N=102) and their students (N=975) reported on mathematics instruction by means of a teacher questionnaire (teaching-learning methods, instructional sub-goals, facilitated student activities, achievement assessment, teacher role) and a student questionnaire (teachers' instructional proficiency, classroom climate). A cluster analysis performed on the ratings of teaching-learning methods yielded a solution with three clusters referred to as progressive, classical, and balanced learning environment. Cluster-related differences in facilitated student activities, achievement evaluation and preferred teacher role were found but not in instructional sub-goals. Students from different learning environments equally approved teachers' instructional proficiency and classroom climate and also had similar TIMSS mathematics scores. The results of this study provide empirical evidence that in addition to classical teacher-centered learning environments there seem to exist more diversified and studentcentered learning environments that address the needs for students to direct their own learning, communicate and work with others, and develop ways of dealing with complex problems. In line with the research literature it was also found that high mathematics achievement is not restricted to a certain type of learning environment.     

Teachers' Understandings of Realistic Contexts to Capitalize on Students' Prior Knowledge

The theory of realistic mathematics education establishes that framing mathematics problems in realistic contexts can provide opportunities for guided reinvention. Using data from a study group, I examine geometry teachers' perspectives regarding realistic contexts during a lesson study cycle. I ask the following. (a) What are the participants' perspectives regarding realistic contexts that elicit students' prior knowledge? (b) How are the participants' perspectives of realistic contexts related to teachers' instructional obligations? (c) How do the participants draw upon these perspectives when designing a lesson? The participants identified five characteristics that are needed for realistic contexts: providing entry points to mathematics, using “catchy” and “youthful” contexts, selecting personal contexts for the students, using contexts that are not “too fake” or “forced,” and connecting to the lesson's mathematical content. These characteristics largely relate to the institutional, interpersonal, and individual obligations with some connections with the disciplinary obligation. The participants considered these characteristics when identifying a realistic context for a problem‐based lesson. The context promoted mathematical connections. In addition, the teachers varied the context to increase the relevance for their students. The study has implications for supporting teachers' implementation of problem‐based instruction by attending to teachers' perspectives regarding the obligations shaping their work.     

The examination of a vignette activity sequence in a secondary mathematics methods course

Because of their brief nature, vignettes are a strategic way to highlight or explore complex instructional practices. Using a qualitative approach, we examined how the use of vignettes in a Vignette Activity Sequence contributed to secondary mathematics preservice teachers’ understanding of the Mathematical Practices and the Mathematics Teaching Practices. By examining three vignettes used in two iterations of a secondary mathematics methods course, the researchers found that preservice teachers were able to draw connections between the vignettes and their own teaching experiences. However, some misconceptions or incomplete understandings related to the practices were revealed. Preservice teachers sometimes provided vague evidence when identifying particular practices in the vignettes that did not clearly indicate if they understood the practices. Taken together, the researchers found the Vignette Activity Sequence to be a valuable formative assessment that could be used to inform instruction in a secondary mathematics methods course. These findings have implications for teacher preparation programs and mathematics teacher educators.     

Distinguishing between mathematics classrooms in Australia, China, Japan, Korea and the USA through the lens of the distribution of responsibility for knowledge generation: public oral interactivity and mathematical orality

The research reported in this paper examined spoken mathematics in particular well-taught classrooms in Australia, China (both Shanghai and Hong Kong), Japan, Korea and the USA from the perspective of the distribution of responsibility for knowledge generation in order to identify similarities and differences in classroom practice and the implicit pedagogical principles that underlie those practices. The methodology of the Learner’s Perspective Study documented the voicing of mathematical ideas in public discussion and in teacher–student conversations and the relative priority accorded by different teachers to student oral contributions to classroom activity. Significant differences were identified among the classrooms studied, challenging simplistic characterisations of ‘the Asian classroom’ as enacting a single pedagogy, and suggesting that, irrespective of cultural similarities, local pedagogies reflect very different assumptions about learning and instruction. We have employed spoken mathematical terms as a form of surrogate variable, possibly indicative of the location of the agency for knowledge generation in the various classrooms studied (but also of interest in itself). The analysis distinguished one classroom from another on the basis of “public oral interactivity” (the number of utterances in whole class and teacher–student interactions in each lesson) and “mathematical orality” (the frequency of occurrence of key mathematical terms in each lesson). Classrooms characterized by high public oral interactivity were not necessarily sites of high mathematical orality. In particular, the results suggest that one characteristic that might be identified with a national norm of practice could be the level of mathematical orality: relatively high mathematical orality characterising the mathematics classes in Shanghai with some consistency, while lessons studied in Seoul and Hong Kong consistently involved much less frequent spoken mathematical terms. The relative contributions of teacher and students to this spoken mathematics provided an indication of how the responsibility for knowledge generation was shared between teacher and student in those classrooms. Specific analysis of the patterns of interaction by which key mathematical terms were introduced or solicited revealed significant differences. It is suggested that the empirical investigation of mathematical orality and its likely connection to the distribution of the responsibility for knowledge generation and to student learning ourcomes are central to the development of any theory of mathematics instruction and learning.