Syntheses,structures and electrochemical properties of ruthenium(II/III) complexes with tetradentate Schiff base ligands

Three unsymmetrical tetradentate Schiff base ligands, H₂salipn, H₂salipn-Br₄ and H₂salipn-Cl₂, have been synthesized from the typical condensation reactions of treating 1,2-diaminopropane with salicylaldehyde, 3,5-dibromosalicylaldehyde and 5-chlorosalicylaldehyde, respectively. Treatment of [RuCl₂(PPh₃)₃] with one equivalent of H₂salipn or H₂salipn-Br₄ in the presence of triethylamine in tetrahydrofuran (THF) afforded the corresponding ruthenium(III) complexes [Ru^IIICl(PPh₃)(salipn)] (1) and [Ru^IIICl(PPh₃)(salipn-Br₄)] (2). Interaction of [RuHCl(CO)(PPh₃)₃] with one equivalent of H₂salipn-Cl₂ or H₂salipn-Br₄ under the same conditions led to isolation of ruthenium(II) complexes [Ru^II(CO)(PPh₃)(salalipn-Cl₂)] (3) and [Ru^II(CO)(PPh₃)(salalipn-Br₄)] (4), respectively, in which one of the imine bonds was nucleophilically attacked by hydride to result in the formation of a mixed imine-amine ligand. The molecular structures of 1?1.5CH₂Cl₂, 2, 3?0.5CH₂Cl₂ and 4 have been determined by single-crystal X-ray crystallography. The electrochemical properties of 1–4 were also investigated. Their cyclic voltammograms displayed quasi-reversible Ru(IV)/Ru(III) and Ru(III)/Ru(II) couples with E^o ranging from 0.67 to 1.05 V and 0.74 to 0.80 V vs. Ag/AgCl (0.1 M), respectively.     

Preparation and StructuralCharacterization of RuII‐DMSO and RuIII‐DMSO‐substituted α‐Keggin‐type Phosphotungstates, [PW11O39RuIIDMSO]5– and [PW11O39RuIIIDMSO]4–, and Catalytic Activity for Water Oxidation

Ru^II‐ and Ru^III‐substituted α‐Keggin‐type phosphotungstates with a dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) ligand, [PW₁₁O₃₉Ru^IIDMSO]^5– ( 1 ) and [PW₁₁O₃₉Ru^IIIDMSO]^4– ( 2 ), were synthesized. Compound 1 was prepared by reaction of [PW₁₁O₃₉]^7– with [Ru^II(DMSO)₄]Cl₂ in water at 125 °C under hydrothermal conditions and was isolated as a cesium salt. Compound 2 was prepared by reaction of 1 with bromine in water at 60 °C and was isolated as a cesium salt. The compounds were characterized by cyclic voltammetry, elemental analysis, UV/Vis, IR,³¹P NMR, ¹⁸³W NMR, ¹H NMR, and XANES (Ru K‐edge and L₃‐edge)spectroscopic methods. Single crystal structural analysis of 1 revealed that Ru^II is incorporated in the α‐Keggin framework and coordinated by DMSO through a Ru–S bond. Cyclic voltammetry of 1 indicated that the incorporated Ru^II‐DMSO is reversibly oxidizable to the Ru^III‐DMSO derivative 2 . Compound 1 showed catalytic activity for water oxidation in the presence of cerium ammonium nitrate as an oxidant.     

Ketimido Metallophthalocyanines: An Approach to Phthalocyanine‐Supported Mononuclear High‐Valent Ruthenium Complexes

A “metal–ketimine+ArI(OR)₂” approach has been developed for preparing metal–ketimido complexes, and ketimido ligands are found to stabilize high‐valent metallophthalocyanine (M? Pc) complexes such as ruthenium(IV) phthalocyanines. Treatment of bis(ketimine) ruthenium(II) phthalocyanines [Ru^II(Pc)(HN?CPh₂)₂] ( 1a ) and [Ru^II(Pc)(HNQu)₂] ( 1b ; HNQu=N‐phenyl‐1,4‐benzoquinonediimine) with PhI(OAc)₂ affords bis(ketimido) ruthenium(IV) phthalocyanines [Ru^IV(Pc)(N?CPh₂)₂] ( 2a ) and [Ru^IV(Pc)(NQu)₂] ( 2b ), respectively. X‐ray crystal structures of 1b and [Ru^II(Pc)(PhN?CHPh)₂] ( 1c ) show Ru? N(ketimine) distances of 2.075(4) and 2.115(3) Å, respectively. Complexes 2a , 2b readily revert to 1a , 1b upon treatment with phenols. ¹H NMR spectroscopy reveals that 2a , 2b are diamagnetic and 2b exists as two isomers, consistent with a proposed eclipsed orientation of the ketimido ligands in these ruthenium(IV) complexes. The reaction of 1a , 1b with PhI(OAc)₂ to afford 2a , 2b suggests the utility of ArI(OR)₂ as an oxidative deprotonation agent for the generation of high‐valent metal complexes featuring M? N bonds with multiple bonding characters. DFT and time‐dependent (TD)‐DFT calculations have been performed on the electronic structures and the UV/Vis absorption spectra of 1b and 2b , which provide support for the diamagnetic nature of 2b and reveal a significant barrier for rotation of the ketimido group about the Ru? N(ketimido) bond.     

Bridging function mediated intermetallic coupling in diruthenium- bis (bipyridine) complexes

The interactions of potentially dinucleating bridging functionalities (I–VI) with the ruthenium-bis(bypyridine) precursor [Ru^II(bpy)₂(EtOH)₂]²⁺have been explored. The bridging functionsI,II andVI directly result in the expected dinuclear complexes of the type [(bpy)₂Ru^IILⁿRu^II(bpy)₂]^z+ (1,2,7 and 8) (n = 0,z =4 andn = -2,z = 2). The bridging ligandIII undergoes N-N or N-C bond cleavage reaction on coordination to the Ru^II(bpy)₂ core which eventually yields a mononuclear complex of the type [(bpy)₂Ru^II(L)]⁺,3, where L =^-OC₆H₃(R)C(R′)=N-H. However, the electrogenerated mononuclear ruthenium(III) congener, 3⁺in acetonitrile dimerises to [(bpy)₂Ru^III {^-OC₆H₃(R)C(R′)=N-N=(R′)C(R)C₆H₃O^-}Ru^III(bpy)₂]⁴⁺ (4). In the presence of a slight amount of water content in the acetonitrile solvent the dimeric species (4) reduces back to the starting ruthenium(II) monomer (3). The preformed bridging ligandIV undergoes multiple transformations on coordination to the Ru(bpy)₂ core, such as hydrolysis of the imine groups ofIV followed by intermolecular head-to-tail oxidative coupling of the resultant amino phenol moieties, which in turn results in a new class of dimeric complex of the type [(bpy)₂Ru^{II -}OC₆H₄-N=C₆H₃(=NH)O^-Ru^II(bpy)₂]²⁺ (5). In5, the bridging ligand comprises of twoN,O chelating binding sites each formally in the semiquinone level and there is ap-benzoquinonediimine bridge between the metal centres. In complex6, the preformed bridging ligand, 3,6-bis(3,5-dimethylpyrazol-1-yl)-1,2-dihydro-1,2,4,5-tetrazine, H₂L (V) undergoes oxidative dehydrogenation to aromatic tetrazine based bridging unit, 3,6-bis(3,5-dimethylpyrazol-1-yl)-1,2,4,5-tetrazine, L. The detailed spectroelectrochemical aspects of the complexes have been studied in order to understand the role of the bridging units towards the intermetallic electronic coupling in the dinuclear complexes.     

Density Functional Theory Calculations on Oxidative CC Bond Cleavage and NO Bond Formation of [RuII(bpy)2(diamine)]2+ via Reactive Ruthenium Imide Intermediates

DFT calculations are performed on [Ru^II(bpy)₂(tmen)]²⁺ ( M1 , tmen=2,3‐dimethyl‐2,3‐butanediamine) and [Ru^II(bpy)₂(heda)]²⁺ ( M2 , heda=2,5‐dimethyl‐2,5‐hexanediamine), and on the oxidation reactions of M1 to give the C?C bond cleavage product [Ru^II(bpy)₂(NH=CMe₂)₂]²⁺ ( M3 ) and the N?O bond formation product [Ru^II(bpy)₂(ONCMe₂CMe₂NO)]²⁺ ( M4 ). The calculated geometrical parameters and oxidation potentials are in good agreement with the experimental data. As revealed by the DFT calculations, [Ru^II(bpy)₂(tmen)]²⁺ ( M1 ) can undergo oxidative deprotonation to generate Ru‐bis(imide) [Ru(bpy)₂(tmen‐4 H)]⁺ ( A ) or Ru‐imide/amide [Ru(bpy)₂(tmen‐3 H)]²⁺ ( A′ ) intermediates. Both A and A′ are prone to C?C bond cleavage, with low reaction barriers (ΔG^≠) of 6.8 and 2.9 kcal mol^?1 for their doublet spin states ² A and ² A′ , respectively. The calculated reaction barrier for the nucleophilic attack of water molecules on ² A′ is relatively high (14.2 kcal mol^?1). These calculation results are in agreement with the formation of the Ru^II‐bis(imine) complex M3 from the electrochemical oxidation of M1 in aqueous solution. The oxidation of M1 with Ce^IV in aqueous solution to afford the Ru^II‐dinitrosoalkane complex M4 is proposed to proceed by attack of the cerium oxidant on the ruthenium imide intermediate. The findings of ESI‐MS experiments are consistent with the generation of a ruthenium imide intermediate in the course of the oxidation.     

Comparative Study of Ruthenium(II) and Ruthenium(III) Complexes with the Ligand dmbpy (dmbpy = 4, 4′‐Dimethyl‐2, 2′‐bipyridine)

The complex cis‐[Ru^III(dmbpy)₂Cl₂](PF₆) ( 2 ) (dmbpy = 4, 4′‐dimethyl‐2, 2′‐bipyridine) was obtained from the reaction of cis‐[Ru^II(dmbpy)₂Cl₂] ( 1 ) with ammonium cerium(IV) nitrate followed by precipitation with saturated ammonium hexafluoridophosphate. The ¹H NMR spectrum of the Ru^III complex confirms the presence of paramagnetic metal atoms, whereas that of the Ru^II complex displays diamagnetism. The ³¹P NMR spectrum of the Ru^III complex shows one signal for the phosphorus atom of the PF₆^– ion. The perspective view of each [Ru^II/III(dmbpy)₂Cl₂]^0/+ unit manifests that the ruthenium atom is in hexacoordinate arrangement with two dmbpy ligands and two chlorido ligands in cis position. As the oxidation state of the central ruthenium metal atom becomes higher, the average Ru–Cl bond length decreases whereas the Ru–N (dmbpy) bond length increases. The cis‐positioned dichloro angle in Ru^III is 1.3° wider than that in the Ru^II. The dihedral angles between pair of planar six‐membered pyridyl ring in the dmbpy ligand for the Ru^II are 4.7(5)° and 5.7(4)°. The observed inter‐planar angle between two dmbpy ligands in the Ru^II is 89.08(15)°, whereas the value for the Ru^III is 85.46(20)°.     

Ruthenium(II)/(III) complexes of bidentate acetyl hydrazide Schiff bases

A series of octahedral Ru^II/Ru^III complexes of the type [Ru(Y)(CO)(BAX)(PPh₃)₂] and [RuCl₂(BAX)(PPh₃)₂] (Y = H or Cl; BAX = benzaldehydeacetylhydrazone anion; X = H, Me, OMe, OH, Cl or NO₂) have been prepared and characterised by spectral, magnetic and cyclic voltammetric studies. The Ru^II complexes are low spin diamagnetic (S = 0) whereas the Ru^III complexes are low spin and paramagnetic (S = 1/2). These Ru^II and Ru^III complexes absorb in the visible region respectively at ca. 16,000 and 28,000 cm^–1 which bands are assigned to the MLCT. The correlation of the _max values of the Ru^III complexes with the ⁺ Hammett parameter, is linear, indicating the profound effect of substituents on the electron density of the central metal. I.r. spectral data reveals that the hydrazone is chelated to ruthenium through the hydrazinic nitrogen and the deprotonated enolic oxygen. The rhombic nature of the e.s.r. spectra of the Ru^III complexes indicates an asymmetry in the electronic environment around the Ru atom. Ru^II complexes in CH₂Cl₂ show an irreversible Ru^II/III redox couple at ca. 0.9–0.5 V, while the Ru^III complexes show two reversible redox couples in the –0.1–0.1 and 0.8–0.6 V range, indicating that the higher oxidation state of ruthenium is stabilised by hydrazones.     

Cubane Tellurido Clusters [Zn(NH3)4]3[Mo4Te4(CN)12] and [Cd(NH3)4]3[W4Te4(CN)12]: Syntheses and Crystal Structures

Single crystals of [Zn(NH₃)₄]₃[Mo₄Te₄(CN)₁₂] (I) and [Cd(NH₃)₄]₃[W₄Te₄(CN)₁₂] (II) were obtained by applying solutions of K₇[Mo₄Te₄(CN)₁₂] · 11H₂O and K₆[W₄Te₄(CN)₁₂] · 5H₂O in aqueous ammonia over solutions of ZnCl₂ and Cd(NO₃)₂ in glycerol and were characterized by X-ray diffraction analysis. The IR spectra and thermal properties of compounds I and II were examined.     

Ruthenium(II/III)‐Based Compounds with Encouraging Antiproliferative Activity against Non‐small‐Cell Lung Cancer

Hereby we present the synthesis of several ruthenium(II) and ruthenium(III) dithiocarbamato complexes. Proceeding from the Na[trans‐Ru^III(dmso)₂Cl₄] ( 2 ) and cis‐[Ru^II(dmso)₄Cl₂] ( 3 ) precursors, the diamagnetic, mixed‐ligand [Ru^IIL₂(dmso)₂] complexes 4 and 5 , the paramagnetic, neutral [Ru^IIIL₃] monomers 6 and 7 , the antiferromagnetically coupled ionic α‐[Ru^III₂L₅]Cl complexes 8 and 9 as well as the β‐[Ru^III₂L₅]Cl dinuclear species 10 and 11 (L=dimethyl‐ (DMDT) and pyrrolidinedithiocarbamate (PDT)) were obtained. All the compounds were fully characterised by elemental analysis as well as ¹H NMR and FTIR spectroscopy. Moreover, for the first time the crystal structures of the dinuclear β‐[Ru^III₂(dmdt)₅]BF₄ ? CHCl₃ ? CH₃CN and of the novel [Ru^IIL₂(dmso)₂] complexes were also determined and discussed. For both the mono‐ and dinuclear Ru^II and Ru^III complexes the central metal atoms assume a distorted octahedral geometry. Furthermore, in vitro cytotoxicity of the complexes has been evaluated on non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC) NCI‐H1975 cells. All the mono‐ and dinuclear Ru^III dithiocarbamato compounds (i.e., complexes 6 – 10 ) show interesting cytotoxic activity, up to one order of magnitude higher with respect to cisplatin. Otherwise, no significant antiproliferative effect for either the precursors 2 and 3 or the Ru^II complexes 4 and 5 has been observed.     

NEW DINUCLEAR ASYMMETRIC COMPLEXES OF RUTHENIUM AND RHENIUM

Abstract

New dinuclear asymmetric complexes of ruthenium and rhenium, of formula [(bpy)(CO)₃ Re^I(4,4′-bpy)Ru^II/III(NH₃)₅]^3+/4+ have been prepared and characterized by spectroscopic and electrochemical techniques. In the mixed-valent species [Re^I, Ru^III], the back electron transfer reaction Ru^II → Re^II, that occurs after light excitation, is predicted to be in the Marcus inverted region. This fact is consistent with the observed quenching of the luminiscence of the Re chromophore in [(bpy)(CO)₃Re^I(4,4′-bpy)Ru^III(NH₃)₅]⁴⁺, when compared to the parent complex [(bpy)(CO)₃Re^I(4,4′-bpy)]⁺. A theoretical treatment due to Creutz, Newton and Sutin has been successfully applied to predict the electronic coupling element in the mixed-valent complex.     

Synthesis and structural characterization of the hydrido carbido ruthenium cluster [PPh4][Ru6C(CO)16H]

According to the protonation of [PPh₄]₂[Ru₆C(CO)₁₆] (1b) withp-toluene-sulfonic acid, a hydrido ruthenium cluster [PPh₄][Ru₆C(CO)₁₆H] (3b) was obtained in 53% yield, which readily decomposed in protic solvents even at –20°C to yield1b, Ru₆C(CO)₁₆H₂, and Ru₅C(CO)₁₅. Cluster3b was characterized by single-crystal X-ray analysis. The six metal atoms are arranged in the form of an octahedron with the carbido ligand located in the center. There are 13 terminal carbonyl, three bridging carbonyl, and a bridging hydrido ligands.     

NLO active CuII/RuII and CdII/RuII coordination-organometallic complexes: synthesis,structural characterization and photoluminescence properties

Cu^II/Ru^II and Cd^II/Ru^II hybrid complexes [Cu(L_1–3)(NC₅H₄C≡CRu(dppe)₂Cl)] (1a-3a) and [Cd(L_1-3)(NC₅H₄C≡CRu(dppe)₂Cl)] (1b–3b) have been prepared by reaction of trans-[RuCl(dppe)₂(C≡C-py-3)] (1) with copper or cadmium acetate in the presence of Schiff base ligands L_H1–3 (where L_H = 2-(pyrrole-2-yl-methylidine)aminophenol (L_H1), 5-bromo-2-(pyrrole-2-yl-methylidine)aminophenol (L_H2) and 5-nitro-2-(pyrrole-2-yl-methylidine)aminophenol (L_H3)). The hybrid materials were characterized on the basis of elemental analyses, TEM, IR, UV–visible, ¹H NMR, and ³¹P NMR spectral studies. TEM overview observations revealed well-dispersed spherical nanoparticles of ~60 nm are formed. Quasireversible redox behavior is observed for Cu^II/Ru^II complexes corresponding to Cu^I/Cu^II and Ru^II/Ru^III couples. All the complexes exhibit blue-green emission as a result of fluorescence from the intraligand (π → π*) emission excited state with good quantum yield. The second-order nonlinear optical (NLO) properties of Cu^II/Ru^II and Cd^II/Ru^II complexes have been investigated by the Kurtz-powder method. The second harmonic generation efficiency of these complexes show that these complexes are NLO active and display good second-order nonlinear optical activity.     

A Diruthenium Complex of an N-Pyridyl-o-aminophenol Derivative: A Route to Mixed Valency

An N-pyridyl-o-aminophenol derivative that stabilises mixed-valence states of ruthenium ions is disclosed. A diruthenium complex, [(L_IQ⁰)Ru₂Cl₅] ⋅ MeOH ( 1⋅ MeOH) is successfully isolated, in which L_IQ⁰ is the o-iminobenzoquinone form of 2-[(3-nitropyridin-2-yl)amino]phenol (L_APH₂). In 1 , L_IQ⁰ oriented towards one ruthenium centre is a non-innocent NO-donor redox ligand, whereas another oriented towards another ruthenium centre is an innocent pyridine-donor redox ligand. Complex 1 is a diruthenium(II,III) mixed-valence complex, [Ru^II(L_IQ⁰)(μ-Cl)₂Ru^III], with a minor contribution from the diruthenium(III,III) state. [Ru^III(L_ISQ^.−)(μ-Cl)₂Ru^III] contains L_ISQ^.−, which is the o-iminobenzosemiquinonate anion radical form of the ligand. Complexes 1 ⁻ and 1 ⁺ are diruthenium(II,II), [Ru^II(L_IQ⁰)(μ-Cl)₂Ru^II], and diruthenium(III,III), [Ru^III(L_IQ⁰)(μ-Cl)₂Ru^III], complexes, respectively, of L_IQ⁰. Complex 1 ²⁻ is a diruthenium(II,II) complex of the o-iminobenzosemiquinonate anion radical (L_ISQ^.−), [Ru^II(L_ISQ^.−)(μ-Cl)₂Ru^II], with a minor contribution from the diruthenium(III,II) form, [Ru^III(L_AP²⁻)(μ-Cl)₂Ru^II]. Complex 1 ²⁺ is a diruthenium(III,IV) mixed-valence complex of L_IQ⁰, [Ru^III(L_IQ⁰)(μ-Cl)₂Ru^IV]. Complexes 1 and 1 ²⁺ exhibit inter-valence charge-transfer transitions at λ=1300 and 1370 nm, respectively.     

Pyridine-2-olato chelated ruthenium(II) organometallics incorporating imine-phenol function: spectroscopic,structural, electrochemical,and theoretical studies

The heterogeneous phase reaction of excess sodium salt of 2-hydroxypyridine (OHpy) with [Ru(κ²C,O-RL)(PPh₃)₂(CO)Cl] (1) afforded complexes of the type [Ru(κ¹C-RL)(PPh₃)₂(CO)(Opy)] (2) in excellent yield [κ²C,O-RL is 4-methyl-6-((N-R-arylimino)methyl)phenolato-C²,O), κ¹C-RL is 4-methyl-6-((N-R-arylimino)methyl)phenol-C²) and R is H, Me, OMe, Cl]. The chelation of Opy is attended with the cleavage of Ru-O and Ru-Cl bonds and iminium-phenolato → imine-phenol prototropic shift. The 1→2 conversion is irreversible and the type 2 species are thermodynamically more stable than the acetate, nitrite, and nitrate complexes of 1. The spectral (UV-vis, IR, NMR) and electrochemical data of the complexes are reported. In dichloromethane solution the complexes display one quasi-reversible Ru^III/Ru^II cyclic voltammetric response with E_1/2 in the range 0.65–0.69 V versus Ag/AgCl. The crystal and molecular structures of [Ru(κ¹C-HL)(PPh₃)₂(CO)(Opy)]·2C₆H₆·0.5H₂O, 2(H)·2C₆H₆·0.5H₂O and [Ru(κ¹C-ClL)(PPh₃)₂(CO)(Opy)]·2C₆H₆·0.25H₂O, 2(Cl)·2C₆H₆·0.25H₂O are reported, which revealed a distorted octahedral RuC₂P₂NO coordination sphere. The pairs (P,P), (C,O), and (C,N) define the three trans directions. The electronic structures of the complexes are also scrutinized by density functional theory.     

A new family of magnetic 2D coordination polymers based on [MV(CN)8]3− (M=Mo,W) and pre-programmed Cu2+ centres

The self-assembly of [M(CN)₈]³⁻ (M=Mo, W) anion and polyamine complexes of Cu^II[Cu(tetren)]²⁺ and [Cu(dien)(H₂O)₂]²⁺ (tetren=tetraethylenepentamine, dien=diethylenetriamine) in acidic aqueous solution gives (tetrenH₅)_0.8{Cu^II ₄[W^V(CN)₈]₄}·7.2H₂O 1, (tetrenH₅)_0.8{Cu^II ₄[Mo^V(CN)₈]₄}·7.2H₂O 2, (dienH₃){Cu^II ₃[W^V(CN)₈]₃}·4H₂O 3 and (dienH₃){Cu^II ₃[Mo^V(CN)₈]₃}·4H₂O 4 2D coordination polymers. All compounds are structure-related: the crystal structures of isomorphous 1–2 and 3–4, respectively, consist of double-layered cyano-bridged {Cu^II[W^V(CN)₈]⁻}_n square grid backbones and non-coordinated fully protonated polyamine countercations as well as H₂O molecules located between the sheets. The magnetic measurements reveal long range ferromagnetic ordering with sharp phase transitions at T_C in range 28–37 K and coercivity in range 30–225 Oe at liquid helium temperature, T=4.3 K.     

Binuclear ruthenium complexes containing mPTA and alkyl-bis(8-thiotheophylline) derivatives (mPTA = N-methyl-1,3,5-triaza-7-phosphaadamantane)

The water-soluble complex [RuClCp(PPh₃)(mPTA)](CF₃SO₃) reacts with the thiopurines, bis(S-8-thiotheophylline)methane (MBTTH₂), 1,2-bis(S-8-thiotheophylline)ethane (EBTTH₂), and 1,3-bis(S-8-thiotheophylline)propane (PBTTH₂), to lead to the binuclear ruthenium(II) complexes [{RuCp(PPh₃)(mPTA)}₂-μ-(L-κS7,S′7)](CF₃SO₃)₂ where (L = MBTT^2? (1), EBTT^2? (2), and PBTT^2? (3)). All the complexes have been fully characterized by elemental analysis, IR, and multinuclear ¹H, ¹³C{¹H}, and ³¹P{¹H} NMR spectroscopy. The cyclic voltammetry of the complexes is characterized by two one-electron oxidative responses (Ru^II–Ru^II/Ru^III–Ru^II; Ru^III–Ru^II/Ru^III–Ru^III) that increase their redox potential when the bis(8-thiotheophylline)-alkyl-bridge growths. The reactivity against DNA and partition coefficient of the complexes were also determined.