Structure and magnetic ordering of KxH1-xNi(OH2)4[Ru2(CO3)4].zH2O

K(x)H(1-x)Ni(OH2)4[Ru2(CO3)4].zH2O is a ferrimagnet (Tc = 4.3 K) formed from the reaction of K3[Ru(II/III)2(CO3)4] and Ni(II) in water. It possesses a new 3-D network structural motif composed of linked chains and mu3-CO3 linkages to both Ru and Ni sites. Each Ni(II) bonds to four oxygens and to two [Ru2(CO3)4]3- moieties in a cis manner, and four mu3-CO3 groups from each [Ru2(CO3)4](3-) have two oxygens bonding to the Ru2 moiety, forming the typical paddle-wheel core, and trans pairs of the third CO32- oxygen axially bonded to either another Ru2 or Ni(II).     

Reactivity of the organometallic fac-[(CO)3ReI(H2O)3]+ aquaion. Kinetic and thermodynamic properties of H2O substitution

The water exchange process on [(CO)(3)Re(H(2)O)(3)](+) (1) was kinetically investigated by (17)O NMR. The acidity dependence of the observed rate constant k(obs) was analyzed with a two pathways model in which k(ex) (k(ex)(298) = (6.3 +/- 0.1) x 10(-3) s(-1)) and k(OH) (k(OH)(298)= 27 +/- 1 s(-1)) denote the water exchange rate constants on 1 and on the monohydroxo species [(CO)(3)Re(I)(H(2)O)(2)(OH)], respectively. The kinetic contribution of the basic form was proved to be significant only at [H(+)] < 3 x 10(-3) M. Above this limiting [H(+)] concentration, kinetic investigations can be unambiguously conducted on the triaqua cation (1). The variable temperature study has led to the determination of the activation parameters Delta H(++)(ex) = 90 +/- 3 kJ mol(-1), Delta S(++)(ex) = +14 +/- 10 J K(-1) mol(-1), the latter being indicative of a dissociative activation mode for the water exchange process. To support this assumption, water substitution reaction on 1 has been followed by (17)O/(1)H/(13)C/(19)F NMR with ligands of various nucleophilicities (TFA, Br(-), CH(3)CN, Hbipy(+), Hphen(+), DMS, TU). With unidentate ligands, except Br(-), the mono-, bi-, and tricomplexes were formed by water substitution. With bidentate ligands, bipy and phen, the chelate complexes [(CO)(3)Re(H(2)O)(bipy)]CF(3)SO(3) (2) and [(CO)(3)Re(H(2)O)(phen)](NO(3))(0.5)(CF(3)SO(3))(0.5).H(2)O (3) were isolated and X-ray characterized. For each ligand, the calculated interchange rate constants k'(i) (2.9 x 10(-3) (TFA) < k'(I) < 41.5 x 10(-3) (TU) s(-1)) were found in the same order as the water exchange rate constant k(ex), the S-donor ligands being slightly more reactive. This result is indicative of I(d) mechanism for water exchange and complex formation, since larger variations of k'(i) are expected for an associatively activated mechanism.     

Water-exchange study revealed unexpected substitution behavior of [(CO)2(NO)Re(H2O)3]2+ in aqueous media

The pH-dependent water-exchange rates of [(CO)2(NO)Re(H2O(cis))2(H2O(trans))]2+ (1) in aqueous media were investigated by means of 17O NMR spectroscopy at 298 K. Because of the low pK(a) value found for 1 (pK(a) = 1.4 +/- 0.3), the water-exchange rate constant k(obs)(H2O(trans/cis)) was analyzed with a two-pathway model in which k(Re)(H2O(trans/cis)) and k(ReOH)(H2O)(trans/cis)) denote the water-exchange rate constants in trans or cis position to the nitrosyl ligand on 1 and on the monohydroxo species [(CO)2(NO)Re(H2O)2(OH)]+ (2), respectively. Whereas the rate constants k(ReOH)(H2O)(trans)) and k(ReOH)(H2O)(cis)) were determined as (4.2 +/- 2) x 10(-3) s(-1) and (5.8 +/- 2) x 10(-4) s(-1), respectively, k(Re)(H2O)(trans)) and k(Re)(H2O)(cis)) were too small to be determined in the presence of the much more reactive species 2. Apart from the water exchange, an unexpectedly fast C identical with 16O --> C identical withO exchange was also observed via NMR and IR spectroscopy. It was found to proceed through 1 and 2, with rate constants k(Re)(CO) and k(ReOH)(CO) of (19 +/- 4) x 10(-3) s(-1) and (4 +/- 3) x 10(-3) s(-1), respectively. On the other hand, N identical with 16O --> N identical with *O exchange was not observed.     

Rigorous interpretation of electronic density functions of axial and equatorial conformers of dimethylphosphinoylcyclohexane, 2-(dimethylphosphinoyl)-1,3,5-trithiane, and 2-(dimethylphosphinoyl)-1,3-dithiane-1,1,3,3-tetraoxide

Theoretical analysis within the frame of the Topological Theory of Atoms in Molecules confirms the repulsive steric interaction between an axial dimethylphosphinoyl group and the syn-diaxial hydrogens in cyclohexane derivative 2-ax. In seemingly good agreement with experiment, equatorial isomer 2-eq was calculated to be 1.49 kcal/mol more stable than 2-ax. (Experimental energy difference in (diphenylphosphinoyl)cyclohexane, Delta H(o) = 1.96 kcal/mol.) In contrast, axial 2-(dimethylphosphinoyl)-1,3,5-trithiane, 3-ax, was calculated to be 6.38 kcal/mol more stable than 3-eq. (Experimentally, the axial conformer of 2-(diphenylphosphinoyl)-1,3,5-trithiane, was found to be 1.43 kcal/mol more stable than the equatorial conformer, in solvent chloroform.) Theoretical analysis, in particular the electron density at the bond critical point within the C(4,6)-H...O=P bonding trajectory, implies significant bonding in this segment of interacting atoms. By the same token, substantial positive charge is acquired by the C--H bonds adjacent to the sulfonyl groups in disulfone 4. Hydrogen bonding between the phosphoryl group and H(4,6) leads to stabilization of 4-ax, which is estimated to be 5.0 kcal/mol lower in energy than 4-eq. This conclusion is supported by examination of P==O...H--C(4,6) bond trajectories, as well as from evaluation of the critical point properties along those interacting moieties. By contrast, fluorinated derivative 5 is more stable in the equatorial conformation, indicating a repulsive electrostatic interaction of the C--F...O-P entity in 5-ax.     

Formation and characterization of water-soluble hydrido-ruthenium(II) complexes of 1,3,5-triaza-7-phosphaadamantane and their catalytic activity in hydrogenation of CO2 and HCO3- in aqueous solution

The water-soluble tertiary phosphine complex of ruthenium(II), [RuCl2(PTA)4], (PTA = 1,3,5-triaza-7-phosphaadamantane) was used as catalyst precursor for hydrogenation of CO2 and bicarbonate in aqueous solution, in the absence of amine or other additives, under mild conditions. Reaction of [RuCl2(PTA)4] and H2 (60 bar) gives the hydrides [RuH2(PTA)4] (at pH = 12.0) and [RuH(PTA)4X] (X = Cl- or H2O) (at pH = 2.0). In presence of excess PTA, formation of the unparalleled cationic pentakis-phosphino species, [HRu(PTA)5]+, was unambiguously established by 1H and 31P NMR measurements. The same hydrides were observed when [Ru(H2O)6][tos]2 (tos = toluene-4-sulfonate) reacted with PTA under H2 pressure. The rate of CO2 hydrogenation strongly depends on the pH. The highest initial reaction rate (TOF = 807.3 h(-1)) was determined for a 10% HCO3-/90% CO2 mixture (pH = 5.86), whereas the reduction was very slow both at low and high pH (CO2 and Na2CO3 solutions, respectively). 1H and 31P NMR studies together with the kinetic measurements suggested that HCO3- was the real substrate and [RuH(PTA)4X] the catalytically active hydride species in this reaction. Hydrogenation of HCO3- showed an induction period which could be ascribed to the slow formation of the catalytically active hydride species.     

Room temperature and shock tube study of the reaction HCO+O2 using the photolysis of glyoxal as an efficient HCO source

The rate of the reaction 1, HCO+O2-->HO2+CO, has been determined (i) at room temperature using a slow flow reactor setup (20 mbarH2+HCO+CO, into additional HCO radicals. The rate constants of reaction 4 were determined from unperturbed photolysis experiments to be k4(295 K)=(3.6+/-0.3)x10(10) cm3 mol-1 s-1 and k4(769-1107 K)=5.4x10(13)exp(-18 kJ mol-1/RT) cm3 mol-1 s-1(Delta log k4=+/-0.12).     

Ozonolysis of vinyl compounds,CH2=CH-X,in aqueous solution--the chemistries of the ensuing formyl compounds and hydroperoxides

Reactions of ozone with some vinyl compounds of the general structure CH2=CH-X were studied in aqueous solution. Rate constants (in brackets, unit: dm3 mol-1 s-1) were determined: acrylonitrile (670), vinyl acetate (1.6 x 10(5)), vinylsulfonic acid (anion, 8.3 x 10(3)), vinyl phenylsulfonate (ca. 200), vinyl diethylphosphonate (3.3 x 10(3)), vinylphosphonic acid (acid, 1 x 10(4); mono-anion, 2.7 x 10(4); di-anion, 1 x 10(5)), vinyl bromide (1 x 10(4)). The main pathway leads to the formation of HOOCH2OH and HC(O)X. As measured by stopped flow with conductometric detection, the latter one may undergo rapid hydrolysis by water, e.g. HC(O)CN (3 s-1). Other HC(O)X hydrolyse much slower, e.g. HC(O)PO3(Et)2 (7 x 10(-3) s-1) and HC(O)P(OH)O2- (too slow to be measured). The OH(-)-induced hydrolyses range from ca. 5 dm3 mol-1 s-1 [HC(O)PO(3)2-] to 3.8 x 10(5) dm3 mol-1 s-1 [HC(O)CN]. HC(O)Br mainly decomposes rapidly (too fast for the determination of the rate) into CO and Br- plus H+, and the competing hydrolysis is of minor importance (3.7%). The slow hydrolysis of HC(O)PO(3)2- at pH 10.2, where HOOCH2OH is rapidly decomposed into CH2O plus H2O2, allows an H2O2-induced decomposition (k = 260 dm3 mol-1 s-1) to take place. Formate and phosphate are the final products.     

Kinetics of the O + HCNO reaction

The kinetics of the O + HCNO reaction were investigated by a relative rate technique using infrared diode laser absorption spectroscopy. Laser photolysis (355 nm) of NO2 was used to produce O atoms, followed by O atom reactions with CS2, NO2, and HCNO, and infrared detection of OCS product from the O + CS2 reaction. Analysis of the experiment data yields a rate constant of k1= (9.84 +/- 3.52) x 10-12 exp[(-195 +/- 120)/T)] (cm3 molecule-1 s-1) over the temperature range 298-375 K, with a value of k1 = (5.32 +/- 0.40) x 10-12 cm3 molecule-1 s-1 at 298 K. Infrared detection of product species indicates that CO producing channels, probably CO + NO + H, dominate the reaction.     

Reactions of [Ru(H(2)O)(6)](2+) with water-soluble tertiary phosphines

In aqueous solutions under mild conditions, [Ru(H(2)O)(6)](2+) was reacted with various water-soluble tertiary phosphines. As determined by multinuclear NMR spectroscopy, reactions with the sulfonated arylphosphines L =mtppms, ptppms and mtppts yielded only the mono- and bisphosphine complexes, [Ru(H(2)O)(5)L](2+), cis-[Ru(H(2)O)(4)L(2)](2+), and trans-[Ru(H(2)O)(4)L(2)](2+) even in a high ligand excess. With the small aliphatic phosphine L = 1,3,5-triaza-7-phosphatricyclo-[3.3.1.1(3,7)]decane (pta) at [L]:[Ru]= 12:1, the tris- and tetrakisphosphino species, [Ru(H(2)O)(3)(pta)(3)](2+), [Ru(H(2)O)(2)(pta)(4)](2+), [Ru(H(2)O)(OH)(pta)(4)](+), and [Ru(OH)(2)(pta)(4)] were also detected, albeit in minor quantities. These results have significance for the in situ preparation of Ru(II)-tertiary phosphine catalysts. The structures of the complexes trans-[Ru(H(2)O)(4)(ptaMe)(2)](tos)(4)x2H(2)O, trans-[Ru(H(2)O)(4)(ptaH)(2)](tos)(4)[middle dot]2H(2)O, and trans-mer-[RuI(2)(H(2)O)(ptaMe)(3)]I(3)x2H(2)O, containing protonated or methylated pta ligands (ptaH and ptaMe, respectively) were determined by single crystal X-ray diffraction.     

Synthesis of mononuclear and dinuclear ruthenium(II) tris(heteroleptic) complexes via photosubstitution in bis(carbonyl) precursors

A novel, and quite general, approach for the preparation of tris(heteroleptic) ruthenium(II) complexes is reported. Using this method, which is based on photosubstitution of carbonyl ligands in precursors such as [Ru(bpy)(CO)(2)Cl(2)] and [Ru(bpy)(Me(2)bpy)(CO)(2)](PF(6))(2), mononuclear and dinuclear Ru(II) tris(heteroleptic) polypyridyl complexes containing the bridging ligands 3,5-bis(pyridin-2-yl)-1,2,4-triazole (Hbpt) and 3,5-bis(pyrazin-2-yl)-1,2,4-triazole (Hbpzt) have been prepared. The complexes obtained were purified by column chromatography and characterized by HPLC, mass spectrometry, 1H NMR, absorption and emission spectroscopy and by electrochemical methods. The X-ray structures of the compounds [Ru(bpy)(Me(2)bpy)(bpt)](PF(6))x0.5C(4)H(10)O [1x0.5C(4)H(10)O], [Ru(bpy)(Me(2)bpy)(bpzt)](PF(6))xH(2)O (2xH(2)O) and [Ru(bpy)(Me(2)bpy)(CH(3)CN)(2)](PF(6))(2)xC(4)H(10)O (6xC(4)H(10)O) are reported. The synthesis and characterisation of the dinuclear analogues of 1 and 2, [{Ru(bpy)(Me(2)bpy)}(2)bpt](PF(6))(3)x2H(2)O (3) and [{Ru(bpy)(Me(2)bpy)}(2)bpzt](PF(6))(3) (4), are also described.     

Hydride ion transfer from ruthenium(II) complexes in water: kinetics and mechanism

Reactions of hydride complexes of ruthenium(II) with hydride acceptors have been examined for Ru(terpy)(bpy)H(+), Ru(terpy)(dmb)H(+), and Ru(η(6)-C(6)Me(6))(bpy)(H)(+) in aqueous media at 25 °C (terpy = 2,2';6',2'-terpyridine, bpy = 2,2'-bipyridine, dmb = 4,4'-dimethyl-2,2'-bipyridine). The acceptors include CO(2), CO, CH(2)O, and H(3)O(+). CO reacts with Ru(terpy)(dmb)H(+) with a rate constant of 1.2 (0.2) × 10(1) M(-1) s(-1), but for Ru(η(6)-C(6)Me(6))(bpy)(H)(+), the reaction was very slow, k ≤ 0.1 M(-1) s(-1). Ru(terpy)(bpy)H(+) and Ru(η(6)-C(6)Me(6))(bpy)(H)(+) react with CH(2)O with rate constants of (6 ± 4) × 10(6) and 1.1 × 10(3) M(-1) s(-1), respectively. The reaction of Ru(η(6)-C(6)Me(6))(bpy)(H)(+) with acid exhibits straightforward, second-order kinetics, with the rate proportional to [Ru(η(6)-C(6)Me(6))(bpy)(H)(+)] and [H(3)O(+)] and k = 2.2 × 10(1) M(-1) s(-1) (μ = 0.1 M, Na(2)SO(4) medium). However, for the case of Ru(terpy)(bpy)H(+), the protonation step is very rapid, and only the formation of the product Ru(terpy)(bpy)(H(2)O)(2+) (presumably via a dihydrogen or dihydride complex) is observed with a k(obs) of ca. 4 s(-1). The hydricities of HCO(2)(-), HCO(-), and H(3)CO(-) in water are estimated as +1.48, -0.76, and +1.57 eV/molecule (+34, -17.5, +36 kcal/mol), respectively. Theoretical studies of the reactions with CO(2) reveal a "product-like" transition state with short C-H and long M-H distances. (Reactant) Ru-H stretched 0.68 ?; (product) C-H stretched only 0.04 ?. The role of water solvent was explored by including one, two, or three water molecules in the calculation.     

Accurate measurement of the relative bond energies of CO and H2O ligands in Fe+ mono- and bis-ligated complexes

The systems Fe(H(2)O)(n) (+)/CO[bond]H(2)O and Fe(CO)(n) (+)/CO[bond]H(2)O (n = 1 and 2) were investigated in a triple cell Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance (FT-ICR) mass spectrometer. Using mixtures of CO with a very small amount of water, the ligand exchange equilibrium was reached, allowing experimental determination of the relevant equilibrium constants and free energies of reaction. Quantum chemical calculations at the B3LYP level of theory on the reactant and product species allowed us to determine the entropic terms and to derive the relative bond energies of CO and H(2)O in the mono- and bis-ligated complexes. For n = 1, H(2)O is more strongly bound to Fe(+) than CO by 4.1 +/- 1.6 kJ x mol(-1) at 298 K. For n = 2, at the same temperature, H(2)O is more strongly bound than CO to (H(2)O)Fe(+) by 7.6 +/- 1.6 kJ x mol(-1), and to (CO)Fe(+) by more than 20.1 kJ x mol(-1).     

The impact of tripodal chelates on water exchange kinetics and mechanisms: a variable temperature and pressure 17O NMR study to clarify the structure-reactivity relationship in [Fe(II)(L)(H2O2](-) complexes

The effect of temperature and pressure on the water exchange reaction of [Fe(II)(NTA)(H2O)2](-) and [Fe(II)(BADA)(H2O)2](-) (NTA = nitrilotriacetate; BADA = beta-alanindiacetate) was studied by 17O NMR spectroscopy. The [Fe(II)(NTA)(H2O)2](-) complex showed a water exchange rate constant, k(ex), of (3.1 +/- 0.4) x 10(6) s(-1) at 298.2 K and ambient pressure. The activation parameters DeltaH( not equal), DeltaS( not equal) and DeltaV( not equal) for the observed reaction are 43.4 +/- 2.6 kJ mol(-1), + 25 +/- 9 J K(-1) mol(-1) and + 13.2 +/- 0.6 cm(3) mol(-1), respectively. For [Fe(II)(BADA)(H2O)2](-), the water exchange reaction is faster than for the [Fe(II)(NTA)(H2O)2](-) complex with k(ex) = (7.4 +/- 0.4) x 10(6) s(-1) at 298.2 K and ambient pressure. The activation parameters DeltaH( not equal), DeltaS( not equal) and DeltaV( not equal) for the water exchange reaction are 40.3 +/- 2.5 kJ mol(-1), + 22 +/- 9 J K(-1) mol(-1) and + 13.3 +/- 0.8 cm(3) mol(-1), respectively. The effect of pressure on the exchange rate constant is large and very similar for both systems, and the numerical values for DeltaV( not equal) suggest in both cases a limiting dissociative (D) mechanism for the water exchange process.     

Speciation and kinetics related to catalytic carbonylation in the presence of cis-[Ir(CO)2I2]P(C6H5)4 under CO and H2 pressures

The differences in the reactivities of the square-planar complexes cis-[Rh(CO)2I2]- (1) and cis-[Ir(CO)2I2]- (2), involved in the catalytic carbonylation of olefins, are investigated, with P(C6H5)4+ as the counterion, by ambient- and high-pressure NMR and IR spectroscopy. Under an elevated pressure of CO, 1 and 2 form the [M(CO)3I] complexes with the equilibrium constants KIr approximately 1.8 x 10(-3) and KRh approximately 4 x 10(-5). The ratio KIr/KRh close to 50 shows that, under catalytic conditions (a few megapascals), only complex 1 remains in the anionic form, while a major amount of the iridium analogue 2 is converted to a neutral species. The oxidative addition reactions of HI with 1 and 2 give two monohydrides of different geometries, mer,trans-[HRh(CO)2I3]- (3) and fac,cis-[HIr(CO)2I3]- (4), respectively. Both hydrides are unstable at ambient temperature and form, within minutes for Rh and within hours for Ir, the corresponding cis-[M(CO)2I2]- (1 or 2) and [M(CO)2I4]- (5 or 6) species and H2. When an H2 pressure of 5.5 MPa is applied to a nitromethane solution of complex 2, ca. 50% of 2 is transformed to cis-dihydride complexes. The formation of cis,cis,cis-[IrH2(CO)2I2]- (8a) is followed by intermolecular rearrangements to form cis,trans,cis-[IrH2(CO)2I2]- (8b) and cis,cis,trans-[IrH2(CO)2I2]- (8c). A small amount of a dinuclear species, [Ir2H(CO)4I4]x- (9), is also observed. The formation rate constants for 8a and 8b at 262 K are k1(262) = (4.42 +/- 0.18) x 10(-4) M-1 s-1, k-1(262) = (1.49 +/- 0.07) x 10(-4) s-1, k2(262) = (2.81 +/- 0.04) x 10(-5) s-1, and k-2(262) = (5.47 +/- 0.16) x 10(-6) s-1. The two equilibrium constants K1(262) = [8a]/([2][H2]) = 2.97 +/- 0.03 M-1 and K2(262) = [8b]/[8a] = 5.13 +/- 0.10 show that complex 8b is the thermodynamically stable addition product. However, no similar H2 addition products of the rhodium analogue 1 are observed. The pressurization with H2 of a solution containing 2 and 6 give the monohydride 4, the dihydrides 8a and 8b, the dinuclear complex 9, and the two new complexes [Ir(CO)2I3] (10) and [HIr(CO)2I2] (11). The reactions of the iridium complexes with H2 and HI are summarized in a single scheme.     

Kinetics and mechanisms of CF3CHFOCH3, CF3CHFOC(O)H, and FC(O)OCH3 reactions with OH radicals

The kinetics and mechanism of oxidation of CF3CHFOCH3 was studied using an 11.5-dm3 environmental reaction chamber. OH radicals were produced by UV photolysis of an O3-H2O-He mixture at an initial pressure of 200 Torr in the chamber. The rate constant of the reaction of CF3CHFOCH3 with OH radicals (k1) was determined to be (1.77 +/- 0.69) x 10(-12) exp[(-720 +/- 110)/T] cm3 molecule(-1)(s-1) by means of a relative rate method at 253-328 K. The mechanism of the reaction was investigated by FT-IR spectroscopy at 298 K. CF3CHFOC(O)H, FC(O)OCH3, and COF2 were determined to be the major products. The branching ratio (k1a/k1b) for the reactions CF3CHFOCH3 + OH --> CF3CHFOCH2* + H2O (k1a) and CF3CHFOCH3 + OH --> CF3CF*OCH3 + H2O (k1b) was estimated to be 4.2:1 at 298 K from the yields of CF3CHFOC(O)H, FC(O)OCH3, and COF2. The rate constants of the reactions of CF3CHFOC(O)H (k2) and FC(O)OCH3 (k3) with OH radicals were determined to be (9.14 +/- 2.78) x 10(-13) exp[(-1190 +/- 90)/T] and (2.10 +/- 0.65) x 10(-13) exp[(-630 +/- 90)/T] cm3 molecule(-1)(s-1), respectively, by means of a relative rate method at 253-328 K. The rate constants at 298 K were as follows: k1 = (1.56 +/- 0.06) x 10-13, k2 = (1.67 +/- 0.05) x 10-14, and k3 = (2.53 +/- 0.07) x 10-14 cm3 molecule(-1)(s-1). The tropospheric lifetimes of CF3CHFOCH3, CF3CHFOC(O)H, and FC(O)OCH3 with respect to reaction with OH radicals were estimated to be 0.29, 3.2, and 1.8 years, respectively.     

Synthesis and recognition properties of a ruthenium(II)-bis(zinc) cyclic porphyrin trimer

A series of cyclic metalloporphyrin trimers containing one Ru(II)-CO porphyrin center are synthesized. A stepwise convergent route is used to synthesize Ru(CO)Zn(2)2.Py3T, where tripyridyltriazine (Py3T) templates the formation of the trimer and forces the CO group to the outside of the cavity. Three mixed-metal trimers, Ru(CO)Zn(2)2, Ru(CO)Ni(2)2, and Ru(CO)Mg(2)2, are synthesized from Ru(CO)Zn(2)2.Py3T and are characterized by NMR, UV-visible, and fluorescence spectroscopy. The Ru(CO)Zn(2)2 trimer is found to bind Py3T very tightly (K approximately 10(12) M-1), the resultant complex dissociating very slowly (kdissoc approximately 3 x 10(-7) s-1) in CDCl3 at 60 degrees C. During the course of these studies, the binding selectivity of a ruthenium porphyrin monomer, Ru(CO)3, for pyridine over THF is estimated to be ca. 7 x 10(4):1.     

Triggering water exchange mechanisms via chelate architecture. Shielding of transition metal centers by aminopolycarboxylate spectator ligands

Paramagnetic effects on the relaxation rate and shift difference of the (17)O nucleus of bulk water enable the study of water exchange mechanisms on transition metal complexes by variable temperature and variable pressure NMR. The water exchange kinetics of [Mn(II)(edta)(H2O)](2-) (CN 7, hexacoordinated edta) was reinvestigated and complemented by variable pressure NMR data. The results revealed a rapid water exchange reaction for the [Mn(II)(edta)(H2O)](2-) complex with a rate constant of k(ex) = (4.1 +/- 0.4) x 10(8) s(-1) at 298.2 K and ambient pressure. The activation parameters DeltaH(double dagger), DeltaS(double dagger), and DeltaV(double dagger) are 36.6 +/- 0.8 kJ mol(-1), +43 +/- 3 J K(-1) mol(-1), and +3.4 +/- 0.2 cm(3) mol(-1), which are in line with a dissociatively activated interchange (I(d)) mechanism. To analyze the structural influence of the chelate, the investigation was complemented by studies on complexes of the edta-related tmdta (trimethylenediaminetetraacetate) chelate. The kinetic parameters for [Fe(II)(tmdta)(H2O)](2-) are k(ex) = (5.5 +/- 0.5) x 10(6) s(-1) at 298.2 K, DeltaH(double dagger) = 43 +/- 3 kJ mol(-1), DeltaS(double dagger) = +30 +/- 13 J K(-1) mol(-1), and DeltaV(double dagger) = +15.7 +/- 1.5 cm(3) mol(-1), and those for [Mn(II)(tmdta)(H2O)](2-) are k(ex) = (1.3 +/- 0.1) x 10(8) s(-1) at 298.2 K, DeltaH(double dagger) = 37.2 +/- 0.8 kJ mol(-1), DeltaS(double dagger) = +35 +/- 3 J K(-1) mol(-1), and DeltaV(double dagger) = +8.7 +/- 0.6 cm(3) mol(-1). The water containing species, [Fe(III)(tmdta)(H2O)](-) with a fraction of 0.2, is in equilibrium with the water-free hexa-coordinate form, [Fe(III)(tmdta)](-). The kinetic parameters for [Fe(III)(tmdta)(H2O)](-) are k(ex) = (1.9 +/- 0.8) x 10(7) s(-1) at 298.2 K, DeltaH(double dagger) = 42 +/- 3 kJ mol(-1), DeltaS(double dagger) = +36 +/- 10 J K(-1) mol(-1), and DeltaV(double dagger) = +7.2 +/- 2.7 cm(3) mol(-1). The data for the mentioned tmdta complexes indicate a dissociatively activated exchange mechanism in all cases with a clear relationship between the sterical hindrance that arises from the ligand architecture and mechanistic details of the exchange process for seven-coordinate complexes. The unexpected kinetic and mechanistic behavior of [Ni(II)(edta')(H2O)](2-) and [Ni(II)(tmdta')(H2O)](2-) is accounted for in terms of the different coordination number due to the strong preference for an octahedral coordination environment and thus a coordination equilibrium between the water-free, hexadentate [M(L)](n+) and the aqua-pentadentate forms [M(L')(H2O)](n+) of the Ni(II)-edta complex, which was studied in detail by variable temperature and pressure UV-vis experiments. For [Ni(II)(edta')(H2O)](2-) (CN 6, pentacoordinated edta) a water substitution rate constant of (2.6 +/- 0.2) x 10(5) s(-1) at 298.2 K and ambient pressure was measured, and the activation parameters DeltaH(double dagger), DeltaS(double dagger), and DeltaV(double dagger) were found to be 34 +/- 1 kJ mol(-1), -27 +/- 2 J K(-1) mol(-1), and +1.8 +/- 0.1 cm(3) mol(-1), respectively. For [Ni(II)(tmdta')(H2O)](2-), we found k = (6.4 +/- 1.4) x 10(5) s(-1) at 298.2 K, DeltaH(double dagger) = 22 +/- 4 kJ mol(-1), and DeltaS(double dagger) = -59 +/- 5 J K(-1) mol(-1). The process is referred to as a water substitution instead of a water exchange reaction, since these observations refer to the intramolecular displacement of coordinated water by the carboxylate moiety in a ring-closure reaction.     

Formation and reactivity of Ir(III) hydroxycarbonyl complexes

Kinetic studies show that the reaction of [TpIr(CO)2] (1, Tp = hydrotris(pyrazolyl)borate) with water to give [TpIr(CO2H)(CO)H] (2) is second order (k = 1.65 x 10(-4) dm(3) mol(-1) s(-1), 25 degrees C, MeCN) with activation parameters DeltaH++= 46+/-2 kJ mol(-1) and DeltaS++ = -162+/-5 J K(-1) mol(-1). A kinetic isotope effect of k(H2O)/k(D2O) = 1.40 at 20 degrees C indicates that O-H/D bond cleavage is involved in the rate-determining step. Despite being more electron rich than 1, [Tp*Ir(CO)2] (1*, Tp* = hydrotris(3,5-dimethylpyrazolyl)borate) reacts rapidly with adventitious water to give [Tp*Ir(CO2H)(CO)H] (2*). A proposed mechanism consistent with the relative reactivity of 1 and 1* involves initial protonation of Ir(I) followed by nucleophilic attack on a carbonyl ligand. An X-ray crystal structure of 2* shows dimer formation via pairwise H-bonding interactions of hydroxycarbonyl ligands (r(O...O) 2.65 A). Complex 2* is thermally stable but (like 2) is amphoteric, undergoing dehydroxylation with acid to give [Tp*Ir(CO)2H]+ (3*) and decarboxylation with OH- to give [TpIr(CO)H2] (4*). Complex 2 undergoes thermal decarboxylation above ca. 50 degrees C to give [TpIr(CO)H2] (4) in a first-order process with activation parameters DeltaH++ = 115+/-4 kJ mol(-1) and DeltaS++ = 60+/-10 J K(-1) mol(-1).     

Relevance of the ligand exchange rate and mechanism of fac-[(CO)3M(H2O)3]+ (M = Mn, Tc, Re) complexes for new radiopharmaceuticals

The water exchange process on fac-[(CO)3Mn(H2O)3]+ and fac-[(CO)3Tc(H2O)3]+ was kinetically investigated by 17O NMR as a function of the acidity, temperature, and pressure. Up to pH 6.3 and 4.4, respectively, the exchange rate is not affected by the acidity, thus demonstrating that the contribution of the monohydroxo species fac-[(CO)3M(OH)(H2O)2] is not significant, which correlates well with a higher pKa for these complexes compared to the homologue fac-[(CO)3Re(H2O)3]+ complex. The water exchange rate K298ex/s(-1) (DeltaHex double dagger/kJ mol(-1); DeltaSex double dagger/J mol(-1) K(-1); DeltaV double dagger/cm3 mol-1) decreases down group 7 from Mn to Tc and Re: 23 (72.5; +24.4; +7.1) > 0.49 (78.3; +11.7; +3.8) > 5.4 x 10(-3) (90.3; +14.5; -). For the Mn complex only, an O exchange on the carbonyl ligand could be measured (K338co = 4.3 x 10(-6) s(-1)), which is several orders of magnitude slower than the water exchange. In the case of the Tc complex, the coupling between 17O (I = 5/2) and 99Tc (I = 9/2) nuclear spins has been observed (1J99Tc,17O = 80 +/- 5 Hz). The substitution of water in fac-[(CO)3M(H2O)3]+ by dimethyl sulfide (DMS) is slightly faster than that by CH3CN: 3 times faster for Mn, 1.5 times faster for Tc, and 1.2 times faster for Re. The pressure dependence behavior is different for Mn and Re. For Mn, the change in volume to reach the transition state is always clearly positive (water exchange, CH3CN, DMS), indicating an Id mechanism. In the case of Re, an Id/Ia changeover is assigned on the basis of reaction profiles with a strong volume maximum for pyrazine and a minimum for DMS as the entering ligand.     

Kinetics and mechanisms of the oxidation of iodide and bromide in aqueous solutions by a trans-dioxoruthenium(VI) complex

The kinetics and mechanisms of the oxidation of I (-) and Br (-) by trans-[Ru (VI)(N 2O 2)(O) 2] (2+) have been investigated in aqueous solutions. The reactions have the following stoichiometry: trans-[Ru (VI)(N 2O 2)(O) 2] (2+) + 3X (-) + 2H (+) --> trans-[Ru (IV)(N 2O 2)(O)(OH 2)] (2+) + X 3 (-) (X = Br, I). In the oxidation of I (-) the I 3 (-)is produced in two distinct phases. The first phase produces 45% of I 3 (-) with the rate law d[I 3 (-)]/dt = ( k a + k b[H (+)])[Ru (VI)][I (-)]. The remaining I 3 (-) is produced in the second phase which is much slower, and it follows first-order kinetics but the rate constant is independent of [I (-)], [H (+)], and ionic strength. In the proposed mechanism the first phase involves formation of a charge-transfer complex between Ru (VI) and I (-), which then undergoes a parallel acid-catalyzed oxygen atom transfer to produce [Ru (IV)(N 2O 2)(O)(OHI)] (2+), and a one electron transfer to give [Ru (V)(N 2O 2)(O)(OH)] (2+) and I (*). [Ru (V)(N 2O 2)(O)(OH)] (2+) is a stronger oxidant than [Ru (VI)(N 2O 2)(O) 2] (2+) and will rapidly oxidize another I (-) to I (*). In the second phase the [Ru (IV)(N 2O 2)(O)(OHI)] (2+) undergoes rate-limiting aquation to produce HOI which reacts rapidly with I (-) to produce I 2. In the oxidation of Br (-) the rate law is -d[Ru (VI)]/d t = {( k a2 + k b2[H (+)]) + ( k a3 + k b3[H (+)]) [Br (-)]}[Ru (VI)][Br (-)]. At 298.0 K and I = 0.1 M, k a2 = (2.03 +/- 0.03) x 10 (-2) M (-1) s (-1), k b2 = (1.50 +/- 0.07) x 10 (-1) M (-2) s (-1), k a3 = (7.22 +/- 2.19) x 10 (-1) M (-2) s (-1) and k b3 = (4.85 +/- 0.04) x 10 (2) M (-3) s (-1). The proposed mechanism involves initial oxygen atom transfer from trans-[Ru (VI)(N 2O 2)(O) 2] (2+) to Br (-) to give trans-[Ru (IV)(N 2O 2)(O)(OBr)] (+), which then undergoes parallel aquation and oxidation of Br (-), and both reactions are acid-catalyzed.