Stable [C2H7O2]+ isomers: Experimental and theoretical evidence for the existence of protonated peroxides and proton-bound dimers in the gas phase

Evidence is presented for the gas phase generation of at least eight stable isomeric [C₂H₇O₂]⁺ ions. These include energy-rich protonated peroxides (ions \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ {\rm CH}_{\rm 3} {\rm CH}_2 {\rm O}\mathop {\rm O}\limits^{\rm + } {\rm H}_{\rm 2} $\end{document} (e), \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ {\rm CH}_{\rm 3} {\rm CH}_{\rm 2} \mathop {\rm O}\limits^{\rm + } {\rm (H)OH} $\end{document} (f) and \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ {\rm CH}_{\rm 3} {\rm O}\mathop {\rm O}\limits^{\rm + } {\rm (H)CH}_{\rm 3} {\rm (g)),} $\end{document} (g)), proton-bound dimers (ions \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ {\rm CH}_{\rm 3} {\rm CH = O} \cdot \cdot \cdot \mathop {\rm H}\limits^{\rm 3} \cdot \cdot \cdot {\rm OH}_{\rm 2} $\end{document} (h) and \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ {\rm CH2 = O} \cdot \cdot \cdot \mathop {\rm H}\limits^{\rm + } \cdot \cdot \cdot {\rm HOCH}_{\rm 3} $\end{document} (i)) and hydroxy-protonated species (ions \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ {\rm CH}_{\rm 2} {\rm (OH)CH}_{\rm 2} \mathop {\rm O}\limits^{\rm + } {\rm H}_{\rm 2} (a), $\end{document} \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ {\rm CH}_{\rm 3} {\rm CH(OH)}\mathop {\rm O}\limits^{\rm + } {\rm H}_{\rm 2} $\end{document} (b) and \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ {\rm CH}_{\rm 3} {\rm OCH}_{\rm 2} \mathop {\rm O}\limits^{\rm + } {\rm H}_{\rm 2} $\end{document} (c)). The important points of the present study are (i) that these ions are prevented by high barriers from facile interconversion and (ii) that both electron-impact- and proton-induced gas phase decompositions seem to proceed via multistep reactions, some of which eventually result in the formation of proton-bound dimers.     

Gas phase ion chemistry of methyl acetate,methyl propanoate and their enolic tautomers. An experimental approach

From a combination of isotopic substitution, time-resolved measurements and sequential collision experiments, it was proposed that whereas ionized methyl acetate prior to fragmentation rearranges largely into \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ {\rm CH}_3 \mathop {\rm C}\limits^ + ({\rm OH}){\rm O}\mathop {\rm C}\limits^{\rm .} {\rm H}_2 $\end{document}, in contrast, methyl propanoate molecular ions isomerize into \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ \mathop {\rm C}\limits^. {\rm H}_2 {\rm CH}_2 \mathop {\rm C}\limits^ + ({\rm OH}){\rm OCH}_3 $\end{document}. Metastably fragmenting methyl acetate molecular ions are known predominantly to form H₂?OH together with \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ {\rm CH}_3 - \mathop {\rm C}\limits^ + = {\rm O} $\end{document}, whereas ionized methyl propanoate largely yields H₃CO˙ together with \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ {\rm CH}_3 {\rm CH}_2 - \mathop {\rm C}\limits^ + = {\rm O} $\end{document}. The observations were explained in terms of the participation of different distonic molecular ions. The enol form of ionized methyl acetate generates substantially more H₃CO˙ in admixture with H₂?OH than the keto tautomer. This is ascribed to the rearrangement of the enol ion to the keto form being partially rate determining, which results in a wider range of internal energies among metastably fragmenting enol ions. Extensive ab initio calculations at a high level of theory would be required to establish detailed reaction mechanisms.     

Pyrolysis of dimethyl peroxide

By using isobutane (t-BuH) as a radical trapit has been possible to study the initial step in the decomposition of dimethyl peroxide (DMP) over the temperature range of 110–140°C in a static system. For low concentrations of DMP (2.5 × 10^?5?10^?4M) and high pressures of t?BuH (～0.9 atm) the first-order homogeneous rate of formation of methanol (MeOH) is a direct measure of reaction (1): \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}${\rm DMP}\mathop \to \limits^1 2{\rm Me}\mathop {\rm O}\limits^{\rm .},{\rm Me}\mathop {\rm O}\limits^{\rm .} + t{\rm - BuH}\mathop \to \limits^4 {\rm MeOH} + t{\rm -}\mathop {\rm B}\limits^{\rm .} {\rm u}$\end{document}. For complete decomposition of DMP in t-BuH, virtually all of the DMP is converted to MeOH. Thus DMP is a clean thermal source of Me\documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$\mathop {\rm O}\limits^{\rm .}$\end{document}. In the decomposition of pure DMP complications arise due to the H-abstraction reactions of Me\documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$\mathop {\rm O}\limits^{\rm .}$\end{document} from DMP and the product CH₂O. The rate constant for reaction (1) is given by k₁ = 10^15.5?37.0/θ sec^?1, very similar to other dialkyl peroxides. The thermochemistry leads to the result D(MeO? OMe) = 37.6 ± 0.2 kcal/mole and /H(Me\documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$\mathop {\rm O}\limits^{\rm .}$\end{document}) = 3.8 ± 0.2 kcal/mole. It is concluded that D(RO? OR) and D(RO? H) are unaffected by the nature of R. From ΔS and A₁, k₂ is calculated to be 10^10.3±0.5 M^?1· sec^?1: \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$2{\rm Me}\mathop {\rm O}\limits^{\rm .} \mathop \to \limits^2 {\rm DMP}$\end{document}. For complete reaction, trace amounts of t-BuOMe lead to the result k₂ ～ 10⁹ M^?1 ·sec^?1: \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$2t{\rm - Bu}\mathop \to \limits^5$\end{document} products. From the relationship k₆ = 2(k₂k_5a)^1/2 and with k_5a = 10^8.4 M^?1 · sec^?1, we arrive at the result k₆ = 10^9.7 M^?1 · sec^?1: \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$2t{\rm - u}\mathop {\rm B}\limits^{\rm .} \to (t{\rm - Bu)}_{\rm 2}{\rm,}t{\rm -}\mathop {\rm B}\limits^{\rm .} {\rm u} + {\rm Me}\mathop {\rm O}\limits^{\rm .} \mathop \to \limits^6 t{\rm - BuOMe}$\end{document}.     

The gas phase ion chemistry of the acetyl cation and isomeric [C2H3O]+ ions. On the structure of the [C2H3O]+ daughter ions generated from the enol of acetone radical cation

Methods are described for the unequivocal identification of the acetyl, [CH₃? \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ \mathop {\rm C}\limits^{\rm + } $\end{document} ?O] (a), 1-hydroxyvinyl, [CH₂?\documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ \mathop {\rm C}\limits^{\rm + } $\end{document}? OH] (b), and oxiranyl, (d), cations. They involve the careful examination of metastable peak intensities and shapes and collision induced processes at very low, high and intermediate collision gas pressures. It will be shown that each [C₂H₃O]⁺ ion produces a unique metastable peak for the fragmentation [C₂H₃O]⁺ → [CH₃]⁺+CO, each appropriately relating to different [C₂H₃O]⁺ structures. [CH₃? \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ \mathop {\rm C}\limits^{\rm + } $\end{document}?O] ions do not interconvert with any of the other [C₂H₃O]⁺ ions prior to loss of CO, but deuterium and ¹³C labelling experiments established that [CH₂?\documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ \mathop {\rm C}\limits^{\rm + } $\end{document}? OH] (b) rearranges via a 1,2-H shift into energy-rich leading to the loss of positional identity of the carbon atoms in ions (b). Fragmentation of b to [CH₃]⁺+CO has a high activation energy, c. 400 kJ mol^?1. On the other hand, , generated at its threshold from a suitable precursor molecule, does not rearrange into [CH₂?\documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ \mathop {\rm C}\limits^{\rm + } $\end{document}? OH], but undergoes a slow isomerization into [CH₃? \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ \mathop {\rm C}\limits^{\rm + } $\end{document}?O] via [CH₂\documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ \mathop {\rm C}\limits^{\rm + } $\end{document}HO]. Interpretation of results rests in part upon recent ab initio calculations. The methods described in this paper permit the identification of reactions that have hitherto lain unsuspected: for example, many of the ionized molecules of type CH₃COR examined in this work produce [CH₂?\documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ \mathop {\rm C}\limits^{\rm + } $\end{document}? OH] ions in addition to [CH₃? \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ \mathop {\rm C}\limits^{\rm + } $\end{document}?O] showing that some enolization takes place prior to fragmentation. Furthermore, ionized ethanol generates a, b and d ions. We have also applied the methods for identification of daughter ions in systems of current interest. The loss of OH^˙ from [CH₃COOD]^+˙ generates only [CH₂?\documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ \mathop {\rm C}\limits^{\rm + } $\end{document}? OD]. Elimination of CH₃^˙ from the enol of acetone radical cation most probably generates only [CH₃? \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ \mathop {\rm C}\limits^{\rm + } $\end{document}?O] ions, confirming the earlier proposal for non-ergodic behaviour of this system. We stress, however, that until all stable isomeric species (such as [CH₃? \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ \mathop {\rm O}\limits^{\rm + } $\end{document}?C:]) have been experimentally identified, the hypothesis of incompletely randomized energy should be used with reserve.     

Structures and relative energies of gas-phase [C2H7N]+˙ radical cations

Ab initio molecular orbital calculations with split-valence plus polarization basis sets and incorporating electron correlation and zero-point energy corrections have been used to examine possible equilibrium structures on the [C₂H₇N]⁺˙ surface. In addition to the radical cations of ethylamine and dimethylamine, three other isomers were found which have comparable energy, but which have no stable neutral counterparts. These are \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ \mathop {\rm C}\limits^{\rm .} {\rm H}_{\rm 2} {\rm CH}_{\rm 2} \mathop {\rm N}\limits^{\rm + } {\rm H}_{\rm 3} $\end{document}, \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ {\rm CH}_{\rm 3} \mathop {\rm C}\limits^{\rm .} {\rm H}\mathop {\rm N}\limits^{\rm + } {\rm H}_{\rm 3} $\end{document}and\documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ {\rm CH}_{\rm 3} \mathop {\rm N}\limits^{\rm + } {\rm H}_{\rm 2} \mathop {\rm C}\limits^. {\rm H}_{\rm 2} {\rm }, $\end{document} with calculated energies relative to the ethylamine radical cation of ?33, ?28 and 4 kJ mol^?1, respectively. Substantial barriers for rearrangement among the various isomers and significant binding energies with respect to possible fragmentation products are found. The predictions for \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ \mathop {\rm C}\limits^. {\rm H}_{\rm 2} {\rm CH}_{\rm 2} \mathop {\rm N}\limits^ + {\rm H}_{\rm 3} $\end{document} and \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ {\rm CH}_{\rm 3} \mathop {\rm C}\limits^{\rm .} {\rm H}\mathop {\rm N}\limits^{\rm + } {\rm H}_{\rm 3}$\end{document} are consistent with their recent observation in the gas phase. The remaining isomer, \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ {\rm CH}_{\rm 3} \mathop {\rm N}\limits^{\rm + } {\rm H}_{\rm 2} \mathop {\rm C}\limits^{\rm .} {\rm H}_{\rm 2} {\rm },$\end{document}is also predicted to be experimentally observable.     

Structure and formation of gaseous [C4H5O]+ ions. I—isomeric ions of the type C3H5\documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document} $\mathop {\rm C}\limits^ + =\!= $\end{document}O

Characterization of [C₄H₅O]⁺ ions in the gas phase using their collisional activation spectra shows that the four C₃H₅\documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document} $\mathop {\rm C}\limits^ + =\!= $\end{document}O isomers CH₂?C(CH₃)\documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document} $\mathop {\rm C}\limits^ + =\!= $\end{document}O, CH₂?CHCH₂\documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document} $\mathop {\rm C}\limits^ + =\!= $\end{document}O, CH₃CH?CH\documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document} $\mathop {\rm C}\limits^ + =\!= $\end{document}O and ?? \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document} $\mathop {\rm C}\limits^ + =\!= $\end{document}O are stable for ≥ 10^?5 s. It is concluded further from the characteristic shapes for the unimolecular loss of CO from C₃H₅\documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document} $\mathop {\rm C}\limits^ + =\!= $\end{document}O ions generated from a series of precursor molecules that the CH₂?CH(CH₃)\documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document} $\mathop {\rm C}\limits^ + =\!= $\end{document}O- and CH₂?CHCH₂\documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document} $\mathop {\rm C}\limits^ + =\!= $\end{document}O-type ions dissociate over different potential surfaces to yield [allyl]⁺ and [2-propenyl]⁺ [C₃H₅]⁺ product ions respectively. Cyclopropyl carbonyl-type ions lose CO with a large kinetic energy release, which points to ring opening in the transition state, whereas this loss from CH₃CH?CH\documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document} $\mathop {\rm C}\limits^ + =\!= $\end{document}O-type ions is proposed to occur via a rate determining 1,2-H shift to yield 2-propenyl cations.     

Effect of long-chain branching on the relation between steady-flow and dynamic viscosity of polyethylene melts

The steady-state viscosity η, the dynamic viscosity η′, and the storage modulus G′ of several high-density and low-density polyethylene melts were investigated by using the Instron rheometer and the Weissenberg rheogoniometer. The theoretical relation between the two viscosities as proposed earlier is:\documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ \eta \left( {\dot \gamma } \right){\rm } = {\rm }\int {H\left( {\ln {\rm }\tau } \right)} {\rm }h\left( \theta \right)g\left( \theta \right)^{{\raise0.7ex\hbox{$3$} \!\mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {3 2}}\right.\kern-\nulldelimiterspace}\!\lower0.7ex\hbox{$2$}}} \tau {\rm }d{\rm }\ln {\rm }\tau $\end{document}, where \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ \theta {\rm } = {\rm }{{\dot \gamma \tau } \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\dot \gamma \tau } 2}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} 2} $\end{document}; \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ {\dot \gamma } $\end{document} is the shear rate, H is the relaxation spectrum, τ is the relaxation time, \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ g\left( \theta \right){\rm } = {\rm }\left( {{2 \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {2 \pi }} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} \pi }} \right)\left[ {\cot ^{ - 1} \theta {\rm } + {\rm }{\theta \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {\theta {\left( {1 + \theta ^2 } \right)}}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {\left( {1 + \theta ^2 } \right)}}} \right] $\end{document}, and \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ h\left( \theta \right){\rm } = {\rm }\left( {{2 \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {2 \pi }} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} \pi }} \right)\left[ {\cot ^{ - 1} \theta {\rm } + {\rm }{{\theta \left( {1{\rm } - {\rm }\theta ^2 } \right)} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\theta \left( {1{\rm } - {\rm }\theta ^2 } \right)} {\left( {1{\rm } + {\rm }\theta ^2 } \right)^2 }}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {\left( {1{\rm } + {\rm }\theta ^2 } \right)^2 }}} \right] $\end{document}. Good agreement between the experimental and calculated values was obtained, without any coordinate shift, for high-density polyethylenes as well as for a low density sample with low n_w, the weight-average number of branch points per molecule. The correlation, however, was poor with low-density samples with large values of the long-chain branching index n_w. This lack of coordination can be related to n_w. The empirical relation of Cox and Merz failed in a similar way.     

The vinyloxonium cation, \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}${\rm CH}_{\rm 2} = {\rm CH - }\mathop {\rm O}\limits^{\rm + } {\rm H}_{\rm 2}$\end{document}, a stable [C2H5O]+ species in the gas phase

The charge stripping mass spectra of [C₂H₅O]⁺ ions permit the clear identification of four distinct species: \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}${\rm CH}_{\rm 3} - {\rm O - }\mathop {\rm C}\limits^{\rm + } {\rm H}_{\rm 2}$\end{document}, \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}${\rm CH}_{\rm 3} - \mathop {\rm C}\limits^{\rm + } {\rm H - OH}$\end{document}, and \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}${\rm CH}_{\rm 2} = {\rm CH - }\mathop {\rm O}\limits^{\rm + } {\rm H}_{\rm 2}$\end{document}. The latter, the vinyloxonium ion, has not been identified before. It is generated from ionized n-butanol and 1,3-propanediol. Its heat of formation is estimated to be 623±12 kJ mol^?1. The charge stripping method is more sensitive to these ion structures than conventional collisional activation, which focuses attention on singly charged fragment ions.     

[C3H3O]+ ions; reacting and non-reacting configurations

Three [C₃H₃O]⁺ ion structures have been characterized. The most stable of these is \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ {\rm CH}_{\rm 2} = {\rm CH} - \mathop {\rm C}\limits^ + = {\rm O} $\end{document} its heat of formation ΔH_f was measured as 749±5 kJ mol^?1. In the μs time frame this ion fragments exclusively by loss of CO, a process which also dominates its collisional activation mass spectrum. The other stable [C₃H₃O]⁺ structures, \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ {\rm CH}\equiv \mathop {\rm C}\limits^ + - {\rm CHOH} $\end{document} and \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ {\rm CH}_{\rm 2} = {\rm C} = \mathop {\rm C}\limits^{\rm + } - {\rm OH}, $\end{document}, were generated from some acetylenic and allenic precursor ions; their heats of formation were estimated to be 830 and 880 kJ mol^?1 respectively. The former ion was also produced by the gas phase protonation of propynal. These ions show loss of C₂H₂ and CO in both their metastable ion and collisional activation mass spectra. The broad Gaussian-type metastable peak for the loss of CO was shown to consist of two components corresponding to gragmentations having different activation energies.     

Kinetics and mechanism of the reactions of the superoxide ion in solutions. II. The kinetics of protonation of the superoxide ion by water and ethanol

The rate constants for the protonation of “free” (that is, solvated) superoxide ions by water and ethanol are equal to 0.5–3.5 ×10^?3M^?1·s^?1 in DMF and AN at 20º. It has been found that the protonation rates for the ion pairs of \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}${\rm O}_{\rm 2}^{\overline {\rm .} }$\end{document} with the Bu₄N⁺ cation are much slower than those for “free” \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}${\rm O}_{\rm 2}^{\overline {\rm .} }$\end{document}. It is suggested that the effects of aprotic solvents on the protonation rates of \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}${\rm O}_{\rm 2}^{\overline {\rm .} }$\end{document} are mainly due to the fact that the proton donors form solvated complexes of different stability in these solvents.     

Potential energy profiles for unimolecular reactions of organic ions: [C3H8N]+ and [C3H7O]+

The unimolecular decompositions of two isomers of [C₃H₈N]⁺, \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ {\rm CH}_{\rm 3} {\rm CH}_{\rm 2} {\rm CH} = \mathop {\rm N}\limits^ + {\rm H}_2 $\end{document} and \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ {\rm CH}_{\rm 3} {\rm CH}_{\rm 2} \mathop {\rm N}\limits^ + {\rm H = CH}_{\rm 2} $\end{document}, are discussed in terms of the potential energy profile over which reaction may be considered to occur. The energy needed to promote slow (metastable) dissociations of either ion is found to be less than that required to cause isomerization to the other structure. This finding is supported by the observation of different decomposition pathways, different metastable peak shapes for C₂H₄ loss, the results of ²H labelling studies, and energy measurements on the two ions. The corresponding potential energy profile for decomposition of the oxygen analogues, \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}${\rm CH}_{\rm 3} {\rm CH}_{\rm 2} {\rm CH =\!= }\mathop {\rm O}\limits^ + {\rm H} $\end{document} and \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ {\rm CH}_{\rm 3} {\rm CH}_{\rm 2} \mathop {\rm O}\limits^ + {\rm = CH}_{\rm 2} $\end{document}, is compared and contrasted with that proposed for the [C₃H₈N]⁺ isomers. This analysis indicates that for the oxygen analogues, the energy needed to decompose either ion is very similar to that required to cause isomerization to the other structure. Consequently, dissociation of either ion is finely balanced with rearrangement to the other and similar reactions are observed. Detailed mechanisms are proposed for loss of H₂O and C₂H₄ from each ion and it is shown that these mechanisms are consistent with ²H and ¹³C labelling studies, the kinetic energy release associated with each decomposition channel, the relative competition between H₂O and C₂H₄ loss and energy measurements.     

Isomerization of the Radical Anions of 6a-Thiathiophthenes

The radical anions of 6a-thiathiophthenes ([1,2]dithiolo[1,5-b] [1,2]dithioles), I(R), convert into those of 4H-thiapyran-4-thiones, III(R), via cis-trans isomerization. The reaction is slowed down when the size of the substituent R in the 2,5-positions of 6a-thiathiophthene increases, and it is prevented by the introduction of a 3,4-polymethylene bridge. The primary and the secondary radical anions, I(R)\documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ ^{\ominus \atop \dot{}} $\end{document} and III(R)\documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ ^{\ominus \atop \dot{}} $\end{document}, respectively, exhibit very similar hyperfine splitting patterns. E.g., in the case of the unsubstituted 6a-thiathiophthene, I(H), and 4H-thiapyran-4-thione, III(H), the proton coupling constants are a_H2,5=6.72 and a_H3,4=1.73 Gauss for I(H)\documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ ^{\ominus \atop \dot{}} $\end{document}, and a_H2,6=6.35 and a_H3,5=2.07 Gauss for III(H)\documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ ^{\ominus \atop \dot{}} $\end{document}. In contrast to I(H)\documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ ^{\ominus \atop \dot{}} $\end{document}, cis-trans isomerization could not thus far be proved to occur with its 1,6-dioxa-analogue, IV(H)\documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ ^{\ominus \atop \dot{}} $\end{document}, since no ESR. spectrum of the radical anion of 4H-pyran-4-thione, V(H), was detected upon reduction of IV(H).     

Structure and formation of gaseous [C4H5O]+ Ions. II–Ions of the type HCC?\documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ \mathop {\rm C}\limits^{\rm + } $\end{document}(OH)(CH3)

Loss of an alkyl group X? from acetylenic alcohols HC?C? CX(OH)(CH₃) and gas phase protonation of HC?C? CO? CH₃ are both shown to yield stable HC?C? \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ \mathop {\rm C}\limits^{\rm + } $\end{document}(OH)(CH₃) ions. Ions of this structure are unique among all other [C₄H₅O]⁺ isomers by having m/z 43 [C₂H₃O]⁺ as base peak in both the metastable ion and collisional activation spectra. It is concluded that the composite metastable peak for formation of m/z 43 corresponds to two distinct reaction profiles which lead to the same product ion, CH₃\documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ \mathop {\rm C}\limits^{\rm + } $\end{document}?O, and neutral, HC?CH. It is further shown that the [C₄H₅O]⁺ ions from related alcohols (like HC?C? CH(OH)(CH₃)) which have an α-H atom available for isomerization into energy rich allenyl type molecular ions, consist of a second stable structure, H₂C?\documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ \mathop {\rm C}\limits^{\rm + } $\end{document}? C(OH)?CH₂.     

Über Chalkogenolate. 171. Reaktion von N,N′-Diphenylformamidin mit Kohlenstoffdisulfid 4. Ester der N,N′-Diphenyl-N-formimidoyldithiocarbamidsäure

On Chalcogenolates. 171. Reaction of N,N′-Diphenyl Formamidine with Carbon Disulfide. 4. Esters of N,N′-Diphenyl-N-Formimidoyl Dithiocarbamic Acid Potassium N,N′-diphenyl N-formimidoyl dithiocarbamate reacts with alkyl halides to yield the corresponding esters \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}${\rm C}_6 {\rm H}_5 {\rm N} = CH - {\rm N}({\rm C}_6 {\rm H}_5) - {\rm CR} - {\rm SR, where R = CH}_3,{\rm C}_2 {\rm H}_5,{\rm CH}_2 - {\rm C}_6 {\rm H}_5,$\end{document} \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}${\rm and (C}_6 {\rm H}_5 {\rm N} = CH - {\rm N}({\rm C}_6 {\rm H}_5) - {\rm CS)}_{\rm 2} = {\rm CH}_2 .$\end{document} The phenyl ester (R = C₆H₅) has been synthesized by reaction of N,N′-diphenyl formamidine with the phenyl ester of chlorodithioformic acid. The prepared compounds have been characterized by means of electron absorption, infrared, nuclear magnetic resonance (¹H and ¹³C), and mass spectra.     

The gas-phase pyrolysis of alkyl nitrites. III. Isopropyl nitrite

The rate of decomposition of isopropyl nitrite (IPN) has been studied in a static system over the temperature range of 130–160°C. For low concentrations of IPN (1–5 × 10^?5M), but with a high total pressure of CF₄ (～0.9 atm) and small extents of reaction (～1%), the first-order rates of acetaldehyde (AcH) formation are a direct measure of reaction (1), since k₃ » k₂(NO): \documentclass{article}\usepackage{amssymb}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ {\rm IPN}\begin{array}{rcl} 1 \\ {\rightleftarrows} \\ 2 \\ \end{array}i - \Pr \mathop {\rm O}\limits^. + {\rm NO},i - \Pr \mathop {\rm O}\limits^. \stackrel{3}{\longrightarrow} {\rm AcH} + {\rm Me}. $\end{document} Addition of large amounts of NO (～0.9 atm) in place of CF₄ almost completely suppressed AcH formation. Addition of large amounts of isobutane – t-BuH – (～0.9 atm) in place of CF₄ at 160°C resulted in decreasing the AcH by 25%. Thus 25% of \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ i - \Pr \mathop {\rm O}\limits^{\rm .} $\end{document} were trapped by the t-BuH (4): \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ i - \Pr \mathop {\rm O}\limits^. + t - {\rm BuH} \stackrel{4}{\longrightarrow} i - \Pr {\rm OH} + (t - {\rm Bu}). $\end{document} The result of adding either NO or t-BuH shows that reaction (1) is the only route for the production of AcH. The rate constant for reaction (1) is given by k₁ = 10^{16.2±0.4–41.0±0.8}/θ sec^?1. Since (E₁ + RT) and ΔH°₁ are identical, within experimental error, both may be equated with D(i-PrO-NO) = 41.6 ± 0.8 kcal/mol and E₂ = 0 ± 0.8 kcal/mol. The thermochemistry leads to the result that \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ \Delta H_f^\circ (i - {\rm Pr}\mathop {\rm O}\limits^{\rm .} ) = - 11.9 \pm 0.8{\rm kcal}/{\rm mol}. $\end{document} From ΔS°₁ and A₁, k₂ is calculated to be 10^10.5±0.4M^?1·sec^?1. From an independent observation that k₆/k₂ = 0.19 ± 0.03 independent of temperature we find E₆ = 0 ± 1 kcal/mol and k₆ = 10^9.8+0.4M^?;1·sec^?1: \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ i - \Pr \mathop {\rm O}\limits^. + {\rm NO} \stackrel{6}{\longrightarrow} {\rm M}_2 {\rm K} + {\rm HNO}. $\end{document} In addition to AcH, acetone (M₂K) and isopropyl alcohol (IPA) are produced in approximately equal amounts. The rate of M₂K formation is markedly affected by the ratio S/V of different reaction vessels. It is concluded that the M₂K arises as the result of a heterogeneous elimination of HNO from IPN. In a spherical reaction vessel the first-order rate of M₂K formation is given by k₅ = 10^9.4–27.0/θ sec^?1: \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ {\rm IPN} \stackrel{5}{\longrightarrow} {\rm M}_2 {\rm K} + {\rm HNO}. $\end{document} IPA is thought to arise via the hydrolysis of IPN, the water being formed from HNO. This elimination process explains previous erroneous results for IPN.     

Bifunctional even-electron ions. II. Fragmentation behaviour of aliphatic ω-hydroxy and ω-methoxy methoxonium ions

Bifunctional methoxonium ions \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ {\rm R} -\mathop {\rm C}\limits^ + ({\rm OCH}_3 ) - ({\rm CH}_2 )_{\rm n} - {\rm OH}({\rm b}) $\end{document} and \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ {\rm R} - \mathop {\rm C}\limits^ + ({\rm OCH}_3 ) - ({\rm CH}_2 )_{\rm n} - {\rm OCH}_3 ({\rm c}) $\end{document} (c) show as the main reactions those caused by functional group interaction, as has already been found for the analogous hydroxonium ions (g). Although there are similarities in the fragmentation behaviour of the isomeric ions b and g, their fragmentation pathways are different, proving b and g as distinct species. The dominant primary fragmentation for b and c is loss of CH₃OH. The hydrogen migrations prior to this reaction have been established by deuterium labelling. The findings on the fragmentation behaviour of the bifunctional methoxonium ions have been extended to the general behaviour of hydroxy and alkoxy substituted alkoxonium ions.     

Structures and formation of \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ \left[{{\rm C}_{{\rm 4}} {\rm H}_{{\rm 8}} } \right]_{}^{_.^ + } $\end{document} ions

Several \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ \left[{{\rm C}_{{\rm 4}} {\rm H}_{{\rm\ 8}} } \right]_{}^{_.^ + } $\end{document} ion isomers yield characteristic and distinguishable collisional activation spectra: \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ \left[{{\rm 1-butene} } \right]_{}^{_.^ + } $\end{document} and/or \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ \left[{{\rm 2-butene} } \right]_{}^{_.^ + } $\end{document} (a-b), \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ \left[{{\rm isobutene} } \right]_{}^{_.^ + } $\end{document} (c) and [cyclobutane]⁺ (e), while the collisional activation spectrum of \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ \left[{{\rm methylcyclopropane} } \right]_{}^{_.^ + } $\end{document} (d) could also arise from a combination of a-b and c. Although ready isomerization may occur for \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ \left[{{\rm C}_{{\rm 4}} {\rm H}_{{\rm 8}} } \right]_{}^{_.^ + } $\end{document} ions of higher internal energy, such as d or e → a, b, and/or c, the isomeric product ions identified from many precursors are consistent with previously postulated rearrangement mechanisms. 1,4-Eliminations of HX occur in 1-alkanols and, in part, 1-buthanethiol and 1-bromobutane. The collisional activation data are consistent with a substantial proportion of 1,3-elimination in 1- and 2-chlorobutane, although 1,2-elimination may also occur in the latter, and the formation of the methylcycloprpane ion from n-butyl vinyl ether and from n-butyl formate. Surprisingly, cyclohexane yields the \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ \left[{{\rm linear butene} } \right]_{}^{_.^ + } $\end{document} ions a-b, not \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ \left[{{\rm cyclobutane} } \right]_{}^{_.^ + } $\end{document}, e.     

Assigning structures to [C2H3O]+ ions

The problem of assigning structures to [C₂H₃O]⁺ ions produced from a wide variety of precursor molecules has been readdressed. The identification of the acetyl cation, \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ {\rm{CH}}_{\rm{3}} \mathop {\rm{C}}\limits^{\rm{ + }} = {\rm{O}} $\end{document}, from metastable peak characteristics and collisional activation mass spectra appears to be straightforward. The structure \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ {\rm{CH}}_{\rm{2}} = \mathop {\rm{C}}\limits^{\rm{ + }} - {\rm{OH}} $\end{document} is also known to exist as a stable ion. A third ion, whose structure may be represented as \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ \mathop {\rm{C}}\limits^{\rm{ + }} {\rm{H}}_{\rm{2}} {\rm{CHO}} $\end{document} or has also been characterized.     

An investigation of the decomposition of the intermediate ions produced by electron-impact. II—[C7H7]+ ions from several halogenotoluenes

The structure and decomposition of the [C₇H₇]⁺ ions produced by electron-impact from o-, m- and p-chlorotoluene, o-, m- and p-bromotoluence, and p-iodotoluence, have been investigated. By determining the relative abundance of normal and metastable ions, these [C₇H₇]⁺ ions at electron energy of 20 eV are shown to be so-called ‘tropylium ions’. The amount of the internal energy of the [C₇H₇]⁺ ion estimated by the relative ion abundance ratios, ? [C₅H₅]⁺/[C₇H₇]⁺ and m*/[C₇H₇]⁺ for the decomposition \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ [{\rm C}_{\rm 7} {\rm H}_{\rm 7}]^ + \mathop \to \limits^{m^* } [{\rm C}_{\rm 5} {\rm H}_{\rm 5}]^ + + {\rm C}_{\rm 2} {\rm H}_{\rm 2} $\end{document}, is in the order iodotoluene > bromotoluene > chlorotoluene. The heats of formation of the activated complexes for the reaction \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ [{\rm C}_{\rm 7} {\rm H}_{\rm 7}]^ + \mathop \to \limits^{m^* } [{\rm C}_{\rm 5} {\rm H}_{\rm 5}]^ + + {\rm C}_{\rm 2} {\rm H}_{\rm 2} $\end{document} were estimated. The values suggest that the decomposing [C₇H₇]⁺ ions from various halogenotoluenes are identical in structure.     

Magnetische Struktur von Columbit,FeNb2O6

The atom parameters of columbite. FeNb₂O₆ and MnNb₂O₆, are refined by neutron diffraction. Low temperature measurements of FeNb₃O₆ provided magnetic reflections hkl with k half integer. From the intensities of the reflections a collinear magnetic structure \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ \overrightarrow {\rm S} _1 = - \overrightarrow {\rm S} _2 = \overrightarrow {\rm S} _3 = \overrightarrow {\rm S} _4 $\end{document} results for the 4 atoms of the half of the magnetic unit cell. The moments lie parallel to the x-axis, φ_a = 0°. The moment is μ = 3.84 μ_B. For MaNb₂O₆ at 2.0°K reflections 010, 101 and 210 are observed additionally. From the observed intensities it is possible to distinguish a collinear model G: \documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ \overrightarrow {\rm S} _1 = - \overrightarrow {\rm S} _2 = \overrightarrow {\rm S} _3 = - \overrightarrow {\rm S} _4 $\end{document} with components G_x, G_z (φ_a = 10°, φ_c = 80°), and a non-collinear model C_x (\documentclass{article}\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}$ \overrightarrow {\rm S} _1 = \overrightarrow {\rm S} _2 = - \overrightarrow {\rm S} _3 = - \overrightarrow {\rm S} _4 $\end{document}) with G_y in favour of the first one.