In this paper, we first follow the first author's previous work to use biquadratic residue characters and cubic residue characters as main tools to tabulate all strong pseudoprimes (spsp's) to the first five or six prime bases, which have the form with odd primes and ; then we tabulate all Carmichael numbers , to the first six prime bases up to 13, which have the form with each prime factor . There are in total 36 such Carmichael numbers, 12 numbers of which are also spsp's to base 17; 5 numbers are spsp's to bases 17 and 19; one number is an spsp to the first 11 prime bases up to 31. As a result the upper bounds for and are lowered from 20- and 22-decimal-digit numbers to a 19-decimal-digit number:
We conjecture that
and give reasons to support this conjecture. The main idea for finding these Carmichael numbers is that we loop on the largest prime factor and propose necessary conditions on to be a strong pseudoprime to the first prime bases. Comparisons of effectiveness with Arnault's, Bleichenbacher's, Jaeschke's, and Pinch's methods for finding (Carmichael) numbers with three prime factors, which are strong pseudoprimes to the first several prime bases, are given.
The main purpose of this paper is to give exact values of for ; to give a lower bound of : ; and to give reasons and numerical evidence of K2- and -spsp's to support the following conjecture: for any , where (resp. ) is the smallest K2- (resp. -) strong pseudoprime to all the first prime bases. For this purpose we describe procedures for computing and enumerating the two kinds of spsp's to the first 9 prime bases. The entire calculation took about 4000 hours on a PC Pentium IV/1.8GHz. (Recall that a K2-spsp is an spsp of the form: with primes and ; and that a -spsp is an spsp and a Carmichael number of the form: with each prime factor mod .)
-strong pseudoprimesThen we call the kernel, the triple the signature, and the height of , respectively. We call a -number if it is a Carmichael number with each prime factor . If is a -number and a strong pseudoprime to the bases for , we call a -spsp . Since -numbers have probability of error (the upper bound of that for the Rabin-Miller test), they often serve as the exact values or upper bounds of (the smallest strong pseudoprime to all the first prime bases). If we know the exact value of , we will have, for integers , a deterministic efficient primality testing algorithm which is easy to implement.
In this paper, we first describe an algorithm for finding -spsp(2)'s, to a given limit, with heights bounded. There are in total -spsp's with heights . We then give an overview of the 21978 - spsp(2)'s and tabulate of them, which are -spsp's to the first prime bases up to ; three numbers are spsp's to the first 11 prime bases up to 31. No -spsp's to the first prime bases with heights were found. We conjecture that there exist no -spsp's to the first prime bases with heights and so that
which was found by the author in an earlier paper. We give reasons to support the conjecture. The main idea of our method for finding those -spsp's is that we loop on candidates of signatures and kernels with heights bounded, subject those candidates of -spsp's and their prime factors to Miller's tests, and obtain the desired numbers. At last we speed our algorithm for finding larger -spsp's, say up to , with a given signature to more prime bases. Comparisons of effectiveness with Arnault's and our previous methods for finding -strong pseudoprimes to the first several prime bases are given.
In this paper we first define pseudoprimes and strong pseudoprimes to quadratic bases with one parameter: , and define the base-counting functions:
and
Then we give explicit formulas to compute B and SB, and prove that, for odd composites ,
and point out that these are best possible. Finally, based on one-parameter quadratic-base pseudoprimes, we provide a probable prime test, called the One-Parameter Quadratic-Base Test (OPQBT), which passed by all primes and passed by an odd composite odd primes) with probability of error . We give explicit formulas to compute , and prove that
The running time of the OPQBT is asymptotically 4 times that of a Rabin-Miller test for worst cases, but twice that of a Rabin-Miller test for most composites. We point out that the OPQBT has clear finite group (field) structure and nice symmetry, and is indeed a more general and strict version of the Baillie-PSW test. Comparisons with Gantham's RQFT are given.