Asymptotic behavior for an almost periodic,strongly dissipative wave equation

This paper deals with asymptotic behavior for (weak) solutions of the equation $\text{u}{}_{\mathrm{tt}}\text{? Δu + β(u}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{) ? ?(t, x)}$, on $\text{R}$⁺ × Ω; u(t, x) = 0, on $\text{R}$⁺ × ?Ω. If $\text{?∈L∞(R}{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{,L}{}^2\text{(Ω))}$ and β is coercive, we prove that the solutions are bounded in the energy space, under weaker assumptions than those used by G. Prouse in a previous work. If in addition $\text{?}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{∈S}{}^2\text{(R}{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{,L}{}^2\text{(Ω))}$ and ? is srongly almost-periodic, we prove for strongly monotone β that all solutions are asymptotically almost-periodic in the energy space. The assumptions made on β are much less restrictive than those made by G. Prouse: mainly, we allow β to be multivalued, and in the one-dimensional case β need not be defined everywhere.     

Existence globale pour une classe d'équations d'ondes perturbées

In this paper we prove a global well-posedness result for the following Cauchy problem:

where the initial data $\text{(f,g)∈}\text{H}\text{?}{}^1\text{(}\text{R}{}^3\text{)×L}{}^2\text{(}\text{R}{}^3\text{)}$ are compactly supported, 1?α<5, $\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(t,x)∈L}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{(}\text{R}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{×}\text{R}{}_{\mathrm{x}}{}^3\text{)}$, $\text{V(t,x)∈L}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{(}\text{R}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{;L}{}^3\text{(}\text{R}{}^3{}_{\mathrm{x}}\text{))}$. To cite this article: N. Visciglia, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Ser. I 338 (2004).     

Concrete model theory for a class of operators with unitary part

Let m and v_t, 0 ? t ? 2π be measures on T = [0, 2π] with m smooth. Consider the direct integral $\text{H}$ = ⊕L²(v^t) dm(t) and the operator $\text{(L?)(t, λ) = e}{}^{\mathrm{?i\lambda }}\text{?(t, λ) ? 2e}{}^{\mathrm{?i\lambda }}\text{∫}{}_{\mathrm{t}}{}^{\mathrm{2\pi }}\text{∫}{}_{\mathrm{T}}\text{?(s, x) e(s, t) dv}{}_{\mathrm{s}}\text{(x) dm(s)}$ on $\text{H}$, where e(s, t) = exp ∫_s^t ∫_Tdv_λ(θ) dm(λ). Let μ_t be the measure defined by $\text{∫}{}_{\mathrm{T}}\text{?(x) dμ}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{(x) = ∫}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{t}}\text{∫}{}_{\mathrm{T}}\text{?(x) dv}{}_{\mathrm{s}}\text{dm(s)}$ for all continuous ?, and let ?_t(z) = exp[?∫ (e^iθ + z)(e^iθ ? z)^?1dμ_t(gq)]. Call {v_t} regular iff for all $\text{t, ¦?}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{(e}{}^{\mathrm{i\theta }}\text{)¦ = ¦?}{}_{\mathrm{2\pi }}\text{(e}{}^{\mathrm{i\theta }}\text{)¦}$ for 1 a.e.     

A comparison of different compactness notions in fuzzy topological spaces

Starting from a defining differential equation $\text{(}\text{?}\text{?t}\text{) W(λ, t, u) = (}\text{λ(u ? t)}\text{p(t)}\text{) W(λ, t, u)}$ of the kernel of an exponential operator $\text{S}{}_{\mathrm{\lambda }}\text{(?, t) = ∫}{}_{\mathrm{?\infty }}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{W(λ, t, u)?(u) du}$ with normalization ∫_?∞^∞W(λ, t, u) du = 1, we determine S_λ for various p(t) including; for example, p(t) a quadratic polynomial, all the known exponential operators are recovered and some new ones are constructed. It is shown that all the exponential operators are approximation operators. Further approximation properties of these operators are discussed. For example, functions satisfying $\text{∥ S}{}_{\mathrm{\lambda }}\text{(?, t) ? ?(t)∥ = O(λ}{}^{\mathrm{?\alpha }}\text{)}$ are characterized. Several results of C. P. May are also improved.     

Weak solutions for a nonlinear dispersive equation

In this paper we study the existence, uniqueness, and regularity of the solutions for the Cauchy problem for the evolution equation $\text{u}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{+ (f (u))}{}_{\mathrm{x}}\text{? u}{}_{\mathrm{xxt}}\text{= g(x, t), (}{}^1\text{)}\text{where}\text{u = u(x, t), x}$ is in (0, 1), 0 ? t ? T, T is an arbitrary positive real number,f(s)?C¹$\text{R}$, and g(x, t)?L^∞(0, T; L²(0, 1)). We prove the existence and uniqueness of the weak solutions for (¹) using the Galerkin method and a compactness argument such as that of J. L. Lions. We obtain regular solutions using eigenfunctions of the one-dimensional Laplace operator as a basis in the Galerkin method.     

The Tjon-Wu equation in Banach space settings

The authors investigate the Tjon-Wu (TW) equation: (TW)

$\text{?u}\text{?t}\text{(t, x) + u(t, x) = ∫}{}_{\mathrm{x}}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{dy}\text{y}\text{∫}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{y}}\text{u(t, y ? z) u(t, z)dz, u(0, x) = u}{}_0\text{(x)}$

, which has been obtained from a classical Boltzmann equation by applying the Abel transform. (TW) is considered as an ordinary differential equation first in the space L²={u:[0,∞)→R|∫_x^∞|u(x)|²e^xdx < + ∞}The authors establish existence and uniqueness of solutions in disks of codimension 2 around 0 and around e^?x. Asymptotic stability of these latter functions is also established. The basic tool is an unusual eigenvalue property of the nonlinear right-hand side of (TW) which leads to a reformulation of (TW) as a differential equation in l². Similar results are established in L¹ working with (TW) directly.     

Coding theory in white Gaussian channel with feedback

The message m = {m(t)} is a Gaussian process that is to be transmitted through the white Gaussian channel with feedback: $\text{Y(t) = ∫}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{t}}\text{F(s, Y}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{s}}\text{, m)ds + W(t)}$. Under the average power constraint, $\text{E[F}{}^2\text{(s, Y}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{s}}\text{, m)] ≤ P}{}_0$, we construct causally the optimal coding, in the sense that the mutual information I_t(m, Y) between the message m and the channel output Y (up to t) is maximized. The optimal coding is presented by $\text{Y(t) = ∫}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{t}}\text{A(s)[m(s) ?}\text{m}\text{?}\text{(s)] ds + W(t)}$, where $\text{m}\text{?}\text{(s) = E[m(s) ¦ Y(u), 0 ≤ u ≤ s]}$ and A(s) is a positive function such that $\text{A}{}^2\text{(s) E |m(s) ?}\text{m}\text{?}\text{(s)|}{}^2\text{= P}{}_0$.     

Minimax estimators for a multinormal precision matrix

Let S_p×p ～ Wishart (Σ, k), Σ unknown, k > p + 1. Minimax estimators of Σ^?1 are given for L₁, an Empirical Bayes loss function; and L₂, a standard loss function (R_i ≡ E(L_i ∣ Σ), i = 1, 2). The estimators are $\text{Σ}\text{?}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{=}\text{a}\text{S}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{+}\text{br}\text{(S)I}{}_{\mathrm{p\times p}}$, a, b ≥ 0, r(·) a functional on $\text{R}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>p(p+2)</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}$. Stein, Efron, and Morris studied the special cases $\text{Σ}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>a</mtext>}}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{=}\text{a}\text{S}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{(E}\text{Σ}\text{?}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>k?p?1</mtext>}}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{= Σ}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{)}$ and $\text{Σ}\text{?}{}_1{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{=}\text{a}\text{S}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{+ (b/tr S)I}$, for certain, a, b. From their work $\text{R}{}_1\text{(Σ}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{,}\text{Σ}\text{?}{}_1{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{; S) ≤ R}{}_1\text{(Σ}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{,}\text{Σ}\text{?}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>a</mtext>}}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{; S) (?Σ)}$, a = k ? p ? 1, b = p² + p ? 2; whereas, we prove $\text{R}{}_2\text{(Σ}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{Σ}\text{?}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>a</mtext>}}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{; S) ≤}\text{R}{}_2\text{(Σ}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{,}\text{Σ}\text{?}{}_1{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{; S) (?Σ)}$. The reversal is surprising because $\text{L}{}_1\text{(Σ}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{,}\text{Σ}\text{?}{}_1{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{; S) →}\text{L}{}_2\text{(Σ}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{,}\text{Σ}\text{?}{}_1{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{; S)}$ a.e. (for a particular L₂). Assume $\text{R}$ (compact) ? $\text{S}$, $\text{S}$ the set of p × p p.s.d. matrices. A “divergence theorem” on functions F_p×p : $\text{R}$ → $\text{S}$ implies identities for R_i, i = 1, 2. Then, conditions are given for $\text{R}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(Σ}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{,}\text{Σ}\text{?}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{; S) ≤}\text{R}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(Σ}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{,}\text{Σ}\text{?}{}_1{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{; S) ≤}\text{R}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(Σ}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{,}\text{Σ}\text{?}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>a</mtext>}}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{; S) (?Σ)}$, i = 1, 2. Most of our results concern estimators with r(S) = t(U)/tr(S), U = p ∣S∣^1/p/tr(S).     

On asymptotic solutions of the renewal equation

Consider the renewal equation in the form (¹) $\text{u(t) = g(t) + ∝}{}_{\mathrm{o}}{}^{\mathrm{t}}\text{u(t ? τ) ?(τ) dτ}$, where $\text{?(t)}$ is a probability density on [0, ∞) and lim_{t → ∞}g(t) = g₀. Asymptotic solutions of (¹) are given in the case when f(t) has no expectation, i.e., $\text{∝}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{t?(t)dt = ∞}$. These results complement the classical theorem of Feller under the assumption that f(t) possesses finite expectation.     

On Lp estimates for the wave equation

New and more elementary proofs are given of two results due to W. Littman: (1) Let $\text{n ? 2, p ?}\text{2n}\text{(n ? 1)}$. The estimate $\text{∫∫ (¦▽u¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{+ ¦u}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{) dx dt ? C ∫∫ ¦□u¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{dx dt}$ cannot hold for all u?C₀^∞(Q), Q a cube in $\text{R}{}^{\mathrm{<mi\; mathvariant="italic"\; is="true">n</mi>}}\text{× R}$, some constant C. (2) Let n ? 2, p ≠ 2. The estimate $\text{∫ (¦▽(t)¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{+ ¦u}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{(t)¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{) dx ? C(t) ∫ (¦▽u(0)¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{+ ¦u}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{(0)¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{) dx}$ cannot hold for all C^∞ solutions of the wave equation □u = 0 in $\text{R}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{x R}$; all t ?$\text{R}$; some function C: $\text{R}$ → $\text{R}$.     

The virial theorem in relativistic quantum mechanics

For a class of potentials including the Coulomb potential q = μr^?1 with ¦ μ ¦ < 1 (1) (i.e., atomic numbers Z ? 137), the virial theorem $\text{(u, α ·}\text{p}\text{u) = (u, r(}\text{?q}\text{?r}\text{)u)}$ is shown to hold, u being an eigenfunction of the operator

$\text{Hu = TU : = (α ·}\text{p}\text{+ β + q)u}$

,

$\text{D(H) = {u ¦ u ∈ [H}{}_{\mathrm{loc}}{}^1\text{(}\text{R}\text{+}{}^3\text{)]}{}^4\text{, r}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>?</mtext><mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{u, TU ∈ [L}{}^2\text{(R)}{}^3\text{]}{}^4\text{}}$

($\text{R}$₊³ := $\text{R}$?{0}). The result implies in particular that H with (1) does not have any eigenvalues embedded in the continuum. The proof uses a scale transformation.     

Square roots of elliptic operators

Consider an elliptic sesquilinear form defined on $\text{V}$ × $\text{V}$ by $\text{J[u, v] = ∫}{}_{\mathrm{\Omega }}\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{jk}}\text{?u}\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{}\text{?}\text{t6v}\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{+ a}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{?u}\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{v}\text{?}\text{+ α}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{u}\text{}\text{?}\text{t6v}\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{+ au}\text{v}\text{?}\text{dx}$, where $\text{V}$ is a closed subspace of $\text{H}{}^1\text{(Ω)}$ which contains $\text{C}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{(Ω)}$, Ω is a bounded Lipschitz domain in $\text{R}$ⁿ, $\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{jk}}\text{, a}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{, α}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{, a ? L}{}_{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{(Ω),}\text{and Re}\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{jk}}\text{ζ}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{ζ}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{? κ > 0}$ for all ζ?$\text{C}$ⁿ with ¦ζ¦ = 1. Let L be the operator with largest domain satisfying J[u, v] = (Lu, v) for all υ∈$\text{V}$. Then L + λI is a maximal accretive operator in $\text{L}{}_2\text{(Ω)}$ for λ a sufficiently large real number. It is proved that $\text{(L + λI)}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}$ is a bounded operator from $\text{V}$ to $\text{L}{}_2\text{(Ω)}$ provided mild regularity of the coefficients is assumed. In addition it is shown that if the coefficients depend differentiably on a parameter t in an appropriate sense, then the corresponding square root operators also depend differentiably on t. The latter result is new even when the forms J are hermitian.     

Concrete model theory for a class of operators

The operator $\text{L?(t, λ) = e}{}^{\mathrm{?i\lambda }}\text{(t, λ) ? 2e}{}^{\mathrm{?i\lambda }}\text{∝}{}_{\mathrm{t}}{}^{\mathrm{2\pi }}\text{∝}{}_{\mathrm{T}}\text{?(s, x) e(s, t) dv}{}_{\mathrm{s}}\text{(x) dm(s)}$ acting on H=∝₀^2π⊕L²(v_t), where m and v_t, 0 ? t ? 2π are measures on [0, 2π] with m smooth and e(s, t) = exp[?∝_t^s∝_Tdv_λ(θ) dm(λ)], satisfies $\text{rank}\text{(I ? LL}{}^1\text{) =}\text{rank}\text{(I ? L}{}^1\text{L) = 1}$. It is, therefore, unitarily equivalent to a scalar Sz.-Nagy-Foia? canonical model. The purpose of this paper is to determine the model explicitly and to give a formula for the unitary equivalence.     

On the Cauchy problem for the generalized Benjamin–Ono equation with small initial data

We prove global well-posedness results for small initial data in $\text{H}{}^{\mathrm{s}}\text{(}\text{R}\text{),}\text{s>s}{}_{\mathrm{k}}$, and in , s_k=1/2?1/k, for the generalized Benjamin–Ono equation $\text{?}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{u+}\text{H}\text{?}{}^2{}_{\mathrm{x}}\text{u+?}{}_{\mathrm{x}}\text{(u}{}^{\mathrm{k+1}}\text{)=0,}\text{k?4}$. We also consider the cases k=2,3. To cite this article: L. Molinet, F. Ribaud, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Ser. I 337 (2003).     

Levy's stochastic area formula in higher dimensions

Let (W_t) = (W¹_t,W²_t,…,W^d_t), d ? 2, be a d-dimensional standard Brownian motion and let A(t) be a bounded measurable function from $\text{R}$⁺ into the space of d × d skew-symmetric matrices and x(t) such a function into $\text{R}$^d. A class of stochastic processes (L_t^A,x), a particular example of which is Levy's “stochastic area” $\text{L}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{=}\text{1}\text{2}\text{∝}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{?t}}\text{(W}{}^1{}_{\mathrm{s}}\text{,dW}{}^2{}_{\mathrm{s}}\text{? W}{}^2{}_{\mathrm{s}}\text{,dW}{}^1{}_{\mathrm{s}}\text{)}$, is dealt with.The joint characteristic function of W_t and L₁^A,x is calculated and based on this result a formula for fundamental solutions for the hypoelliptic operators which generate the diffusions (W_t,L_t^A,x) is given.     

An ∞-dimensional inhomogeneous Langevin's equation

On a modified space Φ′ from the space $\text{J}$′ of tempered distributions, it is proven that a stochastic equation, $\text{X(t) = γ + W(t) + ∝}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{t}}\text{L}{}^1\text{(s) X(s) ds}$, has a unique solution, where W(t) is a Φ′-valued Brownian motion independent of a Φ′-valued Gaussian random variable γ and $\text{L}{}^1\text{(s)}$ is an integro-differential operator. As an application, a fluctuaton result (or central limit theorem) is shown for interacting diffusions.     

About some problems of spectral synthesis

For a given pair $\text{(A,b)∈}\text{R}{}^{\mathrm{n\times n}}\text{×}\text{R}{}^{\mathrm{n\times 1}}$ such that A is cyclic and b is a cyclic generator (with respect to A) of $\text{R}{}^{\mathrm{n\times 1}}$, it is shown that for every nonnegative integer m we can find a nonnegative integer t and a sequence $\text{{f}{}_{\mathrm{j\}}}{}^{\mathrm{t}}{}_{\mathrm{j=0}}\text{,f}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{∈}\text{R}{}^{\mathrm{1\times n}}$,so that a the zeros of the rational function det P(z), where $\text{P(z) = zI ? A ? ∑}{}^{\mathrm{t}}{}_{\mathrm{j=0}}\text{z}{}^{\mathrm{-(m+j)}}\text{b?}$_f, lie in the open unit disc in the complex plane. The result is directly applicable to a stabilizability problem for linear systems with a time delay in control action.     

Diffusion with interactions between two types of particles and Pressureless gas equations

We construct two d-dimensional independent diffusions $\text{X}{}_{\mathrm{t}}{}^{\mathrm{a}}\text{=a+∫}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{t}}\text{u(X}{}_{\mathrm{s}}{}^{\mathrm{a}}\text{,s)}\text{d}\text{s+νB}{}_{\mathrm{t}}{}^{\mathrm{a}}\text{,}\text{X}{}_{\mathrm{t}}{}^{\mathrm{b}}\text{=b+∫}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{t}}\text{u(X}{}_{\mathrm{s}}{}^{\mathrm{b}}\text{,s)}\text{d}\text{s+νB}{}_{\mathrm{t}}{}^{\mathrm{b}}$, with the same viscosity ν≠0 and the same drift u(x,t)=(pρ_t^a(x)v₁+(1?p)ρ_t^b(x)v₂)/(pρ_t^a(x)+(1?p)ρ_t^b(x)), where ρ_t^a,ρ_t^b are respectively the density of X_t^a and X_t^b. Here $\text{a,b,v}{}_1\text{,v}{}_2\text{∈}\text{R}{}^{\mathrm{d}}$ and p∈(0,1) are given. We show that $\text{(ρ}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{(x)=pρ}{}_{\mathrm{t}}{}^{\mathrm{a}}\text{(x)+(1?p)ρ}{}_{\mathrm{t}}{}^{\mathrm{b}}\text{(x),u(x,t):}\text{t?0,}\text{x∈}\text{R}{}^{\mathrm{d}}\text{)}$ is the unique weak solution of the following pressureless gas system

such that $\text{ρ}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{(x)}\text{d}\text{x→pδ}{}_{\mathrm{a}}\text{+(1?p)δ}{}_{\mathrm{b}}\text{,}\text{u(x,t)ρ}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{(x)}\text{d}\text{x→pv}{}_1\text{δ}{}_{\mathrm{a}}\text{+(1?p)v}{}_2\text{δ}{}_{\mathrm{b}}$ as t→0+. To cite this article: A. Dermoune, S. Filali, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Ser. I 337 (2003).     

Singular perturbation problems for linear parabolic differential operators of arbitrary order

We consider the first initial-boundary value problem for $\text{(}\text{?u}\text{?t}\text{) + ?L}{}_1\text{u + L}{}_0\text{u = f(L}{}_0$ and L₁ are linear elliptic partial differential operators) and investigate the properties of u(x, t, ?) as ? ↓ 0 in the maximum norm. Special attention is paid to approximations obtained by the boundary layer method. We use a priori estimates.     

Product formulas for semigroups with elliptic generators

Real constant coefficient nth order elliptic operators, Q, which generate strongly continuous semigroups on L²($\text{R}$^k) are analyzed in terms of the elementary generator,

$\text{A = (?n)}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>(</mtext><mtext>n</mtext><mtext>2</mtext><mtext>\; ?\; 1</mtext>}}\text{)(n!)}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{∑}\text{k}\text{j = 1}\text{?}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{j}}{}^{\mathrm{n}}$

, for n even. Integral operators are defined using the fundamental solutions p_n(x, t) to u_t = Au and using real polynomials q_l,…, q_k on $\text{R}$^m by the formula, for q = (q_l,…, q_k),

$\text{(F(t)?)(x) = ∫}$

_$\text{R}$m

$\text{?(x + q(z)) P}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{(z, t)dz}$

. It is determined when, strongly on L²($\text{R}$^k),

$\text{e}{}^{\mathrm{tQ}}\text{=}\text{lim}\text{j → ∞}\text{F}\text{t}\text{j}{}^{\mathrm{j}}$

. If n = 2 or k = 1, this can always be done. Otherwise the symbol of Q must have a special form.