The role of solvent viscosity in dilute-solution polymer rheology

Capillary viscometry was performed on dilute non-Newtonian solutions of monodisperse polystyrene in theta solvents. The solvents, blends of low-molecular-weight polystyrene with styrene, had viscosities (η_s) that were varied from 0.22–27 Pa s. Data reduction of the dilute limit, [η]/[η₀] vs. β = [η₀]η_sM$\text{γ}\text{?}$/RT (where $\text{γ}\text{?}$ is shear rate) revealed a parametric dependence on η_s that has not before been reported and is not predicted by most molecular theories of polymer dynamics. It is suggested that an internal viscosity model can explain such a phenomenon.     

Asymptotic analysis of linearly elastic shells. II. Justification of flexural shell equations

We consider as in Part I a family of linearly elastic shells of thickness 2?, all having the same middle surfaceS=?(?)?R ³, whereω?R ² is a bounded and connected open set with a Lipschitz-continuous boundary, and?∈l ³ (?;R ³). The shells are clamped on a portion of their lateral face, whose middle line is?(γ ₀), whereγ ₀ is any portion of?ω withlength γ ₀>0. We make an essential geometrical assumption on the middle surfaceS and on the setγ ₀, which states that the space of inextensional displacements $$\begin{gathered} V_F (\omega ) = \{ \eta = (\eta _i ) \in H^1 (\omega ) \times H^1 (\omega ) \times H^2 (\omega ); \hfill \\ \eta _i = \partial _v \eta _3 = 0 on \gamma _0 ,\gamma _{\alpha \beta } (\eta ) = 0 in \omega \} , \hfill \\ \end{gathered}$$ where $\gamma _{\alpha \beta }$ (η) are the components of the linearized change is metric tensor ofS, contains non-zero functions. This assumption is satisfied in particular ifS is a portion of cylinder and?(γ ₀) is contained in a generatrix ofS. We show that, if the applied body force density isO(? ²) with respect to?, the fieldu(?)=(u _i (?)), whereu _i (?) denote the three covariant components of the displacement of the points of the shell given by the equations of three-dimensional elasticity, once “scaled” so as to be defined over the fixed domain Ω=ω×]?1, 1[, converges as?→0 inH ¹(Ω) to a limitu, which is independent of the transverse variable. Furthermore, the averageζ=1/2ts _?1 ¹ u dx ₃, which belongs to the spaceV _F (ω), satisfies the (scaled) two-dimensional equations of a “flexural shell”, viz., $$\frac{1}{3}\mathop \smallint \limits_\omega a^{\alpha \beta \sigma \tau } \rho _{\sigma \tau } (\zeta )\rho _{\alpha \beta } (\eta )\sqrt {a } dy = \mathop \smallint \limits_\omega \left\{ {\mathop \smallint \limits_{ - 1}^1 f^i dx_3 } \right\} \eta _i \sqrt {a } dy$$ for allη=(η _i ) ∈V _F (ω), where $a^{\alpha \beta \sigma \tau }$ are the components of the two-dimensional elasticity tensor of the surfaceS, $$\begin{gathered} \rho _{\alpha \beta } (\eta ) = \partial _{\alpha \beta } \eta _3 - \Gamma _{\alpha \beta }^\sigma \partial _\sigma \eta _3 + b_\beta ^\sigma \left( {\partial _\alpha \eta _\sigma - \Gamma _{\alpha \sigma }^\tau \eta _\tau } \right) \hfill \\ + b_\alpha ^\sigma \left( {\partial _\beta \eta _\sigma - \Gamma _{\beta \sigma }^\tau \eta _\tau } \right) + b_\alpha ^\sigma {\text{|}}_\beta \eta _\sigma - c_{\alpha \beta } \eta _3 \hfill \\ \end{gathered} $$ are the components of the linearized change of curvature tensor ofS, $\Gamma _{\alpha \beta }^\sigma$ are the Christoffel symbols ofS, $b_\alpha ^\beta$ are the mixed components of the curvature tensor ofS, andf ⁱ are the scaled components of the applied body force. Under the above assumptions, the two-dimensional equations of a “flexural shell” are therefore justified.     

Bulk rheology of dilute suspensions in viscoelastic liquids

A theoretical relation is derived for the bulk stress in dilute suspensions of neutrally buoyant, uniform size, spherical drops in a viscoelastic liquid medium. This is achieved by the classic volume-averaging procedure of Landau and Lifschitz which excludes Brownian motion. The disturbance velocity and pressure fields interior and exterior to a second-order fluid drop suspended in a simple shear flow of another second-order fluid were derived by Peery [9] for small Weissenberg number (We), omitting inertia. The results of the averaging procedure include terms up to orderWe ². The shear viscosity of a suspension of Newtonian droplets in a viscoelastic liquid is derived as $$\eta _{susp} = \eta _0 \left[ {1 + \frac{{5k + 2}}{{2(k + 1)}}\varphi - \frac{{\psi _{10}^2 \dot \gamma ^2 }}{{\eta _0^2 }}\varphi f_1 (k, \varepsilon _0 )} \right],$$ whereη ₀, andω ₁₀ are the viscosity and primary normal stress coefficient of the medium,ε ₀ is a ratio typically between ?0.5 and ?0.86,k is the ratio of viscosities of disperse and continuous phases, and \(\dot \gamma \) is the bulk rate of shear strain. This relation includes, in addition to the Taylor result, a shear-thinning factor (f ₁ > 0) which is associated with the elasticity of the medium. This explains observed trends in relative shear viscosity of suspensions with rigid particles reported by Highgate and Whorlow [6] and with drops reported by Han and King [8]. The expressions (atO (We ²)) for normal-stress coefficients do not include any strain rate dependence; the calculated values of primary normal-stress difference match values observed at very low strain rates.     

Dissipative interface waves and the transient response of a three-dimensional sliding interface with Coulomb friction

We investigate the linearized response of two elastic half-spaces sliding past one another with constant Coulomb friction to small three-dimensional perturbations. Starting with the assumption that friction always opposes slip velocity, we derive a set of linearized boundary conditions relating perturbations of shear traction to slip velocity. Friction introduces an effective viscosity transverse to the direction of the original sliding, but offers no additional resistance to slip aligned with the original sliding direction. The amplitude of transverse slip depends on a nondimensional parameter η=c_sτ₀/μv₀, where τ₀ is the initial shear stress, 2v₀ is the initial slip velocity, μ is the shear modulus, and c_s is the shear wave speed. As η→0, the transverse shear traction becomes negligible, and we find an azimuthally symmetric Rayleigh wave trapped along the interface. As η→∞, the inplane and antiplane wavesystems frictionally couple into an interface wave with a velocity that is directionally dependent, increasing from the Rayleigh speed in the direction of initial sliding up to the shear wave speed in the transverse direction. Except in these frictional limits and the specialization to two-dimensional inplane geometry, the interface waves are dissipative. In addition to forward and backward propagating interface waves, we find that for η>1, a third solution to the dispersion relation appears, corresponding to a damped standing wave mode. For large-amplitude perturbations, the interface becomes isotropically dissipative. The behavior resembles the frictionless response in the extremely strong perturbation limit, except that the waves are damped. We extend the linearized analysis by presenting analytical solutions for the transient response of the medium to both line and point sources on the interface. The resulting self-similar slip pulses consist of the interface waves and head waves, and help explain the transmission of forces across fracture surfaces. Furthermore, we suggest that the η→∞ limit describes the sliding interface behind the crack edge for shear fracture problems in which the absolute level of sliding friction is much larger than any interfacial stress changes.     

New type of equation for the relation between viscosity and particle content in suspensions

Many disperse systems show a typical non-Newtonian flow at relatively high concentrations of the disperse particle. However, two Newtonian viscosities η_∞ and η₀ can be, respectively, determined at high and low rates of shear. Expect for very low particle content, η_∞/η_s is proportional to exp(mϕ), where η_s is a medium viscosity, m a constant which might reflect the particle-particle interaction and ϕ the volume fraction. In considering this relationship, a new type of equation which describes the relation between the zero shear relative viscosity η_r0( ≡ η₀/η_s) of the disperse system and ϕ is proposed as follows. ln η_r0 = A(p)ϕ + am³ϕ², where A(p), the Einstein-Simha constant, is a function of the axial ratio p of dispersing particles, and a is a constant (⋍ 0.03) which depends slightly on the particle shape.The equation has been compared with the experimental results obtained for several disperse systems. A number of disperse systems of spherical particles are described well by the choice A(p) = 2.5 and a = 0.027, and a system of rod-like particles with p = 50 by the choice A(p) = 215.6 and a = 0.033. m for rod-like particles is larger than that for spherical particles.     

Newtonian,power law,and infinite shear flow characteristics of concentrated slurries using percolation theory concepts

There is a strong interest today in concentrated particulate-filled dispersion and slurries in both polymeric and Newtonian fluids. This paper reviews and extends theoretical approaches using percolation theory concepts to characterize the rheological behavior of fluids filled with particulate solids. First, a previously proposed limiting, zero shear viscosity model based on percolation theory concepts is reviewed. This model has been primarily tested with rigid fillers in a Newtonian carrier and polymeric fluids. Second, all Newtonian fluid-based slurries that have a high concentration of filler become pseudoplastic, shear-thinning slurries at some threshold shear rate. A new theory is reviewed and new data are evaluated that correlate the power law constant, n, to cluster formation of the fillers suspended in the fluids in shear flow. Slurry systems reported here cover a size range from 58 nm to 200 μm. Third, this cluster percolation-based rheological analysis is then extended to a newly proposed model for the calculation of the ratio of infinite shear, η_∞, to the zero shear viscosity, η₀. Using literature data, it is demonstrated that measurements of the viscosity ratio, η_∞/η₀, correlate with the power law through the use of an energy dissipation-based model for Bingham rheological fluids.     

Asymptotic analysis of linearly elastic shells. I. Justification of membrane shell equations

We consider a family of linearly elastic shells with thickness 2?, clamped along their entire lateral face, all having the same middle surfaceS=φ(?ω) ?R ³, whereω ?R ² is a bounded and connected open set with a Lipschitz-continuous boundaryγ, andφ ∈l ³ ( $\overline \omega$ ;R ³). We make an essential geometrical assumption on the middle surfaceS, which is satisfied ifγ andφ are smooth enough andS is “uniformly elliptic”, in the sense that the two principal radii of curvature are either both>0 at all points ofS, or both<0 at all points ofS. We show that, if the applied body force density isO(1) with respect to?, the fieldtu(?)=(u _i(?)), whereu _i (?) denote the three covariant components of the displacement of the points of the shell given by the equations of three-dimensional elasticity, one “scaled” so as to be defined over the fixed domain Ω=ω×]?1, 1[, converges inH ¹(Ω)×H ¹(Ω)×L ²(Ω) as?→0 to a limitu, which is independent of the transverse variable. Furthermore, the averageξ=1/2ε _?1 ¹ u dx ₃, which belongs to the space $$V_M (\omega ) = H_0^1 (\omega ) \times H_0^1 (\omega ) \times L^2 (\omega ),$$ satisfies the (scaled) two-dimensional equations of a “membrane shell” viz., $$\mathop \smallint \limits_\omega a^{\alpha \beta \sigma \tau } \gamma _{\sigma \tau } (\zeta )\gamma _{\alpha \beta } (\eta ) \sqrt \alpha dy = \mathop \smallint \limits_\omega \left\{ {\mathop \smallint \limits_{ - 1}^1 f^i dx_3 } \right\}\eta _i \sqrt a dy$$ for allη=(η _i) εV _M(ω), where $a^{\alpha \beta \sigma \tau }$ are the components of the two-dimensional elasticity tensor of the surfaceS, $$\gamma _{\alpha \beta } (\eta ) = \frac{1}{2}\left( {\partial _{\alpha \eta \beta } + \partial _{\beta \eta \alpha } } \right) - \Gamma _{\alpha \beta }^\sigma \eta _\sigma - b_{\alpha \beta \eta 3} $$ are the components of the linearized change of metric tensor ofS, $\Gamma _{\alpha \beta }^\sigma$ are the Christoffel symbols ofS, $b_{\alpha \beta }$ are the components of the curvature tensor ofS, andf ⁱ are the scaled components of the applied body force. Under the above assumptions, the two-dimensional equations of a “membrane shell” are therefore justified.     

The approach of solutions of nonlinear diffusion equations to travelling front solutions

The paper is concerned with the asymptotic behavior as t → ∞ of solutions u(x, t) of the equation u_t—u_xx—∞;(u)=O, x∈(—∞, ∞) , in the case ∞(0)=∞(1)=0, ∞′(0)<0, ∞′(1)<0. Commonly, a travelling front solution u=U(x-ct), U(-∞)=0, U(∞)=1, exists. The following types of global stability results for fronts and various combinations of them will be given.

1. Let u(x, 0)=u ₀(x) satisfy 0≦u ₀≦1. Let \(a\_ = \mathop {\lim \sup u0}\limits_{x \to - \infty } {\text{(}}x{\text{), }}\mathop {\lim \inf u0}\limits_{x \to \infty } {\text{(}}x{\text{)}}\) . Then u approaches a translate of U uniformly in x and exponentially in time, if a_? is not too far from 0, and a₊ not too far from 1.
2. Suppose \(\int\limits_{\text{0}}^{\text{1}} {f{\text{(}}u{\text{)}}du} > {\text{0}}\) . If a _? and a ₊ are not too far from 0, but u₀ exceeds a certain threshold level for a sufficiently large x-interval, then u approaches a pair of diverging travelling fronts.
3. Under certain circumstances, u approaches a “stacked” combination of wave fronts, with differing ranges.

     

Remainder estimates for the asymptotics of elliptic eigenvalue problems with indefinite weights

Let A be a positive self-adjoint elliptic operator of order 2m on a bounded open set Ω ?? ^k . We consider the variational eigenvalue problem (P) $$\mathcal{A}u = \lambda r{\text{(}}x{\text{)}}u,{\text{ }}x \in \Omega ,$$ , with Dirichlet or Neumann boundary conditions; here the “weight” r is a real-valued function on Ω which is allowed to change sign in Ω or to be discontinuous. Such problems occur naturally in the study of many nonlinear elliptic equations. In an earlier work [Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 295 (1986), pp. 305–324], we have determined the leading term for the asymptotics of the eigenvalues λ of (P). In the present paper, we obtain, under more stringent assumptions, the corresponding remainder estimates. More precisely, let N ^±(λ) be the number of positive (respectively, negative) eigenvalues of (P) less than λ>0 (respectively, greater than λ<0); set r _± = max (±r, 0) and \(\Omega _ \pm = {\text{\{ }}x \in \Omega :r{\text{(}}x{\text{)}} \gtrless {\text{0\} }}\) . We show that $$N^ \pm {\text{(}}\lambda {\text{) = }}\mathop \smallint \limits_{\Omega _ \pm } {\text{(}}\lambda r{\text{(}}x{\text{))}}^{\frac{k}{{{\text{2}}m}}} {\text{ }}\mu \prime _\mathcal{A} {\text{(}}x{\text{) }}dx + 0{\text{(}}\left| \lambda \right|^{\frac{{k - 1}}{{{\text{2}}m}} + \delta } {\text{) as }}\lambda \to \pm \infty {\text{,}}$$ , where δ>0 and μ^′ _A (x) is the Browder-Gårding density associated with the principal part of A. How small δ can be chosen depends on the “regularity” of the leading coefficients of A, r _±, and of the boundary of Ω _±. These results seem to be new even for positive weights.     

An optical lens for focusing two pairs of points

We construct an optical lens in the (x, y)-plane which focuses two pairs of points, i.e., all the rays from a given point X _i are focused by the lens at a given point y _i , for i = 1, 2. The points X ₁, X ₂, Y ₁, Y ₂ lie on the x-axis and the lens has the form $$\left\{ {\gamma _{\text{1}} {\text{ }} + {\text{ }}f_{\text{1}} {\text{(}}y{\text{) }}\underline \leqslant {\text{ }}x{\text{ }}\underline \leqslant {\text{ }}\gamma _{\text{2}} {\text{ }} + {\text{ }}f_{\text{2}} {\text{(}}y{\text{)}},{\text{ }}\left| y \right|{\text{ }}\underline \leqslant {\text{ }}y_{\text{0}} } \right\}$$ where γ ₁, γ ₂ are given, and f _i (0) = 0, f _i (?y) = f _i (y). We then let X ₂ → X ₁, Y ₂ → Y ₁ and investigate the limiting lens. We show that this limit is generally not a symmetric lens, i.e., f ₁ + f ₂ ? 0.     

Asymptotic behavior of Toeplitz matrices and determinants

We consider the inverse X _N and determinant D_N(c) of an N×N Toeplitz matrix C_N=[c_i?j] ₀ ^N?1 as N ar∞. Under the condition that there exists a monotonic decreasing summable bound b _n ≧|c _n |+|c _?n |, and that the generating function \(c(\theta ) = \sum\limits_{n = - \infty }^\infty {c_n e^{i{\text{ }}n{\text{ }}\theta } }\) does not vanish, we construct a matrix iterative process which yields (i) explicit asymptotic formulae for the elements of X_N when v(c) = (2π)^?1 [arg{c(2π)}?arg{c(0)}] is zero. Thence we obtain (ii) expressions for the constants, and bounds on the remainder, in the asymptotic formula $$\ln D_N (c) = N{\text{ }}k_0 (c) + E_0 (c) + E_{1,N} (c) + \mathcal{R}_N (c),$$ and (iii) the extension of this formula to the case of general integral v(c). Under certain further conditions the monotonicity of E_1,N+?_N is proved. We discuss various identities for D_N which apply when c(θ) is a rational function of e^iθ and mention a conjecture for D _N when c(θ) has zeros, and is discontinuous with arbitrary v(c).     

Boundary conditions at the edge of a thin or thick plate bonded to an elastic support

At the clamped edge of a thin plate, the interior transverse deflection ω(x ₁, x₂) of the mid-plane x ₃=0 is required to satisfy the boundary conditions ω=?ω/?n=0. But suppose that the plate is not held fixed at the edge but is supported by being bonded to another elastic body; what now are the boundary conditions which should be applied to the interior solution in the plate? For the case in which the plate and its support are in two-dimensional plane strain, we show that the correct boundary conditions for ω must always have the form % MathType!MTEF!2!1!+-% feaafiart1ev1aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn% hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXafv3ySLgzGmvETj2BSbqef0uAJj3BZ9Mz0bYu% H52CGmvzYLMzaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqr1ngBPrgifHhDYfgasa% acOqpw0xe9v8qqaqFD0xXdHaVhbbf9v8qqaqFr0xc9pk0xbba9q8Wq% Ffea0-yr0RYxir-Jbba9q8aq0-yq-He9q8qqQ8frFve9Fve9Ff0dme% GabaqaaiGacaGaamqadaabaeaafiaakqaabeqaaiaabEhacaqGTaWa% aSaaaeaacaGG0aGaae4vamaaCaaaleqabaGaamOqaaaaaOqaaiaaco% dadaqadaqaaiaacgdacqGHsislcaqG2baacaGLOaGaayzkaaaaaiaa% bIgadaahaaWcbeqaaiaackdaaaGcdaWcaaqaaiaabsgadaahaaWcbe% qaaiaackdaaaGccaqG3baabaGaaeizaiaabIhafaqabeGabaaajaaq% baqcLbkacaGGYaaajaaybaqcLbkacaGGXaaaaaaakiabgUcaRmaala% aabaGaaiinaiaabEfadaahaaWcbeqaaiaadAeaaaaakeaacaGGZaWa% aeWaaeaacaGGXaGaeyOeI0IaaeODaaGaayjkaiaawMcaaaaacaqGOb% WaaWbaaSqabeaacaGGZaaaaOWaaSaaaeaacaqGKbWaaWbaaSqabeaa% caGGZaaaaOGaae4DaaqaaiaabsgacaqG4bqcaaubaeqabiqaaaqcaa% saaiaacodaaKaaafaajugGaiaacgdaaaaaaOGaeyypa0Jaaiimaiaa% cYcaaeaadaWcaaqaaiaabsgacaqG3baabaGaaeizaiaabIhaliaacg% daaaGccqGHsisldaWcaaqaaiaacsdacqqHyoqudaahaaWcbeqaaiaa% bkeaaaaakeaacaGGZaWaaeWaaeaacaGGXaGaeyOeI0IaaeODaaGaay% jkaiaawMcaaaaacaqGObWaaSaaaeaacaqGKbWaaWbaaSqabeaacaGG% YaaaaOGaae4DaaqaaiaabsgacaqG4bqbaeqabiqaaaqcaauaaKqzGc% GaaiOmaaqcaawaaKqzGcGaaiymaaaaaaGccqGHRaWkdaWcaaqaaiaa% csdacqqHyoqudaahaaWcbeqaaiaabAeaaaaakeaacaGGZaWaaeWaae% aacaGGXaGaeyOeI0IaaeODaaGaayjkaiaawMcaaaaacaqGObWaaWba% aSqabeaacaGGYaaaaOWaaSaaaeaacaqGKbWaaWbaaSqabeaacaGGZa% aaaOGaae4DaaqaaiaabsgacaqG4bqcaaubaeqabiqaaaqcaasaaiaa% codaaKaaafaajugGaiaacgdaaaaaaOGaeyypa0JaaiimaiaacYcaaa% aa!993A!\[\begin{gathered}{\text{w - }}\frac{{4{\text{W}}^B }}{{3\left( {1 - {\text{v}}} \right)}}{\text{h}}^2 \frac{{{\text{d}}^2 {\text{w}}}}{{{\text{dx}}\begin{array}{*{20}c}2 \\1 \\\end{array} }} + \frac{{4{\text{W}}^F }}{{3\left( {1 - {\text{v}}} \right)}}{\text{h}}^3 \frac{{{\text{d}}^3 {\text{w}}}}{{{\text{dx}}\begin{array}{*{20}c}3 \\1 \\\end{array} }} = 0, \hfill \\\frac{{{\text{dw}}}}{{{\text{dx}}1}} - \frac{{4\Theta ^{\text{B}} }}{{3\left( {1 - {\text{v}}} \right)}}{\text{h}}\frac{{{\text{d}}^2 {\text{w}}}}{{{\text{dx}}\begin{array}{*{20}c}2 \\1 \\\end{array} }} + \frac{{4\Theta ^{\text{F}} }}{{3\left( {1 - {\text{v}}} \right)}}{\text{h}}^2 \frac{{{\text{d}}^3 {\text{w}}}}{{{\text{dx}}\begin{array}{*{20}c}3 \\1 \\\end{array} }} = 0, \hfill \\\end{gathered}\]with exponentially small error as L/h→∞, where 2h is the plate thickness and L is the length scale of ω in the x ₁-direction. The four coefficients W ^B, W^F, Θ ^B , Θ ^F are computable constants which depend upon the geometry of the support and the elastic properties of the support and the plate, but are independent of the length of the plate and the loading applied to it. The leading terms in these boundary conditions as L/h→∞ (with all elastic moduli remaining fixed) are the same as those for a thin plate with a clamped edge. However by obtaining asymptotic formulae and general inequalities for Θ ^B , W ^F, we prove that these constants take large values when the support is ‘soft’ and so may still have a strong influence even when h/L is small. The coefficient W ^F is also shown to become large as the size of the support becomes large but this effect is unlikely to be significant except for very thick plates. When h/L is small, the first order corrected boundary conditions are w=0,% MathType!MTEF!2!1!+-% feaafiart1ev1aaatCvAUfeBSjuyZL2yd9gzLbvyNv2CaerbuLwBLn% hiov2DGi1BTfMBaeXafv3ySLgzGmvETj2BSbqef0uAJj3BZ9Mz0bYu% H52CGmvzYLMzaerbd9wDYLwzYbItLDharqqr1ngBPrgifHhDYfgasa% acOqpw0xe9v8qqaqFD0xXdHaVhbbf9v8qqaqFr0xc9pk0xbba9q8Wq% Ffea0-yr0RYxir-Jbba9q8aq0-yq-He9q8qqQ8frFve9Fve9Ff0dme% GabaqaaiGacaGaamqadaabaeaafiaakeaadaWcaaqaaiaabsgacaqG% 3baabaGaaeizaiaabIhaliaacgdaaaGccqGHsisldaWcaaqaaiaacs% dacqqHyoqudaahaaWcbeqaaiaabkeaaaaakeaacaGGZaWaaeWaaeaa% caGGXaGaeyOeI0IaaeODaaGaayjkaiaawMcaaaaacaqGObWaaSaaae% aacaqGKbWaaWbaaSqabeaacaGGYaaaaOGaae4DaaqaaiaabsgacaqG% 4bqbaeqabiqaaaqcaauaaKqzGcGaaiOmaaqcaawaaKqzGcGaaiymaa% aaaaGccqGH9aqpcaGGWaGaaiilaaaa!5DD4!\[\frac{{{\text{dw}}}}{{{\text{dx}}1}} - \frac{{4\Theta ^{\text{B}} }}{{3\left( {1 - {\text{v}}} \right)}}{\text{h}}\frac{{{\text{d}}^2 {\text{w}}}}{{{\text{dx}}\begin{array}{*{20}c}2 \\1 \\\end{array} }} = 0,\]which correspond to a hinged edge with a restoring couple proportional to the angular deflection of the plate at the edge.     

Detecting very low levels of long-chain branching in metallocene-catalyzed polyethylenes

The detection of long-chain branches (LCBs) is an issue of significant importance in both basic research and industrial applications, as LCBs provide excellent means to improve the processing behavior, especially in elongation-dominated processing operations. In this article, different methods for the detection of very low amounts of LCBs in metallocene-catalyzed polyethylene are presented and compared with respect to their sensitivity. Depending on the molar mass, the zero shear rate viscosity increase factor η ₀/ $\eta_{0}^{\rm lin}$ , the steady-state elastic recovery compliance $J_{e}^{0}$ , the complex modulus functions G′(ω) and G″(ω), and the thermorheological complexity were found to be sensitive. In general, the higher the molar mass, the more important the transient quantities become and the easier finding the long-chain branches gets. Although rheology is very sensitive, rheological methods in combination with size exclusion chromatography proved to be the most sensitive combination to detect even very low amounts of LCBs. Especially methods involving the elastic properties (G′(ω), $J_{\rm e}^{0}$ , and J _r(t)) react very sensitively, but these are also very distinctly influenced by the molar mass distribution.     

Asymptotic analysis of linearly elastic shells. III. Justification of Koiter's shell equations

We consider as in Parts I and II a family of linearly elastic shells of thickness 2?, all having the same middle surfaceS=?(?)?R ³, whereω?R ² is a bounded and connected open set with a Lipschitz-continuous boundary, and? ∈ ?³ (?;R ³). The shells are clamped on a portion of their lateral face, whose middle line is?(γ ₀), whereγ ₀ is a portion of?ω withlength γ ₀>0. For all?>0, let $\zeta _i^\varepsilon$ denote the covariant components of the displacement $u_i^\varepsilon g^{i,\varepsilon }$ of the points of the shell, obtained by solving the three-dimensional problem; let $\zeta _i^\varepsilon$ denote the covariant components of the displacement $\zeta _i^\varepsilon$ a ⁱ of the points of the middle surfaceS, obtained by solving the two-dimensional model ofW.T. Koiter, which consists in finding $$\zeta ^\varepsilon = \left( {\zeta _i^\varepsilon } \right) \in V_K (\omega ) = \left\{ {\eta = (\eta _\iota ) \in {\rm H}^1 (\omega ) \times H^1 (\omega ) \times H^2 (\omega ); \eta _i = \partial _v \eta _3 = 0 on \gamma _0 } \right\}$$ such that $$\begin{gathered} \varepsilon \mathop \smallint \limits_\omega a^{\alpha \beta \sigma \tau } \gamma _{\sigma \tau } (\zeta ^\varepsilon )\gamma _{\alpha \beta } (\eta )\sqrt a dy + \frac{{\varepsilon ^3 }}{3} \mathop \smallint \limits_\omega a^{\alpha \beta \sigma \tau } \rho _{\sigma \tau } (\zeta ^\varepsilon )\rho _{\alpha \beta } (\eta )\sqrt a dy \hfill \\ = \mathop \smallint \limits_\omega p^{i,\varepsilon } \eta _i \sqrt a dy for all \eta = (\eta _i ) \in V_K (\omega ), \hfill \\ \end{gathered}$$ where $a^{\alpha \beta \sigma \tau }$ are the components of the two-dimensional elasticity tensor ofS, $\gamma _{\alpha \beta }$ (η) and $\rho _{\alpha \beta }$ (η) are the components of the linearized change of metric and change of curvature tensors ofS, and $p^{i,\varepsilon }$ are the components of the resultant of the applied forces. Under the same assumptions as in Part I, we show that the fields $\frac{1}{{2_\varepsilon }}\smallint _{ - \varepsilon }^\varepsilon u_i^\varepsilon g^{i,\varepsilon } dx_3^\varepsilon$ and $\zeta _i^\varepsilon$ a ⁱ , both defined on the surfaceS, have the same principal part as? → 0, inH ¹ (ω) for the tangential components, and inL ²(ω) for the normal component; under the same assumptions as in Part II, we show that the same fields again have the same principal part as? → 0, inH ¹ (ω) for all their components. For “membrane” and “flexural” shells, the two-dimensional model ofW.T. Koiter is therefore justified.     

Generalization of Kramers-Kronig transforms and some approximations of relations between viscoelastic quantities

On the basis of some very plausible assumptions about the response of physical systems to stimuli, such as Boltzmann's superposition principle and the causality principle, Spence showed that the following characteristics obtain for the modulus and compliance functions: (i) They are analytic in the lower half of the complex frequency plane, (ii) they are limited if the frequency tends to infinity, and (iii) the real and imaginary parts are even and odd functions, respectively, of the frequencyω. It can generally be demonstrated that the real and imaginary parts of every function satisfying these three requirements and (iv) without singularities on the real frequency axis, are interrelated by Kramers-Kronig transforms. Similar relations hold between the logarithm of the modulus and the argument of the function. Under certain conditions the Kramers-Kronig relations may be approximated by rather simple equations. For linear viscoelastic materials, for instance, the following approximate relations were obtained for the components of the complex dynamic shear modulus,G ^* (iω) = G′(ω) + iG″(ω) = G _d (ω) expiδ(ω): $$\begin{gathered} G'' (\omega ) \simeq \frac{\pi }{2}\left( {\frac{{dG'(u)}}{{d In u}}} \right)_{u = \omega } , \hfill \\ G' (\omega ) - G'(o) \simeq - \frac{{\omega \pi }}{2}\left( {\frac{{d[G''(u)/u]}}{{d In u}}} \right)_{u = \omega } , \hfill \\ \delta (\omega ) \simeq \frac{\pi }{2}\left( {\frac{{d In G_d (u)}}{{d In u}}} \right)_{u = \omega } . \hfill \\ \end{gathered} $$ The first of these relations was published long ago by Staverman and Schwarzl and is useful over broad frequency ranges, as is the second relation. The last equation is the most general one, and also is better supported by experiment.     

On the logarithmic-law constants and the turbulent boundary layer at low Reynolds numbers

It is shown that a family of formally derived similarity solutions describe to leading order the outer region of a turbulent boundary layer for all Reynolds numbers for which the layer satisfies the logarithmic law-of-the-wall. The family includes Coles' [1] hypothesis. For consistency with this hypothesis and the logarithmic law-of-the-wall, it is further shown that the constants in the latter form the product κC=2+O(ε), suggesting the logarithmic law of the wall be written $${U \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {U {U_\tau = \kappa ^{ - 1} }}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {U_\tau = \kappa ^{ - 1} }}\ln \left( {e^2 U_\tau {y \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {y \nu }} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} \nu }} \right) + O\left( \in \right).$$ A range of data are reprocessed to determine the skin friction coefficientC _f using κC = 2 and these collapse well when plotted against momentum thickness Reynolds number, Re _θ . It is also shown that the form parameter, Π, in Coles hypothesis is not unique but is determined by history effects peculiar to the boundary layer. Expressions are derived forC _f (Re _θ ) and the shape factorH (Re _θ ); both agree closely with the data and are valid over all Reynolds numbers for which the logarithmic law of the wall is satisfied.     

On the stability or instability of the singular solution of the semilinear heat equation with exponential reaction term

We study questions of existence, uniqueness and asymptotic behaviour for the solutions of u(x, t) of the problem $$\begin{gathered} {\text{ }}u_t - \Delta u = \lambda e^u ,{\text{ }}\lambda {\text{ > 0, }}t > 0,{\text{ }}x{\text{ }}\varepsilon B, \hfill \\ (P){\text{ }}u(x,0) = u_0 (x),{\text{ }}x{\text{ }}\varepsilon B, \hfill \\ {\text{ }}u(x,t) = 0{\text{ }}on{\text{ }}\partial B \times (0,\infty ), \hfill \\ \end{gathered} $$ where B is the unit ball $\{ x\varepsilon R^N :|x|{\text{ }} \leqq {\text{ }}1\} {\text{ and }}N \geqq 3$ . Our interest is focused on the parameter λ ₀=2(N?2) for which (P) admits a singular stationary solution of the form $$S(x) = - 2log|x|$$ . We study the dynamical stability or instability of S, which depends on the dimension. In particular, there exists a minimal bounded stationary solution u which is stable if $3 \leqq N \leqq 9$ , while S is unstable. For $N \geqq 10$ there is no bounded minimal solution and S is an attractor from below but not from above. In fact, solutions larger than S cannot exist in any time interval (there is instantaneous blow-up), and this happens for all dimensions.     

Modified dissipativity for a non-linear evolution equation arising in turbulence

We are concerned with the regularity properties for all times of the equation $$\frac{{\partial U}}{{\partial t}}\left( {t,x} \right) = - \frac{{\partial ^2 }}{{\partial x^2 }}\left[ {U\left( {t,{\text{0}}} \right) - U\left( {t,x} \right)} \right]^2 - v\left( { - \frac{{\partial ^2 }}{{\partial x^2 }}} \right)^\alpha U\left( {t,x} \right)$$ which arises, with α=1, in the theory of turbulence. Here U(t,·) is of positive type and the dissipativity α is a non-negative real number. It is shown that for arbitrary ν≧0 and ?>0, there exists a global solution in \(L^\infty [0,\infty ;H^{\tfrac{3}{2} - \varepsilon } (\mathbb{R})]\) . If ν>0 and \(\alpha > \alpha _{cr} = \tfrac{1}{2}\) , smoothness of initial data persists indefinitely. If 0≦α<α _cr, there exist positive constants ν₁(α) and ν₂(α), depending on the data, such that global regularity persists for ν>ν₁(α), whereas, for 0≦ν<ν₂(α), the second spatial derivative at the origin blows up after a finite time. It is conjectured that with a suitable choice of α _cr, similar results hold for the Navier-Stokes equation.     

Dynamic-fracture toughness of A533B steel

Methods of evaluating instrumented Charpy-impact tests have been described and applied to the determination of the dynamic-fracture toughness,K _1d, of A533B steel. Measurements were made over a range of temperature (?197°C to+100° C) and at loading rates, \(\dot K{\mathbf{ }} \simeq {\mathbf{ }}10^{6{\mathbf{ }}} ksi{\mathbf{ }}\sqrt i /s{\mathbf{ }}(1.1{\mathbf{ }}x{\mathbf{ }}10^{6{\mathbf{ }}} MN/m^{3/2} /s)\) . The results have been compared to those obtained by other workers from slower tests on much thicker specimens. The work leads to a conclusion as to the extent to which higher strain-rate testing can replace specimen size in obtaining ASTM valid results.