Structure and Photochemical Properties of r‐1, c‐2, t‐3, t‐4‐l, 3‐Bis [2‐ (5‐R‐benzoxazolyl) ] −2,4‐di (4‐R' ‐phenyl) cyclobutane

r‐1, c‐2, t‐3, t‐4‐1,3‐Bis[2‐(5‐R‐benzoxazolyl)]‐2,4‐di(4‐R'‐phenyl)cyclobutane (IIa: R=R' = H; IIb: R=Me, R'= H; IIc: R = Me, R' = OMe) was synthesized with high stereo‐selectivity by the photodimerization of trans‐l‐[2‐(5‐R‐benzoxazolyl)]‐2‐(4‐R'‐phenyl) ethene (Ia: R=R' = H; Ib: R = Me, R' = H; Ic: R = Me, R' = OMe) in sulfuric acid. The structures of IIa–IIc were identified by elemental analysis, IR, UV, ¹H NMR, ¹³C NMR and MS. The molecular and crystal structure of IIc has been determined by X‐ray diffraction method. The crystal of IIc (C₃₄H₃₀N₂O₄. 0.5C₂OH) is monoclinic, space group P2₁/n with cell dimensions of a = 1.5416(3), b =0.5625(1), c = 1.7875(4) nm, β = 91.56 (3)°, V= 1.550(1) nm³, Z = 2. The structure shows that the molecule of IIc is centrosymmetric, which indicates that the dimerization process is a head‐to‐tail fashion. The selectivity of the photodimerization of Ia–Ic has been enhanced by using acidic solvent and the reaction speed would be decreased when electron donating group was introduced in the 4‐position of the phenyl group. That the photodimerization is not affected by the presence of oxygen as well as its high stereo‐selectivity demonstrated that the reaction proceeded through an excited singlet state. It was also found that under irradiation of short wavelength UV, these dimers underwent photolysis completely to reproduce its trans‐monomers, and then the new formed species changed into their cis‐isomers through trans‐cis isomerization.     

Bifunktionalisierte 1 H‐Phosphiren‐ und g1‐1‐Phosphaallen‐Wolframkomplexe

Bifunctionalized 1 H‐Phosphirene and g¹‐1‐Phosphaallene Tungsten Complexes The tungsten(0) complex [{(Me₃Si)₂HCPC(Ph)=N}W(CO)₅] 1 reacts upon heating with acetylene derivatives 2 a–d in toluene to form benzonitrile and the complexes [{(Me₃Si)₂HCPC(R)=COEt} · W(CO)₅] 5 a–d ( 5 a : R = SiMe₃; 5 b : R = SiPh₃; 5 c : R = SnMe₃; 5 d : R = SnPh₃) and [{(Me₃Si)₂HCP=C=C(OEt)R} · W(CO)₅] 6 a, b ( 6 a : R = SnMe₃; 6 b : R = SnPh₃), which have been isolated by chromatography; complexes 5 c and 6 a have been characterized as mixtures. Spectroscopic and mass spectrometric data are discussed. The crystal structure of the compound 5 a was determined by X‐ray single crystal structure analysis ( 5 a : space group P2₁/n, Z = 4, a = 977.6(2) pm, b = 1814.6(4) pm, c = 1628.0(4) pm, β = 93.95(2)°).     

Thermolysis of hexasubstituted‐4,5‐dihydro‐3H‐pyrazoles: Kinetics and activation parameters

A kinetics study of the thermolysis of a series of hexasubstituted‐4,5‐dihydro‐3H‐pyrazoles (pyrazolines 1a: 3,3,4,4‐tetramethyl‐5‐phenyl‐5‐acetoxy; 1b: cis‐3,5‐diphenyl‐3,3,4‐trimethyl‐5‐acetoxy; 1c: cis‐3,5‐diphenyl‐3,4,4‐trimethyl‐5‐methoxy; 1d: 3,3,5‐triphenyl‐4,4‐dimethyl‐5‐acetoxy), which produced the corresponding hexasubstituted cyclopropanes 2a–d in quantitative yields was carried out. The first order rate constants (k₁) for thermal decomposition and activation parameters were determined. The relative reactivity series was found to be 1d >> 1b ∼ 1c > 1a. The activation parameters for thermolysis were found to be: for 1a ΔH‡ = 39.8 kcal/mol, ΔS‡ = 14 eu, k_150° = 6.8 × 10⁻⁵ s⁻¹; for 1b ΔH‡ = 33.5 kcal/mol, ΔS ‡ = 0.2 eu, k_150° = 1.7 × 10⁻⁴s⁻¹; for 1c ΔH‡ = 32.7 kcal/mol, ΔS‡ = −1.8 eu, k_150° = 1.2 × 10⁻⁴s⁻¹; for 1d ΔH‡ = 30.1 kcal/mol, ΔS‡ = −1.6 eu, k_150° = 8.8 × 10⁻³s⁻¹. The effect of variation of C3 substituents on the activation parameters for thermolysis paralleled the trend reported for acyclic analogs. The results are consistent with the formation of a (singlet) 1,3‐diradical intermediate with subsequent closure to yield the cyclopropanes. The mechanism of diradical formation appears to involve N₂‐C₃ bond cleavage as the rate determining step rather than simultaneous two bond scission. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Heteroatom Chem 11:299–302, 2000     

Synthesis of 1‐silacyclopent‐2‐ene derivatives using 1,2‐hydroboration, 1,1‐organoboration and protodeborylation

The reaction of di(alkyn‐1‐yl)vinylsilanes R¹(H₂C═CH)Si(C≡C―R)₂ (R¹ = Me ( 1 ), Ph ( 2 ); R = Bu (a), Ph (b), Me₂HSi (c)) at 25°C with 1 equiv. of 9‐borabicyclo[3.3.1]nonane (9‐BBN) affords 1‐silacyclopent‐2‐ene derivatives ( 3a , 3b , 3c , 4a , 4b ), bearing one Si―C≡C―R function readily available for further transformations. These compounds are formed by consecutive 1,2‐hydroboration followed by intramolecular 1,1‐carboboration. Treated with a further equivalent of 9‐BBN in benzene they are converted at relatively high temperature (80–100°C) into 1‐alkenyl‐1‐silacyclopent‐2‐ene derivatives ( 5a , 5b 6a , 6b ) as a result of 1,2‐hydroboration of the Si―C≡C―R function. Protodeborylation of the 9‐BBN‐substituted 1‐silacyclopent‐2‐ene derivatives 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , using acetic acid in excess, proceeds smoothly to give the novel 1‐silacyclopent‐2‐ene ( 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 ). The solution‐state structural assignment of all new compounds, i.e. di(alkyn‐1‐yl)vinylsilanes and 1‐silacyclopent‐2‐ene derivatives, was carried out using multinuclear magnetic resonance techniques (¹H, ¹³C, ¹¹B, ²⁹Si NMR). The gas phase structures of some examples were calculated and optimized by density functional theory methods (B3LYP/6‐311+G/(d,p) level of theory), and ²⁹Si NMR parameters were calculated (chemical shifts δ²⁹Si and coupling constants ⁿJ(²⁹Si,¹³C)). Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Reaktionen von Lithiumhydridosilylamiden RR′(H)Si–N(Li)R″ mit Chlortrimethylsilan in Tetrahydrofuran und unpolaren Lösungsmitteln: N‐Silylierung und/oder Cyclodisilazanbildung

Reactions of Lithium Hydridosilylamides RR′(H)Si–N(Li)R″ with Chlorotrimethylsilane in Tetrahydrofuran and Nonpolar Solvents: N‐Silylation and/or Formation of Cyclodisilazanes The lithiumhydridosilylamides RR′(H)Si–N(Li)R″ ( 2 a : R = R′ = CHMe₂, R″ = SiMe₃; 2 b : R = R′ = Ph, R″ = SiMe₃; 2 c : R = R′ = CMe₃, R″ = SiMe₃; 2 d : R = R′ = R″ = CMe₃; 2 e : R = Me, R′ = Si(SiMe₃)₃, R″ = CMe₃; 2 f – 2 h : R = R′ = Me, f : R″ = 2,4,6‐Me₃C₆H₂, g : R″ = SiH(CHMe₂)₂, h : R″ = SiH(CMe₃)₂; 2 i : R = R′ = CMe₃, R″ = SiH(CMe₃)₂) were prepared by reaction of the corresponding hydridosilylamines RR′(H)Si–NHR″ 2 a – 2 i with n‐butyllithium in equimolar ratio in n‐hexane. The unknown amines 1 e – 1 i and amides 2 f – 2 i have been characterized spectroscopically. The wave numbers of the Si–H stretching vibrations and ²⁹Si–¹H coupling constants of the amides are less than of the analogous amines. This indicates a higher hydride character for the hydrogen atom of the Si–H group in the amide in comparison to the amines. The ²⁹Si‐NMR chemical shifts lie in the amides at higher field than in the amines. The amides 2 a – 2 c and 2 e – 2 g react with chlorotrimethylsilane in THF to give the corresponding N‐silylation products RR′(H)Si–N(SiMe₃)R″ ( 3 a – 3 c , 3 e – 3 g ) in good yields. In the reaction of 2 i with chlorotrimethylsilane in molar ratio 1 : 2,33 in THF hydrogen‐chlorine exchange takes place and after hydrolytic work up of the reaction mixture [(Me₃C)₂(Cl)Si]₂NH ( 5 a ) is obtained. The reaction of the amides 2 a – 2 c , 2 f and 2 g with chlorotrimethylsilane in m(p)‐xylene and/or n‐hexane affords mixtures of N‐substitution products RR′(H)Si–N(SiMe₃)R″ ( 3 a – 3 c , 3 f , 3 g ) and cyclodisilazanes [RR′Si–NR″]₂ ( 6 a – 6 c , 6 f , 6 g ) as the main products. In case of the reaction of 2 h the cyclodisilazane 6 h was obtained only. 2 c – 2 e show a very low reactivity toward chlorotrimetyhlsilane in m‐xylene and toluene resp.. In contrast to Me₃SiCl the reactivity of 2 d toward Me₃SiOSO₂CF₃ and Me₂(H)SiCl is significant higher. 2 d react with Me₃SiOSO₂CF₃ and Me₂(H)SiCl in n‐hexane under N‐silylation to give RR′(H)Si–N(SiMe₃)R″ ( 3 d ) and RR′(H)Si–N(SiHMe₂)R″ ( 3 d ′) resp. The crystal structures of [Me₂Si–NSiMe₃]₂ ( I ) ( 6 f , 6 g and 6 h ) have been determined.     

Complexation of Alkali Triflates by Crown Ethers: Synthesis and Crystal Structure of [Na(12‐crown‐4)2][SO3CF3], [Na(15‐crown‐5)][SO3CF3], [Rb(18‐crown‐6)][SO3CF3], and [Cs(18‐crown‐6)][SO3CF3]

Complexes of trifluoromethanesulfonates (triflates) with alkali metals Na, Rb, Cs have been prepared in the presence of various macrocyclic polyether crowns [(12‐crown‐4), (15‐crown‐5) and (18‐crown‐6)]. Depending on the combination of alkali ion with crown, the complexes include separated ion pairs [Na(12‐crown‐4)₂] [SO₃CF₃] ( 1 ) and contact ion pairs [Na(15‐crown‐5)] [SO₃CF₃] ( 2 ), [Rb(18‐crown‐6)] [SO₃CF₃] ( 3 ), and [Cs(18‐crown‐6)] [SO₃CF₃] ( 4 ), in which the triflate acts as a bidentate ligand. It is shown that the choice of crown ether is of paramount importance in determining the solid‐state structural outcome. The complex resulting from the pairing of crown ether ( 1 ) develops, when the crown ether is too small in relation to the alkali ion radius. When the cavity size of the crown ether is matched with the alkali ion radius, simple monomeric structures are identified in 2 , 3 and 4 . The title compounds crystallize in the monoclinic crystal system: 1 : space group P2/c with a = 9.942(3), b = 11.014(2), c = 10.801(3) Å, β = 97.30(2)°, V = 1173.1(4) ų, Z = 2, R1 = 0.0812, wR2 = 0.1133: 2 : space group P2₁/m with a = 7.949(2), b = 12.063(3), c = 9.094(2) Å, β = 105.98(2)°, V = 838.3(4) ų, Z = 2, R1 = 0.0869, wR2 = 0.1035: 3 : space group P2₁/c with a = 12.847(5), b = 8.448(2), c = 22.272(6) Å, β = 122.90(3)°, V = 2029.5(1) ų, Z = 4, R1 = 0.0684, wR2 = 0.1044: 4 : space group P2₁/n with a = 12.871(3), b = 8.359(1), c = 19.019(4) Å, β = 92.61(2)°, V = 2044.2(6) ų, Z = 4, R1 = 0.0621, wR2 = 0.0979.     

Synthesis and characterization of the new ambidentate O‐cholesteryl‐O‐phenyl phosphorothioate ligand and its organoarsenic derivatives of phenoxarsin‐10‐yl and phenothiarsin‐10‐yl phosphorothioate

A new anionic phosphorothioate ligand that incorporates the bioactive cholesteryl group was obtained ( 2 ), Na(RR′P(S)O; R, O‐phenyl; R′, O‐cholesteryl) from the phenylphosphoramidate ( 1 ) and NaH in dioxane. In order to test the coordination ability of 2, two organoarsenic derivatives were prepared, O(C₆H₄)₂AsS(O)PRR′ ( 3 ) and S(C₆H₄)₂AsS(O)PRR′ ( 4 ) by reacting 2 with 10‐chlorophenoxarsine or 10‐chlorophenothiarsine. Compounds 2, 3 , and 4 were characterized by elemental microanalysis, IR, multi‐element NMR (¹H, ¹³C, and ³¹P), and mass spectrometry. The spectroscopic data suggest that the ligand is bonded to the arsenic only through the sulfur donor atom in both organoarsenic derivatives. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Heteroatom Chem 11:6–10, 2000     

Tris[3‐hydroxy‐2(1 H)‐pyridinonato]‐Komplexe von Al3+, Cr3+ und Fe3+ – Kristall‐ und Molekülstrukturen von 3‐Hydroxy‐2(1 H)‐pyridinon und Tris[3‐hydroxy‐2(1 H)‐pyridinonato]chrom(III)

Tris[3‐hydroxy‐2(1 H)‐pyridinonato] Complexes of Al³⁺, Cr³⁺, and Fe³⁺ – Crystal and Molecular Structures of 3‐Hydroxy‐2(1 H)‐pyridinone and Tris[3‐hydroxy‐2(1 H)‐pyridinonato]chromium(III) Tris[3‐hydroxy‐2(1 H)‐pyridinonato] complexes of Al³⁺, Cr³⁺ and Fe³⁺ are obtained by reactions of 3‐hydroxy‐2(1 H)pyridinone with the hydrates of AlCl₃, CrCl₃ or Fe(NO₃) in aqueous alkaline solutions as polycrystalline precipitates. The compounds are isotypic. X‐ray structure determinations were performed on single crystals of the uncoordinated 3‐hydroxy‐2(1 H)‐pyridinone ( 1 ) (orthorhombic, space group P2₁2₁2₁, a = 405.4(1), b = 683.0(1), c = 1770.3(3) pm, Z = 4) and of the chromium compound 3 (rhombohedral with hexagonal setting, space group R3c, a = 978.1(1), c = 2954.0(1) pm, Z = 6).     

η4‐HBCC‐σ,π‐Borataallyl Complexes of Ruthenium Comprising an Agostic Interaction

Thermolysis of [Cp*Ru(PPh₂(CH₂)PPh₂)BH₂(L₂)] 1 (Cp*=η⁵‐C₅Me₅; L=C₇H₄NS₂), with terminal alkynes led to the formation of η⁴‐σ,π‐borataallyl complexes [Cp*Ru(μ‐H)B{R‐C=CH₂}(L)₂] ( 2 a – c ) and η²‐vinylborane complexes [Cp*Ru(R‐C=CH₂)BH(L)₂] ( 3 a – c ) ( 2 a , 3 a : R=Ph; 2 b , 3 b : R=COOCH₃; 2 c , 3 c : R=p‐CH₃‐C₆H₄; L=C₇H₄NS₂) through hydroboration reaction. Ruthenium and the HBCC unit of the vinylborane moiety in 2 a – c are linked by a unique η⁴‐interaction. Conversions of 1 into 3 a – c proceed through the formation of intermediates 2 a – c . Furthermore, in an attempt to expand the library of these novel complexes, chemistry of σ‐borane complex [Cp*RuCO(μ‐H)BH₂L] 4 (L=C₇H₄NS₂) was investigated with both internal and terminal alkynes. Interestingly, under photolytic conditions, 4 reacts with methyl propiolate to generate the η⁴‐σ,π‐borataallyl complexes [Cp*Ru(μ‐H)BH{R‐C=CH₂}(L)] 5 and [Cp*Ru(μ‐H)BH{HC=CH‐R}(L)] 6 (R=COOCH₃; L=C₇H₄NS₂) by Markovnikov and anti‐Markovnikov hydroboration. In an extension, photolysis of 4 in the presence of dimethyl acetylenedicarboxylate yielded η⁴‐σ,π‐borataallyl complex [Cp*Ru(μ‐H)BH{R‐C=CH‐R}(L)] 7 (R=COOCH₃; L=C₇H₄NS₂). An agostic interaction was also found to be present in 2 a – c and 5 – 7 , which is rare among the borataallyl complexes. All the new compounds have been characterized in solution by IR, ¹H, ¹¹B, ¹³C NMR spectroscopy, mass spectrometry and the structural types were unequivocally established by crystallographic analysis of 2 b , 3 a – c and 5 – 7 . DFT calculations were performed to evaluate possible bonding and electronic structures of the new compounds.     

Water Soluble Gold(I)‐diacetyl‐1,3,5‐triaza‐7‐phosphaadamantane‐arylazoimidazole Complexes: Synthesis and Spectroscopic Study

Reaction of [Au(DAPTA)(Cl)] with RaaiR’ in CH2Cl2 medium following ligand addition leads to [Au(DAPTA)(RaaiR’)](Cl) [DAPTA＝diacetyl-1,3,5-triaza-7-phosphaadamantane, RaaiR’＝p-R-C6H4-N＝N- C3H2-NN-1-R’, (1—3), abbreviated as N,N’-chelator, where N(imidazole) and N(azo) represent N and N’, respectively; R＝H (a), Me (b), Cl (c) and R’＝Me (1), CH2CH3 (2), CH2Ph (3)]. The 1H NMR spectral measurements in D2O suggest methylene, CH2, in RaaiEt gives a complex AB type multiplet while in RaaiCH2Ph it shows AB type quartets. 13C NMR spectrum in D2O suggest the molecular skeleton. The 1H-1H COSY spectrum in D2O as well as contour peaks in the 1H-13C HMQC spectrum in D2O assign the solution structure.     

N,O‐chelate aluminum and zinc complexes: synthesis and catalysis in the ring‐opening polymerization of ε‐caprolactone

Reaction between 2‐(1H‐pyrrol‐1‐yl)benzenamine and 2‐hydroxybenzaldehyde or 3,5‐di‐tert‐butyl‐2‐hydroxybenzaldehyde afforded 2‐(4,5‐dihydropyrrolo[1,2‐a]quinoxalin‐4‐yl)phenol (HOL¹NH, 1a) or 2,4‐di‐tert‐butyl‐6‐(4,5‐dihydropyrrolo[1,2‐a]quinoxalin‐4‐yl)phenol (HOL²NH, 1b). Both 1a and 1b can be converted to 2‐(H‐pyrrolo[1,2‐a]quinoxalin‐4‐yl)phenol (HOL³N, 2a) and 2,4‐di‐tert‐butyl‐6‐(H‐pyrrolo[1,2‐a]quinoxalin‐4‐yl)phenol (HOL⁴N, 2b), respectively, by heating 1a and 1b in toluene. Treatment of 1b with an equivalent of AlEt₃ afforded [Al(Et₂)(OL²NH)] (3). Reaction of 1b with two equivalents of AlR₃ (R = Me, Et) gave dinuclear aluminum complexes [(AlR₂)₂(OL²N)] (R = Me, 4a; R = Et, 4b). Refluxing the toluene solution of 4a and 4b, respectively, generated [Al(R₂)(OL⁴N)] (R = Me, 5a; R = Et, 5b). Complexes 5a and 5b were also obtained either by refluxing a mixture of 1b and two equivalents of AlR₃ (R = Me, Et) in toluene or by treatment of 2b with an equivalent of AlR₃ (R = Me, Et). Reaction of 2a with an equivalent of AlMe₃ afforded [Al(Me₂)(OL³N)] (5c). Treatment of 1b with an equivalent of ZnEt₂ at room temperature gave [Zn(Et)(OL²NH)] (6), while reaction of 1b with 0.5 equivalent of ZnEt₂ at 40 °C afforded [Zn(OL²NH)₂] (7). Reaction of 1b with two equivalents of ZnEt₂ from room temperature to 60 °C yielded [Zn(Et)(OL⁴N)] (8). Compound 8 was also obtained either by reaction between 6 and an equivalent of ZnEt₂ from room temperature to 60 °C or by treatment of 2b with an equivalent of ZnEt₂ at room temperature. Reaction of 2b with 0.5 equivalent of ZnEt₂ at room temperature gave [Zn(OL⁴N)₂] (9), which was also formed by heating the toluene solution of 6. All novel compounds were characterized by NMR spectroscopy and elemental analyses. The structures of complexes 3, 5c and 6 were additionally characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction techniques. The catalysis of complexes 3, 4a, 5a–c, 6 and 8 toward the ring‐opening polymerization of ε‐caprolactone was evaluated. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Syntheses,and Crystal Structures of Indium Complexes with η2‐Piperidinyldithiocarbamate and η2‐Pyridine‐2‐Thionate Containing Ligands: Structures of [In(η2‐S2CNC5H10)3] and [In(η2‐pyS)3]

The η²‐thio‐indium complexes [In(η²‐thio)₃] (thio = S₂CNC₅H₁₀, 2 ; SNC₄H₄, (pyridine‐2‐thionate, pyS, 3 ) and [In(η²‐pyS)₂(η²‐acac)], 4 , (acac: acetylacetonate) are prepared by reacting the tris(η²‐acac)indium complex [In(η²‐acac)₃], 1 with HS₂CNC₅H₁₀, pySH, and pySH with ratios of 1:3, 1:3, and 1:2 in dichloromethane at room temperature, respectively. All of these complexes are identified by spectroscopic methods and complexes 2 and 3 are determined by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. Crystal data for 2 : space group, C2/c with a = 13.5489(8) Å, b = 12.1821(7) Å, c = 16.0893(10) Å, β = 101.654(1)°, V = 2600.9(3) ų, and Z = 4. The structure was refined to R = 0.033 and Rw = 0.086; Crystal data for 3 : space group, P2₁ with a = 8.8064 (6) Å, b = 11.7047 (8) Å, c = 9.4046 (7) Å, β = 114.78 (1)°, V = 880.13(11) ų, and Z = 2. The structure was refined to R = 0.030 and Rw = 0.061. The geometry around the metal atom of the two complexes is a trigonal prismatic coordination. The piperidinyldithiocarbamate and pyridine‐2‐thionate ligands, respectively, coordinate to the indium metal center through the two sulfur atoms and one sulfur and one nitrogen atoms, respectively. The short C‐N bond length in the range of 1.322(4)–1.381(6) Å in 2 and C‐S bond length in the range of 1.715(2)–1.753(6) Å in 2 and 3 , respectively, indicate considerable partial double bond character.     

Synthesis of highly branched polyethylene using para‐phenyl‐substituted α‐diimine nickel catalysts

A series of para‐phenyl‐substituted α‐diimine nickel complexes, [(2,6‐R₂‐4‐PhC₆H₂N═C(Me))₂]NiBr₂ (R = ⁱPr ( 1 ); R = Et ( 2 ); R = Me ( 3 ); R = H ( 4 )), were synthesized and characterized. These complexes with systematically varied ligand sterics were used as precatalysts for ethylene polymerization in combination with methylaluminoxane. The results indicated the possibility of catalytic activity, molecular weight and polymer microstructure control through catalyst structures and polymerization temperature. Interestingly, it is possible to tune the catalytic activities ((0.30–2.56) × 10⁶ g (mol Ni·h)^?1), polymer molecular weights (M_n = (2.1–28.6) × 10⁴ g mol^?1) and branching densities (71–143/1000 C) over a very wide range. The polyethylene branching densities decreased with increasing bulkiness of ligand and decreasing polymerization temperature. Specifically, methyl‐substituted complex 3 showed high activities and produced highly branched amorphous polyethylene (up to 143 branches per 1000 C).     

The Structure of Bis[N‐6‐aminopyridyl‐N‐(1S)‐(+)‐10‐camphorsulfonylamino]palladium in the Solid State and in Solution

The complex, bis[N‐6‐aminopyridyl‐N‐(1S)‐(+)‐10‐camphorsulfonylamino]palladium, Pd[(S)‐APCS]₂, 1 , was prepared by reaction of 2‐[(1S)‐(+)‐10‐camphorsulfonamino]‐6‐aminopyridine with PdCl₂ in THF. Complex 1 has been characterized by spectroscopic methods and its structure has been determined by X‐ray crystallography. Crystal data: space group C2, a= 16.082 (2), b = 17.104 (2), c = 13.051 (2)Å, β = 99.95 (1)°, V = 3535.9 (8) ų, Z = 2 with final residuals R1 = 0.0491 and wR2 = 0.0944. Two independent molecules, (S,S)‐Pd[(S)‐APCS]2, 1a , and (R,R)‐Pd[(S)‐APCS]2, 1b , were found in each asymmetric unit, which exchange to each other via a series of nitrogen inversion and C‐C bond rotation. The inversion energy (ΔGc₁^≠) and the energy barrier (δGc₂^≠) were 11.5 ± 0.1 Kcal mol^?1 at 246 K and 9.8 ± 0.1 Kcal mol^?1 at 199 K, respectively, calculated by dynamic NMR data.     

Phosphaniminato‐Acetato‐Komplexe von Cobalt und Cadmium mit M4N4‐Heterocuban‐Struktur

Phosphoraneiminato‐Acetato Complexes of Cobalt and Cadmium with M₄N₄ Heterocubane Structure The phosphoraneiminato‐acetato complexes [M(NPEt₃)(O₂C–CH₃)]₄ with M = Co and Cd are formed from the anhydrous metal(II) acetates with excess Me₃SiNPEt₃ at 180 °C. By crystallization from diethyl ether blue, moisture sensitive single crystals of [Co(NPEt₃) · (O₂C–CH₃)]₄ can be obtained, while colourless single crystals of [Cd(NPEt₃)(O₂C–CH₃)]₄ · 2 CH₂Cl₂ originate from dichloromethane solution. In vacuo the intercalary CH₂Cl₂ is released. The complexes are characterized by their IR spectra and by crystal structure analyses. In both complexes the metal atoms are associated via μ₃–N bridges of the (NPEt₃^–) groups to form heterocubanes. In the cobalt complex the acetato ligands are bonded in a semichelate fashion with a short Co–O and a long Co–O bond each (Co–O distances in average 199.5 and 257.4 pm). In the cadmium complex the acetato groups form almost symmetrical chelates (Cd–O distances in average 232.1 and 237.8 pm); this leads to a distorted trigonal‐bipyramidal arrangement at the cadmium atoms. [Co(NPEt₃)(O₂C–CH₃)]₄: Space group P 1, Z = 4, lattice dimensions at –60 °C: a = 1110.1(2), b = 2051.3(5), c = 2169.5(4) pm, α = 100.03(2)°, β = 103.404(15)°, γ = 97.63(2)°, R = 0.0480. [Cd(NPEt₃)(O₂C–CH₃)]₄ · 2 CH₂Cl₂: Space group C2/c, Z = 4, lattice dimensions at –80 °C: a = 1550.2(1), b = 2101.1(1), c = 1706.1(1) pm, β = 91.09(1)°, R = 0.0311.     

ZrIV‐ und TaV‐Komplexe mit methanoverbrückten Bis(aryloxy)‐Liganden

Zr^IV and Ta^V Complexes with Methano‐Bridged Bis(aryloxy) Ligands The bis(aryloxy) ligand precursor compounds bis(2‐trimethylsiloxy‐5‐tbutylphenyl)methane (L–SiMe₃) and its bromoderivative (2‐trimethylsiloxy‐3‐bromo‐5‐tbutylphenyl)(2′‐trimethylsiloxy‐5′‐tbutylphenyl)methane (L^Br–SiMe₃) are prepared in analogy to the corresponding calixarenes in excellent yields. X‐ray structure analysis for L^Br–SiMe₃: space group P2₁/c, a = 12.462(7), b = 10.466(6), c = 23.315(14) Å, β = 105.02(4)°, V = 2937(3) ų, Z = 4. L–SiMe₃ and L^Br–SiMe₃ react with Zr^IV and Ta^V chlorides in very good yields forming di‐ and trinuclear complexes. From the reaction of CpZrCl₃ with L^Br–SiMe₃ in the ratio of 3 : 2 a Zr₃ complex ( 7 ) is obtained, with one L^Br ligand only, which Zr atoms are bridged by a μ₃‐oxygen. The X‐ray structure analysis of 7 (space group R 3, a = 33.23(6), c = 24.47(8) Å, V = 23405(128) ų, Z = 18) additionally reveals that one phenolato oxygen atom of the L^Br ligand is terminally bound to a distorted tetragonal‐pyramidal coordinated Zr atom, while the second phenolato oxygen atom of the L^Br ligand forms a bridge to another Zr atom with a distorted octahedral coordination. The third Zr atom is also found in a distorted octahedral coordination mode. The reactions of L–SiMe₃ and L^Br–SiMe₃ with CpTaCl₄ and TaCl₅ yield dinuclear Ta complexes with a bridging bis(aryloxy) ligand. NMR spectroscopic data point out that the coordination of the bis(aryloxy) ligands in the Ta complexes very much resembles that in the Zr₃‐complex with one terminal and one bridging phenolato oxygen atom. The Zr₃ and the Ta complexes L^BrTa₂Cp₂Cl₆ and LTa₂Cl₈ were tested with respect to their catalytic properties in olefin polymerisation reactions in the presence of MAO.     

Redox Non‐Innocence and Isomer‐Specific Oxidative Functionalization of Ruthenium‐Coordinated β‐Ketoiminate

This article deals with isomeric ruthenium complexes [Ru^III(L^R)₂(acac)] (S=1/2) involving unsymmetric β‐ketoiminates (AcNac) (L^R=R‐AcNac, R=H ( 1 ), Cl ( 2 ), OMe ( 3 ); acac=acetylacetonate) [R=para‐substituents (H, Cl, OMe) of N‐bearing aryl group]. The isomeric identities of the complexes, cct (cis‐cis‐trans, blue, a ), ctc (cis‐trans‐cis, green, b ) and ccc (cis‐cis‐cis_, pink, c ) with respect to oxygen (acac), oxygen (L) and nitrogen (L) donors, respectively, were authenticated by their single‐crystal X‐ray structures and spectroscopic/electrochemical features. One‐electron reversible oxidation and reduction processes of 1 – 3 led to the electronic formulations of [Ru^III(L)(L ^? )(acac)]⁺ and [Ru^II(L)₂(acac)]^? for 1 ⁺‐ 3 ⁺ (S=1) and 1^? – 3^? (S=0), respectively. The triplet state of 1 ⁺‐ 3 ⁺ was corroborated by its forbidden weak half‐field signal near g≈4.0 at 4 K, revealing the non‐innocent feature of L. Interestingly, among the three isomeric forms ( a – c in 1 – 3 ), the ctc ( b in 2 b or 3 b ) isomer selectively underwent oxidative functionalization at the central β‐carbon (C?H→C=O) of one of the L ligands in air, leading to the formation of diamagnetic [Ru^II(L)(L ′ )(acac)] (L ′ =diketoimine) in 4 / 4′ . Mechanistic aspects of the oxygenation process of AcNac in 2 b were also explored via kinetic and theoretical studies.     

Über Fluoridsulfide (MFS) der Lanthanide (M = La–Nd,Sm, Gd–Lu) im A‐Typ mit PbFCl‐Struktur

On Fluoride Sulfides (MFS) of the Lanthanides (M = La–Nd, Sm, Gd–Lu) with A‐ or PbFCl‐Type Crystal Structure By the reaction of the elemental lanthanides (M = La–Nd, Sm–Lu) with the respective trifluorides (MF₃) and sulfur (S) in 2 : 1 : 3‐molar ratios at 850 °C, single‐phase fluoride sulfides of the composition MFS can be obtained in evacuated, gas‐tightly arc‐welded niobium or tantalum capsules within a few days. Exceptions are europium and ytterbium which do not react to form the corresponding fluoride sulfides under these conditions. However, at least YbFS becomes accessible through this method if platinum serves as container material. With sodium chloride (NaCl) as a flux, the formation of hydrolysis‐insensitive, platelet‐shaped A‐type single crystals with square cross‐section and the formula MFS (M = La–Nd, Sm, Gd–Er) is possible. These are very suitable for structure refinement from X‐ray diffraction data. In the PbFCl‐analogous crystal structures (tetragonal, P4/nmm, Z = 2; LaFS: a = 404.38(4), c = 700.41(7) pm; CeFS: a = 400.13(3), c = 696.20(5) pm; PrFS: a = 396.27(3), c = 692.72(5) pm; NdFS: a = 393.89(3), c = 691.58(5) pm; SmFS: a = 388.36(3), c = 687.95(5) pm; GdFS: a = 383.45(3), c = 685.18(5) pm; TbFS: a = 381.02(3), c = 683.86(5) pm; DyFS: a = 378.48(2), c = 682.51(4) pm; HoFS: a = 376.48(3), c = 681.92(5) pm; ErFS: a = 374.61(3), c = 681.34(5) pm), the M³⁺ cations are surrounded by nine anions (4 F^– and 5 S^2–) as monocapped square antiprisms. The anions themselves exhibit tetrahedral (F^–) and square‐pyramidal (S^2–) cationic coordination, respectively, according to the Niggli formula {(M³⁺)(F^–)_4/4(S^2–)_5/5}. In the case of TmFS, YbFS, and LuFS under analogous conditions, the hexagonal B‐ or trigonal C‐type modifications form at first, which can be transformed eventually to the quenchable metastable tetragonal A‐type polymorphs (TmFS: a = 372.86(5), c = 681.15(8) pm; YbFS: a = 371.08(5), c = 680.93(8) pm; LuFS: a = 369.37(5), c = 680.76(8) pm) at high pressure (20–60 kbar).     

Influence of Halogen Substitution in the Ligand Sphere on the Antitumor and Antibacterial Activity of Half‐sandwich Ruthenium(II) Complexes [RuX(η6‐arene)(C5H4N‐2‐CH=N‐Ar)]+

New complexes [(η⁶‐p‐cymene)Ru(C₅H₄N‐2‐CH=N–Ar)X]PF₆ [X = Br ( 1 ), I ( 2 ); Ar = 4‐fluorophenyl ( a ), 4‐chlorophenyl ( b ), 4‐bromophenyl ( c ), 4‐iodophenyl ( d ), 2,5‐dichlorophenyl ( e )] were prepared, as well as 3a – 3e (X = Cl) and the new complexes [(η⁶‐arene)RuCl(N‐N)]PF₆ (arene = C₆H₅OCH₂CH₂OH, N‐N = 2,2′‐bipyridine ( 4 ), 2,6‐(dimethylphenyl)‐pyridin‐2‐yl‐methylene amine ( 5 ), 2,6‐(diisopropylphenyl)‐pyridin‐2‐yl‐methylene amine ( 6 ); arene = p‐cymene, N‐N = 4‐(aminophenyl)‐pyridin‐2‐yl‐methylene amine ( 7 )]. X‐ray diffraction studies were performed for 1a , 1b , 1c , 1d , 2b , 5 , and 7 . Cytotoxicities of 1a – 1d and 2 were established versus human cancer cells epithelial colorectal adenocarcinoma (Caco‐2) (IC₅₀: 35.8–631.0 μM), breast adenocarcinoma (MCF7) (IC₅₀: 36.3–128.8.0 μM), and hepatocellular carcinoma (HepG2) (IC₅₀: 60.6–439.8 μM), 3a – 3e were tested against HepG2 and Caco‐2, and 4 – 7 were tested against Caco‐2. 1 – 7 were tested against non‐cancerous human epithelial kidney cells. 1 and 2 were more selective towards tumor cells than the anticancer drug 5‐fluorouracil (5‐FU), but 3a – 3e (X = Cl) were not selective. 1 and 2 had good activity against MCF7, some with lower IC₅₀ than 5‐FU. Complexes with X = Br or I had moderate activity against Caco‐2 and HepG2, but those with Cl were inactive. Antibacterial activities of 1a , 2b , 3a , and 7 were tested against antibacterial susceptible and resistant Gram‐negative and ‐positive bacteria. 1a , 2b , and 3a showed activity against methicillin‐resistant S. aureus (MIC = 31–2000 μg · mL^–1).     

(PPh4)2[Cl2Re(N3S2)(μ‐NSN)(μ‐N≡ReCl3)]2 – ein Rhenium(VII)‐Komplex mit einer Nitrido‐, einer Dinitridosulfato(II)‐ und einer Rhena‐3,5‐dithia‐2,4,6‐triazino‐Funktion

(PPh₄)₂[Cl₂Re(N₃S₂)(μ‐NSN)(μ‐N≡ReCl₃)]₂ – a Rhenium(VII) Complex with a Nitrido, a Dinitridosulfato(II), and a Rhena‐3,5‐dithia‐2,4,6‐triazino Function The title compound has been prepared from PPh₄[Re^VIICl₄(NSCl)₂] with N(SiMe₃)₃ in dichloromethane solution to give red‐brown single crystals, which were suitable for a crystal structure determination. As a by‐product PPh₄[ReNCl₄] is formed. (PPh₄)₂[Cl₂Re^VII(N₃S₂)(μ‐NSN)(μ‐N≡Re^VIICl₃)]₂ ( 1 ): Space group P2₁/c, Z = 2, lattice dimensions at –80 °C: a = 1280.8(2), b = 1017.5(1), c = 2467.8(3) pm, β = 95.04(1)°, R = 0.049. The complex anion of 1 consists of a planar ReN₃S₂‐heterocycle which is connected with the second rhenium atom by a μ‐nitrido bridge as well as by a μ‐dinitridosulfato(II) ligand to form a planar Re₂(N)(NSN) six‐membered heterocycle. This [Cl₂Re(N₃S₂)(μ‐NSN)(μ‐N≡ReCl₃)]^– unit dimerizes via one of the N‐atoms of the (NSN)^4– ligand to give a centrosymmetric Re₂N₂ four‐membered ring.