Synthesis,Structures, and Photophysics of Polynuclear Silver(I) Thiolate and Silver(I) Thiocarboxylate Complexes with Dppm Ligands

Trinuclear silver(I) thiolate and silver(I) thiocarboxylate complexes [Ag₃(μ‐dppm)₃(μ_n‐SR)₂](ClO₄) [n = 2, R = C₆H₄Cl‐4 ( 1 ) and C{O}Ph ( 2 ); n = 3, R = tBu ( 3 )], pentanuclear silver(I) thiolate complex [Ag₅(μ‐dppm)₄(μ₃‐SC₆H₄NO₂‐4)₄](PF₆) ( 4 ), and hexanuclear silver(I) thiolate complexes [Ag₆(μ‐dppm)₄(μ₃‐SR)₄]Y₂ [Y = ClO₄, R =C₆H₄CH₃‐4 ( 5 ) and C₁₀H₇ (2‐naphthyl) ( 7 ); Y = PF₆, R = C₆H₄OCH₃‐4( 6 )], were synthesized [dppm = bis(diphenylphosphanyl)methane] and their crystal structures as well as photophysical properties were studied. In the solid state at 77 K, trinuclear silver(I) thiolate and silver(I) thiocarboxylate complexes 1 and 2 exhibit luminescence at 470–523 nm, tentatively attributed to originate from the ³IL (intraligand) of thiolate or thiocarboxylate ligands, whereas hexanuclaer silver(I) thiolate complexes 5 and 7 produce dual emission, in which high‐energy emission is tentatively attributed to come from the ³IL of thiolate ligands and low‐energy emission is tentatively assigned to come from the admixture of metal ··· metal bond‐to‐ligand charge‐transfer (MMLCT) and metal‐centered (MC) excited states.     

Cyclopentadienyl Ruthenium(II) Complexes with Bridging Alkynylphosphine Ligands: Synthesis and Electrochemical Studies

The reaction of [CpRuCl(PPh₃)₂] (Cp=cyclopentadienyl) and [CpRuCl(dppe)] (dppe=Ph₂PCH₂CH₂PPh₂) with bis‐ and tris‐phosphine ligands 1,4‐(Ph₂PC≡C)₂C₆H₄ ( 1 ) and 1,3,5‐(Ph₂PC≡C)₃C₆H₃ ( 2 ), prepared by Ni‐catalysed cross‐coupling reactions between terminal alkynes and diphenylchlorophosphine, has been investigated. Using metal‐directed self‐assembly methodologies, two linear bimetallic complexes, [{CpRuCl(PPh₃)}₂(μ‐dppab)] ( 3 ) and [{CpRu(dppe)}₂(μ‐dppab)](PF₆)₂ ( 4 ), and the mononuclear complex [CpRuCl(PPh₃)(η¹‐dppab)] ( 6 ), which contains a “dangling arm” ligand, were prepared (dppab=1,4‐bis[(diphenylphosphino)ethynyl]benzene). Moreover, by using the triphosphine 1,3,5‐tris[(diphenylphosphino)ethynyl]benzene (tppab), the trimetallic [{CpRuCl(PPh₃)}₃(μ₃‐tppab)] ( 5 ) species was synthesised, which is the first example of a chiral‐at‐ruthenium complex containing three different stereogenic centres. Besides these open‐chain complexes, the neutral cyclic species [{CpRuCl(μ‐dppab)}₂] ( 7 ) was also obtained under different experimental conditions. The coordination chemistry of such systems towards supramolecular assemblies was tested by reaction of the bimetallic precursor 3 with additional equivalents of ligand 2 . Two rigid macrocycles based on cis coordination of dppab to [CpRu(PPh₃)] were obtained, that is, the dinuclear complex [{CpRu(PPh₃)(μ‐dppab)}₂](PF₆)₂ ( 8 ) and the tetranuclear square [{CpRu(PPh₃)(μ‐dppab)}₄](PF₆)₄ ( 9 ). The solid‐state structures of 7 and 8 have been determined by X‐ray diffraction analysis and show a different arrangement of the two parallel dppab ligands. All compounds were characterised by various methods including ESIMS, electrochemistry and by X‐band ESR spectroscopy in the case of the electrogenerated paramagnetic species.     

Über einige ein‐ und zweikernige Hydroxoiridium(I)‐Komplexe

Some mono‐ and dinuclear Hydroxoiridium(I) Complexes The chloro‐bridged iridium(I) compound [Ir₂(μ‐Cl)₂(C₈H₁₄)₄] ( 1 ) reacts in the biphasic system benzene/water with KOH in the presence of [NEt₃(CH₂Ph)]Cl (TEBA) to give the corresponding dinuclear complex [Ir₂(μ‐OH)₂(C₈H₁₄)₄] ( 2 ). Stepwise substitution of the cyclooctene ligands by PiPr₃ and ethene affords via the intermediate [Ir₂(μ‐OH)₂(C₈H₁₄)₂(PiPr₃)₂] (isolated as a mixture of isomers 3 a , b ) the product [Ir₂(μ‐OH)₂(C₂H₄)₂(PiPr₃)₂] ( 4 ) in excellent yield. Reaction of 4 with PiPr₃in the molar ratio of 1:2 leads to the formation of the mononuclear compound trans‐[Ir(OH)(C₂H₄)(PiPr₃)₂] ( 5 ), the ethene ligand of which cannot be replaced by CPh₂ upon treatment with Ph₂CN₂.     

Tricarbonylrhenium(I) Complexes with N‐Heterocyclic Thiones and Selenols

Reactions of (NEt₄)₂[Re(CO)₃Br₃] with N‐heterocyclic thiols such as 2‐mercaptobenzimidazole (H₂Sbenzim), 2‐mercaptothiazoline (HSthiaz), or 5‐mercapto‐1‐methyltetrazole (HSmetetraz) give rhenium(I) complexes of various compositions: (NEt₄)[Re(CO)₃Br₂(H₂Sbenzim)], [Re(CO)₃(HSthiaz)₃]Br, and (NEt₄)[Re₂(CO)₆(μ‐S‐Smetetraz‐κS)(μ‐N,S‐Smetetraz‐κS,N)₂]. Corresponding reactions with 2‐mercaptopyridine (HSpy) and bis(2‐pyridine)diselenide [(Sepy)₂] did not give defined products in reasonable yields, whereas [Re(CO)₅Br] reacts with HSpy and (Sepy)₂ with formation of [Re(CO)₃(HSpy)₃]Br and [Re₂(CO)₆(Sepy)₂], respectively. All reactions were performed without the addition of a supporting base and the sulfur‐containing organic ligands are coordinated in their thione forms with the exception of Smetetraz^– in its μS‐bridging coordination mode in (NEt₄)[Re₂(CO)₆(μ‐S‐Smetetraz‐κS)(μ‐N,S‐Smetetraz‐κS,N)₂], which can be regarded as thiolate. The bonding mode of the selenium containing ligands in the dimeric compound [Re₂(CO)₆(Sepy)₂] (C–Se distance: 1.93 Å) can also best be described as selenolate. The products are stable on air at an ambient temperature. They were studied spectroscopically and by X‐ray diffraction.     

Synthesis,Spectroscopy, and Structures of Mono‐ and Dinuclear Copper(I) Halide Complexes with 1,3‐Imidazolidine‐2‐thiones

Copper(I) halides with triphenyl phosphine and imidaozlidine‐2‐thiones (L ‐NMe, L ‐NEt, and L ‐NPh) in acetonitrile/methanol (or dichloromethane) yielded copper(I) mixed‐ligand complexes: mononuclear, namely, [CuCl(κ¹‐S‐L ‐NMe)(PPh₃)₂] ( 1 ), [CuBr(κ¹‐S‐L ‐NMe)(PPh₃)₂] ( 2 ), [CuBr(κ¹‐S‐L ‐NEt)(PPh₃)₂] ( 5 ), [CuI(κ¹‐S‐L ‐NEt)(PPh₃)₂] ( 6 ), [CuCl(κ¹‐S‐L ‐NPh)(PPh₃)₂] ( 7 ), and [CuBr(κ¹‐S‐L ‐NPh)(PPh₃)₂] ( 8 ), and dinuclear, [Cu₂(κ¹‐I)₂(μ‐S‐L ‐NMe)₂(PPh₃)₂] ( 3 ) and [Cu₂(μ‐Cl)₂(κ¹‐S‐L ‐NEt)₂(PPh₃)₂] ( 4 ). All complexes were characterized with analytical data, IR and NMR spectroscopy, and X‐ray crystallography. Complexes 2 – 4 , 7 , and 8 each formed crystals in the triclinic system with P$\bar{1}$ space group, whereas complexes 1 , 5 , and 6 crystallized in the monoclinic crystal system with space groups P2₁/c, C2/c, and P2₁/n, respectively. Complex 2 has shown two independent molecules, [(CuBr(κ¹‐S‐L ‐NMe)(PPh₃)₂] and [CuBr(PPh₃)₂] in the unit cell. For X = Cl, the thio‐ligand bonded to metal as terminal in complex 4 , whereas for X = I it is sulfur‐bridged in complex 3 .     

Triple Helicates with Golden Strands: Self‐Assembly of M2Au6 Complexes from Gold(I) Metallaligands and Iron(II), Cobalt(II) or Zinc(II) Cations

Alkynyl gold(I) metallaligands [(AuC≡Cbpyl)₂(μ‐diphosphine)] (bpyl=2,2′‐bipyridin‐5‐yl; diphosphine=Ph₂P(CH₂)_nPPh₂, [n=3 (L^Pr), 4 (L^Bu), 5 (L^Pent), 6 (L^Hex)], dppf (L^Fc), Binap (L^Binap) and Diop (L^Diop)) react with MX₂ (M=Fe, Zn, X=ClO₄; M=Co, X=BF₄) to give triple helicates [M₂(L^R)₃]X₄. These complexes, except those containing the semirigid L^Binap metallaligand, present similar hydrodynamic radii (determined by diffusion NMR spectroscopy measurements) and a similar pattern in the aromatic region of their ¹H NMR spectra, which suggests that in solution they adopt a compact structure where the long and flexible organometallic strands are folded. The diastereoselectivity of the self‐assembly process was studied by using chiral metallaligands, and the absolute configuration of the iron(II) complexes with L^Binap and L^Diop was determined by circular dichroism spectroscopy (CD). Thus, (R)‐L^Binap or (S)‐L^Binap specifically induce the formation of (Δ,Δ)‐[Fe₂((R)‐L^Binap)₃](ClO₄)₄ or (Λ,Λ)‐[Fe₂((S)‐L^Binap)₃](ClO₄)₄, respectively, whereas (R,R)‐ or (S,S)‐L^Diop give mixtures of the ΔΔ‐ and ΛΛ‐diastereomers. The ΔΔ helicate diastereomer is dominant in the reaction of Fe^II with (R,R)‐L^Diop, whereas the ΛΛ isomer predominates in the analogous reaction with (S,S)‐L^Diop. The photophysical properties of the new dinuclear alkynyl complexes and the helicates have been studied. The new metallaligands and the [Zn₂(L^R)₃]⁴⁺ helicates present luminescence from [π→π*] excited states mainly located in the C≡Cbpyl units.     

Nucleophilic Aromatic Addition Reactions of the Metallabenzenes and Metallapyridinium: Attacking Aromatic Metallacycles with Bis(diphenylphosphino)methane to Form Metallacyclohexadienes and Cyclic η2‐Allene‐Coordinated Complexes

The reactions of phosphonium‐substituted metallabenzenes and metallapyridinium with bis(diphenylphosphino)methane (DPPM) were investigated. Treatment of [Os{CHC(PPh₃)CHC(PPh₃)CH}Cl₂(PPh₃)₂]Cl with DPPM produced osmabenzenes [Os{CHC(PPh₃)CHC(PPh₃)CH}Cl₂{(PPh₂)CH₂(PPh₂)}]Cl ( 2 ), [Os{CHC(PPh₃)CHC(PPh₃)CH}Cl{(PPh₂)CH₂(PPh₂)}₂]Cl₂ ( 3 ), and cyclic osmium η²‐allene complex [Os{CH?C(PPh₃)CH?(η²‐C?CH)}Cl₂{(PPh₂)CH₂(PPh₂)}₂]Cl ( 4 ). When the analogue complex of osmabenzene 1 , ruthenabenzene [Ru{CHC(PPh₃)CHC(PPh₃)CH}Cl₂(PPh₃)₂]Cl, was used, the reaction produced ruthenacyclohexadiene [Ru{CH?C(PPh₃)CH?C(PPh₃)CH}Cl{(PPh₂)CH₂(PPh₂)}₂]Cl₂ ( 6 ), which could be viewed as a Jackson–Meisenheimer complex. Complex 6 is unstable in solution and can easily be convert to the cyclic ruthenium η²‐allene complexes [Ru{CH?C(PPh₃)CH?(η²‐C?CH)}Cl{(PPh₂)CH₂(PPh₂)}₂]Cl₂ ( 7 ) and [Ru{CH?C(PPh₃)CH?(η²‐C?CH)}Cl₂{(PPh₂)CH₂(PPh₂)}₂]Cl ( 8 ). The key intermediates of the reactions have been isolated and fully characterized, further supporting the proposed mechanism for the reactions. Similar reactions also occurred in phosphonium‐substituted metallapyridinium [OsCl₂{NHC(CH₃)C(Ph)C(PPh₃)CH}(PPh₃)₂]BF₄ to give the cyclic osmium η²‐allene‐imine complex [OsCl₂{NH?C(CH₃)C(Ph)?(η²‐C?CH)}{(PPh₂)CH₂(PPh₂)}(PPh₃)]BF₄ ( 11 ).     

Preparation and Characterization of Trimethylsilylpyridylacetylene Bridged,Dicobalt Carbonyl Complexes Containing Bis(diphenylphosphino)methylene or Bis(diphenylphosphino)ethylene Ligand

Reaction of an alkyne‐bridged dicobalt complex, [Co₂(CO)₆(μ‐Me₃SiC=Cpy)] 4 , with bis(diphenylphosphino)methylene (DPPM) or bis(diphenylphosphino)ethylene (DPPE) in THF at 55 °C yielded a DPPM or DPPE doubly bridged dicobalt compound, [{μ‐P,P‐PPh₂CH₂PPh₂}Co₂(CO)₄(μ‐Me₃SiC=Cpy)] 5 or [{μ‐P,P‐PPh₂CH₂CH₂PPh₂}Co₂(CO)₄(μ‐Me₃SiC≡Cpy)] 6 . Compound 5 and 6 were characterized by spectroscopic means as well as X‐ray crystal structure determination.     

Preparation and Characterization of a Novel Palladium Complex: cis‐Dichloride(1,2‐bis(diphenylphosphino)vinyl‐P,P′,C)palladium(II)‐(bis(diphenylphosphino)methane‐P,P′)cobaltacarbonyl

A novel palladium complex 4, cis‐dichloride(1,2‐bis(diphenylphosphino)vinyl‐P,P′,C)palladium(II)‐(bis(diphenylphosphino)methane‐P,P′)cobaltacarbonyl, was obtained and characterized from the treatment of [(μ‐Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂)Co₂(CO)₄][(Ph₂PC≡CPPh₂)‐PdCl₂] 3 with hydrochloric acid. The framework of 4 can be regarded as a grouping of two metal‐containing fragments: ‐Co(CO)₂(dppm) and PdCl2(μ‐P,P‐Ph₂PCH=C(‐)PPh₂).     

Oxorhenium(V)‐ and Tricarbonylrhenium(I) Complexes with Substituted Pyrazoles as Products of the Degradation of Hydrotrispyrazolylborates

Hydrotris(3, 5‐dimethylpyrazol‐1‐yl)borate and hydrotris(3‐phenylpyrazol‐1‐yl)borate decompose during reactions with [ReOCl₃(PPh₃)₂] and [NEt₄]₂[Re(CO)₃Br₃], respectively. The generated pyrazole ligands form complexes with the rhenium(V) oxo and the rhenium(I ) tricarbonyl cores. X‐ray crystal structures of the oxo‐bridged dimer [Cl(PPh₃)(O)Re(μ‐O)(μ‐Me₂pz)₂Re(O)(HMe₂pz)Cl] ( 1 ) and [Re(CO)₃(HPhpz)₂(Phpz)] ( 2 ) (HMe₂pz = 3, 5‐dimethylpyrazole, HPhpz = 3‐phenylpyrazole) show that the substituted pyrazoles can readily deprotonate and act as monodentate or bridging anionic ligands. Re‐N bond lengths between 2.09 and 2.14Å have been observed for the bridging and between 2.12 and 2.23Å for the terminal pyrazole ligands.     

Intramolecular Asymmetric Amidations of Sulfonamides and Sulfamates Catalyzed by Chiral Dirhodium(II) Complexes

Enantioselective intramolecular amidation of aliphatic sulfonamides was achieved for the first time by means of chiral carboxylatodirhodium(II) catalysts in conjunction with PhI(OAc)₂ and MgO in high yields and with enantioselectivities of up to 66% (Scheme 3, Table 1). The best results were obtained with [Rh₂{(S)‐nttl)₄] and [Rh₂{(R)‐ntv)₄] as catalysts ((S)‐nttl=(αS)‐α‐(tert‐butyl)‐1,3‐dioxo‐2H‐benz[de]isoquinoline‐2‐acetato, (R)‐nto=(αR)‐α‐isopropyl‐1,3‐dioxo‐2H‐benz[de] isoquinoline‐2‐acetato). In addition, these carboxylatodirhodium(II) catalysts were also efficient in intramolecular amidations of aliphatic sulfamates esters, although the enantioselectivity of these latter reactions was significantly lower (Scheme 4, Table 3).     

Tripropylarsane Complexes of Palladium(II) and Platinum(II) — Syntheses,Spectroscopy, and Structures

Several palladium(II) and platinum(II) complexes of tripropylarsanes (AsR₃; R = Pr, iPr) with the formulae, [MCl₂(AsR₃)₂], [M₂Cl₂(μ‐Cl)₂(AsR₃)₂], [Pd₂Me₂(μ‐Cl)₂(AsR₃)₂], [Pd₂X₂(μ‐Pz)₂(AsR₃)₂] (X = Cl or Me, Pz = pyrazolate), [Pd₂Cl₂(μ‐Y)₂(AsR₃)₂] (Y = OAc or SPh), [MCl(S₂CNEt₂)(AsR₃)] and [PdCp(Cl)(AsiPr₃)] (M = Pd or Pt) have been prepared. All the complexes have been characterised by elemental analyses, IR and ¹H NMR spectroscopy. The stereochemistry of the complexes has been deduced from the spectroscopic data. The structures of [Pd₂Me₂(μ‐X)₂(AsiPr₃)₂] (X = Cl or Pz) have been established by single crystal X‐ray diffraction analyses. Both of the complexes have sym‐trans configuration. Strong trans influence of the methyl group is reflected on the Pd—X bond distances.     

Syntheses,Structures, and Catalytic Reactions of Palladium Adducts of Chiral Diphosphines That Contain a Rhenium Stereocenter in the Backbone

Reactions of the title diphosphines [(η⁵‐C₅H₄PPh₂)Re(NO)(PPh₃)((CH₂)_nPPh₂)] (n=0, (R)‐ 1 ; n=1, racemic or (S)‐ 2 ) with [PdCl₂(PhCN)₂] give the palladium/rhenium chelate complexes [(η⁵‐C₅H₄PPh₂)Re(NO)(PPh₃)((μ‐CH₂)_nPPh₂)PdCl₂] (n=0, (S)‐ 5 ; n=1, racemic or (S)‐ 6 ) in 75–92% yield. The crystal structure of racemic 6 shows a twisted‐boat conformation of the chelate ring, giving a chiral pocket very different from that in a related rhodium chelate. However, NOE experiments suggest a similar ensemble of conformations in solution. Catalysts are generated from various combinations of a) Pd(OAc)₂ and (R)‐ 1 or (S)‐ 2 (1 : 2), b) (S)‐ 5 or (S)‐ 6 and (R)‐ 1 or (S)‐ 2 (1 : 2), or c) (i‐Bu)₂AlH with the preceding recipes. These factors effect the Heck arylation of 2,3‐dihydrofuran with phenyl trifluoromethylsulfonate. In contrast to analogous reactions with (R)‐binap (=(R)‐2,2′‐bis(diphenylphosphanyl)‐1,1′‐binaphthalene), the major product 2‐phenyl‐2,3‐dihydrofuran is nearly racemic (≤12% ee).     

The conformations of two copper(I) complexes of 1H‐benzimidazole‐2(3H)‐thione and thiosaccharinate

(Acetonitrile‐1κN)[μ‐1H‐benzimidazole‐2(3H)‐thione‐1:2κ²S:S][1H‐benzimidazole‐2(3H)‐thione‐2κS]bis(μ‐1,1‐dioxo‐1λ⁶,2‐benzothiazole‐3‐thiolato)‐1:2κ²S³:N;1:2κ²S³:S³‐dicopper(I)(Cu—Cu), [Cu₂(C₇H₄NO₂S₂)₂(C₇H₆N₂S)₂(CH₃CN)] or [Cu₂(tsac)₂(Sbim)₂(CH₃CN)] [tsac is thiosaccharinate and Sbim is 1H‐benzimidazole‐2(3H)‐thione], (I), is a new copper(I) compound that consists of a triply bridged dinuclear Cu—Cu unit. In the complex molecule, two tsac anions and one neutral Sbim ligand bind the metals. One anion bridges via the endocyclic N and exocyclic S atoms (μ‐S:N). The other anion and one of the mercaptobenzimidazole molecules bridge the metals through their exocyclic S atoms (μ‐S:S). The second Sbim ligand coordinates in a monodentate fashion (κS) to one Cu atom, while an acetonitrile molecule coordinates to the other Cu atom. The Cu^I—Cu^I distance [2.6286 (6) Å] can be considered a strong `cuprophilic' interaction. In the case of [μ‐1H‐benzimidazole‐2(3H)‐thione‐1:2κ²S:S]bis[1H‐benzimidazole‐2(3H)‐thione]‐1κS;2κS‐bis(μ‐1,1‐dioxo‐1λ⁶,2‐benzothiazole‐3‐thiolato)‐1:2κ²S³:N;1:2κ²S³:S³‐dicopper(I)(Cu—Cu), [Cu₂(C₇H₄NO₂S₂)₂(C₇H₆N₂S)₃] or [Cu₂(tsac)₂(Sbim)₃], (II), the acetonitrile molecule is substituted by an additional Sbim ligand, which binds one Cu atom via the exocylic S atom. In this case, the Cu^I—Cu^I distance is 2.6068 (11) Å.     

Hexanuclear Gold(I) Phosphide Complexes as Platforms for Multiple Redox‐Active Ferrocenyl Units

The synthesis, X‐ray crystal structures, electrochemical, and spectroscopic studies of a series of hexanuclear gold(I) μ₃‐ferrocenylmethylphosphido complexes stabilized by bridging phosphine ligands, [Au₆(P?P)_n(Fc‐CH₂‐P)₂][PF₆]₂ (n=3, P?P=dppm (bis(diphenylphosphino)methane) ( 1 ), dppe (1,2‐bis(diphenylphosphino)ethane) ( 2 ), dppp (1,3‐bis(diphenylphosphino)propane) ( 3 ), Ph₂PN(C₃H₇)‐PPh₂ ( 4 ), Ph₂PN(Ph‐CH₃‐p)PPh₂ ( 5 ), dppf (1,1′‐bis(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene) ( 6 ); n=2, P?P=dpepp (bis(2‐diphenylphosphinoethyl)phenylphosphine) ( 7 )), as platforms for multiple redox‐active ferrocenyl units, are reported. The investigation of the structural changes of the clusters has been probed by introducing different bridging phosphine ligands. This class of gold(I) μ₃‐ferrocenylmethylphosphido complexes has been found to exhibit one reversible oxidation couple, suggestive of the absence of electronic communication between the ferrocene units through the Au₆P₂ cluster core, providing an understanding of the electronic properties of the hexanuclear Au^I cluster linkage. The present complexes also serve as an ideal system for the design of multi‐electron reservoir and molecular battery systems.     

Combining Topological and Steric Constraints for the Preparation of Heteroleptic Copper(I) Complexes

Heteroleptic copper(I) complexes have been prepared from a macrocyclic ligand incorporating a 2,9‐diphenyl‐1,10‐phenanthroline subunit ( M30 ) and two bis‐phosphines, namely bis[(2‐diphenylphosphino)phenyl] ether (POP) and 1,3‐bis(diphenylphosphino)propane (dppp). In both cases, the diphenylphosphino moieties of the PP ligand are too bulky to pass through the 30‐membered ring of M30 during the coordination process, hence the formation of C_2v‐symmetrical pseudo‐rotaxanes is prevented. When POP is used, X‐ray crystal structure analysis shows the formation of a highly distorted [Cu( M30 )(POP)]⁺ complex in which the POP ligand is only partially threaded through the M30 unit. This compound is poorly stable as the Cu^I cation is not in a favorable coordination environment due to steric constraints. By contrast, in the case of dppp, the bis‐phosphine ligand undergoes both steric and topological constraints and adopts a nonchelating coordination mode to generate [Cu₂( M30 )₂(μ‐dppp)](BF₄)₂. This compound exhibits metal‐to‐ligand charge transfer (MLCT) emission characterized by a very large Stokes’ shift (≈200 nm) that is not attributed to a dramatic structural distortion between the ground and the emitting states but to very weak MLCT absorption transitions at longer wavelengths. Accordingly, [Cu₂( M30 )₂(μ‐dppp)](BF₄)₂ shows unusually high luminescence quantum yields for Cu^I complexes, both in solution and in the solid state (0.5 and 7 %, respectively).     

Novel Cyclometallated Complexes Derived From a Halogenated Thiosemicarbazone. Crystal and Molecular Structures of 2‐FC6H4C(Me)=NN(H)C(=S)NHPh and [(Pd{2‐FC6H3C(Me)=NN=C(S)NHPh})2(μ‐PPh2(CH2)2PPh2)]

Treatment of the thiosemicarbazone 2‐FC₆H₄C(Me)=NN(H)C(=S)NHPh, a , with palladium(II) acetate in acetic acid, or with lithium tetrachloropalladate(II) in methanol, gave the tetranuclear cyclometallated complex [Pd{2‐FC₆H₃C(Me)=NN=C(S)NHPh}]₄ (1a) . Reaction of 1a with the diphosphines Ph₂P(CH₂)₂PPh₂ (dppe), Ph₂PCH=CHPPh₂ (trans‐dpe) Ph₂P(CH₂)₃Ph₂ (dppp) or Ph₂P(CH₂)₄Ph₂ (dppb) in a 1:2 molar ratio gave the dinuclear cyclometallated complexes [(Pd{2‐FC₆H₃C(Me)=NN=C(S)NHPh})₂(μ‐Ph₂P(CH₂)_nPPh₂)], (n = 2, 2a ; 3, 4a ; 4, 5a ) and [(Pd{2‐FC₆H₃C(Me)=NN=C(S)NHPh})₂(μ‐Ph₂PCH=CHPPh₂)], ( 3a ). The X‐ray crystal structure of ligand a and of complex 2a are described. The structure of complex 2a shows the palladium atom is bonded to four different donor atoms: C, N, S and P.     

Zur Reaktivität von dinuklearen Platina‐β‐diketonen gegenüber Phosphanen: Diacetylplatin(II)‐Komplexe und mononukleare Platina‐β‐diketone

The Reactivity of Dinuclear Platina‐β‐diketones with Phosphines: Diacetylplatinum(II) Complexes and Mononuclear Platina‐β‐diketones Addition of mono‐ and bidentate phosphines or of AsPh₃ to the platina‐β‐diketone [Pt₂{(COMe)₂H}₂(μ‐Cl)₂] ( 1 ) followed by the addition of NaOMe at ?70 °C resulted in the formation of diacetyl platinum(II) complexes cis‐[Pt(COMe)₂L₂] (L = PPh₃, 2a ; P(4‐FC₆H₄)₃, 2b ; PPh₂(4‐py), 2c ; PMePh₂, 2d ; AsPh₃, 2d ) and [Pt(COMe)₂(L??L)] (L??L = dppe, 3b ; dppp, 3c ), respectively. The analogous reaction with dppm afforded the dinuclear complex cis‐[{Pt(COMe)₂}₂(μ‐dppm)₂] ( 4 ) that reacted in boiling acetone yielding [Pt(COMe)₂(dppm)] ( 3a ). The reactions 1 → 2 / 3 were found to proceed via thermally highly unstable cationic mononuclear platina‐β‐diketone intermediates [Pt{(COMe)₂H}L₂]⁺ and [Pt{(COMe)₂H}(L??L)]⁺, respectively, that could be isolated as chlorides for L??L = dppe ( 5a ) and dppp ( 5b ). The reversibility of the deprotonation of type 5 complexes with NaOMe yielding type 3 complexes was shown by the protonation of the diacetyl complex 3b with HBF₄ yielding the platina‐β‐diketone [Pt{(COMe)₂H}(dppe)](BF₄) ( 5c ). All compounds were fully characterized by means of NMR and IR spectroscopies, and microanalyses. X‐ray diffraction analysis was performed for the complex cis‐[Pt(COMe)₂(PPh₃)₂]·H₂O·CHCl₃ ( 2a ·H₂O·CHCl₃).     

Copper(I) and Gold(I) Complexes with N,N′‐Bis(diphenylphosphino)‐2,6‐diaminopyridine as Ligand: Synthesis and Molecular Structures

Reaction of CuI with 1 or 2 equivalent(s) N,N′‐Bis(diphenylphosphino)‐2,6‐diaminopyridine (BDDP) gives two different complexes, [Cu(I)μ‐(BDDP‐κP,N_py)]₂ ( 1 ) and [Cu(BDDP‐κP,N_py)₂]I ( 2 ), in high yields. The determination of the molecular structure show that both Cu^I atoms are tetrahedrally coordinated, rather than a square‐planar geometry reported for Cr⁰, Ni^II‐BDDP complexes before, which contains a planar tridentate chelate ring system. The introduction of AuCl(tht) (tht = tetrahydrothiophene) into [Cu(BDDP‐κP,N_py)₂]I leads unexpectedly to the formation of a digold complex 2,6‐[(ClAuPh₂P)HN]₂C₅H₃N and dimeric [Cu(I)μ‐(BDDP‐κP,N_py)]₂.     

Molybdän‐ und Wolfram‐Komplexe mit MNS‐Sequenzen. Die Kristallstrukturen von [MoCl3(N3S2)(1,4‐Dioxan)2] und [Mo2Cl2(μ‐NSN)2(μ‐O)(NCMe3)(OCMe3)2]2

Molybdenum and Tungsten Complexes with MNS Sequences. Crystal Structures of [MoCl₃(N₃S₂)(1,4‐dioxane)₂] and [Mo₂Cl₂(μ‐NSN)₂(μ‐O)(NCMe₃)(OCMe₃)₂]₂ The cyclo‐thiazeno complexes [Cl₃MNSNSN]₂ of molybdenum and tungsten react with 1,4‐dioxane in dichloromethane suspension to give the binuclear donor‐acceptor complexes [μ‐(1,4‐dioxane){MCl₃(N₃S₂)}₂] which are characterized by IR spectroscopy. With excess 1,4‐dioxane the molybdenum compound forms the complex [MoCl₃(N₃S₂)(1,4‐dioxane)₂] in which, according to the crystal structure determination, one of the dioxane molecules coordinates at the molybdenum atom, the other one at one of the sulfur atoms of the cyclo‐thiazeno ring. The μ‐(NSN^2–) complex [Mo₂Cl₂(μ‐NSN)₂(μ‐O)(NCMe₃)(OCMe₃)₂]₂ has been obtained by the reaction of [MoN(OCMe₃)₃] with trithiazyle chloride in carbontetrachloride solution. According to the crystal structure determination this compound forms centrosymmetric dimeric molecules via two of the nitrogen atoms of two of the μ‐(NSN) groups to give a Mo₂N₂ fourmembered ring. [MoCl₃(N₃S₂)(1,4‐dioxane)₂]: Space group P2₁/c, Z = 4, lattice dimensions at –70 °C: a = 1522.9(2); b = 990.3(1); c = 1161.7(1) pm; β = 106.31(1)°, R₁ = 0.0317. [Mo₂Cl₂(μ‐NSN)₂(μ‐O)(NCMe₃)(OCMe₃)₂]₂ · 4 CCl₄: Space group P2₁/c, Z = 2, lattice dimensions at –83 °C: a = 1216.7(1); b = 2193.1(2); c = 1321.8(1) pm; β = 98.23(1)°; R₁ = 0.0507.