Light‐Induced Conformational Changes in the Plant Cryptochrome Photolyase Homology Region Resolved by Selective Isotope Labeling and Infrared Spectroscopy

Plant cryptochromes are photoreceptors that regulate flowering, circadian rhythm and photomorphogenesis in response to blue and UV‐A light. It has been demonstrated that the oxidized flavin cofactor is photoreduced to the neutral radical state via separate electron and proton transfer. Conformational changes have been found in the C‐terminal extension, but few studies have addressed the changes in secondary structure in the sensory photolyase homology region (PHR). Here, we investigated the PHR of the plant cryptochrome from the green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii by light‐induced infrared difference spectroscopy in combination with global ¹³C and ¹⁵N isotope labeling. Assignment of the signals is achieved by establishing a labeling strategy for cryptochromes that preserves the flavin at natural abundance. We demonstrate by UV/vis spectroscopy that the integrity of the sample is maintained and by mass spectrometry that the global labeling was highly efficient. As a result, difference bands are resolved at full intensity that at natural abundance are compensated by the overlap of flavin and protein signals. These bands are assigned to prominent conformational changes in the PHR by blue light illumination. We postulate that not only the partial unfolding of the C‐terminal extension but also changes in the PHR may mediate signaling events.     

Cryptochrome signaling in plants

Cryptochromes are blue light receptors that mediate various light-induced responses in plants and animals. They share sequence similarity to photolyases, flavoproteins that catalyze the repair of UV light-damaged DNA, but do not have photolyase activity. Arabidopsis cryptochromes work together with the red/far-red light receptor phytochromes to regulate various light responses, including the regulation of cell elongation and photoperiodic flowering, and are also found to act together with the blue light receptor phototropins to mediate blue light regulation of stomatal opening. The signaling mechanism of Arabidopsis cryptochromes is mediated through negative regulation of COP1 by direct CRY-COP1 interaction through CRY C-terminal domain. Arabidopsis CRY dimerized through its N-terminal domain and dimerization of CRY is required for light activation of the photoreceptor activity. Recently, significant progresses have been made in our understanding of cryptochrome functions in other dicots such as pea and tomato and lower plants including moss and fern. This review will focus on recent advances in functional and mechanism characterization of cryptochromes in plants. It is not intended to cover every aspect of the field; readers are referred to other review articles for historical perspectives and a more comprehensive understanding of this photoreceptor.     

Retinal Photodamage by Endogenous and Xenobiotic Agents†

The human eye is constantly exposed to sunlight and artificial lighting. Light transmission through the eye is fundamental to its unique biological functions of directing vision and circadian rhythm and therefore light absorbed by the eye must be benign. However, exposure to the very intense ambient radiation can pose a hazard particularly if the recipient is over 40 years of age. There are age‐related changes in the endogenous (natural) chromophores (lipofuscin, A2E and all‐trans‐retinal derivatives) in the human retina that makes it more susceptible to visible light damage. Intense visible light sources that do not filter short blue visible light (400–440 nm) used for phototherapy of circadian imbalance (i.e. seasonal affective disorder) increase the risk for age‐related light damage to the retina. Moreover, many drugs, dietary supplements, nanoparticles and diagnostic dyes (xenobiotics) absorb ocular light and have the potential to induce photodamage to the retina, leading to transient or permanent blinding disorders. This article will review the underlying reasons why visible light in general and short blue visible light in particular dramatically raises the risk of photodamage to the human retina.     

Old chromophores, new photoactivation paradigms, trendy applications: flavins in blue light-sensing photoreceptors

The knowledge on the mechanisms by which blue light (BL) is sensed by diverse and numerous organisms, and of the physiological responses elicited by the BL photoreceptors, has grown remarkably during the last two decades. The basis for this "blue revival" was set by the identification and molecular characterization of long sought plant BL sensors, employing flavins as chromophores, chiefly cryptochromes and phototropins. The latter photosensors are the foundation members of the so-called light, oxygen, voltage (LOV)-protein family, largely spread among archaea, bacteria, fungi and plants. The accumulation of sequenced microbial genomes during the last years has added the BLUF (Blue Light sensing Using FAD) family to the BL photoreceptors and yielded the opportunity for intense "genome mining," which has presented to us the intriguing wealth of BL sensing in prokaryotes. In this contribution we provide an update of flavin-based BL sensors of the LOV and BLUF type, from prokaryotic microorganisms, with special emphasis to their light-activation pathways and molecular signal-transduction mechanisms. Rather than being a fully comprehensive review, this research collects the most recent discoveries and aims to unveil and compare signaling pathways and mechanisms of BL sensors.     

Solving Blue Light Riddles: New Lessons from Flavin‐binding LOV Photoreceptors

Detection of blue light (BL) via flavin‐binding photoreceptors (Fl‐Blues) has evolved throughout all three domains of life. Although the main BL players, that is light, oxygen and voltage (LOV), blue light sensing using flavins (BLUF) and Cry (cryptochrome) proteins, have been characterized in great detail with respect to structure and function, still several unresolved issues at different levels of complexity remain and novel unexpected findings were reported. Here, we review the most prevailing riddles of LOV‐based photoreceptors, for example: the relevance of water and/or small metabolites for the dynamics of the photocycle; molecular details of light‐to‐signal transduction events; the interplay of BL sensing by LOV domains with other environmental stimuli, such as BL plus oxygen‐mediating photodamage and its impact on microbial lifestyles; the importance of the cell or chromophore redox state in determining the fate of BL‐driven reactions; the evolutionary pathways of LOV‐based BL sensing and associated functions through the diverse phyla. We will discuss major novelties emerged during the last few years on these intriguing aspects of LOV proteins by presenting paradigmatic examples from prokaryotic photosensors that exhibit the largest complexity and richness in associated functions.     

ORCADIAN OSCILLATORS AND PHOTORECEPTORS IN THE GASTROPOD,APLYSIA*

Abstract— The sea slug, Aplysia, is a useful model system for research on the neurophysiology of circadian integration. The animal contains several circadian oscillators and several photoreceptors. Each eye contains a circadian oscillator as well as photoreceptors. The ocular oscillators can be entrained by extraocular photoreceptors as well as their own ocular photoreceptors. The abdominal ganglion probably contains another oscillator but it has been much more difficult to manipulate in the laboratory than have the oscillators in the eyes. There is also a circadian rhythm in overt behavioral activity. This rhythm is controlled in part by extraocular oscillators and extraocular photoreceptors and in part by the eyes. In exerting their influence on the behavioral rhythm, the eyes appear to act in the capacity of oscillators and not merely as photoreceptors. Although neurons in the retina have neurosecretory morphology, the entire influence of the eyes on the behavioral rhythm appears to be mediated by nerve signals which travel in the optic nerve. As yet there is no evidence to suggest that any two oscillators in Aplysia are internally coupled. There is also no evidence yet for hormonal coupling between photoreceptors and oscillators or between oscillators and rhythmic outputs.     

Targeted Inactivation of DNA Photolyase Genes in Medaka Fish (Oryzias latipes)

Proteins of the cryptochrome/photolyase family (CPF) exhibit sequence and structural conservation, but their functions are divergent. Photolyase is a DNA repair enzyme that catalyzes the light‐dependent repair of ultraviolet (UV)‐induced photoproducts, whereas cryptochrome acts as a photoreceptor or circadian clock protein. Two types of DNA photolyase exist: CPD photolyase, which repairs cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs), and 6‐4 photolyase, which repairs 6‐4 pyrimidine–pyrimidone photoproducts (6‐4PPs). Although the Cry‐DASH protein is classified as a cryptochrome, it also has light‐dependent DNA repair activity. To determine the significance of the three light‐dependent repair enzymes in recovering from solar UV‐induced DNA damage at the organismal level, we generated mutants in each gene in medaka using the CRISPR genome editing technique. The light‐dependent repair activity of the mutants was examined in vitro in cultured cells and in vivo in skin tissue. Light‐dependent repair of CPD was lost in the CPD photolyase‐deficient mutant, whereas weak repair activity against 6‐4PPs persisted in the 6‐4 photolyase‐deficient mutant. These results suggest the existence of a heretofore unknown 6‐4PP repair pathway and thus improve our understanding of the mechanisms of defense against solar UV in vertebrates.     

Selective Photoreceptor Gene Knock‐out Reveals a Regulatory Role for the Growth Behavior of Pseudomonas syringae

The plant pathogen Pseudomonas syringae (Ps) is a well‐established model organism for bacterial infection of plants. The genome sequences of two pathovars, pv. syringae and pv. tomato, revealed one gene encoding a blue and two genes encoding red/far red light‐sensing photoreceptors. Continuing former molecular characterization of the photoreceptor proteins, we here report selective photoreceptor gene disruption for pv. tomato aiming at identification of potentially regulatory functions of these photoreceptors. Transformation of Ps cells with linear DNA constructs yielded interposon mutations of the corresponding genes. Cell growth studies of the generated photoreceptor knock‐out mutants revealed their role in light‐dependent regulation of cell growth and motility. Disruption of the blue‐light (BL) receptor gene caused a growth deregulation, in line with an observed increased virulence of this mutant (Moriconi et al., Plant J., 2013, 76, 322). Bacterial phytochrome‐1 (BphP1) deletion mutant caused unaltered cell growth, but a stronger swarming capacity. Inactivation of its ortholog, BphP2, however, caused reduced growth and remarkably altered dendritic swarming behavior. Combined knock‐out of both bacteriophytochromes reproduced the swarming pattern observed for the BphP2 mutant alone. A triple knock‐out mutant showed a growth rate between that of the BL (deregulation) and the phytochrome‐2 mutant (growth reduction).     

REDOX DYES AS ARTIFICIAL PHOTORECEPTORS IN LIGHT-DEPENDENT CAROTENOID SYNTHESIS*

Abstract— The photodynamically active dyes methylene blue, toluidine blue, and neutral red act as artificial photoreceptors in light-dependent carotenoid synthesis in Fusarium aquaeductuum. Normally, carotenoid production is only induced by light of wavelengths shorter than 520 nm, but when mycelia are incubated with neutral red, methylene blue, and toluidine blue, red light is also effective in inducing carotenogenesis. Experiments with methylene blue and red light showed that pigments induced under these conditions are qualitatively the same as those induced with white light, and also that, in accord with the results found for photoinduction with white light, the amount of pigment synthesized was proportional to the logarithm of illumination time. In addition to their role in photoinduction, the dyes were also shown to interfere with the biosynthesis of carotenoids, whereas addition after irradiation caused an increase in pigment production that involves a quantitative change in the more unsaturated components.     

THE MODE OF INTERACTION BETWEEN BLUE (UV) LIGHT PHOTORECEPTOR AND PHYTOCHROME IN ANTHOCYANIN FORMATION OF THE SORGHUM SEEDLING

Two non-photosynthetic photoreceptors (phytochrome and a blue light photoreceptor) are involved in light-mediated anthocyanin synthesis in the mesocotyl of Sorghum seedlings. The present study was undertaken to investigate the kind of interaction between phytochrome and the blue light photoreceptor. The data show that phytochrome (P_fr) can only act once a blue light effect has occurred. On the other hand, the blue light effect cannot express itself without P_fr. It is concluded that there is an obligatory dependency (or sequential interaction) between the blue light effect and the light effect occurring through phytochrome, although the blue light photoreaction per se is not affected by the presence or absence of phytochrome. The latter statement is based on the results of dichromatic experiments, i.e. simultaneous, high fluence rate irradiation with two kinds of light. Blue light can be replaced by UV light. It is not clarified yet whether the effect of blue and UV light is due to the same photoreceptor.     

Photochemistry and photobiology of cryptochrome blue-light photopigments: the search for a photocycle

Cryptochromes are flavoproteins that exhibit high sequence and structural similarity to the light-dependent DNA-repair enzyme, photolyase. Cryptochromes have lost the ability to repair DNA; instead, they use the energy from near-UV/blue light to regulate a variety of growth and adaptive processes in organisms ranging from bacteria to humans. The photocycle of cryptochrome is not yet known, although it is hypothesized that it may share some similarity to that of photolyase, which utilizes light-driven electron transfer from the catalytic flavin chromophore. In this review, we present genetic evidence for the photoreceptive role of cryptochromes and discuss recent biochemical studies that have furthered our understanding of the cryptochrome photocycle. In particular, the role of the unique C-terminal domain in cryptochrome phototransduction is discussed.     

BLUE AND ULTRAVIOLET-B LIGHT PHOTORECEPTORS IN PARSLEY CELLS

Abstract— Ultraviolet-B (UV-B) and blue light photoreceptors have been shown to regulate chalcone synthase and flavonoid synthesis in parsley cell cultures. These photoreceptors have not yet been identified. In the present work, we studied UV-B photoreception with physiological experiments involving temperature shifts and examined the possible role of flavin in blue and UV-B light photoreception. Cells irradiated with UV-B light (0.5–15 min) at 2°C have the same fluence requirement for chalcone synthase and flavonoid induction as controls irradiated at 25°C. This is indicative of a purely photochemical reaction. Cells fed with riboflavin and irradiated with 6 h of UV-containing white light synthesize higher levels of chalcone synthase and flavonoid than unfed controls. This effect did not occur with blue light. These results indicate that flavin-sensitization requires excitation of flavin and the UV-B light photoreceptor. The in vivo kinetics of flavin uptake and bleaching indicate that the added flavin may act at the surface of the plasma membrane. In view of the likely role of membrane-associated flavin in photoreception, we measured in vitro flavin binding to microsomal membranes. At least one microsomal flavin binding site was solubilized by resuspension of a microsomal pellet in buffer with high KPi and NaCl concentrations and centrifugation at 38000 g. The 38000 g insoluble fraction had much greater flavin binding and contained a receptor with an apparent K_D of about 3.6 μM and an estimated in vivo concentration of at least 6.7 × 10–⁸M. Flavin mononucleotide, roseoflavin, and flavin adenine dinucleotide can compete with riboflavin for this binding site(s), although each has lower affinity than riboflavin. Most microsomal protein was solubilized by resuspension of the microsomal pellet in non-denaturing detergents and centrifugation at 38 000 g ; however, this inhibited flavin binding, presumably because of disruption of the environment of the flavin receptor. The parsley microsomal flavin binding receptor(s) have a possible role in physiological photoreception.     

Transformation of Receptor Tyrosine Kinases into Glutamate Receptors and Photoreceptors

Receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) are key regulators of cellular functions in metazoans. In vertebrates, RTKs are mostly activated by polypeptides but are not naturally sensitive to amino acids or light. Taking inspiration from Venus kinase receptors (VKRs), an atypical family of RTKs found in nature, we have transformed the human insulin (hIR) and hepatocyte growth factor receptor (hMET) into glutamate receptors by replacing their extracellular binding domains with the ligand‐binding domain of metabotropic glutamate receptor type 2 (mGluR2). We then imparted light sensitivity through covalent attachment of a synthetic glutamate‐based photoswitch via a self‐labelling SNAP tag. By employing a Xenopus laevis oocyte kinase activity assay, we demonstrate how these chimeric RTKs, termed light‐controlled human insulin receptor (LihIR) and light‐controlled human MET receptor (LihMET), can be used to exert optical control over the insulin or MET signaling pathways. Our results outline a potentially general strategy to convert RTKs into photoreceptors.     

The Evolution and Functional Role of Flavin‐based Prokaryotic Photoreceptors

Flavin‐based photoreceptor proteins of the LOV (light, oxygen and voltage) superfamily are ubiquitous and appear to be essential blue‐light sensing systems not only in plants, algae and fungi, but also in prokaryotes, where they are represented in more than 10% of known species. Despite their broad occurrence, only in few cases LOV proteins have been correlated with important phenomena such as bacterial infectivity, selective growth patterns or/and stress responses; nevertheless these few known roles are helping us understand the multiple ways by which prokaryotes can exploit these soluble blue‐light photoreceptors. Given the large number of sequences now deposited in databases, it becomes meaningful to define a signature for bona fide LOV domains, a procedure that facilitates identification of proteins with new properties and phylogenetic analysis. The latter clearly evidences that a class of LOV proteins from alpha‐proteobacteria is the closest prokaryotic relative of eukaryotic LOV domains, whereas cyanobacterial sequences cluster with the archaeal and the other bacterial LOV domains. Distance trees built for LOV domains suggest complex evolutionary patterns, possibly involving multiple horizontal gene transfer events. Based on available data, the in vivo relevance and evolution of prokaryotic LOV is discussed.     

Photoreactivation of UV-lnactivated Spores of Trichoderma harzianum

Abstract— Photoreactivation in the filamentous soil fungus Trichoderma harzianum is of interest because its blue, UVA photoreceptors (cryptochromes) may share homology with DNA photolyases. Furthermore, this organism antagonizes, by mycoparasitism, a number of soil-borne pathogens. Photoreactivation is thus important as one of the factors that may contribute to survival in the field. Exposure of asexually produced spores (conidia) to UVC inhibits germination. Nongerminating spores either do not swell or are inhibited later in germination, swelling but failing to put out a germ tube. Both types of inhibition can be reversed by photoreactivation with visible and UVA (320-400 nm) light, restoring high germination percentages. Conidia of mutants lacking the normal greenish pigmentation are more sensitive to UVC (200-280 nm) than wild-type conidia but photoreactivation still occurs. The action spectrum for photoreactivation indicates that T. harzianum has a DNA photolyase with a pterin as second chromophore. The most effective wavelengths for photoreactivation correspond to valleys, rather than peaks, in the action spectrum for photoinduction of sporulation. Furthermore, mutants with defects in photoinduction of sporulation ( dimY ) are not defective in photoreactivation. Induction of sporulation and DNA photorepair, while sharing parts of the blue/UVA spectrum, are different, by spectroscopic, kinetic and genetic criteria.     

Photolyase: Dynamics and Mechanisms of Repair of Sun‐Induced DNA Damage

Photolyase, a photomachine discovered half a century ago for repair of sun‐induced DNA damage of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs) and pyrimidine (6‐4) pyrimidone photoproducts (6‐4PPs), has been characterized extensively in biochemistry (function), structure and dynamics since 1980s. The molecular mechanism and repair photocycle have been revealed at the most fundamental level. Using femtosecond spectroscopy, we have mapped out the entire dynamical evolution and determined all actual timescales of the catalytic processes. Here, we review our recent efforts in studies of the dynamics of DNA repair by photolyases. The repair of CPDs in three life kingdoms includes seven electron transfer (ET) reactions among 10 elementary steps through initial bifurcating ET pathways, a direct tunneling route and a two‐step hopping path both through an intervening adenine from the cofactor to CPD, with a conserved folded structure at the active site. The repair of 6‐4PPs is challenging and requires similar ET reactions and a new cyclic proton transfer with a conserved histidine residue at the active site of (6‐4) photolyases. Finally, we also summarize our efforts on multiple intraprotein ET of photolyases in different redox states and such mechanistic studies are critical to the functional mechanism of homologous cryptochromes of blue‐light photoreceptors.