Series expansions of means

A mean M(u, v) is defined to be a homogeneous symmetric function of two positive real variables satisfying min(u, v) ? M(u, v) ? max(u, v) for all u and v. Setting M(u, v) = uM(1, vu^?1) = uM(1, 1 ? t), 0 ? t < 1, we determine power series expansions in t of various generalized means, including $\text{μ}{}_{\mathrm{p}}\text{(1, 1 ? t) = [}\text{1}\text{2}\text{+}\text{(1 ? t)}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{2}\text{]}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>p</mtext>}}\text{, m}{}_{\mathrm{p}}\text{(u, v) = [}\text{(v}{}^{\mathrm{p\; +\; 1}}\text{? u}{}^{\mathrm{p\; +\; 1}}\text{)}\text{(v ? u)(p + 1)}\text{]}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>p</mtext>}}$ (Stolarsky's mean), $\text{M}{}_{\mathrm{p}}\text{(u, v) =}\text{(u}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{+ v}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{)}\text{(u}{}^{\mathrm{p?\; 1}}\text{+ v}{}^{\mathrm{p\; ?\; 1}}\text{)}$ (Lehmer's mean), $\text{E(r, s; u, v) = [}\text{r(u}{}^{\mathrm{s}}\text{? v}{}^{\mathrm{s}}\text{)}\text{s(u}{}^{\mathrm{r}}\text{? v}{}^{\mathrm{r}}\text{)}\text{]}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>(s\; ?\; r)</mtext>}}$ (Leach and Sholander's mean), and $\text{G(r, s; u, v) = [}\text{(u}{}^{\mathrm{s}}\text{+ v}{}^{\mathrm{s}}\text{)}\text{(u}{}^{\mathrm{r}}\text{+ v}{}^{\mathrm{r}}\text{)}\text{]}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>(s\; ?\; r)</mtext>}}$ (Gini's mean). The explicit power series coefficients and recurrence relations for these coefficients are found. Finally, applications are shown by proving a theorem that generalizes one due to Lehmer.     

Uniform estimates for solutions of nonlinear Klein-Gordon equations

Uniform estimates in $\text{H}{}_0{}^1\text{(Ω)}$ of global solutions to nonlinear Klein-Gordon equations of the form $\text{u}{}_{\mathrm{tt}}\text{? Δu + mu = g(u)}\text{in}\text{Ω, u = 0}\text{in}\text{?Ω}$, where Ω is an open subset of $\text{R}$^N, m > 0, and g satisfies some growth conditions are established.     

Series inversion of some convolution transforms

We study degeneration for ? → + 0 of the two-point boundary value problems

$\text{τ?}{}^{\mathrm{\pm }}\text{u := ?((au′)′ + bu′ + cu) ± xu′ ? κu = h, u(±1) = A ± B}$

, and convergence of the operators T_?⁺ and T_?^? on $\text{L}$²(?1, 1) connected with them, T_?^±u := τ_?^±u for all

$\text{u?D(T}{}_{\mathrm{?}}{}^{\mathrm{\pm }}\text{, D(T}{}_{\mathrm{?}}{}^{\mathrm{\pm }}\text{) := {u ? L}{}^2\text{(?1, 1) ∣ u″ ? L}{}^2\text{(?1, 1) \&; u(?1) = u(1) = O}, T}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{u: = xu′}$

for all

$\text{u?D(T}{}_{\mathrm{O}}{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{), D(T}{}_{\mathrm{O}}{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{) := {u ? L}{}^2\text{(?1, 1) ∣ xu′ ? L}{}^2\text{(?1, 1) \&; u(?1) = u(1) = O}}$

. Here ? is a small positive parameter, λ a complex “spectral” parameter; a, b and c are real $\text{b}$^∞-functions, a(x) ? γ > 0 for all x? [?1, 1] and h is a sufficiently smooth complex function. We prove that the limits of the eigenvalues of T_?⁺ and of T_?^? are the negative and nonpositive integers respectively by comparison of the general case to the special case in which a  1 and b  c  0 and in which we can compute the limits exactly. We show that (T_?⁺ ? λ)^?1 converges for ? → +0 strongly to (T₀⁺ ? λ)^?1 if $\text{R e λ > ?}\text{1}\text{2}$. In an analogous way, we define the operator T_?⁺, n (n ? $\text{N}$ in the Sobolev space H₀^?n(? 1, 1) as a restriction of τ_?⁺ and prove strong convergence of (T⁺_?,n ? λ)^?1 for ? → +0 in this space of distributions if $\text{R e λ > ?n ?}\text{1}\text{2}$. With aid of the maximum principle we infer from this that, if h?$\text{C}$¹, the solution of τ_?⁺u ? λu = h, u(±1) = A ± B converges for ? → +0 uniformly on [?1, ? ?] ∪ [?, 1] to the solution of xu′ ? λu = h, u(±1) = A ± B for each p > 0 and for each λ ? $\text{C}$ if ? ?$\text{N}$.Finally we prove by duality that the solution of τ_?^?u ? λu = h converges to a definite solution of the reduced equation uniformly on each compact subset of (?1, 0) ∪ (0, 1) if h is sufficiently smooth and if 1 ? ?$\text{N}$.     

Sur les équations de Lane–Emden avec opérateurs non linéaires

In this Note we consider nonnegative solutions for the nonlinear equation

$\text{M}{}^{\mathrm{+}}{}_{\mathrm{\lambda ,\Lambda }}\text{D}{}^2\text{u}\text{+|x|}{}^{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{u}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{=0}$

in $\text{R}{}^{\mathrm{N}}$, where $\text{M}{}^{\mathrm{+}}{}_{\mathrm{\lambda ,\Lambda }}\text{(D}{}^2\text{u)}$ is the so called Pucci operator

$\text{M}{}^{\mathrm{+}}{}_{\mathrm{\lambda ,\Lambda }}\text{(M)=λ}\text{∑}\text{e}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{<0}\text{e}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{+Λ}\text{∑}\text{e}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{>0}\text{e}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{,}$

and the e_i are the eigenvalues of M et Λ?λ>0. We prove that if u satisfies the decreasing estimate

$\text{lim}\text{|x|→+∞}\text{|x|}{}^{\mathrm{\beta ?1}}\text{u(x)=0}$

for some β satisfying (β?1)(p?1)>2+α then u is radial. In a second time we prove that if $\text{p<}\text{N+2α+2}\text{N?2}$ and u is a nonnegative radial solution of (1), u(x)=g(r), such that g″ changes sign at most once, then u is zero. To cite this article: I. Birindelli, F. Demengel, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Ser. I 336 (2003).     

Square roots of elliptic operators

Consider an elliptic sesquilinear form defined on $\text{V}$ × $\text{V}$ by $\text{J[u, v] = ∫}{}_{\mathrm{\Omega }}\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{jk}}\text{?u}\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{}\text{?}\text{t6v}\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{+ a}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{?u}\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{v}\text{?}\text{+ α}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{u}\text{}\text{?}\text{t6v}\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{+ au}\text{v}\text{?}\text{dx}$, where $\text{V}$ is a closed subspace of $\text{H}{}^1\text{(Ω)}$ which contains $\text{C}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{(Ω)}$, Ω is a bounded Lipschitz domain in $\text{R}$ⁿ, $\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{jk}}\text{, a}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{, α}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{, a ? L}{}_{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{(Ω),}\text{and Re}\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{jk}}\text{ζ}{}_{\mathrm{k}}\text{ζ}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{? κ > 0}$ for all ζ?$\text{C}$ⁿ with ¦ζ¦ = 1. Let L be the operator with largest domain satisfying J[u, v] = (Lu, v) for all υ∈$\text{V}$. Then L + λI is a maximal accretive operator in $\text{L}{}_2\text{(Ω)}$ for λ a sufficiently large real number. It is proved that $\text{(L + λI)}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}$ is a bounded operator from $\text{V}$ to $\text{L}{}_2\text{(Ω)}$ provided mild regularity of the coefficients is assumed. In addition it is shown that if the coefficients depend differentiably on a parameter t in an appropriate sense, then the corresponding square root operators also depend differentiably on t. The latter result is new even when the forms J are hermitian.     

Asymptotic behavior for an almost periodic,strongly dissipative wave equation

This paper deals with asymptotic behavior for (weak) solutions of the equation $\text{u}{}_{\mathrm{tt}}\text{? Δu + β(u}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{) ? ?(t, x)}$, on $\text{R}$⁺ × Ω; u(t, x) = 0, on $\text{R}$⁺ × ?Ω. If $\text{?∈L∞(R}{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{,L}{}^2\text{(Ω))}$ and β is coercive, we prove that the solutions are bounded in the energy space, under weaker assumptions than those used by G. Prouse in a previous work. If in addition $\text{?}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{∈S}{}^2\text{(R}{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{,L}{}^2\text{(Ω))}$ and ? is srongly almost-periodic, we prove for strongly monotone β that all solutions are asymptotically almost-periodic in the energy space. The assumptions made on β are much less restrictive than those made by G. Prouse: mainly, we allow β to be multivalued, and in the one-dimensional case β need not be defined everywhere.     

Convergence of the Kato approximants for evolution equations involving functional perturbations

The existence of a unique strong solution of the nonlinear abstract functional differential equation $\text{u′(t) + A(t)u(t) = F(t,u}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{), u}{}_0\text{= φεC}{}^1\text{(¦?r,0¦,X),tε¦0, T¦}$, (E) is established. X is a Banach space with uniformly convex dual space and, for $\text{t? ¦0, T¦, A(t)}$ is m-accretive and satisfies a time dependence condition suitable for applications to partial differential equations. The function F satisfies a Lipschitz condition. The novelty of the paper is that the solution u(t) of (E) is shown to be the uniform limit (as n → ∞) of the sequence u_n(t), where the functions u_n(t) are continuously differentiate solutions of approximating equations involving the Yosida approximants. Thus, a straightforward approximation scheme is now available for such equations, in parallel with the approach involving the use of nonlinear evolution operator theory.     

Some asymptotic boundary behavior of solutions of non-linear parabolic initial-boundary value problems

For parabolic initial boundary value problems various results such as $\text{lim}{}_{\mathrm{t\; \downarrow \; 0}}\text{{}\text{(}\text{?u}\text{t6x}\text{)(0, t)}\text{(}\text{?u}{}_{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{?x}\text{)(0, t)}}\text{= 1}$, where u satisfies $\text{?u}\text{?t}\text{= a(u)(}\text{?}{}^2\text{u}\text{?x}{}^2\text{), 0 < x < 1, 0 < t ? T, u(x, 0) = 0, u(0, t) = |}{}_1\text{(t), 0 < t ? T, u(1, t) = |}{}_2\text{(t), 0 < t ? T, u}{}_{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{satisfies}\text{(}\text{?u}{}_{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{?t}\text{) = α(}\text{?}{}^2\text{u}{}_{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{?x}{}^2\text{), 0 < x < 1, 0 < t ? T, u}{}_{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{(x, 0) = 0, u}{}_{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{(0, t) = |}{}_1\text{(t), 0 < t ? T, u}{}_{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{(1, t) = |}{}_2\text{(t), 0 < t ? T,}\text{and}\text{α = a(0)}$, are demonstrated via the maximum principle and potential theoretic estimates.     

Cardinal interpolation and spline fucntions V. The B-splines for cardinal Hermite interpolation

In the third paper of this series on cardinal spline interpolation [4] Lipow and Schoenberg study the problem of Hermite interpolation

$\text{S(v) = Y}{}_{\mathrm{v}}\text{, S′(v) = Y}{}_{\mathrm{v}}\text{′,…,S}{}^{\mathrm{(r?1)}}\text{(v) = Y}{}_{\mathrm{v}}{}^{\mathrm{(r?1)}}\text{for all}\text{v}$

. The B-splines are there conspicuous by their absence, although they were found very useful for the case γ = 1 of ordinary (or Lagrange) interpolation (see [5–10]). The purpose of the present paper is to investigate the B-splines for the case of Hermite interpolation (γ > 1). In this sense the present paper is a supplement to [4] and is based on its results. This is done in Part I. Part II is devoted to the special case when we want to solve the problem

$\text{S(v) = Y}{}_{\mathrm{v}}\text{, S′(v) = Y}{}_{\mathrm{v}}\text{′}\text{for all}\text{v}$

by quintic spline functions of the class C?(– ∞, ∞). This is the simplest nontrivial example for the general theory. In Part II we derive an explicit solution for the problem (1), where v = 0, 1,…, n.     

Global existence for a delay differential equation

An elastic-plastic bar with simply connected cross section Q is clamped at the bottom and given a twist at the top. The stress function u, at a prescribed cross section, is then the solution of the variational inequality (0.1) $\text{min}{}_{\mathrm{<mtext>v</mtext><mtext>?</mtext><mtext>K</mtext>}}\text{{∝}{}_{\mathrm{Q}}\text{¦}\text{▽}\text{v¦}{}^2\text{? 2θ}{}_1\text{∝}{}_{\mathrm{Q}}\text{v} = ∝}{}_{\mathrm{Q}}\text{¦}\text{▽}\text{u¦}{}^2\text{? 2θ}{}_1\text{∝}{}_{\mathrm{Q}}\text{u, u}\text{?}\text{K,}\text{where}\text{(0.2) K = {v}\text{?}\text{H}{}_0{}^1\text{(Q), ¦}\text{▽}\text{v¦ ? 1}\text{a.e.}\text{}}\text{and}\text{θ}{}_1$ is equal to the angle of the twist (after normalizing the units). Introducing the Lagrange multiplier λ_θ1, the unloading problem consists in solving the variational inequality (0.3) is the twisting angle for the unloaded bar; θ₂ < θ₁. Let (0.4) $\text{K}{}^1\text{= {v}\text{?}\text{H}{}_0{}^1\text{(Q), ?d(x) ? v(x) ? d(x)},}\text{where}\text{d(x) =}\text{dist}\text{.(x, ?Q)}$, and denote by $\text{u}{}^1\text{, w}{}^1$ the solutions of (0.1), (0.3), respectively, when K is replaced by $\text{K}{}^1$. The following results are well known for the loading problem (0.1):(0.5) $\text{u = u}{}^1$; (0.6) the plastic set $\text{P = (X}\text{?}\text{Q}\text{?}\text{; ¦}\text{▽}\text{u(x)¦ = 1}}$ is connected to the boundary. In this paper we show that, in general, (0.7) $\text{w ≠ w}{}^1$; (0.8) the plastic set $\text{P}\text{?}\text{= {x}\text{?}\text{Q}\text{?}\text{; ¦}\text{▽}\text{w(x)¦ = 1}}$ is not connected to the boundary. That is, we construct domains Q for which (0.7) and (0.8) hold for a suitable choice of θ₁, θ₂.     

Lp estimates for the wave equation

Let u(x, t) be the solution of u_tt ? Δ_xu = 0 with initial conditions $\text{u(x, 0) = g(x)}\text{and}\text{u}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{(x, 0) = ?;(x)}$. Consider the linear operator $\text{T: ?; → u(x, t)}$. (Here g = 0.) We prove for t fixed the following result. Theorem 1: T is bounded in L^p if and only if . Theorem 2: If the coefficients are variables in C and constant outside of some compact set we get: (a) If n = 2k the result holds for $\text{¦ p}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{? 2}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{¦ < (n ? 1)}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}$. (b) If n = 2k ? 1, the result is valid for $\text{¦ p}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{? 2}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{¦ ? (n ? 1)}$. This result are sharp in the sense that for p such that $\text{¦ p}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{? 2}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}\text{¦ > (n ? 1)}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}$ we prove the existence of $\text{?; ? L}{}^{\mathrm{P}}$ in such a way that $\text{T?; ? L}{}^{\mathrm{P}}$. Several applications are given, one of them is to the study of the Klein-Gordon equation, the other to the completion of the study of the family of multipliers $\text{m(ξ) = ψ(ξ) e}{}^{\mathrm{i¦\xi ¦}}\text{¦ ξ ¦}{}^{\mathrm{?b}}$ and finally we get that the convolution against the kernel $\text{K(x) = ?(x)(1 ? ¦ x ¦)}{}^{\mathrm{?1}}$ is bounded in H¹.     

On maximum principles for a class of nonlinear second-order elliptic equations

In a recent paper [3] the authors derived maximum principles which involved $\text{u(x)}\text{and}\text{q = ¦}\text{grad}\text{u¦}$, where u(x) is a classical solution of an alliptic differential equation of the form ($\text{g(q}{}^2\text{)u}{}_{\mathrm{,i}}\text{)}{}_{\mathrm{,i}}\text{+ ?(u) ?(q}{}^2\text{) = 0}$. In this paper these results are extended to the more general case in which $\text{g = g(u, q}{}^2\text{)}\text{and}\text{?(u) ?(q}{}^2\text{)}$ is replaced by h(u, q²).     

Null Lagrangians,weak continuity,and variational problems of arbitrary order

We consider the problem of minimizing integral functionals of the form $\text{I(u) = ∝}{}_{\mathrm{\Omega }}\text{F(x, ▽}{}^{\mathrm{[k]}}\text{u(x)) dx}$, where Ω ?$\text{R}$^p, u:ω →$\text{R}$ and ▽^[k]u denotes the set of all partial derivatives of u with orders ?k. The method is based on a characterization of null Lagrangians L(▽^ku) depending only on derivatives of order k. Applications to elasticity and other theories of mechanics are given.     

Uniqueness of solutions of nonlinear Dirichlet problems

In this paper, we consider the uniqueness of radial solutions of the nonlinear Dirichlet problem $\text{Δu + ?(u) = 0}\text{in}\text{Ω}\text{with}\text{u = 0}\text{on}\text{?Ω,}\text{where}\text{Δ = ∑}{}_{\mathrm{i\; =\; 1}}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{?}{}^2\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{i}}{}^2\text{,?}$ satisfies some appropriate conditions and Ω is a bounded smooth domain in $\text{R}$ⁿ which possesses radial symmetry. Our uniqueness results apply to, for instance, $\text{?(u) = u}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{, p > 1}$, or more generally λu + ∑_{i = 1}^ka_iu^pi, λ ? 0, a_i > 0 and p_i > 1 with appropriate upper bounds, and Ω a ball or an annulus.     

On Lp estimates for the wave equation

New and more elementary proofs are given of two results due to W. Littman: (1) Let $\text{n ? 2, p ?}\text{2n}\text{(n ? 1)}$. The estimate $\text{∫∫ (¦▽u¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{+ ¦u}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{) dx dt ? C ∫∫ ¦□u¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{dx dt}$ cannot hold for all u?C₀^∞(Q), Q a cube in $\text{R}{}^{\mathrm{<mi\; mathvariant="italic"\; is="true">n</mi>}}\text{× R}$, some constant C. (2) Let n ? 2, p ≠ 2. The estimate $\text{∫ (¦▽(t)¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{+ ¦u}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{(t)¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{) dx ? C(t) ∫ (¦▽u(0)¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{+ ¦u}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{(0)¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{) dx}$ cannot hold for all C^∞ solutions of the wave equation □u = 0 in $\text{R}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{x R}$; all t ?$\text{R}$; some function C: $\text{R}$ → $\text{R}$.     

Instability of certain traveling wave solutions to the Fitz Hugh-Nagumo Nerve Axon equations

A study is made of the existence and stability of certain traveling wave solutions to the Fitz Hugh-Nagumo system $\text{?u}\text{?t}\text{=}\text{?}{}^2\text{u}\text{?x}{}^2\text{+ u(u ? a)(1 ? u) ? v,}\text{?v}\text{?t}\text{= bu}$. In particular it is shown that for the wave speed c sufficiently small such waves are unstable in the temporal linearized sense. The study complements recent work of J. M. Greenberg and D. A. Larson.     

Superexponential decay of solutions of a semilinear wave equation

Consider a smooth solution of $\text{u}{}_{\mathrm{tt}}\text{? Δu + q(x) ¦ u ¦}{}^{\mathrm{p?1}}\text{u = 0 x ? R}{}^3\text{, q ? 0}$ and is C¹, and 1 < p < 5. Assume that the initial data decay sufficiently rapidly at infinity, $\text{q(x) ? a}\text{exp}\text{(?b ¦ x ¦}{}^{\mathrm{c}}\text{), a, b > 0, c > 1}$, and for simplicity, q_r ? 0. Then the local energy decays faster than exponentially.