Some asymptotic boundary behavior of solutions of non-linear parabolic initial-boundary value problems

For parabolic initial boundary value problems various results such as $\text{lim}{}_{\mathrm{t\; \downarrow \; 0}}\text{{}\text{(}\text{?u}\text{t6x}\text{)(0, t)}\text{(}\text{?u}{}_{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{?x}\text{)(0, t)}}\text{= 1}$, where u satisfies $\text{?u}\text{?t}\text{= a(u)(}\text{?}{}^2\text{u}\text{?x}{}^2\text{), 0 < x < 1, 0 < t ? T, u(x, 0) = 0, u(0, t) = |}{}_1\text{(t), 0 < t ? T, u(1, t) = |}{}_2\text{(t), 0 < t ? T, u}{}_{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{satisfies}\text{(}\text{?u}{}_{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{?t}\text{) = α(}\text{?}{}^2\text{u}{}_{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{?x}{}^2\text{), 0 < x < 1, 0 < t ? T, u}{}_{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{(x, 0) = 0, u}{}_{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{(0, t) = |}{}_1\text{(t), 0 < t ? T, u}{}_{\mathrm{\alpha }}\text{(1, t) = |}{}_2\text{(t), 0 < t ? T,}\text{and}\text{α = a(0)}$, are demonstrated via the maximum principle and potential theoretic estimates.     

Weak solutions for a nonlinear dispersive equation

In this paper we study the existence, uniqueness, and regularity of the solutions for the Cauchy problem for the evolution equation $\text{u}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{+ (f (u))}{}_{\mathrm{x}}\text{? u}{}_{\mathrm{xxt}}\text{= g(x, t), (}{}^1\text{)}\text{where}\text{u = u(x, t), x}$ is in (0, 1), 0 ? t ? T, T is an arbitrary positive real number,f(s)?C¹$\text{R}$, and g(x, t)?L^∞(0, T; L²(0, 1)). We prove the existence and uniqueness of the weak solutions for (¹) using the Galerkin method and a compactness argument such as that of J. L. Lions. We obtain regular solutions using eigenfunctions of the one-dimensional Laplace operator as a basis in the Galerkin method.     

A comparison of different compactness notions in fuzzy topological spaces

Starting from a defining differential equation $\text{(}\text{?}\text{?t}\text{) W(λ, t, u) = (}\text{λ(u ? t)}\text{p(t)}\text{) W(λ, t, u)}$ of the kernel of an exponential operator $\text{S}{}_{\mathrm{\lambda }}\text{(?, t) = ∫}{}_{\mathrm{?\infty }}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{W(λ, t, u)?(u) du}$ with normalization ∫_?∞^∞W(λ, t, u) du = 1, we determine S_λ for various p(t) including; for example, p(t) a quadratic polynomial, all the known exponential operators are recovered and some new ones are constructed. It is shown that all the exponential operators are approximation operators. Further approximation properties of these operators are discussed. For example, functions satisfying $\text{∥ S}{}_{\mathrm{\lambda }}\text{(?, t) ? ?(t)∥ = O(λ}{}^{\mathrm{?\alpha }}\text{)}$ are characterized. Several results of C. P. May are also improved.     

Numerical solution of a nonlinear integro-differential equation

Galerkin's method with appropriate discretization in time is considered for approximating the solution of the nonlinear integro-differential equation $\text{u}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{(x, t) = ∝}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{t}}\text{a(t ? τ)}\text{?}\text{?x}\text{σ(u}{}_{\mathrm{x}}\text{(x, τ)) dτ + f(x, t)}$, 0 < x < 1, 0 < t < T.An error estimate in a suitable norm will be derived for the difference u ? u^h between the exact solution u and the approximant u^h. It turns out that the rate of convergence of u^h to u as h → 0 is optimal. This result was confirmed by the numerical experiments.     

A constructive approach to the solution of a class of boundary value problems of mixed type

In this article we discuss the solution of boundary value problems which are described by the linear integrodifferential equation $\text{?xu}\text{?t}\text{(t, x) + u(t, x) ?}\text{1}\text{π}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}\text{∝}{}_{\mathrm{?\infty }}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{exp}\text{(?y}{}^2\text{) u(t, y) dy = 0}$, where t∈J?$\text{R}$, x∈$\text{R}$. We interpret the equation in functional form as an ordinary differential equation for the mapping u:J→L₂(R,μ), where L₂(R,μ) is a weighted L₂-space. Emphasis is on the constructive aspects of the solution and on finding representations of the relevant isomorphisms.     

The number of positive integers ≤x and free of prime factors >y

The number defined by the title is denoted by Ψ(x, y). Let $\text{u =}\text{log}\text{x}\text{log}\text{y}$ and let ?(u) be the function determined by ?(u) = 1, 0 ≤ u ≤ 1, u?′(u) = ? ?(u ? 1), u > 1. We prove the following:Theorem. For x sufficiently large and log y ≥ (log log x)², Ψ(x,y) ? x?(u) while for 1 + log log x ≤ log y ≤ (log log x)², and ε > 0, $\text{Ψ(x, y) ?}{}_{\mathrm{\epsilon }}\text{x?(u)}\text{exp}\text{(?u e}\text{xp}\text{(?(}\text{log}\text{y)}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>(</mtext><mtext>3</mtext><mtext>5</mtext><mtext>\; ?\; \epsilon )</mtext>}}\text{))}$.The proof uses a weighted lower approximation to Ψ(x, y), a reinterpretation of this sum in probability terminology, and ultimately large-deviation methods plus the Berry-Esseen theorem.     

Asymptotic stability of some quasilinear parabolic equations in divergence form. L∞ results

In this paper we study the behavior of solutions of some quasilinear parabolic equations of the form

$\text{(}\text{?u}\text{?t}\text{) ?}\text{∑}\text{i=1}\text{n}\text{(}\text{d}\text{dx}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{) a}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(x, t, u, u}{}_{\mathrm{x}}\text{) + a(x, t, u, u}{}_{\mathrm{x}}\text{)u + f(x, t) = O,}$

as t → ∞. In particular, the solutions of these equations will decay to zero as t → ∞ in the L^∞ norm.     

Concrete model theory for a class of operators with unitary part

Let m and v_t, 0 ? t ? 2π be measures on T = [0, 2π] with m smooth. Consider the direct integral $\text{H}$ = ⊕L²(v^t) dm(t) and the operator $\text{(L?)(t, λ) = e}{}^{\mathrm{?i\lambda }}\text{?(t, λ) ? 2e}{}^{\mathrm{?i\lambda }}\text{∫}{}_{\mathrm{t}}{}^{\mathrm{2\pi }}\text{∫}{}_{\mathrm{T}}\text{?(s, x) e(s, t) dv}{}_{\mathrm{s}}\text{(x) dm(s)}$ on $\text{H}$, where e(s, t) = exp ∫_s^t ∫_Tdv_λ(θ) dm(λ). Let μ_t be the measure defined by $\text{∫}{}_{\mathrm{T}}\text{?(x) dμ}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{(x) = ∫}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{t}}\text{∫}{}_{\mathrm{T}}\text{?(x) dv}{}_{\mathrm{s}}\text{dm(s)}$ for all continuous ?, and let ?_t(z) = exp[?∫ (e^iθ + z)(e^iθ ? z)^?1dμ_t(gq)]. Call {v_t} regular iff for all $\text{t, ¦?}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{(e}{}^{\mathrm{i\theta }}\text{)¦ = ¦?}{}_{\mathrm{2\pi }}\text{(e}{}^{\mathrm{i\theta }}\text{)¦}$ for 1 a.e.     

Arnold's canonical matrices and the asymptotic simplification of ordinary differential equations

Let A(x,ε) be an n×n matrix function holomorphic for |x|?x₀, 0<ε?ε₀, and possessing, uniformly in x, an asymptotic expansion $\text{A(x,ε)?Σ}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}{}_{\mathrm{r=0}}\text{A}{}_{\mathrm{r}}\text{(x) ε}{}^{\mathrm{r}}$, as ε→0⁺. An invertible, holomorphic matrix function P(x,ε) with an asymptotic expansion $\text{P(x,ε)?Σ}{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}{}_{\mathrm{r=0}}\text{P}{}_{\mathrm{r}}\text{(x)ε}{}^{\mathrm{r}}$, as ε→0⁺, is constructed, such that the transformation y = P(x,ε)z takes the differential equation $\text{ε}{}^{\mathrm{h}}\text{dy}\text{dx}\text{= A(x,ε)y,h}$ a positive integer, into $\text{ε}{}^{\mathrm{h}}\text{dz}\text{dx}\text{= B(x,ε)z}$, where B(x,ε) is asymptotically equal, to all orders, to a matrix in a canonical form for holomorphic matrices due to V.I. Arnold.     

On Lp estimates for the wave equation

New and more elementary proofs are given of two results due to W. Littman: (1) Let $\text{n ? 2, p ?}\text{2n}\text{(n ? 1)}$. The estimate $\text{∫∫ (¦▽u¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{+ ¦u}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{) dx dt ? C ∫∫ ¦□u¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{dx dt}$ cannot hold for all u?C₀^∞(Q), Q a cube in $\text{R}{}^{\mathrm{<mi\; mathvariant="italic"\; is="true">n</mi>}}\text{× R}$, some constant C. (2) Let n ? 2, p ≠ 2. The estimate $\text{∫ (¦▽(t)¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{+ ¦u}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{(t)¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{) dx ? C(t) ∫ (¦▽u(0)¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{+ ¦u}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{(0)¦}{}^{\mathrm{p}}\text{) dx}$ cannot hold for all C^∞ solutions of the wave equation □u = 0 in $\text{R}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{x R}$; all t ?$\text{R}$; some function C: $\text{R}$ → $\text{R}$.     

Asymptotic properties of general symmetric hyperbolic systems

Results on partition of energy and on energy decay are derived for solutions of the Cauchy problem $\text{?u}\text{?t}\text{+ ∑}{}_{\mathrm{j\; =\; 1}}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{A}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{?u}\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{= 0, u(0, x) = ?(x)}$. Here the A_j's are constant, k × k Hermitian matrices, x = (x₁,…, x_n), t represents time, and u = u(t, x) is a k-vector. It is shown that the energy of Mu approaches a limit $\text{E}{}_{\mathrm{M}}\text{(?)}\text{as}\text{¦ t ¦ → ∞}$, where M is an arbitrary matrix; that there exists a sufficiently large subspace of data ?, which is invariant under the solution group U₀(t) and such that $\text{U}{}_0\text{(t)? = 0}\text{for}\text{¦ x ¦ ? a ¦ t ¦ ? R, a}\text{and}\text{R}$ depending on ? and that the local energy of nonstatic solutions decays as $\text{¦ t ¦ → ∞}$. More refined results on energy decay are also given and the existence of wave operators is established, considering a perturbed equation $\text{E(x)}\text{?u}\text{?t}\text{+ ∑}{}_{\mathrm{j\; =\; 1}}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{A}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{?u}\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{= 0,}\text{where}\text{¦ E(x) ? I ¦ = O(¦ x ¦}{}^{\mathrm{?1\; ?\; ?}}\text{)}$ at infinity.     

Radiation conditions and uniqueness theorem for n-dimensional wave equation in an infinite domain

The present work is intended to be a comprehensive and systematic treatment of the “radiation condition” (a particular case being Sommerfeld's radiation condition) which guarantees the uniqueness of the solution of the exterior boundary value problems for the second-order linear elliptic differential equation (which one can also consider as the reduced general wave equation)

$\text{L(u) =}\text{Σ}\text{i,j=1}\text{n}\text{a}{}_{\mathrm{ij}}\text{(x)}\text{?}{}^2\text{u}\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{j}}\text{+}\text{∫}\text{i=1}\text{n}\text{b}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(x)}\text{?u}\text{?x}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{+ c(x)u = 0}$

in n-dimensional Euclidean space E_n. First of all, Sobolev's integral formula is generalized. This is accomplished by means of the concept of retarded argument and auxiliary functions σ_n and τ (in an appendix). Furthermore, some additional restrictions are imposed on σ_n and τ. Second, using this generalized integral formula, conditions which are a generalization of the classical Sommerfeld's radiation condition are found. Then the maximum principle for the solution in an unbounded domain is stated which finally leads to the uniqueness theorem for the exterior boundary value problem. Special cases of (A) such as Δu + k²u = 0 and Δu + k²(x)u = 0 can also be deduced.     

The sum of aΩ(n) over integers n ≤ x with all prime factors between a and y

For a > 0 let $\text{ψ}{}_{\mathrm{a}}\text{(x, y) =}\text{Σ}\text{a}{}^{\mathrm{\Omega (n)}}$, the sum taken over all n, 1 ≤ n ≤ x such that if p is prime and p|n then a < p ≤ y. It is shown for u < about ($\text{log log}\text{x}\text{log log log}\text{x}$) that $\text{ψ}{}_{\mathrm{a}}\text{(x, x}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>u</mtext>}}\text{) ? x(}\text{log}\text{x)}{}^{\mathrm{a?1}}\text{p}{}_{\mathrm{a}}\text{(u)}$, where p_a(u) solves a delay differential equation much like that for the Dickman function p(u), and the asymptotic behavior of p_a(u) is worked out.     

The existence,uniqueness, and instability of spherically symmetric solutions of a system of reaction—Diffusion equations

The system $\text{?x}\text{?t}\text{= Δx + F(x,y),}\text{?y}\text{?t}\text{= G(x,y)}$ is investigated, where x and y are scalar functions of time (t ? 0), and n space variables $\text{(ξ}{}_1\text{,…, ξ}{}_{\mathrm{n}}\text{), Δx ≡ ∑}{}_{\mathrm{i\; =\; 1}}{}^{\mathrm{n}}\text{?}{}^2\text{x}\text{?ξ}{}_{\mathrm{i}}{}^2$, and F and G are nonlinear functions. Under certain hypotheses on F and G it is proved that there exists a unique spherically symmetric solution $\text{(x(r),y(r)),}\text{where}\text{r = (ξ}{}_1{}^2\text{+ … + ξ}{}_{\mathrm{n}}{}^2\text{)}{}^{\mathrm{<mtext>1</mtext><mtext>2</mtext>}}$, which is bounded for r ? 0 and satisfies x(0) >x₀, y(0) > y₀, x′(0) = 0, y′(0) = 0, and x′ < 0, y′ > 0, ?r > 0. Thus, (x(r), y(r)) represents a time independent equilibrium solution of the system. Further, the linearization of the system restricted to spherically symmetric solutions, around (x(r), y(r)), has a unique positive eigenvalue. This is in contrast to the case n = 1 (i.e., one space dimension) in which zero is an eigenvalue. The uniqueness of the positive eigenvalue is used in the proof that the spherically symmetric solution described is unique.     

Finite differences versus finite elements for solving nonlinear integro-differential equations

Consider the nonlinear integro-differential equation $\text{u}{}_{\mathrm{t}}\text{(x, t) = ∝}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{t}}\text{a(t?τ)}\text{?}\text{?x}\text{σ(u}{}_{\mathrm{x}}\text{(x, τ)) dτ + f(x, t)}$, 0 < x <, 0 < t < T, with appropriate initial and boundary conditions. This problem serves as a model for one-dimensional heat flow in materials with memory. The numerical solution via finite elements was discussed in B. Neta [J. Math. Anal. Appl.89 (1982), 598–611]. In this paper we compare the results obtained there with finite difference approximation from the point of view of accuracy and computer storage. It turns out that the finite difference method yields comparable results for the same mesh spacing using less computer storage.     

An abstract nonlinear Volterra integrodifferential equation

We study the nonlinear Volterra equation $\text{u′(t) + Bu(t) + ∫}{}_0{}^{\mathrm{t}}\text{a(t ? s) Au(s) ds ? F(t) (0 < t < ∞) (′ =}\text{d}\text{dt}\text{), u(0) = u}{}_0$, (¹) as well as the corresponding problem with infinite delay $\text{u′(t) + Bu(t) + ∫}{}_{\mathrm{?\infty }}{}^{\mathrm{t}}\text{a(t ? s) Au(s) ds ? ?(t) (0 < t < ∞), u(t) = h(t) (?∞ < t ? 0)}$. (⁷) Under various assumptions on the nonlinear operators A, B and on the given functions a, F, f, h existence theorems are obtained for (¹) and (⁷, followed by results concerning boundedness and asymptotic behaviour of solutions on (0 ? < ∞); two applications of the theory to problems of nonlinear heat flow with “infinite memory” are also discussed.     

Stability conditions for linear retarded functional differential equations

The purpose of this note is to study the exponential stability for the linear retarded functional differential equation $\text{x}\text{?}\text{(t) = ∫}{}_{\mathrm{?1}}{}^0\text{[dη(θ)] x(t ? r(θ))}$, where the delay function r(θ) ? 0 is continuous and η(θ) is of bounded variation on the interval [?1, 0]. It is shown that the spectral limit function for the equation above has a continuous dependence on the pair (η, r). The set of all functions of bounded variation η for which the equation above is exponentially stable for every delay function r, the so-called region of stability globally in the delays, is a cone. Therefore for a fixed r, the set of all η which make our equation exponentially stable, that is, the region of stability for the delay function r, contains a cone. A discussion of the characterization of these regions of stability, as well as of the largest cone contained in each region of stability for a fixed delay function r, is given. Some remarks are made with respect to a similar question for the equation $\text{x}\text{?}\text{(t) = Ax(t) + ∫}{}_{\mathrm{?\; 1}}{}^0\text{[dμ(θ)] x(t?r(θ))}$, where A is a real n by n matrix, μ(θ) is bounded variation on [?1, 0] and r(θ) as before. Several examples illustrate the results obtained.     

Sublinear perturbations of the differential equation y(n) = 0 and of the analogous difference equation

According to a result of A. Ghizzetti, for any solution y(t) of the differential equation where $\text{y}{}^{\mathrm{(n)}}\text{(t)+}\text{∑}\text{i=0}\text{n?1}\text{g}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(t) y}{}^{\mathrm{i}}\text{(t)=0}\text{(t ? 1)}$, $\text{∝}{}_1{}^{\mathrm{\infty }}\text{¦g}{}_{\mathrm{i}}\text{(x)¦x}{}^{\mathrm{n?I?1}}\text{dx < ∞}$ (0 ?i ? n ?1, either y(t) = 0 for t ? 1 or there is an integer r with 0 ? r ? n ? 1 such that $\text{lim}\text{t → ∞}\text{y(t)}\text{t}{}^{\mathrm{r}}$ exists and ≠0. Related results are obtained for difference and differential inequalities. A special case of the former has interesting applications in the study of orthogonal polynomials.     

Propagation of chaos for pressureless gas equations with viscosityPropagation du chaos pour un système de gaz sans pression avec viscosité

We use A.S. Sznitman ideas of probabilistic phenomenon of propagation of chaos for Burgers equation, and we derive the existence and uniqueness of a weak solution of the following system of pressureless gas equations with viscosity:

$\text{(}\text{S}\text{)}\text{?}\text{?t}\text{ρ+}\text{?}\text{?x}\text{(uρ)=}\text{1}\text{2}\text{?}{}^2\text{?}{}^2\text{x}\text{ρ,}\text{?}\text{?t}\text{(uρ)+}\text{?}\text{?x}\text{(u}{}^2\text{ρ)=}\text{1}\text{2}\text{?}{}^2\text{?}{}^2\text{x}\text{(uρ),}\text{ρ(}\text{d}\text{x,t)→ρ(}\text{d}\text{x,0),u(x,t)ρ(}\text{d}\text{x,t)→u}{}_0\text{(x)ρ(}\text{d}\text{x,0)}\text{weakly as}\text{t→0}{}^{\mathrm{+}}\text{.}$

To cite this article: A. Dermoune, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Ser. I 335 (2002) 935–940.