Speech recognition and the Articulation Index for normal and hearing-impaired listeners

The purpose of this experiment was to determine the applicability of the Articulation Index (AI) model for characterizing the speech recognition performance of listeners with mild-to-moderate hearing loss. Performance-intensity functions were obtained from five normal-hearing listeners and 11 hearing-impaired listeners using a closed-set nonsense syllable test for two frequency responses (uniform and high-frequency emphasis). For each listener, the fitting constant Q of the nonlinear transfer function relating AI and speech recognition was estimated. Results indicated that the function mapping AI onto performance was approximately the same for normal and hearing-impaired listeners with mild-to-moderate hearing loss and high speech recognition scores. For a hearing-impaired listener with poor speech recognition ability, the AI procedure was a poor predictor of performance. The AI procedure as presently used is inadequate for predicting performance of individuals with reduced speech recognition ability and should be used conservatively in applications predicting optimal or acceptable frequency response characteristics for hearing-aid amplification systems.     

Stop-consonant recognition for normal-hearing listeners and listeners with high-frequency hearing loss. II: Articulation index predictions

Articulation index (AI) theory was used to evaluate stop-consonant recognition of normal-hearing listeners and listeners with high-frequency hearing loss. From results reported in a companion article [Dubno et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 85, 347-354 (1989)], a transfer function relating the AI to stop-consonant recognition was established, and a frequency importance function was determined for the nine stop-consonant-vowel syllables used as test stimuli. The calculations included the rms and peak levels of the speech that had been measured in 1/3 octave bands; the internal noise was estimated from the thresholds for each subject. The AI model was then used to predict performance for the hearing-impaired listeners. A majority of the AI predictions for the hearing-impaired subjects fell within +/- 2 standard deviations of the normal-hearing listeners' results. However, as observed in previous data, the AI tended to overestimate performance of the hearing-impaired listeners. The accuracy of the predictions decreased with the magnitude of high-frequency hearing loss. Thus, with the exception of performance for listeners with severe high-frequency hearing loss, the results suggest that poorer speech recognition among hearing-impaired listeners results from reduced audibility within critical spectral regions of the speech stimuli.     

Stop-consonant recognition for normal-hearing listeners and listeners with high-frequency hearing loss. I: The contribution of selected frequency regions

The purpose of this study is to specify the contribution of certain frequency regions to consonant place perception for normal-hearing listeners and listeners with high-frequency hearing loss, and to characterize the differences in stop-consonant place perception among these listeners. Stop-consonant recognition and error patterns were examined at various speech-presentation levels and under conditions of low- and high-pass filtering. Subjects included 18 normal-hearing listeners and a homogeneous group of 10 young, hearing-impaired individuals with high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss. Differential filtering effects on consonant place perception were consistent with the spectral composition of acoustic cues. Differences in consonant recognition and error patterns between normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners were observed when the stimulus bandwidth included regions of threshold elevation for the hearing-impaired listeners. Thus place-perception differences among listeners are, for the most part, associated with stimulus bandwidths corresponding to regions of hearing loss.     

Monosyllabic word recognition at higher-than-normal speech and noise levels

The effects of intensity on monosyllabic word recognition were studied in adults with normal hearing and mild-to-moderate sensorineural hearing loss. The stimuli were bandlimited NU#6 word lists presented in quiet and talker-spectrum-matched noise. Speech levels ranged from 64 to 99 dB SPL and S/N ratios from 28 to -4 dB. In quiet, the performance of normal-hearing subjects remained essentially constant in noise, at a fixed S/N ratio, it decreased as a linear function of speech level. Hearing-impaired subjects performed like normal-hearing subjects tested in noise when the data were corrected for the effects of audibility loss. From these and other results, it was concluded that: (1) speech intelligibility in noise decreases when speech levels exceed 69 dB SPL and the S/N ratio remains constant; (2) the effects of speech and noise level are synergistic; (3) the deterioration in intelligibility can be modeled as a relative increase in the effective masking level; (4) normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects are affected similarly by increased signal level when differences in speech audibility are considered; (5) the negative effects of increasing speech and noise levels on speech recognition are similar for all adult subjects, at least up to 80 years; and (6) the effective dynamic range of speech may be larger than the commonly assumed value of 30 dB.     

Spectral integration of speech bands in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners

This investigation examined whether listeners with mild-moderate sensorineural hearing impairment have a deficit in the ability to integrate synchronous spectral information in the perception of speech. In stage 1, the bandwidth of filtered speech centered either on 500 or 2500 Hz was varied adaptively to determine the width required for approximately 15%-25% correct recognition. In stage 2, these criterion bandwidths were presented simultaneously and percent correct performance was determined in fixed block trials. Experiment 1 tested normal-hearing listeners in quiet and in masking noise. The main findings were (1) there was no correlation between the criterion bandwidths at 500 and 2500 Hz; (2) listeners achieved a high percent correct in stage 2 (approximately 80%); and (3) performance in quiet and noise was similar. Experiment 2 tested listeners with mild-moderate sensorineural hearing impairment. The main findings were (1) the impaired listeners showed high variability in stage 1, with some listeners requiring narrower and others requiring wider bandwidths than normal, and (2) hearing-impaired listeners achieved percent correct performance in stage 2 that was comparable to normal. The results indicate that listeners with mild-moderate sensorineural hearing loss do not have an essential deficit in the ability to integrate across-frequency speech information.     

Sound localization in noise in hearing-impaired listeners.

The present study assesses the ability of four listeners with high-frequency, bilateral symmetrical sensorineural hearing loss to localize and detect a broadband click train in the frontal-horizontal plane, in quiet and in the presence of a white noise. The speaker array and stimuli are identical to those described by Lorenzi et al. (in press). The results show that: (1) localization performance is only slightly poorer in hearing-impaired listeners than in normal-hearing listeners when noise is at 0 deg azimuth, (2) localization performance begins to decrease at higher signal-to-noise ratios for hearing-impaired listeners than for normal-hearing listeners when noise is at +/- 90 deg azimuth, and (3) the performance of hearing-impaired listeners is less consistent when noise is at +/- 90 deg azimuth than at 0 deg azimuth. The effects of a high-frequency hearing loss were also studied by measuring the ability of normal-hearing listeners to localize the low-pass filtered version of the clicks. The data reproduce the effects of noise on three out of the four hearing-impaired listeners when noise is at 0 deg azimuth. They reproduce the effects of noise on only two out of the four hearing-impaired listeners when noise is at +/- 90 deg azimuth. The additional effects of a low-frequency hearing loss were investigated by attenuating the low-pass filtered clicks and the noise by 20 dB. The results show that attenuation does not strongly affect localization accuracy for normal-hearing listeners. Measurements of the clicks' detectability indicate that the hearing-impaired listeners who show the poorest localization accuracy also show the poorest ability to detect the clicks. The inaudibility of high frequencies, "distortions," and reduced detectability of the signal are assumed to have caused the poorer-than-normal localization accuracy for hearing-impaired listeners.     

Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing

The speech-reception threshold (SRT) for sentences presented in a fluctuating interfering background sound of 80 dBA SPL is measured for 20 normal-hearing listeners and 20 listeners with sensorineural hearing impairment. The interfering sounds range from steady-state noise, via modulated noise, to a single competing voice. Two voices are used, one male and one female, and the spectrum of the masker is shaped according to these voices. For both voices, the SRT is measured as well in noise spectrally shaped according to the target voice as shaped according to the other voice. The results show that, for normal-hearing listeners, the SRT for sentences in modulated noise is 4-6 dB lower than for steady-state noise; for sentences masked by a competing voice, this difference is 6-8 dB. For listeners with moderate sensorineural hearing loss, elevated thresholds are obtained without an appreciable effect of masker fluctuations. The implications of these results for estimating a hearing handicap in everyday conditions are discussed. By using the articulation index (AI), it is shown that hearing-impaired individuals perform poorer than suggested by the loss of audibility for some parts of the speech signal. Finally, three mechanisms are discussed that contribute to the absence of unmasking by masker fluctuations in hearing-impaired listeners. The low sensation level at which the impaired listeners receive the masker seems a major determinant. The second and third factors are: reduced temporal resolution and a reduction in comodulation masking release, respectively.     

Effects of age and mild hearing loss on speech recognition in noise

Using an adaptive strategy, the effects of mild sensorineural hearing loss and adult listeners' chronological age on speech recognition in babble were evaluated. The signal-to-babble ratio required to achieve 50% recognition was measured for three speech materials presented at soft to loud conversational speech levels. Four groups of subjects were tested: (1) normal-hearing listeners less than 44 years of age, (2) subjects less than 44 years old with mild sensorineural hearing loss and excellent speech recognition in quiet, (3) normal-hearing listeners greater than 65 with normal hearing, and (4) subjects greater than 65 years old with mild hearing loss and excellent performance in quiet. Groups 1 and 3, and groups 2 and 4 were matched on the basis of pure-tone thresholds, and thresholds for each of the three speech materials presented in quiet. In addition, groups 1 and 2 were similar in terms of mean age and age range, as were groups 3 and 4. Differences in performance in noise as a function of age were observed for both normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners despite equivalent performance in quiet. Subjects with mild hearing loss performed significantly worse than their normal-hearing counterparts. These results and their implications are discussed.     

Auditory filter characteristics and consonant recognition for hearing-impaired listeners

To examine the association between frequency resolution and speech recognition, auditory filter parameters and stop-consonant recognition were determined for 9 normal-hearing and 24 hearing-impaired subjects. In an earlier investigation, the relationship between stop-consonant recognition and the articulation index (AI) had been established on normal-hearing listeners. Based on AI predictions, speech-presentation levels for each subject in this experiment were selected to obtain a wide range of recognition scores. This strategy provides a method of interpreting speech-recognition performance among listeners who vary in magnitude and configuration of hearing loss by assuming that conditions which yield equal audible spectra will result in equivalent performance. It was reasoned that an association between frequency resolution and consonant recognition may be more appropriately estimated if hearing-impaired listeners' performance was measured under conditions that assured equivalent audibility of the speech stimuli. Derived auditory filter parameters indicated that filter widths and dynamic ranges were strongly associated with threshold. Stop-consonant recognition scores for most hearing-impaired listeners were not significantly poorer than predicted by the AI model. Furthermore, differences between observed recognition scores and those predicted by the AI were not associated with auditory filter characteristics, suggesting that frequency resolution and speech recognition may appear to be associated primarily because both are degraded by threshold elevation.     

The effect of hearing impairment on the identification of speech that is modulated synchronously or asynchronously across frequency

This study investigated the effect of mild-to-moderate sensorineural hearing loss on the ability to identify speech in noise for vowel-consonant-vowel tokens that were either unprocessed, amplitude modulated synchronously across frequency, or amplitude modulated asynchronously across frequency. One goal of the study was to determine whether hearing-impaired listeners have a particular deficit in the ability to integrate asynchronous spectral information in the perception of speech. Speech tokens were presented at a high, fixed sound level and the level of a speech-shaped noise was changed adaptively to estimate the masked speech identification threshold. The performance of the hearing-impaired listeners was generally worse than that of the normal-hearing listeners, but the impaired listeners showed particularly poor performance in the synchronous modulation condition. This finding suggests that integration of asynchronous spectral information does not pose a particular difficulty for hearing-impaired listeners with mild/moderate hearing losses. Results are discussed in terms of common mechanisms that might account for poor speech identification performance of hearing-impaired listeners when either the masking noise or the speech is synchronously modulated.     

Real-ear attenuation of earmuffs in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired individuals

Many of the 9 million workers exposed to average noise levels of 85 dB (A) and above are required to wear hearing protection devices, and many of these workers have already developed noise-induced hearing impairments. There is some evidence in the literature that hearing-impaired users may not receive as much attenuation from hearing protectors as normal-hearing users. This study assessed real-ear attenuation at threshold for ten normal-hearing and ten hearing-impaired subjects using a set of David Clark 10A earmuffs. Testing procedures followed the specifications of ANSI S12.6-1984. The results showed that the hearing-impaired subjects received slightly more attenuation than the normal-hearing subjects at all frequencies, but these differences were not statistically significant. These results provide additional support to the finding that hearing protection devices are capable of providing as much attenuation to hearing-impaired users as they do to normal-hearing individuals.     

The interpretation of speech reception threshold data in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners: steady-state noise

Speech-in-noise-measurements are important in clinical practice and have been the subject of research for a long time. The results of these measurements are often described in terms of the speech reception threshold (SRT) and SNR loss. Using the basic concepts that underlie several models of speech recognition in steady-state noise, the present study shows that these measures are ill-defined, most importantly because the slope of the speech recognition functions for hearing-impaired listeners always decreases with hearing loss. This slope can be determined from the slope of the normal-hearing speech recognition function when the SRT for the hearing-impaired listener is known. The SII-function (i.e., the speech intelligibility index (SII) against SNR) is important and provides insights into many potential pitfalls when interpreting SRT data. Standardized SNR loss, sSNR loss, is introduced as a universal measure of hearing loss for speech in steady-state noise. Experimental data demonstrates that, unlike the SRT or SNR loss, sSNR loss is invariant to the target point chosen, the scoring method or the type of speech material.     

Effects of acoustic modification on consonant recognition by elderly hearing-impaired subjects

In a recent study [S. Gordon-Salant, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 80, 1599-1607 (1986)], young and elderly normal-hearing listeners demonstrated significant improvements in consonant-vowel (CV) recognition with acoustic modification of the speech signal incorporating increments in the consonant-vowel ratio (CVR). Acoustic modification of consonant duration failed to enhance performance. The present study investigated whether consonant recognition deficits of elderly hearing-impaired listeners would be reduced by these acoustic modifications, as well as by increases in speech level. Performance of elderly hearing-impaired listeners with gradually sloping and sharply sloping sensorineural hearing losses was compared to performance of elderly normal-threshold listeners (reported previously) for recognition of a variety of nonsense syllable stimuli. These stimuli included unmodified CVs, CVs with increases in CVR, CVs with increases in consonant duration, and CVs with increases in both CVR and consonant duration. Stimuli were presented at each of two speech levels with a background of noise. Results obtained from the hearing-impaired listeners agreed with those observed previously from normal-hearing listeners. Differences in performance between the three subject groups as a function of level were observed also.     

Spatial release from masking in normal-hearing children and children who use hearing aids

Listening to speech in competing sounds poses a major difficulty for children with impaired hearing. This study aimed to determine the ability of children (3-12 yr of age) to use spatial separation between target speech and competing babble to improve speech intelligibility. Fifty-eight children (31 with normal hearing and 27 with impaired hearing who use bilateral hearing aids) were assessed by word and sentence material. Speech reception thresholds (SRTs) were measured with speech presented from 0° azimuth, and competing babble from either 0° or ±90° azimuth. Spatial release from masking (SRM) was defined as the difference between SRTs measured with co-located speech and babble and SRTs measured with spatially separated speech and babble. On average, hearing-impaired children attained near-normal performance when speech and babble originated from the frontal source, but performed poorer than their normal-hearing peers when babble was spatially separated from target speech. On average, normal-hearing children obtained an SRM of 3 dB whereas children with hearing loss did not demonstrate SRM. Results suggest that hearing-impaired children may need enhancement in signal-to-noise ratio to hear speech in difficult listening conditions as well as normal-hearing children.     

Factors affecting masking release for speech in modulated noise for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners

The Speech Reception Threshold for sentences in stationary noise and in several amplitude-modulated noises was measured for 8 normal-hearing listeners, 29 sensorineural hearing-impaired listeners, and 16 normal-hearing listeners with simulated hearing loss. This approach makes it possible to determine whether the reduced benefit from masker modulations, as often observed for hearing-impaired listeners, is due to a loss of signal audibility, or due to suprathreshold deficits, such as reduced spectral and temporal resolution, which were measured in four separate psychophysical tasks. Results show that the reduced masking release can only partly be accounted for by reduced audibility, and that, when considering suprathreshold deficits, the normal effects associated with a raised presentation level should be taken into account. In this perspective, reduced spectral resolution does not appear to qualify as an actual suprathreshold deficit, while reduced temporal resolution does. Temporal resolution and age are shown to be the main factors governing masking release for speech in modulated noise, accounting for more than half of the intersubject variance. Their influence appears to be related to the processing of mainly the higher stimulus frequencies. Results based on calculations of the Speech Intelligibility Index in modulated noise confirm these conclusions.     

Effect of multiple speechlike maskers on binaural speech recognition in normal and impaired hearing.

Speech-reception thresholds (SRT) were measured for 17 normal-hearing and 17 hearing-impaired listeners in conditions simulating free-field situations with between one and six interfering talkers. The stimuli, speech and noise with identical long-term average spectra, were recorded with a KEMAR manikin in an anechoic room and presented to the subjects through headphones. The noise was modulated using the envelope fluctuations of the speech. Several conditions were simulated with the speaker always in front of the listener and the maskers either also in front, or positioned in a symmetrical or asymmetrical configuration around the listener. Results show that the hearing impaired have significantly poorer performance than the normal hearing in all conditions. The mean SRT differences between the groups range from 4.2-10 dB. It appears that the modulations in the masker act as an important cue for the normal-hearing listeners, who experience up to 5-dB release from masking, while being hardly beneficial for the hearing impaired listeners. The gain occurring when maskers are moved from the frontal position to positions around the listener varies from 1.5 to 8 dB for the normal hearing, and from 1 to 6.5 dB for the hearing impaired. It depends strongly on the number of maskers and their positions, but less on hearing impairment. The difference between the SRTs for binaural and best-ear listening (the "cocktail party effect") is approximately 3 dB in all conditions for both the normal-hearing and the hearing-impaired listeners.     

Tone detection and synthetic speech discrimination in band-reject noise by hearing-impaired listeners

Frequency resolution was evaluated for two normal-hearing and seven hearing-impaired subjects with moderate, flat sensorineural hearing loss by measuring percent correct detection of a 2000-Hz tone as the width of a notch in band-reject noise increased. The level of the tone was fixed for each subject at a criterion performance level in broadband noise. Discrimination of synthetic speech syllables that differed in spectral content in the 2000-Hz region was evaluated as a function of the notch width in the same band-reject noise. Recognition of natural speech consonant/vowel syllables in quiet was also tested; results were analyzed for percent correct performance and relative information transmitted for voicing and place features. In the hearing-impaired subjects, frequency resolution at 2000 Hz was significantly correlated with the discrimination of synthetic speech information in the 2000-Hz region and was not related to the recognition of natural speech nonsense syllables unless (a) the speech stimuli contained the vowel /i/ rather than /a/, and (b) the score reflected information transmitted for place of articulation rather than percent correct.     

Effects of noise and distortion on speech quality judgments in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners

Noise and distortion reduce speech intelligibility and quality in audio devices such as hearing aids. This study investigates the perception and prediction of sound quality by both normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects for conditions of noise and distortion related to those found in hearing aids. Stimuli were sentences subjected to three kinds of distortion (additive noise, peak clipping, and center clipping), with eight levels of degradation for each distortion type. The subjects performed paired comparisons for all possible pairs of 24 conditions. A one-dimensional coherence-based metric was used to analyze the quality judgments. This metric was an extension of a speech intelligibility metric presented in Kates and Arehart (2005) [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 117, 2224-2237] and is based on dividing the speech signal into three amplitude regions, computing the coherence for each region, and then combining the three coherence values across frequency in a calculation based on the speech intelligibility index. The one-dimensional metric accurately predicted the quality judgments of normal-hearing listeners and listeners with mild-to-moderate hearing loss, although some systematic errors were present. A multidimensional analysis indicates that several dimensions are needed to describe the factors used by subjects to judge the effects of the three distortion types.     

Adaptive bandwidth measurements of importance functions for speech intelligibility prediction

The Articulation Index (AI) and Speech Intelligibility Index (SII) predict intelligibility scores from measurements of speech and hearing parameters. One component in the prediction is the "importance function," a weighting function that characterizes contributions of particular spectral regions of speech to speech intelligibility. Previous work with SII predictions for hearing-impaired subjects suggests that prediction accuracy might improve if importance functions for individual subjects were available. Unfortunately, previous importance function measurements have required extensive intelligibility testing with groups of subjects, using speech processed by various fixed-bandwidth low-pass and high-pass filters. A more efficient approach appropriate to individual subjects is desired. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of measuring importance functions for individual subjects with adaptive-bandwidth filters. In two experiments, ten subjects with normal-hearing listened to vowel-consonant-vowel (VCV) nonsense words processed by low-pass and high-pass filters whose bandwidths were varied adaptively to produce specified performance levels in accordance with the transformed up-down rules of Levitt [(1971). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 49, 467-477]. Local linear psychometric functions were fit to resulting data and used to generate an importance function for VCV words. Results indicate that the adaptive method is reliable and efficient, and produces importance function data consistent with that of the corresponding AI/SII importance function.     

The effects of hearing loss on the contribution of high- and low-frequency speech information to speech understanding

The speech understanding of persons with "flat" hearing loss (HI) was compared to a normal-hearing (NH) control group to examine how hearing loss affects the contribution of speech information in various frequency regions. Speech understanding in noise was assessed at multiple low- and high-pass filter cutoff frequencies. Noise levels were chosen to ensure that the noise, rather than quiet thresholds, determined audibility. The performance of HI subjects was compared to a NH group listening at the same signal-to-noise ratio and a comparable presentation level. Although absolute speech scores for the HI group were reduced, performance improvements as the speech and noise bandwidth increased were comparable between groups. These data suggest that the presence of hearing loss results in a uniform, rather than frequency-specific, deficit in the contribution of speech information. Measures of auditory thresholds in noise and speech intelligibility index (SII) calculations were also performed. These data suggest that differences in performance between the HI and NH groups are due primarily to audibility differences between groups. Measures of auditory thresholds in noise showed the "effective masking spectrum" of the noise was greater for the HI than the NH subjects.