Boron and other Triel Lewis Acid Centers: From Hypovalency to Hypervalency

MP2/aug‐cc‐pVTZ calculations were performed on triel trifluorides, ZF₃ (Z=B, Al, Ga, In, Tl), and their complexes with N₂ and HCN species, which are acting as Lewis bases. Interaction of the ZF₃ trigonal structure with a single HCN or N₂ ligand may lead to a tetrahedral structure with the tetravalent triel atom, whereas interaction of ZF₃ with two ligands results in a trigonal bipyramidal structure with a pentacoordinate Z atom. Consequently, the Z atom in ZF₃ compounds suffers from electron deficiency (hypovalency), it obeys the octet rule in ZF₃–NCH and ZF₃–N₂ moieties, and it may be considered as a hypervalent center in complexes of ZF₃ with two ligands. Much weaker interactions are observed for the boron complexes than for the other triel systems. This is because of the lower acidity of the B center relative to that of the other triel centers, and it may be the result of a stronger backbonding effect for BF₃ than for the other triel trifluorides. Interactions in aluminum complexes are characterized by meaningful electrostatic contributions, whereas for gallium complexes, the most important electron charge shift is observed as a result of complexation. Analysis of the geometry of the triel complexes and of the Z???N interactions (triel bonds) in these complexes is based on ab initio calculations as well as on the quantum theory of atoms in molecules and the natural bond orbitals method.     

Triel–hydride triel bond between ZX3 (Z = B and Al; X = H and Me) and THMe3 (T = Si,Ge and Sn)

Complexes between THMe₃ (T = Si, Ge and Sn) and ZX₃ (Z = B and Al; X = H and Me) have been characterized using MP2/aug‐cc‐pVTZ calculations. These complexes are chiefly stabilized by a triel–hydride triel bond with the T–H bond pointing to the π‐hole on the triel atom. The triel–hydride interaction is mainly attributed to the charge transfer from the T–H bond orbital to the empty p orbital of the triel atom. These complexes are very stable with a large interaction energy (>10 kcal mol^?1) excluding THMe₃···BMe₃ (T = Si and Ge), indicating that the sp²‐hydridized triel atom has a strong affinity for the T–H bond. The formation of THMe₃···BH₃ results in proton transfer, characterized by conversion of orbital interaction and large charge transfer (ca 0.5e). The large deformation is primarily responsible for the abnormally greater interaction energy in THMe₃···BH₃ (>30 kcal mol^?1) than in the AlH₃ analogue. Methyl substitution on the triel atom weakens the triel–hydride interaction and causes a larger interaction energy in THMe₃···AlMe₃ with respect to its BMe₃ counterpart. Most of these interactions possess characteristics of covalent bonds. Polarization makes a contribution to the stability of most complexes nearly equivalent to the electrostatic term.     

σ‐Hole Bond Versus Hydrogen Bond: From Tetravalent to Pentavalent N,P, and As Atoms

Ab initio calculations were performed on complexes of ZH₄⁺ (Z=N, P, As) and their fluoro derivatives, ZFH₃⁺ and ZF₄⁺, with a HCN (or LiCN) molecule acting as the Lewis base through the nitrogen electronegative center. It was found that the complexes are linked by the Z? H???N hydrogen bond or another type of noncovalent interaction in which the tetravalent heavy atom of the cation acts as the Lewis acid center, that is, when the Z???N link exists, which may be classified as the σ‐hole bond. The formation of the latter interaction is usually preferable to the formation of the corresponding hydrogen bond. The Z???N interaction may be also considered as the preliminary stage of the S_N2 reaction. This is supported by the observation that for a short Z???N contact, the corresponding complex geometry coincides with the trigonal‐bipyramidal geometry typical for the transition state of the S_N2 reaction. The Z???N interaction for some of complexes analyzed here possesses characteristics typical for covalent bonds. Numerous interrelations between geometrical, topological and energetic parameters are discussed. The natural bond orbital method as well as the Quantum Theory of “Atoms in Molecules” is applied to characterize interactions in the analyzed complexes. The experimental evidences of the existence of these interactions, based on the Cambridge Structure Database search, are also presented. In addition, it is justified that mechanisms of the formation of the Z???N interactions are similar to the processes occurring for the other noncovalent links. The formation of Z???N interaction as well as of other interactions may be explained with the use of the σ‐hole concept.     

Synergistic and diminutive effects between triel bond and regium bond: Attractive interactions between π‐hole and σ‐hole

High quantum chemical calculations have been performed for binary complexes of MCN···ZX₃ (M = Cu, Ag, Au; Z = B, Al; X = H, F) and C₂H₄···AlX₃. The strength of triel bonding depends on the nature of triel and coin metal atoms as well as the F substituents and electron donors. The molecular electrostatic potential (MEP) analysis confirms a σ‐hole at the M‐C bond end of MCN, engaging in a regium bond with C₂H₄ in an increasing sequence of AgCN < CuCN < AuCN. The complex C₂(CN)₄···AuCN is unstable in view of MEPs, but a big attractive interaction energy (?38 kcal/mol) is produced when both molecules approach, which is mainly caused by polarization including orbital interactions. Both types of interactions are strengthened in ternary complex of C₂H₄···MCN···ZX₃ but are weakened in NCAu···C₂H₄···AlX₃ and C₂(CN)₄···AuCN···ZH₃. It is found that the variation from synergistic to diminutive effects can be modulated by four CN groups in C₂(CN)₄. Interestingly, the binding distances of both interactions have an unexpected change. The cooperativity of both interactions has been explained with MEP and charge transfer. When C₂H₄ binds with AlX₃ or AuCN, its π electron density is greatly decreased and even its MEP becomes positive, but it is still able to participate in a regium bond or a triel bond.     

Comparative studies on group III σ‐hole and π‐hole interactions

The σ‐hole of M₂H₆ (M = Al, Ga, In) and π‐hole of MH₃ (M = Al, Ga, In) were discovered and analyzed, the bimolecular complexes M₂H₆···NH₃ and MH₃···N₂P₂F₄ (M = Al, Ga, In) were constructed to carry out comparative studies on the group III σ‐hole interactions and π‐hole interactions. The two types of interactions are all partial‐covalent interactions; the π‐hole interactions are stronger than σ‐hole interactions. The electrostatic energy is the largest contribution for forming the σ‐hole and π‐hole interaction, the polarization energy is also an important factor to form the M···N interaction. The electrostatic energy contributions to the interaction energy of the σ‐hole interactions are somewhat greater than those of the π‐hole interactions. However, the polarization contributions for the π‐hole interactions are somewhat greater than those for the σ‐hole interactions. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Influence of the Li⋅⋅⋅π Interaction on the H/X⋅⋅⋅π Interactions in HOLi⋅⋅⋅C6H6⋅⋅⋅HOX/XOH (X=F,Cl, Br,I) Complexes

The influences of the Li???π interaction of C₆H₆???LiOH on the H???π interaction of C₆H₆???HOX (X=F, Cl, Br, I) and the X???π interaction of C₆H₆???XOH (X=Cl, Br, I) are investigated by means of full electronic second‐order Møller–Plesset perturbation theory calculations and “quantum theory of atoms in molecules” (QTAIM) studies. The binding energies, binding distances, infrared vibrational frequencies, and electron densities at the bond critical points (BCPs) of the hydrogen bonds and halogen bonds prove that the addition of the Li???π interaction to benzene weakens the H???π and X???π interactions. The influences of the Li???π interaction on H???π interactions are greater than those on X???π interactions; the influences of the H???π interactions on the Li???π interaction are greater than X???π interactions on Li???π interaction. The greater the influence of Li???π interaction on H/X???π interactions, the greater the influences of H/X???π interactions on Li???π interaction. QTAIM studies show that the intermolecular interactions of C₆H₆???HOX and C₆H₆???XOH are mainly of the π type. The electron densities at the BCPs of hydrogen bonds and halogen bonds decrease on going from bimolecular complexes to termolecular complexes, and the π‐electron densities at the BCPs show the same pattern. Natural bond orbital analyses show that the Li???π interaction reduces electron transfer from C₆H₆ to HOX and XOH.     

The Role of Molecular Electrostatic Potentials in the Formation of a Halogen Bond in Furan⋅⋅⋅XY and Thiophene⋅⋅⋅XY Complexes

The halogen bonding of furan???XY and thiophene???XY (X=Cl, Br; Y=F, Cl, Br), involving σ‐ and π‐type interactions, was studied by using MP2 calculations and quantum theory of “atoms in molecules” (QTAIM) studies. The negative electrostatic potentials of furan and thiophene, as well as the most positive electrostatic potential (V_S,max) on the surface of the interacting X atom determined the geometries of the complexes. Linear relationships were found between interaction energy and V_S,max of the X atom, indicating that electrostatic interactions play an important role in these halogen‐bonding interactions. The halogen‐bonding interactions in furan???XY and thiophene???XY are weak, “closed‐shell” noncovalent interactions. The linear relationship of topological properties, energy properties, and the integration of interatomic surfaces versus V_S,max of atom X demonstrate the importance of the positive σ hole, as reflected by the computed V_S,max of atom X, in determining the topological properties of the halogen bonds.     

Reverse Arene Sandwich Structures Based upon π‐Hole⋅⋅⋅[MII] (d8 M=Pt,Pd) Interactions,where Positively Charged Metal Centers Play the Role of a Nucleophile

The complexes [Pt(tpp)] (H₂tpp=tetraphenylporphyrin), [M(acac)₂] (M=Pd, Pt, Hacac=acetylacetone), and [Pd(ba)₂] (Hba=benzoylacetone) were co‐crystallized with highly electron‐deficient arene systems to form reverse arene sandwich structures built by π‐hole???[M^II] (d⁸M=Pt, Pd) interactions. The adduct [Pt(tpp)]?2 C₆F₆ is monomeric, whereas the diketonate 1:1 adducts form columnar infinity 1D‐stack assembled by simultaneous action of both π‐hole???[M^II] and C???F interactions. The reverse sandwiches are based on noncovalent interactions and calculated ESP distributions indicate that in π‐hole???[M^II] contacts, [M^II] plays the role of a nucleophile.     

Reverse Arene Sandwich Structures Based upon π‐Hole⋅⋅⋅[MII] (d8 M=Pt,Pd) Interactions,where Positively Charged Metal Centers Play the Role of a Nucleophile

The complexes [Pt(tpp)] (H₂tpp=tetraphenylporphyrin), [M(acac)₂] (M=Pd, Pt, Hacac=acetylacetone), and [Pd(ba)₂] (Hba=benzoylacetone) were co‐crystallized with highly electron‐deficient arene systems to form reverse arene sandwich structures built by π‐hole???[M^II] (d⁸M=Pt, Pd) interactions. The adduct [Pt(tpp)]?2 C₆F₆ is monomeric, whereas the diketonate 1:1 adducts form columnar infinity 1D‐stack assembled by simultaneous action of both π‐hole???[M^II] and C???F interactions. The reverse sandwiches are based on noncovalent interactions and calculated ESP distributions indicate that in π‐hole???[M^II] contacts, [M^II] plays the role of a nucleophile.     

Clusters of Ammonium Cation—Hydrogen Bond versus σ‐Hole Bond

MP2/6‐311++G(d,p) calculations were performed on the NH₄⁺ ??? (HCN)_n and NH₄⁺ ??? (N₂)_n clusters (n=1–8), and interactions within them were analyzed. It was found that for molecules of N₂ and HCN, the N centers play the role of the Lewis bases, whereas the ammonium cation acts as the Lewis acid, as it is characterized by sites of positive electrostatic potential, that is, H atoms and the sites located at the N atom in the extension of the H?N bonds. Hence, the coordination number for the ammonium cation is eight, and two types of interactions of this cation with the Lewis base centers are possible: N?H ??? N hydrogen bonds and H?N ??? N interactions that are classified as σ‐hole bonds. Redistribution of the electronic charge resulting from complexation of the ammonium cation was analyzed. On the one hand, the interactions are similar, as they lead to electronic charge transfer from the Lewis base (HCN or N₂ in this study) to NH₄⁺. On the other hand, the hydrogen bond results in the accumulation of electronic charge on the N atom of the NH₄⁺ ion, whereas the σ‐hole bond results in the depletion of the electronic charge on this atom. Quantum theory of “atoms in molecules” and the natural bond orbital method were applied to deepen the understanding of the nature of the interactions analyzed. Density functional theory/natural energy decomposition analysis was used to analyze the interactions of the ammonium ion with various types of Lewis bases. Different correlations between the geometrical, energetic, and topological parameters were found and discussed.     

Interplay between Metal⋅⋅⋅π Interactions and Hydrogen Bonds: Some Unusual Synergetic Effects of Coinage Metals and Substituents

The ternary systems of C₂H₄ (C₂H₂ or C₆H₆)‐MCN‐HF (M=Cu, Ag, Au) and the respective binary systems were investigated to study the interplay between metal???π interactions and hydrogen bonds. The metal???π interactions in C₂H₄‐MCN become stronger with the irregular order Ag<Cu<Au, while the hydrogen bonds in MCN‐HF become weaker following the same order. The metal???π interactions are weakened as the H atoms in the π system are replaced with electron‐withdrawing groups and enhanced by electron‐donating groups. Type 1 of these ternary systems, in which MCN acts as Lewis base and acid simultaneously, is more stable than type 2, in which C₂H₄ acts as a double Lewis base. Negative cooperativity is present in type 2 ternary systems with a weakening of the metal???π interactions and the hydrogen bonds. Positive cooperativity is found in type 1 ternary systems with an enhancement of the metal???π interactions and the hydrogen bonds, except for C₂(CN)₄‐AuCN‐HF‐1. The weaker metal???π interaction in C₆H₆‐AuCN has a greater enhancing effect on the hydrogen bond in AuCN‐HF than those in C₂H₄‐AuCN and C₂H₂‐AuCN. These synergetic effects were analyzed with the natural bond orbital and energy decomposition.     

Using (FH)2 and (FH)3 to Bridge the σ‐Hole and the Lone Pair at P in Complexes with H2XP,for X=CH3, OH,H, CCH,F, Cl,NC, and CN

Ab initio MP2/aug′‐cc‐pVTZ calculations are used to investigate the binary complexes H₂XP:HF, the ternary complexes H₂XP:(FH)₂, and the quaternary complexes H₂XP:(FH)₃, for X=CH₃, OH, H, CCH, F, Cl, NC, and CN. Hydrogen‐bonded (HB) binary complexes are formed between all H₂XP molecules and FH, but only H₂FP, H₂ClP, and H₂(NC)P form pnicogen‐bonded (ZB) complexes with FH. Ternary complexes with (FH)₂ are stabilized by F?H???P and F?H???F hydrogen bonds and F???P pnicogen bonds, except for H₂(CH₃)P:(FH)₂ and H₃P:(FH)₂, which do not have pnicogen bonds. All quaternary complexes H₂XP:(FH)₃ are stabilized by both F?H???P and F?H???F hydrogen bonds and P???F pnicogen bonds. Thus, (FH)₂ with two exceptions, and (FH)₃ can bridge the σ‐hole and the lone pair at P in these complexes. The binding energies of H₂XP:(FH)₃ complexes are significantly greater than the binding energies of H₂XP:(FH)₂ complexes, and nonadditivities are synergistic in both series. Charge transfer occurs across all intermolecular bonds from the lone‐pair donor atom to an antibonding σ* orbital of the acceptor molecule, and stabilizes these complexes. Charge‐transfer energies across the pnicogen bond correlate with the intermolecular P?F distance, while charge‐transfer energies across F?H???P and F?H???F hydrogen bonds correlate with the distance between the lone‐pair donor atom and the hydrogen‐bonded H atom. In binary and quaternary complexes, charge transfer energies also correlate with the distance between the electron‐donor atom and the hydrogen‐bonded F atom. EOM‐CCSD spin‐spin coupling constants ^2hJ(F–P) across F?H???P hydrogen bonds, and ^1pJ(P–F) across pnicogen bonds in binary, ternary, and quaternary complexes exhibit strong correlations with the corresponding intermolecular distances. Hydrogen bonds are better transmitters of F–P coupling data than pnicogen bonds, despite the longer F???P distances in F?H???P hydrogen bonds compared to P???F pnicogen bonds. There is a correlation between the two bond coupling constants ^2hJ(F–F) in the quaternary complexes and the corresponding intermolecular distances, but not in the ternary complexes, a reflection of the distorted geometries of the bridging dimers in ternary complexes.     

The Bright Future of Unconventional σ/π‐Hole Interactions

Non‐covalent interactions play a crucial role in (supramolecular) chemistry and much of biology. Supramolecular forces can indeed determine the structure and function of a host–guest system. Many sensors, for example, rely on reversible bonding with the analyte. Natural machineries also often have a significant non‐covalent component (e.g. protein folding, recognition) and rational interference in such ‘living’ devices can have pharmacological implications. For the rational design/tweaking of supramolecular systems it is helpful to know what supramolecular synthons are available and to understand the forces that make these synthons stick to one another. In this review we focus on σ‐hole and π‐hole interactions. A σ‐ or π‐hole can be seen as positive electrostatic potential on unpopulated σ* or π⁽*⁾ orbitals, which are thus capable of interacting with some electron dense region. A σ‐hole is typically located along the vector of a covalent bond such as X?H or X?Hlg (X=any atom, Hlg=halogen), which are respectively known as hydrogen and halogen bond donors. Only recently it has become clear that σ‐holes can also be found along a covalent bond with chalcogen (X?Ch), pnictogen (X?Pn) and tetrel (X?Tr) atoms. Interactions with these synthons are named chalcogen, pnigtogen and tetrel interactions. A π‐hole is typically located perpendicular to the molecular framework of diatomic π‐systems such as carbonyls, or conjugated π‐systems such as hexafluorobenzene. Anion–π and lone‐pair–π interactions are examples of named π‐hole interactions between conjugated π‐systems and anions or lone‐pair electrons respectively. While the above nomenclature indicates the distinct chemical identity of the supramolecular synthon acting as Lewis acid, it is worth stressing that the underlying physics is very similar. This implies that interactions that are now not so well‐established might turn out to be equally useful as conventional hydrogen and halogen bonds. In summary, we describe the physical nature of σ‐ and π‐hole interactions, present a selection of inquiries that utilise σ‐ and π‐holes, and give an overview of analyses of structural databases (CSD/PDB) that demonstrate how prevalent these interactions already are in solid‐state structures.     

Homonuclear chalcogen–chalcogen bond interactions in complexes pairing YO3 and YHX molecules (Y = S,Se; X = H,Cl, Br,CCH, NC,OH, OCH3): Influence of substitution and cooperativity

MP2/aug‐cc‐pVTZ calculations are performed on complexes of YO₃ (Y = S, Se) with a series of electron‐donating chalcogen bases YHX (X = H, Cl, Br, CCH, NC, OH, OCH₃). These complexes are formed through the interaction of a positive electrostatic potential region (π‐hole) on the YO₃ molecule with the negative region in YHX. Interaction energies of the binary O₃Y???YHX complexes are in the range of ?4.37 to ?12.09 kcal/mol. The quantum theory of atoms in molecules and the natural bond orbital analysis were applied to characterize the nature of interactions. It was found that the formation and stability of these binary complexes are ruled mainly by electrostatic effects, although the electron charge transfer from YHX to YO₃ unit also seems to play an important role. In addition, mutual influence between the Y???N and Y???Y interactions is studied in the ternary HCN???O₃Y???YHX complexes. The results indicate that the formation of a Y???N interaction tends to weaken Y???Y bond in the ternary systems. Although the Y???Y interaction is weaker than the Y???N one, however, both types of interactions seem to compete with each other in the HCN???O₃Y???YHX complexes. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Germacyclobutenes: Generation by 1,1‐Carbalumination or 1,1‐Carbagallation and Their Photophysical Properties

Aluminium‐ and gallium‐functionalised alkenylalkynylgermanes, R¹₂Ge(C?C?R²)[C{E(CMe₃)₂}?C(H)?R²] (E=Al, Ga), exhibit a close contact between the coordinatively unsaturated Al or Ga atoms and the α‐C atoms of the intact ethynyl groups. These interactions activate the Ge?C(alkynyl) bonds and favour the thermally induced insertion of these C atoms into the E?C(vinyl) bonds by means of 1,1‐carbalumination or 1,1‐carbagallation reactions. For the first time the latter method was shown to be a powerful alternative to known metallation processes. Germacyclobutenes with an unsaturated GeC₃ heterocycle and endo‐ and exocyclic C?C bonds resulted from concomitant Ge?C bond formation to the β‐C atoms of the alkynyl groups. These heterocyclic compounds show an interesting photoluminescence behaviour with Stokes shifts of >110 nm. The fascinating properties are based on extended π‐delocalisation including σ*‐orbitals localised at Ge and Al. High‐level quantum chemical DFT and TD‐DFT calculations for an Al compound were applied to elucidate their absorption and emission properties. They revealed a biradical excited state with the transfer of a π‐electron into the empty p‐orbital at Al and a pyramidalisation of the metal atom.     

Control over the Self‐Assembly Modes of PtII Complexes by Alkyl Chain Variation: From Slipped to Parallel π‐Stacks

We report the self‐assembly of a new family of hydrophobic, bis(pyridyl) Pt^II complexes featuring an extended oligophenyleneethynylene‐derived π‐surface appended with six long (dodecyloxy ( 2 )) or short (methoxy ( 3 )) side groups. Complex 2 , containing dodecyloxy chains, forms fibrous assemblies with a slipped arrangement of the monomer units (d_Pt???Pt≈14 Å) in both nonpolar solvents and the solid state. Dispersion‐corrected PM6 calculations suggest that this organization is driven by cooperative π–π, C?H???Cl and π–Pt interactions, which is supported by EXAFS and 2D NMR spectroscopic analysis. In contrast, nearly parallel π‐stacks (d_Pt???Pt≈4.4 Å) stabilized by multiple π–π and C?H???Cl contacts are obtained in the crystalline state for 3 lacking long side chains, as shown by X‐ray analysis and PM6 calculations. Our results reveal not only the key role of alkyl chain length in controlling self‐assembly modes but also show the relevance of Pt‐bound chlorine ligands as new supramolecular synthons.     

Elusive Silane–Alane Complex [SiH⋅⋅⋅Al]: Isolation,Characterization, and Multifaceted Frustrated Lewis Pair Type Catalysis

The super acidity of the unsolvated Al(C₆F₅)₃ enabled isolation of the elusive silane–alane complex [Si? H???Al], which was structurally characterized by spectroscopic and X‐ray diffraction methods. The Janus‐like nature of this adduct, coupled with strong silane activation, effects multifaceted frustrated‐Lewis‐pair‐type catalysis. When compared with the silane–borane system, the silane–alane system offers unique features or clear advantages in the four types of catalytic transformations examined in this study, including: ligand redistribution of tertiary silanes into secondary and quaternary silanes, polymerization of conjugated polar alkenes, hydrosilylation of unactivated alkenes, and hydrodefluorination of fluoroalkanes.     

Hydride‐Triel Bonds

In this article, we present the results of our comprehensive studies of 72 dimers of the type (X = Si, Ge; Y = B, Al, Ga; R^X = H, Cl, Me; R^Y = H, F, Cl, Me) and featuring hydride‐triel bonds (i.e., charge‐inverted hydrogen bonds). Influence of X and Y atoms as well as R^X and R^Y substituents on various properties of these dimers is investigated in detail. In particular the strength of the H⋯Y hydride‐triel bonds is paid a close attention and it is shown that hydride‐triel bonds can be strong enough to considerably determine structure and properties of molecular systems. In addition, properties of the investigated dimers are largely governed by the charge transfer from the Lewis base to the Lewis acid, which is particularly important if more bulky and polarizable R^Y and Y atoms are present in the molecule. Several excellent linear (R² close to 1) and exponential correlations between pairs of diverse parameters are presented. Few instances are discussed where somewhat unexpected bond paths exist between two atoms featuring partial negative charges (e.g., between hydride hydrogen and halogen and between lateral sides of two halogens) showing that in some cases a bond path prefers to link two closely spaced electron‐rich atoms instead of two atoms that are expected to form a bond. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Creating σ‐Holes through the Formation of Beryllium Bonds

Through the use of ab initio theoretical models based on MP2/aug‐cc‐pVDZ‐optimized geometries and CCSD(T)/aug‐cc‐pVTZ and CCSD(T)/aug‐c‐pVDZ total energies, it has been shown that the significant electron density rearrangements that follow the formation of a beryllium bond may lead to the appearance of a σ‐hole in systems that previously do not exhibit this feature, such as CH₃OF, NO₂F, NO₃F, and other fluorine‐containing systems. The creation of the σ‐hole is another manifestation of the bond activation–reinforcement (BAR) rule. The appearance of a σ‐hole on the F atoms of CH₃OF is due to the enhancement of the electronegativity of the O atom that participates in the beryllium bond. This atom recovers part of the charge transferred to Be by polarizing the valence density of the F into the bonding region. An analysis of the electron density shows that indeed this bond becomes reinforced, but the F atom becomes more electron deficient with the appearance of the σ‐hole. Importantly, similar effects are also observed even when the atom participating in the beryllium bond is not directly attached to the F atom, as in NO₂F, NO₃F, or NCF. Hence, whereas the isolated CH₃OF, NO₂F, and NO₃F are unable to yield F ??? Base halogen bonds, their complexes with BeX₂ derivatives are able to yield such bonds. Significant cooperative effects between the new halogen bond and the beryllium bond reinforce the strength of both noncovalent interactions.