X‐ray and DFT studies of a mono‐ and binuclear copper(II) ionic compound containing a Schiff base

In the structure of trans‐bis(ethanol‐κO)tetrakis(1H‐imidazole‐κN³)copper(II) bis[μ‐N‐(2‐oxidobenzylidene)‐D,L‐glutamato]‐κ⁴O¹,N,O^2′:O^2′;κ⁴O^2′:O¹,N,O^2′‐bis[(1H‐imidazole‐κN³)cuprate(II)], [Cu(C₃H₄N₂)₄(C₂H₆O)₂][Cu₂(C₁₅H₁₄N₃O₅)₂], both ions are located on centres of inversion. The cation is mononuclear, showing a distorted octahedral coordination, while the anion is a binuclear centrosymmetric dimer with a square‐pyramidal copper(II) coordination. An extensive three‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonding network is formed between the ions. According to B3LYP/6–31G* calculations, the two equivalent components of the anion are in doublet states (spin density located mostly on Cu^II ions) and are coupled as a triplet, with only marginal preference over an open‐shell singlet.     

Oxidative degradation of the organometallic iron(II) complex [Fe{bis[3‐(pyridin‐2‐yl)‐1H‐imidazol‐1‐yl]methane}(MeCN)(PMe3)](PF6)2: structure of the ligand decomposition product trapped via coordination to iron(II)

Iron is of interest as a catalyst because of its established use in the Haber–Bosch process and because of its high abundance and low toxicity. Nitrogen‐heterocyclic carbenes (NHC) are important ligands in homogeneous catalysis and iron–NHC complexes have attracted increasing attention in recent years but still face problems in terms of stability under oxidative conditions. The structure of the iron(II) complex [1,1′‐bis(pyridin‐2‐yl)‐2,2‐bi(1H‐imidazole)‐κN³][3,3′‐bis(pyridin‐2‐yl‐κN)‐1,1′‐methanediylbi(1H‐imidazol‐2‐yl‐κC²)](trimethylphosphane‐κP)iron(II) bis(hexafluoridophosphate), [Fe(C₁₇H₁₄N₆)(C₁₆H₁₂N₆)(C₃H₉P)](PF₆)₂, features coordination by an organic decomposition product of a tetradentate NHC ligand in an axial position. The decomposition product, a C—C‐coupled biimidazole, is trapped by coordination to still‐intact iron(II) complexes. Insights into the structural features of the organic decomposition products might help to improve the stability of oxidation catalysts under harsh conditions.     

In situ synthesis of mononuclear copper(II) complexes of the new tridentate ligand bis[(3,5‐dimethyl‐1H‐pyrazol‐1‐yl)methyl]amine

Two mononuclear copper complexes, {bis[(3,5‐dimethyl‐1H‐pyrazol‐1‐yl‐κN²)methyl]amine‐κN}(3,5‐dimethyl‐1H‐pyrazole‐κN²)(perchlorato‐κO)copper(II) perchlorate, [Cu(ClO₄)(C₅H₈N₂)(C₁₂H₁₉N₅)]ClO₄, (I), and {bis[(3,5‐dimethyl‐1H‐pyrazol‐1‐yl‐κN²)methyl]amine‐κN}bis(3,5‐dimethyl‐1H‐pyrazole‐κN²)copper(II) bis(hexafluoridophosphate), [Cu(C₅H₈N₂)₂(C₁₂H₁₉N₅)](PF₆)₂, (II), have been synthesized by the reactions of different copper salts with the tripodal ligand tris[(3,5‐dimethyl‐1H‐pyrazol‐1‐yl)methyl]amine (TDPA) in acetone–water solutions at room temperature. Single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction analysis revealed that they contain the new tridentate ligand bis[(3,5‐dimethyl‐1H‐pyrazol‐1‐yl)methyl]amine (BDPA), which cannot be obtained by normal organic reactions and has thus been captured in the solid state by in situ synthesis. The coordination of the Cu^II ion is distorted square pyramidal in (I) and distorted trigonal bipyramidal in (II). The new in situ generated tridentate BDPA ligand can act as a meridional or facial ligand during the process of coordination. The crystal structures of these two compounds are stabilized by classical hydrogen bonding as well as intricate nonclassical hydrogen‐bond interactions.     

Two mononuclear Tc complexes: [2,2′‐(3‐phenylpropylimino)‐ and [2,2′‐(propylimino)bis(ethanethiolato)](4‐methoxybenzenethiolato)oxidotechnate(V)

The molecular structures of the two mononuclear title complexes, namely (4‐methoxybenzenethiolato‐κS)oxido[2,2′‐(3‐phenylpropylimino)bis(ethanethiolato)‐κ³S,N,S′]technetium(V), [Tc(C₁₄H₂₁NS₂)(C₇H₇OS)O], (I), and (4‐methoxybenzenethiolato‐κS)oxido[2,2′‐(propylimino)bis(ethanethiolato)‐κ³S,N,S′]technetium(V), [Tc(C₇H₁₅NS₂)(C₇H₇OS)O], (II), exhibit the same coordination environment for the central Tc atoms. The atoms are five‐coordinated (TcNOS₃) with a square‐pyramidal geometry comprising a tridentate 2,2′‐(3‐phenylpropylimino)bis(ethanethiolate) or 2,2′‐(propylimino)bis(ethanethiolate) ligand, a 4‐methoxybenzenethiolate ligand and an additional oxide O atom. Intermolecular C—H...O and C—H...S hydrogen bonds between the monomeric units result in two‐dimensional layers with a parallel arrangement.     

Mercury(II) thiolate complexes of two flexible benzimidazole‐based ligands

The structure of catena‐poly[[{bis[4‐(trimethylammonio)benzenethiolate‐κS]mercury(II)}‐μ‐1,1′‐(ethane‐1,2‐diyl)bis(1H‐benzimidazole)‐κ²N³:N^3′] bis(hexafluoridophosphate) 0.25‐hydrate], {[Hg(C₁₆H₁₄N₄)(C₉H₁₃NS)₂](PF₆)₂·0.25H₂O}_n, contains a one‐dimensional zigzag chain. The Hg^II cation is coordinated by two S atoms of two 4‐(trimethylammonio)benzenethiolate (Tab) ligands and by two N atoms from two different 1,1′‐(ethane‐1,2‐diyl)bis(1H‐benzimidazole) ligands, forming a distorted seesaw‐shaped coordination geometry. The F atoms of the hexafluoridophosphate anion interact with the H atoms of the Tab ligand, generating a two‐dimensional network. Furthermore, this layer is connected to neighbouring layers via H...π interactions, thereby forming a three‐dimensional hydrogen‐bonded structure. In catena‐poly[[{[4‐(trimethylammonio)benzenethiolate‐κS]mercury(II)}bis[μ‐4‐(trimethylammonio)benzenethiolate‐κ²S:S]{[4‐(trimethylammonio)benzenethiolate‐κS]mercury(II)}‐μ‐1,1′‐(hexane‐1,6‐diyl)bis(1H‐benzimidazole)‐κ²N³:N^3′] tetrakis(hexafluoridophosphate)], {[Hg₂(C₂₀H₂₂N₄)(C₉H₁₃NS)₄](PF₆)₄}_n, each Hg^II cation is coordinated by two S atoms of two Tab ligands and one N atom of the 1,1′‐(hexane‐1,6‐diyl)bis(1H‐benzimidazole) (hbbm) ligand, forming a distorted T‐shaped coordination geometry, while longer secondary Hg...S bonds join two such units across a centre of inversion to give the tetravalent cation. Adjacent {[Hg(Tab)₂]₂(μ‐hbbm)}⁴⁺ cations are linked through the centrosymmetric hbbm ligands to afford a one‐dimensional chain extending along the b axis. Several F atoms interact with the H atoms of the Tab and hbbm ligands, while the S atom interacts with an aromatic H atom of a different Tab ligand, to afford a complex intra‐ and intermolecular hydrogen‐bonding arrangement in a three‐dimensional structure.     

Two zinc(II) coordination complexes based on an asymmetric multidentate ligand: syntheses,structures, selective fluorescence sensing of iron(III) ions and thermal analyses

The rational selection of ligands is vitally important in the construction of coordination complexes. Two novel Zn^II complexes, namely bis(acetato‐κO)bis[1‐(1H‐benzotriazol‐1‐ylmethyl)‐2‐propyl‐1H‐imidazole‐κN³]zinc(II) monohydrate, [Zn(C₁₃H₁₅N₅)₂(C₂H₃O₂)₂]·H₂O, ( 1 ), and bis(azido‐κN¹)bis[1‐(1H‐benzotriazol‐1‐ylmethyl)‐2‐propyl‐1H‐imidazole‐κN³]zinc(II), [Zn(C₁₃H₁₅N₅)₂(N₃)₂], ( 2 ), constructed from the asymmetric multidentate imidazole ligand, have been synthesized under mild conditions and characterized by elemental analyses, IR spectroscopy and single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction analysis. Both complexes exhibit a three‐dimensional supramolecular network directed by different intermolecular interactions between discrete mononuclear units. The complexes were also investigated by fluorescence and thermal analyses. The experimental results show that ( 1 ) is a promising fluorescence sensor for detecting Fe³⁺ ions and ( 2 ) is effective as an accelerator of the thermal decomposition of ammonium perchlorate.     

Monodentate and bridging behaviour of the sulfur‐containing ligand 4′‐[4‐(methylsulfanyl)phenyl]‐4,2′:6′,4′′‐terpyridine in two discrete zinc(II) complexes with acetylacetonate

The Zn complexes bis(acetylacetonato‐κ²O,O′)bis{4′‐[4‐(methylsulfanyl)phenyl]‐4,2′:6′,4′′‐terpyridine‐κN¹}zinc(II), [Zn(C₅H₇O₂)₂(C₂₂H₁₇N₃S)₂], (I), and {μ‐4′‐[4‐(methylsulfanyl)phenyl]‐4,2′:6′,4′′‐terpyridine‐κ²N¹:N^1′′}bis[bis(acetylacetonato‐κ²O,O′)zinc(II)], [Zn₂(C₅H₇O₂)₄(C₂₂H₁₇N₃S)], (II), are discrete entities with different nuclearities. Compound (I) consists of two centrosymmetrically related monodentate 4′‐[4‐(methylsulfanyl)phenyl]‐4,2′:6′,4′′‐terpyridine (L1) ligands binding to one Zn^II atom sitting on an inversion centre and two centrosymmetrically related chelating acetylacetonate (acac) groups which bind via carbonyl O‐atom donors, giving an N₂O₄ octahedral environment for Zn^II. Compound (II), however, consists of a bis‐monodentate L1 ligand bridging two Zn^II atoms from two different Zn(acac)₂ fragments. Intra‐ and intermolecular interactions are weak, mainly of the C—H...π and π–π types, mediating similar layered structures. In contrast to related structures in the literature, sulfur‐mediated nonbonding interactions in (II) do not seem to have any significant influence on the supramolecular structure.     

A new two‐dimensional managnese(II) coordination polymer constructed by 2,2′‐(1,2‐phenylene)bis(1H‐imidazole‐4,5‐dicarboxylate)

In recent years, N‐heterocyclic carboxylate ligands have attracted much interest in the preparation of new coordination polymers since they contain N‐atom donors, as well as O‐atom donors, and have a rich variety of coordination modes which can lead to polymers with intriguing structures and interesting properties. A new two‐dimensional coordination polymer, namely poly[[μ₃‐2,2′‐(1,2‐phenylene)bis(4‐carboxy‐1H‐imidazole‐5‐carboxylato)‐κ⁶O⁴,N³,N^3′,O^4′:O⁵:O^5′]manganese(II)], [Mn(C₁₆H₈N₄O₈)]_n or [Mn(H₄Phbidc)]_n, has been synthesized by the reaction of Mn(OAc)₂·4H₂O (OAc is acetate) with 2,2′‐(1,2‐phenylene)bis(1H‐imidazole‐4,5‐dicarboxylic acid) (H₆Phbidc) under solvothermal conditions. In the polymer, each Mn^II ion is six‐coordinated by two N atoms from one H₄Phbidc²⁻ ligand and by four O atoms from three H₄Phbidc²⁻ ligands, forming a significantly distorted octahedral MnN₂O₄ coordination geometry. The Mn^II ions are linked by hexadentate H₄Phbidc²⁻ ligands, leading to a two‐dimensional structure parallel to the ac plane. In the crystal, adjacent layers are further connected by N—H…O hydrogen bonds, forming a three‐dimensional structure in the solid state.     

Two ZnII coordination complexes assembled by trithiocyanuric acid and two different N‐donor auxiliary ligands

The dipyridyl‐type building blocks 4‐amino‐3,5‐bis(pyridin‐3‐yl)‐1,2,4‐triazole (3‐bpt) and 4,4′‐bipyridine (bpy) have been used to assemble with Zn^II in the presence of trithiocyanuric acid (ttcH₃) to afford two coordination compounds, namely bis[4‐amino‐3,5‐bis(pyridin‐3‐yl)‐1,2,4‐triazole‐κN³]bis(trithiocyanurato‐κ²N,S)zinc(II), [Zn(C₃H₂N₃S₃)₂(C₁₂H₁₀N₆)₂]·2H₂O, (1), and catena‐poly[[[bis(trithiocyanurato‐κ²N,S)zinc(II)]‐μ‐4,4′‐bipyridine‐κ²N:N′] 4,4′‐bipyridine monosolvate], {[Zn₂(C₃H₂N₃S₃)₄(C₁₀H₈N₂)₃]·C₁₀H₈N₂}_n, (2). Single‐crystal X‐ray analysis indicates that complex (1) is a mononuclear structure, while complex (2) presents a one‐dimensional chain coordination motif. In both complexes, the central Zn^II cation adopts an octahedral geometry, coordinated by four N‐ and two S‐donor atoms. Notably, trithiocyanurate (ttcH₂⁻) adopts the same bidentate chelating coordination mode in each complex and exists in the thione tautomeric form. The 3‐bpt co‐ligand in (1) adopts a monodentate coordination mode and serves as a terminal pendant ligand, whereas the 4,4′‐bipyridine (bpy) ligand in (2) adopts a bidentate–bridging coordination mode. The different coordination characters of the different N‐donor auxiliary ligands lead to structural diversity for complexes (1) and (2). Further analysis indicates that the resultant three‐dimensional supramolecular networks for (1) and (2) arise through intermolecular N—H...S and N—H...N hydrogen bonds. Both complexes have been further characterized by FT–IR spectroscopy and elemental analyses.     

A two‐dimensional CdII coordination polymer based on naphthalenediimide: synthesis,crystal structure and photochromic properties

Naphthalenediimides, a class of organic dyes with an expanded π‐electron‐deficient plane, have attracted considerable interest because of their photoinduced electron transfer from neutral organic moieties to stable anionic radicals. This makes them excellent candidates for organic linkers in the construction of photochromic coordination polymers. Such a photochromic two‐dimensional coordination polymer has been prepared using N,N′‐bis(pyridin‐4‐ylmethyl)naphthalene‐1,8:4,5‐bis(dicarboximide) (DPMNI). In crystallization tubes, upon slow diffusion of an MeOH solution of cadmium perchlorate into a CHCl₃ solution of DPMNI, the complex poly[[bis[μ₂‐2,7‐bis(pyridin‐4‐ylmethyl)benzo[imn][3,8]phenanthroline‐1,3,6,8(2H,7H)‐tetrone‐κ²N:N′]bis(perchlorato‐κO)cadmium(II)] chloroform tetrasolvate], {[Cd(C₂₆H₁₆N₄O₄)₂(ClO₄)₂]·4CHCl₃}_n, (I), was obtained. The asymmetric unit contains one Cd²⁺ cation, two DPMNI ligands, two coordinated ClO₄⁻ anions and four CHCl₃ solvent molecules. Each Cd²⁺ cation is interconnected by four DPMNI linkers to generate a neutral two‐dimensional naphthalenediimide coordination network with all the ClO₄⁻ anions above or below this plane. Strong interlaminar anion–π interactions between the coordinated ClO₄⁻ anions and the imide rings of an adjacent layer lead to a three‐dimensional supramolecular structure. Compound (I) exhibits reversible photochromic behaviour and photocontrolled tunable luminescence properties, which may originate from the photoinduced electron‐transfer generation of radicals in the DPMNI ligand.     

Synthesis,crystal structures,photoluminescence, electrochemistry and DFT study of aluminium(III) and gallium(III) complexes containing a novel tetradentate Schiff base ligand

Single crystals of the aluminium and gallium complexes of 6,6′‐{(1E,1′E)‐[1,2‐phenylenebis(azanylylidene)]bis(methanylylidene)}bis(2‐methoxyphenol), namely diaqua(6,6′‐{(1E,1′E)‐[1,2‐phenylenebis(azanylylidene)]bis(methanylylidene)}bis(2‐methoxyphenolato)‐κ⁴O¹,N,N′,O^1′)aluminium(III) nitrate ethanol monosolvate, [Al(C₂₂H₁₈N₂O₄)(H₂O)₂]NO₃·C₂H₅OH, 1 , and diaqua(6,6′‐{(1E,1′E)‐[1,2‐phenylenebis(azanylylidene)]bis(methanylylidene)}bis(2‐methoxyphenolato)‐κ⁴O¹,N,N′,O^1′)gallium(III) nitrate ethanol monosolvate, [Ga(C₂₂H₁₈N₂O₄)(H₂O)₂]NO₃·C₂H₅OH, 2 , were obtained after successful synthesis in ethanol. Both complexes crystallized in the triclinic space group P, with two molecules in the asymmetric unit. In both structures, in one of the independent molecules the tetradentate ligand is almost planar while in the other independent molecule the ligand shows significant distortions from planarity, as illustrated by the largest distance from the plane constructed through the central metal atom and the O,N,N′,O′‐coordinating atoms of the ligand in 1 of 1.155 (3) Å and a distance of 1.1707 (3) Å in 2 . The possible reason for this is that there are various strong π‐interactions in the structures. This was confirmed by density functional theory (DFT) calculations, as were the other crystallographic data. DFT was also used to predict the outcome of cyclic voltammetry experiments. Ligand oxidation is more stabilized in the gallium complex. Solid‐state photoluminescence gave an 80 nm red‐shifted spectrum for the gallium complex, whereas the aluminium complex maintains the ligand curve with a smaller red shift of 40 nm.     

One‐dimensional copper(II) coordination polymers based on 1,3‐bis(pyridin‐4‐yl)propane and diimine ligands

Two one‐dimensional (1D) coordination polymers (CPs), namely catena‐poly[[[aqua(2,2′‐bipyridine‐κ²N,N′)(nitrato‐κO)copper(II)]‐μ‐1,3‐bis(pyridin‐4‐yl)propane‐κ²N:N′] nitrate], {[Cu(NO₃)(C₁₀H₈N₂)(C₁₃H₁₄N₂)(H₂O)]·NO₃}_n ( 1 ), and catena‐poly[[[aqua(nitrato‐κO)(1,10‐phenanthroline‐κ²N,N′)copper(II)]‐μ‐1,3‐bis(pyridin‐4‐yl)propane‐κ²N:N′] nitrate], {[Cu(NO₃)(C₁₂H₈N₂)(C₁₃H₁₄N₂)(H₂O)]·NO₃}_n ( 2 ), have been synthesized using [Cu(NO₃)(NN)(H₂O)₂]NO₃, where NN = 2,2′‐bipyridine (bpy) or 1,10‐phenanthroline (phen), as a linker in a 1:1 molar ratio. The CPs were characterized by elemental analysis, IR spectroscopy, thermogravimetric analysis and single‐crystal X‐ray structure determination. The 1,3‐bis(pyridin‐4‐yl)propane (dpp) ligand acts as a bridging ligand, leading to the formation of a 1D polymer. The octahedral coordination sphere around copper consists of two N atoms from bpy for 1 or phen for 2 , two N atoms from dpp, one O atom from water and one O atom from a coordinated nitrate anion. Each structure contains two crystallographically independent chains in the asymmetric unit and the chains are linked via hydrogen bonds into a three‐dimensional network.     

Magnetism and crystal structure of an N3O3‐coordinated iron(II) complex

The reaction of [FeL(MeOH)₂] {where L is the tetradentate N₂O₂‐coordinating Schiff base‐like ligand (E,E)‐diethyl 2,2′‐[1,2‐phenylenebis(nitrilomethylidyne)]bis(3‐oxobutanoate)(2−) and MeOH is methanol} with 3‐aminopyridine (3‐apy) in methanol results in the formation of the octahedral complex (3‐aminopyridine‐κN¹){(E,E)‐diethyl 2,2′‐[1,2‐phenylenebis(nitrilomethylidyne)]bis(3‐oxobutanoato)(2−)‐κ⁴O³,N,N′,O^3′}(methanol‐κO)iron(II), [Fe(C₂₀H₂₂N₂O₆)(C₅H₆N₂)(CH₄O)] or [FeL(3‐apy)(MeOH)], in which the Fe^II ion is centered in an N₃O₃ coordination environment with two different axial ligands. This is the first example of an octahedral complex of this multidentate ligand type with two different axial ligands, and the title compound can be considered as a precursor for a new class of complexes with potential spin‐crossover behavior. An infinite two‐dimensional hydrogen‐bond network is formed, involving the amine NH group, the methanol OH group and the carbonyl O atoms of the equatorial ligand. T‐dependent susceptibility measurements revealed that the complex remains in the high‐spin state over the entire temperature range investigated.     

Synthesis,structure and properties of a new three‐dimensional interpenetrated metal–organic framework with 3,3′‐azodibenzoic acid (H2azdc) and 1,4‐bis(1H‐imidazol‐1‐yl)butane (bimb): {[Cd(azdc)(bimb)2]·H2O}n

A new three‐dimensional interpenetrated Cd^II–organic framework based on 3,3′‐azodibenzoic acid [3,3′‐(diazenediyl)dibenzoic acid, H₂azdc] and the auxiliary flexible ligand 1,4‐bis(1H‐imidazol‐1‐yl)butane (bimb), namely poly[[bis[μ₂‐1,4‐bis(1H‐imidazol‐1‐yl)butane‐κ²N³:N^3′][μ₂‐3,3′‐(diazenediyl)dibenzoato‐κ²O:O′]cadmium(II)] monohydrate], {[Cd(C₁₄H₈N₂O₄)(C₁₀H₁₄N₂)₂]·H₂O}_n, (1), was obtained by a typical solution reaction in mixed solvents (water and N,N′‐dimethylformamide). Each Cd^II centre is six‐coordinated by two O atoms of bis‐monodentate bridging carboxylate groups from two azdc²⁻ ligands and by four N atoms from four bimb ligands, forming an octahedral coordination environment. The Cd^II ions are connected by the bimb ligands, resulting in two‐dimensional (4,4) layers, which are further pillared by the azdc²⁻ ligands, affording a threefold interpenetrated three‐dimensional α‐Po topological framework with the Schläfli symbol 4¹²6³. The thermal stability and solid‐state fluorescence properties of (1) have been investigated.     

Two new isostructural mercury(II) complexes involving the N‐heterocyclic 1‐[(benzotriazol‐1‐yl)methyl]‐1H‐1,3‐imidazole ligand: syntheses,structures and properties

The unsymmetrical N‐heterocyclic ligand 1‐[(benzotriazol‐1‐yl)methyl]‐1H‐1,3‐imidazole (bmi) has three potential N‐atom donors and can act in monodentate or bridging coordination modes in the construction of complexes. In addition, the bmi ligand can adopt different coordination conformations, resulting in complexes with different structures due to the presence of the flexible methylene spacer. Two new complexes, namely bis{1‐[(benzotriazol‐1‐yl)methyl]‐1H‐1,3‐imidazole‐κN ³}dibromidomercury(II), [HgBr₂(C₁₀H₉N₅)₂], and bis{1‐[(benzotriazol‐1‐yl)methyl]‐1H‐1,3‐imidazole‐κN ³}diiodidomercury(II), [HgI₂(C₁₀H₉N₅)₂], have been synthesized through the self‐assembly of bmi with HgBr₂ or HgI₂. Single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction shows that both complexes are mononuclear structures, in which the bmi ligands coordinate to the Hg^II ions in monodentate modes. In the solid state, both complexes display three‐dimensional networks formed by a combination of hydrogen bonds and π–π interactions. The IR spectra and PXRD patterns of both complexes have also been recorded.     

mer‐Diaquabis(1H‐imidazole‐κN3)[orotato(2–)]cobalt(II)

In the title complex, mer‐diaqua[2,6‐dioxo‐1,2,3,6‐tetrahydropyrimidine‐4‐carboxylato(2−)]bis(1H‐imidazole‐κN³)cobalt(II), [Co(C₅H₂N₂O₄)(C₃H₄N₂)₂(H₂O)₂], the Co^II ion is coordinated by a deprotonated N atom and the carboxylate O atom of the orotate ligand, two imidazole N atoms and two aqua ligands in a distorted octahedral geometry. The title complex exists as discrete doubly hydrogen‐bonded dimers, and a three‐dimensional network of O—H...O and N—H...O hydrogen bonds and weak π–π interactions is responsible for crystal stabilization.     

Dimethyl 2,2′‐bipyridine‐6,6′‐dicarboxylate and bis(dimethyl 2,2′‐bipyridine‐6,6′‐dicarboxylato‐κ2N,N′)copper(I) tetrafluoroborate

The single‐crystal X‐ray structures of dimethyl 2,2′‐bipyridine‐6,6′‐dicarboxylate, C₁₄H₁₂N₂O₄, and the copper(I) coordination complex bis(dimethyl 2,2′‐bipyridine‐6,6′‐dicarboxylato‐κ²N,N′)copper(I) tetrafluoroborate, [Cu(C₁₄H₁₂N₂O₄)₂]BF₄, are reported. The uncoordinated ligand crystallizes across an inversion centre and adopts the anticipated anti pyridyl arrangement with coplanar pyridyl rings. In contrast, upon coordination of copper(I), the ligand adopts an arrangement of pyridyl donors facilitating chelating metal coordination and an increased inter‐pyridyl twisting within each ligand. The distortion of each ligand contrasts with comparable copper(I) complexes of unfunctionalized 2,2′‐bipyridine.     

Synthesis,structure and characterization of two new metal–organic coordination polymers based on the ligand 5‐iodobenzene‐1,3‐dicarboxylate

Two new coordination polymers (CPs) formed from 5‐iodobenzene‐1,3‐dicarboxylic acid (H₂iip) in the presence of the flexible 1,4‐bis(1H‐imidazol‐1‐yl)butane (bimb) auxiliary ligand, namely poly[[μ₂‐1,4‐bis(1H‐imidazol‐1‐yl)butane‐κ²N³:N^3′](μ₃‐5‐iodobenzene‐1,3‐dicarboxylato‐κ⁴O¹,O^1′:O³:O^3′)cobalt(II)], [Co(C₈H₃IO₄)(C₁₀H₁₄N₄)]_n or [Co(iip)(bimb)]_n, (1), and poly[[[μ₂‐1,4‐bis(1H‐imidazol‐1‐yl)butane‐κ²N³:N^3′](μ₂‐5‐iodobenzene‐1,3‐dicarboxylato‐κ²O¹:O³)zinc(II)] trihydrate], {[Zn(C₈H₃IO₄)(C₁₀H₁₄N₄)]·3H₂O}_n or {[Zn(iip)(bimb)]·3H₂O}_n, (2), were synthesized and characterized by FT–IR spectroscopy, thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), solid‐state UV–Vis spectroscopy, single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction analysis and powder X‐ray diffraction analysis (PXRD). The iip²⁻ ligand in (1) adopts the (κ¹,κ¹‐μ₂)(κ¹, κ¹‐μ₁)‐μ₃ coordination mode, linking adjacent secondary building units into a ladder‐like chain. These chains are further connected by the flexible bimb ligand in a trans–trans–trans conformation. As a result, a twofold three‐dimensional interpenetrating α‐Po network is formed. Complex (2) exhibits a two‐dimensional (4,4) topological network architecture in which the iip²⁻ ligand shows the (κ¹)(κ¹)‐μ₂ coordination mode. The solid‐state UV–Vis spectra of (1) and (2) were investigated, together with the fluorescence properties of (2) in the solid state.     

One‐pot concomitant preparation of two copper(II) coordination polymers with different configurations of bridging bithiophene ligands

By employing the conjugated bithiophene ligand 5,5′‐bis(1H‐imidazol‐1‐yl)‐2,2′‐bithiophene (bibp), which can exhibit trans and cis conformations, two different Cu^II coordination polymers, namely, poly[[μ‐5,5′‐bis(1H‐imidazol‐1‐yl)‐2,2′‐bithiophene‐κ²N:N′](μ₂‐4,4′‐oxydibenzoato‐κ²O:O′)copper(II)], [Cu(C₁₄H₈O₅)(C₁₄H₁₀N₄S₂)]_n or [Cu(bibp)(oba)]_n, (I), and catena‐poly[μ‐aqua‐bis[μ‐5,5′‐bis(1H‐imidazol‐1‐yl)‐2,2′‐bithiophene‐κ²N:N′]bis(μ₃‐4,4′‐oxydibenzoato)‐κ³O:O′:O′′;κ⁴O:O′,O′′:O′‐dicopper(II)], [Cu₂(C₁₄H₈O₅)₂(C₁₄H₁₀N₄S₂)(H₂O)]_n or [Cu₂(bibp)(oba)₂(H₂O)]_n, (II), have been prepared through one‐pot concomitant crystallization and characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction, IR spectroscopy, elemental analysis, powder X‐ray diffraction (PXRD) and thermogravimetric (TG) analysis. Single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction indicates that the most interesting aspect of the structure is the existence of sole trans and cis conformations of the bibp ligand in a single net of (I) and (II), respectively. Compound (I) displays a threefold interpenetrating three‐dimensional framework with a 4‐connected {6⁵.8} cds topology, whereas (II) features a one‐dimensional chain structure. In the crystal of (II), the polymeric chains are further extended through C—H…O hydrogen bonds and C—H…π interactions into a three‐dimensional supramolecular architecture. In addition, strong intramolecular O—H…O hydrogen bonds formed between the bridging water molecules and the carboxylate O atoms improve the stability of the framework of (II). Furthermore, solid‐state UV–Vis spectroscopy experiments show that compounds (I) and (II) exhibit optical band gaps which are characteristic for optical semiconductors, with values of 2.70 and 2.26 eV, respectively.     

A triangular palladium(II) supramolecular coordination complex based on 1,4‐bis(1H‐imidazol‐1‐yl)benzene and (2,2′‐bipyridyl)palladium(II) nitrate: synthesis and crystal structure

The self‐assembly of ditopic bis(1H‐imidazol‐1‐yl)benzene ligands ( L ^H) and the complex (2,2′‐bipyridyl‐κ²N,N′)bis(nitrato‐κO)palladium(II) affords the supramolecular coordination complex tris[μ‐bis(1H‐imidazol‐1‐yl)benzene‐κ²N³:N^3′]‐triangulo‐tris[(2,2′‐bipyridyl‐κ²N,N′)palladium(II)] hexakis(hexafluoridophosphate) acetonitrile heptasolvate, [Pd₃(C₁₀H₈N₂)₃(C₁₂H₁₀N₄)₃](PF₆)₆·7CH₃CN, 2 . The structure of 2 was characterized in acetonitrile‐d₃ by ¹H/¹³C NMR spectroscopy and a DOSY experiment. The trimeric nature of supramolecular coordination complex 2 in solution was ascertained by cold spray ionization mass spectrometry (CSI–MS) and confirmed in the solid state by X‐ray structure analysis. The asymmetric unit of 2 comprises the trimetallic Pd complex, six PF₆^? counter‐ions and seven acetonitrile solvent molecules. Moreover, there is one cavity within the unit cell which could contain diethyl ether solvent molecules, as suggested by the crystallization process. The packing is stabilized by weak inter‐ and intramolecular C—H…N and C—H…F interactions. Interestingly, the crystal structure displays two distinct conformations for the L ^H ligand (i.e. syn and anti), with an all‐syn‐[Pd] coordination mode. This result is in contrast to the solution behaviour, where multiple structures with syn/anti‐ L ^H and syn/anti‐[Pd] are a priori possible and expected to be in rapid equilibrium.