The ring structure on the cohomology of coordinate subspace arrangements

Every simplicial complex on the vertex set defines a real resp. complex arrangement of coordinate subspaces in resp. via the correspondence The linear structure of the cohomology of the complement of such an arrangement is explicitly given in terms of the combinatorics of and its links by the Goresky–MacPherson formula. Here we derive, by combinatorial means, the ring structure on the integral cohomology in terms of data of . We provide a non-trivial example of different cohomology rings in the real and complex case. Furthermore, we give an example of a coordinate arrangement that yields non-trivial multiplication of torsion elements. Received March 3, 1999; in final form June 24, 1999     

On subspace arrangements of type

Let denote the subspace arrangement formed by all linear subspaces in given by equations of the form

₁x_i1=₂x_i2==_kx_ik,

where 1i₁<<i_kn and (₁,…,_k){+1,−1}^k.Some important topological properties of such a subspace arrangement depend on the topology of its intersection lattice. In a previous work on a larger class of subspace arrangements by Björner and Sagan (J. Algebraic Combin. 5 (1996) 291–314) the topology of the intersection lattice turned out to be a particularly interesting and difficult case.We prove in this paper that Pure(Π_n,k^±) is shellable, hence that Π_n,k^± is shellable for k>n/2. Moreover, we prove that unless i≡n−2 (mod k−2) or i≡n−3 (mod k−2), and that is free abelian for i≡n−2 (mod k−2). In the special case of Π_2k,k^± we determine homology completely. Our tools are generalized lexicographic shellability, as introduced in Kozlov (Ann. Combin. 1 (1997) 67–90), and a spectral sequence method for the computation of poset homology first used in Hanlon (Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 325 (1991) 1–37).We state implications of our results on the cohomology of the complements of the considered arrangements.     

On Hochschild cohomology rings of Fibonacci algebras

Let Λ be a Fibonacci algebra over a field k. The multiplication of Hochschild cohomology ring of Λ induced by the Yoneda product is described explicitly. As a consequence, the multiplicative structure of Hochschild cohomology ring of Λ is proved to be trivial.     

Deletion-restriction for subspace arrangements

Let A be a subspace arrangement in V with a designated maximal affine subspace A₀. Let A^′=A?{A₀} be the deletion of A₀ from A and A^″={A∩A₀|A∩A₀≠∅} be the restriction of A to A₀. Let M=V?_?A∈AA be the complement of A in V. If A is an arrangement of complex affine hyperplanes, then there is a split short exact sequence, 0→Hk(M^′)→Hk(M)→Hk+1−codimR(A₀)(M^″)→0. In this paper, we determine conditions for when the triple (A,A^′,A^″) of arrangements of affine subspaces yields the above split short exact sequence. We then generalize the no-broken-circuit basis nbc of Hk(M) for hyperplane arrangements to deletion-restriction subspace arrangements.     

On the cohomology of joins of operator algebras

By analogy with the join in topology, the join A*B for operator algebras A and B acting on Hilbert spaces H and K, respectively, was defined by Gilfeather and Smith (Amer. J. Math. 116 (1994) 541-561). Assuming that K is finite dimensional, they calculated the Hochschild cohomology groups for A*B with coefficients in L(K⊕H). We assume that A is a maximal abelian von Neumann algebra acting on H, A is a subalgebra of , and B is an ultraweakly closed subalgebra of M_n(A) containing A⊗1_n. We show that B may be decomposed into a finite sum of free modules. In this context, we redefine the join of A and B, generalize the calculations of Gilfeather and Smith, and calculate , for all m?0.     

Derivation radical subspace arrangements

In this note we study modules of derivations on collections of linear subspaces in a finite dimensional vector space. The central aim is to generalize the notion of freeness from hyperplane arrangements to subspace arrangements. We call this generalization ‘derivation radical’. We classify all coordinate subspace arrangements that are derivation radical and show that certain subspace arrangements of the Braid arrangement are derivation radical. We conclude by proving that under an algebraic condition the subspace arrangement consisting of all codimension c intersections, where c is fixed, of a free hyperplane arrangement are derivation radical.     

On the Hochschild cohomology of tame Hecke algebras

We explicitly calculate a projective bimodule resolution for a special biserial algebra giving rise to the Hecke algebra H_q(S₄){{\mathcal H}_q(S_4)} when q = −1. We then determine the dimensions of the Hochschild cohomology groups.     

On the simplicial cohomology of Banach operator algebras

We investigate the simplicial cohomology of certain Banach operator algebras. The two main examples considered are the Banach algebra of all bounded operators on a Banach space and its ideal of approximable operators. Sufficient conditions will be given forcing Banach algebras of this kind to be simplicially trivial.     

Hilbert series of subspace arrangements

The vanishing ideal I of a subspace arrangement V₁∪V₂∪?∪V_m⊆V is an intersection I₁∩I₂∩?∩I_m of linear ideals. We give a formula for the Hilbert polynomial of I if the subspaces meet transversally. We also give a formula for the Hilbert series of the product ideal J=I₁I₂?I_m without any assumptions about the subspace arrangement. It turns out that the Hilbert series of J is a combinatorial invariant of the subspace arrangement: it only depends on the intersection lattice and the dimension function. The graded Betti numbers of J are determined by the Hilbert series, so they are combinatorial invariants as well. We will also apply our results to generalized principal component analysis (GPCA), a tool that is useful for computer vision and image processing.