Planarity of heteroaryldithiocarbazic acid derivatives showing tuberculostatic activity. III. Mono‐ and diesters of 3‐(pyrazin‐2‐ylcarbonyl)dithiocarbazic acid

Methyl 2‐(pyrazin‐2‐ylcarbonyl)hydrazinecarbodithioate, C₇H₈N₄OS₂, (E1), N′‐[bis(methylsulfanyl)methylidene]pyrazine‐2‐carbohydrazide, C₈H₁₀N₄OS₂, (F1), N′‐[bis(methylsulfanyl)methylidene]‐6‐methoxypyrazine‐2‐carbohydrazide, C₉H₁₂N₄O₂S₂, (F2), and methyl 1‐methyl‐2‐(pyrazin‐2‐ylcarbonyl)hydrazinecarbodithioate, C₈H₁₀N₄OS₂, (G1), can be considered as derivatives of classical (thio)amide‐type tuberculostatics, and all are moderately active against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. This study was undertaken in a search for relationships between activity and specific intramolecular interactions, especially conjugations and hydrogen‐bond contacts, and the molecular structures were compared with respective amine analogues, also active against the pathogen. Despite the differences between the amine and carbonyl groups with opposite functions in the hydrogen bond, the two types of structure show a surprisingly similar planar geometry, mostly due to the conjugations aided by the bifurcated intramolecular hydrogen‐bond contact between the N—H group of the central hydrazide group as donor and a pyrazine N atom and an S atom of the dithio function as acceptors. Planarity was suggested to be crucial for the tuberculostatic activity of these compounds. The N‐methylated derivative (G1) showed a significant twist at the N—N bond [torsion angle = −121.9 (3)°] due to the methyl substitution, which precludes an intramolecular N—H...S contact and the planarity of the whole molecule. Nonetheless, the compound shows moderate tuberculostatic activity.     

Planarity of heteroaryldithiocarbazic acid derivatives showing tuberculostatic activity. II. Crystal structures of 3‐[amino(pyrazin‐2‐yl)methylidene]‐2‐methylcarbazic acid esters

Four compounds showing moderate antituberculostatic activity have been studied to test the hypothesis that the planarity of the 2‐[amino(pyrazin‐2‐yl)methylidene]dithiocarbazate fragment is crucial for activity. N′‐Anilinopyrazine‐2‐carboximidamide, C₁₁H₁₁N₅, D1, and diethyl 2,2′‐[({[amino(pyrazin‐2‐yl)methylidene]hydrazinylidene}methylidene)bis(sulfanediyl)]diacetate, C₁₄H₁₉N₅O₄S₂, B1, maintain planarity due to conjugation and attractive intramolecular hydrogen‐bond contacts, while methyl 3‐[amino(pyrazin‐2‐yl)methylidene]‐2‐methyldithiocarbazate, C₈H₁₁N₅S₂, C1, and benzyl 3‐[amino(pyrazin‐2‐yl)methylidene]‐2‐methyldithiocarbazate, C₁₄H₁₅N₅S₂, C2, are not planar, due to methylation at one of the N atoms of the central N—N bond. The resulting twists of the two molecular halves (parts) of C1 and C2 are indicated by torsion angles of 116.5 (2) and −135.9 (2)°, respectively, compared with values of about 180° in the crystal structures of nonsubstituted compounds. As the methylated derivatives show similar activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis to that of the nonsubstituted derivatives, maintaining planarity does not seem to be a prerequisite for activity.     

Planarity of benzoylthiocarbazate tuberculostatics. IV. Polymorphs of N′‐(1,3‐dithiolan‐2‐ylidene)‐4‐nitrobenzohydrazide

The search for new tuberculostatics is important considering the occurrence of drug‐resistant strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis . Three polymorphs of N ′‐(1,3‐dithiolan‐2‐ylidene)‐4‐nitrobenzohydrazide (a potentially tuberculostatic agent), C₁₀H₉N₃O₃S₂, denoted (I1), (I2) and (I3), and the monohydrate of this compound, C₁₀H₉N₃O₃S₂·H₂O, (I4), have been characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. The conformations of the molecules in all these structures are very similar. Structures (I1), (I2) and (I3) provide an example of packing polymorphism resulting from different intermolecular interactions.     

Planarity of benzoylthiocarbazate tuberculostatics. III. Diesters of 3‐(2‐hydroxybenzoyl)dithiocarbazic acid

Searches for new tuberculostatic agents are important considering the occurrence of drug‐resistant strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis . The structures of three new potentially tuberculostatic compounds, namely isopropyl methyl (2‐hydroxybenzoyl)carbonohydrazonodithioate, C₁₂H₁₆N₂O₂S₂, (Z )‐benzyl methyl (2‐hydroxybenzoyl)carbonohydrazonodithioate, C₁₆H₁₆N₂O₂S₂, and dibenzyl (2‐hydroxybenzoyl)carbonohydrazonodithioate propan‐2‐ol monosolvate, C₂₂H₂₀N₂O₂S₂·C₃H₈O, were determined by X‐ray diffraction. The mutual orientation of the three main fragments of the compounds, namely an aromatic ring, a dithioester group and a hydrazide group, can influence the biological activity of the compounds. In all three of the structures studied, the C(=O)NH group is in the anti conformation. In addition, the presence of the hydroxy group in the ortho position of the aromatic ring in all three structures leads to the formation of an intramolecular hydrogen bond stabilizing the planarity of the molecules.     

Planarity of heteroaryldithiocarbazic acid derivatives showing tuberculostatic activity: structure–activity relationships

The search for new tuberculostatics is an important issue due to the increasing resistance of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to existing agents and the resulting spread of the pathogen. Heteroaryldithiocarbazic acid derivatives have shown potential tuberculostatic activity and investigations of the structural aspects of these compounds are thus of interest. Three new examples have been synthesized. The structure of methyl 2‐[amino(pyridin‐3‐yl)methylidene]hydrazinecarbodithioate, C₈H₁₀N₄S₂, at 293 K has monoclinic (P2₁/n) symmetry. It is of interest with respect to antibacterial properties. The structure displays N—H…N and N—H…S hydrogen bonding. The structure of N′‐(pyrrolidine‐1‐carbonothioyl)picolinohydrazonamide, C₁₁H₁₅N₅S, at 100 K has monoclinic (P2₁/n) symmetry and is also of interest with respect to antibacterial properties. The structure displays N—H…S hydrogen bonding. The structure of (Z)‐methyl 2‐[amino(pyridin‐2‐yl)methylidene]‐1‐methylhydrazinecarbodithioate, C₉H₁₃N₄S₂, has triclinic (P) symmetry. The structure displays N—H…S hydrogen bonding.     

Folded conformations due to arene interactions in dissymmetric and symmetric butylidene‐linker models based on pyrazolo[3,4‐d]pyrimidine,purine and 7‐deazapurine

The butylidene‐linker models 1‐[2‐(2,6‐dimethylsulfanyl‐9H‐purin‐9‐yl)‐2‐methylidenepropyl]‐4,6‐bis(methylsulfanyl)‐1H‐pyrazolo[3,4‐d]pyrimidine, C₁₈H₂₀N₈S₄, (XI), 7,7′‐(2‐methylidenepropane‐1,3‐diyl)bis[3‐methyl‐2‐methylsulfanyl‐3H‐pyrrolo[2,3‐d]pyrimidin‐4(7H)‐one], C₂₀H₂₂N₆O₂S₂, (XIV), and 7‐[2‐(4,6‐dimethylsulfanyl‐1H‐pyrazolo[3,4‐d]pyrimidin‐1‐yl)‐2‐methylidenepropyl]‐3‐methyl‐2‐methylsulfanyl‐3H‐pyrrolo[2,3‐d]pyrimidin‐4(7H)‐one, C₁₉H₂₁N₇OS₃, (XV), show folded conformations in solution, as shown by ¹H NMR analysis. This folding carries over to the crystalline state. Intramolecular π–π interactions are observed in all three compounds, but only (XIV) shows additional intramolecular C—H...π interactions in the solid state. As far as can be established, this is the first report incorporating the pyrrolo[2,3‐d]pyrimidine nucleus for such a study. In addition to the π–π interactions, the crystal structures are also stabilized by other weak intermolecular C—H...S/N/O and/or S...N/S interactions.     

Bases,solvates and salts: new benzimidazole‐ and pyridine‐scaffolded ligands

The intermolecular interactions in the structures of a series of Schiff base ligands have been thoroughly studied. These ligands can be obtained in different forms, namely, as the free base 2‐[(2E)‐2‐(1H‐imidazol‐4‐ylmethylidene)‐1‐methylhydrazinyl]pyridine, C₁₀H₁₁N₅, 1 , the hydrates 2‐[(2E)‐2‐(1H‐imidazol‐2‐ylmethylidene)‐1‐methylhydrazinyl]‐1H‐benzimidazole monohydrate, C₁₂H₁₂N₆·H₂O, 2 , and 2‐{(2E)‐1‐methyl‐2‐[(1‐methyl‐1H‐imidazol‐2‐yl)methylidene]hydrazinyl}‐1H‐benzimidazole 1.25‐hydrate, C₁₃H₁₄N₆·1.25H₂O, 3 , the monocationic hydrate 5‐{(1E)‐[2‐(1H‐1,3‐benzodiazol‐2‐yl)‐2‐methylhydrazinylidene]methyl}‐1H‐imidazol‐3‐ium trifluoromethanesulfonate monohydrate, C₁₂H₁₃N₆⁺·CF₃O₃S^?·H₂O, 5 , and the dicationic 2‐{(2E)‐1‐methyl‐2‐[(1H‐imidazol‐3‐ium‐2‐yl)methylidene]hydrazinyl}pyridinium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonate), C₁₀H₁₃N₅²⁺·2CF₃O₃S^?, 6 . The connection between the forms and the preferred intermolecular interactions is described and further studied by means of the calculation of the interaction energies between the neutral and charged components of the crystal structures. These studies show that, in general, the most important contribution to the stabilization energy of the crystal is provided by π–π interactions, especially between charged ligands, while the details of the crystal architecture are influenced by directional interactions, especially relatively strong hydrogen bonds. In one of the structures, a very interesting example of the nontypical F…O interaction was found and its length, 2.859 (2) Å, is one of the shortest ever reported.     

Weak C—H...O and C—H...π hydrogen bonds and π–π stacking interactions in a series of four N′‐[(E)‐(aryl)methylidene]‐N‐methyl‐2‐oxo‐1,3‐oxazolidine‐4‐carbohydrazides

Oxazolidin‐2‐ones are widely used as protective groups for 1,2‐amino alcohols and chiral derivatives are employed as chiral auxiliaries. The crystal structures of four differently substituted oxazolidinecarbohydrazides, namely N′‐[(E)‐benzylidene]‐N‐methyl‐2‐oxo‐1,3‐oxazolidine‐4‐carbohydrazide, C₁₂H₁₂N₃O₃, (I), N′‐[(E)‐2‐chlorobenzylidene]‐N‐methyl‐2‐oxo‐1,3‐oxazolidine‐4‐carbohydrazide, C₁₂H₁₂ClN₃O₃, (II), (4S)‐N′‐[(E)‐4‐chlorobenzylidene]‐N‐methyl‐2‐oxo‐1,3‐oxazolidine‐4‐carbohydrazide, C₁₂H₁₂ClN₃O₃, (III), and (4S)‐N′‐[(E)‐2,6‐dichlorobenzylidene]‐N,3‐dimethyl‐2‐oxo‐1,3‐oxazolidine‐4‐carbohydrazide, C₁₃H₁₃Cl₂N₃O₃, (IV), show that an unexpected mild‐condition racemization from the chiral starting materials has occurred in (I) and (II). In the extended structures, the centrosymmetric phases, which each crystallize with two molecules (A and B) in the asymmetric unit, form A+B dimers linked by pairs of N—H...O hydrogen bonds, albeit with different O‐atom acceptors. One dimer is composed of one molecule with an S configuration for its stereogenic centre and the other with an R configuration, and possesses approximate local inversion symmetry. The other dimer consists of either R,R or S,S pairs and possesses approximate local twofold symmetry. In the chiral structure, N—H...O hydrogen bonds link the molecules into C(5) chains, with adjacent molecules related by a 2₁ screw axis. A wide variety of weak interactions, including C—H...O, C—H...Cl, C—H...π and π–π stacking interactions, occur in these structures, but there is little conformity between them.     

Monodentate and bridging behaviour of the sulfur‐containing ligand 4′‐[4‐(methylsulfanyl)phenyl]‐4,2′:6′,4′′‐terpyridine in two discrete zinc(II) complexes with acetylacetonate

The Zn complexes bis(acetylacetonato‐κ²O,O′)bis{4′‐[4‐(methylsulfanyl)phenyl]‐4,2′:6′,4′′‐terpyridine‐κN¹}zinc(II), [Zn(C₅H₇O₂)₂(C₂₂H₁₇N₃S)₂], (I), and {μ‐4′‐[4‐(methylsulfanyl)phenyl]‐4,2′:6′,4′′‐terpyridine‐κ²N¹:N^1′′}bis[bis(acetylacetonato‐κ²O,O′)zinc(II)], [Zn₂(C₅H₇O₂)₄(C₂₂H₁₇N₃S)], (II), are discrete entities with different nuclearities. Compound (I) consists of two centrosymmetrically related monodentate 4′‐[4‐(methylsulfanyl)phenyl]‐4,2′:6′,4′′‐terpyridine (L1) ligands binding to one Zn^II atom sitting on an inversion centre and two centrosymmetrically related chelating acetylacetonate (acac) groups which bind via carbonyl O‐atom donors, giving an N₂O₄ octahedral environment for Zn^II. Compound (II), however, consists of a bis‐monodentate L1 ligand bridging two Zn^II atoms from two different Zn(acac)₂ fragments. Intra‐ and intermolecular interactions are weak, mainly of the C—H...π and π–π types, mediating similar layered structures. In contrast to related structures in the literature, sulfur‐mediated nonbonding interactions in (II) do not seem to have any significant influence on the supramolecular structure.     

Novel hydrazone derivatives of 7‐hydroxy‐3′,3′‐dimethyl‐3′H‐spiro[chromene‐2,1′‐isobenzofuran]‐8‐carbaldehyde

The structures of new oxaindane spiropyrans derived from 7‐hydroxy‐3′,3′‐dimethyl‐3′H‐spiro[chromene‐2,1′‐isobenzofuran]‐8‐carbaldehyde (SP1), namely N‐benzyl‐2‐[(7‐hydroxy‐3′,3′‐dimethyl‐3′H‐spiro[chromene‐2,1′‐isobenzofuran]‐8‐yl)methylidene]hydrazinecarbothioamide, C₂₇H₂₅N₃O₃S, (I), at 120 (2) K, and N′‐[(7‐hydroxy‐3′,3′‐dimethyl‐3′H‐spiro[chromene‐2,1′‐isobenzofuran]‐8‐yl)methylidene]‐4‐methylbenzohydrazide acetone monosolvate, C₂₇H₂₄N₂O₄·C₃H₆O, (II), at 100 (2) K, are reported. The photochromically active C_spiro—O bond length in (I) is close to that in the parent compound (SP1), and in (II) it is shorter. In (I), centrosymmetric pairs of molecules are bound by two equivalent N—H...S hydrogen bonds, forming an eight‐membered ring with two donors and two acceptors.     

A trinuclear palladium(II) complex containing N,S‐coordinating 2‐(benzylsulfanyl)anilinide and 1,3‐benzothiazole‐2‐thiolate ligands with a central square‐planar PdN4 motif

The reaction of dichlorido(cod)palladium(II) (cod = 1,5‐cyclooctadiene) with 2‐(benzylsulfanyl)aniline followed by heating in N,N‐dimethylformamide (DMF) produces the linear trinuclear Pd₃ complex bis(μ₂‐1,3‐benzothiazole‐2‐thiolato)bis[μ₂‐2‐(benzylsulfanyl)anilinido]dichloridotripalladium(II) N,N‐dimethylformamide disolvate, [Pd₃(C₇H₄NS₂)₂(C₁₃H₁₂NS)₂Cl₂]·2C₃H₇NO. The molecule has symmetry and a Pd...Pd separation of 3.2012 (4) Å. The outer Pd^II atoms have a square‐planar geometry formed by an N,S‐chelating 2‐(benzylsulfanyl)anilinide ligand, a chloride ligand and the thiolate S atom of a bridging 1,3‐benzothiazole‐2‐thiolate ligand, while the central Pd^II core shows an all N‐coordinated square‐planar geometry. The geometry is perfectly planar within the PdN₄ core and the N—Pd—N bond angles differ significantly [84.72 (15)° for the N atoms of ligands coordinated to the same outer Pd atom and 95.28 (15)° for the N atoms of ligands coordinated to different outer Pd atoms]. This trinuclear Pd₃ complex is the first example of one in which 1,3‐benzothiazole‐2‐thiolate ligands are only N‐coordinated to one Pd centre. The 1,3‐benzothiazole‐2‐thiolate ligands were formed in situ from 2‐(benzylsulfanyl)aniline.     

Planarity of benzoylhydrazine–dithiocarbazoate tuberculostatics. I. N′‐Methyl‐substituted 3,4‐dichlorobenzoyl monoesters

Methyl 2‐(3,4‐dichlorobenzoyl)‐1‐methylhydrazinecarbodithioate, C₁₀H₁₀Cl₂N₂OS₂, (F1), butyl 2‐(3,4‐dichlorobenzoyl)‐1‐methylhydrazinecarbodithioate, C₁₃H₁₆Cl₂N₂OS₂, (F2), and 3,4‐dichloro‐N‐(2‐sulfanylidene‐1,3‐thiazinan‐3‐yl)benzamide, C₁₁H₁₀Cl₂N₂OS₂, (F3), were studied by X‐ray diffraction to test our hypothesis that planarity of aryloylhydrazinedithiocarbazic acid esters is a prerequisite for tuberculostatic activity. All compounds examined in this study are inactive and nonplanar due to twists along two specific bonds in the central frame of the molecules. The significant twist at the N—N bond, with an C—N—N—C(S) torsion angle of about 85°, results from repulsion caused by a methyl substituent at the N′ atom of the hydrazide group. The other twist is that within the benzoyl group at the C(O)—Ph bond, i.e. the N—C(=O)—C(phenyl)—C torsion angle: the values found in the studied structures (25–30°) are in agreement with those observed in other compounds containing a similar fragment. As some nonplanar benzoyl derivatives are active, it seems that planarity of the hydrazinedithioate fragment is more important for tuberculostatic activity than planarity of the aryloyl group.     

A bis­(acetyl­acetonato)­uranium(IV) complex of the Schiff base N,N′‐bis(3‐hydroxy­salicyl­idene)‐2‐methyl‐1,2‐propane­di­amine

The title complex, bis­(acetyl­acetonato‐κ²O,O′)[N,N′‐bis(3‐hydroxy‐2‐oxidobenzaldimino)‐2‐methyl‐1,2‐propane­di­amine‐κ⁴N,O,O′,N′]­uranium(IV) tetra­hydro­furan solvate, [U(C₁₈H₁₈N₂O₄)(C₅H₇O₂)₂]·C₄H₈O, is a rare example of a uranium(IV) complex with a compartmental Schiff base. The U atom is located in the N₂O₂ inner site of the hexadentate N,N′‐bis(3‐hydroxy‐2‐oxidobenzaldimino)‐2‐methyl‐1,2‐pro­pane­di­amine group and is bound also to the two O atoms of both acetyl­acetonate moieties, which results in a dodecahedral coordination environment. Centrosymmetric dimers are formed through intermolecular hydrogen bonds that link the terminal uncoordinated hydroxy groups to one another and to the O atoms of the acetyl­acetonate ligands.     

Structural studies of (prop‐2‐en‐1‐yl)bis[(pyridin‐2‐yl)methylidene]amine hetero‐scorpionate copper complexes

The structures of five compounds consisting of (prop‐2‐en‐1‐yl)bis[(pyridin‐2‐yl)methylidene]amine complexed with copper in both the Cu^I and Cu^II oxidation states are presented, namely chlorido{(prop‐2‐en‐1‐yl)bis[(pyridin‐2‐yl)methylidene]amine‐κ³N,N′,N′′}copper(I) 0.18‐hydrate, [CuCl(C₁₅H₁₇N₃)]·0.18H₂O, (1), catena‐poly[[copper(I)‐μ₂‐(prop‐2‐en‐1‐yl)bis[(pyridin‐2‐yl)methylidene]amine‐κ⁵N,N′,N′′:C²,C³] perchlorate acetonitrile monosolvate], {[Cu(C₁₅H₁₇N₃)]ClO₄·CH₃CN}_n, (2), dichlorido{(prop‐2‐en‐1‐yl)bis[(pyridin‐2‐yl)methylidene]amine‐κ³N,N′,N′′}copper(II) dichloromethane monosolvate, [CuCl₂(C₁₅H₁₇N₃)]·CH₂Cl₂, (3), chlorido{(prop‐2‐en‐1‐yl)bis[(pyridin‐2‐yl)methylidene]amine‐κ³N,N′,N′′}copper(II) perchlorate, [CuCl(C₁₅H₁₇N₃)]ClO₄, (4), and di‐μ‐chlorido‐bis({(prop‐2‐en‐1‐yl)bis[(pyridin‐2‐yl)methylidene]amine‐κ³N,N′,N′′}copper(II)) bis(tetraphenylborate), [Cu₂Cl₂(C₁₅H₁₇N₃)₂][(C₆H₅)₄B]₂, (5). Systematic variation of the anion from a coordinating chloride to a noncoordinating perchlorate for two Cu^I complexes results in either a discrete molecular species, as in (1), or a one‐dimensional chain structure, as in (2). In complex (1), there are two crystallographically independent molecules in the asymmetric unit. Complex (2) consists of the Cu^I atom coordinated by the amine and pyridyl N atoms of one ligand and by the vinyl moiety of another unit related by the crystallographic screw axis, yielding a one‐dimensional chain parallel to the crystallographic b axis. Three complexes with Cu^II show that varying the anion composition from two chlorides, to a chloride and a perchlorate to a chloride and a tetraphenylborate results in discrete molecular species, as in (3) and (4), or a bridged bis‐μ‐chlorido complex, as in (5). Complex (3) shows two strongly bound Cl atoms, while complex (4) has one strongly bound Cl atom and a weaker coordination by one perchlorate O atom. The large noncoordinating tetraphenylborate anion in complex (5) results in the core‐bridged Cu₂Cl₂ moiety.     

Synthesis and characterization of a cadmium(II)–organic supramolecular coordination compound based on the multifunctional 2‐amino‐5‐sulfobenzoic acid ligand

Much attention has been paid by chemists to the construction of supramolecular coordination compounds based on the multifunctional ligand 5‐sulfosalicylic acid (H₃SSA) due to the structural and biological interest of these compounds. However, no coordination compounds have been reported for the multifunctional amino‐substituted sulfobenzoate ligand 2‐amino‐5‐sulfobenzoic acid (H₂asba). We expected that H₂asba could be a suitable building block for the assembly of supramolecular networks due to its interesting structural characteristics. The reaction of cadmium(II) nitrate with H₂asba in the presence of the auxiliary flexible dipyridylamide ligand N,N′‐bis[(pyridin‐4‐yl)methyl]oxamide (4bpme) under ambient conditions formed a new mixed‐ligand coordination compound, namely bis(3‐amino‐4‐carboxybenzenesulfonato‐κO¹)diaquabis{N,N′‐bis[(pyridin‐4‐yl)methyl]oxamide‐κN}cadmium(II)–N,N′‐bis[(pyridin‐4‐yl)methyl]oxamide–water (1/1/4), [Cd(C₇H₆NO₅S)₂(C₁₄H₁₄N₄O₂)₂(H₂O)₂]·C₁₄H₁₄N₄O₂·4H₂O, (1), which was characterized by single‐crystal and powder X‐ray diffraction analysis (PXRD), FT–IR spectroscopy, thermogravimetric analysis (TG), and UV–Vis and photoluminescence spectroscopic analyses in the solid state. The central Cd^II atom in (1) occupies a special position on a centre of inversion and exhibits a slightly distorted octahedral geometry, being coordinated by two N atoms from two monodentate 4bpme ligands, four O atoms from two monodentate 4‐amino‐3‐carboxybenzenesulfonate (Hasba⁻) ligands and two coordinated water molecules. Interestingly, complex (1) further extends into a threefold polycatenated 0D→2D (0D is zero‐dimensional and 2D is two‐dimensional) interpenetrated supramolecular two‐dimensional (4,4) layer through intermolecular hydrogen bonding. The interlayer hydrogen bonding further links adjacent threefold polycatenated two‐dimensional layers into a three‐dimensional network. The optical properties of complex (1) indicate that it may be used as a potential indirect band gap semiconductor material. Complex (1) exhibits an irreversible dehydration–rehydration behaviour. The fluorescence properties have also been investigated in the solid state at room temperature.     

Supramolecular structures of bis‐thionooxalamic acid esters derived from (±)‐cyclohexane‐1,2‐diamine and (±)‐1,2‐diphenylethylenediamine

The bis‐thionooxalamic acid esters trans‐(±)‐diethyl N,N′‐(cyclohexane‐1,2‐diyl)bis(2‐thiooxamate), C₁₄H₂₂N₂O₄S₂, and (±)‐N,N′‐diethyl (1,2‐diphenylethane‐1,2‐diyl)bis(2‐thiooxamate), C₂₂H₂₄N₂O₄S₂, both consist of conformationally flexible molecules which adopt similar conformations with approximate C₂ rotational symmetry. The thioamide and ester parts of the thiooxamate group are significantly twisted along the central C—C bond, with the S=C—C=O torsion angles in the range 30.94 (19)–44.77 (19)°. The twisted s‐cis conformation of the thionooxamide groups facilitates assembly of molecules into a one‐dimensional polymeric structure via intermolecular three‐center C=S...NH...O=C hydrogen bonds and C—H...O interactions formed between molecules of the opposite chirality.     

A novel binuclear copper complex incorporating a nalidixic acid derivative displaying a one‐dimensional coordination polymeric structure

The identification of the antibacterial action of nalidixic acid (nx) was central to the development of the quinolone antibacterial compounds. The ability of the nx naphthyridyl ring to interact with and inhibit some proteins has encouraged the investigation of similar structures in the search for more active compounds with less adverse effects. The possibility of structural modification by attachment of other biologically active moieties to the naphthyridyl ring of nx allowed the development of new active antimicrobial molecules. Hydrazone derivatives of nx can be synthesized easily based on the condensation of the hydrazide derivative of nx with the desired aldehyde or ketone. Only a few complexes with nx hydrazone derivatives have been described but for none were the crystal structures elucidated. The synthesis of a new one‐dimensional Cu^II coordination polymer, namely catena‐poly[[copper(II)‐di‐μ‐chlorido‐copper(II)‐{μ‐1‐ethyl‐N′‐[(1H‐imidazol‐4‐yl)methylidene]‐7‐methyl‐4‐oxo‐1,4‐dihydro‐1,8‐naphthyridine‐3‐carbohydrazidato}‐[dimethanolcopper(II)]‐{μ‐1‐ethyl‐N′‐[(1H‐imidazol‐3‐yl)methylidene]‐7‐methyl‐4‐oxo‐1,4‐dihydro‐1,8‐naphthyridine‐3‐carbohydrazidato}] dichloride methanol tetrasolvate], {[Cu₃(C₁₆H₁₅N₆O₂)₂Cl₂(CH₃OH)₂]Cl₂·4CH₃OH}_n, with the (1H‐imidazol‐4‐yl)methylidene carbohydrazide derivative of nalidixic acid (denoted h4imi), is presented and its structure is compared to the density functional theory (DFT) optimized structure of free h4imi. The title structure presents an octahedral Cu^II ion on an inversion centre alternating along a polymer chain with a square‐pyramidal Cu^II ion, with the two Cu^II centres bridged by two chloride ligands. Hydrogen bonds involving chloride counter‐ions and methanol solvent molecules mediate the three‐dimensional packing of the polymer. Comparison of the geometrical results from the structure analysis with those derived from a DFT study of the free ligand reveal the differences that arise upon coordination.     

Synthesis,crystal structures,antiproliferative activities and reverse docking studies of eight novel Schiff bases derived from benzil

Eight novel Schiff bases derived from benzil dihydrazone ( BDH ) or benzil monohydrazone ( BMH ) and four fused‐ring carbonyl compounds (3‐formylindole, FI ; 3‐acetylindole, AI ; 3‐formyl‐1‐methylindole, MFI ; 1‐formylnaphthalene, FN ) were synthesized and characterized by elemental analysis, ESI–QTOF–MS, ¹H and ¹³C NMR spectroscopy, as well as single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. They are (1Z,2Z)‐1,2‐bis{(E)‐[(1H‐indol‐3‐yl)methylidene]hydrazinylidene}‐1,2‐diphenylethane ( BDHFI ), C₃₂H₂₄N₆, (1Z,2Z)‐1,2‐bis{(E)‐[1‐(1H‐indol‐3‐yl)ethylidene]hydrazinylidene}‐1,2‐diphenylethane ( BDHAI ), C₃₄H₂₈N₆, (1Z,2Z)‐1,2‐bis{(E)‐[(1‐methyl‐1H‐indol‐3‐yl)methylidene]hydrazinylidene}‐1,2‐diphenylethane ( BMHMFI ) acetonitrile hemisolvate, C₃₄H₂₈N₆·0.5CH₃CN, (1Z,2Z)‐1,2‐bis{(E)‐[(naphthalen‐1‐yl)methylidene]hydrazinylidene}‐1,2‐diphenylethane ( BDHFN ), C₃₆H₂₆N₄, (Z)‐2‐{(E)‐[(1H‐indol‐3‐yl)methylidene]hydrazinylidene}‐1,2‐diphenylethanone ( BMHFI ), C₂₃H₁₇N₃O, (Z)‐2‐{(E)‐[1‐(1H‐indol‐3‐yl)ethylidene]hydrazinylidene}‐1,2‐diphenylethanone ( BMHAI ), C₂₄H₁₉N₃O, (Z)‐2‐{(E)‐[(1‐methyl‐1H‐indol‐3‐yl)methylidene]hydrazinylidene}‐1,2‐diphenylethanone ( BMHMFI ), C₂₄H₁₉N₃O, and (Z)‐2‐{(E)‐[(naphthalen‐1‐yl)methylidene]hydrazinylidene}‐1,2‐diphenylethanone ( BMHFN ) C₂₅H₁₈N₂O. Moreover, the in vitro cytotoxicity of the eight title compounds was evaluated against two tumour cell lines (A549 human lung cancer and 4T₁ mouse breast cancer) and two normal cell lines (MRC‐5 normal lung cells and NIH 3T3 fibroblasts) by MTT assay. The results indicate that four ( BDHMFI , BDHFN , BMHMFI and BMHFN ) are inactive and the other four ( BDHFI , BDHAI , BMHFI and BMHAI ) show severe toxicities against human A549 and mouse 4T₁ cells, similar to the standard cisplatin. All the compounds exhibited weaker cytotoxicity against normal cells than cancer cells. The Swiss Target Prediction web server was applied for the prediction of protein targets. After analyzing the differences in frequency hits between these active and inactive Schiff bases, 18 probable targets were selected for reverse docking with the Surflex‐dock function in SYBYL‐X 2.0 software. Three target proteins, i.e. human ether‐á‐go‐go‐related (hERG) potassium channel, the inhibitor of apoptosis protein 3 and serine/threonine‐protein kinase PIM1, were chosen as the targets. Finally, the ligand‐based structure–activity relationships were analyzed based on the putative protein target (hERG) docking results, which will be used to design and synthesize novel hERG ion channel inhibitors.     

Two nickel(II) bis[(pyridin‐2‐yl)methyl]amine complexes with homophthalic and benzene‐1,2,4,5‐tetracarboxylic acids

Two new Ni^II complexes involving the ancillary ligand bis[(pyridin‐2‐yl)methyl]amine (bpma) and two different carboxylate ligands, i.e. homophthalate [hph; systematic name: 2‐(2‐carboxylatophenyl)acetate] and benzene‐1,2,4,5‐tetracarboxylate (btc), namely catena‐poly[[aqua{bis[(pyridin‐2‐yl)methyl]amine‐κ³N,N′,N′′}nickel(II)]‐μ‐2‐(2‐carboxylatophenyl)aceteto‐κ²O:O′], [Ni(C₉H₆O₄)(C₁₂H₁₃N₃)(H₂O)]_n, and (μ‐benzene‐1,2,4,5‐tetracarboxylato‐κ⁴O¹,O²:O⁴,O⁵)bis(aqua{bis[(pyridin‐2‐yl)methyl]amine‐κ³N,N′,N′′}nickel(II)) bis(triaqua{bis[(pyridin‐2‐yl)methyl]amine‐κ³N,N′,N′′}nickel(II)) benzene‐1,2,4,5‐tetracarboxylate hexahydrate, [Ni₂(C₁₀H₂O₈)(C₁₂H₁₃N₃)₂(H₂O)₂]·[Ni(C₁₂H₁₃N₃)(H₂O)₃]₂(C₁₀H₂O₈)·6H₂O, (II), are presented. Compound (I) is a one‐dimensional polymer with hph acting as a bridging ligand and with the chains linked by weak C—H...O interactions. The structure of compound (II) is much more complex, with two independent Ni^II centres having different environments, one of them as part of centrosymmetric [Ni(bpma)(H₂O)]₂(btc) dinuclear complexes and the other in mononuclear [Ni(bpma)(H₂O)₃]²⁺ cations which (in a 2:1 ratio) provide charge balance for btc⁴⁻ anions. A profuse hydrogen‐bonding scheme, where both coordinated and crystal water molecules play a crucial role, provides the supramolecular linkage of the different groups.     

Structural studies and antileishmanial activity of 2‐acetylpyridine and 2‐benzoylpyridine nitroimidazole‐derived hydrazones

Three imidazole hydrazone compounds, namely 2‐(4‐nitro‐1H‐imidazol‐1‐yl)‐N′‐[1‐(pyridin‐2‐yl)ethylidene]acetohydrazide, C₁₂H₁₂N₆O₃, ( 1 ), 2‐(2‐nitro‐1H‐imidazol‐1‐yl)‐N′‐[1‐(pyridin‐2‐yl)ethylidene]acetohydrazide, C₁₂H₁₂N₆O₃, ( 2 ), and 2‐(2‐nitro‐1H‐imidazol‐1‐yl)‐N′‐[(phenyl)(pyridin‐2‐yl)methylidene]acetohydrazide, C₁₇H₁₄N₆O₃, ( 3 ), were obtained and fully characterized, including their crystal structure determinations. While all the compounds proved not to be cytotoxic to J774.A1 macrophage cells, ( 1 ) and ( 3 ) exhibited activity against Leishmania chagasi, whereas ( 2 ) was revealed to be inactive. Since both ( 1 ) and ( 3 ) exhibited antileishmanial effects, while ( 2 ) was devoid of activity, the presence of the acetyl or benzoyl groups was possibly not a determining factor in the observed antiprotozoal activity. In contrast, since ( 1 ) and ( 3 ) are 4‐nitroimidazole derivatives and ( 2 ) is a 2‐nitroimidazole‐derived compound, the presence of the 4‐nitro group probably favours antileishmanial activity over the 2‐nitro group. The results suggested that further investigations on compounds ( 1 ) and ( 3 ) as bioreducible antileishmanial prodrug candidates are called for.