N‐(2‐Hydroxyethyl)‐N‐methyldithiocarbamato Complexes of Nickel(II) with Phosphorus Donor Ligands

Planar nickel(II) complexes involving N‐(2‐Hydroxyethyl)‐N‐methyldithiocarbamate, such as [NiX(nmedtc)(PPh₃)] (X = Cl, NCS; PPh₃ = triphenylphosphine), and [Ni(nmedtc)(P‐P)]ClO₄(P‐P = 1,1‐bis(diphenylphosphino)methane(dppm); 1,3‐bis(diphenylphosphino)propane (1,3‐dppp); 1,4‐bis(diphenylphosphino)butane(1,4‐dppb) have been synthesized. The complexes have been characterized by elemental analyses, IR and electronic spectroscopies. The increased νC–N value in all the complexes is due to the mesomeric drift of electrons from the dithiocarbamate ligands to the metal atom. Single crystal X‐ray structure of [Ni(nmedtc)(1,3‐dppp)]ClO₄·H₂O is reported. In the present 1,3‐dppp chelate, the P–Ni–P angle is higher than that found in 1,2‐bis(diphenylphosphino)ethane‐nickel chelates and lower than 1,4‐bis(diphenylphosphino)butane‐nickel chelates, as a result of presence of the flexible propyl back bone connecting the two phosphorus atoms of the complex.     

Pd(0)‐catalyzed polyaddition of bifunctional vinyloxiranes with 1,3‐dicarbonyl compounds: The synthesis of polymers containing hydroxy and carbonyl groups

The palladium(0)‐catalyzed polyaddition of bifunctional vinyloxiranes [1,4‐bis(2‐vinylepoxyethyl)benzene ( 1a ) and 1,4‐bis(1‐methyl‐2‐vinylepoxyethyl)benzene ( 1b )] with 1,3‐dicarbonyl compounds [methyl acetoacetate ( 4 ), dimethyl malonate ( 6 ), and Meldrum's acid ( 8 )] was investigated under various conditions. The polyaddition of 1 with 4 was carried out in tetrahydrofuran with phosphine ligands such as PPh₃ and 1,2‐bis(diphenylphosphino)ethane (dppe). Polymers having hydroxy, ketone, and ester groups in the side groups ( 5 ) were obtained in good yields despite the kinds of ligands employed. The number‐average molecular weight value of 5b was higher than that of 5a . The polyaddition of 1b and 6 was affected by the kinds of ligands employed. The corresponding polymer 7b was not obtained when PPh₃ and 1,2‐bis(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene were used. The polyaddition was carried out with dppe as the ligand and gave polymer 7b in a good yield. The molecular weight of the polymer obtained from 1b and 8 was much higher than those of polymers 5b and 7b . The polyaddition with Pd₂(dba)₃ · CHCl₃/dppe as a catalyst (where dba is dibenzylideneacetone) produced polymer 9b in a 92% yield (number‐average molecular weight = 45,600). The stereochemistries of all the obtained polymers were confirmed as an E configuration by the coupling constant of the vinyl proton. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 40: 2487–2494, 2002     

Preparation and Characterization of a Novel Palladium Complex: cis‐Dichloride(1,2‐bis(diphenylphosphino)vinyl‐P,P′,C)palladium(II)‐(bis(diphenylphosphino)methane‐P,P′)cobaltacarbonyl

A novel palladium complex 4, cis‐dichloride(1,2‐bis(diphenylphosphino)vinyl‐P,P′,C)palladium(II)‐(bis(diphenylphosphino)methane‐P,P′)cobaltacarbonyl, was obtained and characterized from the treatment of [(μ‐Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂)Co₂(CO)₄][(Ph₂PC≡CPPh₂)‐PdCl₂] 3 with hydrochloric acid. The framework of 4 can be regarded as a grouping of two metal‐containing fragments: ‐Co(CO)₂(dppm) and PdCl2(μ‐P,P‐Ph₂PCH=C(‐)PPh₂).     

Inhibition of a palladium(II) catalyst upon formation of a di‐μ‐chloro complex: di‐μ‐chloro‐bis­[1,2‐bis­(di­phenyl­phosphino)­ethane‐P,P′]dipalladium(II) bis­(tetra­fluoro­borate) bis­(deutero­chloro­form) solvate

The title compound was formed upon slow evaporation of a solution of the solvated dicationic complex bis­(aceto­nitrile)­bis­[1,2‐bis­(di­phenyl‐phosphino)­ethane]­palladium(II) bis(tetra­fluoro­borate) in deuterated chloro­form. The dinucleur palladium complex forms triclinic crystals and there is an inversion center between the Pd atoms. Compared to the corresponding monomeric compound, the Cl—Pd—Cl angles decrease upon briding from 94.19 (7) to 86.96 (4)°.     

Molecular structure determination of Ni(II) diimine complex and DMA analysis of Ni(II) diimine‐based polyethenes

Dynamic mechanical thermoanalysis showed that polyethene, prepared under suitable polymerization conditions with the Brookhart‐type catalyst dibromo‐N,N′‐1,2‐acenaphthylenediylidenebis[2,6‐bis(1‐methylethyl)benzeneamine]Ni(II)/methylaluminoxane (MAO), behaved like an elastomer, even though no comonomer was added. A structural characterization showed that the polymers contained methyl to hexyl branches and some longer branches. The effect of the polymerization conditions on branching was investigated through variations in the pressure and temperature of the polymerization. Depending on the degree and type of branching, polyethene was either quite amorphous or highly crystalline with a high melting temperature. The solid‐state structure of the catalyst dibromo‐N,N′‐1,2‐acenaphthylenediylidenebis[2,6‐bis(1‐methylethyl)benzeneamine]Ni(II) consisted of two centrosymmetrically related monomeric moieties, where Ni atoms were bridged by two bromide ligands. The Ni atom was five‐coordinated, with a square pyramidal coordination polyhedron. The sixth coordination site of the octahedral geometry was effectively blocked by the isopropyl groups of the 2,6‐C₆H₃(i‐Pr) substituents of the diimine ligand. In solution in the presence of MAO, the longer bridging Ni? Br bonds broke, and the complex dissociated to a monomeric species. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Polym Sci A: Polym Chem 39: 1426–1434, 2001     

A halide‐free pyridinium‐substituted η3‐cycloheptatrienide–Pd complex

We report the synthesis and characterization of a novel 4‐(dimethylamino)pyridinium‐substituted η³‐cycloheptatrienide–Pd complex which is free of halide ligands. Diacetonitrile{η³‐[4‐(dimethylamino)pyridinium‐1‐yl]cycloheptatrienido}palladium(II) bis(tetrafluoroborate), [Pd(C₂H₃N)₂(C₁₄H₁₆N₂)](BF₄)₂, was prepared by the exchange of two bromide ligands for noncoordinating anions, which results in the empty coordination sites being occupied by acetonitrile ligands. As described previously, exchange of only one bromide leads to a dimeric complex, di‐μ‐bromido‐bis({η³‐[4‐(dimethylamino)pyridinium‐1‐yl]cycloheptatrienido}palladium(II)) bis(tetrafluoroborate) acetonitrile disolvate, [Pd₂Br₂(C₁₄H₁₆N₂)₂](BF₄)₂·2CH₃CN, with bridging bromide ligands, and the crystal structure of this compound is also reported here. The structures of the cycloheptatrienide ligands of both complexes are analogous to the dibromide derivative, showing the allyl bond in the β‐position with respect to the pyridinium substituent. This indicates that, unlike a previous interpretation, the main reason for the formation of the β‐isomer cannot be internal hydrogen bonding between the cationic substituents and bromide ligands.     

Syntheses and X‐ray Structure Analyses of the First Bis(chelated) Copper and Iron Bisguanidine Complexes

The synthesis of N¹,N²‐bis(1,3‐dimethylimidazolidin‐2‐ylidene)ethane‐1,2‐diamine and the synthesis and structure determination of bis{N¹,N²‐bis(1,3‐dimethylimidazolidin‐2‐ylidene)ethane‐1,2‐diamine}copper(II)‐tetraiododicuprate(I) ([Cu(DMEG₂e)₂][Cu₂I₄]) and bis{N¹,N²‐bis(1,3‐dimethylimidazolidin‐2‐ylidene)ethane‐1,2‐diamine}iron(II)‐octacarbonyl‐diferrate(‐I) ([Fe(DMEG₂e)₂][Fe₂(CO)₈]) which represent the first bis(chelated) bisguanidine complexes are described. The dicationic [M(DMEG₂e)₂]²⁺ molecules with M = Cu, Fe follow the same structural principles and thus differ in their coordination geometries from ideal‐typical expectations.     

An activated catalyst RhH(PPh3)4‐dppe‐ Me2S2 for α‐methylthiolaton of α‐phenyl ketones

In the presence of catalytic amounts of RhH(PPh₃)₄, 1,2‐bis(diphenylphosphino)ethane (dppe), and dimethyl disulfide, cyclic and acyclic α‐phenyl ketones reacted with p‐cyano‐α‐methylthioa‐ cetophenone giving α‐methylthio‐α‐phenylketones. The activated catalyst containing dimethyl disulfide was effective for the α‐methylthiolation reaction of these less reactive substrates. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Heteroatom Chem 22:18–23, 2011; View this article online at wileyonlinelibrary.com . DOI 10.1002/hc.20650     

Syntheses and Structures of Ruthenium(II) N,S‐Heterocyclic Carbene Diphosphine Complexes and their Catalytic Activity towards Transfer Hydrogenation

Phosphine exchange of [Ru^IIBr(MeCOO)(PPh₃)₂(3‐RBzTh)] (3‐RBzTh=3‐benzylbenzothiazol‐2‐ylidene) with a series of diphosphines (bis(diphenylphosphino)methane (dppm), 1,2‐bis(diphenylphosphino)ethylene (dppv), 1,1′‐bis(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene (dppf), 1,4‐bis(diphenylphosphino)butane (dppb), and 1,3‐(diphenylphosphino)propane (dppp)) gave mononuclear and neutral octahedral complexes [RuBr(MeCOO)(η²‐P₂)(3‐RBzTh)] (P₂=dppm ( 2 ), dppv ( 3 ), dppf ( 4 ), dppb ( 5 ), or dppp ( 6 )), the coordination spheres of which contained four different ligands, namely, a chelating diphosphine, carboxylate, N,S‐heterocyclic carbene (NSHC), and a bromide. Two geometric isomers of 6 ( 6a and 6 b ) have been isolated. The structures of these products, which have been elucidated by single‐crystal X‐ray crystallography, show two structural types, I and II, depending on the relative dispositions of the ligands. Type I structures contain a carbenic carbon atom trans to the oxygen atom, whereas two phosphorus atoms are trans to bromine and oxygen atoms. The type II system comprises a carbene carbon atom trans to one of the phosphorus atoms, whereas the other phosphorus is trans to the oxygen atom, with the bromine trans to the remaining oxygen atom. Complexes 2 , 3 , 4 , and 6a belong to type I, whereas 5 and 6 b are of type II. The kinetic product 6 b eventually converts into 6a upon standing. These complexes are active towards catalytic reduction of para‐methyl acetophenone by 2‐propanol at 82 °C under 1 % catalyst load giving the corresponding alcohols. The dppm complex 2 shows the good yields (91–97 %) towards selected ketones.     

Investigations of Scope and Mechanism of Nickel‐Catalyzed Transformations of Glycosyl Trichloroacetimidates to Glycosyl Trichloroacetamides and Subsequent,Atom‐Economical,One‐Step Conversion to α‐Urea‐Glycosides

The development and mechanistic investigation of a highly stereoselective methodology for preparing α‐linked‐urea neo‐glycoconjugates and pseudo‐oligosaccharides is described. This two‐step procedure begins with the selective nickel‐catalyzed conversion of glycosyl trichloroacetimidates to the corresponding α‐trichloroacetamides. The α‐selective nature of the conversion is controlled with a cationic nickel(II) catalyst, [Ni(dppe)(OTf)₂] (dppe=1,2‐bis(diphenylphosphino)ethane, OTf=triflate). Mechanistic studies have identified the coordination of the nickel catalyst with the equatorial C₂‐ether functionality of the α‐glycosyl trichloroacetimidate to be paramount for achieving an α‐stereoselective transformation. A cross‐over experiment has indicated that the reaction does not proceed in an exclusively intramolecular fashion. The second step in this sequence is the direct conversion of α‐glycosyl trichloroacetamide products into the corresponding α‐urea glycosides by reacting them with a wide variety of amine nucleophiles in presence of cesium carbonate. Only α‐urea‐product formation is observed, as the reaction proceeds with complete retention of stereochemical integrity at the anomeric C?N bond.     

Reaktion von Bis(methylzink)‐1,2‐dipyridyl‐1,2‐bis(tert‐butyldimethylsilylamido)ethan mit Triisopropylsilylphosphan und ‐arsan

Reaction of Bis(methylzinc)‐1,2‐dipyridyl‐1,2‐bis(tert‐butyldimethylsilylamido)ethane with Triisopropylsilylphosphane and ‐arsane The reaction of bis(methylzinc)‐1,2‐dipyridyl‐1,2‐bis(tert‐butyldimethylsilylamido)ethane ( 1 ) with triisopropylsilylphosphane gives the three‐nuclear complex [1,2‐dipyridyl‐1,2‐bis(tert‐butyldimethylsilylamido)ethane]trizinc‐bis(μ‐triisopropylsilylphosphanediide) ( 2 ). Two zinc atoms show the coordination number of four whereas the third metal center is located between the two phosphorus atoms with a bent P–Zn–P‐moiety. The reaction of 1 with triisopropylsilylarsane proceeds analoguesly, however, we were not able to isolate analytically pure [1,2‐dipyridyl‐1,2‐bis(tert‐butyldimethylsilylamido)ethane]trizinc‐bis(μ‐triisopropylsilylarsanediide) ( 3 ).     

Tin(II) Halide Insertion or Halogen Exchange in the Reactions of Dihaloplatinum(II) Complexes with Tin(II) Halide

Reactions of SnCl₂ with the complexes cis‐[PtCl₂(P₂)] (P₂=dppf (1,1′‐bis(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene), dppp (1,3‐bis(diphenylphosphino)propane=1,1′‐(propane‐1,3‐diyl)bis[1,1‐diphenylphosphine]), dppb (1,4‐bis(diphenylphosphino)butane=1,1′‐(butane‐1,4‐diyl)bis[1,1‐diphenylphosphine]), and dpppe (1,5‐bis(diphenylphosphino)pentane=1,1′‐(pentane‐1,5‐diyl)bis[1,1‐diphenylphosphine])) resulted in the insertion of SnCl₂ into the Pt? Cl bond to afford the cis‐[PtCl(SnCl₃)(P₂)] complexes. However, the reaction of the complexes cis‐[PtCl₂(P₂)] (P₂=dppf, dppm (bis(diphenylphosphino)methane=1,1′‐methylenebis[1,1‐diphenylphosphine]), dppe (1,2‐bis(diphenylphosphino)ethane=1,1′‐(ethane‐1,2‐diyl)bis[1,1‐diphenylphosphine]), dppp, dppb, and dpppe; P=Ph₃P and (MeO)₃P) with SnX₂ (X=Br or I) resulted in the halogen exchange to yield the complexes [PtX₂(P₂)]. In contrast, treatment of cis‐[PtBr₂(dppm)] with SnBr₂ resulted in the insertion of SnBr₂ into the Pt? Br bond to form cis‐[Pt(SnBr₃)₂(dppm)], and this product was in equilibrium with the starting complex cis‐[PtBr₂(dppm)]. Moreover, the reaction of cis‐[PtCl₂(dppb)] with a mixture SnCl₂/SnI₂ in a 2 : 1 mol ratio resulted in the formation of cis‐[PtI₂(dppb)] as a consequence of the selective halogen‐exchange reaction. ³¹P‐NMR Data for all complexes are reported, and a correlation between the chemical shifts and the coupling constants was established for mono‐ and bis(trichlorostannyl)platinum complexes. The effect of the alkane chain length of the ligand and Sn^II halide is described.     

Hydrogen bonding and π–π interactions in the cocrystal salt [Fe(bpe)2(H2O)4](TCEP)2·2(bpe) [bpe is trans‐1,2‐bis(pyridin‐4‐yl)ethene and TCEP is 1,1,3,3‐tetracyano‐2‐ethoxypropenide]

The cocrystal salt tetraaquabis[trans‐1,2‐bis(pyridin‐4‐yl)ethene‐κN]iron(II) bis(1,1,3,3‐tetracyano‐2‐ethoxypropenide)–trans‐1,2‐bis(pyridin‐4‐yl)ethene (1/2), [Fe(C₁₂H₁₀N₂)₂(H₂O)₄](C₉H₅N₄O)₂·2C₁₂H₁₀N₂, is a rare example of a mononuclear Fe^II compound with trans‐1,2‐bis(pyridin‐4‐yl)ethane (bpe) ligands. The complex cation resides on a crystallographically imposed inversion center and exhibits a tetragonally distorted octahedral coordination geometry. Both the symmetry‐independent bpe ligand and the cocrystallized bpe molecule are essentially planar. The 1,1,3,3‐tetracyano‐2‐ethoxypropenide counter‐ion is nonplanar and the bond lengths are consistant with significant electron delocalization. The extended structure exhibits an extensive O—H…N hydrogen‐bonding network with layers of complex cations joined by the cocrystallized bpe. Both the coordinated and the cocrystallized bpe are involved in π–π interactions. Hirshfeld and fingerprint plots reveal the important intermolecular interactions. Density functional theory was used to estimate the strengths of the hydrogen‐bonding and π–π interactions, and suggest that the O—H…N hydrogen bonds enhance the strength of the π‐interactions by increasing the polarization of the pyridine rings.     

C—H…Cl Hydrogen Bond and π-π Interaction Based Two 3D Supramolecular Architectures of Cu(II) and Co(II) Complexes with Chiral 1,2-Bis(benzimidazol-2-yl) ethane Ligand Containing 2D Grids

合成了两个新的配合物CuLCl₂•2EtOH(1) 和CoLCl₂ (2) [L是( S , S )－1,2－二N－甲基苯并咪唑－1,2－二甲氧基－乙烷],并通过单晶X衍射确定它们的结构。配合物1中,L作为三齿[N, N, O]配体,而配合物2 中,L作为二齿[N, N]配体。这两个配合物共同的结构特点都是通过分子内氢键形成2维的格子结构,然后通过分子间的C－H···Cl型氢键和π–π堆积作用形成3维结构。     

The effect of counter‐ions on the supra­molecular arrangement of (benzonitrile)[1,2‐bis(diphenylphosphino)ethane](η5‐cyclo­penta­dienyl)­iron(II) cations

The title compound, [1,2‐bis(diphenylphosphino)ethane](η⁵‐cyclo­penta­dienyl)(4‐nitro­benzonitrile)iron(II) iodide, [Fe(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(C₇H₄N₂O₂)(C₂₆H₄P₂)]I, crystallizes in the non‐centrosymmetric space group Cc, which is a promising result for obtaining quadratic non‐linear optical properties. However, the packing shows that the iodide counter‐ion promotes the cancellation of almost all the dipoles, resulting in a supra­molecular motif of cationic chains aligned in opposite directions making an angle of 35.2°. The use of PF₆⁻ as counter‐ion induces the crystallization of the complex in a centrosymmetric space group. These results show that the introduction of different counter‐ions, of different size and geometry, allows specific and directional inter­molecular inter­actions that can determine the formation of a particular type of crystal packing.     

Synthesis of regioregular poly(3‐octylthiophene)s via Suzuki polycondensation and end‐group analysis by matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionization time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry

Regioregular poly(3‐octylthiophene)s were synthesized through a palladium‐catalyzed Suzuki polycondensation of 2‐(5‐iodo‐4‐octyl‐2‐thienyl)‐4,4,5,5‐tetramethyl‐1,3,2‐dioxaborolane. The effects of the palladium catalyst {tetrakis(triphenylphosphine)palladium(0) [Pd(PPh₃)₄], palladium(II) acetate [Pd(OAc)₂], [1, 1′‐bis(diphenylphosphino)ferrocene]dichloropalladium(II) [Pd(dppf)Cl₂], tris(dibenzylideneacetone)dipalladium(0), or bis(triphenylphosphine)palladium(II) dichloride [Pd(PPh₃)₂Cl₂]} and the reaction conditions (bases and solvents) were investigated. NMR spectroscopy revealed that poly(3‐octylthiophene)s prepared via this route were essentially regioregular. According to size exclusion chromatography, the highest molecular weights were obtained with in situ generated Pd(PPh₃)₄ and tetrakis(tri‐o‐tolylphosphine]palladium(0) {Pd[P(o‐Tol)₃]₄} catalysts or more reactive, phosphine‐free Pd(OAc)₂. Matrix‐assisted laser desorption/ionization time‐of‐flight mass spectrometry was used to analyze end groups and allowed the determination of some mechanistic aspects of the Suzuki polycondensation. The polymers were commonly terminated with hydrogen or iodine as a result of deboronation and some deiodination. Pd(PPh₃)₄, Pd(PPh₃)₂Cl₂, and Pd[P(o‐Tol)₃]₄ induced aryl–aryl exchange reactions with the palladium center and resulted in some chains having phenyl‐ and o‐tolyl‐capped chain ends. Pd(dppf)Cl₂ yielded only one type of chain, and it had hydrogen end groups. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part A: Polym Chem 43: 1454–1462, 2005     

Platinum and Palladium Complexes Bearing New (1R,2R)‐(–)‐1,2‐Diaminocyclohexane (DACH)‐Based Nitrogen Ligands: Evaluation of the Complexes Against L1210 Leukemia

The reaction of (1R,2R)‐(–)‐1,2‐diaminocyclohexane ( 1 ) [DACH] with the aldehyde (1R)‐(–)‐myrtenal ( 2 ) in MeOH afforded the bidentate diimine ligand, (1R,2R)‐(–)‐N¹,N²‐bis{(1R)‐(–)myrtenylidene}‐1,2‐diaminocyclohexane ( 3 ) in a high yield. Reduction of 3 using LiAlH₄ led to the formation of the desired ligand ( 4 ) (1R,2R)‐(–)‐N¹,N²‐bis{(1R)‐(–)myrtenyl}‐1,2‐diaminocyclohexane. Treatment of compound 4 with K₂PtCl₄ or K₂PdCl₄ yielded the corresponding platinum(II) and palladium(II) complexes, Pt‐5 and Pd‐6 , respectively. The reaction of compound 3 with K₂PtCl₄ gave the diimine complex Pt‐7 . The cytotoxic activity of the complexes Pt‐5 , Pd‐6 and Pt‐7 was tested and compared to the approved drugs, cisplatin ( Cis ‐Pt ) and oxaliplatin ( Ox‐Pt ). The complexes ( Pt‐5 , Pd‐6 and Pt‐7 ) inhibit L1210 cell line proliferation with an IC₅₀ of 0.6, 4.2, and 0.7 μL, respectively as evidenced by measuring thymidine incorporation.     

Synthese,Struktur und Charakterisierung von Titan‐, Zink‐, Nickel‐ und Palladium‐Thioether‐Thiolat‐Komplexen heterocyclischer 1,2‐Dithiolate

Synthesis, Structures, and Characterization of Titanium, Zinc, Nickel, and Palladium Thioether Thiolate Complexes of Heterocyclic 1,2‐Dithiolates Synthesis and properties of mixed ligand complexes of thioether thiolate ligands 4‐methylthio‐1,3‐dithiole‐2‐one‐5‐thiolate (dmidCH₃), 4‐methylthio‐1,3‐dithiole‐2‐thione‐5‐thiolate (dmitCH₃), and 4‐methylthio‐1,3‐dithiole‐2‐selone‐5‐thiolate (dmiseCH₃) are described. The x‐ray structures of CpTi(dmidCH₃)₂ (Cp′ = methylcyclopentadienyl), of two polymorphic structures of (tmeda)Zn(dmitCH₃)₂ [tmeda = 1,2‐bis(dimethylamino)ethane], of (dppe)Ni(dmitCH₃)₂, and (dppe)Pd(dmitCH₃)₂ [dppe=1,2‐bis(diphenylphosphino)ethane] are reported.     

Synthesis and Characterization of Dinuclear Ruthenium(II) Complexes Based on 4,4′‐Bipyridyl Type Bridging Ligands

The synthesis, spectroscopic, electrochemical and photophysical characterization of a series of dinuclear ruthenium(II) complexes of the type [(bpy)₂Ru(NnN)₂RuCl(bpy)₂](PF₆)₃, where NnN = 4,4′‐bipyridyl (N0N), 1,2‐bis(4‐pyridyl)ethylene (NEN), 1,2‐bis(4‐pyridyl)ethane (N2N), and 4,4′‐trimethylenedipyridine (N3N) are reported. The photophysical and electrochemical properties are discussed with particular emphasis on the ability of the bridging ligands to support intercomponent interaction.     

Stereoselectivity in Diphos Addition to Molybdenum Complex with Pyridine‐2‐thionate (pyS) and η3‐Methallyl Coordinated Ligands

The conformational isomers endo‐ and exo‐[Mo{η³‐C₃H₄(CH₃)}(η²‐pyS)(CO)(η²‐diphos)] (diphos: dppm = {bis(diphenylphosphino)methane}, 2 ; dppe = {1,2‐bis(diphenylphosphino)ethane}, 3 ) are prepared by reacting the double‐bridged pyridine‐2‐thionate (pyS) complex [Mo{η³‐C₃H₄(CH₃)}(CO)₂]₂(η¹:η²:μ‐pyS)₂, 1 with diphos in refluxing acetonitrile. Stereoselectivity of the methallyl, C₃H₄(CH₃), ligand improves the formation of the exo‐conformation of 2 and 3 . Orientations and spectroscopy of these complexes are discussed.