A minimal classical sequent calculus free of structural rules

Gentzen’s classical sequent calculus has explicit structural rules for contraction and weakening. They can be absorbed (in a right-sided formulation) by replacing the axiom P,¬P by Γ,P,¬P for any context Γ, and replacing the original disjunction rule with Γ,A,B implies Γ,A∨B.This paper presents a classical sequent calculus which is also free of contraction and weakening, but more symmetrically: both contraction and weakening are absorbed into conjunction, leaving the axiom rule intact. It uses a blended conjunction rule, combining the standard context-sharing and context-splitting rules: Γ,Δ,A and Γ,Σ,B implies Γ,Δ,Σ,A∧B. We refer to this system as minimal sequent calculus.We prove a minimality theorem for the propositional fragment : any propositional sequent calculus S (within a standard class of right-sided calculi) is complete if and only ifS contains (that is, each rule of is derivable in S). Thus one can view as a minimal complete core of Gentzen’s .     

Kripke models for classical logic

We introduce a notion of the Kripke model for classical logic for which we constructively prove the soundness and cut-free completeness. We discuss the novelty of the notion and its potential applications.     

Labeled sequent calculus for justification logics

Justification logics are modal-like logics that provide a framework for reasoning about justifications. This paper introduces labeled sequent calculi for justification logics, as well as for combined modal-justification logics. Using a method due to Sara Negri, we internalize the Kripke-style semantics of justification and modal-justification logics, known as Fitting models, within the syntax of the sequent calculus to produce labeled sequent calculi. We show that all rules of these systems are invertible and the structural rules (weakening and contraction) and the cut rule are admissible. Soundness and completeness are established as well. The analyticity for some of our labeled sequent calculi are shown by proving that they enjoy the subformula, sublabel and subterm properties. We also present an analytic labeled sequent calculus for $\mathsf{S4LPN}$ based on Artemov–Fitting models.     

Weak effect algebras

Weak effect algebras are based on a commutative, associative and cancellative partial addition; they are moreover endowed with a partial order which is compatible with the addition, but in general not determined by it. Every BL-algebra, i.e. the Lindenbaum algebra of a theory of Basic Logic, gives rise to a weak effect algebra; to this end, the monoidal operation is restricted to a partial cancellative operation. We examine in this paper BL-effect algebras, a subclass of the weak effect algebras which properly contains all weak effect algebras arising from BL-algebras. We describe the structure of BL-effect algebras in detail. We thus generalise the well-known structure theory of BL-algebras. Namely, we show that BL-effect algebras are subdirect products of linearly ordered ones and that linearly ordered BL-effect algebras are ordinal sums of generalised effect algebras. The latter are representable by means of linearly ordered groups. This research was partially supported by the German Science Foundation (DFG) as part of the Collaborative Research Center “Computational Intelligence” (SFB 531).     

Proof internalization in generalized Frege systems for classical logic

We present a general method for inserting proofs in Frege systems for classical logic that produces systems that can internalize their own proofs.     

The coextension of commutative pomonoids and its application to triangular norms

Group coextensions of monoids, which generalise Schreier-type extensions of groups, have originally been defined by P.A. Grillet and J. Leech. The present paper deals with pomonoids, that is, monoids that are endowed with a compatible partial order. Following the lines of the unordered case, we define pogroup coextensions of pomonoids. We furthermore generalise the construction to the case that pomonoids instead of pogroups are used as the extending structures.

The intended application lies in fuzzy logic, where triangular norms are those binary operations that are commonly used to interpret the conjunction. We present conditions under which the coextension of a finite totally ordered monoid leads to a triangular norm. Triangular norms of a certain type can therefore be classified on the basis of the presented results.     

Generalized ordinal sums and the decidability of BL-chains

We present a general construction of a family of ordinal sums of a sequence of structures and prove an elimination theorem for the class of ordinal sums in an expanded language. From this we deduce the decidability of the class of -ordinal sums of models of a decidable theory T. As an application of this result we prove that the theory of BL-chains is decidable.In Celebration of the Sixtieth Birthday of Ralph N. McKenzieReceived June 9, 2002; accepted in final form June 19, 2003.     

Injectives in residuated algebras

Injectives in several classes of structures associated with logic are characterized. Among the classes considered are residuated lattices, MTL-algebras, IMTL-algebras, BL-algebras, NM-algebras and bounded hoops.     

Uniform interpolation and the existence of sequent calculi

This paper presents a uniform and modular method to prove uniform interpolation for several intermediate and intuitionistic modal logics. The proof-theoretic method uses sequent calculi that are extensions of the terminating sequent calculus $\mathsf{G4ip}$ for intuitionistic propositional logic. It is shown that whenever the rules in a calculus satisfy certain structural properties, the corresponding logic has uniform interpolation. It follows that the intuitionistic versions of $\mathsf{K}$ and $\mathsf{KD}$ (without the diamond operator) have uniform interpolation. It also follows that no intermediate or intuitionistic modal logic without uniform interpolation has a sequent calculus satisfying those structural properties, thereby establishing that except for the seven intermediate logics that have uniform interpolation, no intermediate logic has such a sequent calculus.     

Two applications of Boolean models

Semantical arguments, based on the completeness theorem for first-order logic, give elegant proofs of purely syntactical results. For instance, for proving a conservativity theorem between two theories, one shows instead that any model of one theory can be extended to a model of the other theory. This method of proof, because of its use of the completeness theorem, is a priori not valid constructively. We show here how to give similar arguments, valid constructively, by using Boolean models. These models are a slight variation of ordinary first-order models, where truth values are now regular ideals of a given Boolean algebra. Two examples are presented: a simple conservativity result and Herbrand's theorem. Received December 5, 1995     

Applications of the classical umbral calculus

We describe applications of the classical umbral calculus to bilinear generating functions for polynomial sequences, identities for Bernoulli and related numbers, and Kummer congruences.Dedicated to the Memory of Gian-Carlo Rota     

Categories of models of R-mingle

We give a new Esakia-style duality for the category of Sugihara monoids based on the Davey-Werner natural duality for lattices with involution, and use this duality to greatly simplify a construction due to Galatos-Raftery of Sugihara monoids from certain enrichments of their negative cones. Our method of obtaining this simplification is to transport the functors of the Galatos-Raftery construction across our duality, obtaining a vastly more transparent presentation on duals. Because our duality extends Dunn's relational semantics for the logic R-mingle to a categorical equivalence, this also explains the Dunn semantics and its relationship with the more usual Routley-Meyer semantics for relevant logics.     

Epsilon substitution for transfinite induction

We apply Mints technique for proving the termination of the epsilon substitution method via cut-elimination to the system of Peano Arithmetic with Transfinite Induction given by Arai.     

The bounded proof property via step algebras and step frames

The paper introduces semantic and algorithmic methods for establishing a variant of the analytic subformula property (called ‘the bounded proof property’, bpp) for modal propositional logics. The bpp is much weaker property than full cut-elimination, but it is nevertheless sufficient for establishing decidability results. Our methodology originated from tools and techniques developed on one side within the algebraic/coalgebraic literature dealing with free algebra constructions and on the other side from classical correspondence theory in modal logic. As such, our approach is orthogonal to recent literature based on proof-theoretic methods and, in a way, complements it.     

Proof-theoretic conservations of weak weak intuitionistic constructive set theories

The paper aims to provide precise proof theoretic characterizations of Myhill–Friedman-style “weak” constructive extensional set theories and Aczel–Rathjen analogous constructive set theories both enriched by Mostowski-style collapsing axioms and/or related anti-foundation axioms. The main results include full intuitionistic conservations over the corresponding purely arithmetical formalisms that are well known in the reverse mathematics – which strengthens analogous results obtained by the author in the 80s. The present research was inspired by the more recent Sato-style “weak weak” classical extensional set theories whose proof theoretic strengths are shown to strongly exceed the ones of the intuitionistic counterparts in the presence of the collapsing axioms.     

Proof and refutation in MALL as a game

We present a setting in which the search for a proof of B or a refutation of B (i.e., a proof of ¬B) can be carried out simultaneously: in contrast, the usual approach in automated deduction views proving B or proving ¬B as two, possibly unrelated, activities. Our approach to proof and refutation is described as a two-player game in which each player follows the same rules. A winning strategy translates to a proof of the formula and a counter-winning strategy translates to a refutation of the formula. The game is described for multiplicative and additive linear logic (MALL). A game theoretic treatment of the multiplicative connectives is intricate and our approach to it involves two important ingredients. First, labeled graph structures are used to represent positions in a game and, second, the game playing must deal with the failure of a given player and with an appropriate resumption of play. This latter ingredient accounts for the fact that neither player might win (that is, neither B nor ¬B might be provable).     

Unprovability threshold for the planar graph minor theorem

This note is part of the implementation of a programme in foundations of mathematics to find exact threshold versions of all mathematical unprovability results known so far, a programme initiated by Weiermann. Here we find the exact versions of unprovability of the finite graph minor theorem with growth rate condition restricted to planar graphs, connected planar graphs and graphs embeddable into a given surface, assuming an unproved conjecture (*): ‘there is a number a>0 such that for all k≥3, and all n≥1, the proportion of connected graphs among unlabelled planar graphs of size n omitting the k-element circle as minor is greater than a’. Let γ be the unlabelled planar growth constant (27.2269≤γ<30.061). Let P(c) be the following first-order arithmetical statement with real parameter c: “for every K there is N such that whenever G₁,G₂,…,G_N are unlabelled planar graphs with |G_i|<K+c⋅log₂i then for some i<j≤N, G_i is isomorphic to a minor of G_j”. Then

1.

for every , P(c) is provable in IΔ₀+exp;

2.

for every , P(c) is unprovable in .

We also give proofs of some upper and lower bounds for unprovability thresholds in the general case of the finite graph minor theorem.