Synthesis and characterization of (3,1) Ru2(F3ap)4(NCS) and (3,1) Ru2(F3ap)3(F2Oap)(NCS) where F3ap is the 2-(2,4,6-trifluoroanilino)pyridinate anion

Two isothiocyanate diruthenium complexes, (3,1) Ru2(F3ap)4(NCS) 1 and (3,1) Ru2(F3ap)3(F2Oap)(NCS)2 (where F3ap=2,4,6-trifluoroanilinopyridinate anion), were synthesized from (3,1) Ru2(F3ap)4Cl and SCN(-) under different experimental conditions. Each compound was examined as to its structural, electrochemical, spectroscopic, and magnetic properties. Compound 1 contains three unpaired electrons as its parent compound but 2 is diamagnetic. The X-ray molecular structures of 1 and 2 reveal that the NCS group is coordinated to the dimetal unit via nitrogen in both compounds with the Ru-N-C bond angle being 176.5 degrees for 1 and 166.0 degrees for 2. An elongation of the Ru-Ru bond distance and a shortening of both the Ru-Np (p=pyridyl) and the Ru-Na (a=anilino) bond lengths is seen upon going from (3,1) Ru2(F3ap)4Cl to 2, but the conversion of (3,1) Ru2(F3ap)4Cl to 1 does not affect significantly structural features of the Ru2(L) 4 framework. Compound 1 undergoes one reduction and two oxidations, all three of which involve the dimetal core, whereas 2 undergoes two metal-centered reductions, one metal-centered oxidation, and one ligand-based oxidation due to the presence of the F2Oap ligand on the Ru2 complex. The reactivity of 1 with SCN(-) was also investigated.     

Factors affecting the electrochemical and spectroelectrochemical properties of diruthenium(III,II) complexes containing four identical unsymmetrical bridging ligands

Factors affecting the electrochemical and spectroelectrochemical properties of diruthenium(III,II) complexes containing four unsymmetrical bridging ligands are reported for seven related compounds which were isolated in one or two of the four possible isomeric forms. The investigated compounds are represented as Ru(2)(2-CH(3)ap)(4)Cl, Ru(2)(2,5-F(2)ap)(4)Cl, Ru(2)(2,6-F(2)ap)(4)Cl, and Ru(2)(2,4,6-F(3)ap)(4)Cl where 2-CH(3)ap, 2,5-F(2)ap, 2,6-F(2)ap, and 2,4,6-F(3)ap are, respectively, the 2-(2-methylanilino)pyridinate anion, the 2-(2,5-difluoroanilino)pyridinate anion, the 2-(2,6-difluoroanilino)pyridinate anion, and the 2-(2,4,6-trifluoroanilino)pyridinate anion. Ru(2)(2-CH(3)ap)(4)Cl and Ru(2)(2,5-F(2)ap)(4)Cl exist only in a (4,0) conformation while Ru(2)(2,4,6-F(3)ap)(4)Cl is present in both (3,1) and (4,0) isomeric forms. Ru(2)(2,6-F(2)ap)(4)Cl also exists in two isomeric forms, but only the (3,1) isomer was generated in sufficient quantities to be isolated and structurally characterized. This series of seven closely related metal-metal bonded complexes thus provides the first possibility to systematically examine how differences in position and number of the electron-donating or electron-withdrawing groups on the anionic bridging ligands might be related to the electronic properties and structural features of the compound as well as the type and number of geometric isomers which are formed. Each diruthenium derivative undergoes three one-electron transfers in CH(2)Cl(2) containing 0.1 M tetra-n-butylammonium perchlorate (TBAP). The first reduction and first oxidation products were characterized by thin-layer UV-vis spectroelectrochemistry, and the spectroscopic data, along with E(1/2) values, were then related via linear free energy relationships to the type of isomer and/or position of the electron-donating or electron-withdrawing substituents on the anionic ap bridge. The electrogenerated Ru(2)(6+) and Ru(2)(4+) forms of the compounds were assigned on the basis of electrochemical and UV-vis spectroscopic data as having the electronic configuration sigma(2)pi(4)delta(2)pi(2) and sigma(2)pi(4)delta(2)pi(3)delta, respectively, and seemed to be independent of the isomer type ((3,1) or (4,0)). The spectral and electrochemical properties of the compounds both vary substantially as a function of the isomer type, but this is not reflected in the structural features of the compounds which are within the range of what is seen for other Ru(2)(5+) species described in the literature. The Ru-Ru bond lengths of the four structurally characterized (4,0) isomers of the ap complexes range from 2.275 to 2.296 A while those of the three structurally characterized (3,1) isomers of ap derivatives fall in the range 2.284-2.286 A and show no significant difference among the three compounds. The Ru-Cl bond lengths of the (3,1) isomers do not vary significantly with the bridging ligand and range from 2.458 to 2.471 A whereas those of the (4,0) isomers range from 2.437 to 2.487 A and show larger variations among the compounds. The Ru-Ru-Cl bond angle is virtually independent of the bridging ligand in the case of the (4,0) isomers but decreases with the electron-withdrawing effect of the substituent in the case of the (3,1) isomers.     

Syntheses, structural determination, and electrochemistry of Ru(2)(Fap)(4)Cl and Ru(2)(Fap)(4)(NO)Cl

Ru(2)(Fap)(4)Cl and Ru(2)(Fap)(4)(NO)Cl, where Fap is the 2-(2-fluoroanilino)pyridinate anion, were synthesized, and their structural, electrochemical, and spectroscopic properties were characterized. Ru(2)(Fap)(4)Cl, which was obtained by reaction between Ru(2)(O(2)CCH(3))(4)Cl and molten HFap, crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P2(1)/c, with a = 11.2365(4) A, b = 19.9298(8) A, c = 19.0368(7) A, beta = 90.905(1) degrees, and Z = 4. The presence of three unpaired electrons on the Ru(2)(5+) core and the 2.2862(3) A Ru-Ru bond length for Ru(2)(Fap)(4)Cl are consistent with the electronic configuration (sigma)(2)(pi)(4)(delta)(2)(pi*)(2)(delta*)(1). The reaction between Ru(2)(Fap)(4)Cl and NO gas yields Ru(2)(Fap)(4)(NO)Cl, which crystallizes in the orthorhombic space group Pbca, with a = 10.0468(6) A, b = 18.8091(10) A, c = 41.7615(23) A, and Z = 8. The Ru-Ru bond length of Ru(2)(Fap)(4)(NO)Cl is 2.4203(8) A, while its N-O bond length and Ru-N-O bond angle are 1.164(8) A and 155.8(6) degrees, respectively. Ru(2)(Fap)(4)(NO)Cl can be formulated as a formal Ru(2)(II,II)(NO(+)) complex with a linear Ru-N-O group, and the proposed electronic configuration for this compound is (sigma)(2)(pi)(4)(delta)(2)(pi*)(3)(delta*)(1). The binding of NO to Ru(2)(Fap)(4)Cl leads to some structural changes of the Ru(2)(Fap)(4) framework and a stabilization of the lower oxidation states of the diruthenium unit. Also, IR spectroelectrochemical studies of Ru(2)(Fap)(4)(NO)Cl show that NO remains bound to the complex upon reduction and that the first reduction involves the addition of an electron on the diruthenium core and not on the NO axial ligand.     

Cyanide adducts on the diruthenium core of [Ru2(L)4](+) (L = ap, CH3ap, Fap, or F3ap). Electronic properties and binding modes of the bridging ligand

The products of the reaction between CN(-) and four different diruthenium complexes of the type Ru(2)(L)(4)Cl where L = 2-CH(3)ap (2-(2-methylanilino)pyridinate anion), ap (2-anilinopyridinate anion), 2-Fap (2-(2-fluoroanilino)pyridinate anion), or 2,4,6-F(3)ap (2-(2,4,6-trifluoroanilino)pyridinate anion) are reported. Mono- and/or dicyano adducts of the type Ru(2)(L)(4)(CN) and Ru(2)(L)(4)(CN)(2) are found exclusively as reaction products when either the 2-CH(3)ap or the ap derivative is reacted with CN(-), but diruthenium complexes with formulations of the type Ru(2)(F(x)ap)(3)[mu-(o-NC)F(x-1)ap](mu-CN) or Ru(2)(F(x)ap)(4)(mu-CN)(2) (x = 1 or 3) are also generated when Ru(2)(Fap)(4)Cl or Ru(2)(F(3)ap)(4)Cl is reacted with CN(-). More specifically, four products formulated as Ru(2)(Fap)(4)(CN), Ru(2)(Fap)(4)(CN)(2), Ru(2)(Fap)(3)[mu-(o-NC)ap](mu-CN), and Ru(2)(Fap)(4)(mu-CN)(2) can be isolated from a reaction of CN(-) with the Fap derivative, but the exact type and yield of these compounds depend on the temperature at which the experiment is carried out. In the case of the F(3)ap derivative, the only diruthenium complex isolated from the reaction mixture has the formulation Ru(2)(F(3)ap)(3)[mu-(o-NC)F(2)ap](mu-CN) and this compound has structural, electrochemical, and spectroscopic properties quite similar to that of previously characterized Ru(2)(F(5)ap)[mu-(o-NC)F(4)ap](mu-CN). Both the mono- and dicyano derivatives synthesized in this study possess the isomer type of their parent chloro complexes. The Ru-Ru bond lengths of Ru(2)(ap)(4)(CN) and Ru(2)(2-CH(3)ap)(4)(CN) are longer than those of Ru(2)(ap)(4)Cl and Ru(2)(CH(3)ap)(4)Cl, respectively, and this is accounted for by the strong sigma-donor properties of the CN(-) ligand as compared to Cl(-). The Ru-C bonds in Ru(2)(ap)(4)(CN)(2) are significantly shorter than those in Ru(2)(ap)(4)(CN), thus revealing a greatly enhanced Ru-CN interaction in the dicyano adduct, a result which is also indicated by the fact that nu(CN) in Ru(2)(ap)(4)(CN)(2) is 50 cm(-1) higher than nu(CN) in Ru(2)(ap)(4)(CN). Although both (4,0) Ru(2)(ap)(4)(CN)(2) and (3,1) Ru(2)(Fap)(4)(CN)(2) possess the same formulation, there are clear structural differences between the two complexes and this can be explained by the fact that the two cyano derivatives possess a different binding symmetry of the bridging ligands. Each mono- and dicyano adduct was electrochemically investigated in CH(2)Cl(2) containing TBAP as supporting electrolyte. Ru(2)(ap)(4)(CN), Ru(2)(CH(3)ap)(4)(CN), and Ru(2)(Fap)(4)(CN) undergo one reduction and two oxidations. The two dicyano adducts of the ap and Fap derivatives are characterized by two reductions and one oxidation. The potentials of these processes are all negatively shifted in potential by 400-720 mV with respect to half-wave potentials for the same redox couples of the monocyano derivatives, with the exact value depending upon the specific redox reaction.     

Paramagnetism at ambient temperature, diamagnetism at low temperature in a Ru2(6+) core: structural evidence for zero-field splitting

Variable temperature magnetic studies of the Ru(2)(6+) guanidinate compounds Ru(2)(hpp)(4)Cl(2) (1) and Ru(2)(hpp)(4)(CF(3)SO(3))(2) (2) show that they are paramagnetic with two unpaired electrons at room temperature and that they appear essentially diamagnetic at 2 K. In neither compound do the Ru-Ru distances vary by more than 0.008(1) A from 27 to 296 K. This argues strongly that the ground state electronic configuration remains constant over this temperature range and that the decrease in magnetism as the temperature is lowered must be attributable to zero-field splitting of the (3)A(2g) ground state arising from the electronic configuration sigma(2)pi(4)delta(2)pi(2). The Ru-Ru distance in 1 is about 0.04-0.05 A longer than that in 2 which indicates that the Ru(2)(hpp)(4)(2+) core is quite sensitive to the nature of the axial ligands. The electronic spectra show three absorption bands for each compound.     

Synthesis, characterization, and electrochemistry of diruthenium(III,II) and monoruthenium(III) complexes containing pyridyl-substituted 2-anilinopyridinate ligands

Reaction of the metal-metal bonded complex Ru(2)(O2CCH3)4Cl with 2-anilino-4-methylpyridine leads to the (3,1) isomer of the diruthenium(III,II) complex Ru2(ap-4-Me)4Cl, 1 while the same reaction with 2-anilino-6-methylpyridine gives the monoruthenium(III) derivative Ru(ap-6-Me)3, 2. Both compounds were examined as to their structural, electrochemical, and UV-visible properties, and the data were then compared to that previously reported for (4,0) Ru2(2-Meap)4Cl and other (3,1) isomers of Ru2(L)4Cl with similar anionic bridging ligands. ESR spectroscopy indicates that the monoruthenium derivative 2 contains low-spin Ru(III), and the presence of a single ruthenium atom is confirmed by an X-ray structure of the compound. The combined electrochemical and UV-vis spectroelectrochemical data indicate that the diruthenium complex 1 is easily converted to its Ru2(4+) and Ru2(6+) forms upon reduction or oxidation by one electron while the monoruthenium derivative 2 also undergoes metal-centered redox processes to give Ru(II) and Ru(IV) complexes under the same solution conditions. The reactivity of 1 with CO and CN- was also examined.     

Electrochemical and spectroscopic characterization of a series of mixed-ligand diruthenium compounds

The electrochemistry and spectroelectrochemistry of a novel series of mixed-ligand diruthenium compounds were examined. The investigated compounds having the formula Ru(2)(CH(3)CO(2))(x)(Fap)(4-x)Cl where x = 1-3 and Fap is 2-(2-fluoroanilino)pyridinate anion were made from the reaction of Ru(2)(CH(3)CO(2))(4)Cl with 2-(2-fluoroanilino)pyridine (HFap) in refluxing methanol. The previously characterized Ru(2)(Fap)(4)Cl as well as the three newly isolated compounds represented as Ru(2)(CH(3)CO(2))(Fap)(3)Cl (1), Ru(2)(CH(3)CO(2))(2)(Fap)(2)Cl (2), and Ru(2)(CH(3)CO(2))(3)(Fap)Cl (3) possess three unpaired electrons with a Ru(2)(5+) dimetal core. Complexes 1 and 2 have well-defined Ru(2)(5+/4+) and Ru(2)(5+/6+) redox couples in CH(2)Cl(2), but 3 exhibits a more complicated electrochemical behavior due to equilibria involving association or dissociation of the anionic chloride axial ligand on the initial and oxidized or reduced forms of the compound. The E(1/2) values for the Ru(2)(5+/4+) and Ru(2)(5+/6+) processes vary linearly with the number of CH(3)CO(2)(-) bridging ligands on Ru(2)(CH(3)CO(2))(x)(Fap)(4-x)Cl and plots of reversible half-wave potentials vs the number of acetate groups follow linear free energy relationships with the largest substituent effect being observed for the oxidation. The major UV-visible band of the examined compounds in their neutral Ru(2)(5+) form is located between 550 and 800 nm in CH(2)Cl(2) and also varies linearly with the number of CH(3)CO(2)(-) ligands on Ru(2)(CH(3)CO(2))(x)(Fap)(4-x)Cl. The electronic spectra of the singly oxidized and singly reduced forms of each diruthenium species were characterized by UV-visible spectroelectrochemistry in CH(2)Cl(2).     

High yield syntheses of stable, singly bonded Pd2(6+) compounds

A general method for the syntheses of dipalladium compounds having a singly bonded Pd26+ core and the formula R,S-cis-Pd2(C6H4PPh2)2(O2CR)2Cl2 is described. When the alkyl group in the carboxylate ligands is an electron donating group, the compounds are stable and the yields high. The Pd-Pd distances for the diamagnetic compounds with R = CF3 and CMe3 are 2.5434(4) and 2.5241(9) A, respectively. Calculations at the DFT level suggest that the electronic configuration is sigma2pi4delta2delta*2pi*4. These represent rare examples of palladium(III) compounds.     

Metal-metal bonding in molecular actinide compounds: electronic structure of [M2X8](2-) (M = U, Np, Pu; X = Cl, Br, I) complexes and comparison with d-block analogues

Density functional and multiconfigurational (ab initio) calculations have been performed on [M(2)X(8)](2-) (X = Cl, Br, I) complexes of 4d (Mo, Tc, Ru), 5d (W, Re, Os), and 5f (U, Np, Pu) metals in order to investigate general trends, similarities and differences in the electronic structure and metal-metal bonding between f-block and d-block elements. Multiple metal-metal bonds consisting of a combination of sigma and pi interactions have been found in all species investigated, with delta-like interactions also occurring in the complexes of Tc, Re, Np, Ru, Os, and Pu. The molecular orbital analysis indicates that these metal-metal interactions possess predominantly d(z2) (sigma), d(xz) and d(yz) (pi), or d(xy) and d(x2-y2) (delta) character in the d-block species, and f(z3) (sigma), f(z2x) and f(z2y) (pi), or f(xyz) and f(z) (delta) character in the actinide systems. In the latter, all three (sigma, pi, delta) types of interaction exhibit bonding character, irrespective of whether the molecular symmetry is D(4h) or D(4d). By contrast, although the nature and properties of the sigma and pi bonds are largely similar for the D(4h) and D(4d) forms of the d-block complexes, the two most relevant metal-metal delta-like orbitals occur as a bonding and antibonding combination in D(4h) symmetry but as a nonbonding level in D(4d) symmetry. Multiconfigurational calculations have been performed on a subset of the actinide complexes, and show that a single electronic configuration plays a dominant role and corresponds to the lowest-energy configuration obtained using density functional theory.     

Electrochemical and spectroelectrochemical characterization of Ru(2)(4+) and Ru(2)(3+) complexes under a CO atmosphere

Eleven different Ru(2)(4+) and Ru(2)(3+) derivatives are characterized by thin-layer FTIR and UV-visible spectroelectrochemistry under a CO atmosphere. These compounds, which were in-situ electrogenerated from substituted anilinopyridine complexes with a Ru(2)(5+) core, are represented as Ru(2)(L)(4)Cl where L = 2-CH(3)ap, ap, 2-Fap, 2,3-F(2)ap, 2,4-F(2)ap, 2,5-F(2)ap, 3,4-F(2)ap, 3,5-F(2)ap, 2,4,6-F(3)ap, or F(5)ap. The Ru(2)(5+) complexes do not axially bind CO while mono- and bis-CO axial adducts are formed for the Ru(2)(4+) and Ru(2)(3+) derivatives, respectively. Six of the eleven investigated compounds exist in a (4,0) isomeric form while five adopt a (3,1) geometric conformation. These two series of compounds thus provide a large enough number of derivatives to examine trends and differences in the spectroscopic data of the two types of isomers in their lower Ru(2)(4+) and Ru(2)(3+) oxidation states. UV-visible spectra of the Ru(2)(4+) derivatives and IR spectra of the Ru(2)(3+) complexes under CO are both isomer dependent, thus suggesting that these data can be used to reliably predict the isomeric form, i.e., (3,1) or (4,0), of diruthenium complexes containing four unsymmetrical substituted anilinopyridinate bridging ligands; this was confirmed by X-ray crystallographic data for seven compounds whose structures were available.     

Completion of the series of M2(hpp)4Cl2 compounds from W to Pt: the W, Os, and Pt compounds

The series of M2(hpp)4Cl2 complexes (hpp is the anion of 1,3,4,6,7,8-hexahydro-2H-pyrimido[1,2-a]pyrimidine) from M = W to M = Pt has been completed by the preparation and characterization of those with M = W, Os, and Pt. W(hpp)4Cl2 (1) has a W-W distance of 2.250(2) A, is diamagnetic, and can be assigned a W-W triple bond based on a sigma 2 pi 4 electron configuration. Os2(hpp)4Cl2 (2) has an Os-Os distance of 2.379(2) A and displays a temperature-independent paramagnetism. It can be assigned a sigma 2 pi 4 delta 2 delta*2 configuration. Pt2(hpp)4Cl2 has a Pt-Pt distance of 2.440(1) A and is diamagnetic. A bond order of 1, based on a configuration in which only the sigma* orbital is empty, is consistent with these data.     

Paramagnetic precursors for supramolecular assemblies: selective syntheses, crystal structures, and electrochemical and magnetic properties of Ru2(O2CMe)4-n(formamidinate)nCl complexes, n = 1-4

Reactions of Ru(2)(O(2)CMe)(4)Cl with two formamidines, HDXyl(2,6)F = N,N'-di(2,6-xylyl)formamidine and HDAniF = N,N'-di(p-anisyl)formamidine, have been investigated with the idea of synthesizing compounds with a mixed set of ligands having different labilities to be used as precursors of paramagnetic, higher-order assemblies. Depending on the formamidine and the reaction conditions, several Ru(2)(5+) compounds of the type Ru(2)(O(2)CMe)(4)(-)(n)(DArF)(n)Cl (DArF = anion of an N,N'-diarylformamidine) have been isolated. With the bulky formamidine HXyl(2,6)F, the compounds Ru(2)(O(2)CMe)(3)(DXyl(2,6)F)Cl (1) and trans-Ru(2)(O(2)CMe)(2)(DXyl(2,6)F)(2)Cl (2) were obtained. From reactions with appropriate amounts of HDAniF in THF and in the presence of NEt(3) and LiCl, complexes of the general type Ru(2)(O(2)CMe)(4)(-)(n)(DArF)(n)Cl (n = 1-4) were selectively obtained. For n = 2, only the cis isomer was obtained. The choice of solvent in reactions of Ru(2)(O(2)CMe)(4)Cl and HDAniF is of great importance. Toluene favored the formation of the fully substituted Ru(2)(5+) complex Ru(2)(DAniF)(4)Cl (3), whereas MeOH resulted in a disproportionation reaction that gave the edge-sharing bioctahedral Ru(3+)Ru(3+) complex [trans-Ru(2)(mu-OMe)(2)(mu-O(2)CMe)(2)(HDAniF)(4)]Cl(2) (6) and the Ru(2)(4+) complex Ru(2)(DAniF)(4) (7). Complexes 6 and 7 with an Ru(2)(6+) and Ru(2)(4+) core, respectively, are diamagnetic, whereas all Ru(2)(5+) complexes are paramagnetic with sigma(2)pi(4)delta(2)(pi*delta*)(3) ground-state electronic configurations and large zero-field splitting contributions. All compounds show rich and complex electrochemical behavior.     

Diruthenium(II,III) tetramidates as a new class of oxygenation catalysts

Two new diruthenium(II,III) tetramidate compounds, Ru(2)(NHOCC(CH(3))(2))(4)Cl (1) and Ru(2)(NHOCCH(2)CH(3))(4)Cl (2) have been prepared and structurally characterized by X-ray crystallography. The activity of promoting sulfide oxygenation using simple oxidants such as hydrogen peroxide (H(2)O(2)) and tert-butyl hydroperoxide (TBHP) was studied. A UV-kinetics study indicated that the initial rates of 1 and 2 are comparable to the previously studied diruthenium tetracarboxylates in promoting TBHP oxygenation of methyl phenyl sulfide (MPS). Using excess oxidant and CH(3)CN as the solvent, organic sulfides MPS and diphenyl sulfide (PPS) were oxidized using 1 mol% of the catalytic species. Compound 1 is more effective than 2 in converting sulfides to sulfoxide under the same conditions. Fast conversion was achieved when the reactions were carried out in the solvent-free conditions, and the major oxidation product was the sulfoxide. The electronic structure of the title compounds was studied with DFT calculations to gain an understanding of the activation of peroxy reagents.     

Synthesis, structural, spectroscopic, and electrochemical characterization of high oxidation state diruthenium complexes containing four identical unsymmetrical bridging ligands

Six Ru2(6+) derivatives of the form Ru2(L)4(C[triple bond]CC6H5)(2), where L = 2-Fap, 2,3-F(2)ap, 2,4-F(2)ap, 2,5-F(2)ap, 3,4-F(2)ap, or 2,4,6-F(3)ap, are synthesized and characterized as to their electrochemical, spectroscopic, and/or structural properties. These compounds are synthesized from a reaction between LiC[triple bond]CC6H5 and Ru2(L)4Cl. Two of the investigated complexes exist in a (4,0) isomeric form while four adopt a (3,1) geometric conformation. These two series of geometric isomers are compared with previously characterized (4,0) Ru2(ap)4(C[triple bond]CC6H5)(2), (4,0) Ru2(F5ap)4(C[triple bond]CC6H5)(2), and (3,1) Ru2(F5ap)4(C[triple bond]CC6H5)(2). The overall data on the nine compounds thus provide an opportunity to systematically examine how the electrochemical and structural properties of these Ru2(6+) complexes vary with respect to isomer type and electronic properties of the bridging ligands.     

Resonance Raman, X-ray Crystallographic, and Magnetic Susceptibility Studies of Metal-Metal-Bonded MoRu and WOs Porphyrin Dimers. 1. Evidence for an Unusual MO Diagram

Solution (VT NMR, Evans method magnetic susceptibility, resonance Raman) and solid-state (SQUID magnetic susceptibility, X-ray crystallography) spectroscopic studies of intertriad heterodimeric [(OEP)MoRu(OEP)] (1), [(OEP)WOs(OEP)] (2), and [(OEP)MoRu(TPP)]PF(6) (3(+)) metalloporphyrins are reported (OEP = 2,3,7,8,12,13,17,18-octaethylporphyrinato; TPP = 5,10,15,20-tetraphenylporphyrinato). Solution and solid-state magnetic susceptibility data indicate that 1 and 2 contain two unpaired electrons in the ground electronic configuration. The presence of a delta bond in 3(+) has been confirmed by structural characterization. The experimental evidence is consistent with a molecular orbital ordering, sigma < pi < delta < pi < delta, which is different from that seen for homologous metalloporphyrin dimers with homometallic or intratriad heterometallic multiple metal-metal bonds. Resonance Raman data suggest that the heterometallic bonds are slightly stronger than isoelectronic homometallic species.     

3,6-bis(2'-pyridyl)pyridazine (L) and its deprotonated form (L - H+)- as ligands for {(acac)2Ru(n+)} or {(bpy)2Ru(m+)}: investigation of mixed valency in [{(acac)2Ru}2(mu-L - H+)]0 and [{(bpy)2Ru}2(mu-L - H+)]4+ by spectroelectrochemistry and EPR

Crystallographically characterised 3,6-bis(2'-pyridyl)pyridazine (L) forms complexes with {(acac)2Ru} or {(bpy)2Ru2+}via one pyridyl-N/pyridazyl-N chelate site in mononuclear Ru(II) complexes (acac)2Ru(L), 1, and [(bpy)2Ru(L)](ClO4)2, [3](ClO4)2. Coordination of a second metal complex fragment is accompanied by deprotonation at the pyridazyl-C5 carbon {L --> (L - H+)-} to yield cyclometallated, asymmetrically bridged dinuclear complexes [(acac)2Ru(III)(mu-L - H+)Ru(III)(acac)2](ClO4), [2](ClO4), and [(bpy)2Ru(II)(mu-L - H+)Ru(II)(bpy)2](ClO4)3, [4](ClO4)3. The different electronic characteristics of the co-ligands, sigma donating acac- and pi accepting bpy, cause a wide variation in metal redox potentials which facilitates the isolation of the diruthenium(III) form in [2](ClO4) with antiferromagnetically coupled Ru(III) centres (J = -11.5 cm(-1)) and of a luminescent diruthenium(II) species in [4](ClO4)3. The electrogenerated mixed-valent Ru(II)Ru(III) states 2 and [4]4+ with comproportionation constants Kc > 10(8) are assumed to be localised with the Ru(III) ion bonded via the negatively charged pyridyl-N/pyridazyl-C5 chelate site of the bridging (L - H+)- ligand. In spectroelectrochemical experiments they show similar intervalence charge transfer bands of moderate intensity around 1300 nm and comparable g anisotropies (g1-g3 approximatly 0.5) in the EPR spectra. However, the individual g tensor components are distinctly higher for the pi acceptor ligated system [4]4+, signifying stabilised metal d orbitals.     

Oxalate-bridged dinuclear M2 units: dimers of dimers, cyclotetramers, and extended sheets (m = Mo, W, Tc, Ru, and Rh)

The electronic structures of D(4h)-M(2)(O(2)CH)(4) and the oxalate-bridged complexes D(2h)-[(HCO(2))(3)M(2)](2)(mu-O(2)CCO(2)) and D(4h)-[(HCO(2))(2)M(2)](4)(mu-O(2)CCO(2))(4) have been investigated by a symmetry analysis of their MM and oxalate-based frontier orbitals, as well as by electronic structure calculations on the model formate complexes (M = Mo and W {d(4)-d(4)}, Tc, Ru {d(6)-d(6)}, and Rh {d(7)-d(7)}). Significant changes in the ordering, interactions, and electronic occupation of the molecular orbitals (MOs) arise through both the progression from d(4) to d(7) metals and the change from second to third row transition metals. For M = Mo and W, the highest-occupied orbitals are delta based, while the lowest-unoccupied orbitals are oxalate pi based; for M = Tc, the highest-occupied orbitals are an energetically tight delta-based set of MOs, while the lowest-unoccupied orbitals are MM-based pi. For both Ru and Rh, the highest-occupied MOs are the MM pi* and delta*, respectively, while the lowest-unoccupied MOs, in both instances, are MM-based sigma. With the exception of M = Ru, all of the complexes are closed shell. From the progression M(2) --> [M(2)](2) --> [M(2)](4), we can envision the nature of bandlike structures for a 2-dimensional square grid of formula [M(2)(mu-O(2)CCO(2))](infinity). Only for Mo and W oxalates should good electronic communication between MM centers generate a band of significant width to lead to metallic conductivity upon oxidation.     

Synthesis, electrochemistry, and spectroscopic characterization of bis-dirhodium complexes linked by axial ligands

The synthesis and electrochemical and spectroscopic properties of bis-dirhodium complexes containing ap or dpf bridging ligands, (ap)(4)Rh(2)(C triple bond C)(2)Rh(2)(ap)(4) (2) and (dpf)(4)Rh(2)(CNC(6)H(4)NC)Rh(2)(dpf)(4) (4), were investigated (where ap and dpf are the 2-anilinopyridinate and N,N'-diphenylformamidinate ions, respectively). The related "simple" dirhodium species, (ap)(4)Rh(2)(C triple bond C)(2)Si(CH(3))(3) (1) and (dpf)(4)Rh(2)(CNC(6)H(5)) (3), with the same set of bridging ligands were also synthesized and their properties compared to those of the analogous bis-dirhodium complexes. Compound 1 was obtained by mixing (ap)(4)Rh(2)Cl and Li(C triple bond C)(2)Si(CH(3))(3) in refluxing THF for 16 h under vacuum while compound 2 was prepared by a reaction between (ap)(4)Rh(2)(C triple bond C)(2)Li and (ap)(4)Rh(2)Cl under similar conditions. The reaction between (CF(3)COO)(4)Rh(2) and molten Hdpf under vacuum for 24 h leads to the generation of compound 3 with a yield of 65%. The red-orange compound 4 was obtained upon addition of 0.5 equiv of CNC(6)H(4)NC at room temperature to a CH(2)Cl(2) solution containing (dpf)(4)Rh(2) which was synthesized according to a method described previously in the literature. Compound 1 crystallizes in the triclinic space group P1, with a = 10.164(3) A, b = 13.881(3) A, c = 18.805(4) A, alpha = 73.55(2) degrees, beta = 77.89(2) degrees, gamma = 84.85(2) degrees, and Z = 2. Crystals of 2 were not good enough to collect adequate data for X-ray analysis, but the identity of this compound was confirmed, along with its P1; space group. Crystals of 3 and 4 belong to the monoclinic, P2(1)/c space group and the triclinic, P1; space group, respectively, with a = 13.5254(5) A, b = 13.7387(4) A, c = 27.2011(12) A, beta = 102.637(2) degrees, and Z = 4 for 3 and a = 13.866(8) A, b = 14.756(7) A, c = 15.008(6) A, alpha = 79.91(3) degrees, beta = 87.72(4) degrees, gamma = 89.19(4) degrees, and Z = 1 for 4. Compound 1 exhibits a single reversible oxidation at E(1/2) = 0.66 V and a single reversible reduction at E(1/2) = -0.44 V vs SCE in THF, 0.2 M TBAP. Both processes involve a one-electron transfer. Compound 2 undergoes a reversible oxidation at E(1/2) = 0.60 V and two separate one-electron-transfer reductions at E(1/2) = -0.52 and -0.65 V in THF, 0.2 M TBAP. The oxidation involves two overlapped one-electron-transfer processes. Compounds 3 and 4 undergo two reversible oxidations in CH(2)Cl(2), 0.1 M TBAP located at E(1/2) = 0.23 and 1.22 V (3) or 0.22 and 1.20 V (4). Each redox reaction of 3 involves a one-electron-transfer step while each redox reaction of 4 involves two overlapping one-electron transfers. Compound 2 shows interaction between the two dirhodium cores upon reduction, while 4 gives no evidence of electronic interaction between the two dirhodium units during either reduction or oxidation. An ESR signal with axial symmetry was obtained for the neutral compounds 1 and 2, and a similar spectrum was obtained for the singly oxidized products of compounds 3 and 4, thus suggesting the electronic configuration of (sigma)(2)(pi)(4)(delta)(2)(pi)(4)(delta)(1) for the neutral compounds 1 and 2 as well as for the oxidized compounds 3 and 4. The four compounds were also characterized by FTIR and UV-visible spectroscopy as well as by mass spectrometry.     

Equatorially connected diruthenium(II,III) units toward paramagnetic supramolecular structures with singular magnetic properties

The reaction of Ru2Cl(O2CMe)(DPhF)3 (DPhF = N,N'-diphenylformamidinate) with mono- and polycarboxylic acids gives a clean substitution of the acetate ligand, leading to the formation of complexes Ru2Cl(O2CC6H5)(DPhF)3 (1), Ru2Cl(O2CC6H4-p-CN)(DPhF)3 (2), [Ru2Cl(DPhF)3(H2O)]2(O2C)2 (3), [Ru2Cl(DPhF)3]2[C6H4-p-(CO2)2] (4), and [Ru2Cl(DPhF)3]3[C6H3-1,3,5-(CO2)3] (5). The preparation of [Ru2(NCS)(DPhF)3]3[C6H3-1,3,5-(CO2)3] (6) and {[Ru2(DPhF)3(H2O)]3[C6H3-1,3,5-(CO2)3]}(SO3CF3)3 (7) from 5 is also described. All complexes are characterized by elemental analysis, IR and electronic spectroscopy, mass spectrometry, cyclic voltammetry, and variable-temperature magnetic measurements. The crystal structure determinations of complexes 2.0.5THF and 3.THF.4H2O (THF = tetrahydrofuran) are reported. The reactions carried out demonstrate the high chemical stability of the fragment [Ru2(DPhF)3]2+, which is preserved in all tested experimental conditions. The stability of this fragment is also corroborated by the mass spectra. Electrochemical measurements reveal in all complexes one redox process due to the equilibrium Ru2(5+) <--> Ru2(6+). In the polynuclear complex 7, some additional oxidation processes are also observed that have been ascribed to the presence of two types of dimetallic units rather than two consecutive reversible oxidations. The magnetic behavior toward temperature for complexes 1-7 from 300 to 2 K is analyzed. Complexes 1-7 show low values of antiferromagnetic coupling in accordance with the molecular nature in 1 and 2 and the absence of important antiferromagnetic interaction through the carboxylate bridging ligands in 3-7, respectively. In addition, the magnetic properties of complex 7 do not correspond to any magnetic behavior described for diruthenium(II,III) complexes. The experimental data of compound 7 are simulated considering a physical mixture of S = 1/2 and 3/2 spin states. This magnetic study demonstrates the high sensitivity of the electronic configuration of the unit [Ru2(DPhF)3]2+ to small changes in the nature of the axial ligands. Finally, the energy gap between the pi and delta orbitals in these types of compounds allows the tentative assignment of the transition pi --> delta.