Hamiltonian formulation of Riemann ellipsoid dynamics

A Riemann ellipsoid is a classical fluid with an ellipsoidal boundary whose motion depends linearly on position. The Riemann ellipsoid Newtonian equations of motion are proven to form a Hamiltonian dynamical system. The co-adjoint orbits of a Lie group GCM(3) on which the inertia tensor is positive-definite are the reduced phase spaces of Riemann ellipsoids for which conservation of circulation has been exploited fully.     

Real Hamiltonian forms of Hamiltonian systems

We introduce the notion of a real form of a Hamiltonian dynamical system in analogy with the notion of real forms for simple Lie algebras. This is done by restricting the complexified initial dynamical system to the fixed point set of a given involution. The resulting subspace is isomorphic (but not symplectomorphic) to the initial phase space. Thus to each real Hamiltonian system we are able to associate another nonequivalent (real) ones. A crucial role in this construction is played by the assumed analyticity and the invariance of the Hamiltonian under the involution. We show that if the initial system is Liouville integrable, then its complexification and its real forms will be integrable again and this provides a method of finding new integrable systems starting from known ones. We demonstrate our construction by finding real forms of dynamics for the Toda chain and a family of Calogero-Moser models. For these models we also show that the involution of the complexified phase space induces a Cartan-like involution of their Lax representations.Received: 8 October 2003, Published online: 8 June 2004PACS: 02.30.Ik Integrable systems - 45.20.Jj Lagrangian and Hamiltonian mechanics     

Hamiltonian formulation of theories with higher derivatives

A method of constructing the Hamiltonian formulation for a singular Lagrangian with higher derivatives is discussed. The method allows the specifics of the theory to be taken into account. It is shown that Hamiltonian formulations constructed from the same Lagrangian, but with different methods of introducing the additional generalized coordinates representing the higher derivatives, are related by a canonical point transformation.Translated from Izvestiya Vysshikh Uchebnykh Zavedenii, Fizika, No. 9, pp. 65–68, September, 1985.     

Time-dependent formulation of the linear unitary transformation and the time evolution of general time-dependent quadratic Hamiltonian systems

A time-dependent closed-form formulation of the linear unitary transformation for harmonic-oscillator annihilation and creation operators is presented in the Schrödinger picture using the Lie algebraic approach. The time evolution of the quantum mechanical system described by a general time-dependent quadratic Hamiltonian is investigated by combining this formulation with the time evolution equation of the system. The analytic expressions of the evolution operator and propagator are found. The motion of a charged particle with variable mass in the time-dependent electric field is considered as an illustrative example of the formalism. The exact time evolution wave function starting from a Gaussian wave packet and the operator expectation values with respect to the complicated evolution wave function are obtained readily.     

Hamiltonian formulation for the positron trapping model

Summary A Hamiltonian formulation is used to build up an adequate Hamiltonian for the positron trapping model. The number of positrons annihilated in the free state,n _f, or the trapped one,n _v, are considered canonical conjugate variables; this point of view provides a route to propose a Hamiltonian which leads to the previously proposed phenomenological master equations.

---

Riassunto Si usa una formulazione hamiltoniana per elaborare un'hamiltoniana adeguata per il modello a trappola dei positroni. Il numero di positroni annichilati nello stato libero,n _f, o in quello intrappolato,n _v, è considerato come variabili coniugate canoniche; in questo senso si fornisce una via per proporre un'hamiltoniana che porti alle equazioni principali fenomenologiche proposte precedentemente.

---

Резюме Гамильтонова формулировка используется для конструирования адекватного Гамильтониана для модели захвата позитрона. Число аннигилированных позитронов в свободном состоянии,n _f, или число захваченных позитронов,n _v, рассматриваются как канонически сопряженные переменные. Этот подход приводит к Гамильтониану. Который дает ранее предположенные феноменологические ?управляющие? уравнения.

     

Sequential contact transformation formulation of asymmetric-rotator vibration-rotation Hamiltonian

The sequential contact transformation technique recently described in this journal by Niroomand-Rad and Parker is applied to the Amat-Nielsen expansion of the Darling-Dennison Hamiltonian of asymmetric rotator type molecules. The resulting formalism for the calculation of fourth-order Hamiltonian coefficients is significantly simpler than the conventional Amat-Nielsen contact transformation formalism. Therefore the eventual development of detailed expressions for fourth-order vibration-rotation interaction coefficients in terms of fundamental molecular constants now appears much more feasible.     

Hamiltonian formulation of QED in the superaxial gauge

We present a hamiltonian formulation of QED in a fully fixed axial gauge. The equal-time commutators for all field variables are computed and are shown to lead to the correct equations of motion. The constraints and gauge conditions hold as strong operator relations.     

Hamiltonian formulation of the anomalous chiral Schwinger model

We construct the hamiltonian formulation of the anomalous chiral Schwinger model, which has recently been shown to yield a consistent unitary theory. The impact of the anomaly on the constraints of the system is exhibited and the system is quantized using an appropriate hamiltonian consistent with the constraints.     

The Hamiltonian formulation of general relativity: myths and reality

A conventional wisdom often perpetuated in the literature states that: (i) a 3 + 1 decomposition of spacetime into space and time is synonymous with the canonical treatment and this decomposition is essential for any Hamiltonian formulation of General Relativity (GR); (ii) the canonical treatment unavoidably breaks the symmetry between space and time in GR and the resulting algebra of constraints is not the algebra of four-dimensional diffeomorphism; (iii) according to some authors this algebra allows one to derive only spatial diffeomorphism or, according to others, a specific field-dependent and non-covariant four-dimensional diffeomorphism; (iv) the analyses of Dirac [21] and of ADM [22] of the canonical structure of GR are equivalent. We provide some general reasons why these statements should be questioned. Points (i–iii) have been shown to be incorrect in [45] and now we thoroughly re-examine all steps of the Dirac Hamiltonian formulation of GR. By direct calculation we show that Dirac’s references to space-like surfaces are inessential and that such surfaces do not enter his calculations. In addition, we show that his assumption g _0k = 0, used to simplify his calculation of different contributions to the secondary constraints, is unwarranted; yet, remarkably his total Hamiltonian is equivalent to the one computed without the assumption g _0k = 0. The secondary constraints resulting from the conservation of the primary constraints of Dirac are in fact different from the original constraints that Dirac called secondary (also known as the “Hamiltonian” and “diffeomorphism” constraints). The Dirac constraints are instead particular combinations of the constraints which follow directly from the primary constraints. Taking this difference into account we found, using two standard methods, that the generator of the gauge transformation gives diffeomorphism invariance in four-dimensional space-time; and this shows that points (i–iii) above cannot be attributed to the Dirac Hamiltonian formulation of GR. We also demonstrate that ADM and Dirac formulations are related by a transformation of phase-space variables from the metric _{g μν} to lapse and shift functions and the three-metric g _km , which is not canonical. This proves that point (iv) is incorrect. Points (i–iii) are mere consequences of using a non-canonical change of variables and are not an intrinsic property of either the Hamilton-Dirac approach to constrained systems or Einstein’s theory itself.     

Diffusion in Hamiltonian systems

The study is reported of a diffusion in a model of degenerate Hamiltonian systems. The Hamiltonian under consideration is the sum of a linear function of action variables and a periodic function of angle variables. Under certain choices of these functions the diffusion of action variables exists. In the case of two degrees of freedom during the process of diffusion, the vector of the action variables returns many times near its initial value. In the case of three degrees of freedom the choice of Hamiltonian allows one to obtain a diffusion rate faster than any prescribed one. (c) 1998 American Institute of Physics.     

A Hamiltonian formulation of the Einstein-Cartan-Sciama-Kibble theory of gravity

We postulate the energy-momentum functionE for the ECSK theory of gravity and formulate the functional Hamiltonian equation in terms of the energy-momentum functionE and the symplectic 2-form . The system of partial differential equations which follows from the functional Hamilton equation is equivalent to the system of variational equations of the ECSK theory. The Hamiltonian method gives rise to a natural division of these equations into 10 constraint equations and the set of dynamical equations. We discuss the geometric sense of the constraint equations and their relations to the initial value problem.