trans‐[TcNCl2(Ph3PNH)2] — Synthesis and Structure

The neutral technetium(V) phosphoraneimine complex [TcNCl₂(Ph₂PNH)₂] is formed when (Bu₄N)[TcOCl₄] reacts with Me₃SiNPPh₃ in dichloromethane. Distances of 2.078(4) and 2.102(4) Å have been found between Tc and the neutral triphenylphosphoraneimine ligands. The Tc‐N‐P angles are 133.7(3) and 134.8(3)°. The terminal nitrido ligand is formed by decomposition of an additional molecule of Me₃SiNPPh₃. The protons which are used for the protonation of the organic ligands are released during the decomposition of CH₂Cl₂. The same reaction yields the [TcNCl₄]^— anion when it is performed in acetonitrile.     

Rb{Pr6C2}I12, an Iodide with a 13‐Electron Isolated Octahedral {Pr6C2} Cluster

Rb{Pr₆(C)₂}I₁₂ was obtained from a mixture of RbI, PrI₃, Pr and C as black single crystals at elevated temperatures. The black crystals are triclinic, (no. 2), a = 960.1(2), b = 957.0(2), c = 1003.4(2) pm, α = 71.74(2), β = 70.69(2), γ = 72.38(2)°, V = 805.6(3) 10⁶ pm³, Z = 1; R₁ = 0.0868 for all 2749 measured independent reflections. Rb{Pr₆(C)₂}I₁₂ contains {Pr₆(C₂)} clusters isolated from each other, surrounded by twelve edge‐bridging and six terminal ligands. The [{Pr₆(C)₂}Iⁱ₁₂I^a₆]^? units are connected via i‐a/a‐i bridges according to {Pr₆C₂}Iⁱ_6/1I^i‐a_6/2I^a‐i_6/2 with rubidium ions occupying twelve‐coordinate interstices.     

{[2‐FC6H4C(NSiMe3)2Li]4Li2O} — Bildung eines sauerstoffzentrierten Käfigs

{[2‐FC₆H₄C(NSiMe₃)₂Li]₄Li₂O} — Formation of an Oxygen‐centred Cage From the reaction of [2‐FC₆H₄C(NSiMe₃)₂Li]₂·OEt₂ ( 1 ) with water containing toluene the oxygen‐centred cage {[2‐FC₆H₄C(NSiMe₃)₂Li]₄Li₂O} ( 2 ) was obtained. The formation of the cage structure, which contains a central Li₆O‐unit, can be explained by using the laddering principle.     

Oxidative C‐C Coupling of Dilithium (2‐Pyridylmethanidyl)(tert‐butyldimethylsilyl)amide with White Phosphorus

(2‐Pyridylmethyl)(tert‐butyldimethylsilyl)amine ( 1 ) can be lithiated once or twice yielding lithium (2‐pyridylmethyl)(tert‐butyldimethylsilyl)amide ( 2 ) and dilithium (2‐pyridylmethanidyl)(tert‐butyldimethylsilyl)amide ( 3 ), respectively. The oxidation of 3 with white phosphorus yields dilithium 1,2‐dipyridyl‐1,2‐bis(tert‐butyldimethylsilylamido)ethane ( 4 ) which crystallizes after partial hydrolysis as an adduct of the form 2 · 4 .     

2‐Chloro‐1, 3‐diisopropyl‐4, 5‐dimethylimidazolium Dichlorophosphate. First Structural Characterisation of the [PO2Cl2]— Anion [1]

The X‐ray structure of 2‐Chloro‐1, 3‐diisopropyl‐4, 5‐dimethylimidazolium dichlorophosphate ( 2 ) (obtained from 2‐chloro‐1, 3‐diisopropyl‐4, 5‐dimethylimidazolium chloride 1 and POCl₃ in the presence of water) is reported.     

Palladium(II) Complexes with the Mixed‐Donor Ligand CH3S‐(CH2)3‐PPh2 Crystal Structures of [PdCl2{CH3S‐(CH2)3‐PPh2}n](n = 1, 2)

The phosphorus‐sulfur ligand 1‐(methylthio)‐3‐(diphenylphosphino)‐propane (S‐P3) has been synthesized and characterized by ¹H NMR and ¹³C NMR. Reactions of S‐P3 with [PdCl₂(PhCN)₂] afforded the complexes [PdCl₂(S‐P3)] ( I ) and [PdCl₂(S‐P3)₂] ( II ), in which S‐P3 acts as a bidentate and monodentate ligand, respectively. Compound I crystallizes in monoclinic space group P2₁/n (No. 14) with cell dimensions: a = 8.589(3), b = 15.051(3), c = 17.100(3)Å, β = 102.91(2)°, V = 2154.7(9)ų, Z = 4. Likewise, compound II crystallizes in monoclinic space group P2₁/n (No. 14) with a = 9.993(5), b = 8.613(4), c = 18.721(5)Å, β = 90.18(3)°, V = 1611.3(12)ų, Z = 2. Compound II has a trans square planar configuration with only the P‐site of the ligand bonded to the palladium atom.     

Lanthanide(II) Complexes of the Dihydrotriazinido Ligand [N{C(Ph)=N}2C(tBu)Ph]−

The potassium dihydrotriazinide K(L^Ph,tBu) ( 1 ) was obtained by a metal exchange route from [Li(L^Ph,tBu)(THF)₃] and KOtBu (L^Ph,tBu = [N{C(Ph)=N}₂C(tBu)Ph]). Reaction of 1 with 1 or 0.5 equivalents of SmI₂(thf)₂ yielded the monosubstituted Sm^II complex [Sm(L^Ph,tBu)I(THF)₄] ( 2 ) or the disubstituted [Sm(L^Ph,tBu)₂(THF)₂] ( 3 ), respectively. Attempted synthesis of a heteroleptic Sm^II amido‐alkyl complex by the reaction of 2 with KCH₂Ph produced compound 3 due to ligand redistribution. The Yb^II bis(dihydrotriazinide) [Yb(L^Ph,tBu)₂(THF)₂] ( 4 ) was isolated from the 1:1 reaction of YbI₂(THF)₂ and 1 . Molecular structures of the crystalline compounds 2 , 3· 2C₆H₆ and 4· PhMe were determined by X‐ray crystallography.     

{Ph2(Carb)P}MCl3 (M = Pd,Pt; Carb = 2,3-dihydro-1,3-diisopropyl-4,5dimethylimidazol-2-ylidene) – a Novel Cationic Phosphane Ligand [1]

The phosphane ligand [Ph₂(Carb)P]⁺ forms neutral complexes {Ph₂(Carb)P}MCl₃ (Carb = 2,3-dihydro-1,3-diisopropyl-4,5-dimethylimidazol-2-ylidene; M = Pd, Pt) through the reaction of it's chloride salt with (PhCN)₂MCl₂; the triarylphosphane type properties of the ligand are revealed by n.m.r. and structural data.     

Darstellung,Charakterisierung und Struktur funktionalisierter Fluorphosphaalkene des Typs R3E–P=C(F)NEt2 (R/E = Me/Si,Me/Ge,CF3/Ge,Me/Sn)

Preparation, Characterization, and Structure of Functionalized Fluorophosphaalkenes of the Type R₃E–P=C(F)NEt₂ (R/E = Me/Si, Me/Ge, CF₃/Ge, Me/Sn) P‐functionalized 1‐diethylamino‐1‐fluoro‐2‐phosphaalkenes of the type R₃E–P=C(F)NEt₂ [R/E = Me/Si ( 2 ), Me/Ge ( 3 ), CF₃/Ge ( 4 ), Me/Sn ( 5 )] are prepared by reaction of HP=C(F)NEt₂ ( 1 , E/Z = 18/82) with R₃EX (X = I, Cl) in the presence of triethylamine as base, exclusively as Z‐Isomers. 2–5 are thermolabile, so that only the more stable representatives 2 and 4 can be isolated in pure form and fully characterized. 3 and 5 decompose already at temperatures above –10 °C, but are clearly identified by ¹⁹F and ³¹P NMR‐measurements. The Z configuration is established on the basis of typical NMR data, an X‐ray diffraction analysis of 4 and ab initio calculations for E and Z configurations of the model compound Me₃Si–P=C(F)NMe₂. The relatively stable derivative 2 is used as an educt for reactions with pivaloyl‐, adamantoyl‐, and benzoylchloride, respectively, which by cleavage of the Si–P bond yield the push/pull phosphaalkenes RC(O)–P=C(F)NEt₂ [R = tBu ( 6 ), Ad ( 7 ), Ph ( 8 )], in which π‐delocalization with the P=C double bond occurs both with the lone pair on nitrogen and with the carbonyl group.     

[Fe2(μsb‐CO)(CO)3(NO)(μ‐PtBu2)(μ‐Ph2PCH2PPh2)]: Synthese,Kristallstruktur und Koordinationsisomerie

[Fe₂(μ_sb‐CO)(CO)₃(NO)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂)]: Synthesis, X‐ray Crystal Structure and Isomerization Na[Fe₂(μ‐CO)(CO)₆(μ‐P^tBu₂)] ( 1 ) reacts with [NO][BF₄] at —60 °C in THF to the nitrosyl complex [Fe₂(CO)₆(NO)(μ‐P^tBu₂)] ( 2 ). The subsequent reaction of 2 with phosphanes (L) under mild conditions affords the complexes [Fe₂(CO)₅(NO)L(μ‐P^tBu₂)], L = PPh₃, ( 3a ); η‐dppm (dppm = Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂), ( 3b ). In this case the phosphane substitutes one carbonyl ligand at the iron tetracarbonyl fragment in 2 , which was confirmed by the X‐ray crystal structure analysis of 3a . In solution 3b loses one CO ligand very easily to give dppm as bridging ligand on the Fe‐Fe bond. The thus formed compound [Fe₂(CO)₄(NO)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 4 ) occurs in solution in different solvents and over a wide temperature range as a mixture of the two isomers [Fe₂(μ_sb‐CO)(CO)₃(NO)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 4a ) and [Fe₂(CO)₄(μ‐NO)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 4b ). 4a was unambiguously characterized by single‐crystal X‐ray structure analysis while 4b was confirmed both by NMR investigations in solution as well as by means of DFT calculations. Furthermore, the spontaneous reaction of [Fe₂(CO)₄(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 5 ) with NO at —60 °C in toluene yields a complicated mixture of products containing [Fe₂(μ‐CO)(CO)₄(μ‐H)(μ‐P^tBu₂)(μ‐dppm)] ( 6 ) as main product beside the isomers 4a and 4b occuring in very low yields.     

Synthesis and Crystal Structure of Tellurium(II) bis(2‐methoxycarbonylethanethiolate): A Novel Coordination Mode of Tellurium

The tellurium(II) dithiolates Te[SCH₂CH₂C(O)OCH₃]₂, ( 1 ), Te[SCH₂CH₂CH₂SC(O)CH₃]₂, ( 2 ), and Te[SCH₂CH₂CH₂CH₂SC(O)CH₃]₂, ( 3 ) were synthesized from Te(S^tBu)₂ and the corresponding thiol. All compounds are sensitive toward higher temperatures and light and decompose to elemental tellurium and the disulfide. In the solid state, the Te atom of 1 exhibits the novel Te(S₂Te₂) coordination mode. Additionally to the two Te—S bonds, each Te atom forms two long Te···Te contacts to neighboring molecules, leading to a coordination number of four and a distorted sawhorse configuration. No intramolecular Te···O interactions are present in the solid state, in accordance with ab initio calculations (MP2/ecp‐basis) for the isolated molecule. ¹²⁵Te NMR shifts of all compounds lay within a narrow range and close to the respective shift of other Te(SCH₂R)₂ compounds. VT ¹²⁵Te NMR spectra gave no hint to donor acceptor interactions in solution for any of the compounds and thus corroborate results from IR‐spectroscopy, ab initio geometry optimizations, and thermochemical calculations.     

Ab‐initio‐Berechnung des Tetracarbonatoscandat‐Ions in Na5[Sc(CO3)4] · 2 H2O. Einkristallstrukturbestimmung,Schwingungsspektren und thermischer Abbau

Ab Initio Calculation of the Tetracarbonatoscandate‐Ion in Na₅[Sc(CO₃)₄] · 2 H₂O. Single Crystal Structure Determination, Vibrational Spectra, and Thermal Decomposition Normal modes of the tetracarbonatoscandate‐ion, [Sc(CO₃)₄]^5–, were determined by ab initio calculations and were compared with experimental data of Infrared‐ and Raman‐spectra of the compound Na₅[Sc(CO₃)₄] · 2 H₂O. A necessary redetermination of the structure with single crystal x‐ray diffraction data (tetragonal, P42₁c (Nr. 114), Z = 2, a = 746,37(4) pm, c = 1157,0(2) pm, V_EZ = 644,5(1) 10⁶ pm³) allows the discussion of existing hydrogen bonds. Determination of the thermal behaviour indicates a two‐stage decomposition reaction, but no corresponding intermediate could be isolated.     

Synthesis and Characterization of 1,3,2‐Bis (arylamino) phospholidine, 2‐oxide Derivatives: Crystal Structures of $\rm Cl(O)\overline{PN(p-Me-C_{6}H_{4})CH_{2}CH_{2}N}(p-Me-C_{6}H_{4})$ and $\rm ((CH_{2}C_{6}H_{5})(O)\overline{PN(p-Me-C_{6}H_{4})CH_{2}CH_{2}N}(p-Me-C_{6}H_{4})$

Using phosphoryl chloride as a substrate, a family of 1,3,2‐bis(arylamino) phospholidine, 2‐oxide of the general formula ; (X=Cl, 6a ; X=NMe₂, 1b ; X=N(CH₂C₆H₅)(CH₃), 2b ; X=NHC(O)C₆H₅, 3b ; X=4Me‐C₆H₄O, 4b ; X=C₆H₅O, 5b ; X=NHC₆H₁₁, 6b ; X=OC₄H₈N, 7b ; X=C₅H₁₀N, 8b ; X=NH₂, 9b ; X=F, 10b and Ar=4Me‐C₆H₄) was prepared and characterized by ¹H, ¹⁹F, ³¹P and ¹³C NMR and IR spectroscopy, and elemental analysis. A general and practical method for the synthesis of these compounds was selected. The structures of 6a and 2b were determined by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction techniques. The low temperature NMR spectra of 2b revealed the restricted rotation of P‐N bond according to two independent molecules in crystalline lattice.     

Tellurium‐Halogen Secondary Bonding in the Crystal Structures of [Q]+[PhTeCl4]— (Q = C5NH6, 2‐Br‐C5NH5, {2‐Br‐C5NH5}{Co(NH3)4Cl2})

The reaction of diphenylditelluride with pyridine, 2‐bromopyridine or 2‐bromopyridine/tetraamminedichlorocobalt(III) chloride in 12 M hydrochloric acid afforded the tetrachlorophenyltellurate(IV) compounds [C₅NH₆][PhTeCl₄] ( 1 ), [2‐Br‐C₅NH₅] [PhTeCl₄] ( 2 ), and [{2‐Br‐C₅NH₅}{Co(NH₃)₄Cl₂}] [PhTeCl₄]₂ ( 3 ). They were all characterized structurally by single crystal X‐ray diffraction. In all structures, the arrangement about the tellurium atoms is square pyramidal. The [PhTeCl₄]^— anions in 1 and 2 form trimeric and dimeric units, respectively, through Te···Cl secondary bonding. Compound 3 shows an unusual face‐to‐face packing of the [PhTeCl₄]^—anions with hydrogen bonding to the bromopyridium cation.     

2J(P,C) and 3J(P,C) Coupling Constants in Some New Phosphoramidates. Crystal Structures of CF3C(O)N(H)P(O)[N(CH3)(CH2C6H5)]2 and 4‐NO2‐C6H4N(H)P(O)[4‐CH3‐NC5H9]2

Some new phosphoramidates were synthesized and characterized by ¹H, ¹³C, ³¹P NMR, IR spectroscopy and elemental analysis. The structures of CF₃C(O)N(H)P(O)[N(CH₃)(CH₂C₆H₅)]₂ ( 1 ) and 4‐NO₂‐C₆H₄N(H)P(O)[4‐CH₃‐NC₅H₉]₂ ( 6 ) were confirmed by X‐ray single crystal determination. Compound 1 forms a centrosymmetric dimer and compound 6 forms a polymeric zigzag chain, both via ‐N‐H…O=P‐ intermolecular hydrogen bonds. Also, weak C‐H…F and C‐H…O hydrogen bonds were observed in compounds 1 and 6 , respectively. ¹³C NMR spectra were used for study of ²J(P,C) and ³J(P,C) coupling constants that were showed in the molecules containing N(C₂H₅)₂ and N(C₂H₅)(CH₂C₆H₅) moieties, ²J(P,C)>³J(P,C). A contrast result was obtained for the compounds involving a five‐membered ring aliphatic amine group, NC₄H₈. ²J(P,C) for N(C₂H₅)₂ moiety and in NC₄H₈ are nearly the same, but ³J(P, C) values are larger than those in molecules with a pyrrolidinyl ring. This comparison was done for compounds with six and seven‐membered ring amine groups. In compounds with formula XP(O)[N(CH₂R)(CH₂C₆H₅)]₂, ²J(P,CH₂)_benzylic>²J(P,CH₂)_aliphatic, in an agreement with our previous study.     

Ligand Dynamics in the Solid: Lithium‐fluorenide and Lithium‐benzo[b]fluorenide N,N,N′,N′‐Tetramethylethylenediamine (tmeda) Complexes

The dynamic behavior of the N,N,N′,N′‐tetramethylethylenediamine (tmeda) ligand has been studied in solid lithium‐fluorenide(tmeda) ( 3 ) and lithium‐benzo[b]fluorenide(tmeda) ( 4 ) using CP/MAS solid‐state ¹³C‐ and ¹⁵N‐NMR spectroscopy. It is shown that, in the ground state, the tmeda ligand is oriented parallel to the long molecular axis of the fluorenide and benzo[b]fluorenide systems. At low temperature (<250 K), the ¹³C‐NMR spectrum exhibits two MeN signals. A dynamic process, assigned to a 180° rotation of the five‐membered metallacycle (π‐flip), leads at elevated temperatures to coalescence of these signals. Line‐shape calculations yield ΔH^?=42.7 kJ mol^?1, ΔS^?=?5.3 J mol^?1 K^?1, and =44.3 kJ mol^?1 for 3 , and ΔH^?=36.8 kJ mol^?1, ΔS^?=?17.7 J mol^?1 K^?1, and =42.1 kJ mol^?1 for 4 , respectively. A second dynamic process, assigned to ring inversion of the tmeda ligand, was detected from the temperature dependence of T_1ρ, the ¹³C spin‐lattice relaxation time in the rotating frame, and led to ΔH^?=24.8 kJ mol^?1, ΔS^?=?49.2 J mol^?1 K^?1, and =39.5 kJ mol^?1 for 3 , and ΔH^?=18.2 kJ mol^?1, ΔS^?=?65.3 J mol^?1 K^?1, and =37.7 kJ mol^?1 for 4 , respectively. For (D₁₂)‐ 3 , the rotation of the CD₃ groups has also been studied, and a barrier E_a of 14.1 kJ mol^?1 was found.     

Non‐Planar Lithium‐Phthalocyanine in the Double Salt (nBu4N)2[Lipc]PF6

We report the synthesis of the diamagnetic double salt bis(tetra(n‐butyl)ammonium) phthalocyanato(2‐)lithate hexafluorophosphate (nBu₄N)₂[Lipc]PF₆ [pc = phthalocyanine, nBu₄N⁺ = tetra(n‐butyl)ammonium] in dme (dme = dimethoxyethane). According to single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction structure analysis [P$\bar{1}$ , a = 8.642(2) Å, b = 12.820(3) Å, c = 15.019(3) Å, α = 83.01(3)°, β = 87.87(3)°, γ = 74.45(3)°, Z = 1, R₁ = 6.4 %], the phthalocyanine building bloc shows a substantial distortion of the macrocyclic ring from planarity. The deviation from D_4h symmetry originates from packing effects induced by the two tetra(n‐butyl)ammonium cations located above and below the macrocycle. DFT structure optimization starting from the experimental non‐planar configuration produces a fully planar complex anion [Lipc]^–.     

Synthesis and Structures of Homoleptic Methyl‐ and Phenylthiomethylaluminium Complexes [Al(CH2SR)3](R = Me,Ph)

Sulfur‐substituted methylmercury compounds [Hg(CH₂SR)₂]( 1a, R = Me; 1b, R = Ph ) react with aluminium amalgam in refluxing toluene with transmetallation to give homoleptic tris(thiomethyl)aluminium complexes [Al(CH₂SR)₃]( 2a, R = Me; 2b, R = Ph ) (degree of conversion: >80%, isolated yields: 2a 63%, 2b 41%). Their identities were confirmed by NMR spectros‐copy (¹H, ¹³C) and X‐ray crystal structure analyses. In crystals of compound 2a the aluminium atoms possess a trigonal‐bipyramidal arrangement with the coordination polyhedron defined by three carbon and two sulfur atoms. Two of the three CH₂SMe ligands are bridging ligands (μ‐η²; 1kC:2kS), the third one is terminal bound (η¹; kC). The structure is polymeric. Crystals are threaded by helical chains built up of six‐membered Al₂C₂S₂ rings. Crystals of 2b are built up of centrosymmetrical dimers with six‐membered Al₂C₂S₂ rings having bridging CH₂SPh ligands (μ‐η²; 1kC:2kS). On each Al atom two terminal (η¹; kC)CH₂SPh ligands are bound. They exhibit quite different Al‐C‐S angles (116.7(4) and 106.5(3)?). Similar values (114.32115.7? and 109.52109.9?) were found in ab initio calculations of model compounds [{Al(CH₂SR)₃}₂]( 3a, R=H; 3b, R=Me; 3c, R=CH=CH₂ ). A conformational energy diagram for rotation of one of the terminal CH₂SH ligand in the parent compound 3a around the Al‐C bond is discussed in terms of repulsive interactions of lone electron pairs of sulfur atoms.