Preparation and Crystal Structure of the Clathrate‐I Cs8–xGe44+y□2–y

The clathrate‐I phase Cs_8–xGe_44+y□_2–y (space group Pm$\bar{3}$ n) was prepared by high‐pressure high‐temperature reactions of Cs₄Ge₄ and α‐Ge. Different reaction conditions were found to have a strong influence on the lattice parameter of the clathrate‐I phase ranging from 10.8070(2) Å to 10.8493(3) Å. A single crystal with composition Cs₈Ge_44.40(2)□_1.60(2) was obtained from a sample with a = 10.8238(2) Å (niobium ampoule, p = 3.4 GPa, T_max = 1400 °C). Structure analysis based on X‐ray single crystal data shows unambiguously an excess of germanium atoms with respect to the electron balanced composition Cs₈Ge₄₄□₂ on basis of the Zintl concept.     

Neue Germanide mit geordneter Ce3Pt4Ge6‐Struktur – Die Verbindungen Ln3Pt4Ge6 (Ln: Pr–Dy)

New Germanides with an Ordered Variant of the Ce₃Pt₄Ge₆ Type of Structure – The Compounds Ln₃Pt₄Ge₆ (Ln: Pr–Dy) Six new germanides Ln₃Pt₄Ge₆ with Ln = Pr–Dy were synthesized by heating mixtures of the elements at 900 °C, annealing the inhomogeneous powders at 1050‐1100 °C for six days and then cooling down from 700 °C in the course of two months. The crystal structures of Pr₃Pt₄Ge₆ (a = 26.131(5), b = 4.399(1), c = 8.820(2) Å), Sm₃Pt₄Ge₆ (a = 25.974(3), b = 4.356(1), c = 8.748(1) Å), and Dy₃Pt₄Ge₆ (a = 26.079(5), b = 4.311(1), c = 8.729(2) Å) were determined by single crystal X‐ray methods. The compounds are isotypic (Pnma, Z = 4) and crystallize with an ordered variant of the Ce₃Pt₄Ge₆ type of structure (Cmcm, Z = 2) consisting of CaBe₂Ge₂‐ and YIrGe₂‐analogous units. The platinum atoms are located in distorted square pyramids of germanium atoms and build up with them a three‐dimensional network. The coordination polyhedra of the platinum and germanium atoms around the rare‐earth metal atoms are pentagonal and hexagonal prisms. These are completed by some additional atoms resulting in coordination numbers of 14 and 15 respectively. The other germanides were investigated by powder methods resulting in the following lattice constants: a = 26.067(6), b = 4.388(1), c = 8.800(2) Å for Ln = Nd; a = 25.955(7), b = 4.337(1), c = 8.728(2) Å for Ln = Gd; a = 25.944(5), b = 4.322(1), c = 8.698(2) Å for Ln = Tb. The atomic arrangement of Ln₃Pt₄Ge₆ is compared with the well‐known monoclinic structure of Y₃Pt₄Ge₆.     

Ge Pairs and Sb Ribbons in Rare‐Earth Germanium Antimonides RE12Ge7−xSb21 (RE=La–Pr)

The ternary rare‐earth germanium antimonides RE₁₂Ge_7?xSb₂₁ (RE=La–Pr; x=0.4–0.5) are synthesized by direct reactions of the elements. Single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction studies indicate that they adopt a new structure type (space group Immm, Z=2, a=4.3165(4)–4.2578(2) Å, b=15.2050(12)–14.9777(7) Å, c=34.443(3)–33.9376(16) Å in the progression from RE=La to Pr), integrating complex features found in RE₆Ge_5?xSb_11+x and RE₁₂Ga₄Sb₂₃. A three‐dimensional polyanionic framework, consisting of Ge pairs and Sb ribbons, outlines large channels occupied by columns of face‐sharing RE₆ trigonal prisms. These trigonal prisms are centered by additional Ge and Sb atoms to form GeSb₃ trigonal‐planar units. A bonding analysis attempted through a Zintl–Klemm approach suggests that full electron transfer from the RE atoms to the anionic substructure cannot be assumed. This is confirmed by band‐structure calculations, which also reveal the importance of Ge? Sb and Sb? Sb bonding. Magnetic measurements on Ce₁₂Ge_6.5Sb₂₁ indicate antiferromagnetic coupling but no long‐range ordering down to 2 K.     

Kristallstrukturen aus CaBe2Ge2‐ und CeMg2Si2‐analogen Blöcken: Die Phosphide LnPt2P2−x (Ln: La,Sm)

Crystal Structures of CaBe₂Ge₂ and CeMg₂Si₂ analogous Units: The Phosphides LnPt₂P_2?x (Ln: La, Sm) Single crystals of LaPt₂P_1.44 (a = 4.174(1), c = 19.212(5) Å) were grown by reaction of vaporous phosphorus with LaPt₂ at 1050 °C during two weeks, whereas SmPt₂P_1.50 (a = 4.131(1), c = 19.086(4) Å) was synthesized by heating mixtures of the elements at 900 and 1100 °C (60 h) and annealing at 1050 °C (300 h). Both phosphides were investigated by single crystal X‐ray methods. Their crystal structures (I4/mmm; Z = 4) consist of CaBe₂Ge₂ and CeMg₂Si₂ analogous units alternating with each other along [001]. The positions of the P1 atoms are occupied incompletely causing the deviation to the 1:2:2 stoichiometry. Another compounds LnPt₂P_2?x were studied by X‐ray powder diffraction resulting in the following lattice constants: a = 4.150(1), c = 19.132(5) Å for CePt₂P_2–x, a = 4.137(1), c = 19.085(4) Å for PrPt₂P_2?x, and a = 4.127(1), c = 19.040(2) Å for NdPt₂P_2?x.     

Red and yellow solvates of chloro­(2,2′:6′,2′′‐terpyridine)platinum(II) chloride and Pt⋯Pt inter­actions

Crystallization of chloro­(2,2′:6′,2′′‐terpyridine)platinum(II) chloride from dimethyl sulfoxide yields a red polymorph, [PtCl(C₁₅H₁₁N₃)]Cl·C₂H₆OS, (I), which exhibits stacking along the a axis through pairs of Pt⋯Pt(−x, −y, −z) inter­actions of 3.3155 (8) Å. The cations are further associated through close Pt⋯Pt(1 − x, −y, −z) distances of 3.4360 (8) Å. Recrystallization from water gives a mero­hedrally twinned yellow–orange dihydrate form, [PtCl(C₁₅H₁₁N₃)]Cl·2H₂O, (II), with pairwise short Pt⋯Pt(1 − x, 2 − y, −z) contacts of 3.3903 (5) Å but no long‐range stacking through the crystals. Inter­pair Pt⋯Pt(−x, 2 − y, −z) distances between cation pairs in the hydrate are 4.3269 (5) Å.     

Inorganic−Organic Hybrid Polymers via Hydrothermal Syntheses: Tetraaquahexakis(pyrazine‐2‐carboxylato)pentacopper(4+) Hexacosaoxooctamolybdate(4−) Polymer ({[Cu5(pzca)6(H2O)4][Mo8O26]}n; pzca=Pyrazine‐2‐carboxylate) and Dicopperdecaoxo(pyrazine)trimolybdenum Polymer ([Mo3Cu2O10(pz)]n; pz=pyrazine)

Hydrothermal reactions of MoO₃, CuO, and pyrazine‐2‐carboxylic acid (Hpzca) resulted in two polymeric complexes, {[Cu₅(pzca)₆(H₂O)₄][Mo₈O₂₆]}_n ( 1 ; pzca=pyrazine‐2‐carboxylate) and [Mo₃Cu₂O₁₀(pz)]_n ( 2 ; pz=pyrazine). The former crystallized in the monoclinic space group P2₁/c with a=10.805(3) Å, b=13.061(5) Å, c=13.337(10) Å, β=90.20(4)°, V=2729(2) ų, and Z=2. The later crystallized in the orthorhombic space group Pnma with a=12.385(2) Å, b=7.6044(9) Å, c=12.7880(14) Å, V=1204.4(2) ų, and Z=4. X‐Ray diffraction analysis revealed that 1 possesses a two‐dimensional wave‐like structure, formed from a zigzag one‐dimensional chain, and 2 is a three‐dimensional network structure formed from a one‐dimensional chain and a pz bridging ligand. The temperature‐dependent magnetic behavior of 1 was studied.     

Crystal structure of the Fe6−xGayGe5−y (x ∼0.5, y = 1.3) ternary compound

The single crystal of Fe_6−xGa_yGe_5−y (x ∼0.5, y = 1.3(1)) has been obtained from arc-melting of the elements and its crystal structure has been investigated by single-crystal X-ray diffraction analysis. The compound crystallizes in the hexagonal space group P6₃/mmc (No. 194) with a = 8.0346(2) Å, c = 5.007(1) Å, Z = 1 and adopts the Ti₆Sn₅ structure type with a refined composition of Fe_5.52(12)(Ga/Ge)₅. By a mean of scanning electron microscopy the composition of the single crystal has been determined as Fe_4.9(2)Ga_1.3(1)Ge_3.7(1). The crystal structures of the Fe_6−xGa_yGe_5−y (x ∼0.5, y = 1.3(1)) and all compounds in the Fe–Ge binary system have been crystallographically analyzed and structural relationship has been established.     

Ce2Ti2SiO9 – das erste Titanat‐Silicat mit Cer – Präparation,Charakterisierung und Struktur

Ce₂Ti₂SiO₉ – the First Titanate‐Silicate with Cerium – Preparation, Characterization, and Structure Ce₂Ti₂SiO₉ was synthesized by chemical vapour transport in a temperature gradient (1050 °C → 900 °C) using Ce₂Ti₂O₇ as precursor and ammoniumchloride as transport agent. SiO₂ was provided from the wall of the used silica tubes. The chemical composition of the crystals was determined by EDX and EELS analysis. The structure of Ce₂Ti₂SiO₉ was determined and refined to R1 = 0.025, _wR2 = 0.067, respectively. The monoclinic phase crystallizes in the space group C2/m (No. 12) with a = 16.907(3) Å, b = 5.7078(8) Å, c = 7.574(2) Å, β = 111.38(2)° and Z = 4. Ti is octahedral, Si is tetrahedral surrounded by oxygen. Ce(1) is coordinated by eight, Ce(2) by ten oxygen atoms. There are edge connected chains of Ti(1)–O‐octahedra parallel [010] which are connected along [001] with each other by Ti(2)–O‐octahedra‐pairs and Si–O‐tetrahedra.     

2‐(4‐Bromophenyl)‐1,2‐dihydropyrimido[1,2‐a]benzimidazol‐4(3H)‐one and 4‐(4‐methylphenyl)‐3,4‐dihydropyrimido[1,2‐a]benzimidazol‐2(1H)‐one form hydrogen‐bonded base‐paired dimers

The title compounds, 2‐(4‐bromo­phenyl)‐1,2‐di­hydro­pyrimido­[1,2‐a]­benzimidazol‐4‐(3H)‐one, C₁₆H₁₂Br­N₃O, (IVa), and 4‐(4‐methylphenyl)‐3,4‐dihydropyrimido[1,2‐a]benzimidazol‐2‐(1H)‐one, C₁₇H₁₅N₃O, (Vb), both form R(8) centrosymmetric dimers via N—H?N hydrogen bonds. The N?N distance is 2.943 (3) Å for (IVa) and 2.8481 (16) Å for (Vb), with the corresponding N—H?N angles being 129 and 167°, respectively. However, in other respects, the supra­molecular structures of the two compounds differ. Both compounds contain different C—H?π interactions, in which the C—H?π(centroid) distances are 2.59 and 2.47 Å for (IVa) and (Vb), respectively (the latter being a short distance), with C—H?π(centroid) angles of 158 and 159°, respectively. The supramolecular structures also differ, with a short Br?O distance of 3.117 (2) Å in bromo derivative (IVa), and a C—H?O interaction with a C?O distance of 3.2561 (19) Å and a C—H?O angle of 127° in tolyl system (Vb). The di­hydro­pyrimido part of (Vb) is disordered, with a ratio of the major and minor components of 0.9:0.1. The disorder consists of two non‐interchangeable envelope conformers, each with an equatorial tolyl group and an axial methine H atom.     

σ‐Aromaticity‐Induced Stabilization of Heterometallic Supertetrahedral Clusters [Zn6Ge16]4− and [Cd6Ge16]4−

In this work, the largest heterometallic supertetrahedral clusters, [Zn₆Ge₁₆]^4? and [Cd₆Ge₁₆]^4?, were directly self‐assembled through highly‐charged [Ge₄]^4? units and transition metal cations, in which 3‐center–2‐electron σ bonding in Ge₂Zn or Ge₂Cd triangles plays a vital role in the stabilization of the whole structure. The cluster structures have an open framework with a large central cavity of diameter 4.6 Å for Zn and 5.0 Å for Cd, respectively. Time‐dependent HRESI‐MS spectra show that the larger clusters grow from smaller components with a single [Ge₄]^4? and ZnMes₂ units. Calculations performed at the DFT level indicate a very large HOMO–LUMO energy gap in [M₆Ge₁₆]^4? (2.22 eV), suggesting high kinetic stability that may offer opportunities in materials science. These observations offer a new strategy for the assembly of heterometallic clusters with high symmetry.     

Synthese und Kristallstrukturen des Zink‐Rhodiumborids Zn5Rh8B4 und der Lithium‐ Magnesium‐Rhodiumboride LixMg5−xRh8B4 (x = 1.1 und 0.5) und Li8Mg4Rh19B12

Synthesis and Crystal Structures of Zinc Rhodium Boride Zn₅Rh₈B₄ and the Lithium Magnesium Rhodium Borides Li_xMg_5?xRh₈B₄ (x = 1.1 and 0.5) and Li₈Mg₄Rh₁₉B₁₂ The title compounds were prepared by reaction of the elemental components in metal ampoules under argon atmosphere (1100 °C, 7 d). In the case of Zn₅Rh₈B₄ (orthorhombic, space group Cmmm, a = 8.467(2) Å, b = 16.787(3) Å, c = 2.846(1) Å, Z = 2) a BN crucible enclosed in a sealed tantalum container was used. The syntheses of Li_xMg_5?xRh₈B₄ (orthorhombic, space group Cmmm, Z = 2, isotypic with Zn₅Rh₈B₄, lattice constants for x = 1.1: a = 8.511(3) Å, b = 16.588(6) Å, c = 2.885(1) Å, and for x = 0.5: a = 8.613(1) Å, b = 16.949(3) Å, c = 2.9139(2) Å) and Li₈Mg₄Rh₁₉B₁₂ (orthorhombic, space group Pbam, a = 26.210(5) Å, b = 13.612(4) Å, c = 2.8530(5) Å, Z = 2) were carried out in tantalum crucibles enclosed in steel containers using lithium as a metal flux. The crystal structures were solved from single crystal X‐ray diffraction data. In both structures Rh atoms reside at z = 0 and all non‐transition metal atoms at z = 1/2. Columns of Rh₆B trigonal prisms running along the c‐axis are laterally connected to form three‐dimensional networks with channels of various cross sections containing Li‐, Mg‐, and Zn‐atoms, respectively. A very short Li‐Li distance of 2.29(7) Å is observed in Li₈Mg₄Rh₁₉B₁₂.     

Die Seltenerdmetallpolyselenide Gd8Se15, Tb8Se15−x,Dy8Se15−x,Ho8Se15−x,Er8Se15−x und Y8Se15−x (0 < x ≤ 0.3) – Zunehmende Fehlordnung in ausgedünnten,planaren Selenschichten

The Rare Earth Metal Polyselenides Gd₈Se₁₅, Tb₈Se_15?x, Dy₈Se_15?x, Ho₈Se_15?x, Er₈Se_15?x, and Y₈Se_15?x – Increasing Disorder in Defective Planar Selenium Layers Single crystals of the rare earth metal polyselenides Gd₈Se₁₅, Tb₈Se_15?x, Dy₈Se_15?x, Ho₈Se_15?x, Er₈Se_15?x, and Y₈Se_15?x (0 < x ≤ 0.3) have been prepared by chemical transport reactions (1120 K→ 970 K, 14 days, I₂ as carrier) starting from pre‐annealed powders of nominal compositions between LnSe₂ and LnSe_1.9. The isostructural title compounds adopt a 3 × 4 × 2 superstructure of the ZrSSi type and can be described in space group Amm2 with lattice parameters of a = 12.161(1) Å, b = 16.212(2) Å and c = 16.631(2) Å (Gd₈Se₁₅), a = 12.094(2) Å, b = 16.123(2) Å and c = 16.550(2) Å (Tb₈Se_15?x), a = 12.036(2) Å, b = 16.060(2) Å and c = 16.475(2) Å (Dy₈Se_15?x), a = 11.993(2) Å, b = 15.999(2) Å and c = 16.471(2) Å (Ho₈Se_15?x), a = 11.908(2) Å, b = 15.921(2) Å and c = 16.428(2) Å (Er₈Se_15?x), and a = 12.045(2) Å, b = 16.072(3) Å and c = 16.626(3) Å (Y₈Se_15?x), respectively. The structure consists of puckered [LnSe] double slabs and planar Se layers alternating along [001]. The planar Se layers contain a disordered arrangement of dimers, Se^2? and vacancies. All compounds are semiconducting and contain trivalent rare earth metals (Ln³⁺).     

Hydrogen‐Bonding in Cyclic 2‐(3‐Oxo‐3‐phenylpropyl)‐Substituted 1,3‐Diketones: 17O‐NMR Spectra and X‐Ray Structure Determination

Structures of cyclic 2‐(3‐oxo‐3‐phenylpropyl)‐substituted 1,3‐diketones 4a – c were determined by ¹⁷O‐NMR spectroscopy and X‐ray crystallography. In CDCl₃ solution, compounds 4a – c form an eight‐membered‐ring with intramolecular H‐bonding between the enolic OH and the carbonyl O(11)‐atom of the phenylpropyl group, as demonstrated by increased shielding of specifically labeled 4a – c in the ¹⁷O‐NMR spectra (Δδ(¹⁷O(11))=36 ppm). In solid state, intermolecular H‐bonding was observed instead of intramolecular H‐bonding, as evidenced by the X‐ray crystal‐structure analysis of compound 4b . Crystals of compound 4b at 293 K are monoclinic with a=11.7927 (12) Å, b=13.6230 (14) Å, c=9.8900 (10) Å, β=107.192 (2)°, and the space group is P2₁/c with Z=4 (refinement to R=0.0557 on 2154 independent reflections).     

Synthesis and Characterization of Two Formyl 2‐Tetrazenes

The synthesis of two formyl 2‐tetrazenes, namely, (E)‐1‐formyl‐1,4,4‐trimethyl‐2‐tetrazene ( 2 ) and (E)‐1,4‐diformyl‐1,4‐dimethyl‐2‐tetrazene ( 3 ), by oxidation of (E)‐1,1,4,4‐tetramethyl‐2‐tetrazene ( 1 ) using potassium permanganate in acetone solution is presented. Compound 3 was also synthesized in an improved yield from the oxidation of 1‐formyl‐1‐methylhydrazine ( 4a ) using potassium permanganate in acetone. Both compounds 2 and 3 were characterized by analytical (elemental analysis, GC‐MS) and spectroscopic methods (¹H, ¹³C, and ¹⁵N NMR spectroscopy, and IR and Raman spectroscopy). In addition, the solid‐state structures of the compounds were confirmed by low‐temperature X‐ray analysis. (Compound 2 : triclinic; space group P‐1; a=5.997(1) Å, b=8.714(1) Å, c=13.830(2) Å; α=107.35(1)°, β=90.53(1)°, γ=103.33(1)°; V_UC=668.9(2) ų; Z=4; ρ_calc=1.292 cm^?3. Compound 3 : monoclinic; space group P2₁/c; a=5.840(2) Å, b=7.414(3) Å, c=8.061(2) Å; β=100.75(3)°; V_UC=342(2) ų; Z=2; ρ_calc=1.396 g cm^?3.) The vibrational frequencies of compounds 2 and 3 were calculated using the B3LYP method with a 6‐311+G(d,p) basis set. We also computed the natural bond orbital (NBO) charges using the rMP2/aug‐cc‐pVDZ method and the heats of formation were determined on the basis of their electronic energies. Furthermore, the thermal stabilities of these compounds, as well as their sensitivity towards classical stimuli, were also assessed by differential scanning calorimetry and standard BAM tests, respectively. Lastly, the attempted synthesis of (E)‐1,2,3,4‐tetraformyl‐2‐tetrazene ( 6 ) is also discussed.     

Synthesis,Crystal, and Electronic Structure of the New Ternary Zintl Phase Eu2–xMg2–yGe3 (x = 0.1; y = 0.5)

The new ternary phase Eu_2–xMg_2–yGe₃ (x = 0.1, y = 0.5) was obtained by solid‐state synthesis and the structure determined by means of Single Crystal X‐ray Diffraction. The compound crystallizes with the orthorhombic space group Cmcm (no. 63) having structural features of the low‐temperature modification of LaSi. The crystal structure contains two different types of germanium anions: isolated Ge^4– and $\rm^{2}_{\infty}$ [Ge^2–x–y] chains. The cation substructure is partially disordered and is best represented assuming a split position. The chemical bonding is well represented by the Zintl‐Klemm concept. Resistivity measurements reveal that the compound is metallic. DFT band structure calculations were carried out on the ideal stoichiometric compound Eu₂Mg₂Ge₃, showing that this model (x = 0; y = 0) would be also metallic as a consequence of the ecliptic stacking of anions. Susceptibility and specific heat measurements evidence the presence of weak, and probably frustrated, antiferromagnetic interactions between disordered europium atoms.     

High‐Pressure Synthesis and Physical Properties of the Europium‐Substituted Barium Clathrate Ba8−xEuxGe43□3 (x ≤ 0.6)

The new clathrate Ba_8–xEuxGe₄₃□₃ (x = 0.6) was synthesized at a pressure of 1 GPa and temperatures of up to 1220 K by means of a multi‐anvil device (Walker module) and a hydraulic 1000 ton press. X‐ray powder diffraction data indicate that the crystal structure of Ba_8–xEuxGe₄₃□₃ (x = 0.6, space group , a = 21.2588(3) Å) corresponds to that of Ba₈Ge₄₃□₃. Measurements of the magnetic susceptibility of Ba_8–xEuxGe₄₃□₃ reveal Curie‐paramagnetic behaviour and prove that the electronic state of europium corresponds to 4f⁷, i.e., Eu²⁺. Electrical resistivity shows a metal‐like temperature dependence and ρ(300) ≈ 2mΩ cm for x = 0.6. Heat capacity measurements reveal an upturn of c_p/T(T) below 7 K that is attributed to magnetic interaction of the europium ions.     

Variationen modulo 4–4+, 4+3–3+4–, 4–5+, 5–4+4–5+4–4+ bei Seltenerdcarbidhalogeniden

The new compounds Pr₈(C₂)₄Cl₅ (1), Pr₁₄(C₂)₇Cl₉ (2), Pr₂₂(C₂)₁₁Cl₁₄ (3), Ce₂(C₂)Cl (4), La₂(C₂)Br (5), Ce₂(C₂)Br (6), Pr₂(C₂)Br (7), Ce₁₈(C₂)₉Cl₁₁ (8), and Ce₂₆(C₂)₁₃Cl₁₆ (9) were prepared by heating mixtures of LnX₃, Ln and carbon or in an alternatively way LnX₃, and “Ln₂C_3–x” in appropriate amounts for several days between 750 and 1200 °C. The crystal structures were investigated by X‐ray powder analysis (5–7) and/or single crystal diffraction (1–4, 8, 9). Pr₈(C₂)₄Cl₅ crystallizes in space group P2₁/c with the lattice parameters a = 7.6169(12), b = 16.689(2), c = 6.7688(2) Å, β = 103.94(1) °, Pr₁₄(C₂)₇Cl₉ in Pc with a = 7.6134(15), b = 29.432(6), c = 6.7705(14) Å, β = 104.00(3) °, Pr₂₂(C₂)₁₁Cl₁₄ in P2₁/c with a = 7.612(2), b = 46.127(9), c = 6.761(1) Å, β = 103.92(3) °, Ce₂(C₂)₂Cl in C2/c with a = 14.573(3), b = 4.129(1), c = 6.696(1) Å, β = 101.37(3) °, La₂(C₂)₂Br in C2/c with a = 15.313(5), b = 4.193(2), c = 6.842(2) Å, β = 100.53(3) °, Ce₂(C₂)₂Br in C2/c with a = 15.120(3), b = 4.179(1), c = 6.743(2) Å, β = 101.09(3) °, Pr₂(C₂)₂Br in C2/c with a = 15.054(5), b = 4.139(1), c = 6.713(3) Å, β = 101.08(3) °, Ce₁₈(C₂)₉Cl₁₁ in P$\bar{1}$ with a = 6.7705(14), b = 7.6573(15), c = 18.980(4) Å,α = 88.90(3) °, β = 80.32(3) °, γ = 76.09(3) °, and Ce₂₆(C₂)₁₃Cl₁₆ in P2₁/c with a = 7.6644(15), b = 54.249(11), c = 6.7956(14) Å, β = 103.98(3) ° The crystal structures are composed of Ln octahedra centered by C₂ dumbbells. Such Ln₆(C₂)‐octahedra are condensed into chains which are joined into undulated sheets. In compounds 1–4 three and four up and down inclined ribbons alternate (4₊4_–, 4₊3_–3₊4_–, 4₊4_–3₊4_–4₊3_–), in compounds 8 and 9 four and five (4₊5_–, 5₊4_–4₊5_–4₊4_–), and in compounds 4–7 one, one ribbons (1₊1_–) are present. The Ln‐(C₂)‐Ln layers are separated by monolayers of X atoms.     

2D l‐Di‐toluoyl‐tartaric acid Lanthanide Coordination Polymers: Toward Single‐component White‐Light and NIR Luminescent Materials

A series of five l ‐di‐p‐toluoyl‐tartaric acid (l ‐DTTA) lanthanide coordination polymers, namely {[Ln₄K⁴ L₆(H₂O)_x]?yH₂O}_n, [Ln=Dy ( 1 ), x=24, y=12; Ln=Ho ( 2 ), x=23, y=12; Ln=Er ( 3 ), x=24, y=12; Ln=Yb ( 4 ), x=24, y=11; Ln=Lu ( 5 ), x=24, y=12] have been isolated by simple reactions of H₂L (H₂L= L ‐DTTA) with LnCl₃?6 H₂O at ambient temperature. X‐ray crystallographic analysis reveals that complexes 1 – 5 feature two‐dimensional (2D) network structures in which the Ln³⁺ ions are bridged by carboxylate groups of ligands in two unique coordinated modes. Luminescent spectra demonstrate that complex 1 realizes single‐component white‐light emission, while complexes 2 – 4 exhibit a characteristic near‐infrared (NIR) luminescence in the solid state at room temperature.     

Tb16Br23B4: Endohedrale Bor‐Atome in tetrameren Terbiumclustern

Tb₁₆Br₂₃B₄: Tetrameric Terbium Clusters with Endohedral Boron Atoms The new cluster compound Tb₁₆Br₂₃B₄ was prepared from a stoichiometric mixture of Tb‐metal, TbBr₃ and B‐powder under Ar‐atmosphere in sealed Ta ampoules at 920–950 °C. It crystallizes monoclinic in the space group C2/m with a = 17.523(4) Å, b = 12.008(2) Å, c = 11.901(2) Å und β = 103.95(3)°. In the crystal structure B‐centered Tb₆ octahedra are connected via common edges to form tetrameric units. The Br atoms connect the Tb₁₆B₄‐clusters 3‐dimensionally coordinating the unoccupied edges and corners of the octahedra. Tb₁₆Br₂₃B₄ is a semiconductor with an electrical band gap of E_g = 0.4 eV. The magnetic susceptibility follows a Curie‐Weiss law corresponding to an effective magnetic moment μ_eff = 9.55 μ_B at high temperatures with an antiferromagnetic ordering below 20 K.     

Chlorine‐Induced Hydrogen‐Bonding Network of A Novel Dimer Based on Nickel and Tridentate Ligand: 3‐Hydrazine‐4‐amino‐1,2,4‐Triazole

The reaction of NiCl₂ and 3‐hydrazine‐4‐amino‐1,2,4‐triazole (Hatr) in the mixed solvent of EtOH and H₂O yielded a dimer compound ([Ni₂(Hatr)₂(H₂O)₂(EtOH)₂Cl₂]Cl₂·EtOH) with water and EtOH molecules coordinated to nickle ions. It crystallized in trigonal space group R‐3, a=b=29.67(1) Å, c=8.95(7) Å, β=120(1)°, as determined by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. Then, they were fully characterized by the IR spectroscopy, differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), thermogravimetry (TG), and elemental analysis.