Ligand design for Rh(iii)-catalyzed C–H activation: an unsymmetrical cyclopentadienyl group enables a regioselective synthesis of dihydroisoquinolones

We report the regioselective synthesis of dihydroisoquinolones from aliphatic alkenes and O-pivaloyl benzhydroxamic acids mediated by a Rh(iii) precatalyst bearing sterically bulky substituents. While the prototypical Cp* ligand provides product with low selectivity, sterically bulky Cp^t affords product with excellent regioselectivity for a range of benzhydroxamic acids and alkenes. Crystallographic evidence offers insight as to the source of the increased regioselectivity.C–H activation mediated processes have provided a unique retrosynthetic approach to access a variety of substituted heterocycles.¹ One tactic that has received increased attention is the coupling of π-components with heteroatom containing molecules.² A variety of transition metals are capable of catalyzing this type of transformation, providing access to dozens of heterocyclic motifs.^1–3 A challenge for these methods is controlling the regioselectivity of migratory insertion across alkenes and alkynes after the metallacycle forming C–H activation (eqn 1).Steric and electronic effects are understood to control migratory insertion of unsymmetrical alkynes in Rh(iii) catalyzed isoquinolone syntheses (eqn 1). When the substituents are electronically similar, the larger group resides β- to Rh in the metallacycle to avoid unfavorable steric interactions (selectivity is generally >10 : 1).⁴ When the substituents are electronically different, the more electron-donating group prefers being α- to rhodium in the metallacycle, presumably to stabilize the electron poor metal.^5,6 The type of C–H bond being activated also plays an important role in the regioselectivity of migratory insertion; aromatic substrates typically provide synthetically useful regioselectivities when electronically different alkynes are used (>10 : 1) but alkenyl C–H activation leads to products with lower regioselectivities, presumably due to minimal steric interactions during migratory insertion.^7,8 We found that sterically bulky di-tert-butylcyclopentadienyl ligand (Cp^t) enhances the regioselectivity of the alkyne migratory insertion event in these cases, delivering regioselectivities (>10 : 1) modestly above those achievable by Cp* ligated Rh complexes (<6 : 1). However, when the alkyne migratory insertion was poorly selective with RhCp* (<3 : 1), RhCp^t complex was ineffective at providing synthetically useful levels of selectivity. Furthermore, the Cp^t ligand was only effective with aryl substituted alkynes, presumably because of strong steric interactions between the ligand and alkyne in the insertion event. Migratory insertion of alkenes to access heterocycles using C–H activation chemistry is still relatively rare, with seminal studies by Glorius and Fagnou reporting the synthesis of dihydroisoquinolones.^9–11 Similar to alkynes, alkenyl electron-donating groups favor the position adjacent to the metal in the metallacycle delivering high regioselectivity. In contrast to alkynes, aliphatic alkenes afford product with poor regioselectivity (2 : 1) (eqn 2).^5h,12 We hypothesized competing steric and electronic effects cause the low regioselectivity, with steric effects favoring the formation of a 4-substituted product and electronics favoring the formation of a 3-substituted product.¹³ As a temporary solution to this problem, our group and others have employed tethering strategies to increase the regioselectivity of the migratory insertion event (eqn 3).^14,15 Of course, regioselectivity controlled by the ligand on Rh would be the optimal solution to the selectivity problem (eqn 4).¹⁶ Consequently, we focused our attention toward developing an intermolecular variant of this reaction that would provide product with improved regioselectivity.As a model system, we explored the impact ligands have on the coupling of O-pivaloyl-benzhydroxamic acid 1a with 1-decene 2a to provide dihydroisoquinolones 3a and 3a′. When Cp* is used as a ligand, the desired products are isolated in excellent yield but poor selectivity (2.4 : 1 3a : 3a′) ( a

Ligand-promoted palladium-catalyzed β-methylene C–H arylation of primary aldehydes

The transient directing group (TDG) strategy allowed long awaited access to the direct β-C(sp³)–H functionalization of unmasked aliphatic aldehydes via palladium catalysis. However, the current techniques are restricted to terminal methyl functionalization, limiting their structural scopes and applicability. Herein, we report the development of a direct Pd-catalyzed methylene β-C–H arylation of linear unmasked aldehydes by using 3-amino-3-methylbutanoic acid as a TDG and 2-pyridone as an external ligand. Density functional theory calculations provided insights into the reaction mechanism and shed light on the roles of the external and transient directing ligands in the catalytic transformation.

Aliphatic aldehydes are among the most common structural units in organic and medicinal chemistry research. Direct C–H functionalization has enabled efficient and site-selective derivatization of aliphatic aldehydes.

Simple aliphatic functional groups enrich the skeletal backbones of many natural products, pharmaceuticals, and other industrial materials, influencing the utility and applications of these substances and dictating their reactivity and synthetic modification pathways. Aliphatic aldehydes are some of the most ubiquitous structural units in organic materials.¹ Their relevance in nature and industry alike, combined with their reactivity and synthetic versatility, attracted much attention from the synthetic organic and medicinal chemistry communities over the years (Fig. 1).² Efficient means to the functionalization of these molecules have always been highly sought after.Open in a separate windowFig. 1Select aliphatic aldehyde-containing medicines and biologically active molecules.Traditionally, scientists have utilized the high reactivity of the aldehyde moiety in derivatizing a variety of functional groups by the means of red-ox and nucleophilic addition reactions. The resourceful moiety was also notoriously used to install functional groups at the α-position via condensation and substitution pathways.³ Although β-functionalization is just as robust, it has generally been more restrictive as it often requires the use of α,β-unsaturated aldehydes.^4,5 Hence, transition metal catalysis emerged as a powerful tool to access β-functionalization in saturated aldehydes.⁶ Most original examples of metal-catalyzed β-C–H functionalization of aliphatic aldehydes required the masking of aldehydes into better metal coordinating units since free unmasked aldehydes could not form stable intermediates with metals like palladium on their own.⁷ Although the masking of the aldehyde moiety into an oxime, for example, enabled the formation of stable 5-membered palladacycles, affording β-functionalized products, this system requires the installation of the directing group prior to the functionalization, as well as the subsequent unmasking upon the reaction completion, compromising the step economy and atom efficiency of the overall process.⁸ Besides, some masking and unmasking protocols might not be compatible with select substrates, especially ones rich in functional groups. As a result, the development of a one-step direct approach to the β-C–H functionalization of free aliphatic aldehydes was a demanding target for synthetic chemists.α-Amino acids have been demonstrated as effective transient directing groups (TDGs) in the remote functionalization of o-alkyl benzaldehydes and aliphatic ketones by the Yu group in 2016.⁹ Shortly after, our group disclosed the first report on the direct β-C–H arylation of aliphatic aldehydes using 3-aminopropanoic acid or 3-amino-3-methylbutanoic acid as a TDG.¹⁰ The TDG was found to play a similar role to that of the oxime directing group by binding to the substrate via reversible imine formation, upon which, it assists in the assembly of a stable palladacycle, effectively functionalizing the β-position.¹¹ Since the binding of the TDG is reversible and temporary, it is automatically removed upon functionalization, yielding an efficient and step-economic transformation. This work was succeeded by many other reports that expanded the reaction and the TDG scopes.^12–14 However, this system suffers from a significant restriction that demanded resolution; only substitution of methyl C–H bonds of linear aldehydes was made possible via this approach (Scheme 1a–e). The steric limitations caused by incorporating additional groups at the β-carbon proved to compromise the formation of the palladacycle intermediate, rendering the subsequent functionalization a difficult task.¹²Open in a separate windowScheme 1Pd-catalyzed β-C–H bond functionalization of aliphatic aldehydes enabled by transient directing groups.Encouraged by the recent surge in use of 2-pyridone ligands to stabilize palladacycle intermediates,^15,16 we have successfully developed the first example of TDG-enabled Pd-catalyzed methylene β-C–H arylation in primary aldehydes via the assistance of 2-pyridones as external ligands (Scheme 1f). The incorporation of 2-pyridones proved to lower the activation energy of the C–H bond cleavage, promoting the formation of the intermediate palladacycles even in the presence of relatively bulky β-substituents.¹⁷ This key advancement significantly broadens the structural scopes and applications of this process and promises future asymmetric possibilities, perhaps via the use of a chiral TDG or external ligand or both. Notably, a closely related work from Yu''s group was published at almost the same time.¹⁸We commenced our investigation of the reaction parameters by employing n-pentanal (1a) as an unbiased linear aldehyde and 4-iodoanisole (2a) in the presence of catalytic Pd(OAc)₂ and stoichiometric AgTFA, alongside 3-amino-3-methylbutanoic acid (TDG1) and 3-(trifluoromethyl)-5-nitropyridin-2-ol (L1) at 100 °C (ii) sources proved Pd(OAc)₂ to be the optimal catalyst, while Pd(TFA)₂, PdCl₂ and PdBr₂ provided only moderate yields (entries 10–12). Notably, a significantly lower yield was observed in the absence of the 2-pyridone ligand, and no desired product was isolated altogether in the absence of the TDG (entries 13 and 14). The incorporation of 15 mol% Pd catalyst was deemed necessary after only 55% yield of 3a was obtained when 10 mol% loading of Pd(OAc)₂ was instead used (entry 15).Optimization of reaction conditions^a

Entry	Pd source	L (mol%)	TDG1 (mol%)	Solvent (v/v, mL)	Yield (%)
1	Pd(OAc)2	L1 (30)	TDG1 (40)	HFIP	30
2	Pd(OAc)2	L1 (30)	TDG1 (40)	AcOH	<5
3	Pd(OAc)2	L1 (30)	TDG1 (40)	HFIP/AcOH (1 : 1)	28
4	Pd(OAc)2	L1 (30)	TDG1 (40)	HFIP/AcOH (9 : 1)	47
5	Pd(OAc)2	L1 (30)	TDG1 (40)	HFIP/AcOH (1 : 9)	<5
6	Pd(OAc)2	L1 (30)	TDG1 (60)	HFIP/AcOH (9 : 1)	50
7	Pd(OAc)2	L1 (30)	TDG1 (80)	HFIP/AcOH (9 : 1)	25
8	Pd(OAc)2	L1 (60)	TDG1 (60)	HFIP/AcOH (9 : 1)	70(68)b
9	Pd(OAc)2	L1 (75)	TDG1 (60)	HFIP/AcOH (9 : 1)	51
10	Pd(TFA)2	L1 (60)	TDG1 (60)	HFIP/AcOH (9 : 1)	60
11	PdCl2	L1 (60)	TDG1 (60)	HFIP/AcOH (9 : 1)	52
12	PdBr2	L1 (60)	TDG1 (60)	HFIP/AcOH (9 : 1)	54
13	Pd(OAc)2	—	TDG1 (60)	HFIP/AcOH (9 : 1)	9
14	Pd(OAc)2	L1 (60)	—	HFIP/AcOH (9 : 1)	0
15c	Pd(OAc)2	L1 (60)	TDG1 (60)	HFIP/AcOH (9 : 1)	55

Open in a separate window^aReaction conditions: 1a (0.2 mmol), 2a (0.4 mmol), Pd source (15 mol%), AgTFA (0.3 mmol), L1, TDG1, solvent (2.0 mL), 100 °C, 12 h. Yields are based on 1a, determined by ¹H-NMR using dibromomethane as an internal standard.^bIsolated yield.^cPd(OAc)₂ (10 mol%).To advance our optimization of the reaction conditions, a variety of 2-pyridones and TDGs were tested (Scheme 2). Originally, pyridine-2(1H)-one (L2) was examined as the external ligand, but it only yielded the product (3a) in 7% NMR yield. Similarly, other mono- and di-substituted 2-pyridone ligands (L3–L10) also produced low yields, fixating L1 as the optimal external ligand. Next, various α- and β-amino acids (TDG1–10) were evaluated, yet TDG1 persisted as the optimal transient directing group. These amino acid screening results also suggest that a [5,6]-bicyclic palladium species is likely the key intermediate in this protocol since only β-amino acids were found to provide appreciable yields, whereas α-amino acids failed to yield more than trace amounts of the product. The supremacy of TDG1 when compared to other β-amino acids is presumably due to the Thorpe–Ingold effect that perhaps helps facilitate the C–H bond cleavage and stabilize the [5,6]-bicyclic intermediate further.Open in a separate windowScheme 2Optimization of 2-pyridone ligands and transient directing groups.With the optimized reaction conditions in hand, substrate scope study of primary aliphatic aldehydes was subsequently carried out (Scheme 3). A variety of linear primary aliphatic aldehydes bearing different chain lengths provided the corresponding products 3a–e in good yields. Notably, relatively sterically hindered methylene C–H bonds were also functionalized effectively (3f and 3g). Additionally, 4-phenylbutanal gave rise to the desired product 3h in a highly site-selective manner, suggesting that functionalization of the methylene β-C–H bond is predominantly favored over the more labile benzylic C–H bond. It is noteworthy that the amide group was also well-tolerated and the desired product 3j was isolated in 60% yield. As expected, with n-propanal as the substrate, β-mono- (3k1) and β,β-disubstituted products (3k2) were isolated in 22% and 21% yields respectively. However, in the absence of the key external 2-pyridone ligand, β-monosubstituted product (3k1) was obtained exclusively, albeit with a low yield, indicating preference for functionalizing the β-C(sp³)–H bond of the methyl group over the benzylic methylene group.Open in a separate windowScheme 3Scope of primary aliphatic aldehydes. Reaction conditions: 1 (0.2 mmol), 2a (0.4 mmol), Pd(OAc)₂ (15 mol%), AgTFA (0.3 mmol), L1 (60 mol%), TDG1 (60 mol%), HFIP (1.8 mL), HOAc (0.2 mL), 100 °C, 12 h. Isolated yields. ^aL1 (60 mol%) was absent and yields are given in parentheses.Next, substrate scope study on aryl iodides was surveyed (Scheme 4). Iodobenzenes bearing either an electron-donating or electron-withdrawing group at the para-, meta-, or ortho-position were all found compatible with our catalytic system (3l–3ah). Surprisingly, ortho-methyl- and fluoro-substituted aryl iodides afforded the products in only trace amounts. However, aryl iodide with ortho-methoxy group provided the desired product 3ac in a moderate yield. Notably, a distinctive electronic effect pattern was not observed in the process. It should be mentioned that arylated products bearing halogen, ester, and cyano groups could be readily converted to other molecules, which significantly improves the synthetic applicability of the process. Delightfully, aryl iodide-containing natural products like ketoprofen, fenchol and menthol were proven compatible, supplying the corresponding products in moderate yields. Unfortunately, (hetero)aryl iodides including 2-iodopyridine, 3-iodopyridine, 4-iodopyridine and 4-iodo-2-chloropyridine failed to produce the corresponding products. Although our protocol provides a novel and direct pathway to construct β-arylated primary aliphatic aldehydes, the yields of most examples are modest. The leading reasons for this compromise are the following: (1) aliphatic aldehydes are easily decomposed or oxidized to acids; (2) some of the prepared β-arylated aldehyde products may be further transformed into the corresponding α,β-unsaturated aldehydes.Open in a separate windowScheme 4Scope of aryl iodides. Reaction conditions: 1a (0.2 mmol), 2 (0.4 mmol), Pd(OAc)₂ (15 mol%), AgTFA (0.3 mmol), L1 (60 mol%), TDG1 (60 mol%), HFIP (1.8 mL), HOAc (0.2 mL), 100 °C, 12 h. Isolated yields.Density functional theory (DFT) calculations were performed to help investigate the reaction mechanism and to elucidate the role of the ligand in improving the reactivity (Fig. 2). The condensation of the aliphatic aldehyde 1a with the TDG to form imine-1a was found thermodynamically neutral (ΔG° = −0.1 kcal mol⁻¹). As a result, it was permissible to use imine-1a directly in the calculations. According to the calculations results, the precatalyst [Pd(OAc)₂]₃, a trimeric complex, initially experiences dissociation and ligand metathesis with imine-1a to generate the Pd(ii) intermediate IM1, which is thermodynamically favorable by 21.9 kcal mol⁻¹. Consequently, the deprotonated imine-1a couples to the bidentate ligand to form the stable six-membered chelate complex IM1. Therefore, IM1 is indeed the catalyst resting state and serves as the zero point to the energy profile. We have identified two competitive pathways for the Pd(ii)-catalyzed C–H activation starting from IM1, one of which incorporates L1 and another which does not. On the one hand, an acetate ligand substitutes one imine-1a chelator in IM1 to facilitate the subsequent C–H activation leading to IM2, which undergoes C(sp³)–H activation through concerted metalation-deprotonation (CMD) viaTS1 (ΔG^‡ = 37.4 kcal mol⁻¹). However, this kinetic barrier is thought to be too high to account for the catalytic activity at 100 °C. On the other hand, the chelate imine-1a could be replaced by two N-coordinated ligands (L1) leading to the Pd(ii) complex IM3. This process is endergonic by 6.4 kcal mol⁻¹. To allow the ensuing C–H activation, IM3 dissociates one ligand (L1) producing the active species IM4, which undergoes TS2 to cleave the β-C(sp³)–H bond and form the [5,6]-bicyclic Pd(ii) intermediate IM5. Although this step features an energy barrier of 31.2 kcal mol⁻¹, it is thought to be feasible under the experimental conditions (100 °C). Possessing similar coordination ability to that of pyridine, the ligand (L1) effectively stabilizes the Pd(ii) center in the C–H activation process, indicating that this step most likely involves a manageable kinetic barrier. This result explicates the origin of the ligand-enabled reactivity (TS2vs.TS1). Additionally, we considered the γ-C(sp³)–H activation pathway viaTS2′ which was found to have a barrier of 35.5 kcal mol⁻¹. The higher energy barrier of TS2′ compared to that of TS2 is attributed to its larger ring strain in the [6,6]-bicyclic Pd(ii) transition state, which reveals the motive for the site-selectivity. Reverting back to the supposed pathway, upon the formation of the bicyclic intermediate IM5, it undergoes ligand/substrate replacement to afford intermediate IM6, at which the Ar–I coordinates to the Pd(ii) center to enable oxidative addition viaTS3 (ΔG^‡ = 27.4 kcal mol⁻¹) leading to the five-coordinate Pd(iv) complex IM7. Undergoing direct C–C reductive elimination in IM7 would entail a barrier of 29.6 kcal mol⁻¹ (TS4). Alternatively, iodine abstraction by the silver(i) salt in IM7 is thermodynamically favorable and irreversible, yielding the Pd(iv) intermediate IM8 coordinated to a TFA ligand. Subsequently, C–C reductive coupling viaTS5 generates the Pd(ii) complex IM9 and concludes the arylation process. This step was found both kinetically facile (6.1 kcal mol⁻¹) and thermodynamically favorable (30.7 kcal mol⁻¹). Finally, IM9 reacts with imine-1avia metathesis to regenerate the palladium catalyst IM1 and release imine-3a in a highly exergonic step (21.0 kcal mol⁻¹). Ultimately, imine-3a undergoes hydrolysis to yield the aldehyde product 3a and to release the TDG.Open in a separate windowFig. 2Free energy profiles for the ligand-promoted Pd(ii)-catalyzed site-selective C–H activation and C–C bond formation, alongside the optimized structures of the C–H activation transition states TS1 and TS2 (selected bond distances are labelled in Å). Energies are relative to the complex IM1 and are mass-balanced.     

Redox-neutral manganese-catalyzed synthesis of 1-pyrrolines

This report describes a manganese-catalyzed radical [3 + 2] cyclization of cyclopropanols and oxime ethers, leading to valuable multi-functional 1-pyrrolines. In this redox-neutral process, the oxime ethers function as internal oxidants and H-donors. The reaction involves sequential rupture of C–C, C–H and N–O bonds and proceeds under mild conditions. This intermolecular protocol provides an efficient approach for the synthesis of structurally diverse 1-pyrrolines.

Described herein is a novel manganese-catalyzed radical [3 + 2] cyclization of cyclopropanols and oxime ethers, leading to valuable multi-functionalized 1-pyrrolines.

Pyrroline and its derivatives appear frequently as the core of the structure of natural products and biologically active molecules (Fig. 1A).¹ Such compounds also serve as versatile feedstocks in various transformations, such as 1,3-dipolar cyclization, ring opening, reduction and oxidation, leading to diverse and valuable compounds.^2–4 Over the past few decades, great effort has been devoted to the preparation of pyrrolines. This has resulted in several elegant approaches that rely on photoredox catalysis (Fig. 1B).⁵ The groups of Studer,^5a,b Leonori,^5c and Loh^5d–f disclosed intramolecular addition of the intermediate iminyl radical to alkenes to construct pyrrolines. Generally, the synthetic value of a method can be further improved by using an intermolecular reaction pattern. For example, Alemán et al. recently reported a radical-polar cascade reaction involving the addition to ketimines of alkyl radicals formed in hydrogen atom transfer (HAT) reactions.^5g That the existence of benzylic C–H bonds in the substrates is requisite for the HAT, compromises the substrate scope. Despite the appealing photochemical processes, development of new redox approaches to enrich the product diversity of pyrrolines, especially with inexpensive transition-metal catalysts, is still in demand.Open in a separate windowFig. 1(A) Importance of pyrrolines, and (B and C) synthetic approaches to pyrrolines.Prompted by extensive applications of cyclopropanols in synthesis⁶ and our achievements in manganese-catalyzed ring-opening reactions,⁷ we conceived a radical [3 + 2] cyclization using cyclopropanol as a C3 synthon and oxime ethers as a nitrogen source (Fig. 1C). Hypothetically, single-electron oxidation of cyclopropanol by Mnⁿ generates the β-keto radical (I), which undergoes a radical [3 + 2] cascade reaction with an oxime ether to give the alkoxy radical species (II). Conversion of II to the intermediate (III), the pyrroline precursor, requires an extra H-donor to support a HAT process and an oxidant for recovery of Mnⁿ to perpetuate the catalytic cycle. In this scenario, the strategic inclusion of oxime ether is crucial to the overall transformation. The oxime ether is not only an internal oxidant and H-donor, but should also be subject to in situ deprotection by cleaving the N–O bond during the reaction. The choice of a proper Mnⁿ/Mnⁿ⁻¹ pair with suitable redox potentials is also vital to the catalytic cycle.Herein, we provide proof-of-principle studies for this hypothesis. The desired radical [3 + 2] cyclization of cyclopropanols and O-benzyl oxime ethers is accomplished with manganese catalysis. This redox-neutral process involves sequential rupture of C–C, C–H, and N–O bonds under mild conditions. The intermolecular protocol provides an ingenious approach to the synthesis of multi-functionalized 1-pyrrolines.With these considerations in mind, phenylcyclopropanol (1a) and oxime ether (2a) were initially chosen as model substrates to evaluate reaction parameters in the presence of manganese salt ( N bond of 2a (entry 2). The optimization of organic solvents was then conducted (entries 3–8), and it was found that the use of fluorinated alcohols, such as trifluoroethanol (TFE) and hexafluoroisopropanol (HFIP) as solvents provided excellent yields (entries 7 and 8). Decreasing the amount of Mn(acac)₃ to 1.2 equiv. gave a comparable yield (entry 9), but further reducing the amount compromised the yield (entry 10). Replacing Mn(acac)₃ with Mn(OAc)₃ or MnCl₂ significantly decreased the reaction yield (entries 11 and 12). However, the use of Mn(acac)₂ gave a similar yield to Mn(acac)₃ (entries 13 vs. 9). The above results prompted us to think over the counteranion effect that the acetylacetone (acac) anion may be requisite to the reaction. Indeed, the synergistic use of stoichiometric MnCl₂ and acetylacetone led to a good yield of the desired product (entry 14). More importantly, a comparable yield was obtained with only 0.2 equiv. of MnCl₂ and added acetylacetone, realizing this reaction under a catalytic amount of Mn salts (entry 15). Given that the low solubility of the Mn salt may lead to poor efficiency, a reaction with 0.067 M concentration was carried out and gave a 89% yield (entry 16). Further reducing the amount of acetylacetone to 1.0 equiv. had no influence on the outcome of the reaction (entry 17), but the reaction efficiency slightly decreased when 0.6 equiv. of acetylacetone was used as the additive (entry 18). Use of a decreased amount (1.0 equiv.) of acetic acid led to the best yield (91%, entry 19), whereas the reaction in the presence of 0.5 equiv. acetic acid (entry 20) or without acetic acid (entry 21) also gave high yields. It is noted that acetic acid is not crucial to the reaction using MnCl₂ as catalyst, as the reaction could generate cat. HCl in situ. The reaction with substoichiometric amount (0.6 equiv.) of acac gave a decreased but also good yield (entry 22). Reducing the catalytic loading of MnCl₂ to 10 mol% slightly compromised the yield (entry 23).Optimization of the synthesis of 1-pyrrolines

Entrya	Mn salt (equiv.)	Additive (equiv.)	Solvent	Yield (%)
1	Mn(acac)3 (1.7)	None	CH3CN	33
2b	Mn(acac)3 (1.7)	None	CH3CN	Trace
3	Mn(acac)3 (1.7)	None	DCM	31
4	Mn(acac)3 (1.7)	None	Acetone	25
5	Mn(acac)3 (1.7)	None	DMSO	Trace
6	Mn(acac)3 (1.7)	None	DMF	Trace
7	Mn(acac)3 (1.7)	None	TFE	80
8	Mn(acac)3 (1.7)	None	HFIP	82
9	Mn(acac)3 (1.2)	None	HFIP	83
10	Mn(acac)3 (0.9)	None	HFIP	55
11	Mn(OAc)3·2H2O (1.2)	None	HFIP	36
12	MnCl2 (1.2)	None	HFIP	Trace
13	Mn(acac)2 (1.2)	None	HFIP	88
14	MnCl2 (1.2)	acac (3.6)	HFIP	80
15	MnCl2 (0.2)	acac (3.6)	HFIP	81
16c	MnCl2 (0.2)	acac (3.6)	HFIP	89
17c	MnCl2 (0.2)	acac (1.0)	HFIP	89
18c	MnCl2 (0.2)	acac (0.6)	HFIP	83
19c,d	MnCl2 (0.2)	acac (1.0)	HFIP	91
20c,e	MnCl2 (0.2)	acac (1.0)	HFIP	83
21c,b	MnCl2 (0.2)	acac (1.0)	HFIP	80
22c,d	MnCl2 (0.2)	acac (0.6)	HFIP	82
23c,d	MnCl2 (0.1)	acac (1.0)	HFIP	81

Open in a separate window^aReaction conditions: 1a (0.45 mmol), 2a (0.3 mmol), AcOH (2.0 equiv.), and Mn salt (as shown) in solvent (2.0 mL), at room temperature (rt) under N₂, for 16 h.^bWithout AcOH.^c0.067 M reaction.^d1.0 equiv. AcOH.^e0.5 equiv. AcOH. acac = acetylacetone.With the optimized conditions in hand for the synthesis of 1-pyrrolines, the compatibility of various cyclopropanols was inspected (Scheme 1). Common functional groups on the phenyl ring, including halides (3b–3d), ester (3f), ether (3j), were compatible under the reaction conditions. Regardless of the presence of electron-withdrawing or -donating substituents at the para-position of this phenyl ring, the reactions readily proceeded with generally high yields (3b–3j). The cyclopropanol (1k) with an ortho-methyl substituent underwent a cyclization reaction with excellent yield, demonstrating that steric effects had little effect on product of the reaction (3k). By replacing the phenyl group with a naphthyl or thienyl group, the corresponding products (3l and 3m) were produced with slightly lower yields. When 2-substituted cyclopropanols were utilized, these reactions gave rise to a portfolio of trisubstituted 1-pyrrolines (3n–3u).The relative configuration of 3u was determined by comparison with a reported structure.⁸ Remarkably, this protocol provided a convenient method for the construction of an N-containing spiro skeleton (3t). The reaction with alkyl cyclopropanols could also furnish the desired products (3v–3x) smoothly and with good yields.Open in a separate windowScheme 1Scope of cyclopropanols. Reaction conditions: 1 (0.3 mmol), 2a (0.2 mmol), AcOH (0.2 mmol), MnCl₂ (0.04 mmol), and acac (0.2 mmol) in HFIP (3.0 mL), at rt under N₂. The d.r. values were determined by ¹H NMR analysis with crude reaction mixture, and major isomers are shown with relative configurations. ^aThe reaction is scaled up for 10 times.Next, we studied the scope of oxime ethers (Scheme 2). Steric hindrance from the ester moiety in the oxime ethers appeared not to influence the reaction outcome. Oxime ethers bearing various esters, such as phenyl (3y), biphenyl (3z and 3ab), 2-naphthyl (3aa), 2,4-di-tert-butylphenyl (3ac and 3ad), and 2,6-dimethylphenyl (3ae) esters all reacted smoothly. In addition, the substrate with tert-butyl ester also readily underwent cyclization to afford the desired product 3af with excellent yield. Remarkably, the trifluoromethyl-substituted pyrroline (3ag) was afforded almost quantitatively from the corresponding ketoxime ether. However, if the trifluoromethyl group was replaced by a methyl or phenyl group, the reaction failed to give rise to the desired product (3ah or 3ai), and this might be attributed to poorer electrophilic nature of the methyl or phenyl substituted substrate.Open in a separate windowScheme 2Scope of oxime ethers. Reaction conditions: 1 (0.3 mmol), 2 (0.2 mmol), AcOH (0.2 mmol), MnCl₂ (0.04 mmol), and acac (0.2 mmol) in HFIP (3.0 mL), at rt under N₂. The d.r. values were determined by ¹H NMR analysis with crude reaction mixture, and major isomers are shown with relative configurations.To illustrate the utility of this protocol, we carried out a set of synthetic applications using 1-pyrroline (3a) (Scheme 3). Upon treatment with acetyl chloride and pyridine at 42 °C, 1-pyrroline (3a) could be readily converted into the acyclic amino acid derivative (4). The reaction between 3a and LiAlH₄ gave rise smoothly to the corresponding alcohol (5). In the presence of 2,3-dichloro-5,6-dicyano-1,4-benzoquin-4-one (DDQ) and triethylamine, the 2,5-disubstituted pyrrole (6) was obtained. Moreover, treatment of 3a with MeOTf and NaBH₄ delivered the N-methyl proline derivative (7).⁹Open in a separate windowScheme 3Synthetic applications. Reaction conditions: (a) AcCl, pyridine, dry DCE, 42 °C, 63% yield; (b) LiAlH₄, THF, reflux, 90% yield; (c) DDQ, Et₃N, DCM, rt, 53% yield; (d) MeOTf, DCM, and then NaBH₄, THF, 40% yield, cis : trans = 6.6 : 1.To probe the mechanistic pathways, we performed a radical trapping experiment in the presence of 2.0 equiv. of radical scavenger TEMPO. The radical trapping product (8) was detected by high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) (Scheme 4A, top). In addition, the reaction was obviously suppressed when 1,1-diphenylethylene was added under standard condition (Scheme 4A, bottom). These results suggested that this process engaged in a radical pathway. Kinetic studies illustrated that the reaction immediately started with 20 mol% Mn(acac)₂ but an approximate 15 min of induction period was appeared by using Mn(acac)₃, which probably indicated that the reaction was initiated with Mn(ii) rather than Mn(iii), and the Mn(ii)/Mn(i) cycle might be involved in the transformation (Scheme 4B, for details see ESI^†).Open in a separate windowScheme 4(A and B) Mechanistic studies, and (C) proposed mechanism.On the basis of these results, a plausible mechanism for this radical process was proposed in Scheme 4C. Initially, the interaction between cyclopropanol (1a) and Mn(ii) salt gives rise to the alkoxy manganese species (I), which undergoes a ligand-to-metal charge transfer (LMCT) process, leading to the alkoxy radical (II).^5f Subsequent ring-opening of the alkoxyl radical (II) provides the alkyl radical (III). The addition of intermediate (III) to the oxime ether, possibly activated by HFIP or HOAc, furnishes the N-centered radical (IV), which intramolecularly attacks the ketone to afford a new alkoxy radical (V).¹⁰ The subsequent 1,5-hydrogen atom transfer (HAT) process delivers the alkyl radical (VI) at the α-position adjacent to the O atom, thus driving N–O bond cleavage to generate the N-centered radical (VII),^5b,11 and benzaldehyde which was detected by TLC. This radical intermediate (VII) undergoes a single electron transfer (SET) mediated by the reduced-state Mn(i) species, and protonation to yield the cyclic pyrrolidine (VIII). Finally, dehydration of this intermediate produces 1-pyrroline (3a).     

Organocatalytic asymmetric formal oxidative coupling for the construction of all-aryl quaternary stereocenters

A new catalytic asymmetric formal cross dehydrogenative coupling process for the construction of all-aryl quaternary stereocenters is disclosed, which provides access to rarely explored chiral tetraarylmethanes with excellent enantioselectivity. The suitable oxidation conditions and the hydrogen-bond-based organocatalysis have enabled efficient intermolecular C–C bond formation in an overwhelmingly crowded environment under mild conditions. para-Quinone methides bearing an ortho-directing group serve as the key intermediate. The precise loading of DDQ is critical to the high enantioselectivity. The chiral products have also been demonstrated as promising antiviral agents.

A one-pot oxidation of racemic triarylmethanes to form para-quinone methides followed by enantioselective construction of all-aryl quaternary stereocenters has been developed.

Cross dehydrogenative coupling (CDC) is a powerful tool to forge intermolecular C–C bonds from two C–H bonds without prefunctionalization.¹ Specifically, the benzylic C–H bond is relatively prone to oxidation and thus it has evolved into a versatile arena for the implementation of this reaction, leading to efficient construction of various benzylic stereogenic centers. As a result, CDC has proved to be useful for the establishment of a wide range of 1,1-diaryl stereocenters (Scheme 1a).² Recently, Liu and coworkers reported a elegant synthesis of enantioenriched triarylacetonitriles via in situ oxidation of α-diarylacetonitriles to para-quinone methides (p-QMs) followed by asymmetric nucleophilic addition with stereocontrol induced by a chiral phosphoric acid catalyst. This represents a rare example of formal CDC for the synthesis of 1,1,1-triarylalkanes (Scheme 1b).³ However, the establishment of tetraaryl-substituted carbon stereocenters by this approach remains unknown (Scheme 1c).Open in a separate windowScheme 1Catalytic asymmetric synthesis of chiral tetraarylmethanes.Distinct from the asymmetric synthesis of triaryl-substituted stereocenters,⁴ substantial steric hindrance in establishing tetraaryl-substituted quaternary stereocenters poses significant synthetic challenges.^5–8 Indeed, even racemic or achiral syntheses of tetraarylmethanes have been an elusive topic of investigation in organic synthesis.⁶ In this context and in continuation of our effort in the studies of asymmetric reactions of para-quinone methides (p-QMs)^9,10 as well as the synthesis of chiral tetraarylmethanes,⁸ we envisioned that suitable oxidation of racemic triarylmethane 1 is expected to generate triarylmethyl cation IM1 (Scheme 1c). With one aryl group as para-hydroxyphenyl, this cation could be stabilized in the form of p-QM IM2. Subsequent asymmetric nucleophilic addition by another electron-rich arene to the p-QM intermediate is expected to generate chiral tetraarylmethanes 2. The challenges associated with this one-pot process mainly include the compatibility problem between the oxidative condition and the catalytic asymmetric system in order to achieve both high efficiency and enantioselectivity.We commenced our study with racemic triarylmethane 1a as the model substrate. The initial study was directed to the search for a suitable oxidant to mildly generate the p-QM intermediate (11 At room temperature, the use of superstoichiometric amounts of Ag₂O or benzoquinone was completely ineffective (entries 1 and 2). Similarly, the reaction did not proceed using oxygen as the oxidant in combination with catalyst Mn(acac)₃ (entry 3). Subsequently, considerable efforts were devoted to screening many other oxidation systems, almost all of which were completely incapable for this oxidation (entries 4–8). However, eventually we were delighted to identify DDQ as the superior oxidant, leading to complete and clean conversion to the desired QM at room temperature (entry 9). In contrast, a combination of catalytic DDQ with 5 equivalents of MnO₂ gave only 60% conversion (entry 10).Evaluation of oxidants

Pd/Cu-Catalyzed amide-enabled selectivity-reversed borocarbonylation of unactivated alkenes

The addition reaction between CuBpin and alkenes to give a terminal boron substituted intermediate is usually fast and facile. In this communication, a selectivity-reversed procedure has been designed and established. This selectivity-reversed borocarbonylation reaction is enabled by a cooperative action between palladium and copper catalysts and proceeds with complete regioselectivity. The key to the success of this transformation is the coordination of the amide group and slower CuBpin formation by using KHCO₃ as the base. A wide range of β-boryl ketones were produced from terminal unactivated aliphatic alkenes and aryl iodides. Further synthetic transformations of the obtained β-boryl ketones have been developed as well.

A selectivity-reversed borocarbonylation reaction has been developed with complete regioselectivity.

The catalytic borocarbonylation of alkenes represents a novel synthetic tool for the simultaneous installation of boron and carbonyl groups across alkenes, enabling rapid construction of molecules with high complexity from abundant alkenes. In particular, the obtained organoboron compounds are versatile synthetic intermediates that can be readily converted into a wide range of functional groups with complete stereospecificity.¹ Consequently, several catalytic systems have been developed to diversify the molecular frameworks through carbonylative borofunctionalization.² In general, carbonylative borofunctionalization of alkenes proceeds via an alkyl-copper intermediate, which was produced by the addition of CuBpin to the terminal position of the alkene starting material,³ followed by CO insertion and other related steps. A new C–B bond is formed at the terminal position of the alkene and a carbonyl group has been installed at the β-position simultaneously (Scheme 1a). However, in contrast to the progress in the borocarbonylation, a selectivity-reversed procedure (the boryl group is installed at the internal position) to give β-boryl ketone products is still unprecedented.Open in a separate windowScheme 1Strategies for borocarbonylation of activated alkenes.Recently, several attractive strategies have emerged for the borofunctionalization of unactivated alkenes to give β-boryl products.^4–7 In 2015, Fu, Xiao and their co-workers established a copper-catalyzed regiodivergent alkylboration of alkenes.^4a In the same year, Miura and Hirano''s group reported a copper-catalyzed aminoboration of terminal alkenes.^4b In these two attractive procedures, the regioselectivity was controlled by the ligand applied. More recently, an intermolecular 1,2-alkylborylation of alkenes was described by Ito''s research group.⁵ A radical-relay strategy was used to achieve the targeted regioselective addition. Furthermore, Engle and co-workers explored a palladium-catalyzed 1,2-carboboration and -silylation reaction of alkenes.⁶ Stereocontrol can be achieved in this new procedure with the assistance of a chiral auxiliary which is a coordinating group in this case.Inspired by these pioneering studies, we assumed that if the reaction could be initiated by the insertion of an acylpalladium complex into alkenes, followed by transmetalation with CuBpin before reductive elimination, β-boryl ketones can finally be produced (Scheme 1b). However, due to the inherent reactivity of the palladium species toward alkenes, olefin substrates were usually restricted to styrenes and a large excess of them is typically required (>6 equivalents).^8,9 Therefore, the critical part of the reaction design is to promote the reaction of the acylpalladium intermediate with alkenes faster than the insertion of CuBpin into olefins. One of the ideas is taking advantage of the coordinating group to transform the reaction from intermolecular to intramolecular. Among the developed directing groups,¹⁰ 8-aminoquinoline (AQ) is interesting and has been relatively well studied by various groups in a number of novel transformations.^11–13 Although the AQ directing group contains a NH group which can participate in intramolecular C–N bond formation,¹⁴ we believe that the selectivity-reversed borocarbonylation of alkenes can potentially be achieved through cooperative Pd/Cu catalysis. Then, valuable β-boryl ketones can be produced from readily available substrates directly and effectively.To test the viability of our design on selectivity-reversed borocarbonylation of alkenes, N-(quinolin-8-yl)pent-4-enamide (1a), iodobenzene (2a), and bis(pinacolato)diboron (B₂pin₂) were chosen as model substrates for systematic studies. As shown in 15 In the testing of palladium precursors, allylpalladium chloride dimer proved to be the best palladium catalyst for this reaction, affording 3a in 41% yield (†) and tend to generate the by-product β-aminoketone. Xantphos was found to be superior to the other tested bidentate ligands ( Entry[Pd]LigandCuBaseYield of 3a (%)1Pd(TFA)₂ L1 IMesCuClK₂CO₃292Pd(OAc)₂ L1 IMesCuClK₂CO₃343[Pd(η³-C₃H₅)Cl]₂ L1 IMesCuClK₂CO₃414[Pd(cinnamyl)Cl]₂ L1 IMesCuClK₂CO₃365[Pd(η³-C₃H₅)Cl]₂ L1 IPrCuClK₂CO₃06[Pd(η³-C₃H₅)Cl]₂ L1 CuClK₂CO₃337[Pd(η³-C₃H₅)Cl]₂ L1 CuBrK₂CO₃418[Pd(η³-C₃H₅)Cl]₂ L1 CuIK₂CO₃509[Pd(η³-C₃H₅)Cl]₂ L2 CuIK₂CO₃3810[Pd(η³-C₃H₅)Cl]₂ L3 CuIK₂CO₃4711[Pd(η³-C₃H₅)Cl]₂ L4 CuIK₂CO₃012[Pd(η³-C₃H₅)Cl]₂ L5 CuIK₂CO₃013[Pd(η³-C₃H₅)Cl]₂ L6 CuIK₂CO₃<214[Pd(η³-C₃H₅)Cl]₂ L7 CuIK₂CO₃1015[Pd(η³-C₃H₅)Cl]₂ L8 CuIK₂CO₃1216[Pd(η³-C₃H₅)Cl]₂ L1 CuIKHCO₃58 (51)^b17[Pd(η³-C₃H₅)Cl]₂ L1 CuIK₂HPO₄2618[Pd(η³-C₃H₅)Cl]₂ L1 CuINaHCO₃019[Pd(η³-C₃H₅)Cl]₂ L1 CuINaO^tBu1120^c[Pd(η³-C₃H₅)Cl]₂ L1 CuIKHCO₃<521[Pd(η³-C₃H₅)Cl]₂ L7 CuIKHCO₃40 Open in a separate window^aAll reactions were carried out on a 0.1 mmol scale with alkene (0.1 mmol) and aryl iodide (2.0 equiv.). Yields were determined by ¹H NMR analysis of the crude reaction mixture using 1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene as the internal standard.^bIsolated yield.^cXantphos (10 mol%).With the optimized reaction conditions in hand, we examined the scope of this selectivity-reversed borocarbonylation with various unactivated alkenes and aryl iodides toward the synthesis of β-boryl ketones ( C bond even when there are two C C bonds in the amide substrates (4i and 4j). In addition, sterically hindered 4-pentenoic amide was subjected to the optimized reaction conditions, and the corresponding product was formed in 42% yield (4k). Furthermore, mono-substitution at the β-position of 4-pentenoic amides could also be employed, affording the corresponding products in moderate yields (4l and 4m). Iodoarenes containing more complex substrates such as L-menthol, L-borneol, vitamin E, diacetonfructose and nerol were also competent substrates and gave moderate to good yields of the corresponding products. Finally, no desired product could be detected when 3-butenoic amide, 2-vinylbenzamide or internal alkene was tested under our standard conditions.Substrate scope for the synthesis of β-boryl ketones^aOpen in a separate window^aAll reactions were carried out on a 0.1 mmol scale. Alkenes (0.1 mmol), aryl iodides (2.0 equiv.), B₂pin₂ (1.5 equiv.), CuI (10 mol%), [Pd(η³-C₃H₅)Cl]₂ (2.5 mol%), xantphos (5 mol%), KHCO₃ (2.0 equiv.), CO (10 bar), and DMSO (0.2 M) were stirred at 70 °C for 18 h. The dr value given was determined by ¹H NMR.To demonstrate the synthetic utilities of the obtained borocarbonylation products, a series of further synthetic transformations of the β-boryl ketones were performed (Scheme 2). From a practical point of view, the reaction can be easily performed on the gram-scale and gave the target product 3m in 67% yield. β-Hydroxyl ketone 6a (CCDC: 2079475;^† determined by X-ray crystallography and the ORTEP drawing with 50% thermal ellipsoids) was produced in 95% yield by oxidation of the parent β-boryl ketone 3a. Furthermore, the C–B bond can be easily converted into a C–N bond, affording β-aminoketone 6b in 60% yield. Upon the reduction reaction of 3m with NaBH₄, the corresponding reduced oxaborole amide 6c could be isolated in 70% yield. Finally, a two-step transamination process was performed to remove the AQ group.¹⁶Open in a separate windowScheme 2Diversification of β-boryl ketones.To gain some insight into the mechanism of this selectivity-reversed borocarbonylation of alkenes, several control experiments were performed. The target product 3a was not formed, instead byproduct 6b was obtained in 40% yield, in the case without xantphos. Possible explanations for this result are: (i) the bidentate directing group AQ increases the stability of Pd(ii) species and promotes the carbonylation step; (ii) the role of xantphos is to coordinate to C(sp³)–Pd(ii) species after its formation and inhibit the formation of the C–N bond to give byproduct 6b (Scheme 3a). In addition, copper and B₂pin₂ were proven to be important, and KHCO₃ was essential for the carbonylation step (Scheme 3b). Analysis of the copper system in the absence of palladium and iodobenzene revealed that alkenes failed to undergo CuBpin insertion under this condition and no hydroboration products could be detected after work-up (Scheme 3c). Additionally, alkenes without the directing group were also tested under our standard conditions, and no reaction occurred.Open in a separate windowScheme 3Control experiments.Although we did not observe compound 7a during our optimization and substrate scope processes, even after stopping the reaction after 8 hours, we tested the possibility that 7a might act as an intermediate. When 7a was subjected to this transformation, the product 3a was delivered in 24% yield and 6b was generated in 37% (Scheme 3d). No significant difference in the yield outcome was observed when xantphos was added. Additionally, in our deuterated substrate testing, the amount of the deuterated product obtained is lower than the theoretical value (Scheme 3e). Thus, a pathway of β-H elimination followed by hydroboration could be involved as well. However, we believe the direct reaction between palladium and copper intermediates is the main one for this procedure due to the proven importance of the AQ group and the known achievements of copper-catalyzed hydroboration of enones, even with enantioselective versions.¹⁷On the basis of the above results and related literature studies,^7,11–14 a possible reaction pathway is proposed (Scheme 4). Initially, the AQ directing group coordinates with Pd⁰, which produces the active AQ-Pd⁰ catalyst I. This is followed by oxidative addition to aryl iodides to generate Pd^II species II, and then by base promoted iodine dissociation to form complex III. After the CO insertion step, the acyl-Pd^II species IV coordinates with the alkene and undergoes migratory insertion to generate C(sp³)–Pd^II intermediate V, which is stabilized by the xantphos ligand and AQ directing group. Subsequently, C(sp³)–Pd^II complex V reacts especially with CuBpin to give the desired product β-boryl ketone and regenerate the Pd(0) complex. Finally, ligand exchange of Pd⁰Ln regenerates AQ-Pd⁰I for the next catalytic cycle. Additionally, another minor pathway that involves the carbonylative Heck reaction to give an enone derivative, followed by its hydroboration to give the final product could be included as well.Open in a separate windowScheme 4Proposed catalytic cycle.In summary, a novel Pd/Cu catalyzed amide-directed selectivity-reversed borocarbonylation for the selective synthesis of β-boryl ketones from terminal alkenes has been developed. Various aryl iodides and aliphatic alkenes were transformed into the desired β-boryl ketones in moderate to excellent yields. In this catalyst system, the assistance from the AQ directing group is essential for successful reaction design.     

Allylic alcohol synthesis by Ni-catalyzed direct and selective coupling of alkynes and methanol

Methanol is an abundant and renewable chemical raw material, but its use as a C1 source in C–C bond coupling reactions still constitutes a big challenge, and the known methods are limited to the use of expensive and noble metal catalysts such as Ru, Rh and Ir. We herein report nickel-catalyzed direct coupling of alkynes and methanol, providing direct access to valuable allylic alcohols in good yields and excellent chemo- and regioselectivity. The approach features a broad substrate scope and high atom-, step- and redox-economy. Moreover, this method was successfully extended to the synthesis of [5,6]-bicyclic hemiacetals through a cascade cyclization reaction of alkynones and methanol.

Methanol is an abundant and renewable chemical raw material, but its use as a C1 source in C–C bond coupling reactions still constitutes a big challenge, and the known methods are limited to the use of expensive and noble metal catalysts such as Ru, Rh and Ir.

To address the sustainability issues in the production of new chemicals, the development of new catalytic processes that are free of by-products and using abundant renewable feedstocks is one of the most important challenges facing chemists today. The simplest alcohol, methanol, is very abundant, with a total annual production capacity of approximately 110 million metric tons per year,¹ and is an important C1-feedstock in the chemical industry. Beller² and Milstein³ made fundamental developments in catalytic dehydrogenation reactions of methanol.⁴ Krische and coworkers pioneered the study of Ir-catalyzed direct C–C coupling of methanol with reactive π-unsaturated reactants (1,3-dienes, 1,3-enynes and allenes).⁵ The groups of Glorius,⁶ Donohoe,⁷ Obora,⁸ Andersson⁹ and others¹⁰ demonstrated the direct methylation of ketones or amines using methanol. Despite these achievements, the catalytic C–C bond coupling reactions with methanol are still extremely rare and are limited to the use of precious and noble metal-catalysts such as Ru, Rh or Ir.¹¹ The development and use of cheap and abundant metal catalysts for methanol activation is uphill and remains an important field that urgently needs to be developed.On the other hand, allylic alcohols are highly versatile building blocks in organic synthesis and the pharmaceutical industry, and much effort has been devoted to their synthesis. Among them, nickel-catalyzed reductive coupling of alkynes and aldehydes represents an effective and powerful method. However, this method generally requires the use of stoichiometric reducing reagents that are air-sensitive, metallic or pyrophoric (e.g. ZnR₂, BEt₃, and R₃SiH, Scheme 1a).¹² The direct cross-coupling of alcohols and alkynes to synthesize allylic alcohols without the use of any reductant or oxidant represents a significant advancement (Scheme 1b).¹³ However, this approach still poses many limitations that will require considerable effort to overcome. (1) Alkynes are limited to dialkyl alkynes, and poor regioselectivities were observed for unsymmetrical alkynes, which greatly limits the scope of application of the reaction. (2) Alcohols are restricted to active benzyl alcohols and higher alcohols. The direct cross-coupling of alkynes with methanol has not yet been reported.Open in a separate windowScheme 1Synthesis of allylic alcohols by Ni-catalyzed coupling reaction with alkynes.Although the alkyne–paraformaldehyde reductive coupling has been developed,¹⁴ the paraformaldehyde was itself prepared from synthesis gas (through methanol). Therefore, the development of a new strategy for the direct coupling of alkynes and methanol without the use of any reductant or oxidant is still of great value, but also extremely challenging: (1) alkynes are reactive and could rapidly dimerize to 1,3-dienes¹⁵ or cyclotrimerize to aromatic ring derivatives in the interaction with nickel.¹⁶ (2) Unsymmetric alkynes could result in a mixture of regioisomers that are difficult to separate. (3) The activation energy of methanol in the dehydrogenation process (ΔH = +84 kJ mol⁻¹) is significantly higher than that of higher alcohols or even ethanol (ΔH = +68 kJ mol⁻¹).¹⁷Herein we report the nickel-catalyzed direct and regioselective hydrohydroxymethylation of alkynes for the first time using methanol as a C1-feedstock, providing a broad and efficient approach for the synthesis of high added-value allylic alcohols in a high atom-, step- and redox-economic manner. In addition, a cascade cyclization reaction of alkynones and methanol has also been developed for the synthesis of [5,6]-bicyclic hemiacetals in good yields and excellent regio- and diastereoselectivity (Scheme 1c).In our initial experiments, we chose unsymmetrical internal alkyne 1a as a model substrate to optimize the reaction conditions (13a Even if the reaction temperature was increased to 100 °C, only a trace amount of allylic alcohol product 2a was observed (entry 2), which indicates that the use of methanol in the catalytic C–C coupling reactions is indeed a big challenge. Various N-heterocyclic carbene ligands (L2–L6) were investigated (entries 3–9). We found that the selectivity of allylic alcohol 2a is challenged by a number of side reactions, such as the hydrogenation (3a), dimerization (4a) and trimerization (5a) of alkyne 1a. L4 is the most effective, providing 2a with the highest yield (40%) and excellent regioselectivity (14/1), but an appreciable quantity of dimerization and trimerization by-products 4a and 5a was still obtained (entry 5). Krische¹⁴ reported that PCy₃ could promote the reductive coupling of alkynes and paraformaldehyde, but we found that it is not effective for alkyne–methanol coupling (entry 8).Optimization of reaction conditions^a

Hypervalent iodine-mediated β-difluoroalkylboron synthesis via an unusual 1,2-hydrogen shift enabled by boron substitution

β-Difluoroalkylborons, featuring functionally important CF₂ moiety and synthetically valuable boron group, have great synthetic potential while remaining synthetically challenging. Herein we report a hypervalent iodine-mediated oxidative gem-difluorination strategy to realize the construction of gem-difluorinated alkylborons via an unusual 1,2-hydrogen migration event, in which the (N-methyliminodiacetyl) boronate (BMIDA) motif is responsible for the high regio- and chemoselectivity. The protocol provides facile access to a broad range of β-difluoroalkylborons under rather mild conditions. The value of these products was demonstrated by further transformations of the boryl group into other valuable functional groups, providing a wide range of difluorine-containing molecules.

A hypervalent iodine-mediated gem-difluorination allows the facile synthesis of β-difluoroalkylborons. An unusual 1,2-hydrogen migration, triggered by boron substitution, is involved.

Organofluorine compounds have been widely applied in medicinal chemistry and materials science.^1a–d In particular, the gem-difluoro moiety featuring unique steric and electronic properties can act as a chemically inert isostere of a variety of polar functional groups.^2a–c Therefore, the construction of gem-difluoro-containing compounds has received considerable attention in recent years. Efficient methods including deoxyfluorination of carbonyl compounds,^3a,b photoredox difluorination,⁴ radical difluorination,⁵ and cross-coupling reactions with suitable CF₂ carriers^6a–f are well developed. Alternatively, iodoarene-mediated oxidative difluorination reactions provide valuable access to these motifs by using simple alkenes as starting materials.^7a–i Previously, these reactions were generally associated with a 1,2-aryl or 1,2-alkyl migration (Scheme 1a).^7a–f Recent developments also allowed the use of heteroatoms as migrating groups, thereby furnishing gem-difluoro compounds equipped with easily transformable functional groups (Scheme 1b). In this regard, Bi and coworkers reported an elegant 1,2-azide migrative gem-difluorination of α-vinyl azides, enabling the synthesis of a broad range of novel β-difluorinated alkyl azides.^7g Jacobsen developed an iodoarene-catalyzed synthesis of gem-difluorinated aliphatic bromides featuring 1,2-bromo migration with high enantioselectivity.^7h Almost at the same time, research work from our group demonstrated that not only bromo, but also chloro and iodo could serve as viable migrating groups.⁷ⁱOpen in a separate windowScheme 1Hypervalent iodine-mediated β-difluoroalkylboron synthesis.We have been devoted to developing new methodologies for the assembly of boron-containing building blocks by using easily accessible and stable MIDA (N-methyliminodiacetyl) boronates^8a–c as starting materials.^9a–e Recently, we realized a hypervalent iodine-mediated oxidative difluorination of aryl-substituted alkenyl MIDA boronates.^9d Depending on the substitution patterns, the reaction could lead to the synthesis of either α- or β-difluoroalkylborons via 1,2-aryl migration (Scheme 1c). Recently, with alkyl-substituted branched alkenyl MIDA boronates, Szabó and Himo observed an interesting bora-Wagner–Meerwein rearrangement, furnishing β-difluorinated alkylboronates with broader product diversity (Scheme 1d).¹⁰ While extending the scope of our previous work,^9d we found that the use of linear alkyl-substituted alkenyl MIDA boronates also delivers β-difluoroalkylboron products. Intriguingly, instead of an alkyl- or boryl-migration, an unusual 1,2-hydrogen shift takes place. It should be noted that internal inactivated alkenes typically deliver the 1,2-difluorinated products, with no rearrangement taking place.^11a–d Herein, we disclose our detailed study of our second generation of β-difluoroalkylborons synthesis (Scheme 1e). The starting linear 1,2-disubstituted alkyl-substituted alkenyl MIDA boronates, unlike the branched ones,¹⁰ could be readily prepared via a two-step sequence consisting of hydroborylation of the terminal alkyne and a subsequent ligand exchange with N-methyliminodiacetic acid. This intriguing 1,2-H shift was found to be closely related to the boron substitution, probably driven thermodynamically by the formation of the β-carbon cation stabilized by a σ(C–B) bond via hyperconjugation.^12a–dTo start, we employed benzyl-substituted alkenyl MIDA boronate 1a as a model substrate (9d the use of F sources such as CsF, AgF and Et₃N·HF in association with PhI(OAc)₂ (PIDA) as the oxidant and DCM as the solvent led to no reaction (entries 1 to 3). The use of Py·HF (20 equiv) successfully provided β-difluorinated alkylboronate 2a, derived from an unusual 1,2-hydrogen migration, in 39% yield (entry 4). By simply increasing the loading of Py·HF to 40 equivalents, a higher conversion and thus an improved yield of 61% was obtained (entry 5). No further improvement was observed by using a large excess of Py·HF (100 equiv) (entry 6). Other hypervalent iodine oxidants such as PhIO or PIFA were also effective but resulted in reduced yields (entries 7 and 8). A brief survey of other solvents revealed that the original DCM was the optimal one (entries 9 and 10).Optimization of reaction conditions

Three-component 1,2-carboamination of vinyl boronic esters via amidyl radical induced 1,2-migration

Three-component 1,2-carboamination of vinyl boronic esters with alkyl/aryl lithium reagents and N-chloro-carbamates/carboxamides is presented. Vinylboron ate complexes generated in situ from the boronic ester and an organo lithium reagent are shown to react with readily available N-chloro-carbamates/carboxamides to give valuable 1,2-aminoboronic esters. These cascades proceed in the absence of any catalyst upon simple visible light irradiation. Amidyl radicals add to the vinylboron ate complexes followed by oxidation and 1,2-alkyl/aryl migration from boron to carbon to give the corresponding carboamination products. These practical cascades show high functional group tolerance and accordingly exhibit broad substrate scope. Gram-scale reaction and diverse follow-up transformations convincingly demonstrate the synthetic potential of this method.

Three-component 1,2-carboamination of vinyl boronic esters with alkyl/aryl lithium reagents and N-chloro-carbamates/carboxamides is presented.

Alkenes are important and versatile building blocks in organic synthesis. 1,2-Difunctionalization of alkenes offers a highly valuable synthetic strategy to access 1,2-difunctionalized alkanes by sequentially forming two vicinal σ-bonds.^1a–h Among these vicinal difunctionalizations, the 1,2-carboamination of alkenes, in which a C–N and a C–C bond are formed, provides an attractive route for the straightforward preparation of structurally diverse amine derivatives (Scheme 1a).^2a–c Along these lines, transition-metal-catalyzed or radical 1,2-carboaminations of activated and unactivated alkenes have been reported.^3a–p However, the 1,2-carboamination of vinylboron reagents, a privileged class of olefins,^4a–h to form valuable 1,2-aminoboron compounds which can be readily used in diverse downstream functionalizations,^{5a–c,6a–d} has been rarely investigated. To the best of our knowledge, there are only two reported examples, as shown in Schemes 1b and c. In 2013, Molander disclosed a Rh-catalyzed 1,2-aminoarylation of potassium vinyltrifluoroborate with benzhydroxamates via C–H activation (Scheme 1b).⁷ Thus, the 1,2-carboamination of vinylboron reagents is still underexplored but highly desirable.Open in a separate windowScheme 1Intermolecular 1,2-carboamination of alkenes.1,2-Alkyl/aryl migrations induced by β-addition to vinylboron ate complexes have been shown to be highly reliable for 1,2-difunctionalization of vinylboron reagents (Scheme 1c).^4d–h In 1967, Zweifel''s group developed 1,2-alkyl/aryl migrations of vinylboron ate complexes induced by an electrophilic halogenation.⁸ In 2016, the Morken group reported the electrophilic palladation-induced 1,2-alkyl/aryl migration of vinylboron ate complexes.^9a–k Shortly thereafter, we,^10a–c Aggarwal,^11a–c and Renaud¹² developed alkyl radical induced 1,2-alkyl/aryl migrations of vinylboron ate complexes. In these recent examples, the migration is induced by a C-based radical/electrophile, halogen and chalcogen electrophiles.^13a,bIn contrast, N-reagent-induced migration of vinylboron ate complexes proceeding via β-amination is not well investigated. To our knowledge, as the only example the Aggarwal laboratory described the reaction of a vinylboron ate complex with an aryldiazonium salt as the electrophile, but the desired β-aminated rearrangement product was formed in only 9% NMR yield (Scheme 1c).^13a No doubt, β-amino alkylboronic esters would be valuable intermediates in organic synthesis. Encouraged by our continuous work on amidyl radicals^14a–i and 1,2-migrations of boron ate complexes,^{10a–c,15a–f} we therefore decided to study the amidyl radical-induced carboamination of vinyl boronic esters for the preparation of 1,2-aminoboronic esters. N-chloroamides were chosen as N-radical precursors,^16a–c as these N-chloro compounds can be easily prepared from the corresponding N–H analogues.¹⁷ Herein, we present a catalyst-free three-component 1,2-carboamination of vinyl boronic esters with N-chloroamides and readily available alkyl/aryl lithium reagents (Scheme 1d).We commenced our study by exploring the reaction of the vinylboron ate complex 2a with tert-butyl chloro(methyl)carbamate 3a applying photoredox catalysis. Complex 2a was generated in situ by addition of n-butyllithium to the boronic ester 1a in diethyl ether at 0 °C. After solvent removal, the photocatalyst fac-Ir(ppy)₃ (1 mol%) and THF were added followed by the addition of 3a. Upon blue LED light irradiation, the mixture was stirred at room temperature for 16 hours. To our delight, the desired 1,2-aminoboronic ester 4a was obtained, albeit with low yield (26%, EntryPhotocatalystSolventT (°C)Yield^b (%)1 fac-Ir(ppy)₃THFrt262 fac-Ir(ppy)₃DMSOrt23 fac-Ir(ppy)₃MeCNrt564Ru(bpy)₃Cl₂·6H₂OMeCNrt695Na₂Eosin YMeCNrt696^cNa₂Eosin YMeCNrt707^cNoneMeCNrt458^cNoneMeCN0789^cNoneMeCN−2088 (85)10^c,dNoneMeCN−202Open in a separate window^aReaction conditions: 1a (0.20 mmol), ⁿBuLi (0.22 mmol), in Et₂O (2 mL), 0 °C to rt, 1 h, under Ar. After vinylboron ate complex formation, solvent exchange to the selected solvent (2 mL) was performed.^bGC yield using n-C₁₄H₃₀ as an internal standard; yield of isolated product is given in parentheses.^c4 mL MeCN was used.^dReaction carried out in the dark.With optimal conditions in hand, we then investigated the scope of this new 1,2-carboamination protocol keeping 2a as the N-radical acceptor (Scheme 2). This transformation turned out to be compatible with various primary amine reaction partners bearing carbamate (4a, 4b and 4d–4g) or acyl protecting groups (4c) (20–85%). Notably, N-chlorolactams can be used as N-radical precursors, as shown by the successful preparation of 4h (71%). Moreover, Boc-protected ammonia was also tolerated, delivering 4i in an acceptable yield (55%).Open in a separate windowScheme 21,2-Carboamination of 1a with various amidyl radical precursors. Reaction conditions: 1a (0.20 mmol, 1.0 equiv.), ⁿBuLi (0.22 mmol, 1.1 equiv.), in Et₂O (2 mL), 0 °C to rt, 1 h, under Ar; then [N]-Cl (0.24 mmol, 1.2 equiv.), −20 °C, 16 h, in MeCN (4 mL). Yields given correspond to yields of isolated products. ^aA solution of [N]-Cl (0.30 mmol, 1.5 equiv.) in MeCN (1 mL) was used. See the ESI^† for experimental details.We continued the studies by testing a range of vinylboron ate complexes (Scheme 3). To this end, various vinylboron ate complexes were generated by reacting the vinyl boronic ester 1a with methyllithium, n-hexyllithium, isopropyllithium and tert-butyllithium. For the n-alkyl-substituted vinylboron ate complexes, the 1,2-carboamination worked smoothly to afford 4j and 4k in good yields. However, the vinylboron ate complex derived from isopropyllithium addition provided the desired products in much lower yield (4l, 18% yield). When tert-butyllithium was employed, only a trace of the targeted product was detected (see ESI^†). As expected, cascades comprising a 1,2-aryl migration from boron to carbon worked well. Thus, by using PhLi for vinylboron ate complex formation, the 1,2-aminoboronic esters 4m–4o were obtained in 69–73% yields with the Boc (t-BuOCONClMe), ethoxycarbonyl-(EtOCONClMe) and methoxycarbonyl (Moc)-(MeOCONClMe) protected N-chloromethylamines (for the structures of 3, see ESI^†) as radical amination reagents. Keeping 3b as the N-donor, other aryllithiums bearing various functional groups at the para position of the aryl moiety, such as methoxy (4p), trimethylsilyl (4q), methyl (4r), phenyl (4s), trifluoromethoxy (4t), trifluoromethyl (4u), and halides (4v–4x) all reacted well in this transformation. Aryl groups bearing meta substituents are also tolerated, as documented by the preparation of 4y (81%). To our delight, a boron ate complex generated with a 3-pyridyl lithium reagent engaged in the cascade and the carboamination product 4z was isolated in high yield (82%).Open in a separate windowScheme 3Scope of vinylboron ate complexes. Reaction conditions: 1 (0.20 mmol, 1.0 equiv.), R_MLi (0.22 mmol, 1.1 or 1.3 equiv.), Et₂O or THF, under Ar; then [N]-Cl (0.30 mmol, 1.5 equiv.), −20 °C, 16 h, in MeCN. Yields given correspond to yields for isolated products. See the ESI^† for experimental details.The reason for the dramatic reduction in yield when α-branched alkyllithium or electron-rich aryllithium reagents were used might be that the corresponding vinylboron ate complexes could be oxidized by N-chloroamides via a single-electron oxidation process.^18a–e Furthermore, the α-unsubstituted vinyl boronic ester and vinyl boronic ester bearing various α-substituents are suitable N-radical acceptors and the corresponding products 4aa–4ac were obtained in 48–70% yield.To gain insights into the mechanism of this 1,2-carboamination, a control experiment was conducted. The reaction could be nearly fully suppressed when the reaction was carried out in the presence of a typical radical scavenger (2,2-6,6-tetramethyl piperidine-N-oxyl, TEMPO), indicating a radical mechanism (Scheme 4a). Further, considering an ionic process, the N-chloroamides would react as Cl⁺-donors that would lead to Zweifel-type products, which were not observed under the applied conditions. The proposed mechanism is shown in Scheme 4b. As chloroamides have been recently proposed to undergo homolysis under visible light irradiation,^19a,b we propose that initiation proceeds via homolytic N–Cl cleavage generating the electrophilic amidyl radical A, which then adds to the electron-rich vinylboron ate complex 2a to give the adduct boronate radical B. The radical anion B then undergoes single electron transfer (SET) oxidation with 3a in an electron-catalyzed process^20a,b or chloride atom transfer with 3a to provide C or D along with the amidyl radical A, thereby sustaining the radical chain. Intermediates C or D can then react via a boronate 1,2-migration^10c,11c,21 to eventually give the isolated product 4a.Open in a separate windowScheme 4Control experiment and proposed mechanism.To document the synthetic utility of the method, a larger-scale reaction and various follow-up transformations were conducted. Gram-scale reaction of 2a with 3a afforded the desired product 4a in good yield, demonstrating the practicality of this transformation (Scheme 5a). Oxidation of 4a with NaBO₃ provided the β-amino alcohol 5 in 89% yield (Scheme 5b). The N-Boc homoallylic amine 6 was obtained by Zweifel-olefination with a commercially available vinyl Grignard reagent and elemental iodine in good yield (79%).²² Heteroarylation of the C–B bond in 4a was realized by oxidative coupling of 4a with 2-thienyl lithium to provide 7.²³Open in a separate windowScheme 5Gram-scale reaction and follow-up chemistry.In summary, we have described an efficient method for the preparation of 1,2-aminoboronic esters from vinyl boronic esters via catalyst-free three-component radical 1,2-carboamination. Readily available N-chloro-carbamates/carboxamides, which are used as the N-radical precursors, react efficiently with in situ generated vinylboron ate complexes to afford the corresponding valuable 1,2-aminoboronic esters in good yields. The reaction features broad substrate scope and high functional group tolerance. The value of the introduced method was documented by Gram-scale reaction and successful follow-up transformations.     

Oxindole synthesis via polar–radical crossover of ketene-derived amide enolates in a formal [3 + 2] cycloaddition

Herein we introduce a simple, efficient and transition-metal free method for the preparation of valuable and sterically hindered 3,3-disubstituted oxindoles via polar–radical crossover of ketene derived amide enolates. Various easily accessible N-alkyl and N-arylanilines are added to disubstituted ketenes and the resulting amide enolates undergo upon single electron transfer oxidation a homolytic aromatic substitution (HAS) to provide 3,3-disubstituted oxindoles in good to excellent yields. A variety of substituted anilines and a 3-amino pyridine engage in this oxidative formal [3 + 2] cycloaddition and cyclic ketenes provide spirooxindoles. Both substrates and reagents are readily available and tolerance to functional groups is broad.

Herein we introduce a simple, efficient and transition-metal free method for the preparation of valuable and sterically hindered 3,3-disubstituted oxindoles via polar–radical crossover of ketene derived amide enolates.

Oxindoles, in particular the 3,3-disubstituted congeners, are highly valuable substructures in medicinal chemistry. The oxindole core can be found in various biologically active compounds, that are for example used in the treatment of cancer or as antibacterial agents.¹ In addition, the oxindole moiety also occurs in several complex natural products.² The first oxindole synthesis was reported by Baeyer and Knop in 1866.³ That time, isatin was converted by sodium amalgam reduction to the corresponding oxindole. Since then, many methods for the preparation of 3,3-disubstituted oxindoles have been developed that proceed via functionalization of a pre-existing oxindole core.⁴ In addition, methods for the construction of 3,3-disubstituted oxindoles starting from acyclic precursors have also been introduced.^5,6 Along these lines, transition metal-mediated reactions^5,7 or homolytic aromatic substitutions (HAS)^8–14 have found to be highly efficient for the construction of the oxindole core. Focusing on the latter approach, the intramolecular HAS proceeds via α-carbonyl radicals derived from radical addition to N-arylacrylamides,⁸ reduction of α-haloarylamides⁹ or oxidation of the corresponding enolates^10–14 (Scheme 1a).Open in a separate windowScheme 1Selected strategies for the synthesis of oxindoles.In 2017, the group of Taylor developed a transition metal-free enolate oxidation-HAS-approach towards oxindoles at low temperature using elemental iodine as the oxidant and malonic acid derived N-aryl amides as substrates which are readily deprotonated.¹⁴The unique reactivity of ketenes¹⁵ has been explored extensively,¹⁶ especially in [2 + 2]-cycloadditions.¹⁷ Moreover, Staudinger,¹⁸ Lippman¹⁹ and Taylor²⁰ showed that ketenes react with aryl nitrones in a tandem [3 + 2]-cycloaddition-[3,3]-sigmatropic-rearrangement cascade²¹ followed by hydrolysis to provide oxindoles (Scheme 1b). The use of chiral nitrones leads to chirality transfer and enantiomerically enriched oxindoles can be obtained via this approach.^21,22 In contrast to the examples discussed in Scheme 1a, two σ-bonds are formed and the overall sequence can be regarded as a formal [3 + 2] cycloaddition. Despite good yields and high enantiomeric excess, nitrones have to be used as precursors and an aldehyde is formed as the byproduct diminishing reaction economy of these elegant cascades.To address these drawbacks, we decided to use the nucleophilic addition^23–26 of deprotonated anilines to ketenes for the generation of the corresponding amide enolates that should then be oxidized in a single electron transfer process to α-amide radicals which can undergo a homolytic aromatic substitution providing direct access to sterically challenging 3,3-disubstituted oxindoles in a straightforward one-pot sequence (Scheme 1c). This polar–radical crossover reaction shows high atom economy and as the reaction with the nitrones can also be regarded as a formal [3 + 2] cycloaddition.We initiated the optimization study with N-methylaniline 1a and ethyl phenyl ketene 2a, which was prepared in an easy and scalable one-pot protocol starting from the corresponding carboxylic acid, as model substrates. Deprotonation of 1a with n-BuLi in THF and subsequent addition to the ketene 2a led to desired Li-enolate which was confirmed by protonation with water and isolation of the amide 4aa (56%). Pleasingly, addition of ferrocenium hexafluorophosphate (FcPF₆, 2.2 equiv.) at room temperature to the Li-enolate afforded the desired oxindole 3aa in 29% yield (14 Light does not appear to play a crucial role in this transformation, as performing the reaction in the dark does not have a significant effect on the reaction outcome ( EntryBaseConc. (M)Oxidant (equiv.)Yield 3aa (%)^b1 n-BuLi0.1FcPF₆ (2.2)29 (18)^c2^d n-BuLi0.1CuCl₂ (2.2)34^c3 n-BuLi0.1I₂ (2.2)41^c4EtMgBr0.1I₂ (2.2)44^c5EtMgBr0.02I₂ (2.2)78 6 EtMgBr 0.01 I ₂ (2.2) 90 (82) ^c 7EtMgBr0.01I₂ (1.2)258EtMgBr0.01NIS^e (2.2)399EtMgBr0.01I₂ (1.2)^f8010EtMgBr0.01I₂ (2.2)^g8211EtMgBr0.01I₂ (2.2)^h7412EtMgBr0.01I₂ (2.2)ⁱ93Open in a separate window^aReactions (0.20 mmol) were conducted under argon atmosphere.^{b 1}H NMR yield using 1,3,5-trimethoxybenzene as internal standard.^cIsolated yield.^dStep 1 and 2 were conducted at 0 °C.^e N-Iodosuccinimide.^fIodine addition at −78 °C, then slowly allowed to warm to room temperature.^14gIn the dark.^hIrradiation with blue LED (40 W, 467 nm, rt, 8 h).ⁱRefluxing THF for step 3, reaction completed within 2 h.With the optimized reaction conditions in hand, we investigated the scope by first varying the R¹-substituent at the N-atom using the ketene 2a as the reaction partner (Scheme 2). In general, increasing the steric bulk at the nitrogen leads to diminished yields of the targeted oxindoles. The lower yields go along with the formation of a larger amount of the corresponding α,β-unsaturated amide side product 5. Thus, as compared to the parent N-methyl derivative, all other N-alkyl derivatives were formed in lower yields (49%, 3ab; 35%, 3ac; 49%, 3ad). The N-benzyl protected oxindole 3af and the N-phenyl oxindole 3ae were isolated in 54% and 56% yield, respectively. Next, a diastereoselective oxindole synthesis was attempted using chiral anilines 1g and 1h. Surprisingly, despite the bulkiness of these nucleophiles containing styryl-type N-substituents, good yields were obtained for the oxindoles 3ag and 3ah (73–79%). Unfortunately, diastereocontrol was low in both cases (1.9 : 1 d.r. and 1.5 : 1 d.r.). Of note, addition of Mg-1g and Mg-1h to ketene 2a was rather slow under the standard reaction condition and a significant amount of unreacted aniline was recovered. That problem could be solved by prolonging the reaction time of both step 1 (deprotonation) and also step 2 (Mg-enolate formation).Open in a separate windowScheme 2Substrate scope – variation of substituents at the nitrogen. Reactions (0.20 mmol) were conducted under argon atmosphere. ^a For step 1 and 2 reaction time was 1 h.Next, the substrate scope was investigated by using different anilines in combination with the ketene 2a (Scheme 3). N-Methyl-p-toluidine 1i and N-methyl-p-haloanilines 1j–m could be successfully transformed to the corresponding oxindoles 3al–am in moderate to good yields (53–87%). Electron-withdrawing and also electron-donating substituents are tolerated and oxindoles derived from p-cyano- (3an, 92%), p-acetyl- (3ao, 30%), p-methoxycarbonyl- (3ap, 82%) and p-methoxy- (3aq, 71%) anilines were isolated in moderate to excellent yields documenting a high functional group tolerance of this reaction. The meta-methyl aniline afforded oxindole 3ar in 76% yield as a 1.8 : 1 mixture of the two regioisomers (only the major isomer drawn). For the pyridyl derivative 3as, a lower yield was obtained (39%), but reaction occurred with complete regiocontrol. Of note, ortho-methyl N-methylaniline provided the corresponding oxindole only in trace amounts (not shown).Open in a separate windowScheme 3Substrate Scope – variation of anilines and ketenes. Reactions (0.20 mmol) were conducted under argon atmosphere. ^a Isolated as an inseparable mixture (1 : 1.4) with the protonated enolate 4fa (56% combined yield).The ketene component was also varied using N-methylaniline 1a as the reaction partner. The transformation of methyl phenyl ketene 2b provided the oxindole 3ba in 58% yield. p-Bromophenyl ethyl ketene 2c and p-iodophenyl ethyl ketene 2d afforded the oxindoles 3ca and 3da in good yields (70% and 76%). For the ibuprofene-derived ketene 2e a lower yield was obtained (3ea, 40%) and the bulkier phenyl isopropyl congener 3fa was isolated in 27% yield as an inseparable mixture with the protonated enolate 4fa (56% combined yield). In the latter case, increasing the reaction time did neither lead to a higher yield of 3fa nor to a suppression of the formation of 4fa. The lower yield is likely caused by steric effects. Surprisingly, diphenyl ketene 2g delivered the targeted oxindole 3ga in acceptable 55% yield despite the steric demand of the two phenyl groups and the high stability of the corresponding α-amide radical. Spirocyclic oxindoles are of great interest due to their high pharmaceutical potential.²⁷ We were pleased to find that our method also works for the preparation of such spiro compounds as documented by the successful synthesis of 3ha (26%).Mechanistically, we propose initial formation of the enolate A by nucleophilic attack of the deprotonated aniline to the ketene 2, which is then oxidized by elemental iodine to the α-amide radical B (pathway b). The radical nature of the transformation is supported by the fact that electronic effects on the arene show no influence on the efficiency of the cyclization, as would be shown by a conceivable polar aromatic substitution. Radical B readily cyclizes onto the aniline ring to generate the cyclohexadienyl radical D which is oxidatively rearomatized via cationic intermediate E to finally give the oxindole 3 (Scheme 4).^10–14 Alternatively, enolate A can be iodinated with I₂ to give the unstable iodide C which then undergoes C–I bond homolysis to generate the radical B (pathway a). Indeed, Taylor and coworkers¹⁴ observed under similar reaction conditions the decay of α-iodinated compounds of type Cvia C–I homolysis^14,28 to give radicals of type B. Usually, we observed α,β-unsaturated amides analogous to 5aa as by-products. However, the corresponding protonated enolates were detected only in tiny amounts in most of these cases. This strongly suggests that those amides are not formed via disproportionation of radical B. HI-elimination seems more likely, pointing towards the presence of the iodinated species C and thus the contribution of pathway b to product formation. In addition, dimerization of radical B was also not observed.Open in a separate windowScheme 4Suggested mechanism.To further support pathway b, isolation of the iodinated intermediate C was attempted at low temperature. Upon addition of iodine (1.2 equiv.) to the preformed Mg-enolate A derived from aniline 1a and ketene 2a at −78 °C,¹⁴ TLC analysis showed a clean conversion to a single new compound, which was analyzed by rapid ESI-MS analysis and provided evidence for the formation of the iodinated intermediate C (Scheme 5). However, isolation of this highly unstable compound was not possible due to rapid HI-elimination to the amide 5aa. Note that oxindole formation worked well upon I₂-addition at −78 °C and subsequent warming to room temperature (see Scheme 5). This is consistent with the observation from our optimization studies that irradiation with blue light does not contribute to the yield of oxindole 3aa (Open in a separate windowScheme 5Mechanistic experiments. (a) (1) EtMgBr (1.1 equiv.), rt, 30 min, (2) 2a (1.5 equiv.), −78 °C, 30 min, (3) I₂ (1.2 equiv.), −78 °C, 15 min in THF (0.01 M). (b) Warm to room temperature in THF (0.01 M), 18 h. (c) NaI (1.2 equiv.) in acetone (0.77 M), rt, 18 h. (d) Irradiation with blue LED (40 W, 467 nm) in THF (0.01 M), rt, 8 h.     

Organocatalytic discrimination of non-directing aryl and heteroaryl groups: enantioselective synthesis of bioactive indole-containing triarylmethanes

Despite the enormous developments in asymmetric catalysis, the basis for asymmetric induction is largely limited to the spatial interaction between the substrate and catalyst. Consequently, asymmetric discrimination between two sterically similar groups remains a challenge. This is particularly formidable for enantiodifferentiation between two aryl groups without a directing group or electronic manipulation. Here we address this challenge by using a robust organocatalytic system leading to excellent enantioselection between aryl and heteroaryl groups. With versatile 2-indole imine methide as the platform, an excellent combination of a superb chiral phosphoric acid and the optimal hydride source provided efficient access to a range of highly enantioenriched indole-containing triarylmethanes. Control experiments and kinetic studies provided important insights into the mechanism. DFT calculations also indicated that while hydrogen bonding is important for activation, the key interaction for discrimination of the two aryl groups is mainly π–π stacking. Preliminary biological studies also demonstrated the great potential of these triarylmethanes for anticancer and antiviral drug development.

Excellent enantiodiscrimination between aryl and heteroaryl groups without a directing group has been achieved with organocatalysis. The highly enantioenriched triarylmethane products exhibit anticancer and antiviral activities.

Asymmetric catalysis has evolved arguably into the most powerful method for the synthesis of enantioenriched molecules.¹ It features high efficiency and atom-economy in principle as compared to other approaches such as chiral resolution and auxiliary-based asymmetric synthesis, thereby enabling increasing applications in industrial synthesis.² In the past few decades, a wide range of chiral catalytic systems with diverse activation modes have been developed. However, the fundamental basis for enantiocontrol remains essentially unchanged, i.e., spatial interaction between the substrate and catalyst.^1,2 For example, in the construction of a tetrahedral C(sp³)-chiral center from a prochiral C(sp²)-based planar substrate (e.g., carbocation, radical, carbonyl, and olefin), a chiral catalyst typically provides enantiodifferentiation by blocking one face of the plane and directing the reaction partner (Y) to approach towards the other face (Scheme 1a). To achieve this, the catalyst must be able to effectively discriminate between the two substituents (R¹ and R²) on the prochiral carbon. Obviously, the larger the difference of these two substituents is, the better enantioselectivity will be expected. Consequently, it has been well-established to achieve high enantioselectivity for cases bearing two sterically different groups (e.g., alkyl/aryl vs. H and large alkyl vs. small alkyl). In contrast, for cases bearing two substituents of a similar size, it remains challenging.¹Open in a separate windowScheme 1Introduction to asymmetric differentiation in C(sp²)-prochiral centers.1,1-Diarylmethinyl stereocenters are a widely prevalent structural motif in various natural products and biologically important molecules.³ Asymmetric addition to the 1,1-diaryl C C and C = X (X = heteroatom) bonds represents one of the most direct approaches for the construction of this unit.^4–8 However, this requires effective discrimination between two (often) sterically similar aryl groups, which represents a notable challenge in asymmetric catalysis (Scheme 1b).⁴ So far, success has mainly relied on the use of a directing group in one aryl group to allow catalyst recognition (e.g., by coordination) or electronic difference by incorporating electron-donating/withdrawing groups.^6,7 Notably, the effective enantiodifferentiation between aryl and heteroaryl groups still remains challenging, particularly in the absence of a directing group.⁸ Moreover, despite the above-mentioned important progress, it is worth noting that almost all these examples relied on metal catalysis, and little success has been achieved by organocatalysis.^4–8 In this context, here we describe organocatalytic discrimination of non-directing aryl and heteroaryl groups, providing access to highly enantioenriched triarylmethanes, and in view of the general diverse biological activities of triarylmethanes,⁹ we have also investigated the anticancer and antiviral activities of these products.Indole imine methides (IIMs) have recently emerged as versatile intermediates for the asymmetric synthesis of enantioenriched indole derivatives, a family of useful units in medicinal chemistry.^10–12 In particular, those with the methide motif adorned in the 2-position of indole are particularly useful to construct indole-fused polyheterocycles via asymmetric annulation processes, as pioneered by Shi and co-workers.^10,11 In continuation of our interest in IIMs,¹² we envisioned that these types of intermediates would be a good platform to study the power of organocatalysis for the challenging discrimination between aryl and heteroaryl groups lacking a directing group (Scheme 1c). However, additional challenges should be expected since this intermediate II is likely generated as a Z/E mixture, typically in equilibrium with carbocation I. Therefore, the equilibrium should be made in synergy with the nucleophilic addition step to allow dynamic asymmetric control in order to achieve high enantioselectivity.To test our hypothesis, we employed racemic tertiary alcohol 1a as the model precursor to the 2-indole imine methide intermediate. Notably, no directing group is incorporated in the two aryl groups (phenyl and thienyl) to be discriminated by the catalyst. Despite the above-mentioned substantial challenges in this asymmetric control, considerable efforts were devoted to condition optimization and ultimately led to excellent reaction efficiency and enantiocontrol (13 With benzothiazoline 2a as the hydride source,¹⁴ the asymmetric reduction proceeded smoothly to form indole-containing triarylmethane 3a under mild conditions in essentially quantitative yield and 95% ee (entry 1, 15 gave drastically low enantiocontrol (entry 8). Other solvents did not provide a better result either (entries 9–11). The reaction was very sensitive to coordinating solvents, such as ether and ethyl acetate, which completely shut down the reaction, presumably due to competing binding with the acid catalyst. Decreasing the reaction temperature to 0 °C maintained high enantioselectivity, but moderately affected the reaction rate (entry 12). Finally, at a higher concentration, slightly lower enantioselectivity was observed (entry 13).Evaluation of the reaction conditions^a

Polycyclic heteroaromatics via hydrazine-catalyzed ring-closing carbonyl–olefin metathesis

The use of hydrazine-catalyzed ring-closing carbonyl–olefin metathesis (RCCOM) to synthesize polycyclic heteroaromatic (PHA) compounds is described. In particular, substrates bearing Lewis basic functionalities such as pyridine rings and amines, which strongly inhibit acid catalyzed RCCOM reactions, are shown to be compatible with this reaction. Using 5 mol% catalyst loadings, a variety of PHA structures can be synthesized from biaryl alkenyl aldehydes, which themselves are readily prepared by cross-coupling.

Hydrazine catalysis enables the ring-closing carbonyl–olefin metathesis (RCCOM) to form polycyclic heteroaromatics, especially those with basic functionality.

Polycyclic heteroaromatic (PHA) structures comprise the core framework of many valuable compounds with a diverse range of applications (Fig. 1A).¹ For example, polycyclic azines (e.g. quinolines) are embedded in many alkaloid natural products, including diplamine² and eupolauramine³ to name just a few. These types of structures are also of interest for their biological activity, such as with the inhibitor of the Src-SH3 protein–protein interaction shown in Fig. 1A.⁴ Many nitrogenous PHAs are also useful as ligands for transition metal catalysis, as exemplified by the widely used ligand 1,10-phenanthroline.⁵ Meanwhile, chalcogenoarenes⁶ such as dinaphthofuran⁷ and benzodithiophene⁸ have attracted high interest for both their medicinal properties⁹ and especially for their potential use as organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs), organic photovoltaics (OPVs), and organic field-effect transistors (OFETs).¹⁰ These and numerous other examples have inspired the development of a wide variety of strategies to construct PHAs.^1,11–14 Although these approaches are as varied as the structures they target, the wide range of molecular configurations within PHA chemical space and the challenges inherent in exerting control over heteroatom position and global structure make novel syntheses of these structures a topic of continuing interest.Open in a separate windowFig. 1(A) Examples of PHAs. (B) RCCOM strategy for PHA synthesis. (C) Lewis base inhibition for Lewis acid vs. hydrazine catalyzed RCCOM. (D) Hydrazine-catalyzed RCCOM for PHA synthesis.One potentially advantageous strategy for PHA synthesis is the use of ring-closing carbonyl–olefin metathesis¹⁵ (RCCOM) to forge one of the PHA rings, starting from a suitably disposed alkenyl aldehyde precursor 2 that can be easily assembled by cross-coupling (Fig. 1B). In related work, the application of RCCOM to form polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) was reported by Schindler in 2017.¹⁶ In this case, 5 mol% FeCl₃ catalyzed the metathesis of substrates to form phenanthrenes and related compounds in high yields at room temperature. This method was highly attractive for its efficiency, its use of an earth-abundant metal catalyst, and the production of benign acetone as the only by-product. Nevertheless, one obvious drawback to the use of Lewis acid activation is that the presence of any functionality that is significantly more Lewis basic than the carbonyl group can be expected to strongly inhibit these reactions (Fig. 1C). Such a limitation thus renders this method incompatible with a wide swath of complex molecules, especially PHAs comprised of azine rings. This logic argues for a mechanistically orthogonal RCCOM approach that allows for the synthesis of PHA products with a broader range of ring systems and functional groups.We have developed an alternative approach to catalytic carbonyl–olefin metathesis that makes use of the condensation of 1,2-dialkylhydrazines 5 with aldehydes to form hydrazonium ions 6 as the key catalyst–substrate association step.^17–19 This interaction has a much broader chemoorthogonality profile than Lewis acid–base interactions and should thus be much less prone to substrate inhibition than acid-catalyzed approaches. In this Communication, we demonstrate that hydrazine-catalyzed RCCOM enables the rapid assembly of PHAs bearing basic functionality (Fig. 1D).For our optimization studies, we chose biaryl pyridine aldehyde 7 as the substrate (20 salt 11 was also productive (entry 2), albeit somewhat less so. Notably, iron(iii) chloride generated no conversion at either ambient or elevated temperatures (entries 3 and 4). Trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) was similarly ineffective (entry 5). Meanwhile, a screen of various solvents revealed that, while the transformation could occur in a range of media (entries 6–9), THF was optimal. Finally, by raising the temperature to 90 °C (entry 10) or 100 °C (entry 11), up to 96% NMR yield (85% isolated yield) of adduct 8 could be obtained in the same time period.Optimization studies^a

Manganese(i)-catalyzed access to 1,2-bisphosphine ligands

Chiral bisphosphine ligands are of key importance in transition-metal-catalyzed asymmetric synthesis of optically active products. However, the transition metals typically used are scarce and expensive noble metals, while the synthetic routes to access chiral phosphine ligands are cumbersome and lengthy. To make homogeneous catalysis more sustainable, progress must be made on both fronts. Herein, we present the first catalytic asymmetric hydrophosphination of α,β-unsaturated phosphine oxides in the presence of a chiral complex of earth-abundant manganese(i). This catalytic system offers a short two-step, one-pot synthetic sequence to easily accessible and structurally tunable chiral 1,2-bisphosphines in high yields and enantiomeric excess. The resulting bidentate phosphine ligands were successfully used in asymmetric catalysis as part of earth-abundant metal based organometallic catalysts.

Chiral bisphosphine ligands are of key importance in transition-metal-catalyzed asymmetric synthesis of optically active products. Mn(i)-catalyzed hydrophosphination offers a two-step, one-pot synthetic sequence to access chiral 1,2-bisphosphines.

The vast majority of important catalytic transformations make use of very effective catalysts based on scarce, expensive and toxic noble transition metals and phosphine containing ligands that, especially when chiral, are often as expensive as the noble metals themselves due to their cumbersome synthetic accessibility.¹ The past decade has witnessed significant progress towards the development of competitive catalysts that contain earth-abundant transition metals instead. These catalysts, however, still frequently rely on the use of chiral phosphine ligands. Bisphosphine ligands (Scheme 1A) for instance Pyrphos,^2a Chiraphos,^2b as well as Josiphos^2c are among the most successful chiral ligands used in homogeneous catalysis. In recent years, bis(phosphine) monoxide compounds such as Bozphos,^2d and Binap(o)^2e have been shown to be powerful ligands in asymmetric catalysis as well. Unfortunately, the synthesis of these frequently and successfully used chiral phosphine-based ligands often requires stoichiometric amounts of chiral auxiliaries, enantiopure substrates, or separation by resolution to obtain them enantiomerically pure.^1b–fOpen in a separate windowScheme 1(A) Examples of phosphine ligands commonly used in homogeneous catalysis. (B) Catalytic asymmetric hydrophosphination of various Michael acceptors. (C) This work: Mn (i)-catalyzed access to chiral 1,2-bisphosphines.Catalytic asymmetric hydrophosphination is one of the most straightforward approaches for generating optically active P-chiral or C-chiral phosphines, from which chiral ligands can be derived.³ The potential of hydrophosphination reactions to access enantioenriched chiral phosphines catalytically was demonstrated for the first time by Glueck and coworkers in 2001 using a catalytic system based on Pt and the chiral bisphosphine ligand Me-DuPhos.⁴ Following the publication of this initial work, precious noble metal complexes such as chiral Pd or Pt catalysts have been widely used in the field of asymmetric hydrophosphination (Scheme 1B).⁵ Only few examples utilizing earth-abundant metals such as Ni,⁶ Cu⁷ and very recently Mn⁸ have been reported to date for catalytic asymmetric hydrophosphination. Apart from metal based catalytic systems, examples of asymmetric organocatalytic hydrophosphination reactions were also presented in the literature.⁹ So far, all successful methods that rely on the addition of phosphines to α,β-unsaturated conjugated systems provide chiral monophosphines.³ Interestingly, the only reported example of catalytic hydrophosphination that allows access to chiral 1,2-bisphosphine ligands utilizes a Michael acceptor with a P-containing electron-withdrawing group.^7bWhile α,β-unsaturated phosphine oxides are bench stable and readily available Michael acceptors, their application is less common when compared to conventional carbonyl based Michael acceptors, which is in part due to their lower reactivity.¹⁰ Yin and co-workers found an elegant solution to this problem by transforming α,β-unsaturated phosphine oxides into phosphine sulphides. This allows a ‘soft–soft’ interaction to be established between the Cu(i) atom of the chiral Cu(i)-catalyst and the S atom of the phosphine sulphide, enabling catalytic hydrophosphination towards the synthesis of chiral bisphosphines.^7b While successful in applying this strategy for catalytic synthesis of variety of chiral bisphosphines, nevertheless it requires 6-steps synthetic sequence starting from α,β-unsaturated phosphine oxides (Scheme 1C).^7bHerein, we present a highly efficient, short and scalable catalytic protocol for the synthesis of chiral 1,2-bisphosphines from readily available, bench stable α,β-unsaturated phosphine oxides employing Mn(i)-catalyzed hydrophosphination as its core transformation (Scheme 1D).The last five years witnessed remarkable success of Mn(i)-complexes as catalysts for reductive transformations of carbonyl compounds including asymmetric variants.^11–13 Next to these reports, we have recently demonstrated that such complexes are capable of catalytic H–P bond activation of diarylphosphines.⁸ Based on these findings we hypothesised that Mn(i)-complexes should be able to bring the phosphine oxide and the phosphine reagents into closer proximity thus allowing the hydrophosphination reaction to take place directly with α,β-unsaturated phosphine oxides. This approach would avoid the additional synthetic steps and purifications procedures necessitated by the installation and removal of the sulphur atom that are intrinsic to the method utilising phosphine sulphides.At the outset of this work, bench-stable α-substituted α,β-unsaturated phosphine oxide 1a was chosen as the model substrate in the reaction with HPPh₂ (i)-complex, Mn(i)-L, developed by Clark and co-workers13a,d for hydrogenation and transfer hydrogenation of carbonyl compounds, was selected as the chiral catalyst. After extensive optimization, the reaction with 5 mol% t-PentOK, 2.5 mol% Mn(i)-L, 1.05 equiv. of HPPh₂ in toluene at room temperature for 16 hours was found to be optimal. Under these conditions, the product 3aa was obtained with 96% isolated yield and over 99% ee (entry 1).Optimization of the reaction conditions^a

Illuminating anti-hydrozirconation: controlled geometric isomerization of an organometallic species

A general strategy to enable the formal anti-hydrozirconation of arylacetylenes is reported that merges cis-hydrometallation using the Schwartz Reagent (Cp₂ZrHCl) with a subsequent light-mediated geometric isomerization at λ = 400 nm. Mechanistic delineation of the contra-thermodynamic isomerization step indicates that a minor reaction product functions as an efficient in situ generated photocatalyst. Coupling of the E-vinyl zirconium species with an alkyne unit generates a conjugated diene: this has been leveraged as a selective energy transfer catalyst to enable E → Z isomerization of an organometallic species. Through an Umpolung metal–halogen exchange process (Cl, Br, I), synthetically useful vinyl halides can be generated (up to Z : E = 90 : 10). This enabling platform provides a strategy to access nucleophilic and electrophilic alkene fragments in both geometric forms from simple arylacetylenes.

A general strategy to enable the formal anti-hydrozirconation of arylacetylenes is reported that merges cis-hydrometallation using the Schwartz Reagent (Cp₂ZrHCl) with a subsequent light-mediated geometric isomerization at λ = 400 nm.

The venerable Schwartz reagent (Cp₂ZrHCl) is totemic in the field of hydrometallation,¹ where reactivity is dominated by syn-selective M–H addition across the π-bond.^2,3 This mechanistic foundation can be leveraged to generate well-defined organometallic coupling partners that are amenable to stereospecific functionalization. Utilizing terminal alkynes as readily available precursors,⁴ hydrozirconation constitutes a powerful strategy to generate E-configured vinyl nucleophiles that, through metal–halogen exchange, can be converted to vinyl electrophiles in a formal Umpolung process.⁵ Whilst this provides a versatile platform to access the electronic antipodes of the E-isomer, the mechanistic course of addition renders access to the corresponding Z-isomer conspicuously challenging. To reconcile the synthetic importance of this transformation with the intrinsic challenges associated with anti-hydrometallation and metallometallation,⁶ it was envisaged that a platform to facilitate geometric isomerization⁷ would be of value. Moreover, coupling this to a metal–halogen exchange would provide a simple Umpolung matrix to access both stereo-isomers from a common alkyne precursor (Fig. 1).Open in a separate windowFig. 1The stereochemical course of alkyne hydrometallation using the Schwartz reagent and an Umpolung platform to generate both stereo-isomers from a common alkyne precursor.Confidence in this conceptual blueprint stemmed from a report by Erker and co-workers, in which irradiating the vinyl zirconium species derived from phenyl acetylene (0.5 M in benzene) with a mercury lamp (Philips HPK 125 and Pyrex filter) induced geometric isomerization.⁸ Whilst Hg lamps present challenges in terms of safety, temperature regulation, cost and wavelength specificity, advances in LED technology mitigate all of these points. Therefore, a process of reaction development was initiated to generalize the anti-hydrozirconation of arylacetylenes. Crucial to the success of this venture was identifying the light-based activation mode that facilitates alkene isomerization. Specifically, it was necessary to determine whether this process was enabled by direct irradiation of the vinyl zirconium species, or if the E → Z directionality results from a subsequent selective energy transfer process involving a facilitator. Several accounts of the incipient vinyl zirconium species reacting with a second alkyne unit to generate a conjugated diene have been disclosed.^9,10 It was therefore posited that the minor by-product diene may be a crucial determinant in driving this isomerization (Fig. 2).Open in a separate windowFig. 2A working hypothesis for the light-mediated anti-hydrozirconation via selective energy transfer catalysis.To advance this working hypothesis and generalize the formal anti-hydrozirconation process, the reaction of Cp₂ZrHCl with 1-bromo-4-ethynylbenzene (A-1) in CH₂Cl₂ was investigated (‡ for full details). This generates a versatile electrophile for downstream synthetic applications. Gratifyingly, after only 15 minutes, a Z : E-composition of 50 : 50 was reached (entry 1) and, following treatment with NBS, the desired vinyl bromide (Z)-1 was obtained in 76% yield (isomeric mixture) over the two steps. Further increasing the irradiation by 15 minute increments (entries 2–4) revealed that the optimum reaction time for the isomerization is 45 minutes (74%, Z : E = 73 : 27, entry 3). Extending the reaction time to 60 minutes (entry 4, 54%) did not lead to an improvement in selectivity and this was further confirmed by irradiating the reaction mixture for 90 minutes (entry 5). In both cases, a notable drop in yield was observed and therefore the remainder of the study was performed using the conditions described in entry 3. Next, the influence of the irradiation wavelength on the isomerization process was examined (entries 6–11). From a starting wavelength of λ = 369 nm, which gave a Z : E-ratio of 27 : 73 (entry 6), a steady improvement was observed by increasing the wavelength to λ = 374 nm (Z : E = 44 : 56, entry 7) and λ = 383 nm (Z : E = 53 : 47, entry 8). The selectivity reached a plateau at λ = 400 nm, with higher wavelengths proving to be detrimental (Z : E = 60 : 40 at λ = 414 nm, entry 9; Z : E = 26 : 74 at λ = 435 nm, entry 10). It is interesting to note that at λ = 520 nm, Z-1 was not detected by ¹H NMR (entry 11).Reaction optimization^a

Ruthenium pincer complex-catalyzed heterocycle compatible alkoxycarbonylation of alkyl iodides: substrate keeps the catalyst active

The electron pair of the heteroatom in heterocycles will coordinate with metal catalysts and decrease or even inhibit their catalytic activity consequently. In this work, a pincer ruthenium-catalyzed heterocycle compatible alkoxycarbonylation of alkyl iodides has been developed. Benefitting from the pincer ligand, a variety of heterocycles, such as thiophenes, morpholine, unprotected indoles, pyrrole, pyridine, pyrimidine, furan, thiazole, pyrazole, benzothiadiazole, and triazole, are compatible here.

A pincer ruthenium-catalyzed heterocycle compatible alkoxycarbonylation of alkyl iodides has been developed.

Since the pioneering work on the catalytic alkoxycarbonylation of unactivated alkyl halides reported by Heck and Breslow in 1963,¹ this transformation has attracted a great deal of interest due to its modularity and the direct employment of CO as a cheap and abundant C1 feedstock.² However, compared with aryl halides, the development of alkoxycarbonylation of alkyl halides has been much more gradual.^2,3 This situation is due to both the slow oxidative addition of C(sp³)–X bonds to the metal center and the easy β-hydride elimination of the alkyl-metal intermediate, particularly in the presence of carbon monoxide.⁴ Several catalytic systems for this process have been successfully developed in recent years (Scheme 1A), such as pure radical-based systems,⁵ palladium-based systems,⁶hν/palladium-based systems,⁷ rhodium-based systems,⁸ copper-based systems,⁹ and other metal carbonyl complex-based systems.¹⁰ Very recently, Neumann, Skrydstrup, and co-workers reported a nickel pincer-mediated alkoxycarbonylation for complete carbon isotope replacement, and this approach provided a procedure for generating carbon-labeled versions of potential simple carboxylate prodrug derivatives (Scheme 1B).¹¹ Besides their advantages, in these cases the heterocycles, particularly those containing multiple N atoms or NH groups, are hardly compatible, which is considered as a remaining challenge. We attribute this to the Lewis-basic atoms in heterocyclic motifs being particularly detrimental to catalyst activity and potentially quenching the radical intermediates.¹² Indeed, the development of heterocycle compatible catalytic systems remains an exciting task in the field of alkoxycarbonylation.Open in a separate windowScheme 1Approaches to alkoxycarbonylation of alkyl halides.On the other hand, heterocycles constitute important structural components of biologically active compounds and are ubiquitous in agrochemical and pharmaceutical industries.¹³ In a recent survey, 88% of small molecule drugs approved by the FDA between 2015 and June 2020 were found to contain at least one N-heterocycle.¹⁴ Specifically, heterocyclic subunits can modify the solubility, lipophilicity, polarity and hydrogen bonding ability of biologically active agents, thereby optimizing the corresponding ADME/Tox (absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity) properties of drugs or drug candidates.¹⁵ Under this premise, the pursuit of new synthetic methods with good heterocycle compatibility is a worthwhile endeavor.Herein we report a heterocycle compatible catalytic system for alkoxycarbonylation of alkyl iodides. With a ruthenium pincer complex as the catalyst, the tight coordination of the pincer ligand can effectively prevent the ruthenium from deactivation by heterocycle coordination (Scheme 1C). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first example of a ruthenium pincer complex-catalyzed carbonylation reaction.¹⁶ This new catalytic system might lead to novel synthetic routes toward heterocyclic carbonyl-containing compounds.Pincer complexes of ruthenium are among the most effective catalysts for hydrogen transfer reactions between alcohols and unsaturated compounds.¹⁷ We initially used it to attempt the carbonylative coupling of acetophenone with iodobutane, as shown in eqn (1). Although we did not get the desired product I, the ester II could be obtained in 22% yield. By literature survey, we found there was no example showing that alkyl halides could be activated by ruthenium in previous reports on carbonylation reactions.^3,16,18 We thus envisioned that the ruthenium pincer complex played a key role in this transformation.^11,191With this discovery in mind, we started the investigation of this ruthenium-catalyzed alkoxycarbonylation of alkyl halides by examining the reaction of (3-iodopropyl)benzene (1) with isopropanol (2) at 100 °C under a CO atmosphere (10 bar) in the presence of a catalytic amount of various readily available ruthenium pincer complexes (†). The improved yield of the desired product 3 was obtained when utilizing Milstein''s catalyst Ru-2²⁰ (21 were applied in the reaction; however, the selectivity obtained was unsatisfactory (eqn (2), when we removed isopropanol from the reaction, byproduct 2 which was produced by carbonylative homocoupling of the alkyl halide could be obtained in 71% yield.²² However, the reduced conversion and the absence of byproduct 3 implied that the alcohol plays more than a nucleophile role in this reaction. It is important to mention that the addition of water had no effect on the yield of byproduct 2. Concerning the effects from bases, organic bases, such as NEt₃ and DBU, were tested, but no desired ester could be detected. Inorganic bases, including K₂CO₃ and K₃PO₄, were also tested, but very low yield of the ester was obtained. Notably, comparable yield of ester 3 can be obtained when LiO^tBu was used as the base.2Optimization of the alkoxycarbonylation of 1^a

Access to P-stereogenic compounds via desymmetrizing enantioselective bromination

A novel and efficient desymmetrizing asymmetric ortho-selective mono-bromination of bisphenol phosphine oxides under chiral squaramide catalysis was reported. Using this asymmetric ortho-bromination strategy, a wide range of chiral bisphenol phosphine oxides and bisphenol phosphinates were obtained with good to excellent yields (up to 92%) and enantioselectivities (up to 98.5 : 1.5 e.r.). The reaction could be scaled up, and the synthetic utility of the desired P-stereogenic compounds was proved by transformations and application in an asymmetric reaction.

A highly efficient desymmetrizing asymmetric bromination of bisphenol phosphine oxides was developed, providing a wide range of chiral bisphenol phosphine oxides and bisphenol phosphinates with high yields and enantioselectivities.

P-Stereogenic compounds are a class of privileged structures, which have been widely present in natural products, drugs and biologically active molecules (Fig. 1a).^1–4 In addition, they are also important chiral materials for the development of chiral catalysts and ligands (Fig. 1b), because the chirality of the phosphorus atom is closer to the catalytic center which can cause remarkable stereo-induction.^5,6 Thus, the development of efficient methods for the synthesis of P-stereogenic compounds with novel structures and functional groups is very meaningful.^5a Conventional syntheses of P-stereogenic compounds mainly depended on the resolution of diastereomeric mixtures and chiral-auxiliary-based approaches, in which stoichiometric amounts of chiral reagents are usually needed.⁷ By comparison, asymmetric catalytic strategies, including asymmetric desymmetric reactions of dialkynyl, dialkenyl, diaryl and bisphenol phosphine oxides,^8–14 (dynamic) kinetic resolution of tertiary phosphine oxides,¹⁵ and asymmetric reactions of secondary phosphine oxides,¹⁶ can effectively solve the above-mentioned problems and have been considered as the most direct and efficient synthesis methods for constructing P-chiral phosphine oxides (Fig. 1c). Among them, organocatalytic asymmetric desymmetrization methods have been sporadic, in which the reaction sites were mainly limited to the hydroxyl group of bisphenol phosphine oxides that hindered their further transformation.^8–11 It is worth mentioning that asymmetric desymmetrization methods, especially organocatalytic desymmetrization reactions, due to their unique advantages of mild reaction conditions and wide substrate scope, have become an important strategy for asymmetric synthesis. Accordingly, the development of efficient organocatalytic desymmetrization strategy for the synthesis of important functionalized P-stereogenic compounds which contain multiple conversion groups is very meaningful and highly desirable.Open in a separate windowFig. 1(a) Examples of natural products containing P-stereogenic centers. (b) P-Stereogenic compound type ligand and catalyst. (c) Typical P-stereogenic compounds'' synthetic strategies.On the other hand, asymmetric bromination has been demonstrated to be one of the most attractive approaches for chiral compound syntheses.¹⁷ Since the pioneering work on peptide catalyzed asymmetric bromination for the construction of biaryl atropisomers,^18a the reports on constructing axially biaryl atropisomers,¹⁸ C–N axially chiral compounds,¹⁹ atropisomeric benzamides,²⁰ axially chiral isoquinoline N-oxides,²¹ and axially chiral N-aryl quinoids²² by electrophilic aromatic bromination have been well developed (Scheme 1a). In comparison, the desymmetrization of phenol through asymmetric bromination to construct central chirality remains a daunting task. Miller discovered a series of tailor made peptide catalyzed enantioselective desymmetrizations of diarylmethylamide through ortho-bromination (Scheme 1b).²³ Recently, Yeung realized amino-urea catalyzed desymmetrizing asymmetric ortho-selective mono-bromination of phenol derivatives to fix a new class of potent privileged bisphenol catalyst cores with excellent yields and enantioselectivities (Scheme 1b).²⁴ Despite this elegant work, there is no report on the synthesis of P-centered chiral compounds using the desymmetrizing asymmetric bromination strategy.Open in a separate windowScheme 1(a) Constructing axially chiral compounds by asymmetric bromination. (b) Known synthesis of central chiral compounds via asymmetric bromination. (c) This work: access to P-stereogenic compounds via desymmetrizing enantioselective bromination.Taking into account the above-mentioned consideration, we speculated that bisphenol phosphine oxides and bisphenol phosphinates are potential substrate candidates for desymmetrizing asymmetric bromination to construct P-stereogenic centers. The advantages of using bisphenol phosphine oxides and bisphenol phosphinates as substrates are shown in two aspects. First, the ortho-position of electron rich phenol is easy to take place electrophilic bromination reaction. Second, the corresponding bromination product structure contains abundant synthetic conversion groups, including bromine, hydroxyl group, alkoxy group and phosphoryl group. To achieve this goal, two challenges need to be overcome: (i) finding a suitable chiral catalyst for the desymmetrization process to induce enantiomeric control is troublesome, due to the remote distance between the prochiral phosphorus center and the enantiotopic site; (ii) selectively brominating one phenol to inhibit the formation of an achiral by-product is difficult. Herein, we report a chiral squaramide catalyzed asymmetric ortho-bromination strategy to construct a wide range of chiral bisphenol phosphine oxides and bisphenol phosphinates with good to excellent yields and enantioselectivities (Scheme 1c). It is worth mentioning that the obtained P-stereogenic compounds can be further transformed at multiple sites.Our initial investigation was carried out with bis(2-hydroxyphenyl)phosphine oxide 1a and N-bromosuccinimide (NBS) 2a as the model substrates, 10 mol% chiral amino-thiourea 4a as the catalyst, and toluene as the solvent, which were stirred at −78 °C for 12 h. As a result, the reaction gave the desired desymmetrization product 3a in 65% yield with 56 : 44 e.r. (Table 1, entry 1). Then, thiourea 4b was tested, in which a little better result was obtained (Table 1, entry 2). To our delight, using the chiral squaramides 4c–4f as the catalysts, the enantiomeric ratios of the desymmetrization products had been significantly improved (Table 1, entries 3–6). Especially, when chiral squaramide catalyst 4c was applied to this reaction, the enantiomeric ratio of 3a was increased to 95 : 5 (Table 1, entry 3). To further improve the yield and enantioselectivity, we next optimized the reaction conditions by varying reaction media and additives. As shown in Table 1, the reaction was affected by the solvent dramatically. Product 3a was obtained with low yield and enantioselectivity in DCM (Table 1, entry 7). Also, when Et₂O was used as the solvent, the yield and e.r. value of product 3a were all decreased (Table 1, entry 8). As a result, the initial used toluene was the optimal solvent. We also inspected the effect of different bromine sources, and found that the initially used NBS was the optimal one (Table 1, entries 3, 11 and 12). Fortunately, by adjusting the amount of bisphenol phosphine oxides to 1.5 equiv., the yield and the enantiomeric ratio of 3a were increased to 80% and 96.5 : 3.5, respectively (Table 1, entries 3, 13 and 14). Further increasing the amount of bisphenol phosphine oxides to 2.0 equiv. resulted in a reduced enantioselectivity (Table 1, entry 15).Optimization of the reaction conditions^a

Hydroxy-directed fluorination of remote unactivated C(sp3)–H bonds: a new age of diastereoselective radical fluorination

We report a photochemically induced, hydroxy-directed fluorination that addresses the prevailing challenge of high diastereoselectivity in this burgeoning field. Numerous simple and complex motifs showcase a spectrum of regio- and stereochemical outcomes based on the configuration of the hydroxy group. Notable examples include a long-sought switch in the selectivity of the refractory sclareolide core, an override of benzylic fluorination, and a rare case of 3,3′-difluorination. Furthermore, calculations illuminate a low barrier transition state for fluorination, supporting our notion that alcohols are engaged in coordinated reagent direction. A hydrogen bonding interaction between the innate hydroxy directing group and fluorine is also highlighted for several substrates with ¹⁹F–¹H HOESY experiments, calculations, and more.

We report a photochemical, hydroxy-directed fluorination that addresses the prevailing challenge of high diastereoselectivity. Numerous motifs showcase a range of regio- and stereochemical outcomes based on the configuration of the hydroxy group.

The hydroxy (OH) group is treasured and versatile in chemistry and biology.¹ Its ubiquity in nature and broad spectrum of chemical properties make it an attractive source as a potential directing group.² The exploitation of the mild Lewis basicity exhibited by alcohols has afforded several elegant pathways for selective functionalization (e.g., Sharpless epoxidation,³ homogeneous hydrogenation,⁴ cross-coupling reactions,⁵ among others⁶). Recently, we reported a photochemically promoted carbonyl-directed aliphatic fluorination, and most notably, established the key role that C–H⋯O hydrogen bonds play in the success of the reaction.⁷ Our detailed mechanistic investigations prompt us to postulate that other Lewis basic functional groups (such as –OH) can direct fluorination in highly complementary ways.⁸ In this communication, we report a hydroxy-directed aliphatic fluorination method that exhibits unique directing properties and greatly expands the domain of radical fluorination into the less established realm governing high diastereoselectivity.⁹Our first inclination that functional groups other than carbonyls may influence fluorination regiochemical outcomes was obtained while screening substrates for our published ketone-directed radical-based method (Scheme 1).^8a In this example, we surmised that oxidation of the tertiary hydroxy group on substrate 1 cannot occur and would demonstrate functional group tolerance (directing to C11, compound 2). Surprisingly, the two major regioisomers (products 3 and 4) are derivatized by Selectfluor (SF) on C12 and C16 – indicative of the freely rotating hydroxyl directing fluorination. Without an obvious explanation of how these groups could be involved in dictating regiochemistry, we continued the mechanistic study of carbonyl-directed fluorination (Scheme 2A). We established that the regioselective coordinated hydrogen atom abstraction occurs by hydrogen bonding between a strategically placed carbonyl and Selectfluor radical dication (SRD).⁷ However, we noted that the subsequent radical fluorination is not diastereoselective due to the locally planar nature of carbonyl groups. Thus, we posed the question: are there other directing groups that can provide both regio- and diastereoselectivity? Such a group would optimally be attached to a sp³ hybridized carbon; thus the “three dimensional” hydroxy carbon logically comes to mind as an attractive choice, and Scheme 1 illustrates the first positive hint.Open in a separate windowScheme 1Observed products for the fluorination of compound 1.Open in a separate windowScheme 2(A) Proposed mechanism, (B) β-caryophyllene alcohol hypochlorite derivative synthetic probe, (C) isodesmic relation of transition states showing the general importance of the hydroxy group to reactivity (ωB97xd/6-31+G*), and (D) ¹H NMR experiment with Selectfluor and various additives at different concentrations.We began our detailed study with a simple substrate that contains a tertiary hydroxyl group. Alcohol 5 was synthesized stereoselectively by the reaction of 3-methylcyclohexanone, FeCl₃, and 4-chlorophenylmagnesium bromide;¹⁰ the 4-chlorophenyl substituent allows for an uncomplicated product identification and isolation (aromatic chromophore). We sought to determine optimal reaction conditions by examination of numerous photosensitizers, bases, solvents, and light sources (7 Although we utilize cool blue LEDs (sharp cutoff ca. 400 nm), CFLs (small amount of UVB (280–315 nm) and UVA (315–400 nm)) are useable as well.¹¹ A mild base additive was also found to neutralize adventitious HF and improve yields in the substrates indicated ( EntrySensitizer ¹⁹F yield1None0% 2 Benzil 83% 3Benzil, no base63%4Benzil, K₂CO₃68%5Benzil, CFL light source75%65-Dibenzosuberenone15%74,4′-Difluorobenzil63%89,10-Phenantherenequinone71%9Perylene8%10Methyl benzoylformate42%Open in a separate window^aUnless stated otherwise: substrate (0.25 mmol, 1.0 equiv.), Selectfluor (0.50 mmol, 2.0 equiv.), NaHCO₃ (0.25 mmol, 1.0 equiv.), and sensitizer (0.025 mmol, 10 mol%) were dissolved in MeCN (4.0 mL) and irradiated with cool white LEDs for 14 h.Substrate scope^a

Lithium achieves sequence selective ring-opening terpolymerisation (ROTERP) of ternary monomer mixtures

Heteroatom-containing degradable polymers have strong potential as sustainable replacements for petrochemically derived materials. However, to accelerate and broaden their uptake greater structural diversity and new synthetic methodologies are required. Here we report a sequence selective ring-opening terpolymerisation (ROTERP), in which three monomers (A, B, C) are selectively enchained into an (ABA′C)_n sequence by a simple lithium catalyst. Degradable poly(ester-alt-ester-alt-trithiocarbonate)s are obtained in a M_n range from 2.35 to 111.20 kDa which are not easily accessible via other polymerisation methodologies. The choice of alkali metal is key to achieve high activity and to control the terpolymer sequence. ROTERP is mechanistically compatible with ring-opening polymerisation (ROP) allowing switchable catalysis for blockpolymer synthesis. The ROTERP demonstrated in this study could be the first example of an entirely new family of sequence selective terpolymerisations.

A sequence selective ring-opening terpolymerisation of epoxides with CS₂ and phthalic thioanhydride yielding poly(ester-alt-ester-alt-trithiocarbonates) is reported.

Synthetic polymers are now more in demand than ever before and looking at their annually increasing production, a polymer free society is at best a vague memory rather than a vision for the future.¹ As most commodity polymers are based on chemically inert aliphatic –C–C– backbones, most polymer waste shows unappreciable degradation with respect to the polymer''s time in application.^2,3 In answer to the ever-increasing amount of plastic pollution, much effort focuses on the exploration of new heteroatom containing polymers which, because of their more polar bonds making up the backbone, are more susceptible to degradation via physical, chemical and biochemical pathways and even facilitate new chemical recycling methods.^4–8 Besides, there is also a constant demand for entirely new materials to enable technological innovation making new methodologies to synthesise heteroatom containing polymers necessary.Arguably one of the most popular methods to make such polymers is the ring-opening polymerisation (ROP) of a heterocycle A.^9–11 These polymerise under release of their associated ring strain energy to make polymers (A)_n such as poly(thio)ethers, poly(thio)ester and poly(thio)carbonates, only to name a few. Early on it has been realised that in some cases the ROP of three or four-membered heterocycles A can be coupled to the insertion of typically heteroallenes or cyclic anhydrides B to generate alternating copolymers (AB)_n.^12–14 The underlying requirements for (AB)_n polymerisations are a combination of kinetic factors, i.e. monomer A inserting orders of magnitude faster into the active catalyst growing chain-bond than monomer B, and chemoselectivities, i.e. insertion of monomer A resulting in type A active catalyst growing chain-bond that does not show appreciable reactivity with A but only with B (and vice versa). Prominent examples of this alternating (AB)_n ring-opening copolymerisation (ROCOP) include CO₂/epoxide ROCOP yielding polycarbonates and cyclic anhydride/epoxide ROCOP yielding polyesters.^15–17 Sulfur analogous are also accessible such as polythiocarbonate from CS₂/(epoxide or thiirane) and polythioesters from thioanhydride/(epoxide or thiirane) ROCOP.^18–31 Such sulfur rich polymers are attractive high-refractive index materials that can show improved crystallinity and degradability over their all-oxygen analogues and in some cases enable chemical polymer to monomer recycling.^32–39Most relevant to this study is a report by Werner and coworkers on lithium alkoxide catalysed CS₂/epoxide ROCOP yielding poly(monothio-alt-trithiocarbonate)s featuring R–O–C( S)–O–R and R–S–C( S)–S–R links (Fig. 1).^40,41 Such a polymer sequence is unexpected, as the formal product of alternating insertion would be a poly(dithiocarbonate) with R–O–C( S)–S–R links. Furthermore, the polymer shows an unusual “head-to-head-alt-tail-to-tail” selectivity meaning that the R–O–C( S)–O–R links sit adjacent to the tertiary CHR₃ positions of the ring opened epoxide (i.e. “head” position) and that the R–S–C( S)–S–R links sit adjacent to the secondary CH₂R₂ position of the ring opened epoxide (i.e. “tail” position). This sequence let the authors postulate a mechanism involving tail-selective epoxide ring-opening by a dithiocarbonate chain end which is formed by CS₂ insertion into an alkoxide intermediate. The resulting alkoxide intermediate was proposed to backbite into the adjacent dithiocarbonate link which after a rearrangement process resulted in an O/S exchange of the chain end. The rearrangement transforms the alkoxide into a thiolate chain end and the adjacent dithiocarbonate R–O–C( S)–S–R into a monothiocarbonate R–O–C( S)–O–R. CS₂ insertion of the thiolate generates a trithiocarbonate R–S–C( S)–S–R which after epoxide insertion regenerates the alkoxides. In contrast to alkoxides sitting adjacent to R–O–C( S)–S–R links, alkoxides next to R–S–C( S)–S–R links were not proposed to undergo backbiting and O/S exchange. Importantly the initial regioselectivity of the epoxide ring-opening was preserved throughout the rearrangement which explained the “head-to-head-alt-tail-to-tail” selectivity. Interestingly lithium appeared to be crucial as other alkali metal alkoxides failed to catalyse this ROCOP, while more sophisticated catalysts result in much more uncontrolled polymer sequences. Hence it appears that the Li controls which alkoxide intermediate precisely undergoes O/S exchange and to which degree this rearrangement occurs, but the reasons behind the special role of Li remains to be explored. Relatedly the ROCOP of thioanhydrides with epoxides has also been reported and similar exchange processes have been proposed as side reactions.²³ Although not directly proven, this mechanism seemed reasonable and let us hypothesise that lithium catalysts could grant a general access to control the O/S exchange process in ROCOP and even in the polymerisation of ternary monomer mixtures. Furthermore, we reasoned that the two distinct chain ends formed via O/S exchange, i.e. alkoxide and thiolate (type A vide supra), could enable discrimination between two different type B monomers and enable sequence selective terpolymerisations. It should be noted that reports exist in which mixtures of A, B and C (e.g. epoxide A, cyclic anhydride B and CO₂ C) either yield random terpolymers, (AB)_n-ran-(AC)_m poly(esters-ran-carbonate), or block-terpolymers, (AB)_n-b-(AC)_m, polyester-b-polycarbonate. In this case the monomer sequence depends on catalyst selection and reaction conditions, but sequence selective terpolymers, e.g. (ABC)_n or (ABAC)_n, are unknown.^42–48 The hypothesis of O/S exchange here led us to discover a new type of polymerisation, sequence selective ring-opening terpolymerisation (ROTERP) that we report in this contribution. ROTERP produces poly(ester-alt-ester-alt-trithiocarbonates), i.e. (ABA′C)_n sequences, from a mixture of the monosubstituted epoxides propylene oxide (PO) or butylene oxide (BO) A, phthalic thioanhydride (PTA) B and CS₂ C, employing simple lithium salts as the catalyst. Furthermore, model reactions proof the previously postulated O/S rearrangement that enable ROTERP and elucidate the role of the lithium catalyst. Finally, we employed ROTERP in so-called switchable catalysis, in which the onset of ROTERP stops the occurrence of ROP, for the construction of blockpolymers.Open in a separate windowFig. 1(Top) CS₂/epoxide ROCOP and postulated mechanism involving a central O/S exchange reaction, (middle) phthalic thioanhydride (PTA)/epoxide ROCOP and (bottom) PTA/CS₂/epoxide ROTERP reported in this study. R = Me, Et; [R_n] = polymer chain.ROTERP of mixtures of PTA, PO and CS₂ at loadings typically employed in ROCOP catalysis with lithium hexamethyldisilazide (LiHDMS) or lithium benzyloxide (LiOBn) as the catalyst at loadings in the range of 1 eq. LiX : (6.25–500 eq.) PTA : (31.25–2500 eq.) PO : (62.5–5000 eq.) CS₂ yield polymeric materials in 95% selectivity at 80 °C (see 40,47 Spectroscopic analysis of the isolated polymer reveals surprisingly clean NMR spectra given the potential for statistical terpolymerisation of these three monomers. The ¹H NMR spectrum (Fig. 2) shows two main aryl resonances for a symmetrically substituted terephthalate unit from ring opened PTA (δ = 7.72 and 7.56 ppm) as well as one main resonance for the CHMe (δ = 5.42 ppm; head position of the ring-opened epoxide) and CH₂ (δ = 3.90–3.40 ppm; tail position of the ring opened epoxide) groups respectively stemming from the ring opened PO. Correspondingly the ¹³C{¹H} NMR spectrum (ESI Fig. S1^†) reveals the almost exclusive presence of trithiocarbonate R–S–C( S)–S–R (δ = 222.8 ppm) and arylester R–C( O)–O–R (δ ∼166.6 ppm) resonances (94–98%) alongside minor thioester R–C( O)–S–R (δ = 192.7 ppm) resonances (2–6%). ¹H and 2D NMR spectra (ESI Fig. S3^†) show that trithiocarbonate units are positioned adjacent to CH₂ groups while arylesters are connected to the tertiary CHMe groups. The spectra remain unchanged after multiple precipitations from DCM : MeOH or THF : pentane and DOSY NMR shows that all ¹H NMR resonances diffuse at the same rate confirming that these are part of the same species. Furthermore, no other type of thiocarbonate R–(O/S)–C( O/S)–(O/S)–R are part of the polymer. Linkage identity was further substantiated by the ATR-IR spectrum (ESI Fig. S5^†) of these polymers showing an arylester C O stretch at = 1716 cm⁻¹ as well as a thiocarbonate C S stretch at = 1062 cm⁻¹ (ESI Fig. S5^†). Accordingly, the polymers are obtained as yellow solids due the presence of the C S chromophore (λ_abs = 435 nm, ESI Fig. S6^†). MALDI-TOF analysis unfortunately only led to decomposition of the materials and no signals could be identified as previously reported for sulfur-rich polymers.^26,38 Nevertheless ¹H NMR allows some conclusions regarding the topology as both for LiHMDS or LiOBn initiation, resonances for the HMDS and OBn groups can be identified to be part of the purified polymers. Insertion of alkalimetal alkoxides and amides into CS₂ yielding alkali dithiocarbonates and dithiocarbamates have been previously reported.^40,79 This makes initiation via CS₂ insertion likely which defines one end of the polymer and hence indicates that chains are linear rather than cyclic. As ROTERP is followed by CS₂/epoxide coupling once all PTA is consumed (vide infra) we infer that chains are terminated by CS₂ because heteroallene insertion products are generally established to be the resting states of heteroallene/heterocycle coupling reactions.¹²Data showing PTA/CS₂/epoxide ROTERP under different conditions

Assembly of multicyclic isoquinoline scaffolds from pyridines: formal total synthesis of fredericamycin A

The construction of an isoquinoline skeleton typically starts with benzene derivatives as substrates with the assistance of acids or transition metals. Disclosed here is a concise approach to prepare isoquinoline analogues by starting with pyridines to react with β-ethoxy α,β-unsaturated carbonyl compounds under basic conditions. Multiple substitution patterns and a relatively large number of functional groups (including those sensitive to acidic conditions) can be tolerated in our method. In particular, our protocol allows for efficient access to tricyclic isoquinolines found in hundreds of natural products with interesting bioactivities. The efficiency and operational simplicity of introducing structural complexity into the isoquinoline frameworks can likely enable the collective synthesis of a large set of natural products. Here we show that fredericamycin A could be obtained via a short route by using our isoquinoline synthesis as a key step.

A concise approach for rapid assembly of multicyclic isoquinoline scaffolds from pyridines and β-ethoxy α,β-unsaturated carbonyl compounds was developed, which enabled the formal total synthesis of fredericamycin A.

Isoquinolines and their derivatives are common structural motifs in numerous natural products. Among them, the analogues of isoquinolines fused with rings from the benzene side such as 8-hydroxyisoquinolin-1[2H]-one (Fig. 1a) have been found in hundreds of natural products with interesting bioactivities.¹ For example, fredericamycin A and the related family members, isolated from Streptomyces griseus, show both antimicrobial and anti-tumor activities.² Ericamycin is a natural product isolated in the culture of Streptomyces varius n. sp. with anti-staphylococcal activities.³ Due to the widespread presence of isoquinolines in both natural and synthetic molecules, numerous approaches have been developed to assemble this class of scaffolds.⁴ The dominated strategies reported to date focus on forming the new pyridine ring of isoquinolines (Fig. 1b, left part). Classic methods include Bischler–Napieralski isoquinoline synthesis,^4a,b Pictet–Gams isoquinoline synthesis,^4a and Pomeranz–Fritsch reaction.^4a These reactions, proven to be useful since as early as 1893,⁵ have their own merits and limitations. For instance, high reaction temperature (e.g. reflux in toluene) and strong acids are typically required and thus functional group tolerance can become challenging. On the other side, the introduction of structural complexities and substitution patterns is constrained as the substrates have to be pre-settled to favor the formation of pyridine moieties. Here we report a new approach to prepare isoquinoline scaffolds by constructing a new benzene ring (Fig. 1b, right part).⁶ Our method starts with pyridine derivatives as the substrates to react with readily available β-ethoxy α,β-unsaturated carbonyl compounds. The reaction cascade involves five main plausible mechanistic processes (Michael addition, Dieckmann condensation, elimination, aromatization and in situ methylation) to furnish isoquinoline-based products with medium to good yields. The tricyclic isoquinoline-containing products might serve as formal common starting points for rapid total synthesis of a large number of natural products, such as those exemplified in Fig. 1a. In the present study, we demonstrate that starting from the tricyclic isoquinoline adduct 6a prepared using our method, fredericamycin A can be synthesized in 8 steps (Fig. 1c). Our strategy for isoquinoline assembly offers complementary and in certain cases better solutions not readily provided by the classic methods. We expect our method to find impressive applications in concise modular synthesis of complex natural products and molecular libraries, especially those bearing isoquinoline units fused with additional cyclic structures.Open in a separate windowFig. 1Isoquinoline analogues and their synthesis.Our design and initial studies are illustrated in Scheme 1.⁷ We first used pyridine 1a to react with α-substituted cycloenones (2a–2d), in the hope of obtaining isoquinoline 3a as the target product (Scheme 1a). The use of 2a and 2b was inspired by studies from Tamura, in which α-Br in 1,4-naphthoquinone was used as a leaving group to form an aromatic ring.⁸ Unfortunately, no product was formed and most of the starting materials were recovered. When SPh (2c) or SOPh (2d) was incorporated at the α site of the cycloenone, side products 4a and 4b were isolated respectively in moderate yields. The Michael products 4a and 4b could not be further transformed into our desired cyclic product 3a under various conditions. We then studied the use of β-substituted cycloenones (2e–2g) to react with 1a (Scheme 1b). No reactions were observed when 2e or 2f was used. To our delight, when the halogen of 2e/2f was replaced with a methoxy unit (OCH₃, substrate 2g), an encouraging amount of annulation product 3a was detected (10% yield). A side product 5a was also obtained (5% yield) in this initial study and it couldn''t be further transformed into the annulation product 3a under various alkaline conditions. It is noteworthy that, while β-alkoxy cycloenones (specifically, only β-alkoxy cyclohexenones) have been used in Staunton–Weinreb annulation⁹ to prepare fused aromatic compounds, no examples for those containing a heterocyclic aromatic ring were reported.¹⁰ Even for the construction of an aromatic ring without any heteroatom, low yields (mostly ranging from 0 to 30%) often occurred for this type of annulation starting with β-alkoxy cycloenones,⁹ which severely hampered its usage in Staunton–Weinreb annulation for the total synthesis of natural products. Our initial results showcased the possibility of direct assembly of isoquinoline scaffolds from β-methoxy cyclopentenone for the first time, though also in a low yield of 10%.Open in a separate windowScheme 1Proposed routes and initial studies for isoquinoline synthesis.With the initial results in hand, we performed additional condition optimization (11 The β-methoxy cyclopentenone 2g could also react to give 6a in a lower yield of 65% (entry 3). Other bases [such as triethylenediamine (DABCO), diazabicyclo[5.4.0]undec-7-ene (DBU), 4-dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP), lithium bis(trimethylsilyl)amide (LiHMDS) and potassium bis(trimethylsilyl)amide (KHMDS)] gave poorer results with yields ranging from 0 to 42% (entry 4). When THF was changed to other solvents, lower yields (<41%) were obtained (entry 5). Revising the ratio of 1a to 2h from 1 : 1.5 to 1.5 : 1 delivered 6a in 39% to 54% yields (entries 6–8). Lower reaction temperature (e.g. −78 °C) could not improve the outcome of this cascade transformation, but gave 23% yield of 6a together with 16% yield of recovered starting material 2h (entry 9). Long exposure to low temperature in step 1 could also lead to a considerable amount of the undesired elimination product 5a (ca. 29% yield), which was decomposed under the following methylation conditions (step 2). No product was observed in the absence of the methoxy group in 1a as it could stabilize the transition state via the formation of a metallate complex (entry 10).Screening of conditions^a

Direct synthesis of pentasubstituted pyrroles and hexasubstituted pyrrolines from propargyl sulfonylamides and allenamides

Multisubstituted pyrroles are important fragments that appear in many bioactive small molecule scaffolds. Efficient synthesis of multisubstituted pyrroles with different substituents from easily accessible starting materials is challenging. Herein, we describe a metal-free method for the preparation of pentasubstituted pyrroles and hexasubstituted pyrrolines with different substituents and a free amino group by a base-promoted cascade addition–cyclization of propargylamides or allenamides with trimethylsilyl cyanide. This method would complement previous methods and support expansion of the toolbox for the synthesis of valuable, but previously inaccessible, highly substituted pyrroles and pyrrolines. Mechanistic studies to elucidate the reaction pathway have been conducted.

This method is a toolbox for the synthesis of valuable, but previously inaccessible, highly substituted pyrroles and pyrrolines.

Pyrroles are molecules of great interest in a variety of compounds including pharmaceuticals, natural products and other materials. Pyrrole fragments for example are key motifs in bioactive natural molecules, forming the subunit of heme, chlorophyll and bile pigments, and are also found in many clinical drugs, including those in Fig. 1a.¹ Although many classical methods of pyrrole synthesis, including the Paal–Knorr condensation,² the Knorr reaction,³ the Hantzsch reaction,⁴ transition metal-catalyzed reactions,⁵ and multicomponent coupling reactions,⁶ have been developed over many years, the efficient synthesis of multisubstituted pyrroles is still challenging. In condensation syntheses of pyrroles, the major problems lie in the extended syntheses of complex precursors and limited substitution patterns that are allowed. Multicomponent reactions are superior when building pyrrole core structures with more substituents. Among these, the [2+2+1] cycloaddition reaction of alkynes and primary amines is attractive because of the readily available alkyne and amine substrates and the ability to construct fully substituted pyrroles.⁷ However, with the exception of some rare examples,⁸ most [2+2+1] cycloaddition reactions afford pyrroles with two or more identical substituents. The synthesis of multisubstituted pyrroles with all different substituents from simple starting materials therefore remains a major challenge.Open in a separate windowFig. 1Previous reports and this work on propargylamides transformation.Easily accessible propargylamides are classical, privileged building blocks broadly utilized for the synthesis of a large variety of heterocyclic molecules such as pyrroles, pyridines, thiazoles, oxazoles and other relevant organic frameworks.⁹ For example, Looper¹⁰et al. reported the synthesis of 2-aminoimidazoles from propargyl cyanamides and Eycken¹¹ reported a method starting from propargyl guanidines which undergo a 5-exo-dig heterocyclization as shown in Fig. 1b. Subsequently, Wan¹²et al. revealed the cyclization of N-alkenyl propargyl sulfonamides into pyrroles via sulfonyl migration. Inspired by these transformations and multi-substituted pyrrole synthesis, we report herein a direct synthesis of pentasubstituted pyrroles and hexasubstituted pyrrolines with all different substituents from propargyl sulfonylamides and allenamides.Previously, Zhu,¹³ Ji¹⁴ and Qiu^13b,15 reported efficient syntheses of 2-aminopyrroles from isocyanides. Ye¹⁶ and Huang¹⁷ independently developed gold-catalyzed syntheses of 2-amino-pentasubstituted pyrroles with ynamides. Despite the many advantages of these methods, they all afford protected amines, rather than free amines. The deprotection of these amines may cause problems in further transformations of the products. Our method delivers pyrroles with an unprotected free amino group and are often complementary to the previously well-developed classical methods.Initially, the cyclization reaction of N-(1,3-diphenylprop-2-yn-1-yl)-N-ethylbenzenesulfonamide (1a) with trimethylsilyl cyanide (TMSCN) was carried out with Ni(PPh₃)₂Cl₂ as a catalyst, a base (Cs₂CO₃) and DMF as a solvent. Different metal catalysts, such as Ni(PPh₃)₂Cl₂, Pd(OAc)₂, Cu(OAc)₂, and Co(OAc)₂ provided the desired product with similar yields ( EntryCat.BaseSolventYield1Ni(PPh₃)₂Cl₂Cs₂CO₃DMF67%2Pd(OAc)₂Cs₂CO₃DMF65%3Cu(OAc)₂Cs₂CO₃DMF65%4Co(OAc)₂Cs₂CO₃DMF63%5Cs₂CO₃DMF65%6KFDMFTrace7K₃PO₄DMFTrace8K₂CO₃DMF48%9KOHDMF52%10KO^tBuDMF46%11Et₃NDMFTrace12Cs₂CO₃CH₃CN18%13Cs₂CO₃DME23%14Cs₂CO₃TolueneTrace15Cs₂CO₃DCETrace16Cs₂CO₃DioxaneTraceOpen in a separate window^aReaction conditions: 1a (0.1 mmol, 1 equiv.), TMSCN (0.3 mmol, 3 equiv.), cat. (0 or 10 mol%), base (0.3 mmol, 3 equiv.) and solvent (1 mL), at 80 °C for 10 h; isolated yield.With the optimal reaction conditions in hand, we investigated the scope of this reaction. As shown in Fig. 2, the transformation tolerates a broad variety of substituted propargylamides (1). The R¹ group could be an aryl group containing either electron-donating groups or electron-withdrawing groups, and the corresponding products (2b–2h) were obtained in yields of 62–80%. The substituent R¹ could also be an alkyl group such as 1-hexyl in which case the reaction provided the corresponding pyrrole (2i) in 53% yield. Exploration of the R² substituent was also conducted. Electron-rich and electron-deficient substituents in the aromatic ring of R² gave the desired products (2j–2o) with yields of 70–81%. The product bearing a furyl group (2p) can be produced in 61% yield. However, when R² group is an aliphatic group, the reaction failed to provide the desired product. Substituent groups R³, such as benzyl (2q) or 3,4-dimethoxyphenylethyl (2r) were also compatible in the reaction, providing the corresponding products in moderate yields. Significantly, this method has the potential to produce core structures (for example 2s) similar to that in Atorvastatin. Interestingly, when alkynyl substituted isoquinolines (1t–1v) were used as the substrates, the reactions smoothly afforded fused pyrrolo[2,1-α]isoquinoline derivatives (2t–2v), members of a class of compounds that are found widely in marine alkaloids and exhibit anticancer and antiviral activity.¹⁸Open in a separate windowFig. 2Substrate scope of propargylamides. Reaction conditions: 1 (0.20 mmol, 1 equiv.), TMSCN (0.60 mmol, 3 equiv.), Cs₂CO₃ (0.60 mmol, 3 equiv.) and DMF (2 mL), at 80 °C for 10 h; isolated yield.Allenes are key intermediates in the synthesis of many complex molecules.¹⁹ As a subtype of allenes, allenamines are also useful as reaction intermediates.²⁰ Although the transformation of allenamides to multisubstituted pyrroles has not been previously recorded, this reaction probably goes through the allenamide intermediates which can be derived from propargyl sulfonamides under basic conditions. To verify this hypothesis, the trisubstituted allenamide (3) was synthesized and subjected to the standard reaction conditions. A pyrrole (2a) was isolated in 82% yield from this reaction (Fig. 3). This result confirmed our assumption and raised a new question: is it possible to build hexasubstituted pyrrolines from tetrasubstituted allenamides? A range of tetrasubstituted allenamides²¹ was tested under the standard reaction conditions, and the hexasubstituted pyrrolines were obtained as is shown in Fig. 4. The R¹ group could be an aryl substituent or an alkyl chain, and the corresponding products (5a–5e) were obtained with good yields. Various aryl groups with either electron-donating groups or electron-withdrawing groups in the aromatic ring of R² provided the desired products (5f–5k) in 62–83% yields. In addition, the difluoromethyl group can also be replaced by a phenyl group, and the reaction provided the corresponding product 5l in 82% yield. It is worth noting that these pyrroline products are not easily accessible from other methods.Open in a separate windowFig. 3Synthesis of substituted pyrroles from allenes.Open in a separate windowFig. 4Substrate scope of tetrasubstituted allenamides. Reaction conditions: 4 (0.10 mmol, 1 equiv.), TMSCN (0.30 mmol, 3 equiv.), K₂CO₃ (0.30 mmol, 3 equiv.) and DMF (1 mL), at 80 °C for 10 h, isolated yield.Some synthetic applications of this method are shown in Fig. 5. The amide is a naturally occurring and ubiquitous functional group. When using benzoyl chloride to protect the free amino group of the fully-substituted pyrrole (2a), a bis-dibenzoyl amide (6) was obtained in the presence of a base, triethylamine while the monobenzoyl protected amide (7) was obtained in the presence of pyridine as the base (Fig. 5a). This method also provides a straightforward approach to pyrrole fused lactam structures (Fig. 5b). For examples, a five-membered lactam and a six-membered lactam were generated separately in a one pot reaction, directly from, (8 and 10), respectively. Taking advantage of this method, an analogue of the drug Atorvastatin was synthesized in 5 steps (Fig. 5c), demonstrating the synthetic value of the reaction.Open in a separate windowFig. 5Synthetic applications.Mechanistic experiments were performed (Fig. 6) to explore the mechanism of the reaction. When 3 equivalents of TEMPO were added, the reaction was not inhibited and the desired product (2a) was formed in 62% yield (Fig. 6a). This result suggested that the reaction might not involve a radical process. To probe the reaction further, a kinetic study was conducted (Fig. 6b). According to this study, the propargylamide (1a) was completely converted to an allenamide (3a) in 10 min under the standard conditions. The multi-substituted pyrrole (2a) was then gradually produced from the intermediate allenamide and no other reaction intermediates were observed or identified. On the other hand, DFT calculations of substrates 3b and 4a were carried out at the B3LYP-D3(SMD)/Def2-TZVP//B3LYP-D3/Def2-SVP level of theory to identify the natural bond orbital (NBO) charges on the carbons of the allene moieties. NBO charges on the internal carbon in both 3b and 4a are 0.11 and 0.18, respectively (Fig. 6c) indicating that the nucleophilic addition of cyanide anion onto the internal carbon should be reasonable as opposed to its addition onto the terminal carbon. Pathways of the cyano addition to 3b were also calculated (Fig. 6d). The transition state of cyano addition on the internal carbon (TS1), is indeed much lower than addition on the terminal carbon (TS2). The intermediate of internal carbon addition int1, is more stable than int2, implying that the internal carbon addition pathway is not only kinetically but also thermodynamically favoured.Open in a separate windowFig. 6Mechanistic studies and proposed mechanism.Based on the results of these mechanistic studies, a plausible reaction mechanism for the synthesis of pentasubstituted pyrroles and hexasubstituted pyrrolines is proposed and is shown in Fig. 6e. First, under basic conditions, the propargylamide isomerizes to an intermediate allenamide (A), which can be attacked nucleophilically by the cyanide anion to afford an intermediate imine (B) with release of the sulfonyl group. Then, the second cyanide anion attacks the imine to form an intermediate (C), which can undergo cyclization and protonation to afford the fully substituted pyrrole (2). Similarly, the hexasubstituted pyrroline product (5) can be obtained from double nucleophilic attack of the intermediate (A) by the cyanide ion.