Copper(II), Cobalt(II), and Nickel(II) Complexes of two Novel Pyridine‐derived Macrocyclic Ligands bearing o‐ and pNitrobenzyl Pendant Groups

The pendant‐armed ligands L¹ and L² were synthesized by N‐alkylation of the four secondary amine groups of the macrocyclic precursor L using o‐nitrobenzylbromide (L¹) and p‐nitrobenzylbromide (L²). Nitrates and perchlorates of Cu^II, Ni^II and Co^II were used to synthesize the metal complexes of both ligands and the complexes were characterized by microanalysis, MS‐FAB, conductivity measurements, IR and UV‐Vis spectroscopy and magnetic studies. The crystal structures of L¹, [CuL¹](ClO₄)₂·CH₃CN·H₂O, [CuL²](ClO₄)₂·6CH₃CN, [CuL²][Cu(NO₃)₄]·5CH₃CN·0.5CH₃OH and [NiL²](ClO₄)₂·3CH₃CN·H₂O were determined by single crystal X‐ray crystallography. These structural analysis reveal the free ligand L¹, three mononuclear endomacrocyclic complexes {[CuL¹](ClO₄)₂·CH₃CN·H₂O, [CuL²](ClO₄)₂·6CH₃CN and [NiL²](ClO₄)₂·3CH₃CN·H₂O} and one binuclear complex {[CuL²][Cu(NO₃)₄]·5CH₃CN·0.5CH₃OH} in which one of the metals is in the macrocyclic framework and the other metal is outside the ligand cavity and coordinated to four nitrate ions.     

Metal Complexes with a New Tetrapyridyl Pendant Armed Macrocyclic Ligand. X‐ray Crystal Structures of CuII and NiII Complexes

A new pendant‐armed macrocyclic ligand, L¹, bearing four pyridyl pendant groups has been synthesized by N‐alkylation of the tetraazamacrocyclic precursor L with 2‐picolyl chloride hydrochloride. Metal complexes of L¹ have been synthesized and characterized by microanalysis, MS‐FAB, conductivity measurements, IR, UV‐Vis, ¹H and ¹³C NMR spectroscopy and magnetic studies. Crystal structures of the ligand L¹ as well as of the complexes [Ni₂L¹](ClO₄)₄·5CH₃CN and [Cu₂L¹](ClO₄)₄·4.5CH₃CN have been determined by single crystal X‐ray crystallography. The X ray studies show the presence of two metal atoms within the macrocyclic ligand in both metal complexes showing five coordination arrangement for the metal ions.     

Metal Complexes of New Mixed Oxaaza‐Macrocyclic Ligands. X‐Ray Crystal Structure of L1, L2, [SrL2(H2O)2](ClO4)2 and [BaL2(NCS)2(CH3CN)]·CH3CN

A new mixed oxaaza‐macrocyclic ligand, L¹, has been obtained by direct synthesis between 1,4‐bis‐(2′‐formylphenyl)‐1,4‐dioxabutane and the diamine 2,2′‐ethylenedioxydiethylamine. The dialkylated ligand L², bearing two nitrobenzyl pendant groups, has been prepared and transitional, post‐transitional and Ca²⁺, Sr²⁺, and Ba²⁺ metal complexes have been synthesized in order to elucidate the coordination preferences. The crystal structures of the ligands L¹ and L² and the complexes [SrL²(H₂O)₂](ClO₄)₂ and [BaL²(NCS)₂(CH₃CN)]·CH₃CN have been determined by single crystal X‐ray diffraction. The structures reveal the presence of mononuclear endomacrocyclic complexes where the pendant arms radiate away from the ligand.     

Synthesis,characterization, and X-ray crystal structures of metal complexes with new Schiff-base ligands and their antibacterial activities

Two new potentially hexadentate Schiff bases, [H₂L¹] and [H₂L²], were prepared by condensation of 2-(3-(2-aminophenoxy)naphthalen-2-yloxy)benzenamine with 3,5-di-tert-butyl-2-hydroxy benzaldehyde and o-vanillin, respectively. Reaction of these ligands with cobalt(II) chloride, copper(II) perchlorate, and zinc(II) nitrate gave complexes ML. The ligands and their complexes have been characterized by a variety of physico-chemical techniques. The solid and solution state investigations show that the complexes are neutral. Molecular structures of [CuL¹], [CoL¹]?·?C₇H₈, and [ZnL²]?·?CH₃CN, which have been determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction, indicate that [CuL¹] and [ZnL²]?·?CH₃CN display distorted square planar and distorted trigonal-bipyramidal geometry, respectively; the geometry around cobalt in [CoL¹]?·?C₇H₈ is almost exactly between trigonal bipyramidal and square pyramidal. The synthesized ligands and their complexes were screened for their antibacterial activities against eight bacterial strains and the ligands and complexes have antibacterial effects. The most effective ones are [CuL²] against Proteus vulgaris, Serratia marcescens, Staphylococcus subtilis, [H²L¹] against S. subtilis, and [H₂L²] against S. subtilis.     

Metallkomplexe mit N2O2S2‐Koordinationssphäre. Synthese und Charakterisierung der Cobalt(II)‐, Nickel(II)‐ und Kupfer(II)‐Komplexe eines 15‐ und eines 16‐gliedrigen N,N′‐bis(2‐hydroxyethyl)‐funktionalisierten makrocyclischen Liganden

Metal Complexes with N₂O₂S₂ Donor Set. Synthesis and Characterization of the Cobalt(II), Nickel(II), and Copper(II) Complexes of a 15‐ and a 16‐Membered Bis(2‐hydroxyethyl) Pendant Macrocyclic Ligand The macrocyclic ligands 6, 10‐bis(2‐hydroxyethyl)‐7, 8, 9, 11, 17, 18‐hexahydro‐dibenzo‐[e, n][1, 4, 8, 12]‐dithiadiaza‐cyclopentadecine ( 1 ) (L¹) and 5, 13‐bis(2‐hydroxyethyl)‐7, 8, 9, 10, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20‐nonahydro‐dibenzo‐[g, o][1, 9, 5, 13]‐dithiadiaza‐cyclohexadecine (L⁴) have been prepared. They form the stable complexes [CoL¹(‐H)CoL¹](ClO₄)₃ ( 2 ), [NiL¹](ClO₄)₂·MeOH ( 3 ), Λ‐[CuL¹](ClO₄)₂·MeOH ( 4a ) and rac‐[CuL¹](ClO₄)₂·MeOH ( 4b ), [NiL⁴](ClO₄)₂ ( 5 ), and [CuL⁴](ClO₄)₂ ( 6 ). The compounds 1 to 6 have been characterized by standard methods and single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction. In the complexes 2 to 6 the metal atoms are octahedrally coordinated by the N₂O₂S₂ donor set of the ligands. L¹ and L⁴ are folded herein along the N···M···S‐ and the N···M···N′‐axes, respectively. This results at the metal atom in a all‐cis‐configuration for the complexes of L¹ and a trans‐N₂‐cis‐O₂‐cis‐S₂‐configuration for the complexes of L⁴. The cobalt(II) complex 2 is a dimer, bridged by a rather short hydrogen bridge of 2.402(12)Å length. The copper(II) complexes of L¹ and L⁴ differ with respect to the Jahn‐Teller‐distortion.     

Synthesis and X‐Ray Single Crystal Structure of Two New Copper Complexes with the Redox Active Ligand 1,10‐Phenanthroline‐5,6‐dione

The synthesis and the crystal structures of the complexes [Cu(L^I)₂](ClO₄) ( 1 ) and [Cu(L^I)(CH₃CN)₂(ClO₄)₂] ( 2 ) are reported. 1 crystallizes in the monoclinic space group C2/c with the unit cell dimensions a = 13.169(4), b = 12.289(3), c = 14.732(3) Å, β = 109.03(2)° and Z = 4. Copper(I) is coordinated to four N atoms of the two 1,10‐Phenanthroline‐5,6‐dione (L^I) ligands with a two‐fold axis passing between the ligands. The copper(II) compound 2 crystallizes in the orthorhombic space group Pbn2₁ with unit cell dimensions of a = 7.498(5), b = 23.492(7), c = 12.363(4) Å and Z = 4. Copper(II) coordination can be described as a distorted octahedron with the N donor atoms of one L^I ligand and of two molecules of CH₃CN occupying the equatorial positions completed by two oxygen atoms of the two perchlorate molecules in the axial positions.     

Copper(II) Complexes with N,N'‐Bis(picolinidene‐N‐oxide)‐2‐hydroxy‐1, 3‐diaminopropane: Designing Binuclear Entities and Helical Chains by Versatile Ligand

Three novel copper(II) complex [Cu₂(bpa)(μ‐PhCO₂)](ClO₄)₂ ( 1 ), [Cu₂(bpa) (μ‐pyz)](ClO₄)₂ ( 2 ), and [Cu(Hbpa)](ClO₄)₂·2CH₃CN ( 3 ) have been synthesized by the reaction of Hbpa with Cu(ClO₄)₂·6H₂O in the presence and absence of exogenous ligands (where Hbpa = N, N'‐bis(picolinidene‐N‐oxide)‐2‐hydroxy‐1, 3‐diamino‐propane). Molecular structures of these compounds have been elucidated by single crystal X‐ray diffraction. 1 and 2 are both binuclear complexes in which two copper atoms are linked by the endogenous alkoxide oxygen and the exogenous benzoate and pyrazolate ligands, respectively. 3 consists of a one‐dimensional polymeric structure, in which Hbpa functions as a bridging mode.     

Crystal Structures,Magnetic Properties and Catecholase‐Like Activities of μ‐Alkoxo‐μ‐Carboxylato Double Bridged Dinuclear and Tetranuclear Copper(II) Complexes

One μ‐alkoxo‐μ‐carboxylato bridged dinuclear copper(II) complex, [Cu₂(L¹)(μ‐C₆H₅CO₂)] ( 1 )(H₃L¹ = 1,3‐bis(salicylideneamino)‐2‐propanol)), and two μ‐alkoxo‐μ‐dicarboxylato doubly‐bridged tetranuclear copper(II) complexes, [Cu₄(L¹)₂(μ‐C₈H₁₀O₄)(DMF)₂]·H₂O ( 2 ) and [Cu₄(L²)₂(μ‐C₅H₆O₄]·2H₂O·2CH₃CN ( 3 ) (H₃L² = 1,3‐bis(5‐bromo‐salicylideneamino)‐2‐propanol)) have been prepared and characterized. The single crystal X‐ray analysis shows that the structure of complex 1 is dimeric with two adjacent copper(II) atoms bridged by μ‐alkoxo‐μ‐carboxylato ligands where the Cu···Cu distances and Cu‐O(alkoxo)‐Cu angles are 3.5 11 Å and 132.8°, respectively. Complexes 2 and 3 consist of a μ‐alkoxo‐μ‐dicarboxylato doubly‐bridged tetranuclear Cu(II) complex with mean Cu‐Cu distances and Cu‐O‐Cu angles of 3.092 Å and 104.2° for 2 and 3.486 Å and 129.9° for 3 , respectively. Magnetic measurements reveal that 1 is strong antiferromagnetically coupled with 2J =‐210 cm^?1 while 2 and 3 exhibit ferromagnetic coupling with 2J = 126 cm^?1 and 82 cm^?1 (averaged), respectively. The 2J values of 1–3 are correlated to dihedral angles and the Cu‐O‐Cu angles. Dependence of the pH at 25 °C on the reaction rate of oxidation of 3,5‐di‐tert‐butylcatechol (3,5‐DTBC) to the corresponding quinone (3,5‐DTBQ) catalyzed by 1–3 was studied. Complexes 1–3 exhibit catecholase‐like active at above pH 8 and 25 °C for oxidation of 3,5‐di‐tert‐butylcatechol.     

Synthesis,Crystal Structure and Spectroscopic Properties of [2,13‐Bis(1‐naphthalenylmethyl)‐5,16‐dimethyl‐2,6,13,17‐tetraazatricyclo(14,4,01.18,07.12)docosane]copper(II) Diperchlorate Acetonitrile Disolvate

The N‐functionalized macrocyclic ligand 2,13‐bis(1‐naphthalenylmethyl)‐5,16‐dimethyl‐2,6,13,17‐tetraazatricyclo(14,4,0^1.18,0^7.12)docosane (L³) and its copper(II) complex were prepared. The crystal structure of [Cu(L³)](ClO₄)₂·2CH₃CN was determined by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction at 150 K. The copper atom, which lies on an inversion centre, has a square planar arrangement and the complex adopts a stable trans‐III configuration. The longer distance [2.081(2) Å] for Cu–N(tertiary) compared to 2.030(3) Å for Cu–N(secondary) may be due to the steric effect of the attached naphthalenylmethyl group on the tertiary nitrogen atom. Two perchlorate ions are weakly attached to copper in axial sites and are further connected to the ligand of the cation through NH ··· O hydrogen bonds [N ··· O 3.098 Å]. IR and UV/Vis spectroscopic properties are also described.     

Synthesis, Spectroscopic and Electrochemical Investigations of Two vic-Dioximes and Their Mononuclear Ni（Ⅱ）, Cu（Ⅱ） and Co（Ⅱ） Metal Complexes Containing Morpholine Group

Two vic-dioxime ligands （LxH2） containing morpholine group have been synthesized from 4-[2-（dimethylaminoethyl）] morpholine with anti-phenylchloroglyoxime or anti-monochloroglyoxime in absolute THF at -15 ℃. Reaction of two vic-dioxime ligands with MCl2·nH2O （M： Ni, Cu or Co and n=2 or 6） salts in 1 ： 2 molar ratio afforded metal complexes of type [M（LxH）2] or [M（LxH）2·2H2O]. All of metal complexes are non-electrolytes as shown by their molar conductivities （Am） in DMF （dimethyl formamide） at 10^-3 mol·L^-1. Structures of the ligands and metal complexes have been solved by elemental analyses, FT-IR, UV-Vis, ^1H NMR and ^13C NMR, magnetic susceptibility measurements, molar conductivity measurements. Furthermore, redox properties of the metal complexes were investigated by cyclic voltammetry.     

Amide‐Functionalized Naphthyridines on a RhII–RhII Platform: Effect of Steric Crowding,Hemilability, and Hydrogen‐Bonding Interactions on the Structural Diversity and Catalytic Activity of Dirhodium(II) Complexes

Ferrocene‐amide‐functionalized 1,8‐naphthyridine (NP) based ligands {[(5,7‐dimethyl‐1,8‐naphthyridin‐2‐yl)amino]carbonyl}ferrocene (L¹H) and {[(3‐phenyl‐1,8‐naphthyridin‐2‐yl)amino]carbonyl}ferrocene (L²H) have been synthesized. Room‐temperature treatment of both the ligands with Rh₂(CH₃COO)₄ produced [Rh₂(CH₃COO)₃(L¹)] ( 1 ) and [Rh₂(CH₃COO)₃(L²)] ( 2 ) as neutral complexes in which the ligands were deprotonated and bound in a tridentate fashion. The steric effect of the ortho‐methyl group in L¹H and the inertness of the bridging carboxylate groups prevented the incorporation of the second ligand on the {Rh^II–Rh^II} unit. The use of the more labile Rh₂(CF₃COO)₄ salt with L¹H produced a cis bis‐adduct [Rh₂(CF₃COO)₄(L¹H)²] ( 3 ), whereas L²H resulted in a trans bis‐adduct [Rh₂(CF₃COO)₃(L²)(L²H)] ( 4 ). Ligand L¹H exhibits chelate binding in 3 and L²H forms a bridge‐chelate mode in 4 . Hydrogen‐bonding interactions between the amide hydrogen and carboxylate oxygen atoms play an important role in the formation of these complexes. In the absence of this hydrogen‐bonding interaction, both ligands bind axially as evident from the X‐ray structure of [Rh₂(CH₃COO)₂(CH₃CN)₄(L²H)₂](BF₄)₂ ( 6 ). However, the axial ligands reorganize at reflux into a bridge‐chelate coordination mode and produce [Rh₂(CH₃COO)₂(CH₃CN)₂(L¹H)](BF₄)₂ ( 5 ) and [Rh₂(CH₃COO)₂(L²H)₂](BF₄)₂ ( 7 ). Judicious selection of the dirhodium(II) precursors, choice of ligand, and adaptation of the correct reaction conditions affords 7 , which features hemilabile amide side arms that occupy sites trans to the Rh–Rh bond. Consequently, this compound exhibits higher catalytic activity for carbene insertion to the C?H bond of substituted indoles by using appropriate diazo compounds, whereas other compounds are far less reactive. Thus, this work demonstrates the utility of steric crowding, hemilability, and hydrogen‐bonding functionalities to govern the structure and catalytic efficacyof dirhodium(II,II) compounds.     

Altering the Activity of Catechol Oxidase Model Compounds by Electronic Influence on the Copper Core

The catecholase activity of the dicopper(II) complexes [Cu₂(L¹)(μ‐OCH₃)(NCCH₃)₂](PF₆)₂·H₂O·CH₃CN ( 1 ), [Cu₂(L²)(μ‐OH)(MeOH)(NCCH₃)](BF₄)₂ ( 2 ), [Cu₂(L³)(μ‐OMe)(NCCH₃)₂](BF₄)₂·2CH₃CN·H₂O ( 3 ), [Cu₂(L²)(μ‐OAc)₂]BF₄·H₂O ( 4 ), [Cu₂(L⁴)(μ‐OAc)₂]ClO₄ ( 5 ) and [Cu₂(L⁵)(μ‐OMe)(NCCH₃)₃(OH₂)](ClO₄)₂·2CH₃OH·CH₃CN ( 6 ) consisting of varying para‐substituted phenol ligands HL¹ = 4‐trifluoromethyl‐2,6‐bis((4‐methylpiperazin‐1‐yl)methyl)phenol, HL² = 4‐bromo‐2,6‐bis((4‐methyl‐1,4‐diazepan‐1‐yl)methyl)phenol, HL³ = 4‐bromo‐2‐((4‐methyl‐1,4‐diazepan‐1‐yl)methyl)‐6‐((4‐methylpiperazin‐1‐yl)methyl)phenol, HL⁴ = 2,6‐bis((4‐methylpiperazin‐1‐yl)methyl)‐4‐nitrophenol and HL⁵ = 4‐tert‐butyl‐2,6‐bis((4‐methylpiperazin‐1‐yl)methyl)phenol was studied. The main difference within the six complexes lies in the individual copper–copper separation that is enforced by the chelating side arms of the phenolate ligand entity and more importantly in the exogenous bridging solvent, hydroxide, methanolate or acetate ions. The distance between the copper cores varies from 2.94Å in 1 to 3.29Å in 5 . The catalytic activity of the complexes 1 – 6 towards the oxidation of 3,5‐di‐tert‐butylcatechol was determined spectrophotometrically by monitoring the increase of the 3,5–di‐tert‐butylquinone characteristic absorption band at about 400 nm over time saturated with O₂. The complexes are able to oxidize the substrate 3,5‐di‐tert‐butylcatechol to the corresponding o‐quinone with distinct catalytic activity (k_cat between 92 h^?1 and 189 h^?1), with an order of decreasing activity 6 > 5 > 1 , 2 , 4 ≥ 3 . A kinetic treatment of the data based on the Michaelis‐Menten approach was applied. A correlation of the catecholase activities with the variation of the para‐ substituents as well as other effects resulting from the copper core distances is discussed. [Cu₂(L⁵)(μ‐OMe)(NCCH₃)₃(OH)₂](ClO₄)₂·2CH₃OH·CH₃CN ( 6 ) exhibited the highest activity of the six complexes as a result of its high turnover rate.     

Copper(II) and Cadmium(II) Complexes Based on N,N‐Bis(3, 5‐dimethyl‐2‐hydroxybenzyl)‐N‐(2‐pyridylmethyl)amine Ligand: Syntheses,Structures, Magnetic,and Luminescent Properties

The reaction of the aryl‐oxide ligand H₂L [H₂L = N,N‐bis(3, 5‐dimethyl‐2‐hydroxybenzyl)‐N‐(2‐pyridylmethyl)amine] with CuSO₄ · 5H₂O, CuCl₂ · 2H₂O, CuBr₂, CdCl₂ · 2.5H₂O, and Cd(OAc)₂ · 2H₂O, respectively, under hydrothermal conditions gave the complexes [Cu(H₂L¹)₂] · SO₄ · 3CH₃OH ( 1 ), [Cu₂(H₂L²)₂Cl₄] ( 2 ), [Cu₂(H₂L²)₂Br₄] ( 3 ), [Cd₂(HL)₂Cl₂] ( 4 ), and [Cd₂(L)₂(CH₃COOH)₂] · H₂L ( 5 ), where H₂L¹ [H₂L¹ = 2, 4‐dimethyl‐6‐((pyridin‐2‐ylmethylamino)methyl)phenol] and H₂L² [H₂L² = 2‐(2, 4‐dimethyl‐6‐((pyridin‐2‐ylmethylamino)methyl)phenoxy)‐4, 6‐dimethylphenol] were derived from the solvothermal in situ metal/ligand reactions. These complexes were characterized by IR spectroscopy, elementary analysis, and X‐ray diffraction. A low‐temperature magnetic susceptibility measurement for the solid sample of 2 revealed antiferromagnetic interactions between two central copper(II) atoms. The emission property studies for complexes 4 and 5 indicated strong luminescence emission.     

Syntheses and structures of one CuI‐containing coordination polymer and two macrocyclic supramolecular complexes based on flexible 1,3,4‐oxadiazole‐containing ligands

Three coordination complexes with Cu^I centres have been prepared using the symmetrical flexible organic ligands 1,3‐bis{[5‐(quinolin‐2‐yl)‐1,3,4‐oxadiazol‐2‐yl]sulfanyl}propane (L1) and 1,4‐bis{[5‐(quinolin‐2‐yl)‐1,3,4‐oxadiazol‐2‐yl]sulfanyl}butane (L2). Crystallization of L1 with Cu(SO₃CF₃)₂ and of L2 with Cu(BF₄)₂ and Cu(ClO₄)₂ in a CH₂Cl₂/CH₃OH mixed‐solvent system at room temperature afforded the coordination complexes catena‐poly[[copper(I)‐μ‐1,3‐bis{[5‐(quinolin‐2‐yl)‐1,3,4‐oxadiazol‐2‐yl]sulfanyl}propane] methanesulfonate dichloromethane 0.6‐solvate], {[Cu(C₂₅H₁₈N₆O₂S₂)](CF₃SO₃)·0.6CH₂Cl₂}_n, (I), bis(μ‐1,4‐bis{[5‐(quinolin‐2‐yl)‐1,3,4‐oxadiazol‐2‐yl]sulfanyl}butane)dicopper(I) bis(tetrafluoridoborate)–dichloromethane–methanol (1/1.5/1), [Cu₂(C₂₆H₂₀N₆O₂S₂)₂](BF₄)₂·1.5CH₂Cl₂·CH₃OH, (II), and bis(μ‐1,4‐bis{[5‐(quinolin‐2‐yl)‐1,3,4‐oxadiazol‐2‐yl]sulfanyl}butane)dicopper(I) bis(perchlorate)–dichloromethane–methanol (1/2/1), [Cu₂(C₂₆H₂₀N₆O₂S₂)₂](ClO₄)₂·2CH₂Cl₂·CH₃OH, (III). Under the control of the dumbbell‐shaped CF₃SO₃⁻ anion, complex (I) forms a one‐dimensional chain and neighbouring chains form a spiral double chain. Under the control of the regular tetrahedron‐shaped BF₄⁻ and ClO₄⁻ anions, complexes (II) and (III) have been obtained as bimetallic rings, which further interact viaπ–π interactions to form two‐dimensional networks. The anions play a decisive role in determining the arrangement of these discrete molecular complexes in the solid state.     

新的杯[4]芳烃衍生物通过缔合乙腈进行自插入的X-射线衍射和密度泛函理论研究

合成和表征了一个新的杯[4]芳烃衍生物，11,23-二羟亚胺甲基-25,27-二羟基-26,28-二丙氧基杯[4]芳烃 (B)及其与乙腈生成的组成为B·2CH₃CN的化合物。¹H NMR显示，在B·2CH₃CN中B采取锥型构象，X-射线衍射分析确证在溶液中所发现的构象。在晶格网络中存在着B·2CH₃CN以二聚体形式的自插入现象。在B3LYP/6-311G(d)水平上计算了该自插入二聚体中的非共价相互作用能，并对基集叠加误差进行了校正。在二聚体中的B·2CH₃CN，一个CH₃CN通过与羟亚胺基形成氢键使之稳定，结合能为–5.02 kJ·mol^-1，另一个CH₃CN则通过与另一个羟亚胺基形成氢键以及与另一B·2CH₃CN中B苯环空腔间的C–H···π相互作用使之稳定，结合能分别为–14.23 kJ·mol^-1和–3.77 kJ·mol^-1。自插入的驱动能为–7.54 kJ·mol^-1。     

Synthesis and Characterization of β‐Diketiminate Aluminum Compounds and Their Use in the Ring‐Opening Polymerization of ε‐Caprolactone

Four aluminum alkyl compounds, [CH{(CH₃)CN‐2,4,6‐MeC₆H₂}₂AlMe₂] ( 1 ), [CH{(CH₃)CN‐2,4,6‐MeC₆H₂}₂AlEt₂] ( 2 ), [CH{(CH₃)CN‐2‐iPrC₆H₄}₂AlMe₂] ( 3 ), and [CH{(CH₃)CN‐2‐iPrC₆H₄}₂AlEt₂] ( 4 ), bearing β‐diketiminate ligands [CH{(Me)CN‐2,4,6‐MeC₆H₂}]₂ (L¹H) and [CH{(Me)CN‐2‐ⁱPrC₆H₄}]₂ (L²H) were obtained from the reactions of trimethylaluminum, triethylaluminum with the corresponding β‐diketiminate, respectively. All compounds were characterized by ¹H NMR and ¹³C NMR spectroscopy, single‐crystal X‐ray structural analysis, and elemental analysis. Compounds 1 – 4 were found to catalyze the ring‐opening polymerization (ROP) of ε‐caprolactone (ε‐CL) with good activity.     

Influence of structural variation of salamo‐based ligand on supramolecular architectures,Hirshfeld analyses,and fluorescence properties of new tetranuclear NiII complexes

Two new tetranuclear Ni^II complexes, [Ni₄(L¹)₂(N₃)₄(MeOH)₂]·CH₃COCH₃ (1) and [Ni₄(L²)₂(N₃)₄(MeOH)₂]·4CH₃COCH₃ (2) , were synthesized using NiCl₂·6H₂O, NaN₃, and asymmetric salamo‐based ligands H₂L¹ and H₂L², respectively. The structural characterization was made by elemental analyses, infrared (IR) and ultraviolet‐visible (UV‐vis) spectra, and X‐ray diffraction analyses. The results of X‐ray diffraction analyses show that the Ni^II atoms in complexes 1 and 2 are distorted octahedral geometries. Interestingly, the degree of distortion of the ligands in complexes 1 and 2 is different, which indicates that the interaction of Ni^II ions on different ligands is different. Meanwhile, the investigation of molecular packing by employing the Hirshfeld surface analysis exhibits that the percentages of C–H/H–C, O–H/H–O, and H–H/H–H contacts of the complex 1 (or 2 ) are calculated to be 17.7%, 7.9%, and 53.7% (or 18.8%, 13.8%, and 52.5%), respectively, where the H–H/H–H contacts have the characteristics of strong contacts whereas the O–H/H–O hydrogen bonds are considerably weak, and the studies on fluorescence properties further confirm the Ni^II atoms have different binding abilities to the different ligands.     

Synthesis,Crystal Structure,and Characterization of Two Novel Five‐coordinate Zinc(II) Complexes with the Tripod Ligand Tris(N‐methylbenzimidazol‐2‐yl‐methyl)amine and α,β‐unsaturated Carboxylates

Two novel five‐coordinate zinc(II) complexes with the tripod ligand tris(N‐methylbenzimidazol‐2‐ylmethyl)amine (Mentb) and two different α,β‐unsaturated carboxylates, with the composition [Zn(Mentb)(acrylate)] (ClO₄)·DMF·1.5CH₃OH ( 1 ) and [Zn(Mentb)(cinnamate)](ClO₄)·2DMF·0.5CH₃OH ( 2 ), were synthesized and characterized by means of elemental analyses, electrical conductivity measurements, IR, UV, and ¹H NMR spectra. The crystal structure of two complexes have been determined by a single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction method, and show that the Zn^II atom is bonded to a Mentb ligand and a α,β‐unsaturated carboxylate molecule through four N atoms and one O atom, resulting in a distorted trigonal‐bipyramidal coordination [τ( 1 ) = 0.853, τ( 2 ) = 0.855], with approximate C₃ symmetry.     

Co‐MOFs Containing Flexible α,ω‐Alkane‐dicarboxylates and Bis(imidazole) Ligands: Synthesis,Structure, and Properties

Three structurally related flexible bis(imidazole) ligands reacted with Co(NO₃)₂ · 6H₂O and succinic acid (L₁) to yield three new metal‐organic frameworks {[Co(L₁)(L₂)] · (H₂O)}_n ( 1 ) [L₂ = 2‐bis(imidazol‐1‐yl)ethane], {[Co(L₁)(L₃)](H₂O)}_n ( 2 ) [L₃ = 1,4‐bis(imidazol‐1‐yl) butane], and {[Co(L₁)(L₄)] · (H₂O)}_n ( 3 ) [L₄ = 1,4‐bis(2‐methyl‐imidazol‐1‐yl)butane], respectively. These complexes were synthesized under solvothermal conditions and characterized by elemental analysis, IR spectroscopy, single‐crystal and powder X‐ray diffraction, as well as thermal analyses. Interestingly, the ligands in these complexes exhibit different conformations and further cause three different configurations. Complex 1 shows a three‐dimensional (3D) framework, which is connected by two‐dimensional (2D) layer structures through hydrogen bonds. Complex 2 is a diamond structure with threefold interpenetration. Complex 3 is a 3D framework linked by hydrogen bonds like complex 1 .     

Anion‐directed Silver(I) Coordination Assemblies Based on 1‐(2‐Pyridyl)‐2‐(4‐pyridyl)‐1,2,4‐triazolewith Diverse Supramolecular Networks and Dichromate Removal Capabilities

A series of silver(I) supramolecular complexes, namely, {[Ag(L²⁴)](NO₃)}_n ( 1 ), [Ag₂(L²⁴)(NO₂)₂]_n ( 2 ), and {[Ag_1.25(L²⁴)(DMF)](PF₆)_1.25}_n ( 3 ) were prepared by the reactions of 1‐(2‐pyridyl)‐2‐(4‐pyridyl)‐1,2,4‐triazole (L²⁴) and silver(I) salts with different anions (AgNO₃, AgNO₂, AgPF₆). Single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction indicates that 1 – 3 display diverse supramolecular networks. The structure of dinuclear complex 1 is composed of a six‐membered Ag₂N₄ ring with the Ag ··· Ag distance of 4.4137(3) Å. In complex 2 , the adjacent Ag^I centers are interlinked by L²⁴ ligands into a 1D chain, the adjacent of which are further extended by the bridged nitrites to construct a 2D coordination architecture. Complex 3 shows a 3D (3,4)‐connected framework, which is generated by the linkage of L²⁴ ligands. All complexes were characterized by IR spectra, elemental analysis, and powder X‐ray diffraction. Notably, a structural comparison of the complexes demonstrates that their structures are predominated by the nature of anions. Additionally, 1 and 2 show efficient dichromate (Cr₂O₇^2–) capture in water system, which can be ascribed to the anion‐exchange.