Hydroboration of Alkenes and Alkynes with Aza‐nido‐decaboranes

The 6‐aza‐nido‐decaboranes RNB₉H₁₁ ( 1a—d ; R = H, Ph, 4‐C₆H₄Me, 4‐C₆H₄Cl) act as 1, 2‐hydroboration agents via their 9‐BH vertex, giving products RNB₉H₁₀R′. The boranes 1a, b and 3‐hexyne yield the 9‐(1‐ethyl‐1‐butenyl)‐6‐aza‐nido‐decaboranes 2a, b (R′ = CEt = CHEt). 2, 3‐Dimethyl‐2‐butene is hydroborated by 1a—d under formation of the 9‐(1, 1, 2‐trimethylpropyl)‐6‐aza‐nido‐decaboranes 3a—d (R′ = —CMe₂ —CHMe₂). With the boranes 1a—c and (trimethylsilyl)ethene, a 85:15 mixture of the products (RNB₉H₁₀)CH₂CH₂(SiMe₃)( 4a—c ) and their chiral isomers (RNB₉H₁₀)CH(SiMe₃)CH₃ ( 5a—c ) is obtained. The action of BH₃(SMe₂) on the mixtures 4b/5b or 4c/5c results in a closure of the nido‐NB₉ skeleton of 4b or 4c , respectively, with a closo‐NB₁₁ skeleton of the products RNB₁₁H₁₀R′ ( 6b or 6c;R′ = CH₂CH₂(SiMe₃)); R′ is found in position 7 of 6b, c . All products of the type 2—6 are characterised by NMR.     

nido‐Undecaboranes and ‐borates of the Type B11H13L and B11H12L‐

The Lewis base SMe₂ in 7‐B₁₁H₁₃(SMe₂) ( 1a ) can be replaced by the amines L = NH₂(CH₂tBu), NH₂Cy, NH₂Ph, NH₂(4‐C₆H₄Me), py, chinoline or the phosphanes L = PPh₃, PMePh₂, yielding 7‐B₁₁H₁₃L ( 1b ‐ i ). The borane 1a can be deprotonated by certain amines, alkanides, or hydrides to give the anion 7‐B₁₁H₁₂(SMe₂)^‐ ( 2a ). Replacing the base SMe₂ in the anion 2a by weak bases gives B₁₁H₁₂L^‐ (L = PPh₃, MeCN; 2h , j ). Upon reaction of 1a with the amine NH₂(CH₂tBu) in the ratio 1:2, a deprotonation and the substitution of SMe₂ by the amine are observed, 7‐B₁₁H₁₂[NH₂(CH₂tBu)]^‐ ( 2b ) being formed. At 170 °C, the 7‐isomers 1b , f are isomerized into a mixture of the corresponding 1‐ and 2‐isomers ( 1b′ , f′ and 1b″ , f″ , respectively).     

Undecahalo‐closo‐undecaborates [B11Hal11]2–

The closo‐undecaborate A₂[B₁₁H₁₁] (A = NBzlEt₃) can be halogenated with excess N‐chlorosuccine imide, bromine or iodine, respectively, to give the perhalo‐closo‐undecaborates A₂[B₁₁Hal₁₁] (Hal = Cl, Br, I). The chlorination in the 11 : 1 ratio of the reagents yields A₂[B₁₁HCl₁₀], whose subsequent iodination makes A₂[B₁₁Cl₁₀I] available. The three type [B₁₁Hal₁₁]^2– anions show only one and the two type [B₁₁Cl₁₀X]^2– anions (X = H, I) only two ¹¹B NMR peaks in the ratio 10 : 1, thus exhibiting the same degenerate rearrangement of the octadecahedral B₁₁ skeleton as is well‐known for [B₁₁H₁₁]^2–. The crystal structure analysis of A₂[B₁₁Br₁₁] and A₂[B₁₁I₁₁] reveals a rigid octadecahedral skeleton in the solid state, up to 330 K, whose B–B bond lengths deviate more or less from the idealized C_2v gas phase structure, but are in good accordance with the distances of A₂[B₁₁H₁₁]. Electrochemical experiments elucidate the mechanism of the known oxidation of [B₁₁H₁₁]^2– to give [B₂₂H₂₂]^2–: A first one‐electron transfer is followed by the dimerization of the [B₁₁H₁₁]^– monoanion, whereas neutral B₁₁H₁₁, a presumably most reactive species, does not play a role as an intermediate. The electrochemical oxidation of [B₁₁Hal₁₁]^2– anions also starts with a one‐electron transfer, which is perfectly reversible only in the case of Hal = Br. There is no electrochemical indication for the formation of [B₂₂Hal₂₂]^2–. The neutral species B₁₁Hal₁₁ should be a short‐lived, very reactive species.     

1‐Oxa‐nido‐dodecaborate [OB11H12]− from the Controlled Oxidation of the closo‐Borates [B11H11]2− and [B12H12]2−

The closo‐dodecaborate [B₁₂H₁₂]^2? is degraded at room temperature by oxygen in an acidic aqueous solution in the course of several weeks to give B(OH)₃. The degradation is induced by Ag²⁺ ions, generated from Ag⁺ by the action of H₂S₂O₈. Oxa‐nido‐dodecaborate(1?) is an intermediate anion, that can be separated from the reaction mixture as [NBzlEt₃][OB₁₁H₁₂] after five days in a yield of 18 %. The action of FeCl₃ on the closo‐undecaborate [B₁₁H₁₁]^2? in an aqueous solution gives either [B₂₂H₂₂]^2? (by fusion) or nido‐B₁₁H₁₃(OH)^? (by protonation and hydration), depending on the concentration of FeCl₃. In acetonitrile, however, [B₁₁H₁₁]^2? is transformed into [OB₁₁H₁₂]^? by Fe³⁺ and oxygen. The radical anions [B₁₂H₁₂] ^{˙ ?} and [B₁₁H₁₁] ^{˙ ?} are assumed to be the primary products of the oxidation with the one‐electron oxidants Ag²⁺ and Fe³⁺, respectively. These radical anions are subsequently transformed into [OB₁₁H₁₂]^? by oxygen. The crystal structure analysis shows that the structure of [OB₁₁H₁₂]^? is derived from the hypothetical closo‐oxaborane OB₁₂H₁₂ by removal of the B3 vertex, leaving a non‐planar pentagonal aperture with a three‐coordinate O vertex, as predicted by NMR spectra and theory.     

Na6[B18Se17]: The First Selenoborato‐closo‐dodecaborate with a Polymeric Chain Anion

Systematic studies on selenoborates containing a B₁₂ cluster entity and alkali metal cations led to the new crystalline phase Na₆[B₁₈Se₁₇] which consists of a icosahedral B₁₂ cluster completely saturated with trigonal‐planar BSe₃ units and sodium counter‐ions. Neighbouring cluster entities are connected in one direction via exocyclic selenium atoms forming the infinite chain anion ([B₁₈Se₁₆Se_2/2]^6–)_∞. The new chalcogenoborate was prepared in a solid state reaction from sodium selenide, amorphous boron and selenium in evacuated carbon coated silica tubes at a temperature of 850 °C. Na₆[B₁₈Se₁₇] crystallizes in the monoclinic space group C2/c (no. 15) with a = 18.005(4) Å, b = 16.549(3) Å, c = 11.245(2) Å, β = 91.35(3)° and Z = 4.     

1‐Amino‐2‐fluoromonocarba‐closo‐dodecaborates: K[1‐H2N‐2‐F‐closo‐1‐CB11H10] and [Et4N][1‐H2N‐2‐F‐closo‐1‐CB11I10]

The potassium salt of the [1‐H₂N‐2‐F‐closo‐1‐CB₁₁H₁₀]^– anion ( 1 ) was obtained from an insertion reaction of Li₃[7‐H₂N‐nido‐7‐CB₁₀H₁₀] with BF₃ · OEt₂. Anion 1 was protonated to the neutral species 1‐H₃N‐2‐F‐closo‐1‐CB₁₁H₁₀ (H 1 ) and it was iodinated with ICl to the [1‐H₂N‐2‐F‐closo‐1‐CB₁₁I₁₀]^– anion ( 2 ). All species were characterized by multinuclear NMR, IR, and Raman spectroscopy as well as by elemental analysis. The structure of H 1· (CH₃)₂CO was studied by single‐crystal X‐ray diffraction and the experimentally determined bond lengths are compared to values derived from density functional calculations.     

Dodecahydro‐closo‐undecaborate [B11H12]–

DFT‐calculations of the geometries of the closo‐anion [B₁₁H₁₁]^2– in its ground state and in the transition state of its skeletal rearrangement and of the protonated species [B₁₁H₁₂]^– in its ground state were performed at the B3LYP/6‐31++G(d,p) level. The corresponding NMR shifts were computed on the basis of the optimized geometry by the GIAO method at the same level. Calculated and observed NMR data are in good agreement and thus prove the structure of [B₁₁H₁₂]^–, previously deduced from 2 D‐NMR spectra. The addition of water, ethanol, and pyridine to [B₁₁H₁₂]^– at low temperature gave the nido‐species [B₁₁H₁₃(OH)]^–, [B₁₁H₁₃(OEt)]^–, and [B₁₁H₁₂(py)]^–, respectively. The structures of these anions were investigated by NMR methods and the last two of them by crystal structure analyses of appropriate salts. The course of the addition reactions can be rationalized on the basis of the structurally characterized reaction components.     

Solution Mediated Synthesis and Structure of the First Anionic Bis‐( hexaborato)‐Zincate Prepared in the Presence of an Organic Amine

A room temperature reaction of zinc acetate, tributyl borate and N, N, N′N′‐tetramethylethylenediamine (tmen) in a mixture of water and 1‐butanol has given rise to a new bis‐(hexaborato)‐zincate, [(Me)₂NH(CH₂)₂NH(Me)₂][{Zn(B₆O₇(OH)₆}₂]·2H₂O ( I ). The structure, determined by single crystal X‐ray diffraction, (P1, a = 8.3014(2), b = 9.2489(2), c = 10.442(2)Å, α = 107.71(3), β = 94.22(3), γ = 100.02(3)°, V = 749.6(3)Å^{3 =} Z = 1, R₁ = 0.0387, wR₂ = 0.105), consists of anionic molecular Zn hexaborate units forming a herringbone arrangement, through strong hydrogen bond interactions, with the amine molecule situated between the chains. Compound I is the first bis‐(hexaborato)‐zincate, to our knowledge, that has been synthesized in the presence of an organic amine.     

Relative Stability of closo‐closo,closo‐nido,and nido‐nido Macropolyhedral Boranes: The Role of Orbital Compatibility

The concept of orbital compatibility is used to explain the relative energies of different macropolyhedral structural patterns such as closo‐closo, closo‐nido, and nido‐nido. A large polyhedral borane condenses preferentially with a smaller polyhedron owing to orbital compatibility. Calculations carried out at the B3LYP/6‐31G* level show that the macropolyhedron closo(12)‐closo(6) is the most preferred structural pattern among the face‐sharing closo‐closo systems. The relative stabilities of four‐shared‐atom closo‐closo, three‐shared‐atom closo‐closo, three‐shared‐atom closo‐nido, edge‐sharing closo‐nido, and edge‐sharing nido‐nido structures are in accordance with the difference in the number of vertices of the individual polyhedra of the macropolyhedra. When the difference in the number of vertices of the individual polyhedra is large, the stability of the macropolyhedra is also large. Calculations further show that the orbital compatibility plays an important role in deciding the stability of the macropolyhedral boranes with more than two polyhedral units. The dependence of the orbital compatibility on the relative stability of the macropolyhedron varies with other factors such as inherent stability of the individual polyhedron and steric factors.     

An Alternative Method for the Preparation of Diphenylboron Chelates. The Crystal and Molecular Structures of (Pyridine‐2‐acetyloximato)diphenylboron and (1‐Phenylazo‐2‐naphtholato)diphenylboron

A convenient method for the preparation of diphenylboron chelates from ammonium tetraphenylborate is described. A variety of five‐ or six‐membered O,O‐, N,O‐ and N,N‐chelates were obtained in yields from 60 to 90 %. The isolated compounds were characterized by elemental analysis, IR spectroscopy and multinuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (¹H, ¹³C, and ¹¹B). The crystal and molecular structures of (pyridine‐2‐acetyloximato)diphenylboron and (1‐phenylazo‐2‐naphtholato)diphenylboron were determined by X‐ray diffraction on single crystals.     

ChemInform Abstract: Relative Stability of closo‐closo,closo‐nido,and nido‐nido Macropolyhedral Boranes: The Role of Orbital Compatibility

ChemInform is a weekly Abstracting Service, delivering concise information at a glance that was extracted from about 200 leading journals. To access a ChemInform Abstract of an article which was published elsewhere, please select a “Full Text” option. The original article is trackable via the “References” option.     

BF2‐Chelate Complexes of 6‐(4‐Iodophenyl)‐2,3,4,8,9,10‐hexamethyldipyrrin and 2‐(4‐Iodobenzoyl)‐3,4,5‐trimethylpyrrole: Fluorescent Dyes with a Chemical Anchor Group

The one‐pot condensation/coordination reaction of 4‐iodobenzoylchloride, 2,3,4‐trimethylpyrrole and BF₃ × Et₂O yields the BF₂ chelate complexes of the 1:1 condensation product 2‐(4‐iodobenzoyl)‐3,4,5‐trimethylpyrrole and of the 1:2 product 6‐(4‐iodophenyl)‐2,3,4,8,9,10‐hexamethyldipyrrin, as separable compounds in 6 and 38 % yield, respectively. Both new boron derivatives are fluorescent already upon exitation with ambient light. While the fluorescence quantum yield of the benzoyl derivative is very low, this value is significantly higher for the related boron dipyrrin (BODIPY) derivative. Single crystal X‐ray diffraction studies of both compounds reveal that the reason for these deviating physical properties are structural in nature. For the BODIPY an essentially flat structure of the fluorophor has been established, in addition to restricted rotation of the 4‐iodophenyl substituent, so that no conformational dynamic facilitates radiationless deactivations. The 1:1 condensation product on the other hand allows a fast equilibration of the photophysical exitation by dynamic processes and therefore exhibits a low fluorescence quantum yield. Both luminophores contain an iodoaryl moiety with potential uses for further functionalization and bioconjugation.     

μ‐Phthalocyaninato‐bis(triphenylphosphinoxidnatrium): Synthese und Kristallstruktur

μ‐Phthalocyaninato‐bis({triphenylphosphine oxide}sodium): Synthesis and Crystal Structure Blue μ‐phthalocyaninato‐bis({triphenylphosphine oxide}sodium) ( 1 ) is prepared by heating triphenylphosphine oxide with disodium phthalocyaninate at 160 °C. 1 is centrosymmetric (space group P1). The Na atom is located in a tetragonal pyramid co‐ordinating four isoindole N atoms at a distance varying between 2.409(2) and 2.438(2) Å, and one O atom at 2.198(2) Å. The Na–Na distance is 2.823(5) Å, and the Na–O–P angle is 145.5(1)°.     

[2+4] and [2+2] Cycloaddition Reactions of N‐Sulfinyl Carboxylic Acid Amides with (CF3)2BNMe2. Crystal Structure of cyclo‐(CF3)2B‐NMe2‐S(=O)‐N=C(p‐CH3C6H4)‐O

N‐sulfinylacylamides R‐C(=O)‐N=S=O react with (CF₃)₂BNMe₂ ( 1 ) to form, by [2+4] cycloaddition, six‐membered rings cyclo‐(CF₃)₂B‐NMe₂‐S(=O)‐N=C(R)‐O for R = Me ( 2 ), t‐Bu ( 3 ), C₆H₅ ( 4 ), and p‐CH₃C₆H₄ ( 5 ) while N‐sulfinylcarbamic acid esters R‐O‐C(=O)‐N=S=O react with 1 to yield mixtures of six‐membered (cyclo‐(CF₃)₂B‐NMe₂‐S(=O)‐N=C(OR)‐O) and four‐membered rings (cyclo‐(CF₃)₂B‐NMe₂‐S(=O)‐N(C=O)OR) for R = Me ( 6 and 9 ), Et ( 7 and 10 ), and C₆H₅ ( 8 and 11 ). The structure of 5 has been determined by X‐ray diffraction.     

Crystal and Molecular Structures of the Pentafluorosulfanyl Compounds,SF5X (X = ‐NC, ‐CN, ‐NCO, ‐NCS and ‐NCCl2) by X‐ray Diffraction at Low Temperature

A new method for the synthesis of the unstable pentafluorosulfanyl isocyanide from N‐(pentafluorosulfanyl)(dichloromethanimine) was developed, thereby allowing for the study of its spectroscopic data. The structure of pentafluorosulfanyl isocyanide was determined by X‐ray crystallography at 113 K. The molecule possesses an almost linear S‐N‐C arrangement and an unexpectedly long S‐N bond. In addition, the structures of pentafluorosulfanyl cyanide, pentafluorosulfanyl isocyanate, pentafluorosulfanyl isothiocyanate, and N‐(pentafluorosulfanyl)(dichloro)methanimine were determined by single crystal X‐ray crystallography at low temperatures.     

[Fc2B2(Br)(μ‐NPEt3)2]+Br– – ein Ferrocenyl‐substituierter Phosphaniminato‐Komplex des Bors

[Fc₂B₂(Br)(μ‐NPEt₃)₂]⁺Br^– – a Ferrocenyl‐substituted Phosphoraneiminato Complex of Boron [Fc₂B₂(Br)(μ‐NPEt₃)₂]⁺Br^– has been prepared from ferrocenylboron dibromide, [Fe(η⁵‐C₅H₅)(η⁵‐C₅H₄BBr₂)], and the silylated phosphoraneimine Me₃SiNPEt₃ in dichloromethane solution to give orange‐red single crystals which were characterized by IR, NMR and ⁵⁷Fe Mössbauer spectra, as well as by a crystal structure determination. [Fc₂B₂(Br)(μ‐NPEt₃)₂]⁺Br^– · 3 CH₂Cl₂ ( 1 · 3 CH₂Cl₂): Space group P2₁/n, Z = 4, lattice dimensions at –50 °C: a = 1370.6(3), b = 2320.9(5), c = 1454.4(2), β = 95.38(1)°, R₁ = 0.061. In the cation of 1 the ferrocenyl‐substituted boron atoms are connected by the nitrogen atoms of the [NPEt₃]^– groups to form a planar B₂N₂ four‐membered ring. One of the boron atoms having planar, the other tetrahedral coordination.     

Coordination of a closo‐Cluster at Rhodium and Iridium

Stanna‐closo‐dodecaborate [Bu₃MeN]₂[SnB₁₁H₁₁] reacts as a nucleophile with the rhodium and iridium electrophiles of type [Cp*M(bipy′)Cl][BF₄] under formation of a transition metal tin bond. The zwitterionic molecules [Cp*M(bipy′)(SnB₁₁H₁₁)] (with M = Rh, Ir) were characterized by NMR spectroscopy, elemental analyses and X‐ray crystal structure analyses. A high dipole moment of 25.67 D was calculated by DFT methods in the case of the rhodium derivative.