共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 0 毫秒
1.
Joanna Cyman Magdalena Lemańska Joanna Raczek 《Central European Journal of Mathematics》2006,4(1):34-45
For a given connected graph G = (V, E), a set
is a doubly connected dominating set if it is dominating and both 〈D〉 and 〈V (G)-D〉 are connected. The cardinality of the minimum doubly connected dominating set in G is the doubly connected domination number. We investigate several properties of doubly connected dominating sets and give some bounds on the doubly connected domination
number. 相似文献
2.
3.
Let G=(V,E) be a connected graph. A dominating set S of G is a weakly connected dominating set of G if the subgraph (V,E∩(S×V)) of G with vertex set V that consists of all edges of G incident with at least one vertex of S is connected. The minimum cardinality of a weakly connected dominating set of G is the weakly connected domination number, denoted . A set S of vertices in G is a total dominating set of G if every vertex of G is adjacent to some vertex in S. The minimum cardinality of a total dominating set of G is the total domination number γt(G) of G. In this paper, we show that . Properties of connected graphs that achieve equality in these bounds are presented. We characterize bipartite graphs as well as the family of graphs of large girth that achieve equality in the lower bound, and we characterize the trees achieving equality in the upper bound. The number of edges in a maximum matching of G is called the matching number of G, denoted α′(G). We also establish that , and show that for every tree T. 相似文献
4.
Yang Yuansheng Zhao Chengye Lin Xiaohui Jiang Yongsong Hao Xin 《Journal of Graph Theory》2005,50(4):316-320
Let γ(G) be the domination number of graph G, thus a graph G is k‐edge‐critical if γ (G) = k, and for every nonadjacent pair of vertices u and υ, γ(G + uυ) = k?1. In Chapter 16 of the book “Domination in Graphs—Advanced Topics,” D. Sumner cites a conjecture of E. Wojcicka under the form “3‐connected 4‐critical graphs are Hamiltonian and perhaps, in general (i.e., for any k ≥ 4), (k?1)‐connected, k‐edge‐critical graphs are Hamiltonian.” In this paper, we prove that the conjecture is not true for k = 4 by constructing a class of 3‐connected 4‐edge‐critical non‐Hamiltonian graphs. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 相似文献
5.
A set S of vertices in a graph G is a total dominating set of G if every vertex of G is adjacent to some vertex in S. The minimum cardinality of a total dominating set of G is the total domination number γt(G) of G. It is known [J Graph Theory 35 (2000), 21–45] that if G is a connected graph of order n > 10 with minimum degree at least 2, then γt(G) ≤ 4n/7 and the (infinite family of) graphs of large order that achieve equality in this bound are characterized. In this article, we improve this upper bound of 4n/7 for 2‐connected graphs, as well as for connected graphs with no induced 6‐cycle. We prove that if G is a 2‐connected graph of order n > 18, then γt(G) ≤ 6n/11. Our proof is an interplay between graph theory and transversals in hypergraphs. We also prove that if G is a connected graph of order n > 18 with minimum degree at least 2 and no induced 6‐cycle, then γt(G) ≤ 6n/11. Both bounds are shown to be sharp. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 60: 55–79, 2009 相似文献
6.
Donald A. Nelson 《Journal of Graph Theory》2003,43(3):223-237
A 2‐connected graph G is a critical block if G ? v is not 2‐connected for every vertex v ∈ V(G). A critical block G is a saturated critical block if G + e is not a critical block for any new edge e. The structure of all saturated critical blocks and a procedure for constructing every saturated critical block are determined. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 43: 223–237, 2003 相似文献
7.
A set S of vertices of a connected graph G is a doubly connected dominating set if every vertex not in S is adjacent to some vertex in S and the subgraphs induced by S and V−S are connected. The doubly connected domination numberγcc(G) is the minimum size of such a set. We prove that when G and are both connected of order n, and we describe the two infinite families of extremal graphs achieving the bound. 相似文献
8.
Teresa W. Haynes Michael A. Henning Lucas C. van der Merwe Anders Yeo 《Discrete Mathematics》2011,311(17):315
A graph G is diameter 2-critical if its diameter is two, and the deletion of any edge increases the diameter. Murty and Simon conjectured that the number of edges in a diameter 2-critical graph of order n is at most n2/4 and that the extremal graphs are complete bipartite graphs with equal size partite sets. We use an association with total domination to prove the conjecture for the graphs whose complements have diameter three. 相似文献
9.
10.
Total domination critical and stable graphs upon edge removal 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
A set S of vertices in a graph G is a total dominating set of G if every vertex of G is adjacent to some vertex in S. The minimum cardinality of a total dominating set of G is the total domination number of G. A graph is total domination edge critical if the removal of any arbitrary edge increases the total domination number. On the other hand, a graph is total domination edge stable if the removal of any arbitrary edge has no effect on the total domination number. In this paper, we characterize total domination edge critical graphs. We also investigate various properties of total domination edge stable graphs. 相似文献
11.
It is well‐known that every planar graph has a vertex of degree at most five. Kotzig proved that every 3‐connected planar graph has an edge xy such that deg(x) + deg (y) ≤ 13. In this article, considering a similar problem for the case of three or more vertices that induce a connected subgraph, we show that, for a given positive integer t, every 3‐connected planar graph G with |V(G)| ≥ t has a connected subgraph H of order t such that Σx∈V(H) degG(x) ≤ 8t − 1. As a tool for proving this result, we consider decompositions of 3‐connected planar graphs into connected subgraphs of order at least t and at most 2t − 1. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Graph Theory 30: 191–203, 1999 相似文献
12.
An m‐covering of a graph G is a spanning subgraph of G with maximum degree at most m. In this paper, we shall show that every 3‐connected graph on a surface with Euler genus k ≥ 2 with sufficiently large representativity has a 2‐connected 7‐covering with at most 6k ? 12 vertices of degree 7. We also construct, for every surface F2 with Euler genus k ≥ 2, a 3‐connected graph G on F2 with arbitrarily large representativity each of whose 2‐connected 7‐coverings contains at least 6k ? 12 vertices of degree 7. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 43: 26–36, 2003 相似文献
13.
A dominating set D ⊆ V(G) is a weakly connected dominating set in G if the subgraph G[D]
w
= (N
G
[D], E
w
) weakly induced by D is connected, where E
w
is the set of all edges having at least one vertex in D. Weakly connected domination number
γw
(G) of a graph G is the minimum cardinality among all weakly connected dominating sets in G. A graph G is said to be weakly connected domination stable or just
γw
-stable if
γw
(G) =
γ w
(G + e) for every edge e belonging to the complement Ḡ of G. We provide a constructive characterization of weakly connected domination stable trees.
相似文献
14.
WANG Tao&YU QingLin Institute of Applied Mathematics College of Mathematics Information Science Henan University Kaifeng China 《中国科学 数学(英文版)》2010,(5)
For a graph G =(V,E),a subset VS is a dominating set if every vertex in V is either in S or is adjacent to a vertex in S.The domination number γ(G) of G is the minimum order of a dominating set in G.A graph G is said to be domination vertex critical,if γ(G-v) γ(G) for any vertex v in G.A graph G is domination edge critical,if γ(G ∪ e) γ(G) for any edge e ∈/E(G).We call a graph G k-γ-vertex-critical(resp.k-γ-edge-critical) if it is domination vertex critical(resp.domination edge critical) and γ(G) = k.Ananchuen and Plummer posed the conjecture:Let G be a k-connected graph with the minimum degree at least k+1,where k 2 and k≡|V|(mod 2).If G is 3-γ-edge-critical and claw-free,then G is k-factor-critical.In this paper we present a proof to this conjecture,and we also discuss the properties such as connectivity and bicriticality in 3-γ-vertex-critical claw-free graph. 相似文献
15.
O. Favaron H. Karami R. Khoeilar S. M. Sheikholeslami L. Volkmann 《Journal of Graph Theory》2010,64(4):323-329
Let G(V, E) be a simple, undirected graph where V is the set of vertices and E is the set of edges. A b‐dimensional cube is a Cartesian product I1×I2×···×Ib, where each Ii is a closed interval of unit length on the real line. The cubicity of G, denoted by cub(G), is the minimum positive integer b such that the vertices in G can be mapped to axis parallel b‐dimensional cubes in such a way that two vertices are adjacent in G if and only if their assigned cubes intersect. An interval graph is a graph that can be represented as the intersection of intervals on the real line—i.e. the vertices of an interval graph can be mapped to intervals on the real line such that two vertices are adjacent if and only if their corresponding intervals overlap. Suppose S(m) denotes a star graph on m+1 nodes. We define claw number ψ(G) of the graph to be the largest positive integer m such that S(m) is an induced subgraph of G. It can be easily shown that the cubicity of any graph is at least ?log2ψ(G)?. In this article, we show that for an interval graph G ?log2ψ(G)??cub(G)??log2ψ(G)?+2. It is not clear whether the upper bound of ?log2ψ(G)?+2 is tight: till now we are unable to find any interval graph with cub(G)>?log2ψ(G)?. We also show that for an interval graph G, cub(G)??log2α?, where α is the independence number of G. Therefore, in the special case of ψ(G)=α, cub(G) is exactly ?log2α2?. The concept of cubicity can be generalized by considering boxes instead of cubes. A b‐dimensional box is a Cartesian product I1×I2×···×Ib, where each Ii is a closed interval on the real line. The boxicity of a graph, denoted box(G), is the minimum k such that G is the intersection graph of k‐dimensional boxes. It is clear that box(G)?cub(G). From the above result, it follows that for any graph G, cub(G)?box(G)?log2α?. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 65: 323–333, 2010 相似文献
16.
17.
A dominating set in a graph G is a connected dominating set of G if it induces a connected subgraph of G. The minimum number of vertices in a connected dominating set of G is called the connected domination number of G, and is denoted by γ c (G). Let G be a spanning subgraph of K s,s and let H be the complement of G relative to K s,s ; that is, K s,s = G ⊕ H is a factorization of K s,s . The graph G is k-γ c -critical relative to K s,s if γ c (G) = k and γ c (G + e) < k for each edge e ∈ E(H). First, we discuss some classes of graphs whether they are γ c -critical relative to K s,s . Then we study k-γ c -critical graphs relative to K s,s for small values of k. In particular, we characterize the 3-γ c -critical and 4-γ c -critical graphs. 相似文献
18.
In this article, we apply a cutting theorem of Thomassen to show that there is a function f: N → N such that if G is a 3‐connected graph on n vertices which can be embedded in the orientable surface of genus g with face‐width at least f(g), then G contains a cycle of length at least cn, where c is a constant not dependent on g. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 41: 69–84, 2002 相似文献
19.
Joseph G. Conlon 《Journal of Graph Theory》2004,45(3):163-223
Let G be a 3‐connected simple graph of minimum degree 4 on at least six vertices. The author proves the existence of an even cycle C in G such that G‐V(C) is connected and G‐E(C) is 2‐connected. The result is related to previous results of Jackson, and Thomassen and Toft. Thomassen and Toft proved that G contains an induced cycle C such that both G‐V(C) and G‐E(C) is 2‐connected. G does not in general contain an even cycle such that G‐V(C) is 2‐connected. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 45: 163–223, 2004 相似文献
20.
Etienne Birmelé 《Journal of Graph Theory》2008,58(4):293-298
Carsten Thomassen conjectured that every longest circuit in a 3‐connected graph has a chord. We prove the conjecture for graphs having no K3,3 minor, and consequently for planar graphs. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 58: 293–298, 2008 相似文献