Hedge fund performance appraisal using data envelopment analysis

In this paper we apply data envelopment analysis (DEA) to evaluate the performance of hedge fund classifications. The purpose of alternative investment strategies such as hedge funds is to offer absolute returns, so using passive benchmarks to measure their performance could be ineffective. With the increasing number of hedge funds available, institutional investors, pension funds, and high net worth individuals urgently need a trustworthy efficiency appraisal method. DEA can achieve this. An important benefit of the DEA measure is that benchmarks are not required, thereby alleviating the problem of using traditional benchmarks to examine non-normal distribution of hedge fund returns. We suggest that DEA be used as a complimentary technique (or method) for the selection of efficient hedge funds and funds of hedge funds for investors. Using DEA can shed light and further validate hedge fund manager selection with other methodologies.     

A data envelopment approach to decision analysis

A decision aid to assist the development of a linear valuation function for multiple attribute problems is proposed, based on a linear programming formulation using a constraint set structured in a similar manner to data envelopment analysis (DEA). Value functions which favour each decision option are calculated, and efficient, potentially optimal, options identified. These are used to help a decision maker progressively to articulate preferences, indicators of his/her values, in an interactive, structurally flexible manner. As preference indications are provided, candidate value functions and hitherto efficient options inconsistent with his/her declarations are eliminated, thus proceeding towards an explicit value function and, if needed a corresponding complete option order.     

Incorporating the learning effect into data envelopment analysis to measure MSW recycling performance

The effect of organizational learning, which results in continuous improvement of organizational performance over time, has been widely discussed. The cumulative learning effect may form as a source of intellectual capital. Thus far, the static data envelopment analysis (DEA) model has not been used to examine the longitudinal learning effect. Therefore, a two-stage approach is developed together with the estimation of a latent learning effect using time-series data; the estimated learning effect is then used as an input in the DEA Slacks-Based Measure (SBM) model. The proposed DEA SBM model can be used to investigate the efficiency of the organizational learning effect of Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) recycling systems.     

A multiple criteria approach to data envelopment analysis

In this paper, we present a Multiple Criteria Data Envelopment Analysis (MCDEA) model which can be used to improve discriminating power of DEA methods and also effectively yield more reasonable input and output weights without a priori information about the weights. In the proposed model, several different efficiency measures, including classical DEA efficiency, are defined under the same constraints. Each measure serves as a criterion to be optimized. Efficiencies are then evaluated under the framework of multiple objective linear programming (MOLP). The method is illustrated through three examples in which data sets are taken from previous research on DEA's discriminating power and weight restriction.     

A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis

In most models of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), the best performers have the full efficient status denoted by unity (or 100%), and, from experience, we know that usually plural Decision Making Units (DMUs) have this “efficient status”. To discriminate between these efficient DMUs is an interesting subject. This paper addresses this “super-efficiency” issue by using the slacks-based measure (SBM) of efficiency, which the author proposed in his previous paper [European Journal of Operational Research 130 (2001) 498]. The method differs from the traditional one based on the radial measure, e.g. Andersen and Petersen model, in that the former deals directly with slacks in inputs/outputs, while the latter does not take account of the existence of slacks. We will demonstrate the rationality of our approach by comparing it with the radial measure of super-efficiency. The proposed method will be particularly useful when the number of DMUs are small compared with the number of criteria employed for evaluation.     

Manufacturing performance measurement and target setting: A data envelopment analysis approach

Manufacturing decision makers have to deal with a large number of reports and metrics for evaluating the performance of manufacturing systems. Since the metrics provide different and at times conflicting assessments, it is hard for the manufacturing decision makers to track and improve overall manufacturing system performance. This research presents a data envelopment analysis (DEA) based approach for performance measurement and target setting of manufacturing systems. The approach is applied to two different manufacturing environments. The performance peer groups identified using DEA are utilized to set performance targets and to guide performance improvement efforts. The DEA scores are checked against past process modifications that led to identified performance changes. Limitations of the DEA based approach are presented when considering measures that are influenced by factors outside of the control of the manufacturing decision makers. The potential of a DEA based generic performance measurement approach for manufacturing systems is provided.     

A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis

In this paper, we will propose a slacks-based measure (SBM) of efficiency in Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). This scalar measure deals directly with the input excesses and the output shortfalls of the decision making unit (DMU) concerned. It is units invariant and monotone decreasing with respect to input excess and output shortfall. Furthermore, this measure is determined only by consulting the reference-set of the DMU and is not affected by statistics over the whole data set. The new measure has a close connection with other measures proposed so far, e.g., Charnes–Cooper–Rhodes (CCR), Banker–Charnes–Cooper (BCC) and the Russell measure of efficiency. The dual side of this model can be interpreted as profit maximization, in contrast to the ratio maximization of the CCR model. Numerical experiments show its validity as an efficiency measurement tool and its compatibility with other measures of efficiency.     

A distribution-free approach to estimating best response values with application to mutual fund performance modeling

Frontier regression models seek to model and estimate best rather than average values of a response variable. Our proposed frontier model has similar intent, but also allows for an additional error term. The composed error approach uses the sum of two error terms, one an inefficiency error and the other as white noise. Previous research proposed assumptions on the distributions of the error components so that the distribution of this total error can be specified. Here we propose a distribution free approach to specifying these errors. In addition, our approach is completely data driven, rendering model specification an unnecessary step. We also outline, step-by-step, an approach to implementing this procedure. Our entire approach is illustrated with a mutual fund data set from the Morning Star database.     

Financial statement analysis: A data envelopment analysis approach

Ratio analysis is a commonly used analytical tool for verifying the performance of a firm. While ratios are easy to compute, which in part explains their wide appeal, their interpretation is problematic, especially when two or more ratios provide conflicting signals. Indeed, ratio analysis is often criticized on the grounds of subjectivity, that is the analyst must pick and choose ratios in order to assess the overall performance of a firm.In this paper we demonstrate that Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) can augment the traditional ratio analysis. DEA can provide a consistent and reliable measure of managerial or operational efficiency of a firm. We test the null hypothesis that there is no relationship between DEA and traditional accounting ratios as measures of performance of a firm. Our results reject the null hypothesis indicating that DEA can provide information to analysts that is additional to that provided by traditional ratio analysis. We also apply DEA to the oil and gas industry to demonstrate how financial analysts can employ DEA as a complement to ratio analysis.     

A new clustering approach using data envelopment analysis

In this paper, we present a new clustering method that involves data envelopment analysis (DEA). The proposed DEA-based clustering approach employs the piecewise production functions derived from the DEA method to cluster the data with input and output items. Thus, each evaluated decision-making unit (DMU) not only knows the cluster that it belongs to, but also checks the production function type that it confronts. It is important for managerial decision-making where decision-makers are interested in knowing the changes required in combining input resources so it can be classified into a desired cluster/class. In particular, we examine the fundamental CCR model to set up the DEA clustering approach. While this approach has been carried for the CCR model, the proposed approach can be easily extended to other DEA models without loss of generality. Two examples are given to explain the use and effectiveness of the proposed DEA-based clustering method.     

A Euclidean distance-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) has been proven as an excellent data-oriented performance evaluation method when multiple inputs and outputs are present in a set of peer decision-making units (DMUs). Several efficiency measures have been proposed in the DEA literature, see, for instances, radial efficiency measure of Charnes et al. (CCR)(A. Charnes. W.W. Cooper, and E. Rhodes, 1978. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2, 429–444), Russell graph measure (J.T. Russell, and R. Sirvant. 1999. An enhanced DEA Russell graph efficiency measure. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 115, pp. 596–607) and slack-based measure of Tone (K. Tone, 2001. A slack-based measure of efficiency in DEA. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 130, p. 498–509). In this article, we will propose an Euclidean distance-based measure of efficiency. Then, in order to discriminate the performance of efficient DMUs, an alternative super-efficiency DEA model is proposed. The applicability of the models developed is illustrated in the context of the analysis of gas companies performance.     

A multi-objective approach to determine alternative targets in data envelopment analysis

The choice for radial projections of classic data envelopment analysis (DEA) models, resulting in a number of projections onto the Pareto-inefficient portion of the frontier, has been seen lately as a disadvantage in DEA. The search for a non-radial projection method resulted in developments such as preference structure models. These models consider a priori preference incorporation, using weights in the search for the most preferred efficient target, although presenting some implementation difficulties. In this paper, we propose a multi-objective approach that determines the bases for a posteriori preference incorporation, through individual projections of each variable (input or output) as an objective function, thus allowing one to obtain a target at every extreme-efficient point on the frontier. This multi-objective approach is shown to be equivalent to the preference structure models, yet presenting some advantages, such as the mapping of the possible weights, assigned to partial efficiencies of an observed unit, in order to reach a specific target.     

Supply chain performance evaluation with data envelopment analysis and balanced scorecard approach

One of the most complicated decision making problems for managers is the evaluation of supply chain (SC) performance which involves various criteria. Though vast studies have been recorded on supply chain efficiency evaluation via balanced scorecard (BSC) approach, these studies do not focus on the relationships between the four perspectives of BSC approach. The present paper is an attempt focusing on these relationships, especially the returnable ones. To do so, at first, all relationships between the four perspectives of BSC were determined and then the DEMATEL approach was employed to obtain a network structure. This network structure was then used to create a network DEA model. Since it was not possible to calculate the efficiency evaluation score by BSC, the data envelopment analysis (DEA) model was used for such an evaluation. Moreover, after reviewing different tools to evaluate the performance of supply chain, a new approach, relying on network DEA with BSC approach, was generated. Finally, this model was applied in the Iranian food industry to evaluate its supply chains efficiency and the results proved the high efficiency of the model designed. The findings could be used in various evaluation processes in different industries.     

A network-based approach for increasing discrimination in data envelopment analysis

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is known to produce more than one efficient decision-making unit (DMU). This paper proposes a network-based approach for further increasing discrimination among these efficient DMUs. The approach treats the system under study as a directed and weighted network in which nodes represent DMUs and the direction and strength of the links represent the relative relationship among DMUs. In constructing the network, the observed node is set to point to its referent DMUs as suggested by DEA. The corresponding lambda values for these referent DMUs are taken as the strength of the network link. The network is weaved by not only the full input/output model, but also by models of all possible input/output combinations. Incorporating these models into the system basically introduces the merits of each DMU under various situations into the system and thus provides the key information for further discrimination. Once the network is constructed, the centrality concept commonly used in social network analysis—specifically, eigenvector centrality—is employed to rank the efficient DMUs. The network-based approach tends to rank high the DMUs that are not specialized and have balanced strengths.     

Prior-Ratio-Analysis procedure to improve data envelopment analysis for performance measurement

This paper proposes the use of a Prior-Ratio-Analysis procedure, analysing output/input ratio indicators, allowing the improvement in efficiency measurement by means of data envelopment analysis (DEA) methodology. This prior analysis is based on the existence of a relationship of individual ratio in the firms to DEA efficiency scores. Use of the proposed procedure allows (i) detection of efficient units whose efficiency could be overestimated and (ii) identification of certain inputs/outputs enhancing particular behaviours. Accordingly, the DEA efficiency analysis could be improved with a major understanding about the factors determining the unit efficiency, and with a measure as a true indicator for discriminating between units, and for ranking them.     

An extended slacks-based measure model for data envelopment analysis with negative data

Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a non-parametric approach based on linear programming that has been widely applied for evaluating the relative efficiency of a set of homogeneous decision-making units (DMUs) with multiple inputs and outputs. The original DEA models use positive input and output variables that are measured on a ratio scale, but these models do not apply to the variables in which negative data can appear. However, with the widespread use of interval scale data and undesirable data, the emphasis has been directed towards the simultaneous consideration of the positive and negative data in DEA models. In this paper, using the slacks-based measure, we propose an extended model to evaluate the efficiency of DMUs, even if some variables are measured on an interval scale and some on a ratio scale. Moreover, the extended model allows for the presence of all interval-scale variables, which are capable of taking both negative and positive values.     

Using data envelopment analysis to model the performance of UK coastguard centres

This paper uses data envelopment analysis (DEA) to assess the operational effectiveness of the UK Coastguard (Maritime Rescue) coordination centres over the period 1995–1998. Based on the development of a performance measurement framework that is considerably more realistic and complex than the one apparently used by the Government, the main grounds for the latter's decision—confirmed in 1999—to close the Oban, Pentland and Tyne Tees coordination centres are called into question. The paper aims to contribute to the relevant academic literature in two ways: (1) by using formal analysis methods to measure the operational performance of a vital government-supplied service where such methods have not been applied before; and (2) by demonstrating how the results of suitable regression models can be used to inform the specification of appropriate DEA models, particularly with respect to the incorporation of relevant environmental factors.     

The influence curve approach in data envelopment analysis

The behavior of efficiency in the stochastic DEA model is examined here in terms of the influence curve approach which quantifies the influence of observed data on the empirical fit of the production frontier. Data influence is analyzed here through robustness. Two types of robustness and sensitivity issues are analyzed here in terms of (a) a new class of minimax measures, and (b) a set nonlinear efficiency measures and it is shown through empirical applications that in suitable cases these measures outperform the conventional ones.This is a revised version of an invited paper presented at the 13th International Symposium on Mathematical Programming held in tokyo, Japan, 29 August 2 September 1988. Sincere thanks are due to Professors A. Charnes and J. Sojka for their valuable comments and suggestions. Thanks are also due to the Guest Editor S. Shinoda and the two anonymous referees for their comments.     

Qualitative factors in data envelopment analysis: A fuzzy number approach

Qualitative factors are difficult to mathematically manipulate when calculating the efficiency in data envelopment analysis (DEA). The existing methods of representing the qualitative data by ordinal variables and assigning values to obtain efficiency measures only superficially reflect the precedence relationship of the ordinal data. This paper treats the qualitative data as fuzzy numbers, and uses the DEA multipliers associated with the decision making units (DMUs) being evaluated to construct the membership functions. Based on Zadeh’s extension principle, a pair of two-level mathematical programs is formulated to calculate the α-cuts of the fuzzy efficiencies. Fuzzy efficiencies contain more information for making better decisions. A performance evaluation of the chemistry departments of 52 UK universities is used for illustration. Since the membership functions are constructed from the opinion of the DMUs being evaluated, the results are more representative and persuasive.     

An extended shortest path problem: A data envelopment analysis approach

A special and important network structured linear programming problem is the shortest path problem. Classical shortest path problems assume that there are unit of shipping cost or profit along an arc. In many real occasions, various attributes (various costs and profits) are usually considered in a shortest path problem. Because of the frequent occurrence of such network structured problems, there is a need to develop an efficient procedure for handling these problems. This paper studies the shortest path problem in the case that multiple attributes are considered along the arcs. The concept of relative efficiency is defined for each path from initial node to final node. Then, an efficient path with the maximum efficiency is determined.